<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Socialism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/socialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Parks and Recreation&#8221;: TV&#8217;s most progressive show</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NBC sitcom is just as ardent in its defense of government as it is fearless in its skewering of conservatives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a> NBC’s <em>PARKS AND RECREATION</em>, never shying from political controversy, examines current beltway tensions in ways one might expect from a more overtly political program. This season more than ever,<em> </em>the tendentious questions of American governance have become the show's lifeblood, its fictive small town of Pawnee, Indiana, struggling with political tribulations closely mirroring those on the national stage — and proposing some bold solutions.</p><p>The season’s first episode follows the lead character, Amy Poehler's Leslie Knope, to Washington DC, where she met real political figures such as Joe Biden (her hero), Olympia Snowe, Barbara Boxer, and John McCain. Recent episodes have been titled "Soda Tax" and "How a Bill Becomes a Law" and highlight the nitty-gritty — if comically histrionic — details about local politics. In addition, the show's constant use of innuendo surrounding current political events, reenactment of debates concerning economics and governance, and tongue-in-cheek references to the increasing conservatism of American politics have made <em>Parks and Rec</em> more a comedic primer in American politics than a primetime comedy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should liberals feel nostalgia for the old-school left?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Hobsbawm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irving howe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A closer look at the works of historians like Eric Hobsbawm suggests this sentimentalism may be misplaced]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The tradition of all the dead generations,” <a href="http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-brumaire/ch01.htm">Marx wrote</a> 150 years ago, “weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.” Today, with our politics trapped in capitalism’s endless fugue state, the nightmare that troubled Marx may seem to contemporary left-wingers like a pleasant dream of days gone by.<br /> <a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>At least the dead generations took Marx seriously. At least they had a powerful labor movement and center-left parties that believed in the welfare state. And at least Ralph Miliband, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-wDxoxn4Yo">the dead leftist</a> whose son is the living leader of Britain’s Labour Party, would never have answered a question about capitalism with a grudging obeisance to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/9544522/Ed-Miliband-interview-I-want-to-save-the-capitalism-my-father-hated.html">the creative power of BlackBerry</a>.</p><p>It’s easy to get nostalgic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>France passes gay marriage bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/france_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/france_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francois Hollande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation not only legalizes same-sex marriage but allows same-sex couples to adopt children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PARIS (AP) — The French Senate has voted to legalize same-sex marriage in France, putting a landmark bill on track to become law by summer.</p><p>The vote in the upper house of parliament — led by President Francois Hollande's Socialists — comes despite boisterous protests. Opponents — mostly conservatives and fervent Roman Catholics — have sought to defend traditional marriage.</p><p>Both houses of parliament will now take up a second reading to consider minor Senate changes to the bill passed in February by the National Assembly, also controlled by a Socialist-led majority.</p><p>The bill would allow gay marriage and let same-sex couples adopt children. On the campaign trail last year, Hollande pledged to push through such legislation if elected.</p><p>About a dozen mostly European nations already allow gay marriage.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/france_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/france_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota, socialist haven?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The booming Bank of North Dakota proves the oil-rich state is red in more ways than one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Dakota is the very definition of a red state. It voted 58 percent to 39 percent for Romney over Obama, and its statehouse and senate have a total of 104 Republicans and only 47 Democrats. The Republican super-majority is so conservative it recently passed the nation's most severe <a href="http://www.marshfieldnewsherald.com/viewart/20130322/MNH01/130322066/ND-becomes-first-state-pass-Fetal-Personhood-Ammendment">anti-abortion resolution</a> – a measure that declares a fertilized human egg has the same right to life as a fully formed person.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> But North Dakota is also red in another sense: it fully supports its state-owned Bank of North Dakota (BND), a socialist relic that exists nowhere else in America. Why is financial socialism still alive in North Dakota? Why haven't the North Dakotan free-market crusaders slain it dead?</p><p>Because it works.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategist in RNC reboot calls Obama a &#8220;socialist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Barbour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry Barbour, the nephew of former governor Haley Barbour, was an author of the RNC's plan to reshape the party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry Barbour, the nephew of the former governor of Mississippi and an author of the RNC's plan to reboot the party and broaden its appeal, thinks President Obama is a "socialist."</p><p>"We all want to make America strong economically and militarily and every other way but you can't do that if you're not in office," he told <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/288845-leader-in-gops-reboot-calls-obama-a-socialist">The Hill</a>. "We've got a socialist in office right now — how's that working for us?"