<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > slavery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/slavery_2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Slave descendants seek equal rights from Cherokee Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/slave_descendants_seek_equal_rights_from_cherokee_nation_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/slave_descendants_seek_equal_rights_from_cherokee_nation_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YMCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new lawsuit challenges the exclusion of African-descended Cherokees from tribal benefits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thislandpress.com/magazine/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/TLPlogo.png" alt="This Land" /></a> On an oppressively hot evening last May, David Cornsilk addressed a room of so-called “black Indians” at Gilcrease Hills Baptist Church in northwest Tulsa. He wore a leather-braided bolo tie clasped by an emerald quartz. Though Cornsilk never formally studied law, his voice bellowed with the rhetorical ire of a white-shoed seasoned litigator.</p><p>“By a show of hands, how many folks here tonight are Freedmen?” Cornsilk asked into the microphone. Each raised an arm. Visibly dismayed, Cornsilk shook his head. It was a trick question.</p><p>“No,” Cornsilk said. “The Freedmen died a long time ago. You are not Freedmen. You are Cherokee, and it is time that you begin to recognize who you are.”</p><p>Cornsilk is Cherokee, and a self-taught civil rights advocate and genealogist. He traces his slave-owning ancestors back to their aboriginal lands of Georgia and Tennessee — to a period before the Trail of Tears. Cornsilk is not a Cherokee Freedmen descendant. For nearly two decades, however, Cornsilk fought for the citizenship rights of Freedmen descendants — blacks who descend from slaves once owned by Cherokee and other tribes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/slave_descendants_seek_equal_rights_from_cherokee_nation_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/slave_descendants_seek_equal_rights_from_cherokee_nation_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for Democrats to ditch Andrew Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Hickory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trail of Tears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferson-Jackson dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Biden speaks at event named for Old Hickory tonight, more appalling stories show party should dump him as icon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spring means that appeals for money are bursting forth from both major political parties. It also means Democratic officials in states and counties around the country are busy getting people out to their major fundraiser, the Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner. And they’re bringing in the big guns: Vice President Joe Biden will keynote the South Carolina Democrats’ dinner <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/biden-cruz-to-headline-sc-events-2-miles-apart/">tonight</a>.</p><p>But<strong> </strong>after an election in which<strong> </strong>Democrats rode a wave of minority support to keep the White House and Senate, party activists should wonder about one of the founders for whom that event is named. If branding matters, then the tradition of honoring perhaps the most systematic violator of human rights for America’s nonwhites should finally run its course.</p><p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2013/04/TD-allman-finding-florida-greatest-hits">Renowned journalist</a> T.D. Allman’s gripping "Finding Florida: The True History of the Sunshine State" argues that brutality was a habit of mind for party icon Andrew Jackson long before he laid the groundwork, as president, for the Trail of Tears, the thousand-mile death march that killed 4,000 Cherokees in 1838−39.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/its_time_for_democrats_to_ditch_andrew_jackson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 things you may not know about death penalty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/5_things_you_may_not_know_about_death_penalty_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/5_things_you_may_not_know_about_death_penalty_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Maryland becoming the latest state to abolish its use, we look back on capital punishment's tortured history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> On March 15, 2013 Maryland became the sixth state in the U.S. to either abolish the death penalty or to impose a moratorium upon its use, joining Illinois (2001), New York (2007), New Jersey (2007), New Mexico (2009), and Connecticut (2012). Bills to abolish the death penalty have either been introduced or will be introduced this year in a number of states, including Alabama, California, Florida, Colorado, and others.</p><p>The tide is clearly turning against state-sanctioned killing in the name of the law. What many Americans do not know is that debates about the death penalty are as old as the nation itself. What follows are five facts that every American should know about capital punishment and its history in the U.S.</p><p><strong>1. The history of capital punishment is the history of slavery's attempts to destroy free speech.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/5_things_you_may_not_know_about_death_penalty_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/5_things_you_may_not_know_about_death_penalty_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is gun control racist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/is_gun_control_racist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/is_gun_control_racist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new ad from a black conservative group sees echoes of Jim Crow in proposals to expand background checks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">If you’ve been paying attention to the hardline elements in the pro-gun crowd lately, you probably already know that gun control leads <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/stop_talking_about_hitler/">to genocide</a>, and <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/26/survivors-of-rape-speak-out-against-gun-control-i-was-denied-the-one-equalizing-factor-that-i-had/">rape</a> -- but is it also racist? That’s what some on the right say, including a group of black conservatives who recently released an ad comparing background checks to Jim Crow-era laws restricting African Americans’ rights to firearms.