<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sitcoms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sitcoms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Two and a Half Men&#8217;s&#8221; latest sexist dis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/two_and_a_half_mens_latest_sexist_dis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/two_and_a_half_mens_latest_sexist_dis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two and a Half Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12787601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The co-creator of fart-joke staple "Two and a Half Men" is tired of all the punch lines about female anatomy on TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Aronsohn is sorry he said he was tired of your vaginas. As you were, ladies.</p><p>On Monday, the co-creator of "Two and a Half Men" issued a now-standard Twitter mea culpa, explaining that <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/BennyAce/status/186877046474031104">"it was a stupid joke. I'm sorry."</a> His offense? Kvetching on Sunday to the Hollywood Reporter, "Enough, ladies. I get it. You have periods … We are approaching peak vagina on television, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lee-aronsohn-ashton-kutcher-two-and-a-half-men-306787">the point of labia saturation." </a>Labia saturation: no longer just a weird side effect from antidepressants.</p><p>It has indeed been a banner year for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/vagina_sitcom_season/">vaginas on television</a>, with one-liners about the holy of holies turning up all over the place -- including on saucy, female-driven comedies like "Whitney" and "Two Broke Girls." The truth is that few of these jokes are legitimately funny. They're more often deployed to shock, and thereby make lame routines notable. Surely Aronsohn isn't the only one feeling a little exhausted by the V-word.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/two_and_a_half_mens_latest_sexist_dis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/two_and_a_half_mens_latest_sexist_dis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The great sitcom divide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_great_sitcom_divide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_great_sitcom_divide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Are You There Chelsea?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chelsea Handler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12205431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once you\'ve grown used to adventurous shows like \"30 Rock\" and \"Louie,\" the traditional sitcom feels like a relic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a recent episode of "2 Broke Girls," the following writing somehow made it onto television:</p><p><em>(Waitress to dissatisfied customer)</em></p><p><strong>Waitress: </strong>Would you like to see the menu again?</p><p><strong>Customer:</strong> This is crap, I wanted Muenster.</p><p><strong>Waitress: </strong>Well, I wanted to be running a Fortune 500 company instead of waiting on a toxic man-child like yourself. But we can't always get what we want, so order something else, put it in your pie hole and get on with your damn life.</p><p>- - - - - - - - - -</p><p>I hadn’t realized my taste in comedy was so elitist until I watched some of the new multi-camera sitcoms and observed what I had assumed was an already long-dead form of comedy. When I say “new,” I’m referring to multi-camera shows that have persisted <em>after</em> the advent/rise of the single-camera sitcom. If, like me, you've spent recent years watching "30 Rock," "Arrested Development," "Louie" and "Curb Your Enthusiasm," it's a completely different experience to tune into talked-about shows like "Whitney," "2 Broke Girls" and "Are You There, Chelsea?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_great_sitcom_divide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_great_sitcom_divide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Television&#039;s season of the vagina</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/vagina_sitcom_season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/vagina_sitcom_season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The once-taboo word enters heavy sitcom rotation. If this is a victory for women, why don't the jokes seem funnier?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long ago, vaginas were barely acknowledged in prime time. Mary Richards and Laverne and Shirley never mentioned theirs. Even Carrie Bradshaw only gave hers a few passing nods. And while "Grey's Anatomy" turned "vajayjay" into a euphemism a few seasons ago, this year, there's very little pussy-footing around. Vagina! Cue laugh track!</p><p>It's a big year for the vagina, which has been asserting its presence as the go-to punchline for months now. It's been lightheartedly hailed as the "center of civilization" (sorry, Williamsburg) in one <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/07/19/summers_eve/index.html" class="storyLink">Summer's Eve douche campaign</a> and turned into your sassy, <a href="http://www.regretsy.com/2011/07/19/if-these-walls-could-talk/">vaguely racist BFF</a> in another. Last month, Olivia Wilde one-upped Jennifer Love Hewitt's <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/01/15/love_hewitt_vajazzle" class="storyLink">now legendary explanation of vajazzling</a> by describing her favorite "vagina tattoo" on "Conan."