<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sexual abuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sexual_abuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who says men can&#8217;t be raped?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/who_says_men_cant_be_raped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/who_says_men_cant_be_raped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tabloid story about a German "nymphomaniac" makes an absurdly sexist error]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what you call someone who demands sex after a partner refuses? Who forces a person to have sex? Whose victim has to escape out a window and call the police? Someone who, according to news accounts, faces charges of "sexual assault and illegal restraint"? You call that person an alleged sex offender. Or, if you're the UK Mirror and the assailant is a female, you just call her a nymphomaniac.</p><p>As first reported in the Canadian site <a href="http://www.theprovince.com/news/German+flees+partner+demanded+much/6447883/story.html">the Province</a> last month – complete with a snuggly picture of a happy couple in bed – a 43-year-old German man told Munich police he had met the 47-year-old woman in a bar, went home with her, and had sex a few times. But when he said he'd had enough, she demanded more and refused to let him leave.  He then fled out a balcony and called the cops. The Mirror then picked up the tale -- this time along with a coy image of a pair of feet in bed – and described the woman as an <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/man-flees-apartment-and-calls-police-795081">"insatiable lover."</a>  She then allegedly struck again early this week, leaving a second man who'd gone home with her after a chance meeting on a bus <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/man-found-sobbing-in-street-after-813563">"sobbing in the street"</a> and pleading to police, "Oh God, it was hell. I can’t walk. Please help me." She has reportedly now been placed under psychiatric evaluation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/who_says_men_cant_be_raped/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/who_says_men_cant_be_raped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s expensive sex offenders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/americas_expensive_sex_offenders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/americas_expensive_sex_offenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Crime Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12879311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ballooning costs are making states rethink laws that would keep these criminals in civil detention for life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In February, a Minnesota judicial panel ordered the release of 64-year-old Clarence Opheim, a convicted child molester who had served nearly 20 years in the Minnesota Security Hospital in St. Peter.</p><p>Before being committed to St. Peter, Opheim had served a five-year prison sentence for molesting an 11-year-old boy. (He also has admitted to molesting nearly 30 other children.) He is currently the only sex offender to ever be successfully released from the state’s Sex Offender Program.</p><p>The historic significance of the moment, however, was lost on many residents of Golden Valley, Minn.</p><p>Before Opheim’s scheduled release in March, according to news reports, <a href="http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/dpp/news/minnesota/clarence-opheim-sex-offender-golden-valley-mar-5-2012">concerned residents of the town packed a community meeting hall</a> to hear the terms of Opheim’s release, meet his social worker, and express their fears of living alongside a convicted sex offender.</p><p>Although Opheim will live in a halfway house, be accompanied by a social worker in public at all times, be forced to consent to regular polygraph testing, and wear a GPS tracking device, residents were still uneasy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/americas_expensive_sex_offenders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/americas_expensive_sex_offenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to friend a sex offender?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12809081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A push is under way to restrict registrants from social networking, virtual gaming and online dating]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a little boy playing Xbox Live with a registered sex offender, a girl striking up a Facebook friendship with a child molester, a Match.com member going on a date with a convicted rapist. These are just a few of the both real world and imagined scenarios that have inspired attempts in recent weeks to restrict registered sex offenders from social networking, virtual gaming and online dating.</p><p>The aim of these approaches is understandable, but their effectiveness is questionable, and some experts see potential for it to backfire. What's more, the breadth of these restrictions, and the inexactness of who is targeted, raise an issue unlikely to garner much sympathy: fairness to sex offenders.</p><p>On Thursday, New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman announced that through an initiative dubbed "Operation: Game Over," several major gaming companies had removed the profiles of more than 3,500 registered sex offenders in the state. The day before, a Louisiana bill forbidding registered sex offenders from using social networking sites <a href="http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/04/house_approves_more_narrowly_t.html">was approved</a> by a state House committee. (A similar bill was signed into law in Illinois in 2009 and put on hold in California in 2011.) Late last month, Match.com, eHarmony and the Spark Networks <a href="http://consumerist.com/2012/03/matchcom-eharmony-others-to-begin-screening-for-sex-offenders.html">signed a "joint statement of business principles"</a> to attempt to screen out registered sex offenders.