<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/social_media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter vs. the New York Times: Who wins?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Thiel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Megabucks libertarian Peter Thiel touts the social media network. But don't count newspapers out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A CNN headline Tuesday morning: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/01/investing/twitter-thiel-andreessen/index.html">"Peter Thiel: Twitter will outlast the New York Times.</a>" Peter Thiel co-founded PayPal, was an early crucial investor in Facebook and is not only a very rich man, but a <a href="http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=1187">pretty smart guy.</a> Presumably, therefore, we should pay attention to what he says.</p><p>What he actually said, in a debate with Mark Andreessen at the Milken Institute Global Conference, according to CNN, was that "Twitter's roughly 1,000 employees will have jobs a decade from now," because "the business case for Twitter is solid," while employees of the New York Times "should be worried about the longevity of their jobs" because the newspaper "is not guaranteed a future in the digital age."</p><p>Please. No one is <em>guaranteed</em> a future in the digital age. But if I had to pick one paper that had the best chance of surviving and thriving, I'd probably choose the New York Times, a newspaper that continues to provide indispensable, in-depth reporting on topics of great social importance. And if I had to pick one social media network that was most likely to survive, I'd pick ... well, who the hell knows? Social media networks, so far, have the lifespan of butterflies. They look nice for a few minutes, and then they're gone. Poof! Friendster, MySpace, et cetera.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: Twitter Music</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music discovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media and music discovery never looked so good. But be careful who you follow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Last night I broke the seal on a Jim Beam decanter that looks like Elvis..."</p><p>I started writing my review of Twitter Music while listening to a George Jones country song I'd never heard before: "The King Is Gone (and so are you.)" I listened to a lot of George Jones on the day I learned he died. It seemed appropriate, if a bit macabre, to follow him on Twitter Music and see what sort of songs might pop up as a result.</p><p>I'm not going to list "The King Is Gone" in my top ten George Jones pantheon (frankly, any chorus with the words "yabba dabba doo" is <em>right out</em>) but I'm glad I heard it. I love being exposed to new music (even if, and sometimes especially if, it's old music).</p><p>Twitter Music is all about the social discovery of new music. It suggests for your listening pleasure songs that are already popular on Twitter, songs that the people you follow are tweeting about and listening to, and songs from artists who are in mysterious ways connected to the musicians that you choose to follow. It's confusing in a good, serendipitous, jumbled up kind of way. You're never quite sure how exactly the algorithm works that is generating the tunes, but that's OK. The whole point is <em>discovery,</em> hearing something new that you might like, generated through a fortuitous crunching of your social relationships. If you have a Spotify or Rdio premium account you can listen to the entirety of the songs; if you have iTunes you get a 30-second clip and the option to buy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP official&#8217;s Facebook status: She&#8217;s &#8220;hot enough to almost make me register Democrat&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New Mexico official gets suspended for sexist social media activity -- during a meeting. It's just the beginning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His <a href="https://www.facebook.com/kush.steve">Facebook friends</a> call him "an honorable man" who was just "being funny." They say that "People are way to [sic] sensitive in this day and age." But when Steve Kush, the executive director of Bernalillo County's (New Mexico) Republican Party, went on a social media rampage during a local commissioners' meeting about the minimum wage earlier this week, his party chairman, Frank Ruvelo, saw things differently.</p><p>Seems his fellow Republicans did not appreciate what Kush said on Twitter and Facebook regarding a 19-year-old female at the meeting, "Nice hat Working America chick but damn you are a radical bitch." Nor did it enjoy his remarks depicting the organization's state director Chelsey Evans as "Uh oh another Working America chick," or his observation that she had "nice boots…I know she makes more than min wage." And they definitely didn't find it too amusing when he declared that she "was hot enough to almost make me register democrat."</p><p>He's currently suspended, indefinitely, without pay.</p><p><a href="http://newmexico.watchdog.org/17738/i-absolutely-crossed-the-line-bernallio-county-gop-exec-suspended-for-facebook-comments/">"It was an ill-fated attempt at humor,</a>" Kush told Watchdog.org Wednesday. "Do I regret it? Yes … I absolutely crossed the line."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Boston exposes America&#8217;s dark post-9/11 bargain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/how_boston_exposes_americas_dark_post_911_bargain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/how_boston_exposes_americas_dark_post_911_bargain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manhunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did this story drive the whole country nuts? Because we traded rights for "security," and didn't get either]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put it mildly, this has been a bad week for democracy and a worse one for public discourse. In the minutes and hours after the bombs went off in Boston last Monday, marathon runners, first responders and many ordinary citizens responded to a chaotic situation with great courage and generosity, not knowing whether they might be putting their own lives at risk. Since then, though, it’s mostly been a massive and disheartening national freakout, with pundits, politicians, major news outlets and the self-appointed sleuths of the Internet – in fact, nearly everyone besides those directly affected by the attack – heaping disgrace upon themselves.