<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/star_trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood sexism is somehow getting worse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/hollywood_misogyny_is_somehow_getting_worse_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/hollywood_misogyny_is_somehow_getting_worse_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tyee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast and Furious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study finds that women were grossly underrepresented in front of and behind the screen in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thetyee.ca/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/logo-4.png" alt="The Tyee" align="left" width="150" /></a></p><p>Every time I look at the film listings lately my heart sinks. It's hard out here for a woman. If you're packing a pair of ovaries, might as well pack it in mama. There's very little here for you.</p><p>Let's take a look at the films currently playing at the Scotiabank Theatre -- <em>Fast and Furious 6</em>, <em>Star Trek</em>, <em>Iron Man 3D</em> and <em>Oblivion</em>. All of these films star men, were made by men, and are principally about men. Not only that, but when they're released in the theatre, they're critiqued mainly by even more men (91 per cent of critics writing for major entertainment magazines and/or websites are of the male persuasion). These critiques are then published in magazines and aired on TV and media outlets that are also owned by almost entirely by men (women make up more than 50 per cent of the population but they hold less than seven percent of all TV and radio station licenses in the U.S.).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/hollywood_misogyny_is_somehow_getting_worse_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/hollywood_misogyny_is_somehow_getting_worse_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS official apologizes for lavish spending</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/irs_official_apologizes_for_lavish_spending_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/irs_official_apologizes_for_lavish_spending_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Oversight and Government Reform Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faris Fink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deputy tells House Committee that taxpayer dollars were wasted on expenditures like "Star Trek" parody videos]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — An Internal Revenue Service official whose division staged a lavish $4.1 million training conference and who starred as Mr. Spock in a "Star Trek" parody shown at the 2010 gathering conceded to Congress on Thursday that taxpayer dollars were wasted in the episode.</p><p>"We're now in a very different environment" with new IRS spending curbs, Faris Fink, a top deputy in the agency's small business division at the time, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Fink, who now heads that 24,000-employee division, said he believes many of the expenditures "should have been more closely scrutinized or not incurred at all and were not the best use of taxpayer dollars."</p><p>The mea culpa was echoed by new acting IRS chief Danny Werfel as the embattled agency struggled to contain public and congressional ire over its targeting of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status and its spending of $49 million on 225 employee conferences over the past three years.</p><p>Werfel called the 2010 gathering in Anaheim, Calif., "an unfortunate vestige from a prior era" and said IRS spending on travel and training has fallen 80 percent since then.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/irs_official_apologizes_for_lavish_spending_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/irs_official_apologizes_for_lavish_spending_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS: &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; parody video is &#8220;embarrassing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/irs_star_trek_parody_video_is_embarrassing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/irs_star_trek_parody_video_is_embarrassing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cupid shuffle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Faris Fink, better known to taxpayers as Spock, told Rep. Issa that the agency regrets making the clip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the American people continue to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/justice_department_to_investigate_irs_ap/">lose faith</a> in an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/must_see_morning_clip_president_obama_heard_about_irs_doj_scandals_from_the_news/">increasingly and disturbingly</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_nsa_has_all_your_info/">Orwellian</a> government, proceedings are underway for perhaps the only humorous scandal in the mix: the IRS's controversial conference spending, which produced a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/the_irs_spent_nearly_60000_in_tax_payer_funds_on_star_trek_parody_video/">"Star Trek" parody tape</a>, among other wonders.</p><p>House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif. asked IRS commissioner Faris Fink, better known to taxpayers as Spock, "What were you thinking?" regarding the creation of a nearly $50,000 "Star Trek" parody training video played at an IRS training conference in 2010. Fink said it was "an attempt, in a well-intentioned way, to use humor to open the conference.”