</p><p dir="ltr">“A call for background checks evokes painful memories of Jim Crow and black codes,” somber text in the ad reads between black and white images of Klan rallies and a lynching. “Never again,” the controversial ad concludes, borrowing the term from Holocaust survivors.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uMV1hNXt1JM" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe><br /> The campaign, organized by Star Parker and her Center for Urban Renewal and Education (CURE) is clearly meant to be provocative, and Parker helped crank up the controversy this week when she told Sean Hannity that women who have had abortions may be prohibited from by buying guns because the procedure is <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/03/19/fox-guest-pushes-debunked-link-between-abortion/193139">linked (erroneously) with mental illness</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/is_gun_control_racist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/is_gun_control_racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuccinelli compares slavery abolition to anti-abortion movement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/cuccinelli_compares_slavery_abolition_to_anti_abortion_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/cuccinelli_compares_slavery_abolition_to_anti_abortion_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican Attorney General said of both, "history has shown us what the right position was"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<article>RICHMOND, Va. — Virginia Democrats pushed two deeply emotional hot buttons Tuesday in the state’s gubernatorial race, slamming Republican Ken Cuccinelli for equating the nation’s bloody reckoning over slavery with today’s anti-abortion movement.Nearly eight months before election day the Democratic Party of Virginia released video from last June that shows Cuccinelli addressing a small gathering of religious conservatives meeting in Williamsburg. It continues the Democrats’ strategy of portraying the socially conservative attorney general as too extreme for a swing state.“Over time, the truth demonstrates its own rightness, and its own righteousness. Our experience as a country has demonstrated that on one issue after another. Start right at the beginning — slavery. Today, abortion,” Cuccinelli said in remarks recorded by a Democratic Party tracker at a Family Foundation event on June 14, 2012.</p> <p>“History has shown us what the right position was, and those were issues that were attacked by people of faith aggressively to change the course of this country,” he said. “We need to fight for the respect for life, not just for life but for respect for life. One leads to the other.”</p> <p>Blending the explosive emotional issues of abortion and slavery signaled a race quickly gaining heat as the only competitive gubernatorial campaign in America, showcasing stark partisan and ideological divides in a state that has been won twice by Democratic President Barack Obama, yet has a Republican governor and GOP-ruled Legislature.</p> <p>Cuccinelli spokeswoman Anna Nix called the DPV video an effort by the presumptive Democratic gubernatorial nominee, former Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, to shift the focus of the race away from job creation toward divisive issues. Neither McAuliffe nor Cuccinelli faces a challenger for the nomination.</p> <p>“Instead, McAuliffe wants to take his experience as DNC Chairman and run a contentious campaign that divides Virginia. As attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli fights to protect the innocent. From victims of human trafficking and child pornography to those wrongly convicted of a crime, Ken will continue to speak for the weakest in our society,” Nix said.</p> <p>Democrats contended that equating the struggle over institutionalized human bondage that led to the Civil War with abortion rights is improper in any context.</p> <p>“By equating a woman’s constitutional right to make her own health care decisions with slavery, Ken Cuccinelli proved yet again that he is too extreme for Virginia,” said Lauren Harmon, executive director of the Democratic Party of Virginia.</p> <p>Suggesting any moral equivalency between the abolition of slavery and the dispute over abortion is historically ignorant at best and outrageous at worst, said L. Douglas Wilder, a Virginia grandson of slaves and the nation’s first elected black governor.</p> <p>“I would think that if Mr. Cuccinelli had a chance to reflect, he would refine his statements,” the Democratic former governor said Tuesday in an Associated Press telephone interview.</p> <p>“It’s hurtful to me, but it’s a reminder that it’s ignorance. And this isn’t just relegated to white people. Any number of persons of African descent have no idea about slavery and its effects,” Wilder said.</p> </article><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/cuccinelli_compares_slavery_abolition_to_anti_abortion_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/cuccinelli_compares_slavery_abolition_to_anti_abortion_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC panel on racism goes awry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K Carl Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[UPDATED] The panel was intended to teach Tea Partyers how to fight back against charges that they are racist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A panel hosted by the Tea Party Patriots, intended to teach CPAC attendees how to fight back against charges that they are racist, devolved quickly into the crowd shouting down a liberal black woman who repeatedly tried to ask questions.