</p><p>We’ve seen the most famous TV network in the news business repeatedly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/cnns_boston_embarrassment_how_a_scoop_turns_sour/">botch basic facts,</a> while one of the country’s largest-circulation newspapers misreported the number of people killed, launched a wave of hysteria over a “Saudi national” who turned out to have nothing to do with the crime, and then <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/new_york_post_fingers_two_boston_bag_men/">published a cover photo</a> suggesting that two other guys (also innocent) might be the bombers. We’ve seen the vaunted crowd-sourcing capability of Reddit degenerate into <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_internets_shameful_false_id/">self-reinforcing mass delusion,</a> in which a bunch of people whose law-enforcement expertise consisted of massive doses of “CSI” convinced themselves that a missing college student was one of the bombing suspects. (He wasn’t – and with that young man’s fate still unknown, how does his family feel today?)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/how_boston_exposes_americas_dark_post_911_bargain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/how_boston_exposes_americas_dark_post_911_bargain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>241</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A nation of police scanner rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police scanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement and social media were uncomfortable bedfellows in Boston this week. Teachable moment?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long after the enormity of what had happened at the finish line of the Boston Marathon began to sink in to the culture at large on Monday afternoon, someone I follow on Twitter posted a link to a live feed of Boston's police scanner. I immediately started listening. I wasn't alone. When I signed on there were 5,000 other listeners; a few minutes later, 10,000, then 20,000.</p><p>And then I turned it off. The staccato bursts of information were too chaotic, too jumbled, too contradictory for me to make much sense of. I needed more filtered news. Sure, it's way cool and still kind of mind-blowing that I can sit at my desk in Berkeley, Calif., and listen to police officers in Boston warn each other about suspicious packages that might contain explosive devices, but it wasn't helping me understand what was happening.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombing suspects reportedly had big social media presence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/bombing_suspects_reportedly_had_big_social_media_presence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/bombing_suspects_reportedly_had_big_social_media_presence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One brother reportedly posted videos on YouTube, and the other used Russia's biggest social media platform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more details emerge about the two suspects in the Boston bombing case, one now deceased, reports are also surfacing about their presence on social media.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/us/boston-marathon-bombings.html?pagewanted=2">New York Times</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Both brothers have substantial presence on social media. On Vkontakte, Russia’s most popular social media platform, the younger brother, Dzhokhar, describes his worldview as “Islam” and, asked to identify “the main thing in life,” answers “career and money.” He lists a series of affinity groups relating to Chechnya, and lists a verse from the Koran, “Do good, because Allah loves those who do good.”</p> <p>The older brother left a record on YouTube of his favorite clips, which included Russian rap videos, as well as testimonial from a young ethnic Russian man titled “How I accepted Islam and became a Shiite,” a clip titled “Seven Steps to Successful Prayer.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/bombing_suspects_reportedly_had_big_social_media_presence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/bombing_suspects_reportedly_had_big_social_media_presence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter co-founder&#8217;s parents fight to get verified Twitter accounts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/twitter_co_founders_parents_fight_to_get_verified_twitter_accounts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/twitter_co_founders_parents_fight_to_get_verified_twitter_accounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack dorsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st. louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mayor of St. Louis has joined their cause]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/must_see_morning_clip_twitter_founder_jack_dorsey_tweets_at_his_mom_daily/">tweets at his mom daily</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/marciadorsey">Marcia Dorsey</a> can't seem to get a verified Twitter account. And neither can dad <a href="https://twitter.com/Tim535353">Tim Dorsey</a>.</p><p>Case in point:</p><p>[embedtweet id="321427245522616320"]</p><p>The two have <a href="http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2013/04/jack_dorsey_parents_verified_twitter.php">launched an informal campaign</a> to get verified on their son's site, reports <a href="http://betabeat.com/2013/04/dont-worry-guys-jack-dorseys-parents-arent-verified-either/">BetaBeat</a>.