Sex Work
Letters to the Editor
Blaming Clinton for three decades of Chinese spying; Cintra doesn't really understand why blacks are angry.
The Manchurian presidency
BY DAVID HOROWITZ
(06/21/99)
The current scandal dates back to theft of information that began in 1970.
The Bush administration was made aware of Chinese spying and came to the
conclusion that nuclear security was not an issue. The story was largely
ignored by the media in 1990, and only now is it coming to further light.
I would go so far as to say that the only reason the scandal is generating
so much interest on Capitol Hill now is that conservatives, still stung by
the fact that they could not remove Clinton from office, are attempting to
lay the current scandal at Clinton’s feet with an eye on campaign 2000.
Wouldn’t it be nice if Horowitz and conservatives could actually view current and future crises of U.S. policy objectively? Of course it would be much harder to find solutions to
security leaks over the last 30 years than to point fingers and lay all
blame where only a small fraction of it belongs.
– Kevin Barry
I remember commiserating with a brother over the first term of the Clinton
presidency as the ’96 elections drew near. We both thought the last four
years had been pretty disastrous; I told him that the next election was crucial to our future, saying, “The reelection of President Clinton will indicate that God is through with us as a nation.”
I did not know how prescient my comment was. What has been
revealed as the work of this president is nothing less than the dismantling
of this country. It is obvious that the president and the Democratic
Party broke the law to win reelection (the Democrat vote of illegal
immigrants allowed in days before and during the election, etc.).
But also, America repeatedly has shown the power to renew herself. Freedom
does that to a people. With such exposis as Horowitz has written, I still have hope.
– J. T. Wheeler
I’m horrified to see that there are still people like David Horowitz,
who seem to believe it is possible to prevail in a nuclear war. True,
at some point it may be possible to build an effective defense against
ballistic missiles. But developing an “edge” in the form of “more
sophisticated warheads and more accurate missiles” merely ensures that
everyone loses, not that one side can win.
It is immoral to view the deaths of hundreds of millions of people,
on either side, as an acceptable outcome. It is irresponsible to suggest
that one side of such a conflict might survive, since it makes the use
of nuclear weapons more likely.
Now, China’s distribution of this technology to other nations is
troubling. But, like cryptography or computers, what has been discovered
once can be reinvented elsewhere — keeping technology secret is not
a long-term solution to preventing its use. We must find ways of
ensuring stability that do not depend on a nuclear oligopoly; we shall
be forced to do so in the long term anyway.
– Mark Gritter
DAVID HOROWITZ RESPONDS …
It’s true, as Kevin Barry points out, that there were security leaks before the Clinton administration. But there was not a wholesale dismantling of security controls by previous administrations, nor a systematic coverup of the leaks, nor a
massive cash flow into the coffers of the administration party by people associated with the intelligence and military of the spying power. Timelines printed on Rep. Curt Weldon’s Web site show the damage that took place specifically in the Clinton years, as a result of the Clinton policy.
As for Mark Gritter’s outrage, it is simply misplaced. Nowhere did I say or imply that the United States or any other nation could prevail in a nuclear war.
Adventures in the skin trade
BY ROLF POTTS
(06/22/99)
Rolf Potts’ pious refusal to have sex with a Phnom Penh hooker is pretty
funny considering that by publishing his piece in a widely read magazine
in a rich country he will probably be responsible for drawing hundreds,
perhaps thousands of wealthy, voracious sex tourists to Cambodia. He’s
not willing to patronize the industry but he’ll gladly do PR for it. Your
travel section has recently devoted a lot of space to publicizing
discount third-world sex opportunities. Recent pieces by male writers who carefully deny that they would ever patronize a prostitute — and in fact devote much of their articles to
smarmy agonizing about it — strike me as the very familiar American
blend of piety and leering voyeurism.
– Marcus Stanley
Bitter and blacker
BY CINTRA WILSON
(06/22/99)
My instinct tells me that Cintra Wilson doesn’t really believe the
deep-seated frustration and bitterness, so often voiced by black
comedians, is reasonable. That lack of knowledge seems especially difficult for “hip” white people
to accept about themselves.
