<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > soda tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/soda_tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tax the annoying!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/tax_the_annoying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/tax_the_annoying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pigovian taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soda tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why some economists want to tax the things we do that negatively affect others ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could a tax on daily nuisances, like talking during movies, really solve revenue gridlock in Washington? A growing number of bipartisan economists seem to think so.</p><p>In a piece for the New York Times today, Adam Davidson of Planet Money <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/magazine/should-we-tax-people-for-being-annoying.html" target="_blank">asks</a>: Should we tax the things that annoy us? Like, say, traffic jams?</p><blockquote><p>Driving home during the holidays, I found myself trapped in the permanent traffic jam on I-95 near Bridgeport, Conn. In the back seat, my son was screaming. All around, drivers had the menaced, lifeless expressions that people get when they see cars lined up to the horizon. It was enough to make me wish for congestion pricing — a tax paid by drivers to enter crowded areas at peak times. After all, it costs drivers about $16 to enter central London during working hours. A few years ago, it nearly caught on in New York. And on that drive home, I would have happily paid whatever it cost to persuade some other drivers that it wasn’t worth it for them to be on the road.</p> <p>Instead, we all suffered. Each car added an uncharged burden to every other person. In fact, everyone on the road was doing all sorts of harm to society without paying the cost.... Add up all the cars in all the traffic jams across the country, and it’s clear that drivers are costing hundreds of billions of dollars a year that we don’t pay for.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/tax_the_annoying/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/tax_the_annoying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