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/vagina_sitcom_season/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/26/vagina_sitcom_season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The retro sexism of &#8220;Whitney&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/whitney_cummings_retro_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/whitney_cummings_retro_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/09/19/whitney_cummings_retro_sexist</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new sitcom trots out the battle of the sexes -- circa "Three's Company." Who's ready for more cellulite jokes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies, don't you just hate it when you're ovulating? And guys are, like, not? Am I riiiiiiight?</p><p>It hasn't even premiered yet, but Whitney Cummings' aggressively promoted new sitcom may just be the most unself-awarely retro-sexist show on television. And in a season that's giving us Playboy bunnies, sexy stewardesses and Charlie's Freaking Angels, that's quite an accomplishment.</p><p>As you likely already know from the deluge of magazine ads, billboards and canned laughter-heavy promos, "Whitney" is about a woman who's happily unmarried to her scruffy yet adorable boyfriend. But lest you think this is some subversive takedown of biological clocks and enforced monogamy, the jokes about how a woman's "silent treatment" isn't really a punishment -- probably not. Previews for "Whitney" include -- I am not kidding -- references to Cosmopolitan magazine, cupcakes, being "whipped," and whether or not men are like cavemen. There are also references to cellulite, looking fat, her period, and what women "really mean" when they talk. As <a href="http://www.bestweekever.tv/2011-09-15/whitney-cummings-posters/">Best Week Ever exasperatedly points out</a>, the show's campaign might as well read, "Blah blah blah shopping. Blah blah blah PMS. Blah blah blah weight issues."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/whitney_cummings_retro_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/whitney_cummings_retro_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Corner: All culture is devious propaganda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/tv_national_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/tv_national_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/17/tv_national_review</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberals have been destroying the American family 30 minutes at a time, according to Ben Shapiro]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How weird and sad life must be when viewed through the eyes of Ben Shapiro, pop-culture warrior-in-residence at the National Review. It is his job to pretend (or, good lord, actually <em>believe</em>) that everything that appears on your TV set -- not just the news bits, but the cartoons and toothpaste commercials and laugh-tracked situation comedies -- is part of a liberal plot to destroy the American family. <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/269950/top-ten-tv-dads-ben-shapiro">Here is</a> a fun pop culture listicle, "The Top Ten TV Dads," <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/269950/top-ten-tv-dads-ben-shapiro">done the National Review way:</a> "It&#8217;s instructive because we can see the transformation of fatherhood on television reflecting the left-wing bias against traditional family roles." Oh, can we?</p><p>Ward Cleaver is the best. Mike Brady is <em>ok</em>, but with a caveat: "We&#8217;re already moving into the era of alternative family structures...." It seems likely that Shapiro has never <em>watched</em> half these shows, but did perhaps thumb through a TV Guide or flip past Nick at Nite in the early '90s:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/tv_national_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/tv_national_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC picks up four new comedies, loses &#8220;Outsourced&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/nbc_new_comedy_handler_bffs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/nbc_new_comedy_handler_bffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chelsea Handler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/13/nbc_new_comedy_handler_bffs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Prepon is Chelsea Handler (kind of), Amanda Peet's in love with the help, and the return of Buffy's Giles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been a good week for "That 70's Show" alumni. First Ashton Kutcher got himself the world's sweetest gig taking over for Charlie Sheen on "Two and a Half Men," and now Laura Prepon (Donna) <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/nbc-continues-pickup-spree-chelsea-188089">has just snagged the lead in one of NBC's four new comedies</a>.</p><p>"Are You There, Vodka? It's Me, Chelsea" has been adapted from Chelsea Handler's memoir <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/13/are-you-there-vodka-its-me-chelsea-handler-nbc-series_n_861699.html">into a scripted sitcom starring Prepon as Handler</a>. So was Elizabeth Banks not available, or is there just a rule against appearing on too many NBC sitcoms in one year? Because as much as I loved her as Donna, I'm not sure Prepon can pull off Chelsea's wackiness.</p><p>Meanwhile, three other shows have been picked for the peacock's lineup, including "Free Agents," an American remake of a British comedy about the romantic lives of P.R. executives. Exciting! Hank Azaria and Kathryn Hahn star in the Americanized version along with Anthony Head (Giles from "Buffy"), <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/anthony-head-reprise-role-nbc-170637">who will be reprising his role from the original series</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/nbc_new_comedy_handler_bffs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/nbc_new_comedy_handler_bffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can &#8220;Two and a Half Men&#8221; be saved?