<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sexting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sexting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Send her your sexts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/send_her_your_sexts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/send_her_your_sexts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karen finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karen Finley's exhibit at the New Museum will feature sketches and oil paintings of patrons' smutty sex pics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you've ever sent a nudie pic to your significant other, and you've wondered what the grainy image would look like in the hands of a master portraitist -- a da Vinci, say, or a Caravaggio -- performance artist Karen Finley is about to make your kinky art history nerd dreams come true. From May 23 to May 26, the artist is asking the public to <a href="http://www.newmuseum.org/calendar/view/sext-me-if-you-can-by-karen-finley-performance-and-installation-2">send her their personal sexts</a>, which she will reproduce as a series of paintings in an installation at the New Museum.</p><p>The process works like this: for a fee ($200 for a work on paper, $500 for an oil on canvas), the exhibitionistically inclined can arrange brief private sittings with Finley. They'll be given the artist's private phone number and can snap away. Once Finley has received the photos, she'll translate them into a series of paintings to be publicly displayed in the New Museum lobby. After the exhibition closes on May 26, the subjects can take home their work to be stored as a memento of free-spirited youth, or hung in the living room to the chagrin of friends and family.</p><p>Finley, a professor at New York University's Tisch School of the Arts, has never shied away from controversy. In 1990, she was <a href="http://www.franklinfurnace.org/research/essays/nea4/ayers.html">one of four artists</a> whose NEA grants were revoked on the grounds that their work was obscene. "Sext Me If You Can" is presented by NE 4 In Residence, which revisits the four grant recipients' work.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/send_her_your_sexts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/send_her_your_sexts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Anthony Weiner gears for a comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/must_see_morning_clip_anthony_weiner_gears_for_a_comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/must_see_morning_clip_anthony_weiner_gears_for_a_comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Congressman is considering a mayoral run, but Stephen Colbert can't forget the past]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Rep. Anthony Weiner is considering a mayoral run for New York. Cue the obligatory sex jokes, à la "The Colbert Report":</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:colbertnation.com:425351" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b>The Colbert Report</b> <br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/'>Colbert Report Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.colbertnation.com/video'>Video Archive</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/must_see_morning_clip_anthony_weiner_gears_for_a_comeback/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/must_see_morning_clip_anthony_weiner_gears_for_a_comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who cares about seeing Ashley Judd naked?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Daily Caller's latest attack rings hollow in the age of sexting, boob songs and Bush's leaked self-portraits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have probably seen Ashley Judd naked. The Daily Caller would like to remind you of this in the context of her probable plans to run for Senate in Kentucky. The question is, does anyone care anymore about whom they've seen naked? And if they do, will they care in a decade or two?</p><p>Yes, the Daily Caller piece, to which I refuse to link, was sexist and gross. It was, as ThinkProgress's Alyssa Rosenberg <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2013/03/04/1665011/theatrical-slut-shaming-daily-caller-attacks-ashley-judd-for-movie-nude-scenes/">put it</a>, "part and parcel of the right’s current strategy to discredit promising female advocates," and "an attempt to make her seem less serious by impugning her sexual chastity." Was Scott Brown's strategically placed <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/03/potential-senate-candidate-ashley-judd-on-screen-nudity-naked-actors-politicians">arm</a> over the flesh he bared in Cosmo the difference between his getting elected to the Senate and not, or was it the double standard?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI agents use government BlackBerrys for sexting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/fbi_agents_use_government_blackberrys_for_sexting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/fbi_agents_use_government_blackberrys_for_sexting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fbi misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaked internal memo shows how agents are disciplined for infractions that include domestic abuse, drunk driving]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's the official line from FBI assistant director Candice Will on the use of agency BlackBerry phones by employees: "When you are given an FBI BlackBerry, it's for official use. It's not to text the woman in another office who you found attractive or to send a picture of yourself in a state of undress. That is not why we provide you an FBI BlackBerry."</p><p>Will offered this sage advice to agents on CNN Thursday, following the <a href="i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/02/21/office.of.professional.review.-.cnn01302013_0000.pdf">leak</a> of an internal FBI memo to the network that detailed a string of indiscretions and abuses perpetrated by unnamed agents -- among them, "used government-issued Blackberry to send sexually explicit messages to another employee."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/fbi_agents_use_government_blackberrys_for_sexting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/fbi_agents_use_government_blackberrys_for_sexting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vine: The future of sex?