</p><p>Even the Mayor of St. Louis (who has a verified account), where the Dorseys live, has joined the cause:</p><p>[embedtweet id="321439687522787329"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="321441006975320064"]</p><p>Verification on Twitter is designated by a blue and white check mark next to a user's name, and "is currently used to establish authenticity of identities on Twitter", according to the <a href="https://support.twitter.com/articles/119135-faqs-about-verified-accounts">Twitter FAQs</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/twitter_co_founders_parents_fight_to_get_verified_twitter_accounts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/twitter_co_founders_parents_fight_to_get_verified_twitter_accounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Stephen Colbert gets Bill Clinton on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/must_see_morning_clip_stephen_colbert_gets_bill_clinton_on_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/must_see_morning_clip_stephen_colbert_gets_bill_clinton_on_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former president avoids tweeting because "I'm insecure."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I'm insecure. What if you tweet, and nobody tweets back?" asked former president Bill Clinton on a special episode of "The Colbert Report" last night. "There's nothing worse than a friendless tweeter wandering around in cyberspace."</p><p>Colbert then created a Twitter account for Clinton with the handle PrezBillyJeff, and the two constructed his first tweet:</p><p>[embedtweet id="320644561439436800"]</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:colbertnation.com:425231" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/425231/april-08-2013/colbert-galactic-initiative---bill-clinton-pt--3">The Colbert Report</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/">Colbert Report Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision">Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/video">Video Archive</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/must_see_morning_clip_stephen_colbert_gets_bill_clinton_on_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/must_see_morning_clip_stephen_colbert_gets_bill_clinton_on_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why would anyone want a Facebook phone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/who_would_anyone_want_a_facebook_phone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/who_would_anyone_want_a_facebook_phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only one answer makes sense: The price will be right. Free smartphones for everyone!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's assume that all the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/03/29/facebook-preparing-more-visible-embrace-of-android/">rumors are true,</a> and Facebook is set to reveal -- as early as this Thursday -- its long-awaited <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/28/facebook-android-phone/">"Facebook Phone."</a> This will be a mobile device whose <a href="http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/04/01/apk-teardown-exclusive-the-htc-myst-facebook-phone-the-facebook-app-is-now-a-launcher-looks-like-theyre-planning-a-play-store-release-too/">home screen belongs to Facebook.</a> Turn it on, and you'll be able to text, take pictures, check your news feed, update your status and perhaps even make free phone calls, all within the confines of an integrated Facebook user interface. No time-consuming extra clicks necessary to launch the Facebook app -- your phone will <em>be</em> the Facebook app.</p><p>There's no mystery as to <em>why</em> Facebook would want to launch a Facebook phone. Facebook claims around 650 million mobile users and Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly totally focused on adapting Facebook to the mobile environment. The more Facebook can dominate your mobile experience, the more revenue-generating ads it can deliver to you. The future of Facebook is inextricably enmeshed with the future of the smartphone, so why wouldn't the company want to have one of its own?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/who_would_anyone_want_a_facebook_phone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/who_would_anyone_want_a_facebook_phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In support of Facebook&#8217;s sea of red for equality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/in_support_of_facebooks_sea_of_red_for_equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/in_support_of_facebooks_sea_of_red_for_equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cynics are wrong. Changing your profile picture really is a meaningful act aimed at those you love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rainbow has gone in a decidedly more monochromatic direction. If you've been on Facebook this week -- and you're not on the staff of the National Review -- chances are you've already noticed. As the black-robed Supreme Court weighs two cases involving marriage equality, users have been swapping out their usual smiling-during-a-sunset profile pictures with the Human Rights Campaign's scarlet and pink-hued equal sign logo.</p><p>The stampede began, as anything Facebook-related does, with George Takei. The actor and social media icon posted the HRC logo earlier this week, with a note explaining that, "For those friends wondering, this special 'red' equality symbol signifies that marriage equality really is all about love. Thanks to the Human Rights Campaign for this effort. Please consider changing your profile today in support -- esp if you are a straight ally."</p><p>And what Mr. Sulu says, goes. Throughout Tuesday, Takei also posted a few comical variations on the avatar theme, including my inevitable favorite, the one featuring Grumpy Cat. By the end of the day Facebook had all but turned red, with plain equal signs, glittery equal signs and ones tweaked to feature such legendary couples as Bert and Ernie and Peppermint Patty and Marcie. The always enthusiastic drinking community even got in on the act, with both <a href="http://www.adweek.com/adfreak/smirnoff-and-absolut-show-their-support-gay-marriage-facebook-148171">Smirnoff and Absolut updating their FB avatars</a> to reflect their own twists on equality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/in_support_of_facebooks_sea_of_red_for_equality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/in_support_of_facebooks_sea_of_red_for_equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is this alien smiling?