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Married to a pedophile</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/married_to_a_pedophile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/married_to_a_pedophile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10274142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As two scandals spotlight the spouses of alleged sex offenders, the wife of an abuser shares her story with Salon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a detective showed Jasmine a video of her husband confessing to sexually abusing a 10-year-old girl, she says, "It was like a knife through my heart." The 43-year-old creator of <a href="http://Healingwives.com/">HealingWives.com</a>, an online support group for women with similar experiences, explains, "I felt like a victim myself -- I mean, in an instant, my world changed."</p><p>The experiences of the wives of child abusers are rarely focused on, but the headline-driving allegations against former college coaches Jerry Sandusky and Bernie Fine are changing that. A recently released tape recording of a conversation between one of Fine's alleged victims and the coach's wife, Laurie Davis, <a href=" http://espn.go.com/new-york/story/_/id/7286347/otl-audio-tape-syracuse-orange-assistant-bernie-fine-wife-admits-worries-abuse">appears to reveal</a> that she knew about her husband's inappropriate sexual behavior. (CNN reported that Davis will claim that the recording was <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/27/justice/syracuse-coach-allegations/index.html?sct=hp_t2_a6&amp;eref=sihp">doctored</a>.) Plenty have questioned whether Sandusky's wife, Dorothy, could have been entirely unaware of her husband's alleged abuse of boys over a 15-year period. The truth is that, should their husbands be found guilty, these women, along with Jasmine, are members of a unique and pained group; after all, the typical sexual abuser is a married man. How wives respond to the revelation of abuse varies greatly -- from reporting it immediately to convincing themselves, time after time, that it won't happen again. In plenty of cases, they aren't even aware that their husband was attracted to children in the first place, let alone that he would ever abuse a pre-pubescent child.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/married_to_a_pedophile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/married_to_a_pedophile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alan Dershowitz thinks Joe Paterno was treated unfairly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/alan_dershowitz_thinks_joe_paterno_was_treated_unfairly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/alan_dershowitz_thinks_joe_paterno_was_treated_unfairly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Dershowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Paterno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10248351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Penn State coach shouldn't be held responsible for the crimes of others, collective punishment advocate says]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, legal scholar Alan Dershowitz <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/is-paterno-getting-a-bum-_b_1101933.html">has weighed in</a> on the firing of longtime Penn State football coach Joe Paterno. It is practically a crime that we had to wait this long to hear what "The Dersh" has to say about the largely peripheral figure whose totally justified firing has subsumed most coverage of the horrific crimes alleged to have taken place under his watch. Here's Dershowitz's take: JoePa was treated unfairly, and he shouldn't be held responsible <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2011/11/dershowitz-defends-paterno-despite-demanding-collective-responsibility-for-palestinians.html">for crimes committed by his underling and covered up by his superiors.</a></p><p>Dershowitz's Harvard Legal Ethics class <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/is-paterno-getting-a-bum-_b_1101933.html">had a little debate</a> about the Penn State situation. They all agree that Paterno had no legal obligation to do anything after assistant coach Mike McQueary told Paterno that he saw defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky raping children in the locker room shower. But what about his moral obligations?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/alan_dershowitz_thinks_joe_paterno_was_treated_unfairly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/alan_dershowitz_thinks_joe_paterno_was_treated_unfairly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandusky admits &#8220;horsing around&#8221; but denies sex with kids</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/sandusky_admits_horsing_around_but_denies_sex_with_kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/sandusky_admits_horsing_around_but_denies_sex_with_kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10222090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On NBC's "Rock Center," the former Penn State coach said he "horsed around ...without intent of sexual contact"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="msnbc59c0d0" width="420" height="245" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=45298030&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="flashvars" value="launch=45298030&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="pluginspage" value="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /><embed id="msnbc59c0d0" width="420" height="245" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" flashvars="launch=45298030&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/sandusky_admits_horsing_around_but_denies_sex_with_kids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/sandusky_admits_horsing_around_but_denies_sex_with_kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child abuse: We&#8217;re making the problem worse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/child_abuse_were_making_the_problem_worse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/child_abuse_were_making_the_problem_worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10198453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts say America's approach to sex offenders only increases the likelihood that they will re-offend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The alleged Penn State sex abuse scandal may provide a powerful lesson about institutional corruption -- but it's also a good time for some self-examination. The general consensus among experts who treat sex offenders is that America has taken the wrong approach to dealing with child molesters. In fact, some say that we're only making the problem worse.