</p><p>When pressed on his choice of words, Barbour said: "I don't care. I mean, look, I think he's a socialist. I'm not saying he doesn't love our country," he said. "No, I don't care."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Hugo Chávez and Rand Paul anti-imperialist BFFs?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/are_hugo_chavez_and_rand_paul_anti_imperialist_bffs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/are_hugo_chavez_and_rand_paul_anti_imperialist_bffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Venezuelan socialist and the Kentucky Tea Partyer, semi-united in kooky resistance to American hegemony]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might sound facetious to draw comparisons between <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/hugo_chavez">Hugo Chávez</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rand_paul">Rand Paul,</a> beyond the fact that they both made headline news this week. They’d have made a great sitcom duo, somewhat in the Harold and Kumar vein: the Latin loudmouth and the unctuous Kentuckian! They bicker endlessly about privatization vs. nationalization and, boy, do things get wild when their respective pals Ahmadinejad and Netanyahu come over! But then comes the heartwarming season-ender when they get baked on decriminalized Mexican sinsemilla, march against United States militarism and chain themselves to the doors of the World Bank! (And don’t you get the feeling they’re both <em>deadly</em> when it comes to the ladies?)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/are_hugo_chavez_and_rand_paul_anti_imperialist_bffs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/are_hugo_chavez_and_rand_paul_anti_imperialist_bffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hugo Chavez&#8217;s economic miracle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/hugo_chavezs_economic_miracle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/hugo_chavezs_economic_miracle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13220238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Venezuelan leader was often marginalized as a radical. But his brand of socialism achieved real economic gains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last decade in American politics, Hugo Chavez became a potent political weapon - within a few years of his ascent, he was transformed from just a leader of a neighboring nation into a boogeyman synonymous with extremism. Regularly invoked in over-the-top <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/01/obama-hugo-chavez-mitt-romney_n_2055927.html">political rhetoric</a>, Chavez's name became a decontextualized epithet to try to attach to a political opponent so as to make that opponent look like a radical. Because of this, America barely flinched upon hearing the news that the Bush administration tried to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/apr/21/usa.venezuela">orchestrate a coup</a> against the democratically elected Venezuelan leader.</p><p>Just to get it out of the way, I'll state the obvious: with respect to many policies, Chavez was no saint. He, for instance, amassed a <a href="http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/07/17/venezuela-concentration-and-abuse-power-under-ch-vez">troubling record</a> when it came to protecting human rights and basic democratic freedoms (though as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/opinion/why-chavez-was-re-elected.html?_r=0">Mark Weisbrot</a> of the Center for Economic and Policy notes, "Venezuela is recognized by many scholars to be more democratic than it was in the pre-Chávez era"). His rein also coincided with a <a href="http://world.time.com/2012/09/25/will-venezuelas-pandemic-of-crime-destabilize-hugo-chavezs-regime/">boom in violent crime</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/hugo_chavezs_economic_miracle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/hugo_chavezs_economic_miracle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Marx and the semantics of a &#8220;post-work left&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/karl_marx_and_the_semantics_of_a_post_work_left_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/karl_marx_and_the_semantics_of_a_post_work_left_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives like Ross Douthat disregard the free, productive activity that is lacking in capitalism's wage labor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>Last Sunday, the unthinkable happened: Ross Douthat wrote something halfway sensible.</p><p>To be sure, his column <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/24/opinion/sunday/douthat-a-world-without-work.html">“A World Without Work”</a> is no "Communist Manifesto." But I read Douthat, in this deeply conflicted piece, as a metaphorical three-year-old attempting to put together a jigsaw puzzle: He finally has all the pieces, but he just can’t get them to fit together. He admits that work in today’s world is “grinding,” meaningless, alienated, coercive. He argues that government should play an active role in promoting human flourishing. And he seriously considers the position that “the right to not have a boss is actually the hardest won of modern freedoms.”</p><p>These are the building blocks of a left politics for the 21st century — but Douthat tries instead to jam them into his conservative lens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/karl_marx_and_the_semantics_of_a_post_work_left_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/karl_marx_and_the_semantics_of_a_post_work_left_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz: Congress and Harvard Law School are crawling with commies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/ted_cruz_says_harvard_law_school_is_run_by_communists_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/ted_cruz_says_harvard_law_school_is_run_by_communists_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas senator has made no secret of his McCarthyist leanings. Neither has the Christian right that supports him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>The wonderful Jane Mayer <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/02/ted-cruz-sees-red-not-crimson-at-harvard.html#ixzz2LePAodFP" target="_blank">recounts</a> an Americans for Prosperity rally she covered in Texas two and half years ago, at which now-Texas Senator Ted Cruz “accused the Harvard Law School of harboring a dozen Communists on its faculty when he studied there” in the early 1990s. The revelation of these baseless, McCarthy-esque accusations sheds light on the origins of Cruz’s baseless, McCarthy-esque questioning of Secretary of Defense nominee Chuck Hagel. (The best part of Mayer’s piece is the bewilderment of Charles Fried, a Republican who served in the Reagan administration and later taught Cruz at Harvard, who diplomatically told Mayer that Cruz’s statement “lacks nuance.”)