</p><p>“The fact of the matter is that they’re embarrassing … they’re embarrassing and I regret the fact that they were made," he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/irs_star_trek_parody_video_is_embarrassing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/irs_star_trek_parody_video_is_embarrassing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California judge cites &#8220;Star Trek,&#8221; stuns copyright trolls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sci-fi-lover Otis Wright quoted Spock in his ruling against a group of lawyers laying claim to a single porn video]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a><br /> As someone who made a certain amount of my reputation by using the Star Trek universe to illustrate the <a href="http://www.peterfrase.com/2010/12/anti-star-trek-a-theory-of-posterity/">dangers</a> of strong intellectual property law, I feel obligated to comment on the recent <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/139843902/Prenda-Sanctions-Order">court decision</a> against the entity commonly referred to as Prenda Law. The case combines copyright battles, Star Trek, and pornography — if I can slip in a picture of a cute animal, I may be able to construct the Platonic ideal of a popular Internet post.</p><p>The case, decided in the District Court for the Central District of California, concerns a group of lawyers engaged in a particularly egregious form of copyright trolling. Their strategy was to file a large number of lawsuits accusing individuals of illegally downloading a single porn video, the copyright for which was apparently assigned to one of the lawyers’ groundskeeper on the basis of a forged signature. The basis for these lawsuits was quite flimsy, but the firm had no real intention of winning the lawsuits in court. Instead, they would offer to settle — and as the court decision notes, the offer was “for a sum calculated to be just below the cost of a bare-bones defense.” This, combined with the embarrassment of being publicly linked with downloading porn, was apparently enough to extort money from a significant number of people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damon Lindelof admits barely-clothed scene in &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; was &#8220;gratuitous&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damon lindelof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The producer and head writer "takes responsibility" for a scene in which actress Alice Eve randomly disrobes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you have not yet seen "Star Trek Into Darkness," you may have seen <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/benedict_cumberbatch_looks_very_evil_in_new_star_trek_trailer/">the trailer</a>, in which Starfleet science officer Doctor Carol Marcus, played by Alice Eve, strips down to her underwear before putting on a special torpedo-disarming outfit. The scene has puzzled some fans, prompting <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2013/may/21/star-trek-into-darkness-writer-underwear-scene">criticism</a> that it objectifies one of only two major female cast members.</p><p>In a recent interview, <a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1707650/star-trek-into-darkness-spoiler-special-burning-questions-answered.jhtml">MTV</a> asked producer Damon Lindelof about the scene:</p><blockquote><p>OK, down to the nitty gritty. I feel like I have to start with the biggest mystery/conversation that's surrounded the film from the get go. Why is Alice Eve in her underwear at one point? Oh and also, let's discuss your villain.</p></blockquote><p>Lindelof's response:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benedict Cumberbatch: I would marry Spock</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/benedict_cumberbatch_i_would_marry_spock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/benedict_cumberbatch_i_would_marry_spock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benedict cumberbatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zachary Quinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuck marry kill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The flustered star plays "F--k, Marry, Kill" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a red carpet event for last night's "Star Trek Into Darkness" debut, <a href="http://www.vh1.com/celebrity/2013-05-17/video-benedict-cumberbatch-zachary-quinto-play-fkmarrykill-star-trek-style/">VH1</a> asked stars Benedict Cumberbatch and Zachary Quinto to play "Fuck/Marry/Kill," a "game" that involves asking people who, out of their peer group, they'd hypothetically like to ... well ... have sex with, marry or kill. It's typically played by "cool" middle school kids in the back of a school bus, but it's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/cast_of_the_hobbit_gets_erotic/">way more fun to play with celebrities</a>.</p><p>"Wow, is this VH1?" asked Cumberbatch. "Wow, OK. Wow, OK," said a flustered Cumberbatch. "I can't believe this. I can't believe this." Reluctantly, the "Star Trek" villain admitted that out of his crew, he would marry Spock, because he'd be good at doing tax returns and math, and kill Chris Pine:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/benedict_cumberbatch_i_would_marry_spock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/benedict_cumberbatch_i_would_marry_spock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Star Trek Into Darkness&#8221;: Who made J.J. Abrams the sci-fi god?