</p><p>Just last week, the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse conference in Canada surveyed the latest research in the field. The narrative that <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/11/03/health-care-approach-better-at-curbing-sex-abuse-than-jail-expert/">emerged from the meeting</a> is that we should place a stronger emphasis on something proved to actually <em>reduce</em> the recidivism rate: treatment. The potential for bias here is apparent -- it's like incarceration experts highlighting the importance of incarceration -- but studies show that treatment, particularly group approaches, can be highly effective. (Although, as a <a href="http://sax.sagepub.com/content/21/4/412.short">2009 report</a> put it, "Despite these advances we, as a field, continue to fall well short of the community's expectation of 'no more victims.'")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/child_abuse_were_making_the_problem_worse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/13/child_abuse_were_making_the_problem_worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why didn&#8217;t McQueary call the police?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/why_didnt_mcqueary_call_the_police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/why_didnt_mcqueary_call_the_police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10199771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penn State's assistant coach allegedly saw a boy's rape but didn't intervene. An expert explains why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a question many are asking as more details emerge from the Penn State scandal: How could you see a child being sexually abused and not intervene?</p><p>As a 28-year-old grad student, assistant coach Mike McQueary, now on administrative leave, claims he witnessed Jerry Sandusky raping a 10-year-old boy in the locker room showers. McQueary immediately called his own father to tell him what he'd seen, according to the <a href=" http://cbschicago.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/sandusky-grand-jury-presentment.pdf">grand jury report</a>, but waited until the next morning to notify coach Joe Paterno. Even given the powerful institutional hierarchy within the school's football program, which some have gone so far as to compare to the Catholic Church, most find it difficult to imagine standing by as a pre-pubescent boy is allegedly sodomized by a middle-aged man -- no matter who that man is.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/why_didnt_mcqueary_call_the_police/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/why_didnt_mcqueary_call_the_police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>195</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s more than pulled pigtails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/its_more_than_pulled_pigtails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/its_more_than_pulled_pigtails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10174512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women share their memories of playground sexual harassment in response to a study finding it's still prevalent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first sexual memory is of being cornered on the playground in second grade. A boy, whose face is but a blur now, chased me to an isolated part of the yard, pinned me against a wall with a hand on either side of my head and started making exaggerated humping movements while chanting the title line from Color Me Badd's "I wanna sex you up" – it was 1992. I managed to duck under his arm and ran off.</p><p>Turns out I'm far from alone in experiencing such early unwanted advances. On Monday, a study finding that sexual harassment between peers is widespread in grade school started making the rounds, and the New York Times' coverage swiftly climbed the most-emailed list. The survey, conducted by the American Association of University Women (AAUW), found that almost half of seventh to 12th graders had been sexually harassed during the last school year. Girls were the most frequent target of "unwelcome sexual behavior," but 40 percent of boys had experienced such an incident in the last year. The news has predictably stirred up significant media attention – the topic of kids and sex always does – but the phenomenon itself is hardly new. For decades now, countless studies have shown this to be a problem, and yet the message doesn't seem to stick.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/its_more_than_pulled_pigtails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/its_more_than_pulled_pigtails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nick Kristof to the rescue!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10172085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a New York Times columnist live tweets a Cambodia brothel raid, who benefits -- the women or the reporter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof <a href="http://storify.com/johnmichaelnash/kristof-reports-on-brothel-raid">live-tweeted</a> a brothel raid in Cambodia. Kristof's novel approaches to international women-rights reporting have previously included purchasing two Cambodian underage prostitutes for the purpose of liberating them and <a href="http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/is-it-ever-ok-to-name-rape-victims/#more-4159">naming</a> a 9-year-old Congolese rape victim. After those generated criticism from victims' advocates, Kristof shouldn't be surprised that not everyone was cheering along his recent outing.</p><p>The narrative proceeded in a familiar fashion: There were villains, even some with military ties; then there is a rescue. Kristof tweeted, "Girls are rescued, but still very scared Youngest looks about 13, trafficked from Vietnam." And then, "Social workers comforting the girls, telling them they are free, won't be punished, rapes are over." He was accompanied by Cambodian anti-trafficking <a href="http://www.somaly.org/about-smf/somaly-mam">activist</a> and forced-prostitution survivor Somaly Mam. Post-presidential niece Lauren Bush <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LaurenBushTweet/status/133535869687709696">chimed</a> in perkily, "Awesome reporting by @NickKristof as the (sic) raided a brothel in Cambodia with @SomalyMam this morning!