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13185517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's easy to imagine how the micro-video app could change sexting and amateur porn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Twitter's new video-sharing app battles the inevitable <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/twitters_new_micro_video_app_is_predictably_flooded_with_porn/">proliferation of porn</a>, I can't help wondering what Vine could mean for the future of sexting and amateur smut. (I mean, aside from the prospect of an annoying new portmanteau to describe the act of digitally sharing naked media.) This question is admittedly a bit premature -- Vine, which limits clips to six seconds, doesn't offer a way to privately and directly share videos -- but it's easy to imagine such a development, if not on the part of the app's makers than by some enterprising tech vulture. And while the app has begun blocking searches for terms like "sex" and "NSFW," presumably to avoid violating Apple's puritanical standards, loads of X-rated material is still available; it's just harder to find. (One must know which accounts to follow, or get creative with keyword and username searches.) There's already at least <a href="http://nsfwvine.com">one independent NSFW site</a> compiling naughty vines, and the app's only been around for a few days.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Anthony Weiner back on Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/is_anthony_weiner_back_on_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/is_anthony_weiner_back_on_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weinergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rockaways]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former congressman used Twitter for the first time since his sexting scandal, which started on the site ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a sexually explicit photo on Twitter landed former Rep. Anthony Weiner in a sexting scandal (dubbed "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Weiner_photo_scandal">Weinergate</a>" by the media) the New York representative <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/weinergate_timeline/">resigned</a> from Congress on June 16, 2011. His Twitter account has, unsurprisingly, remained inactive since then.</p><p>That is, until today. Perhaps inspired by the dire need for relief from Hurricane Sandy, Weiner tweeted a link to a video called "Rockaway needs us" to his followers:</p><p>[embed_tweet id="266192356708077568"]</p><p>Although it might signal nothing significant for Weiner, the Observer <a href="http://politicker.com/2012/11/sandy-brings-anthony-weiner-back-to-twitter/">points out</a> that the tweet could be "an attempt to dip his toe into the water for a return to the public eye," as some believe he may eventually seek to reboot his political career.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/is_anthony_weiner_back_on_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/is_anthony_weiner_back_on_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter is for lovers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/twitter_is_for_lovers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/twitter_is_for_lovers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13014018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used my account to talk politics. Until I fell into an affair that was erotic, baffling and heartbreaking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man I never met broke my heart. He followed me on Twitter, on the account I use for occupiers and politics. We flirted about anything: waterfalls, suede boots, doughnuts. He was witty, attentive, charming. His punctuation was exquisite. After dark, we sparked.</p><p>I was on my way to New York for a wedding, and thought he'd said he lived there. When I hinted about meeting, he promised to open the door naked. So I sent a private message to find out if he was in the city. He was home watching a movie and ended up telling me about being betrayed by his ex. I tried cheering him up.</p><p>You’re funny, he said.</p><p>We should write a comedy, I replied, only half-joking.</p><p>He sent me the clip from “King Kong” where Adrian Brody kisses Naomi Watts for the first time. It was the most romantic thing anyone had done in ages.</p><p>Where are you? I asked. I was lying in the hall on my stomach like a schoolgirl, feet in the air.</p><blockquote><p>Hmmm. Okay. I am at my desk, in my bedroom, in my apartment. lol</p> <p>Q: Where are you?</p></blockquote><p>Somehow we ended up playing stripTwitter. Hours later, tangled in bedsheets, battery dying, I was grinning but still didn’t know where he lived.</p><blockquote><p>So you enjoyed? Is it common on Twitter? I should think it is.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/twitter_is_for_lovers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/twitter_is_for_lovers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Weiner gets feminized</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/anthony_weiner_gets_feminized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/anthony_weiner_gets_feminized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12959864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sexting ex-pol and his wife tell People he has been domesticated -- by doing the couple's laundry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Anthony Weiner's <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20612678,00.html">first joint interview</a> with wife Huma Abedin one thing sticks out (aside from the photo of their absurdly adorable 6-month-old): He's doing the laundry. Abedin tells People, "Anthony has spent every day since [the scandal] trying to be the best dad and husband he can be," and the magazine immediately follows up the quote with proof. It turns out Weiner "does <em>all</em> the laundry." What a catch, that guy!</p><p>Sorry to be cynical here -- I mean, I  hope he really does do all the dirty laundry -- but there's a Downy whiff of political calculation here. Is there a more obvious way to show that the sext-crazed ex-congressman has been reformed than to paint him as a laundering hausfrau? Behold, domesticated, feminized Weiner! The Daily Mail <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2175359/Anthony-Weiner-Huma-Abedin-talk-People-magazine-son.html">went so far</a> as to accompany its coverage of the People interview with a photo of him <em>picking up Abedin's dry cleaning. </em>You know a man's in the doghouse when he's doing <em>women's work. </em>Next up I expect a GQ photo shoot of Weiner -- laundry basket on one hip, baby on the other.</p><p>To be clear, I don't care how the couple has privately dealt with his sex scandal. What interests me is how Weiner may be attempting to "make it up" to the general public, especially amid rumors of a run for mayor of New York.