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/star_trek_into_darkness_who_made_j_j_abrams_the_sci_fi_god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/star_trek_into_darkness_who_made_j_j_abrams_the_sci_fi_god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek Into Darkness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zachary Quinto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoe Saldana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benedict cumberbatch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are the voyages of the -- oh, the hell with it! Let's blow some stuff up and chase a generic supervillain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently I missed the papal conclave. Not the one with Pope Francis and the Argentine torture scandals; I heard about that. I’m talking about the high-level secret meeting in the super-secret sub-orbital space fortress where <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/j_j_abrams‎">J.J. Abrams</a> was elected sole curator, conservator and monarch of three generations’ worth of nerdy pop culture history. Seriously, people, how does <em>one guy</em> end up in charge of both the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/star_trek">“Star Trek”</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/star_wars">“Star Wars”</a> reboots? Give me a break! Isn’t that kind of nuts and megalomaniacal and wrong and just too much of the same flavor of peppermint hazelnut chip ice cream from that one summer in Connecticut, when “Alligator Woman” was on the radio every single day? (We can discuss this another time, but if I could create a world in which <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/joss_whedon">Joss Whedon</a> had taken on “Star Trek,” and given Abrams the freakin’ <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_avengers">“Avengers,”</a> I’d do it in a heartbeat.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/star_trek_into_darkness_who_made_j_j_abrams_the_sci_fi_god/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/star_trek_into_darkness_who_made_j_j_abrams_the_sci_fi_god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>142</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.J. Abrams and Jon Stewart debate &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; versus &#8220;Star Wars&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/j_j_abrams_and_jon_stewart_debate_star_trek_versus_star_wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/j_j_abrams_and_jon_stewart_debate_star_trek_versus_star_wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The director also hands out pointers to the comedian and soon-to-be director]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a two-part interview on "The Daily Show," science fiction director J.J. Abrams and Jon Stewart debate the societal impact of "Star Wars" and "Star Trek." Abrams, who by directing both "Star Wars" and "Star Trek" movies has realized every nerd's dream, says "They are fundamentally different," calling "Star Wars" a "samurai movie western." But "I couldn't get into it," Abrams says as of "Star Trek." "The goal was to make a movie for movie-goers, not just for 'Star Trek' fans."</p><p>"The interesting thing to me was I stopped listening to when said you didn't like 'Star Trek.' I know you what happened cause your mouth was moving after that. So I'm assuming you apologized," joked Stewart.</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:426243" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-may-13-2013/exclusive---j-j--abrams-extended-interview-pt--1">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/j_j_abrams_and_jon_stewart_debate_star_trek_versus_star_wars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/j_j_abrams_and_jon_stewart_debate_star_trek_versus_star_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad day to be a porn lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prenda Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An angry judge -- and huge "Star Trek" fan -- blasts the sleazy Prenda Law firm into oblivion ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his <a href="http://ia601508.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.543744/gov.uscourts.cacd.543744.130.0.pdf">"Order Issuing Sanctions"</a> on a half-dozen sleazy lawyers who specialized in pornography copyright litigation, California District Judge Otis D. Wright II writes like a man expecting the entire Internet to go gaga over his every word.</p><p>The opening two paragraphs deserve reprinting in full:</p><blockquote><p>Plaintiffs have outmaneuvered the legal system. They’ve discovered the nexus of antiquated copyright laws, paralyzing social stigma, and unaffordable defense costs. And they exploit this anomaly by accusing individuals of illegally downloading a single pornographic video. Then they offer to settle -- for a sum calculated to be just below the cost of a bare-bones defense. For these individuals, resistance is futile; most reluctantly pay rather than have their names associated with illegally downloading porn. So now, copyright laws originally designed to compensate starving artists allow starving attorneys in this electronic-media era to plunder the citizenry.</p> <p>Plaintiffs do have a right to assert their intellectual-property rights, so long as they do it right. But Plaintiffs filing of cases using the same boilerplate complaint against dozens of defendants raised the Courts alert. It was when the Court realized Plaintiffs engaged their cloak of shell companies and fraud that the Court went to battlestations.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: Google Now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want the Star Trek computer, you're going to have to give your entire life over to the Starship Enterprise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like any good geek, I want my own <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/04/google_has_a_single_towering_obsession_it_wants_to_build_the_star_trek_computer.html">Star Trek computer</a>. You know, like the one that spoke with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majel_Barrett">Majel Barrett's</a> voice and was able to answer any question Captain Kirk or Picard might pose, in depth, and then <em>take action</em> as directed. Apple's Siri might be a step on the way there, but Siri, so far, at least, has some severe limitations. Like, I'm not really sure she truly <em>understands</em> me.