<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Steve King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/steve_king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration: The latest watered-down compromise GOP hates anyway</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New proposal will do little to fix our broken system, and passing it will cost Obama real capital. Sound familiar?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The road to citizenship isn’t exactly shovel ready. In fact, even calling it a road might be a stretch. It’s more like a long on-ramp. With a tollbooth. And potholes. And a guard station. And a giant electrified fence.</p><p>In their desire to find a compromise acceptable to the chronically short-sighted and self-destructive Republican Party, Democrats have crafted an immigration bill that is for the most part as unobjectionable as it is uninspired. The bill cobbles together a series of pragmatic concessions that, while perhaps sufficient to overcome conservative objections, will likely prove wholly insufficient at actually addressing the problem it was designed to solve — that is, fixing our broken immigration system. The tangle of hurdles and exclusions, loopholes for businesses and pitfalls for immigrants, is precisely the mess we should be cleaning up, not making worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Steve King calls immigration bill &#8220;outrageous amnesty&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/rep_steve_king_calls_immigration_bill_outrageous_amnesty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/rep_steve_king_calls_immigration_bill_outrageous_amnesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He also called it "aggressive" and destructive to the rule of law]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Steve King (R.-Iowa), who's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/rep_steve_king_immigrants_like_dogs/">best</a> known of anti-immigrant diatribes, that he apparently thinks are <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/21/steve-king-immigrants-dogs_n_1998007.html">cute</a>, released a statement on the most viable immigration bill currently under consideration in the Senate:</p><blockquote><p>The Gang of Eight's bill is aggressive and outrageous amnesty," said King. "It is instant legalization of all illegal immigrants in the United States, with very few exceptions. It contains only promises: the promise of a plan for border security, of a backup plan for the border security, and of workplace enforcement in the form of making E-Verify mandatory. What makes anyone think President Obama would enforce any future immigration laws when he has violated his own oath of office to take care that the laws be 'faithfully executed'?</p> <p>I expected this from Democrats...It is the Republicans who should know better. Republicans who support this bill have effectively said to Americans, 'we are prepared to sacrifice the Rule of Law on the altar of misguided and erroneous political expediency'.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/rep_steve_king_calls_immigration_bill_outrageous_amnesty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/rep_steve_king_calls_immigration_bill_outrageous_amnesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve King: Boston attacks should slow down immigration reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_king_boston_attacks_should_slow_down_immigration_reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_king_boston_attacks_should_slow_down_immigration_reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We need to take a look at the big picture," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolling with the New York Post's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/after_boston_explosions_a_right_wing_scapegoat_emerges/">thin report</a> that police had questioned a Saudi national over the explosions in Boston, Rep. Steve King argued that the U.S. should seriously consider slowing down immigration reform in light of the attacks.</p><p>“Some of the speculation that has come out is that yes, it was a foreign national and, speculating here, that it was potentially a person on a student visa,” King, R-Iowa, told the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/345691/after-boston-congressman-urges-caution-immigration">National Review</a>'s Robert Costa. “If that’s the case, then we need to take a look at the big picture.”</p><p>“We need to be ever vigilant,” King continued. “We need to go far deeper into our border crossings. . . .We need to take a look at the visa-waiver program and wonder what we’re doing. If we can’t background check people that are coming from Saudi Arabia, how do we think we are going to background check the 11 to 20 million people that are here from who knows where.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_king_boston_attacks_should_slow_down_immigration_reform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/steve_king_boston_attacks_should_slow_down_immigration_reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laguardia Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Richard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Richard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krystle M. Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pressure cooker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LIVEBLOG: Stock markets gain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated: </strong>5:01 p.m.</p><p>The organizing body pledges to run the maration next year. Here's the complete statement from Thomas Grilk, Executive Director of the Boston Athletic Association.</p><blockquote><p>The Boston Athletic Association (B.A.A.) extends its deepest sympathies to all those who were affected by Monday's tragic events. Those who lost their lives and were injured are in our thoughts and prayers.</p> <p>It is a sad day for the City of Boston, for the running community, and for all those who were here to enjoy the 117th running of the Boston Marathon. What was intended to be a day of joy and celebration quickly became a day in which running a marathon was of little importance.</p> <p>We want to express our deepest gratitude to all of the B.A.A. medical personnel and volunteers and the City of Boston’s first responders who reacted so courageously to help save lives. Special thanks to the loyal Boston Marathon community – over 8500 volunteers, 1000 medical personnel, the organizing committee, and hundreds of thousands along the race route – who make the experience what it is for all our runners, who are hurting today.