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/anthony_weiner_gets_feminized/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/anthony_weiner_gets_feminized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to protect your naked photos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/scar_jo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/scar_jo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/09/15/scar_jo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson is the latest star to have nude pics leaked by hackers, but celebs aren't the only ones at risk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn't just <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/celebritology/post/scarlett-johansson-enlists-fbi-to-investigate-nude-photo-leak/2011/09/14/gIQA9HqUSK_blog.html">Scarlett Johansson</a> and other <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/hackers-hit-jessica-alba-scarlett-johansson-miley-cyrus/story?id=13166046">recently exposed</a> celebrities and politicians who should be concerned about protecting their naughty cellphone snapshots. The FBI may be investigating hacks of roughly 50 celebrities, but many more ordinary folks have had their <a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/news/man-hacked-3200-gmail-accounts-stole-naked-pictures-posted-them-on-facebook-20110117/">naked photos hacked</a> <a href="http://www.isellstpete.com/st-pete-news/largo-fla-news/1021-joseph-campbell-hacked-women-s-emails-then-posted-naked-photos-on-facebook-daily-mail">and stolen</a> within the past year. So, how do you protect yourself?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/scar_jo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/scar_jo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Weiner: What the hell was that?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/weiner_breitbart_press_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/weiner_breitbart_press_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/06/weiner_breitbart_press_conference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An insane press conference caps a bizarre week for the former liberal golden boy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I always say, never trust anything you see on an Andrew Breitbart-published site until it's confirmed by a third party. And ... Anthony Weiner helpfully confirmed that BigGovernment.com has been mostly right about him, in a bizarre press conference late this afternoon. Long story short, despite the fact that it seemed exceedingly unlikely that the congressman was sending dirty pictures of himself to random women he only knew via Twitter, that is, apparently, a thing he enjoys doing. It is a thing he has done with "around six women," none of whom he met in person, both before and during his marriage.</p><p>And who am I to judge? (I am a blogger.) If Anthony Weiner is cybersexing and phone-sexing with women across the nation, that is his god-given right as an American.</p><p>The press conference itself was a perfectly insane cap to a week of increasingly bizarre stories. It began when Breitbart ... crashed it, and yelled about Salon.com and Joan Walsh for a while. Why was he there and who allowed him to speak? Does Weiner even have a staff, anymore? (Andrew: You will get no apology from us -- or from me at least! -- because sometimes even complete frauds get lucky. I don't apologize to Glenn Beck the twice a year he's right about something, either.) It ended with someone from Howard Stern's show asking Weiner if he was "fully erect" as the weepy congressman exited the room. In the middle, Weiner cried, said he was stupid, and admitted he lied. As Choire Sicha noted, his <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2011/06/anthony-weiner-sad-man-likes-to-flirt-on-computer#more">wife was nowhere to be seen.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/weiner_breitbart_press_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/weiner_breitbart_press_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York&#8217;s ironic teen &#8220;sexting&#8221; law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/new_york_sexting_law_weiner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/new_york_sexting_law_weiner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/06/new_york_sexting_law_weiner</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state of Weiner and Lee wants to warn young people against sending out suggestive pictures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York lawmakers are trying to advance a bill that would create an "educational reform" program for teenagers who get in trouble for "sexting," the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304474804576367960734408624.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5">Wall Street Journal</a> reports. Amidst Weinergate, it's hard to ignore the irony that New York's politicians seem in as much need of "sexting" education as its young people.</p><p>The "Cyber Crime Youth Rescue Act" would give prosecutors and judges a more lenient option for dealing with minors accused of using their phones, email or social networking platforms to distribute naked or sexually explicit pictures of themselves or friends (which could constitute child pronography if minors are featured).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/new_york_sexting_law_weiner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/new_york_sexting_law_weiner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do men take crotch shots?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/crotch_shot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/crotch_shot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/06/02/crotch_shot</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether Weiner did or didn't, many men do, and it might be because of biological urges, not just X-rated ones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don't know whether we've all seen Rep. Anthony Weiner's wiener -- and, apparently, <a href="%20http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/06/01/weiner_talk_gets_weird">neither does he.</a> What we do know, though, is that the schlong shot is having its day.</p><p>Before the New York congressman's Twitter scandal, there were of course the <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/11/01/kanye_nude">Brett Favre and Kanye West incidents</a> -- but you need only go as far as Craigslist's casual encounters, Chatroulette or certain 20-something dudes' iPhones for proof that it isn't just male celebrities who are ready for their crotch close-up. It's often intended as a come-on, but the common response from women -- particularly when it is <em>unsolicited</em>&#160; -- is, "Ew, gross."