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex offenders: Halloween&#8217;s boogeyman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/sex_offenders_halloweens_boogeyman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/sex_offenders_halloweens_boogeyman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10160028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Registered abusers are being rounded up tonight to protect trick-or-treaters. How real is the threat, though?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As costumed kiddies take to the streets tonight, thousands of sex offenders across the country will be forced to turn off their lights and refuse to answer the door. Some will be required to also post "no candy" signs and refrain from decorating their yards. Some counties round them up for a mandatory movie night or an evening in jail. In some areas with prohibitively strict residency requirements, police will be rounding up <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2011/10/operation-boo-round-homeless-sex-offenders-halloween">several hundred transient sex offenders.</a></p><p>Year after year, new measures are introduced to keep registered sex offenders of all stripes from coming into contact with trick-or-treaters -- and yet there is zero evidence to support the legislative trend. In fact, the available data suggest it's a useless diversion of resources that creates a false sense of security. Just take a look at this absurdly misleading headline from a Fox News affiliate: <a href="http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/police-work-to-keep-halloween-free-from-sexual-predators-103111#ixzz1cOc5XwsG">"Police Work to Keep Halloween Free From Sexual Predators."</a> (Because all sex offenders faithfully register and offenses are only committed by those with previous records?) Meanwhile, other outlets are playing up the danger: Albuquerque's KRQE <a href=" http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/news_links/beware-of-real-monsters-on-halloween">advises</a> readers to "beware of real monsters on Halloween," and talks to a 12-year-old girl who is "excited to go Trick-or-Treating" -- but only because her family has no idea that they live "in a neighborhood full of secrets." <em>Dun-dun-dun.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/sex_offenders_halloweens_boogeyman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/sex_offenders_halloweens_boogeyman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was a &#8220;Real World&#8221; star raped by her castmates?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10152777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest reality-TV horror, Tanya Cooley claims producers kept cameras rolling as she was sexually assaulted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(updated below)</strong></p><p>Tonya Cooley is a former "Real World Chicago" and "Real World/Road Rules Challenge" cast member. She's been a Playboy "Cybergirl of the Week," has worked with the Girls Gone Wild team, and done a little <a href="http://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/archives/the_real_world_chicago/2007_Feb_13_tonya_cooley_cinemax ">Cinemax softcore</a>. And absolutely none of that means that she wasn't raped.</p><p>Two years after filming her "Real World/Road Rules" season, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/10/27/real-world-contestant-sues-sexual-abuse-rape-toothbrush-lawsuit-mtv/#.TqqMg1aXTkY ">Cooley has filed suit </a>against MTV, Bunim/Murray Productions, and her former castmates Kenneth Santucci and Evan Starkman, claming that Santucci and Starkman sexually abused her while the show's producers did nothing to intervene. Instead, she alleges, they just kept the cameras rolling. She says her castmates "took another male participant's toothbrush and rubbed the toothbrush around plaintiff's genitals, including rubbing her labia and inserting the toothbrush into plaintiff's vagina." She further alleges that male cast members were goaded to "inappropriately touch female cast members' bodies, including in intimate areas." MTV and "The Real World" and the "Challenge" producers Bunim/Murray have so far not commented on the case.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What constitutes rape?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/fbi_rape_definition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/fbi_rape_definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An FBI definition excludes a wide range of sexual assaults, including ones against men. That might finally change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For nearly a decade, Carol Tracy, the executive director of the <a href="http://www.womenslawproject.org/">Women's Law Project</a>, has been agitating for a change in what she describes as the FBI's &#160;"archaic" definition of rape.</p><p>This month, the agency made a major step forward to doing just that.</p><p>At a meeting in Washington last Friday, members of the <a href="http://www.policeforum.org/">Police Executive Research Forum</a> (PERF), including representatives from police agencies in Chicago, Baltimore and Philadelphia, came together with FBI officials and victims' advocates to discuss the importance of broadening the definition of a crime that most experts believe is significantly underestimated by the FBI's <a href="http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/about/about_ucr.html">Uniform Crime Report</a> (UCR).</p><p>Currently, the only sexual assault the UCR collects data on is "forcible rape," which it defines as "the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." &#160;Because "carnal knowledge" is defined as penetration of the penis into the vagina, the definition excludes oral and anal rape, as well as assaults with foreign objects. It also excludes male rape.