</p> <p>We would like to thank the countless people from around the world who have reached out to support us over the last 24 hours.</p> <p>We are cooperating with the City of Boston, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and all federal law enforcement officials in the investigation and the effort to bring those responsible for this tragedy to justice, so we are limited in what information we can provide.</p> <p>Boston is strong. Boston is resilient. Boston is our home. And Boston has made us enormously proud in the past 24 hours. The Boston Marathon is a deeply held tradition – an integral part of the fabric and history of our community. We are committed to continuing that tradition with the running of the 118th Boston Marathon in 2014.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Rand Paul kill conservative opposition to immigration reform?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/did_rand_paul_kill_conservative_opposition_to_immigration_reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/did_rand_paul_kill_conservative_opposition_to_immigration_reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While things look pretty good now, there is still plenty of time for a backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul has some sort of magic touch, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/03/entire-room-of-tea-party-house-members-agrees-with-rand-paul-on-immigration.php?ref=fpblg">according to TPM's Benjy Sarlin</a>, as his immigration reform turnaround apparently convinced a roomful of the sort of Republicans who refer to immigrants as "animals" that allowing many of them to seek citizenship wouldn't necessarily be a horrible idea.</p><p>Earlier this year <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/three_reasons_to_be_skeptical_that_immigration_reform_will_pass/">I told everyone to be skeptical that immigration reform would pass</a>, and one of the reasons I cited was the I thought rather obvious fact that House Republicans didn't support it. Now Rand Paul nearly has me convinced it could pass the House with more Republican than Democratic support.</p><p>Paul's primary argument was to convince very conservative politicians that they could <em>get away</em> with supporting immigration reform, even though the president wants it and many conservative voters don't. The strategy is to just use different words, basically.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/did_rand_paul_kill_conservative_opposition_to_immigration_reform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/did_rand_paul_kill_conservative_opposition_to_immigration_reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve King at CPAC quietly challenges Rove</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I'm still here standing," King said of the last election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his speech to CPAC, Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, touted his win in the 2012 elections despite his super conservative platform, in what was likely a quiet challenge to Karl Rove, whose Super PAC has indicated that it will target King if he decides to run for Senate.</p><p>" I didn't run on jobs and the economy," King told CPAC, adding that he "stood on life and stood on marriage," unlike some of his colleagues in the House. "A bunch of people who have backed away from these challenges don't realize that I'm still here standing."</p><p>"Our job is to step up and defend our values and the full spectrum of constitutional conservatism," he said.</p><p>King is thinking about a run in 2014 to replace retiring Sen. Tom Harkin.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/steve_king_at_cpac_quietly_challenges_rove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve King at CPAC: No universal background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/steve_king_at_cpac_no_universal_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/steve_king_at_cpac_no_universal_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as a law would prevent him from handing down his grandmother's gun, King said he'd be opposed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, was asked at CPAC whether he would support a law to implement universal background checks and close the gun show loophole. King replied that he opposes it as long as it would prevent him from giving his grandson a gun at Christmas.</p><p>"When somebody writes a background check law that doesn't prohibit me from giving my grandmother's .410, that she shot [chickens] with, to my grandson at the Christmas tree in my house without" getting the federal government involved, "then I'll take another look at it and perhaps have another opinion. Meanwhile, I don't want them to interrupt Christmas at the Kings'."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/steve_king_at_cpac_no_universal_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/steve_king_at_cpac_no_universal_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman: Karl Rove&#8217;s attacks are &#8220;a fool&#8217;s game&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["These biologically stupid things that people say" are the problem, he said, not the GOP platform [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update - March 11, 8:33 a.m.:</strong> RNC spokesman Sean Spicer clarified to Salon that Preibus was not referring to Rove's effort, but rather that engaging in such an effort would be "a fool's game" for the RNC.</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said that Karl Rove's plan to target far-right conservatives in the primaries, like potential Iowa Senate candidate Rep. Steve King, is "a fool's game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p>“Listen, I don’t think our platform is the issue,” Priebus said, <a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/2013/03/07/rnc-chair-says-roves-planned-attack-on-king-a-fools-game-audio/">Radio Iowa</a> reports. “I think a lot of times it’s some of these biologically stupid things that people say, you know, that I believe caused a lot of the problems.”</p><p>He continued: "Personally, as an RNC [Chair], I don’t believe in that. I don’t believe the party should pick winners and losers in primaries and I think it’s, historically, if you look at it, it’s a bit of a fool’s game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPers boast about VAWA after voting against it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/house_gopers_boast_about_vawa_after_voting_against_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/house_gopers_boast_about_vawa_after_voting_against_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vicky Hartzler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Murphy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I know how important it is to empower women in difficult situations,” said Rep. Steve King]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans who voted against the final version of the Violence Against Women Act have been sending statements to their constituents boasting about their votes...for the Violence Against Women Act.