If Wilson desires to gain a better grasp of this “simple, profound,
multi-generational resentment, which … is usually
kept hidden under the mild social politeness that has always kept
integrated society from dissolving into total mayhem,” she should pull
out the article she wrote about the Ricky Martin phenomenon.
In that article, she wrote: “The pop sensation machine
has finally found the answer, however, to the age-old marketing
conundrum of What Makes Girls Randy, and now all media outlets are
saturated with bedroom-haired, cologne-marinated, undergraduate-age
dancing boys.” News flash: Black girls have known that for years
because black guys were “sellin’ it” that way long
before Ricky Martin perfected his winning Colgate smile. But now that
young white guys are finally learning how to dance, a white guy who
can keep a beat instead of chug-a-lugging beer is considered hip and
sexy. I’m amazed at how white folks continually push this
notion that it ain’t happening unless white folks steer the bandwagon.
It sure would be nice if people like Wilson could tell a more complete story
when they write about our American culture. But because they don’t — either out of ignorance or deliberate omission — it becomes a source of resentment.
And one other thing: Regarding Wilson’s detection of a “one of these
things just doesn’t belong here” vibe while she attended Rock’s show at
Harlem’s Apollo Theatre, I say, “Welcome to the club.”
– Bob Campbell
Rochester Hills, Mich.
Brilliant Careers: Germaine Greer
BY LAURA MILLER
(06/22/99)
and
In search of granny porn
BY CAROL LLOYD
(06/22/99)
Surely some of society’s beliefs concerning our so-called limitations are the result of cultural programming, and bio-determinism has been used as an excuse to tell us we are naturally timid and
submissive, and other such rubbish proffered by men. We must not feed
their ignorant bias and strengthen their foolish arguments, however, by rejecting
observational science in an extreme “reaction” to their stupidity.
It is obvious that there are innate differences between the genders. Germaine Greer does us all a disservice, however, when she advocates the rejection of intersex females, basing her arguments on misapprehended and ill-applied facts of biology and genetics, and other
facets of the very bio-determinism she repudiates.
Greer, and those like her, should be repudiated for their appalling
diatribes and mean-spirited attacks on women who have been biologically
challenged at worst, and who are likely to prove to be very helpful in our
understanding of ourselves and of human sexuality in general.
– Natasha Lumna
Walnut Creek, Calif.
What a shame that Germaine Greer, in all her world-wide wisdom, is so much more interested in becoming famous for debunking other peoples’ truths than she is in finding out the common medical fact that estrogen decreases the risk of dementia in women.
– Judith Beck
Has feminism changed science?
BY MARGARET WERTHEIM
(06/22/99)
Wertheim’s reviews are less about the influence of
feminism on the practice of scientific investigation, and more about the prevalence of the
influence of “relativist” thinking in the history of science.
Given that she and others are able to reflect
on the role of cultural biases and conditioning in the
process of scientific analysis and discovery, is it not
obvious that, progressively, such biases will over time be
exposed, and the results which they shaded or caused to be
misrepresented will be shown to be false?
Her example is a near-perfect case of scientific
accuracy progressively increasing. And let us add that we
are looking at a relatively short span of scientific
history: It would be even more instructive to make a
catalogue of all the many hundreds of cultural biases on
record which have been similarly clarified in the slowly
accumulating body of observed objective reality over,
say, the last 3,000 years, and which no longer
cloud our collective understanding of reality.
To say that there is no cultural bias in scientific
investigation, or, indeed, in any other branch of human
discovery, would be absurd. But it is equally absurd to
argue that we are doomed to be hoodwinked by our cultural
biases permanently. It may very well be that we’ll never be
entirely free from culturally induced hypothetical and
analytical errors, but it surely is the case that more and
more of them shall be exposed, and that the body of
objective understanding will be, progressively, more and
more accurate.
– David Yancey
Games don’t kill people — do they?
BY GREG COSTIKYAN
(06/21/99)
Greg Costikyan’s extremely well-thought-out article
hit the nail right on the head. As a 19-year-old who has been an avid computer
gamer for nearly 10 years, my thoughts have been those of Costikyan’s:
Parents, politicians and gaming naysayers all chastise the games we play
and the people who play them simply because they did not grow up with the
technology. They do not understand the media, and more importantly, they do not realize that individuals who are playing these games are actually less harmful to society, as they are relieving their tensions and gaming proclivities through a mouse and keyboard rather
than a real arsenal. The gaming industry ought to seriously consider Costikyan’s piece its mantra on the issue in the long and tedious government probes surely to ensue in the coming months.