</p><p>Mayer adds:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/ted_cruz_says_harvard_law_school_is_run_by_communists_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/ted_cruz_says_harvard_law_school_is_run_by_communists_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer brags: &#8220;I was the first to call Obama a socialist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/house_goper_brags_i_was_the_first_to_call_obama_a_socialist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/house_goper_brags_i_was_the_first_to_call_obama_a_socialist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Paul Broun, who is running for senate in Georgia, boasted about fighting "tooth-and-nail" against Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., who is running for senate in 2014, played up his right-wing cred in a fundraising email, boasting that he was the first one to label President Obama "a socialist," also noting that his record and that of Ron Paul "are virtually identical."</p><p>As the <a href="http://www.ajc.com/weblogs/political-insider/2013/feb/13/paul-broun-i-was-first-call-obama-socialist/">Atlanta Journal-Constitution</a> reports, Broun has been publicly playing the cool contender since announcing his run last week. But on the side to potential donors, he's brandishing his Tea Party background. "I was the first Member of Congress to call him a socialist who embraces Marxist-Leninist policies like government control of health care and redistribution of wealth," Broun wrote in an email.</p><p>He continued:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/house_goper_brags_i_was_the_first_to_call_obama_a_socialist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/house_goper_brags_i_was_the_first_to_call_obama_a_socialist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French president wants to ban homework</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/french_president_wants_to_ban_homework/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/french_president_wants_to_ban_homework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francois Hollande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Francois Hollande's reforms aim to promote equality in education ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France's President Francois Hollande plans to <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/weird-wide-web/french-president-francois-hollande-homework">ban school homework</a>. It's not just the populist move of the century to win the hearts of soon-to-be voters, Hollande's plan aims to assert greater equality in the education system.</p><p>The recently elected socialist president announced his education reform proposal last week. "An education program is, by definition, a societal program. Work should be done at school, rather than at home," Hollande said. Under the plan, the school week would be slightly extended to compensate for axing homework.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/french_president_wants_to_ban_homework/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/french_president_wants_to_ban_homework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. media responds to Hugo Chavez&#8217;s reelection</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/us_media_responds_to_hugo_chavezs_re_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/us_media_responds_to_hugo_chavezs_re_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neoliberal disdain, some corners of support and a healthy dose of hypocrisy in post-election comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing about the U.S. media response to Hugo Chavez's reelection in Venezuela Sunday has been surprising. Save for a few corners of support for the socialist leader, American pundits have -- with a strong dose of neoliberal ideology -- criticized his record and the means through which he has remained in power.</p><p>Chavez won the mandate of another six years in power (adding to his 14-year tenure) with more than 54 percent of the vote, beating challenger Henrique Capriles Radonski. A number of conservative U.S. news outlets were quick to challenge the validity of the large margin (which was nonetheless the weakest margin the socialist leader has ever enjoyed in an election).</p><p>Fox News <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/1885574534001/allegations-of-voter-fraud-in-chavez-re-election-victory/">reported that</a> "exit polls told a different story." In an example of what Glenn Greenwald<a href="https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/255290430252535808"> described via Twitter </a>as "revealing and amusing … cognitive dissonance" in Western media over this election, the Fox News host decried the Venezuelan result, suggesting that even if there was no technical foul play, Chavez had overly influenced the elections with money and media monopolies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/us_media_responds_to_hugo_chavezs_re_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/us_media_responds_to_hugo_chavezs_re_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chavez wins re-election according to electoral council</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/chavez_wins_re_election_according_to_electoral_council/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/chavez_wins_re_election_according_to_electoral_council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13033269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Venezuelan leader won another six year term]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) -- President Hugo Chavez won re-election on Sunday, defeating challenger Henrique Capriles, Venezuela's electoral council said.</p><p>With most votes counted, Chavez had more than 54 percent of the vote, and Capriles had 45 percent, National Electoral Council president Tibisay Lucena said. She said 81 percent of the nearly 19 million registered voters cast ballots.