</p><p>So: What's with the penis pics?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/crotch_shot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/crotch_shot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wingers really, really, really hoping Anthony Weiner story holds up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/31/weiner_goldberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/31/weiner_goldberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/31/weiner_goldberg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accusing the New York Democrat of impropriety without compelling evidence seems fair, if you totally hate him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly <em>possible</em> that Representative Anthony Weiner <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/anthony_weiner_dny/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/05/31/weinergate">sexted a young woman</a> who lives in Washington state. My own theory, based primarily on the fact that the only person who seemed to notice the Tweet supposedly sent by Weiner was a creepy right-winger who is obsessed with the New York Democrat, is that one or more of the congressman's social networking profiles were <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phishing">phished</a> or otherwise compromised, as he says. But I could be wrong! (I'm also inclined to believe that if Weiner were sending inappropriate photos to young women, he'd send them directly and not via a public photo-sharing site. But politicians do dumb things!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/31/weiner_goldberg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/31/weiner_goldberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We have no one to blame for celebrity hackers but ourselves</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/celebrity_hackers_tmz_vanessa_hudgens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/celebrity_hackers_tmz_vanessa_hudgens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Bieber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/03/18/celebrity_hackers_tmz_vanessa_hudgens</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Scarlett Johansson and Miley Cyrus fight email leaks, we wonder: What's the difference between this and TMZ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When naked photos of Vanessa Hudgens began surfacing on the Internet in 2009, the "Beastly" star sued the website that posted them, <a href="http://www.moejackson.com">MoeJackson.com</a>, claiming the photos were <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/12/24/vanessa-hudgens-sues-nude-pics-moejackson-butter-media-lawsuit-copyright-cell-phone/">obtained by "unknown methods."</a>&#160; Which at the time, didn't strike anyone as particularly odd: Miley Cyrus, Rihanna, and Demi Lovato have all had friends or acquaintances leak photos of the stars either nude or posing suggestively. But this week even more photos of the young actress were being shopped around the Internet -- strangely, not even TMZ was tempted to buy them -- and <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/03/15/vanessa-hudgens-naked-photos-nude-pictures-more-high-school-musical/">were taken from the same batch as the originals</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/celebrity_hackers_tmz_vanessa_hudgens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/celebrity_hackers_tmz_vanessa_hudgens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to fix &#8220;sexting&#8221; laws</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/sexting_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/sexting_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/03/15/sexting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New Jersey bill is a good start -- but we should do more to defend teens' sexual exploration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently performed an archaeological dig on my childhood closet, which has been perfectly preserved in the state it was in when I flew the nest. Amid all the empty bottles of Smirnoff Ice and aimlessly doodled-on binders, I found a stockpile of what might be referred to in court as "child pornography" -- but it was self-made with my high school boyfriend. The first thought I had when I saw the images -- black-and-white printouts from a webcam -- was how sweet the shots were, despite being mildly explicit. Here were two teenagers safely and lovingly exploring their bodies and sexualities -- and because the images were kept strictly for our eyes only, they maintained that innocence.</p><p>That's why I'm encouraged by news that late yesterday New Jersey approved <a href="http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2010/Bills/A2000/1561_I1.HTM">a bill</a> that would allow teenagers caught "sexting" to avoid being <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2009/02/20/sexting_teens">prosecuted as child pornographers.</a> The bill is based on the wacky notion that teens shouldn't be labeled as sex offenders for the rest of their lives for taking dirty self-portraits, or possessing X-rated photos of their sweetheart who, in many cases, they are legally allowed to have sex with. (Although, that was not the case for me, as the age of consent in California is 18. Whoops.) This measure is a great step toward a saner adult attitude toward teen sexuality, and other states should look to it as a blueprint. But there's also room for improvement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/sexting_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/sexting_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL fines Favre $50,000 for &#8220;failure to cooperate&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commissioner "could not conclude" that star quarterback violated league's personal conduct rules in sexting case]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NFL has fined Brett Favre $50,000 for a "failure to cooperate" with the investigation into allegations he sent inappropriate messages and lewd photos to a former New York Jets game-day hostess.</p><p>The league says Commissioner Roger Goodell "could not conclude" that Favre violated the league's personal conduct policy based on the evidence currently available.</p><p>The league's statement also says Goodell determined Favre was "not candid in several respects during the investigation resulting in a longer review and additional negative public attention for Favre, (Jenn) Sterger and the NFL." The league's investigation began in October and the fine was announced Wednesday.