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/two_and_half_men_replacement_lorre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/two_and_half_men_replacement_lorre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/29/two_and_half_men_replacement_lorre</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Charlie Sheen out of the picture, producer Chuck Lorre hopes to find a big-name replacement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Lorre may be down, but he hasn't given up: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/chuck-lorre-hatches-two-a-183300">The CBS producer has supposedly been in talks with Jon Cryer about continuing "Two and a Half Men" in Charlie Sheen's absence</a>. If the show continues, it won't be with the huge-name talent of Woody Harrelson, Jeremy Piven or Bob Saget, according to a spokesperson at Warner Bros., who confirms that none of those actors are in the running.</p><p>I'm wondering if <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2011/03/charlie-sheen-rob-lowe-john-stamos-dan-patrick.html">Rob Lowe is still on this list</a>, as he'd probably make for the best contestant to fill Sheen's shoes. Not in the same role, of course, but Rob could easily turn on the charm and carefree charisma that Sheen brought to his "Charlie" character. And what's more, the actors grew up together. (Hello, "<a href="http://www.salon.com/books/2011/04/25/rob_lowe_memoir_review">Stories I Only Tell My Friends!</a>")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/two_and_half_men_replacement_lorre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/two_and_half_men_replacement_lorre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 year time capsule: &#8220;That&#8217;s My Bush!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/10_year_time_capsule_thats_my_bush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/10_year_time_capsule_thats_my_bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 year time capsule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/03/29/10_year_time_capsule_thats_my_bush</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We look back at the "South Park" guys' subversive series, which went places even "The Daily Show" wouldn't dare now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you will about Trey Parker and Matt Stone, but those guys have had our number for a long time. Way before they were doing <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/03/25/book_of_mormon_trey_parker_matt_stone_broadway_review/index.html">feel-good musicals on Broadway about Mormons in AIDS-stricken Uganda</a>, when "South Park" was still mostly known for its Mr. Hanky scatological humor, the satiric duo had taken on a project for Comedy Central that would be unthinkable today: a half-hour sitcom about the president, whose famous catchphrase was "One of these days, Laura, I'm going to punch you in the face!"</p><p>Oh yes, welcome to the month that was "That's My Bush."</p><p>
    <iframe frameborder="0" height="300" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/4372159" width="400"></iframe>
  </p><p>
    <a href="http://vimeo.com/4372159"><br />
      <br />
    </a>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/10_year_time_capsule_thats_my_bush/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/10_year_time_capsule_thats_my_bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your feminist guide to fall TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/fall_tv_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/fall_tv_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/05/21/fall_tv_women</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among networks' many new offerings, a couple of shows promise some real lady-power]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The networks held their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upfront">upfronts</a> this week, that beloved dog-and-pony show that baits advertisers into thinking each new show is going to make 'em a zillion dollars. The nets trot out their big stars -- spin, spin, spin, rinse and repeat. This means it's also the time of year when I sit down and scrutinize the offerings for signs of surreptitious feminism in the form of -- gasp! -- female leads in the new lineups. I consider a show to be female-friendly if a star is a woman, or if the ensemble cast has more than two women.&#160;I know, low standards, right?&#160;</p><p>The thing is, no matter how advanced the portrayals of women and girls on TV get, there's always the wife-mother trap that can box a female character in. Yes, wives and moms are biologically women. But wives and moms are also people, with interests beyond the parent-teacher conference or the laundry or the impact their husband's job has on their credit limits. If the wife on-screen always has a whisk or basket of clothes to fold or a shopping bag in her hands, I don't think it counts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/fall_tv_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/fall_tv_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Valentine&#8217;s Day&#8221;: The pain of L.A.