<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Soviet Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/soviet_union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What to watch instead of &#8220;Winnie the Pooh&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/what_to_watch_russian_winnie_the_pooh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/what_to_watch_russian_winnie_the_pooh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/07/14/what_to_watch_russian_winnie_the_pooh</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the yellow bear makes a comeback on the big screen, his Soviet doppelganger Vinni Pukh deserves some love too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With its <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/07/12/winnie_the_pooh">totally un-Pixarlated look and nougaty nostalgia core</a>, Disney's new "Winnie the Pooh" movie might be the perfect antidote for the summer 3-D blockbuster. Then again, do you really want to pay $12 for a film whose main appeal is that it feels <em>old</em>? Not to get all Eeyore on you, but I'd just as soon fork over my money for something I haven't seen before. (Which also rules out the new "Transformers," with <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island">its reused fight sequences</a>.)</p><p>I know I'm not the intended audience for "Winnie the Pooh," and by all rights, it looks like a very cute picture. But if you're looking for a more far-out interpretation of A.A. Milne's children's classic, check out the Soviet-era "Vinni Pukh" cartoons (sometimes translated as Vinnie-Puh), <a href="http://www.animator.ru/db/?ver=eng&amp;p=show_film&amp;fid=6758">a trilogy of Russian shorts</a> based on Boris Zakhoder's translation of "Winnie the Pooh."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/what_to_watch_russian_winnie_the_pooh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/what_to_watch_russian_winnie_the_pooh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gorbachev accuses Putin of contempt for voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/21/russia_gorbachev_criticizes_putin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/21/russia_gorbachev_criticizes_putin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/21/russia_gorbachev_criticizes_putin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Soviet leader also says Russian government only has imitations of parliamentary and judicial systems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has accused Russia's current rulers of conceit and contempt for voters in his harshest criticism of the government yet.</p><p>Gorbachev on Monday criticized Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Dmitry Medvedev for saying that they will decide between them who should run for president in Russia's March 2012 presidential vote.</p><p>Gorbachev said the statements show an "incredible conceit" and disrespect for voters. Gorbachev has previously avoided personal criticism of Putin, who is widely expected to reclaim presidency.</p><p>Gorbachev, who will turn 80 next week, also denounced the main pro-Kremlin United Russia party as a "bad copy" of the Soviet Communist Party and said that Russia has only imitations of a parliament and judicial system.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/21/russia_gorbachev_criticizes_putin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/21/russia_gorbachev_criticizes_putin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How I Ended This Summer&#8221;: A thriller from the Russian Arctic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/how_i_ended/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/how_i_ended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/02/03/how_i_ended</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: "The Shining" meets "Shutter Island" in the subtle, spectacular "How I Ended This Summer"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel pretty safe in telling you that there are layers of social and political allegory beneath <a href="http://www.filmmovement.com/theatrical/index.asp?MerchandiseID=233">"How I Ended This Summer,"</a> Russian director Alexei Popogrebsky's thriller about two men alone in the Arctic. I mean, it's a Russian movie -- that goes with the turf. But you don't have to go spelunking for deep meanings below this impressively crafted piece of cinema to enjoy it. Filmed at an actual meteorological research station in the Russian Arctic coast that was built under Stalin, "How I Ended This Summer" combines memorable images of the gorgeous, rugged wilderness, meticulous sound design that emphasizes the characters' isolation, a dash of dark wit and a dose of madness.</p><p>Yes, if you're keeping score at home that makes three weeks running that Pick of the Week has settled on a foreign film from a snowy northern country (with a fourth, I suspect, on the way next week). I'm not exactly doing it on purpose, but it may well have something to do with the amazing winter those of us in the eastern two-thirds of the country are enduring. Actually, compared to the frozen slush of the Northeastern megalopolis in February, the desolate beauty, perpetual sunlight and endless seafood buffet of an Arctic Ocean summer look like Barbados.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/how_i_ended/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/how_i_ended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How &#8220;Battleship Potemkin&#8221; reshaped Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/potemkin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/potemkin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/01/11/potemkin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An electrifying new restoration reveals Eisenstein's Soviet-era classic as pioneering action cinema]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody who thinks that Sergei Eisenstein's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000V7HFL4?