</p><p>The panel was run by K. Carl Smith, of the Frederick Douglass Republicans, who mostly advised the predominantly white audience that if they're "sick and tired of being called a racist and a sellout" they should join the Frederick Douglass Republicans. You "can't play the race card on him, you can't play the class warfare card on him," Smith said of Douglass.</p><p>"Race-baiting comes off the table" when you say you are a Frederick Douglass Republican, he said, noting that there are both black and white members of the group. "How are you going to call a Frederick Douglass Republican racist?"</p><p>One audience member, Scott Terry, a self-professed white Southerner,  asked why members of "my demographic are systematically disenfranchised," and why it's "anathema" to be proud of Southern heritage. When Smith told him that Douglass forgave his slavemaster, Terry replied: “For giving him shelter? And food?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/cpac_panel_on_racism_goes_awry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York school assigns racist word-problems to fourth-graders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/new_york_school_assigns_racist_word_problems_to_fourth_graders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/new_york_school_assigns_racist_word_problems_to_fourth_graders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fourth-grade teacher hands out math problems using dead slaves as units of measurement  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today in advice we didn't think would ever require repeating: Teachers, it is never a good idea to use dead slaves as units of measurement in your math problems.</p><p>On Thursday, NY1 revealed the story of a New York public school that has been doling out some incredibly unorthodox homework. When a fourth-grade teacher asked student teacher Aziza Harding to make copies of the worksheets, Harding was stunned to see that it was a "Slavery Word Problems Homework" assignment. The word problems included the questions, "In a slave ship, there can be 3,799 slaves. One day, the slaves took over the ship. 1,897 are dead. How many slaves are alive?" and, "One slave got whipped five times a day. How many times did he get whipped in a month (31 days)? Another slave got whipped nine times a day. How many times did he get whipped in a month? How many times did the two slaves get whipped together in one month?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/new_york_school_assigns_racist_word_problems_to_fourth_graders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/new_york_school_assigns_racist_word_problems_to_fourth_graders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, BuzzFeed, no one seriously compared anything to slavery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/no_buzzfeed_no_one_seriously_compared_anything_to_slavery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/no_buzzfeed_no_one_seriously_compared_anything_to_slavery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Markey brought the case up, but he's not the one constantly "equating" stuff with Dred Scott]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nine times out of 10, when you see a headline use the format "[Political figure] compares [current issue] to [uniquely tragic or horrific historical event or figure]" you are about to read some idiotic trumped-up outrage fuel. The Internet is powered by trumped-up outrage fuel, and "dumbass says this is just like what the Nazis did" is can't-miss click bait. <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/johnstanton/ed-markey-compares-campaign-finance-ruling-to-decision-uphol">So here's BuzzFeed's John Stanton with "Ed Markey Compares Campaign Finance Ruling to Decision Upholding Slavery." </a></p><p>In traditional BuzzFeed fashion, the story is big shareable SHOCK headline in the front, boring and largely unread context that defuses most of the outrage in the back. (I think this common style of controversy-stoking story packaging is "TRASHY" and "EW.")</p><p>Here's the relevant bit:</p><blockquote><p>"I want to go to the United States Senate in order to fight for a constitutional amendment to repeal Citizens United. The whole idea that the Koch brothers, that Karl Rove can say we're coming to Massachusetts, to any state of the union with undisclosed amounts of money is a pollution, which must be changed," Markey said to loud applause.</p> <p>"The constitution must be amended. The Dred Scott decision had to be repealed, we have to repeal Citizens United," he added.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/no_buzzfeed_no_one_seriously_compared_anything_to_slavery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/no_buzzfeed_no_one_seriously_compared_anything_to_slavery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi &#8220;officially&#8221; bans slavery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/mississippi_finally_officially_banned_slavery_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/mississippi_finally_officially_banned_slavery_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state finally ratified the Thirteenth Amendment but modern-day slavery is still thriving ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>In a major step forward, Mississippi banned slavery this week. This type of definite legislative action is ostensibly the type of thing to be excited about in an era of unprecedented political foot-dragging, so congratulations Mississippi for finally ratifying the Thirteenth Amendment. Sure, the state is a little behind the curve on this one, given that the nation is a full 148 years past the official end of slavery (more on that, in a second). But Mississippi isn’t the only state that took awhile to warm up to the idea that people shouldn't own, sell, beat and rape other people in a nation that is largely (and perhaps falsely) recognized as one of the most civilized in the world.