&#8217;s gorgeous and lovelorn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/valentines_day_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/valentines_day_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/02/11/valentines_day</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garry Marshall's holiday rom-com made me want to flee to a happier place -- like an Iranian prison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, there's really no motion-picture genre that is less suited to a long-winded, episodic, career-wrapping, would-be epic than the romantic comedy. I mean, OK, "A Midsummer Night's Dream" has rom-com elements, and so does its most famous cinematic knockoff, Ingmar Bergman's "Smiles of a Summer Night." Unfortunately for Garry Marshall, the director-impresario of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2001/08/03/princess/">"The Princess Diaries"</a> and "Pretty Woman" and many other film and TV comedies across a 40-odd-year career, he seems to have those one-day-in-the-life-of-love examples dimly in view in <a href="http://www.valentinesdaymovie.com">"Valentine's Day,"</a> a sprawling, listless, ensemble-cast tribute to his own comic genius.</p><p>At the risk of being both pompous and blindingly obvious, Marshall is not exactly Bergman, or Shakespeare either. Neither of those guys, as far as I know, ever tried to drag laughs out of a resolutely unfunny production with gags about cute puppies spurning a newly jilted lover or 2-year-olds kissing each other or Ashton Kutcher driving a purple, early-'60s Chevy low-rider badly through Los Angeles traffic. (That last is absolutely slanderous: I'm saying here and now that Ashton can roll low, slow and smooth when the situation demands.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/valentines_day_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/valentines_day_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wasted older women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/29/boozy_grandmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/29/boozy_grandmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/12/29/boozy_grandmas</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Boozy grandma" characters are all over TV, but it would be nice if veteran actresses had more to do]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's notoriously difficult for actresses of a certain age to get work in Hollywood, but <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/12/28/drinking.grandmothers/index.html?eref=rss_topstories&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_topstories+(RSS%3A+Top+Stories)">CNN's Breeanna Hare</a> notes that if you're an older white woman who looks suitably patrician, opportunities abound in the "boozy grandma" role that seems to be featured in every other TV show these days. Veteran actresses Kelly Bishop, Holland Taylor, Caroline Lagerfelt and Jessica Walter have all recently played such three-martini matriarchs &#8212; I'd add Susan Sullivan, currently working out her elbow on "Castle," to that list &#8212; and now Susan Sarandon has brought the type to the big screen in "The Lovely Bones."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/29/boozy_grandmas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/29/boozy_grandmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why &#8220;The Simpsons&#8221; no longer matters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/john_ortved_simpsons_anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/john_ortved_simpsons_anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2009/12/16/john_ortved_simpsons_anniversary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expert discusses the cartoon's cultural demise -- and far-reaching impact]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a difference 20 years makes! On Dec. 17, 1989, the still-infant Fox Broadcasting Co. aired the first episode of "The Simpsons," the animated show about a dysfunctional family from Springfield that has since become the longest-running prime-time series in American history. It's hard to overstate the show's impact. It has spawned a merchandising empire (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Simpsons-Homer-Remote-Air-Freshener/dp/B000GKCUPW">"Simpsons" air freshener</a>, anyone?), been at the center of a culture war (Barbara Bush called it &#8220;the dumbest thing I&#8217;d ever seen&#8221;) and inspired a&#160;<a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2007/07/27/simpsons/index.html">hit movie</a> (not to mention comedy writers' rooms everywhere). Plus, "d'oh!" is now in the dictionary.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/john_ortved_simpsons_anniversary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/john_ortved_simpsons_anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Middle&#8221; just middling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/abc_the_middle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/abc_the_middle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2009/09/30/abc_the_middle</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patricia Heaton's Midwestern matriarch is sometimes funny, but ultimately too manic and silly to embrace]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC's <strong>"The Middle"</strong> (premieres 8:30 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 30),<strong>&#160;</strong>a comedy about living in the nondescript middle part of the country, resides somewhere in the nondescript middle of the pack of new fall comedies.</p><p>For a slapsticky sitcom about a Midwestern family filled with misfits, "The Middle" is better than you'd expect. But compared to this fall's surprisingly good new comedies &#8211; NBC's <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/feature/2009/09/01/community/index.html">"Community,"</a> Fox's <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/review/2009/09/08/glee/index.html">"Glee,"</a> ABC's <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/review/2009/09/23/modern_family/index.html">"Modern Family"</a> and HBO's <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2009/09/10/bored_to_death/index.html">"Bored to Death"</a> -- "The Middle" is middling at best.