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/fbi_rape_definition/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/fbi_rape_definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining pedophilia with pedophiles&#8217; help</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pedophilia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pedophilia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/08/17/pedophilia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Minor-attracted persons" say we need to rethink how the mental illness is defined -- and some experts agree]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We usually hear pedophilia talked about in terms of mental illness -- if not evil -- but Aug. 17 a motley crew of self-identified "minor-attracted persons" and mental health professionals have gathered in Baltimore to talk about it as a sexual identity. At hand is an issue deeply important to both groups: the revision of the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia.</p><p>The sponsor of the event, B4U-ACT, a support group aimed at preventing pedophiles from acting on their attraction to children, hopes to influence the relevant entry in the upcoming revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Understandably, the idea of pedophiles helping to define their own mental illness has some unnerved. Earlier this week, the Daily Caller <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/15/conference-aims-to-normalize-pedophilia/">wrote</a> about the event in a piece headlined, "Conference aims to normalize pedophilia." It's true that many in the community believe that attraction to pubescent or pre-pubescent children isn't a mental illness at all, but the symposium itself has the stated aim of raising awareness about fundamental problems with <a href="http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=186">the proposed revision</a> to the DSM's entry on pedophilia.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pedophilia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pedophilia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the rapist is a she</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/male_rape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/male_rape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/08/02/male_rape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A child support case brings to light a man's rape accusation against his high school girlfriend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a man be raped by a woman? That's the question that popped up in my Twitter feed in response to <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/he-says-he-said-no-to-sex-now-says-no-to-child-support/1183449">a news story</a> about a man in Florida who is fighting child support payments by claiming that his 4-year-old son was conceived when his then-girlfriend forced herself on him. That the question even has to be asked shows how limited our understanding is of sexual assault.</p><p>At the time, Kris Bucher was only 17 and his girlfriend, Jessica Fuller, was 18 -- but he isn't claiming sexual assault on statutory grounds. Bucher says Fuller climbed on top of him in the back seat of a car, held him down as he repeatedly said "no" and raped him. According to the St. Petersburg Times, "He said he tried to push Jessica off [but she was heavier than him]. He said he tried to pull the door handle to open the car door. He said she slammed her hand over the lock. He said it was over pretty fast."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/male_rape/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/male_rape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>181</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Congressman David Wu says he&#8217;s resigning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/us_wu_sex_scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/us_wu_sex_scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/26/us_wu_sex_scandal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratic leaders had called for a  House Ethics investigation into sexual misconduct allegations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Rep. David Wu of Oregon has announced that he is resigning in the wake of allegations that he had a sexual encounter with an 18-year-old woman.</p><p>Democratic leaders had called for a House Ethics investigation after the initial reports of the allegation. Wu had said that whatever occurred was consensual.</p><p>Wu said Tuesday the well-being of his children should come first, so he will resign after Congress resolves the debate over the debt ceiling.</p><p>Wu, 56, has won seven terms. In 2004, he won despite acknowledging a decades-old college incident in which he tried to force a former girlfriend to have sex. Voters said they disliked an opponent's attempt to use that against Wu as part of a political campaign.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>Rep. David Wu of Oregon was being pressured to leave Congress sooner rather than later after the House Democratic leader sought an investigation into a young woman's allegation that she had an unwanted sexual encounter with him.</p><p>Wu, 56, a seven-term Democrat from Portland whose unusual behavior had been the subject of news stories earlier in the year, has said the encounter was consensual. Still, his office announced Monday that he would not seek re-election in 2012.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/us_wu_sex_scandal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/us_wu_sex_scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the next congressman to leave in shame will be&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/david_wu_career_death_knell_ethics_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/david_wu_career_death_knell_ethics_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/25/david_wu_career_death_knell_ethics_probe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the face of disturbing sexual misconduct allegations, Oregon's David Wu hasn't resigned -- yet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. David Wu (D-Ore.) has made a number of unpredictable career moves in the past year: He sent his staffers a series of strange emails, including a photo of <a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/212374/oregon-democrat-david-wus-bizarre-tiger-suit-photo">himself grinning in a tiger costume;</a> he was kept from going to events during his reelection campaign, owing to erratic behavior; and he then publicly announced that he was seeking professional help for mental health issues.