</p><p>So I was delighted to hear the news this week that Google's "Siri-killer," Google Now, had finally been released for the iOS platform. Google has made it absolutely clear that one of the company's prime directives is to create a working Star Trek computer. Google seems as likely as anyone to get there first.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Star Trek&#8217;s&#8221; Wil Wheaton tells newborn girl why being a nerd &#8220;is awesome&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/star_treks_wil_wheaton_tells_newborn_girl_why_being_a_nerd_is_awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/star_treks_wil_wheaton_tells_newborn_girl_why_being_a_nerd_is_awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wil wheaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An audience member asked the actor to record an inspirational video for her infant daughter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a panel at the Calgary Comic &amp; Entertainment Expo on April 27, "Star Trek" and "Big Bang Theory" actor Wil Wheaton fielded a question from an audience member, who asked him to explain to her newborn daughter "why it's awesome to be a nerd." Wheaton launched into nearly four-minute speech on growing up feeling like "there was something wrong" and then realizing, as an adult, that being a nerd is something to be valued.</p><p>It's "not about what you love -- it's about how you love it" and "finding other people who love it the way you do" is the defining characteristic of "why being a nerd is awesome," said Wheaton.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/H_BtmV4JRSc" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/star_treks_wil_wheaton_tells_newborn_girl_why_being_a_nerd_is_awesome/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/star_treks_wil_wheaton_tells_newborn_girl_why_being_a_nerd_is_awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous gives Westboro Baptist a makeover</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/anonymous_gives_westboro_baptist_a_makeover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/anonymous_gives_westboro_baptist_a_makeover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george takei]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonymous started a Facebook page for the hate group, and "Star Trek" star George Takei helped spread the word]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what was first believed to be a hack but was later revealed to be a hoax, hacker collective Anonymous created a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Westboro-Baptist-Church/400347320041300" target="_blank">faux-official Facebook page</a> for hate group Westboro Baptist Church.</p><p>In place of Westboro's standard issue rainbow-colored "God hates fags" signs, the Facebook page featured quotes from Martin Luther King Jr. and the Dalai Lama, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=456009561141742&amp;set=pb.400347320041300.-2207520000.1366288071.&amp;type=3&amp;src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ash3%2F554983_456009561141742_559240184_n.jpg&amp;size=460%2C390" target="_blank">cute pictures of animals</a> captioned in LOL speak and <a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=456461597763205&amp;set=pb.400347320041300.-2207520000.1366288071.&amp;type=3&amp;src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-prn1%2F11810_456461597763205_1014860_n.png&amp;size=617%2C253" target="_blank">nerd culture ephemera</a>, like a "Star Trek" meme that caught the attention of Hikaru Sulu himself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/anonymous_gives_westboro_baptist_a_makeover/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/anonymous_gives_westboro_baptist_a_makeover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The IRS spent nearly $60,000 in taxpayer funds on &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; parody video</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/the_irs_spent_nearly_60000_in_tax_payer_funds_on_star_trek_parody_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/the_irs_spent_nearly_60000_in_tax_payer_funds_on_star_trek_parody_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax payers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gilligan's island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The agency has since apologized, saying, "A video of this type would not be made today"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2010, the IRS boldly went "where no government employee has gone before" when it produced a six-minute "Star Trek" parody video, designed to train IRS employees about <del>how to act in B<del datetime="2013-03-25T18:19:44+00:00">-rated comedy</del></del><del datetime="2013-03-25T18:19:44+00:00">  </del>leadership.</p><p>It begins with the following monologue:</p><blockquote><p>"Space: the final frontier<br /> These are the voyagers of the Starship Enterprise Y<br /> Its never-ending mission is to seek out new tax forms<br /> To explore strange new regulations<br /> To boldly go where no government employee has gone before."</p></blockquote><p>The video, which features affectless government employees doubling as fist-bumping crew members headed toward planet Notax, is hilarious and jarring and so bad that it's good until you realize that the government agency paid for the video, along with another spoof of "Gilligan's Island," with $60,000 in taxpayer funds for production alone. And then, it's angering.