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/mississippi_finally_officially_banned_slavery_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/mississippi_finally_officially_banned_slavery_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Mississippi ratifies the 13th Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/must_see_morning_clip_mississippi_ratifies_the_13th_amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/must_see_morning_clip_mississippi_ratifies_the_13th_amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abolition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart mocks Mississippi for finally catching up to the 19th century]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost 150 years after the abolition of slavery, Mississippi has finally ratified the 13th Amendment, inspired by Steven Spielberg's film, "Lincoln" "And then," Jon Stewart jokes, "Mississippi went to see 'Django Unchained' and tried to take their ratification back":</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:423987" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-february-20-2013/the-last-amender">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.indecisionforever.com/'>Political Humor & Satire Blog</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/must_see_morning_clip_mississippi_ratifies_the_13th_amendment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/must_see_morning_clip_mississippi_ratifies_the_13th_amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration, yes. Indentured serfdom, no</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/immigration_yes_indentured_serfdom_no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/immigration_yes_indentured_serfdom_no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slave Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serfdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cesar Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13184988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dark side of immigration reform: A new "guest worker program" that's as close as we may get to modern slavery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/28/politics/immigration-reform/index.html">outlines</a> of a bipartisan plan for immigration reform have been <a href="http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/bipartisan-framework-for-immigration-reform-report/27/">announced</a> by a group of senators. While most of its provisions are reasonable -- a path to citizenship for most illegal immigrants, increased skilled immigration and increased law enforcement -- one provision stinks to high heaven and should be rejected by Americans of left, right and center. That provision is a massive, special-interest-driven expansion of indentured servitude in the United States, in the form of a new “guest-worker program.” (President Obama, while hailing the plan in general on Tuesday, has not weighed in on the specifics of the guest-worker program.)</p><p>Indentured servitude or contract labor, like slavery, is a form of unfree labor. Unfortunately, the U.S., having abolished slavery, still has pockets of indentured servant labor. Whether relatively well-paid, like many highly educated H-1B workers, or poorly paid, like many H-2A agricultural workers, indentured servants are, in effect, indentured serfs. Because their presence in the U.S. is dependent on their employment by a particular employer, they cannot quit and are motivated to appease their employer, no matter how brutally they are exploited. If they protest maltreatment, they can be fired and forced to return to their home countries.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/immigration_yes_indentured_serfdom_no/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/immigration_yes_indentured_serfdom_no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP sensitivity training takes place in room named for plantation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_sensitivity_training_takes_place_in_room_named_for_slave_owners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_sensitivity_training_takes_place_in_room_named_for_slave_owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House GOP is learning about “successful communication with minorities and women" in a very unusual setting ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Burwells were among the "First Families" in the Colony of Virginia. They also happened to own several plantations -- <a href="http://research.history.org/Historical_Research/Research_Themes/ThemeEnslave/Burwells.cfm" target="_blank">and slaves</a>.</p><p>So naturally the GOP would host lawmakers eager to learn about "successful communication with minorities and women" in a room named for those plantations.</p><p>Naturally.</p><p>[embedtweet id="291965501293346816"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_sensitivity_training_takes_place_in_room_named_for_slave_owners/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_sensitivity_training_takes_place_in_room_named_for_slave_owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just how factual is &#8220;Lincoln&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/just_how_factual_is_lincoln/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/just_how_factual_is_lincoln/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doris Kearns Goodwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Foner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Kushner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historians question whether Spielberg has made the 16th president into an unrealistic hero]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/fact_checking_zero_dark_thirtys_almost_journalism/">The debate over the facts in "Zero Dark Thirty"</a> rages on, as the sources behind Kathryn Bigelow's self-proclaimed work of cinematic journalism remain obscure. Fortunately for Steven Spielberg, his film has not been the target of media scrutiny. But while "Lincoln" arguably leads the field for the best picture Academy Award and is a huge financial hit, there are historians who believe the film paints a simplistic view of the Great Emancipator and the process of passing the 13th Amendment.</p><p>"It coheres, in some ways, very well, and, in some ways, not so well," says Bruce Levine, a historian from the University of Illinois who just published the well-received Civil War history <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400067030/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Fall of the House of Dixie."</a> "I give them a mixed review."