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/what_does_the_future_hold_for_reddit_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/what_does_the_future_hold_for_reddit_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexis ohanian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erik martin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a shaky 2012, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian's goal remains the same: Give users ultimate control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reddit's best year ever might also have been its worst.</p><p>The massive online community whiplashed between public-relations extremes in 2012, from a presidential visit to a series of high-profile controversies that culminated with the outing and shaming of one its most notorious users. The social news site became an Internet behemoth, leading and beating the news, and directing jaw-dropping traffic to any site lucky enough to get a link on its front page. By the end of 2012, about 50 million people were visiting the site every month.</p><p><a href="http://www.dailydot.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/dailydot_square-e1362890536903.png" alt="The Daily Dot" /></a> For every admirable deed, redditors had an equal or greater negative action. They helped raise nearly a million dollars to support a bullied bus monitor in upstate New York, even as others were gleefully sharing sexually suggestive photos of women taken without their permission.</p><p>What has Reddit learned from the highs and lows of the past year? According to cofounder Alexis Ohanian and general manager Erik Martin, in the realm of Reddit, the best way to keep moving forward is to keep your hands off the steering wheel.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/what_does_the_future_hold_for_reddit_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/what_does_the_future_hold_for_reddit_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The tweet hereafter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/the_tweet_hereafter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/the_tweet_hereafter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13216081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new program wants to mimic your social media presence to help you tweet from beyond the grave ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ours is a generation obsessed with sharing every thought, feeling and brunch picture on social media. And now we never have to stop. Not even when we're dead.</p><p>The London-based ad team at Lean Mean Fighting Machine has introduced an "artificial intelligence experiment" called <a href="http://liveson.org/" target="_blank">LivesOn</a>. A program that will let Twitter users, <em>well</em>, live on through their account.</p><p>In order to distill information about your tastes, interests and "voice," the program analyzes your tweets while you're still alive. But once LivesOn learns enough about your social media style, it will begin posting updates independently to your new feed. Your followers can "favorite" the tweets that they like, providing even more informational feedback to the Twitter bot, helping it sound even more like "you."</p><p>Then, after you have tweeted your last and taken off for that big Google Hangout in the sky, your account's "executor" will decide whether or not to keep it active. Really, the tag line says it all: "When your heart stops beating, you'll keep tweeting."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/the_tweet_hereafter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/the_tweet_hereafter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s unstoppable humor police: We&#8217;re all hate-watchers now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/twitters_unstoppable_humor_police_were_all_hate_watchers_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/twitters_unstoppable_humor_police_were_all_hate_watchers_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politically incorrect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is social media too tough on political incorrectness? Ask Seth MacFarlane]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put aside, for a second, whether Oscars host Seth MacFarlane's comedy routine Sunday night revealed him as a sexist boor or just really, really unfunny. (Or both!) A more interesting question might be whether Twitter has evolved into a button-pushing comic's worst nightmare. Funny or not, you <em>will</em> get called out on Twitter whenever you step over what <em>anybody</em> considers a politically incorrect line. That's what we call a tough crowd. Maybe too tough<em>. </em></p><p>A case in point: With the Twitter masses already on edge after several hours of jokes about eating disorders, domestic abuse and boobs, MacFarlane pissed off an entirely new swath of Oscar-watchers when he said, "Well, we have finally reached the point in the ceremony where either Javier Bardem, Penelope Cruz or Salma Hayek comes onstage and we have no idea what they're saying -- but we don't care because they're so attractive."</p><p>My primary objection to this joke was that it was lame. If you're going to play the meta-commentary game you need to do better than that. If I made my own personal list of most offensive MacFarlane Oscar moments, I'm not sure it would crack the top 10. But a cross-section of Hispanics I follow on Twitter immediately labeled the "joke" borderline racist, and an angry mob well-primed to seize upon further outrages speedily retweeted their comments. For the rest of the night, "Latina accent joke" joined the litany of MacFarlane's assaults against his audience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/twitters_unstoppable_humor_police_were_all_hate_watchers_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/twitters_unstoppable_humor_police_were_all_hate_watchers_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your doctor is complaining about you on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/your_doctor_is_complaining_about_you_on_facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/your_doctor_is_complaining_about_you_on_facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PopRX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doctors are still figuring out how to use social media. But there are some things we need to stop doing right away]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy Dunbar, an OB-GYN in St. Louis, recently vented about a patient of hers: "So I have a patient who has chosen to either no-show or be late (sometimes hours) for all of her prenatal visits, ultrasounds and NSTs. She is now 3 hours late for her induction. May I show up late to her delivery?"