</p><p>Favre allegedly sent messages and photos to Sterger two years ago when they were both with the Jets. The allegations against the 41-year-old Minnesota Vikings quarterback surfaced on the website Deadspin.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>NEW YORK (AP) -- Brett Favre will be fined but not suspended for violating the NFL's personal conduct policy after the league's investigation into allegations he sent inappropriate messages and lewd photos to a former New York Jets game hostess, The Associated Press has learned.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Source: NFL to fine Favre for sexting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After investigation into alleged lurid text messages and photos, sources tell AP he will not be suspended]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett Favre will be fined but not suspended for violating the NFL's personal conduct policy after the league's investigation into allegations he sent inappropriate messages and lewd photos to a former New York Jets game hostess, The Associated Press has learned.</p><p>A person familiar with the decision says the league plans to announce its decision within the next 48 hours. The person spoke on condition of anonymity Wednesday because the NFL had not yet released its decision.</p><p>The person did not specify what the league found in its investigation.</p><p>The punishment was first reported by Fox Sports' Jay Glazer.</p><p>Favre allegedly sent the messages and photos to Jenn Sterger two years ago when they were both with the Jets in 2008. The allegations against the 41-year-old Minnesota Vikings quarterback surfaced in October on the website Deadspin.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/fbn_favre_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alleged Favre target hires legal counsel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/fbn_nfl_favre_sterger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/fbn_nfl_favre_sterger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/feature/2010/10/20/fbn_nfl_favre_sterger</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenn Sterger's lawyers will "pursue any potential remedies that may exist" for sextings supposedly from quarterback]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ex-New York Jets employee involved in the allegation against Brett Favre has hired a lawyer.</p><p>Former Jets game emcee Jenn Sterger has hired the Long Island-based law firm of LaRusso and Conway to advise her throughout the process. Sterger's manager Phil Reese says Wednesday the decision was made "after much deliberation."</p><p>Lawyer Joseph Conway said Wednesday his firm will advise Sterger "and pursue any potential remedies that may exist." Conway declined to comment further.</p><p>Favre spoke with an NFL security official Tuesday about graphic photos and inviting messages he allegedly sent to Sterger two years ago when they were both with the Jets.</p><p>Sterger has not commented on the website Deadspin's report.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/fbn_nfl_favre_sterger/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/fbn_nfl_favre_sterger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget trying to censor teen &#8220;sexting&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/sexting_censors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/sexting_censors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/14/sexting_censors</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple's text-message monitoring program won't solve any parental woes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703673604575550201949192336.html?mod=rss_US_News">numbers-heavy piece</a> today on "the texting revolution" beautifully underscores the absurdity of <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ipad/wpix-apple-patent-sexting,0,2423047.story">Apple's newly-approved patent</a> for what is being widely referred to as "anti-sexting" software. "The average 13- to 17-year-old sends and receives 3,339 texts a month -- more than 100 per day," according to the article. Parents can learn two things from this: 1.) For the love of your checkbook, go for the plan with unlimited texts, and 2.) All attempts at censoring kids' fast-finger-talking are futile.</p><p>The patent is more generally for software that filters "inappropriate" content, and this includes a "parental control application" that "evaluates whether or not the communication contains approved text based on, for example, objective ratings criteria or a user's age or grade level, and, if unauthorized, prevents such text from being included in the text-based communication." The program can then tattle on the teen whenever it comes across "unauthorized" content. It sounds a whole lot like Web monitoring software that supposedly keeps kids from finding porn or talking to pervy strangers online.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/sexting_censors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/14/sexting_censors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sexting&#8221; D.A. to resign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/kratz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/kratz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/09/27/kratz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Kratz announces his plan to step down as Calumet County district attorney]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top Republican prosecutor Ken Kratz is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/27/AR2010092702873.html">stepping down.</a> It seems sending text message come-ons to a domestic abuse victim and a woman seeking his support in a drug charge pardon, and allegedly inviting a woman to an autopsy -- for <em>a date</em> -- has finally caught up to him. The Calumet County district attorney plans to resign by the beginning of October, when a removal hearing is scheduled, his attorney announced Monday. Basically, Kratz, who is already on indefinite paid medical leave, is taking off before Gov. Jim Doyle gets a chance to kick him out. Well played, sir, well played.</p><p>A question remains, however: Why did the Wisconsin Department of Justice, which knew about Kratz's text messages to the domestic abuse victim, clear him <a href="http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/crime_and_courts/article_7a3d083c-c84b-11df-b190-001cc4c03286.html">without even an interview</a>?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/kratz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/kratz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>