</p><p>Now, however, his political career has taken an all-too-predictable path: Top House Democrats are calling for the Ethics Committee to investigate him on allegations of sexual misconduct. And, like Rep. Anthony Weiner did just weeks before him, Wu is refusing to step down, despite calls for his resignation.</p><p>The seven-term congressman has been accused of engaging in an "aggressive and unwanted sexual encounter" last Thanksgiving with the teenage daughter of a longtime friend and campaign donor. Although refusing to resign, Wu's adviser has said the congressman will not run for reelection in 2012. Wu gave a brief comment on the accusations:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/david_wu_career_death_knell_ethics_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/david_wu_career_death_knell_ethics_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DSK maid goes public</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/dsk_maid_diallo_speaks_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/dsk_maid_diallo_speaks_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/25/dsk_maid_diallo_speaks_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nafissatou Diallo -- named for the first time in U.S. press -- says she wants the former IMF chief to go to jail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the French media disclosed Nafissatou Diallo's name weeks ago, in the American press she has been known only as "Dominique Strauss-Kahn's accuser" or the "DSK maid" -- until now.</p><p>Guinean-born Diallo, who goes by "Nafi," spoke out about her sexual assault charges against the former IMF chief, first in a lengthy <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2011/07/24/dsk-maid-tells-of-her-alleged-rape-by-strauss-kahn-exclusive.print.html">Newsweek interview</a> and then in <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/dominique-strauss-kahns-accuser-speaks/story?id=14150192">an interview with ABC's Robin Roberts</a>, which aired Monday on "Good Morning America."</p><p>"I want him to go to jail. I want him to know there are some places you cannot use your power, you cannot use your money," Diallo told Newsweek. She repeated a similar sentiment to Roberts.</p><p>ABC's Roberts called Diallo's media blitz "an unusual and risky move." But Diallo and her team are trying to regain control over the narrative after several weeks of stories in which her background and credibility have been questioned. "Because of him they call me a prostitute," Diallo told ABC.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/dsk_maid_diallo_speaks_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/dsk_maid_diallo_speaks_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is violent sex OK?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/19/consent_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/19/consent_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominique Strauss-Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/07/19/consent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report of a woman's "brutal" but "consensual" encounter with Dominique Strauss-Kahn raises a crucial question]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest allegation in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn saga has sex educators worried. Some fear it delivers a dangerous message about rough sex and consent.</p><p>The French weekly L'Express reports that Anne Mansouret -- the mother of Tristane Banon, the journalist accusing the former IMF chief of attempted rape -- told Parisian investigators that she had sex with DSK three years before the alleged incident with her daughter. (Cue <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/saletan/status/93304582024855552">classy quips</a> about how IMF really "stands for International Mother F---er.")</p><p>Mansouret, according to the newspaper, described to officials sex that was "consensual but clearly brutal." L'Express reported that she told authorities Strauss-Kahn behaved like an "obscene" (or "lewd," depending on your translation) soldier. The newspaper also claims that she "describes DSK as a predator who isn't looking to please but to take, and behaves like an obscene boor. Sexual lust makes him want to dominate."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/19/consent_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/19/consent_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Dawkins: Skeptic of women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famed nonbeliever goes after a female blogger for complaining about a creepy encounter with a male atheist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Dawkins, the atheist almighty, has in a fury thrown some rhetorical thunderbolts at someone he disagrees with. This wouldn't be in the least bit surprising except for the fact that his disagreement isn't over the existence of a higher being or the significance of religion. No, he's pissed off that a female atheist has dared to&#160;complain about unwanted advances from a male nonbeliever.</p><p>It all started with a <a href="http://skepchick.org/2011/06/about-mythbusters-robot-eyes-feminism-and-jokes/">video blog</a> from Rebecca Watson, founder of Skepchick, about her experience at an atheist conference last month in Dublin. She participated in a panel in which she talked about the problem of sexism among atheists, and the rape threats she had received from men in the community who don't agree with her. Importantly, Dawkins was on the panel and the guy who went on to hit on her was in the audience. Afterward, she went to the hotel bar with conference-goers until 4 a.m., when she told everyone that she was tired and wanted to go to bed. A male attendee followed her out of the bar and into the elevator, where he said, "Don't take this the wrong way, but I find you very interesting and I would like to talk more. Would you like to come to my hotel room for coffee?" This is what she had to say about the encounter:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/atheist_flirting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>502</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