– Doug Leney
A sexual education in Cuba
The dance of need and desire differs from one country to another.
It’s hard to see anything. It’s dark, and the strobe lights intermittently illuminating the inside of the Copacabana aren’t much help. The arms flailing with shoulders and torsos following them in the air above the dance floor make it hard to focus on anything at all. In the intermittent swatches of light, I can see the face of the girl I am dancing with. Her lips look inflated, swollen like frozen red waves, as if I could take a pin and pop them. Her dark hair is sashaying behind her back in bouquets of ringlets. She puts her arms around my neck now and I can smell her. And then she moves in closer.
Continue Reading CloseDaniel Weinshenker is finishing up an M.A. in creative writing at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Between vacations, he works at an agency creating slogans for car rental companies. His fiction has appeared in the Pittsburgh Quarterly and Pif. More Daniel Weinshenker.
Gypsy Rose Coed
Mount Holyoke girls learn how to bump and grind from a tenured professor.
In western Massachusetts, where I went to college, there used to be a saying about how local guys regarded students at the area’s two women’s colleges: “Smith to bed, Mount Holyoke to wed.” Smithies were considered the good-time girls, the ones who could match you drink-for-drink when doing tequila shots, or who might be caught skinny-dipping in the Connecticut River at 2 a.m. on a school night. Mount Holyoke girls, on the other hand, were more buttoned up — the kind you could bring home to mom, the kind who played tennis and wore Peter Pan collars.
Continue Reading CloseSarah Gold is a graduate of the nonfiction writing program at the New School for Social Research. More Sarah Gold.
Seven deadly sins: Pimps and Ho's
Pimps and Ho's: One college's theme party is another man's ethical quandary.
Prostitution seems to have a grip on the undergraduate imagination. In the last two weeks two different parties at Haverford, my campus of a thousand
people, took “Pimps and Ho’s” as their costume theme. As far as I am aware,
this was a coincidence — both parties were planned well in advance, and
attendance at the two did not overlap much. I went to one.
I may as well confess from the outset that I am a prude and a geek. I spent several minutes puzzling over an invitation in the mailroom of the campus center, standing in the middle of the hall, bumping into people, and explaining myself confusedly: “I’m sorry … It’s an invitation … I have to be a pimp on Saturday … Excuse me …” Eventually I sat down, still muttering: “I don’t know … What does this mean?“
Continue Reading CloseIsaac Zaur is a senior at Haverford College. More Isaac Zaur.
The kindest cut
The kindest cut. When visiting a salon, some men opt for full-service grooming.
For most women, hair salons are the modern-day version of the confessional. The wet-haired penitent sits in the chair, confronting the reflection of herself and her scissors-wielding confessor, happy to spill all her guilty secrets in return for some snappy advice and a newly clipped do. I’ve heard many a tortured love saga at Marie’s salon, while ostensibly leafing through the latest issue of Marie Claire or Hair Now. If Freud had really been serious about understanding female desire, he need only have spent an afternoon at the local Viennese hair salon.
Continue Reading CloseHome Movies by Charles Taylor: Love hurts
French director Bertrand Blier asks why women find men so baffling -- and vice versa.
Bertrand Blier’s films present us with a world of companionable strangers.
His characters freely unload their romantic burdens to people they run
across in cafes or on the street, and they always find a friendly ear
because everyone is equally befuddled by love. Jean Renoir showed us a
world where people were united by class. In Blier’s world, it’s gender that
binds people together. Men and women are utter mysteries to each other,
mysteries as intoxicating as they are infuriating. And yet neither sex can
keep themselves from plunging into those puzzles of the heart and the
flesh, confident that this time, they’ll solve it. To borrow a phrase from
novelist W.M. Spackman, men and women in Blier’s films regard each
other as “a presence with secrets.”
Charles Taylor is a columnist for the Newark Star-Ledger. More Charles Taylor.
Page 38 of 39 in Sex Work