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57575927/taxpayer-money-finances-irs-star-trek-parody/">CBS</a>, who first obtained the video:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/the_irs_spent_nearly_60000_in_tax_payer_funds_on_star_trek_parody_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/the_irs_spent_nearly_60000_in_tax_payer_funds_on_star_trek_parody_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.J. Abrams on &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; vs. &#8220;Star Trek&#8221;: &#8220;The worlds could not be more different&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/j_j_abrams_on_star_wars_vs_star_trek_the_worlds_could_not_be_more_different/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/j_j_abrams_on_star_wars_vs_star_trek_the_worlds_could_not_be_more_different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[episode 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the director shifts focus to his next sci-fi project, he admits that he was "never a 'Star Trek' fan" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that legendary sci-fi director J.J. Abrams, along with stars of the franchise's original cast, has joined Disney's continuation of the "Star Wars" franchise, fans are getting hints of the direction Episode 7 is headed in. And there's more to come as Abrams, whose "Star Trek Into Darkness" comes out this spring, is shifting focus to the Disney project.</p><p>He recently told <a href="http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=36884">Empire</a> that his expectations for the project are high:</p><blockquote><p>"There are infinitely more questions than answers right now, but to me, they’re [the two films] not that dissimilar. Though I came at these both from very different places, where they both meet is a place of ‘Ooh, that’s really exciting.’ And even though I was never a 'Star Trek' fan, I felt like there was a version of it that would make me excited, that I would think ‘that’s cool, that feels right, I actually would want to see that."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/j_j_abrams_on_star_wars_vs_star_trek_the_worlds_could_not_be_more_different/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/j_j_abrams_on_star_wars_vs_star_trek_the_worlds_could_not_be_more_different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benedict Cumberbatch looks very evil in new &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; trailer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/benedict_cumberbatch_looks_very_evil_in_new_star_trek_trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/benedict_cumberbatch_looks_very_evil_in_new_star_trek_trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benedict cumberbatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trailers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new trailer gives the first glimpse into the "Sherlock" actor's villainous role]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new "Star Trek Into Darkness" trailer has been released, and this one is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/star_trek_into_darkness_trailer_released/">less "Inception"-y</a>, giving a better idea of just how evil Benedict Cumberbatch's villain will be in the upcoming J.J. Abrams movie. (Hint: pretty evil).</p><p><a href="http://trekmovie.com/2013/03/21/new-star-trek-into-darkness-poster-unveiled-through-hidden-url-in-international-teaser/">Eagle-eyed observers</a> will note that the trailer has an easter egg that links to this movie poster:</p><div class="mceTemp"> <dl id="attachment_13248297" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 212px;"> <dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/benedict_cumberbatch_looks_very_evil_in_new_star_trek_trailer/poster2g_2/" rel="attachment wp-att-13248297"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/poster2g1-202x300.jpg" alt="" title="poster2g" class="size-medium wp-image-13248297" height="300" width="202" /></a></dt> <dd class="wp-caption-dd"></dd> </dl> </div><p>Watch the trailer (and look for the link) below:<br /> <iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yhz4A5BCMAA" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/benedict_cumberbatch_looks_very_evil_in_new_star_trek_trailer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/benedict_cumberbatch_looks_very_evil_in_new_star_trek_trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite &#8220;Jedi&#8221; flap, Obama still has nerd cred</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/slideshow_obama_u_nerd_ed_states_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/slideshow_obama_u_nerd_ed_states_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13216270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Jedi mind meld" mix-ups aside, Obama is still a pretty big geek]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a press conference Friday, President Obama outraged nerds everywhere when he mixed up his "Star Trek" and "Star Wars" references and referred to a "Jedi mind meld." The comment quickly took hold of the Internet (and spawned the hashtag <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23ObamaSciFiQuotes&amp;src=hash">#ObamaSciFiQuotes</a>). Even the White House riffed on the mix-up with a tweet that (probably) intentionally confused the two franchises again:</p><p>[embedtweet id="307584535976112128"]</p><p>Despite this, Obama has pretty strong nerd cred. Here's a look back at the best of those moments:</p><p>[slide_show id=13216194]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/slideshow_obama_u_nerd_ed_states_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/slideshow_obama_u_nerd_ed_states_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slideshow: Nerd Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/slideshow_nerd_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/slideshow_nerd_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13216194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the outcry