</p><p>But that doesn't mean you shouldn't give it a shot. The pilot certainly has its charms, most of them centering around matriarch Frankie Heck's (Patricia Heaton) continual frustration with her not very charismatic, distinctly untalented, at times downright weird kids. Of her youngest, Brick, she says, "You know how you think giving a kid a cool name will make him cool? Well, it doesn't." Brick is nerdy. He whispers to himself. His backpack is his best friend. At a parent conference, his teacher wonders out loud whether he's just quirky or "clinically quirky":</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/abc_the_middle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/abc_the_middle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best new TV: &#8220;Modern Family&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/modern_family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/modern_family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2009/09/23/modern_family</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look, Mom! A dysfunctional family sitcom that's actually funny!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Families are funny. Sitcoms about families are not.</p><p>Or, at least that has been the case since "Arrested Development" went off the air. Saddled with dozens of hackneyed shows trying desperately to match the wit of "Everybody Loves Raymond" but failing miserably, viewers have become so bored with the same old family shtick that many of the most successful comedies, from "30 Rock" to "The Office," are now set in the workplace.</p><p>ABC's "Modern Family" (premieres 9 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 23) borrows a thing or two from those shows -- the single-camera format, the use of a faux-documentary style where characters speak directly to the audience, the frequent veering into farce. That said, this dysfunctional family comedy really is its own unique, brilliant gem, shining among an otherwise uncomfortably mediocre haul of cheap comedic rhinestones.</p><p>Be forewarned, though. The first scene -- teenage daughter leaves house in slutty outfit -- might give the impression that this is just another bad parade of parenting clich&#233;s. But don't touch that remote, because things get very funny, very quickly, particularly from the moment that Phil (Ty Burrell), father of three, tries to act as if he speaks the same hip slang as his daughter's new suitor.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/modern_family/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/modern_family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bureaucracy made hilarious</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/12/richter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/12/richter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/diary/2002/12/12/richter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox's absurd-yet-true office comedy "Andy Richter Controls the Universe" makes other sitcoms look as if they're die-stamped by robots. (Which they are.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> "Andy Richter Controls the Universe," which airs Tuesdays at 8:30 p.m. on Fox, is an absurdist office comedy about a doughy technical writer named Andy (Andy Richter) who works for a huge Chicago conglomerate called Pickering Industries. Andy spends most of his time at the office, which means he actually spends most of his time in his head, rescuing all the colorless moments that make up the better part of his life from the yawning pit of workaday meaninglessness. </p><p>His fantasy life is no less pedestrian that his regular life. If anything, it's almost more so. Most of Andy's thoughts -- which run along the lines of "And then, we were all replaced by a breed of genetically engineered superdogs," or "I wish I'd said that. I'm such a jerk. And I'm 30 pounds overweight" -- are heavily influenced by dumb movies and routine self-loathing. The result is absurdly hilarious. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/12/richter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/12/richter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amy Sedaris digs wigs and baking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/sedaris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/sedaris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/05/05/sedaris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The star of "Strangers With Candy" likes "small woodland creatures" and wants to play Angie
                    Dickinson as "Police Woman."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he TV roundup of your local paper might<br />
list <a<br />
href="/ent/col/mill/1999/04/05/strangers/index.html">"Strangers With Candy"</a><br />
as a sitcom, but to assume that this<br />
implies the show bears any relation to<br />
something like "Home Improvement" or<br />
"The Nanny" would be a grave mistake.</p><p>When "Strangers" first aired two years<br />
ago as a piss-take on those weepy "After<br />
School Specials" of the '70s, the show<br />
tipped the scales with a warped wit<br />
rarely encountered on the small screen.<br />
Now, signed on for a third season on<br />
Comedy Central, "Strangers" remains a<br />
trusted outpost for those who find their<br />
funny well beyond the standard sitcom<br />