</p><p>The film's focus on a narrow period of history — from after the 1864 election to Abraham Lincoln's assassination — necessarily overemphasizes Lincoln's role in ending an institution that was nearing its death, said Levine. "There are fundamental gaps in 'Lincoln.' Watching the film, you don't know that by the time of the events described, slavery is already badly undermined — slaves have been running away from their masters in border states and Confederate states even before fighting began."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/just_how_factual_is_lincoln/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/just_how_factual_is_lincoln/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the new Civil War</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/welcome_to_the_new_civil_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/welcome_to_the_new_civil_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13162616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lincoln's unfinished war rages on, as the neo-Confederacy tries to turn back the clock on women, gays, God and guns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a repeat viewing of Steven Spielberg’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/lincoln/">“Lincoln”</a> over the New Year’s holiday, a scene I had barely noticed the first time jumped out at me. Confederate vice-president <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_H._Stephens">Alexander Stephens</a> (played with reptilian gentility by Jackie Earle Haley), in a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampton_Roads_Conference">secret meeting</a> aboard a steamboat with Abraham Lincoln and Secretary of State William Seward, faces up to the reality that the era of slavery has come to an end. Ratification of the 13th Amendment, Stephens muses, will destroy the basis of the Southern economy and the South’s traditional way of life. “We won’t know ourselves anymore,” he says.</p><p>If only it had been so. What an affluent slaveowner like Stephens feared most, no doubt, was the utopian vision of “radical Reconstruction” imagined by legendary abolitionist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thaddeus_Stevens">Thaddeus Stevens</a> (Tommy Lee Jones in the movie), in an earlier conversation with Lincoln in the White House kitchen. Stevens envisioned a future in which all the land and property of the Southern aristocracy would be dispossessed and divided among the emancipated slaves, building a new society of free soil and free labor amid the ruins of tyranny. To put it in contemporary social-studies terms, Stevens hoped that by uprooting and destroying the South’s slave economy, one could also replace its culture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/welcome_to_the_new_civil_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/welcome_to_the_new_civil_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>203</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino is the baddest black filmmaker working today</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samuel jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulp fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Awards Season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Django Unchained" is the perfect revenge fantasy for black people -- except that it was made by a white man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some folks who won’t like to read these words: White guy superstar director Quentin Tarantino may be the baddest black filmmaker working in big-time Hollywood movies today.</p><p>That is a possibility which angers some, frightens others and disgusts a few more, saying as much or more about the sorry state of movie audiences today and the still-closed world of big-time filmmaking than any tart provocation Tarantino has managed to splash on the screen.</p><p>The reason we’re having this conversation — again — is thanks to the latest addictive confection of revenge film, spaghetti Western, Blaxploitation movie and anti-slavery fantasy Q.T. dropped on us all to close out 2012: <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/">"Django Unchained."</a></p><p>Beyond the fact that it is gleefully bloody, luxuriating in crimson-splattered shootouts at a time when America is deeply conflicted over how much it loves this stuff, "Django Unchained" uncorks the perfect revenge fantasy for black people descended from slaves and living in a still-white-dominated society.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spike Lee: &#8220;Django Unchained&#8221; is &#8220;disrespectful to my ancestors&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/spike_lee_says_django_unchained_is_disrespectful_to_my_ancestors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/spike_lee_says_django_unchained_is_disrespectful_to_my_ancestors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spike Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famous film director refuses to see Tarantino's latest movie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, director Spike Lee told VibeTV that he refuses to see Quentin Tarantino's "Django Unchained," the violent slavery-era Western that came out on Tuesday. "I cant speak on it 'cause I'm not gonna see it," he said. "All I'm going to say is that it's disrespectfu<wbr>l to my ancestors. That's just me...I'm not speaking on behalf of anybody else." Lee also <a href="https://twitter.com/SpikeLee/statuses/282611091777941504?tw_i=282611091777941504&amp;tw_e=details&amp;tw_p=tweetembed">tweeted</a>: "American Slavery Was Not A Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western. It Was A Holocaust. My Ancestors Are Slaves. Stolen From Africa. I Will Honor Them.”