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000V7HFL4">"Battleship Potemkin"</a> is an "art film" either hasn't seen the movie at all or had it ruined for them by some combination of a butchered print and a tedious film-history professor. As a remarkable new restoration of the 1925 Soviet silent classic makes clear, "Battleship Potemkin" is first and foremost an action drama, a work of straightforward emotion and pulse-quickening tension. This taut, 71-minute picture is stitched together from more than 1,300 shots, very few of them lasting more than three or four seconds. For better or worse, this film's true revolutionary legacy is not art cinema but Hollywood; it's got a lot more in common with Tony Scott's <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/11/10/unstoppable">"Unstoppable"</a> than it does with Andrei Tarkovsky.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/potemkin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/potemkin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Disco and Atomic War&#8221;: How David Hasselhoff won the Cold War</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/12/disco_atomic_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/12/disco_atomic_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/11/12/disco_atomic_war</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hilarious Estonian documentary (yes, really!) asks whether disco and "Dallas" defeated Communism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You won't see another documentary all year long that packs quite the same combination of pure fun and eye-opening information as <a href="http://icarusfilms.com/new2010/disco.html">"Disco and Atomic War,"</a> a strange and delightful work of historical collage from Estonian filmmaker Jaak Kilmi. No, I know -- I can feel you slipping into a coma out there: <em>O'Hehir is trying to convince me to watch an Estonian documentary!</em> But hang on a second while I fling a pitcher of ice water in your face and explain that this particular Estonian documentary features David Hasselhoff (in his classic "Knight Rider" phase) and dueling Finnish- and Soviet-made instructional videos about disco dancing. And you have not lived, my friends, until you have seen a bunch of 50ish Finnish people in mid-'70s leisure wear completely giving up the funk.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/12/disco_atomic_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/12/disco_atomic_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Carlos&#8221;: International terror, Sopranos-style</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/15/carlos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/15/carlos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/10/14/carlos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edgar Ram]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some obvious reasons and others we can guess at, quite a few 21st-century filmmakers seem drawn to the shadowy and outrageous history of 1960s and '70s radicalism, especially at its outermost fringes. <a href="http://www.ifcfilms.com/films/carlos">"Carlos,"</a> the dazzling, epic-scale movie and/or mini-series from French director <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2009/05/15/oliver_assayas">Olivier Assayas,</a> is the latest and probably greatest example, but it's definitely not alone. In the last few years we've also seen Steven Soderbergh's <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2008/12/12/soderbergh/index.html">"Che,"</a> Uli Edel's Oscar-nominated <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex/feature/2009/08/25/baader_meinhof">"Baader Meinhof Complex,"</a> Japanese director Koji Wakamatsu's docudrama <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0923869/">"United Red Army"</a> (never released in the United States) and Italian director Marco Bellocchio's <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2005/11/10/btm">"Good Morning, Night."</a> (It might be stretching the point to include Steven Spielberg's 2005 <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2005/12/23/munich/">"Munich,"</a> but it's definitely related.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/15/carlos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/15/carlos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unmaking of a company man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/united_states_military_imperialism_education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/united_states_military_imperialism_education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/08/26/united_states_military_imperialism_education</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After hewing to military orthodoxy for years, my real education began in the shadow of the Brandenberg Gate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worldly ambition inhibits true learning. Ask me. I know. A young man in a hurry is nearly uneducable: He knows what he wants and where he's headed; when it comes to looking back or entertaining heretical thoughts, he has neither the time nor the inclination. All that counts is that he is going somewhere. Only as ambition wanes does education become a possibility.</p><p>My own education did not commence until I had reached middle age. I can fix its start date with precision: for me, education began in Berlin, on a winter's evening, at the Brandenburg Gate, not long after the Berlin Wall had fallen.</p><p>As an officer in the U.S. Army I had spent considerable time in Germany. Until that moment, however, my family and I had never had occasion to visit this most famous of German cities, still littered with artifacts of a deeply repellent history. At the end of a long day of exploration, we found ourselves in what had, until just months before, been the communist East. It was late and we were hungry, but I insisted on walking the length of the Unter den Linden, from the River Spree to the gate itself. A cold rain was falling and the pavement glistened. The buildings lining the avenue, dating from the era of Prussian kings, were dark, dirty, and pitted. Few people were about. It was hardly a night for sightseeing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/united_states_military_imperialism_education/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/united_states_military_imperialism_education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocking news: The world is stable!