</p><p>It's true that we physicians don't like it when patients show up late. So had Dunbar uttered this among her colleagues, those comments would not have raised many eyebrows. But her words traveled a lot further than the doctor’s lounge. Dunbar, it turns out, made them on her Facebook page, leading to some <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/ob-gyn-enrages-posting-personal-patient-info-facebook-article-1.1257743">deep criticism</a> for her lack of respect, and even calls that she be fired.</p><p>A recent <a href="http://quantiamd.com/q-qcp/doctorspatientssocialmedia.pdf">survey</a> of over 4,000 physicians showed that 67 percent use social media in a professional capacity. Many write blogs or use Twitter to broadcast their insights and opinion to a wider audience. Others have posted videos on YouTube. They are leveraging the strengths of social media: a fast, free and open channel of communication that is easy to use. But as Dunbar’s gaffe shows, many doctors are still trying to figure social media out.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/your_doctor_is_complaining_about_you_on_facebook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/your_doctor_is_complaining_about_you_on_facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Instagram image suggests Palestinian child as IDF target</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/instagram_image_suggests_palestinian_child_as_idf_target/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/instagram_image_suggests_palestinian_child_as_idf_target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An image seeming to show a boy in cross hairs prompts outrage and disturbs the IDF's social media P.R. efforts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the recognizable soft-focus filter of an Instagram image, the back of what appears to be a young Palestinian boy's head is framed in the cross hairs of a rifle. The photo, posted to the popular social media site by Israeli Defense Force sniper Mor Ostrovski, has caused outrage internationally since it was first flagged by Electronic Intifada's Ali Abunimah. The Israeli army, according to <a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/02/2013219111111446160.html">Al Jazeera, is now investigating as it remains unclear where the photograph was taken.</a></p><p>Abunimah <a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/02/2013219111111446160.html">gives some background </a>on the image from Ostrovski's now-deleted Instagram account:</p><blockquote><p>The context – particularly the character of the buildings seen in the background of the image – strongly suggests the child could be Palestinian.</p> <p>There are no other images to suggest that the photographer actually fired at the person in the image in this case. The image is simply tasteless and dehumanizing. It embodies the idea that Palestinian children are targets.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/instagram_image_suggests_palestinian_child_as_idf_target/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/instagram_image_suggests_palestinian_child_as_idf_target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Girls&#8221; star Allison Williams says she will never date Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/girls_star_allison_williams_says_she_will_never_date_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/girls_star_allison_williams_says_she_will_never_date_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allison williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her cliché of choice: "It's not you, it's me"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Dear Twitter,</p><p>I have received numerous invitations to join you in a relationship, and I figured it was time to respond to your advances."</p><p>So begins "Girls" star Allison Williams' <a href="http://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity-lifestyle/celebrities/allison-williams-not-trending-now?click=list7">cringe-inducing (breakup? rejection?) letter</a> to Twitter, the social media outlet of choice for Lena Dunham. Williams continues:</p><blockquote><p>Before you jump to conclusions, it's not that I'm seeing somebody else. I barely talk to Facebook anymore (we only ever speak when I need to expedite the name game after meeting a new person), too many friends have been with Instagram or Tumblr, and LinkedIn can ask until he's blue in the face ... not my type.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/girls_star_allison_williams_says_she_will_never_date_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/girls_star_allison_williams_says_she_will_never_date_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Jon Stewart mocks Facebook envy and Vine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_facebook_envy_and_vine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_facebook_envy_and_vine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13192280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, technology has advanced society, but it can be creepy, too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart tackles robots who replace Chinese factory workers, Facebook envy and that new video version of a Tweet, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/vine_the_new_twitter_or_chatroulette/">Vine</a> a Twitter-embeddable 6-second clip that is basically just another vehicle for porn. Says Stewart, "6 seconds of porn? That's 4 more seconds than anyone would need!"