about "Jedi mind meld," Obama has pretty strong nerd cred]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Despite the outcry about "Jedi mind meld," Obama has pretty strong nerd cred]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/slideshow_nerd_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Jedi mind meld&#8221; mixes up &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; and &#8220;Star Wars&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/obamas_jedi_mind_meld_mixes_up_star_trek_and_star_wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/obamas_jedi_mind_meld_mixes_up_star_trek_and_star_wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jedi mind meld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jedi mind tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind meld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's analogy to "Star Trek" and "Star Wars" has sci-fi fans befuddled]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his press conference today, President Obama said he was unable to perform a "Jedi mind meld" with Republicans in Congress in order to convince them that they ought to trim spending and avert the sequester. However, the president -- with much else on his mind -- has conflated two sci-fi franchises.</p><p>In the "Star Wars" films, a "Jedi mind trick" is a way of using hypnosis -- perhaps accompanied by a subtle hand gesture -- in order to convince someone of something contrary to fact. Most famously, Obi-Wan Kenobi convinces Darth Vader's stormtroopers, about to steal C-3PO and R2D2, that the two fleeing robots "aren't the droids you're looking for."</p><p>A "mind meld," in "Star Trek," is performed by Vulcans in order to convey history, thoughts and information, as well as to learn about the subject's motivations. In "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home," Spock <a href="http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Vulcan_mind_meld">mind-melds with two humpback whales</a> in order to tell them that the passengers of the "Enterprise" wanted to help them save Earth.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/obamas_jedi_mind_meld_mixes_up_star_trek_and_star_wars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/obamas_jedi_mind_meld_mixes_up_star_trek_and_star_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Captain Kirk takes on the Reddit trolls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/william_shatner_takes_on_the_reddit_trolls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/william_shatner_takes_on_the_reddit_trolls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Shatner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hate Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13198575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ William Shatner makes a bold plea for Internet civility]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People of the Internet, your nerd lord is displeased. James T. Kirk himself, the man who, at 81, is still in the game enough to have <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner">a vibrant Twitter presence</a> and his own app, would like you to know he's pretty grossed out by what goes down on Reddit.</p><p>In January, <a href="http://www.reddit.com/user/williamshatner">William Shatner joined Reddit</a>, and soon after posted a fairly innocuous question about turning off private messaging, the better to filter out those <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/ideasfortheadmins/comments/18536m/turning_off_private_messages/ ">"I can choose to ignore."</a> What followed has been a lively and often contentious conversation about the nature of Reddit itself, and the line between freedom of expression and being a plain old jackass.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/william_shatner_takes_on_the_reddit_trolls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/william_shatner_takes_on_the_reddit_trolls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.J. Abrams to direct next &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; movie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/j_j_abrams_to_direct_next_star_wars_movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/j_j_abrams_to_direct_next_star_wars_movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star wars 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13181230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Star Trek" director is about to cross into another nerd universe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/guillermo_del_toro_will_not_direct_star_wars_vii/">search for the next "Star Wars" director</a> is over. <a href="http://www.thewrap.com/movies/article/jj-abrams-set-direct-next-star-wars-film-exclusive-74596">TheWrap reports</a> that sci-fi director J.J. Abrams will take on Disney's highly publicized, highly controversial project, "Star Wars: Episode VII." And an insider has confirmed the news with <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/j-j-abrams-to-direct-new-star-wars-movie-for-disney/">Deadline</a> as well, saying, "It's a done deal with J.J."</p><p>The news comes as a surprise, especially since Abrams was one of the first directors to announce he would pass on the role -- and because he already has an allegiance to rival nerd franchise, "Star Trek." He told Empire Magazine:</p><blockquote><p>“There were the very early conversations and I quickly said that because of my loyalty to ‘Star Trek’, and also just being a [‘Star Wars’] fan, I wouldn’t even want to be involved in the next version of those things.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/j_j_abrams_to_direct_next_star_wars_movie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/j_j_abrams_to_direct_next_star_wars_movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