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/08/stable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/08/stable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/12/07/stable</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China dominance? U.S. decline and fall? Believe it when you see it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a few weeks, the second decade of the 21st century will be upon us. (Note to purists who insist that it will begin on Jan. 1, 2011: Get a life.) The first decade of this century is likely to be remembered as the Decade From Hell. It began with a stock market crash and the 9/11 attacks. It ended with the greatest global economic crisis since the Great Depression and deepening U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan and Pakistan. A decade's worth of stock market gains were swiftly erased and for 10 years there has been no new net job creation outside the areas of healthcare, education and government.</p><p>The oughts can't end a moment too soon.</p><p>What does the decade of 2010-20 hold in store? There is already a consensus among America's commentariat. We are told that the near future will see the decline of the United States and the rise of China in global power politics and, as an added attraction, the decline of the nation-state.</p><p>Yeah, sure. I'll believe it when I see it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/08/stable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/08/stable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Berlin Wall fell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/uncivil_society/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/uncivil_society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2009/10/14/uncivil_society</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Kotkin's fascinating "Uncivil Society" presents a revisionist account of Communism's failure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Berlin Wall fell 20 years ago this November, it seemed, from the outside, to have simply melted away like the Wicked Witch of the West after a good dousing. Like the witch, the Soviet Union and its Eastern bloc had appeared to be an implacable and wily adversary, an aspect of modern life as inevitable as death and taxes. But Dorothy's astonishment at discovering that a mere pailful of dirty water had foiled her nemesis was nothing compared to that of the average Westerner upon seeing the Wall crumble for, it seemed, no reason at all. Suddenly, television was filled with images of mobs of East Germans dancing on the concrete monolith that, a few weeks earlier, they couldn't even approach without being gunned down. Not a drop of blood had been shed. How did <em>that</em> happen?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/uncivil_society/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/uncivil_society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critic&#8217;s Picks: The tragic twilight of Leon Trotsky</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/trotsky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/trotsky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critics' Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/critics_picks/2009/10/01/trotsky</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A gripping new account captures the October Revolution's great intellectual facing doom (and feeding bunnies)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what your political orientation, if you believe -- or ever did believe -- in the potential betterment of humanity, then you've got something to learn from the strange and tragic story of Leon Trotsky. It's a tale of pride and power and political failure, of genius turned to the service of dogged, dogmatic conviction, of a supremely intelligent man who destroyed others in the name of a cause that then destroyed him. It was a story that finally reached its end in 1940, in a legendary encounter with an assassin armed with a mountaineer's pickax, as Stanford professor Bertrand Patenaude illustrates in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FTrotsky-Downfall-Revolutionary-Bertrand-Patenaude%2Fdp%2F0060820683%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1254345664%26sr%3D1-1&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"Trotsky: Downfall of a Revolutionary,"</a> his gripping, cinematic new book about the last years of the Ukrainian Jew who was born Lev Davidovich Bronstein. (Whatever your feelings about Trotsky, the story of his murder by Ram&#243;n Mercader, the suave Stalinist agent who had wormed his way into the heavily guarded Trotsky compound outside Mexico City, may give you sleepless nights.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/trotsky/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/trotsky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rape in Berlin: Facing the truth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/17/berlin_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/17/berlin_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/07/17/berlin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousands of German women were sexually assaulted near the end of WW II. Brutal payback, a war crime or both? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10049392' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/07/story26.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Strand Releasing</p><p class="caption">Nina Hoss in "A Woman in Berlin."