</wbr></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/spike_lee_says_django_unchained_is_disrespectful_to_my_ancestors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/spike_lee_says_django_unchained_is_disrespectful_to_my_ancestors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino&#8217;s incoherent three-hour bloodbath</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samuel l jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo DiCaprio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Django Unchained" has action, comedy, fake history and oceans of blood -- but it's an endless, undisciplined mess]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/quentin_tarantino">Quentin Tarantino</a> no longer makes movies; he makes trailers. <a href="http://unchainedmovie.com/">“Django Unchained”</a> feels like a three-hour trailer for a movie that never happens, a slavery-revenge melodrama cum salt-‘n’-pepper action film that would be awesome if it actually existed. Like so many trailers, it’s packed with memorable scenes that don’t go anywhere, and keeps promising payoffs that remain theoretical. It’s got Western scenery on a grand scale and scenes of madcap comedy involving inept members of the Ku Klux Klan. It’s got veritable geysers and fountains and gushers of blood, an ocean of fake gore even by Tarantino’s standards. You could claim that he’s “quoting from Sam Peckinpah” with those slapsticky water balloons full of blood, except that that’s not quite it. It’s more like he’s quoting from crappy ‘70s drive-in movies that were quoting from “The Hills Have Eyes,” which was quoting from something else that was quoting from Peckinpah. (I may be missing an intermediate stage there, such as a cannibal film that was dubbed from Italian into Spanish and projected once, with the reels out of sequence, at a downtown Los Angeles theater in 1983.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How should we talk about blackface?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/how_should_we_talk_about_blackface/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/how_should_we_talk_about_blackface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spike Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book tries -- and often fails -- to untangle its complicated legacy in American popular culture]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHEN RIDING THE BUS to the University of Texas campus a few years back, I became suddenly conscious of the fact that the cover of the book in my hands depicted a stark white fist clutching a hammer against a black background. And the title: <em>The Wages of Whiteness</em>. It was enough to raise a few eyebrows. At the time, I was delving through the available literature on blackface minstrelsy, as part of my exams for the Ph.D. program in American Studies. Looking back on this brief bit of extreme self-consciousness, I think my gut feeling was right, because — at best — the topic of minstrelsy in America is a discomfiting one, not typically broached in public.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/how_should_we_talk_about_blackface/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/how_should_we_talk_about_blackface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons for Obama, from Abe Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/lessons_for_obama_from_abe_lincoln/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/lessons_for_obama_from_abe_lincoln/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13061316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Spielberg's "Lincoln," a vilified president outfoxes his hateful opponents in a bitterly divided America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abraham Lincoln remains until further notice the standard by which all presidents are judged, and by which all invariably fall short. The task that confronts presidents and turns them prematurely gray – look at pictures of Barack Obama in 2008 and today, or George W. Bush in 2001 and 2008 – has two levels that are often in conflict. He (one day soon we may get to add “she”) must fight the political battles of the day, with all the compromise, arm-twisting, prevarication and skulduggery that implies, while still holding in mind larger and more abstract questions about the role of the United States in the world, the moral imperatives of history, the will of God.</p><p>Neither Obama nor Mitt Romney is foolish enough to compare himself directly to Lincoln, but whichever man is elected on Tuesday faces a political landscape nearly as divided and poisonous as the one confronted by the 16th president. Moreover, this year’s election will vividly illustrate that the schisms of the Civil War – over differing visions of justice and equality, competing ideas about states’ rights and federal power, cultural divisions between North and South – have yet to heal, long after the passage of many generations and enormous waves of demographic change ought to have rendered them irrelevant. I have no doubt about which candidate Steven Spielberg and Tony Kushner believe comes closer to the Lincolnian ideal, but their remarkable film <a href="http://www.thelincolnmovie.com/">“Lincoln”</a> offers urgent lessons to both candidates, and the rest of us, about how to wield political power in times of crisis. Whether those lessons still pertain in the dysfunctional climate of the 21st century is another matter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/lessons_for_obama_from_abe_lincoln/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/lessons_for_obama_from_abe_lincoln/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Master of the Mountain&#8221;: The real truth about Thomas Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founding Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13039141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Sally Hemings -- a historian discovers the ugliest side of a founding father in his ledgers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No founding father wrote more eloquently on behalf of liberty and human rights than Thomas Jefferson, and none has a more troubling record when it comes to the "peculiar institution" of slavery. At present, the popular understanding of Jefferson's shilly-shallying on this issue doesn't extend much deeper than knowing smirks about Sally Hemings and the (unacknowledged) children Jefferson fathered with her. We tend to assume that the dirtiest secrets of the past have to do with sex. But, as Henry Wiencek explains in his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0374299560/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Master of the Mountain: Thomas Jefferson and His Slaves,"</a> the real filth is in the ledger books.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