fare.</p><p>At center stage of the show is actress<br />
Amy Sedaris, who plays the rumpled<br />
chum-pot Jerri Blank. Blank is a former<br />
teen runaway who, after a lifetime of<br />
prostitution and drug abuse, has<br />
returned to high school as a freshman at<br />
age 46. With the possible exception of a<br />
special trailer park edition of "Cops,"<br />
"Strangers" is the only place one is<br />
likely to encounter someone like Jerri<br />
Blank.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/sedaris/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/sedaris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nights of the living dead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/07/mary_homicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/07/mary_homicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/mill/2000/02/07/mary_homicide</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Homicide: The Movie" brings the canceled, classic cop show back for a final bow; "Mary and Rhoda": Do not resuscitate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n a December column about the trippiness of watching long-dead actors and once-popular TV characters cavorting eternally in reruns on TV Land and the Game Show Channel, the San Francisco Chronicle's <a target="new" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/12/15/DD73959.DTL">Jon Carroll</a> wrote (only a little bit facetiously), "You know the last scene in 'Titanic,' where the door opens on the ghostly underwater ship and all the passengers are there again to greet you, to smile and nod and say, yes, we still live, welcome home, welcome to the changeless world of memory?"</p><p>I know what he means. And you will too, when you watch "Homicide: The Movie," which airs Feb. 13 on NBC, and "Mary and Rhoda" (no last names necessary), running Monday on ABC. "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" closed up shop almost 23 years ago and "Homicide: Life on the Street" was canceled by NBC in May. But the characters of both series have apparently been very busy carrying on their pretend lives somewhere in the ether, out of our view, all this time. And now they're back in our living rooms with tales of near-death miracles and being called to the light by Joe Friday and Lucy and Granny Clampett.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/07/mary_homicide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/07/mary_homicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An uncivil &#8220;Action&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/mill/1999/09/13/action</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox&#039;s raunchy, risky movie industry sitcom opens big -- and it just might have legs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>H</b>ollywood producers are not exactly America's sweethearts<br />
these days. To hear some politicians and cultural critics<br />
talk, our most successful purveyors of arsenal-showcasing<br />
action blockbusters are scum -- pure, <i>evil</i> scum.</p><p>So, say you're one of these Hollywood hotshots -- OK, say<br />
you're Joel Silver, the notoriously flamboyant producer of<br />
the "Die Hard" and "Lethal Weapon" movies. There are two<br />
ways you can deal with the people who blame you for every<br />
act of violence committed in America. You can start making<br />
nice family pictures, or you can say, "Fuck you." With<br />
"Action," the raunchy, hilarious new Fox sitcom Silver<br />
co-produced with Chris Thompson (<a href="/ent/tv/mill/1998/05/29mill.html">"The Larry Sanders Show,"</a> "The Naked Truth"), Silver says, "Fuck you" a lot. Actually,<br />
his cocky, abrasive alter ego, action flick producer Peter Dragon<br />
(a perfectly cast Jay Mohr), says it for him -- six times<br />
before the opening credits alone. The F-word is bleeped out,<br />
because this is broadcast TV (even if it's Fox). But you<br />
don't have to be a lip-reader to figure out the gist of<br />
Dragon's series-opening tirade, directed at a studio<br />
commissary worker who protests when Dragon steals his<br />
"employee of the month" parking space.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/action/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Sarah got her groove back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/sex_city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/sex_city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Kimmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and the City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/mill/1999/06/14/sex_city</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In HBO&#039;s voyeuristic treat "Sex and the City," Sarah Jessica Parker
finally gets a role fit for a comedy goddess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>arah Jessica Parker looks like a walking doodle, a daydreamy collision of curves and straight lines. The wavy mane and wiggly bod don't quite prepare you for the playful intelligence of her long face, though, or the warmth of her gaze. Parker still bears traces of the roles she played as a kid actress -- spunky Little Orphan Annie, awkward Patty Greene, her teenage nerd from the '80s cult sitcom "Square Pegs" -- and you don't expect to find those particular humanizing qualities in someone who looks so hot in Prada. The element of surprise is Parker's greatest asset as an actress, but in her biggest films ("L.A. Story," "The First Wives Club"), she's been predictably cast as a bimbo with marshmallow for brains.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/sex_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/sex_city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