</p><p>At first glance, Max F&#228;rberb&#246;ck's World War II melodrama <a href="http://www.strandreleasing.com/">"A Woman in Berlin"</a> is exactly the kind of worthy but unremarkable foreign-language movie likely to come and go quickly, hitting a few big-city theaters on its way to DVD. But however and wherever you see it, "A Woman in Berlin" is a distinctive achievement, a World War II movie unlike any other and one of the few films ever to address a topic that makes almost everyone want to look away: What happens to women in wartime.</p><p>Since long before the time of Helen of Troy -- who was Helen of Sparta until the Trojan prince Paris snatched her -- women's bodies have been among the principal spoils of war. Even in the modern age, when women are theoretically regarded as human beings rather than property, this old pattern has reasserted itself on a regular basis. "A Woman in Berlin" is based on the notorious 1953 memoir by a woman who called herself Anonyma. She was among the thousands of girls and women who were repeatedly raped by occupying Russian soldiers amid the smoldering ruins of Berlin during the chaotic final stages of World War II. As many of the younger and more attractive women did, Anonyma turned to a Red Army officer for protection, preferring to be a kept woman rather than the sex toy of any random infantryman.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/17/berlin_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/17/berlin_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>143</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The un-American way of life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/03/communism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/03/communism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2009/07/03/communism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A controversial new history of Communism suggests that most everything we think we know about it is wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most adults now living were born during the Cold War, a 45-year standoff between competing political and economic systems that threatened civilization with nuclear annihilation and asked virtually every human being on earth to pick a side. One of those systems was called Communism, and it cast such a long, dark shadow across the 20th century that it's amazing to reflect how thoroughly it has vanished from the scene and how poorly its history is understood.</p><p>Genuine support for Communism -- meaning the Marxist-Leninist governing ideology of the Soviet Union and its allies, as distinct from various flavors of socialism or social democracy -- was minimal in the Western world, despite the United States government's best efforts to uncover it. But you didn't have to endorse Communism to be fascinated by it. Simply the existence of that alternate model, with its claim of scientific inevitability and its alleged utopian aims, had a bizarre, distorting effect on political discourse clear across the ideological spectrum.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/03/communism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/03/communism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man who shook the Kremlin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who died this week, was instrumental in bringing the Soviet Union to its knees, and he never wavered from his belief in a writer's moral responsibility to truth and beauty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who died on Aug. 3 at the age of 89, was, by most accounts, a difficult man. His sizable oeuvre, urgent and prophetic in its condemnation of communism, left little room for moral inaction; he spent nearly two decades in the United States, but the comforts of America also disgusted him. And when he returned to his homeland in the 1990s, its headlong rush to materialism -- a McDonald's in Moscow! -- offered a jarring contrast to the image of Holy Russia that had so long beguiled him. In the end, one gets the sense that the modern world disappointed Solzhenitsyn so thoroughly that he could only find refuge in words from which he fashioned a country -- an agrarian, God-fearing Russia -- scrubbed free of the distasteful century into which he was born. </p><p> The nearly 30 works he published were instrumental in bringing the Soviet Union to its knees, but none struck as deeply as his first, a slim volume called "A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich." Its author was an artillery officer who, during World War II, had depicted Stalin unfavorably in a letter to a colleague, earning himself an eight-year sentence in a labor camp. In the camp he survived his first bout with cancer; then, facing internal exile in the outer reaches of the empire, began to write of his experiences while teaching science at a high school, guided by Dostoevski's insight that "beauty will save the world." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dancing with the New Tsars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/12/new_tsars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/12/new_tsars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/06/12/new_tsars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With their tricked-out yachts, trained servants and diamond-frosted toys, newly rich Russians have invaded London -- and thrown Britain's elite into a royal tizzy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a recent evening in London's nightclub-of-the-moment, Movida, I'm at the sleek steel bar, surrounded by a gaggle of good-looking blondes. Taking in their gaudy Fendi clutch bags, their air of hard confidence and the dinky diamonds embedded in their BlackBerrys, I recognize the breed immediately: They are London's New Russians, super spenders from the land of oligarchs and post-communist ostentation. They slice the air with black credit cards, beckoning for champagne, more champagne and Stolichnaya Elit, the finest potato juice known to man. As I struggle in vain to get the bartender's attention, the lights dim, the crowd parts and a twangy Russian folk song starts blaring from the speakers -- <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalinka_%28song%29">"Kalinka,"</a> I think. Two strapping black-shirted young men are making their way across the dance floor, bearing an ornate sedan chair. Feeling a little like a slave in Pharaonic Egypt, I jostle over to get a look. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/06/12/new_tsars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/06/12/new_tsars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s the superpower now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/12/russian_oil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/12/russian_oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/05/12/russian_oil</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As oil prices drain the U.S. of military power and influence, Russia is rising as a world force again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nineteen years ago, the fall of the Berlin Wall effectively eliminated the Soviet Union as the world's other superpower. Yes, the USSR as a political entity stumbled on for another two years, but it was clearly an ex-superpower from the moment it lost control over its satellites in Eastern Europe. </p><p> Less than a month ago, the United States similarly lost its claim to superpower status when a barrel of crude oil roared past $110 on the international market, gasoline prices crossed the $3.50 threshold at American pumps, and diesel fuel topped $4. As was true of the USSR following the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, the USA will no doubt continue to stumble on like the superpower it once was; but as the nation's economy continues to be eviscerated to pay for its daily oil fix, it, too, will be seen by increasing numbers of savvy observers as an ex-superpower in the making. </p><p> That the fall of the Berlin Wall spelled the erasure of the Soviet Union's superpower status was obvious to international observers at the time. After all, the USSR visibly ceased to exercise dominion over an empire (and an associated military-industrial complex) encompassing nearly half of Europe and much of Central Asia. The relationship between rising oil prices and the obliteration of America's superpower status is, however, hardly as self-evident. So let's consider the connection. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/12/russian_oil/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/12/russian_oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America needs realists, not  William Kristol</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/16/realism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/16/realism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/01/16/realism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the New York Times wants true diversity on its Op-Ed pages, it should hire foreign policy realists, not ideologues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In its response to letters protesting the recent hiring of hard-line neoconservative <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/election_2008/2007/12/30/bloggers/">William Kristol</a> as a weekly Op-Ed columnist, the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_new_york_times/">New York Times</a> described the decision as the result of a "long and thoughtful process" by a paper committed to "vibrant political discourse." Editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal said critics of the move were being "intolerant" and complained about a "weird fear of opposing views." </p><p>Hiring Kristol did not bring an "opposing view" to the Times' Op-Ed page, of course, because columnist David Brooks already represents the same worldview that Kristol does. Nor does the Times' roster of liberal pundits provide a full complement of "opposing views." Most <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/liberals/">liberal</a> commentators share the neocons' belief that it is America's right and responsibility to exercise "global leadership," even when that role involves the aggressive use of American military power and constant interference in other countries' affairs. The Times' Thomas Friedman was an energetic supporter of the Iraq war until it went south, and Nicholas Kristof is a passionate advocate of U.S. intervention in Darfur. Columnists like Maureen Dowd and Frank Rich have been sharply critical of the neoconservatives' worst follies, but both proceed from the familiar liberal internationalism that has characterized the American <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/foreign_policy/">foreign policy</a> establishment for many years. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/16/realism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/16/realism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The raven has flown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/07/raven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/07/raven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/garrison_keillor//2007/11/07/raven</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've missed out on Halloween, my only chance to open my beak and screech a prophetic message, "Nevermore!"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was all set to be a raven for <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/halloween/">Halloween</a> and don a long black cape and a beak and feathery wristlets, but I got stuck that afternoon at the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/neurology/">neurologist's,</a> who I'd gone to see about chronic headaches, and I sat in his waiting room reading old Peoples until finally he put me through the neurology dance -- tap tap tap, touch your nose, stand on one foot, close your eyes, hop hop hop -- and by the time he'd decided he didn't know what caused the headaches and I had driven home, Halloween was mostly over. </p><p>All the little kids dressed up as princesses and animals and superheroes were done for the night and only the sullen <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/teenagers/">teenagers</a> remained, who don't bother with costumes -- they simply go as teenagers. I suppose I could've put on the raven suit and lurked in the shadows, but a 6-foot-4-inch raven could send a sensitive child careening down the slippery slope toward a life of therapy. So I put away the raven outfit for next year. I come from a town where people celebrated Halloween by digging graves in their front yards and dressing up as corpses and lying in the holes, waiting to snatch at children's ankles, but that was long ago and everything was scarier then. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/07/raven/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/07/raven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seizing American supremacy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/22/american_decline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/22/american_decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/08/22/american_decline</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throughout history, rising powers have overtaken superpowers. The United States will not prove an exception.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States stood tall -- militarily invincible, economically unrivaled, diplomatically uncontestable, and the dominating force on information channels worldwide. The next century was to be the true "American century," with the rest of the world molding itself in the image of the sole superpower. </p><p>Yet, with not even a decade of this century behind us, we are already witnessing the rise of a multipolar world in which new powers are challenging different aspects of American supremacy -- Russia and China in the forefront, with regional powers Venezuela and Iran forming the second rank. These emergent powers are primed to erode American hegemony, not confront it, singly or jointly. </p><p>How and why has the world evolved in this way so soon? The Bush administration's debacle in <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/iraq/">Iraq</a> is certainly a major factor in this transformation, a classic example of an imperialist power, brimming with hubris, overextending itself. To the relief of many -- in the United States and elsewhere -- the Iraq fiasco has demonstrated the striking limitations of power for the globe's highest-tech, most destructive military machine. In Iraq, Brent Scowcroft, national security advisor to two U.S. presidents, concedes in a recent Op-Ed, "We are being wrestled to a draw by opponents who are not even an organized state adversary." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/22/american_decline/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/22/american_decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boisterous Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/23/yeltsin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/23/yeltsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2007/04/23/yeltsin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Clinton, Billy Graham, Helen Thomas and others recall Russian President Yeltsin's confidence, rough charm and liberal ways with drink.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Helen Thomas, journalist. "Relishing the attention"</b> </p><p>The disapproving look I got from Barbara Bush at a state dinner in honor of Russian President Boris Yeltsin. He was seated at the table next to mine and, thinking of my nieces and nephews and wanting to come up with some historic memento of the occasion, I asked Yeltsin to sign my menu card. Sitting next to me was the wife of James Billington, head of the Library of Congress and a renowned Russia scholar. When she saw what I did, she asked me to get an autograph for her husband. So I again defied the gods of protocol and approached Yeltsin. He graciously obliged. He was having a great time, and enjoying being the center of attention. When I caught Mrs. Bush's look, I felt a bit uncomfortable. But I was not sorry I had gotten the autograph, especially for the nation's top librarian. (Washington, D.C., 1990) </p><p><i>From "Front Row at the White House: My Life and Times," by Helen Thomas (Lisa Drew Book/Scribner, 1991)</i> </p><p><b>Billy Graham, evangelist. "Interest in religion"</b> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/23/yeltsin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/23/yeltsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No time to heal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/03/gerald_ford_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/03/gerald_ford_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//blumenthal/2007/01/03/gerald_ford</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ford's posthumous condemnation of the Iraq war shows that the struggle for the soul of the GOP begun in the Nixon years is as relevant now as ever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the holiday interregnum between the election of the new Congress and its swearing in, the death of former President Gerald R. Ford at the age of 93 evoked nostalgia for his interim "time to heal" (the title of his memoir) after the resignation of President Nixon. Like all nostalgia, it was distorting and disabling. Surprisingly, the one shattering the false mood was none other than Ford himself, speaking from the grave. Beyond the River Styx he could hardly silence the broadcasters attempting to outdo one another in reaching for high notes of banality. But he left behind words cautioning against the abuse of history, especially by those who served as his aides, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, who twisted the lessons of his presidency to provide the underpinnings of George W. Bush's policies. Ford's condemnation demonstrated the continued relevance of the contentious politics that enveloped his administration and revealed just how little healing has occurred among the divided Republican elites since Richard Nixon's fall. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/01/03/gerald_ford_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/03/gerald_ford_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