</p><p>It was Chavez's third re-election victory in nearly 14 years in office. The victory gives Chavez another six-year term to cement his legacy and press more forcefully for a transition to socialism in the country with the world's largest proven oil reserves.</p><p>Fireworks exploded in downtown Caracas, and Chavez's supporters celebrated waving flags and jumping for joy outside the presidential palace.</p><p>Chavez won more than 7.4 million votes, beating Capriles by more than 1.2 million votes, Lucena said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/chavez_wins_re_election_according_to_electoral_council/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/chavez_wins_re_election_according_to_electoral_council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do jobs come from?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/where_do_jobs_come_from/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/where_do_jobs_come_from/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13011602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid the campaign rhetoric, it can be easy to forget. A quick explainer on how the labor cycle works]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In discussions about the Fed's actions yesterday, it occurred to me that many of the explanations that link the Fed’s <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/the-fed-moves-but-will-it-help/">moves</a> to stronger job growth leave out a number of steps in the middle. It’s, of course, not the case that the Fed buys MBS or announces they’ll keep rates low and jobs that weren’t there before suddenly appear. There’s a chain of events that needs to occur, and there’s plenty of slip twixt the cup and the lip.</p><p>So let’s talk about the process of job creation, both in normal times and in times like these.</p><p>Demand for labor is so-called “derived demand” -- derived from the demand for goods and services that firms sell to consumers and investors. That can be anything from a Snickers bar (consumer good) to a steel bar (intermediate good) to barroom (investment good). As I explained in greater detail <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/do-politicians-really-have-much-to-do-with-job-creation/">here</a>, in normal times, job creation is a function of a virtuous cycle where growth generates income which drives consumption, signaling investors renew opportunities, generating more growth, etc.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/where_do_jobs_come_from/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/where_do_jobs_come_from/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How owners are ruining the games we love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/tom_gallagher_on_bad_sports_how_owners_are_ruining_the_games_we_love_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/tom_gallagher_on_bad_sports_how_owners_are_ruining_the_games_we_love_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12962651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The intelligent sports fan’s guide to socialism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INSTEAD OF YELLING, “Kill the umpire,” as they supposedly did at nineteenth century baseball games, Dave Zirin’s <em>Bad Sports</em>, in its thoroughly reasonable rant against team owners, suggests a twenty-first century chant of “Jail the owner.” He could have lifted a subtitle from George Bernard Shaw and called it <em>The Intelligent Sports Fan’s Guide to Socialism</em> were it not for all of the flacks currently muddying the waters by claiming that Barack Obama is a socialist. Just as some once thought the target audience for Shaw’s <em>The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism</em> was not up to the subject, there will be some who doubt today’s sports fan’s ability to ponder questions deeper than clutching or choking. Unlike those who see the ritual attachment to groups of athletes in matching uniforms as a sign of mental deficit, Zirin insists that within every sports fan there exists a rational kernel. For he is one of us. And his socialism, by the way, is that of the Green Bay Packers.</p><p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/tom_gallagher_on_bad_sports_how_owners_are_ruining_the_games_we_love_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/tom_gallagher_on_bad_sports_how_owners_are_ruining_the_games_we_love_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How corporations have made America like the USSR</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/the_new_totalitarianism_how_american_corporations_have_made_america_like_the_soviet_union_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/the_new_totalitarianism_how_american_corporations_have_made_america_like_the_soviet_union_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12958788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free-market capitalism was supposed to save us from faceless apparatchiks. But that's not what happened]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great power struggle of the 20th century was the competition between Soviet-style communism and "free-market" corporatism for domination of the world's resources. In America, it's taken for granted that Soviet communism lost (though China's more capitalist variant seems to be doing well), and the superiority of neo-liberal economics -- as epitomized by the great multinational corporations -- was thus affirmed for all time and eternity.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p>There's a small problem with this, though. An old bit of wisdom says: choose your enemies carefully, because over time, you will tend to become the very thing you most strongly resist. One of the most striking things about our victorious corporations now is the degree to which they've taken on some of the most noxious and Kafkaesque attributes of the Soviet system -- too often leaving their employees, customers, and other stakeholders just as powerless over their own fates as the unhappy citizens of those old centrally planned economies of the USSR were back in the day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/the_new_totalitarianism_how_american_corporations_have_made_america_like_the_soviet_union_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/the_new_totalitarianism_how_american_corporations_have_made_america_like_the_soviet_union_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