</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:423552" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-february-5-2013/jon-stewart-uploads-his-stream-on-your-facebook">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_facebook_envy_and_vine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_facebook_envy_and_vine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In China, a victory for women&#8217;s rights and the power of social media</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/in_china_a_victory_for_womens_rights_and_the_power_of_social_media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/in_china_a_victory_for_womens_rights_and_the_power_of_social_media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13191836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a major victory, a Beijing court granted Kim Lee a divorce on the grounds of abuse and a protection order ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim Lee, an American woman who used social media to go public with accusations of domestic violence against her wealthy and famous husband, Li Yang, has just scored a major victory for women's rights and the rule of law in China.</p><p>As <a href="http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/04/in-chinas-most-watched-divorce-case-3-victories-1-defeat/" target="_blank">reported</a> by Didi Kirsten Tatlow at the New York Times, Lee made history this weekend after a Beijing court granted her divorce on the grounds of abuse and issued a three-month protection order against her ex-husband, a first in the nation’s capital.</p><p>“It’s a very important case. All of society was paying attention,” Guo Jianmei, a lawyer, told the Times. “We’ve been waiting for this for a long time.”</p><p>And although censorship remains widespread in China, Lee's court victory is also a testament to the growing power of social media to share information and avoid direct control by government censors. After Lee posted photos and an account of her experience of domestic violence on Sina Weibo, a microblogging service similar to Twitter, it quickly went viral</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/in_china_a_victory_for_womens_rights_and_the_power_of_social_media/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/in_china_a_victory_for_womens_rights_and_the_power_of_social_media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s new micro-video app is predictably flooded with porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/twitters_new_micro_video_app_is_predictably_flooded_with_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/twitters_new_micro_video_app_is_predictably_flooded_with_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vine users posting spicy 6-second clips have sparked a larger conversation about free speech and social media]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vine, Twitter's new micro-video application, lets people share up to 6 seconds of video as an endlessly looping clip. Interestingly, 6 seconds is also how long it took for people to start using it to share porn.</p><p>Porn? On the Internet? Who would have thought.</p><p>And rather than flying under the radar, this spicy new content came to very public attention this morning when an explicit clip (it was tagged #dildoplay, let's leave it at that) made its way onto Vine's "Editor's Picks" list. That means users who opened the application were automatically greeted with some very NSFW content.</p><p>Vine quickly issued an apology, but it may still be in hot water with Apple.</p><p>Vine is currently iOS-only, and Apple is notorious for its prudish policies around adult content, having recently banned a <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/22/3904356/500px-iso500-photo-apps-pulled-from-itunes-allegedly-over-nudes" target="_blank">popular photo sharing application</a> because of nude photos, even after the app's creator offered a fix to filter explicit images. Apple balked, claiming the content still violated its user guidelines.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/twitters_new_micro_video_app_is_predictably_flooded_with_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/twitters_new_micro_video_app_is_predictably_flooded_with_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweeting workers of the world, unite!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nlrb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers can't fire workers for collectively criticizing their workplace online]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until recently in the private sector, management has had total discretion as to whether employees can be fired for what they post on Facebook or Twitter about their company. Indeed, companies regularly have social media policies that discourage public online criticism by employees on personal social media platforms.</p><p>But, as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/technology/employers-social-media-policies-come-under-regulatory-scrutiny.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=0&amp;hp">reported </a>Tuesday, "in a series of recent rulings and advisories, labor regulators have declared many such blanket restrictions illegal. The National Labor Relations Board says workers have a right to discuss work conditions freely and without fear of retribution, whether the discussion takes place at the office or on Facebook."</p><p>The Times noted that the NLRB will enforce an end to restrictive online speech policies and will ensure companies rehire workers fired for social media comments. However, as Josh Eidelson <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2012/07/getting_fired_for_what_you_post_on_facebook.html">noted last year</a> for Slate when a number of cases brought the issue of social media comments to the NLRB's attention, the issue is not over whether an individual worker can be fired for critical comments on social media, but whether a group of workers collectively discussing their company can be protected from retribution:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>