<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sexual assualt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sexual_assualt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:40:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California court: Victim wasn&#8217;t married, rape conviction reversed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assualt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man found guilty of raping a sleeping woman gets a new trial, as a consent statute doesn't protect single people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Feb. 20, 2009, an 18-year-old woman fell asleep in her bed with her boyfriend and woke up in the dark to find herself being penetrated by another man. Yesterday, a California court reversed the rape conviction of that man, Julio Morales, because the victim wasn't married to her boyfriend.</p><p>This is both less and more outrageous than it sounds, and gets to a legal problem <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1358546">beyond</a> the disturbing particulars of this case: whether consent under false pretenses is consent at all.</p><p>Before anger rains down solely on the three-judge panel from California's court of appeals, let's be clear here: One, the prosecutor screwed up by misapplying California's rape laws, and two, California's 19th-century rape laws still on the books are partly to blame. Still, the judges <a href="http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B233796.PDF">chose to interpret</a> the law as strictly as possible, reversing the entire conviction and instructing the court to retry the case on a more limited basis.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/california_court_victim_wasnt_married_rape_conviction_reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