</p><p>"I supported this legislation because I know how important it is to empower women in difficult situations,” Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, <a href="http://steveking.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=4525&amp;Itemid=300099">said</a> in a statement. “If a woman is at risk, she should know that she has a place to turn for support and assistance. I supported VAWA in 2005, 2012, and today I voted in support of the House version to see that victims of domestic violence and sexual assault have access to the resources and protection when they need it the most.”</p><p>“I am pleased to support efforts to protect all women in this country from domestic abuse and other forms of violence,” said Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Mo.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/house_gopers_boast_about_vawa_after_voting_against_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/house_gopers_boast_about_vawa_after_voting_against_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The next Todd Akin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/the_next_todd_akin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/the_next_todd_akin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The field clears for Tea Party Rep. Steve King to be the likely GOP nominee for Iowa Senate in '14]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iowa Republican Rep. Tom Latham said yesterday that he won’t run for the Senate seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Tom Harkin, <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/27/17119949-iowa-republican-passes-on-senate-bid-clearing-way-for-conservative-steve-king?lite">paving the way</a> for one of liberals’ favorite villains to run for the seat: Rep. Steve King.</p><p>King hasn’t announced yet, but has said he’s <a href="http://theiowarepublican.com/2013/steve-king-leaning-toward-a-u-s-senate-run/">leaning toward a run</a>. It’s enough to concern Steve Law, the president of the Karl Rove-affiliated American Crossroads, which has made it its mission to help non-Tea Party Republicans win GOP primaries. "We're concerned about Steve King's Todd Akin problem," Law told the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/us/politics/top-gop-donors-seek-greater-say-in-senate-races.html">New York Times</a>. "This is an example of candidate discipline and how it would play in a general election. All of the things he's said are going to be hung around his neck."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/the_next_todd_akin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/the_next_todd_akin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie is no moderate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/chris_christies_premature_obituary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/chris_christies_premature_obituary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't believe the hype. Despite a CPAC snub and hostility from conservatives, Chris Christie is a true right-winger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Christie’s reputation as a moderate – even by the standards of today’s Republican Party – is vastly overrated. This is a key point to keep in mind this week, with the news that organizers of the Conservative Political Action Conference have<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/al-cardenas-defends-chris-christie-cpac-snub-88162.html"> snubbed</a> the New Jersey governor.</p><p>The official explanation from Al Cardenas, the conference’s chief organizer: “CPAC is like the all-star game for professional athletes; you get invited when you have had an outstanding year.” Christie, <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/al-cardenas-defends-chris-christie-cpac-snub-88162.html">apparently thanks to his loud public criticism</a> of House Republicans when they delayed passage of a Sandy relief package, was deemed to have had a sub-par year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/chris_christies_premature_obituary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/chris_christies_premature_obituary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ghosts of the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tea_party_exile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tea_party_exile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The movement's most popular leaders from a 2010 poll have all either lost their jobs -- or fled ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the names that come to mind when you think about leaders of the Tea Party movement? Maybe Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Jim DeMint, Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann? Those were the most popular leaders listed by self-identified Tea Party activists in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/tea-party-canvass/">a 2010 Washington Post poll</a>, at the height of the movement. You could add to that list a handful of other congressmen, especially outspoken Reps. Steve King, Allen West and Joe Walsh, among others.</p><p>And then you’d realize that every single one of them either lost their job or abandoned being a voice of the movement.</p><p>The 2012 election was devastating for the outspoken leaders in Congress. Allen West lost after a protracted battle, Joe Walsh was trounced by rising star Tammy Duckworth, and Ron Paul retired. Other, lesser-known members like Roscoe Barlett also lost. The two House Tea Party Caucus members who ran for the Senate last year both lost -- Reps. Denny Rehberg in Montana and Todd Akin in Missouri.</p><p>Meanwhile Jim DeMint, the most prominent Tea Party leader in the Senate, who funded primary challenges against more moderate Republicans,<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/"> left the Senate</a> a month after the election to head the Heritage Foundation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tea_party_exile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/tea_party_exile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The wisdom of &#8230; Newt Gingrich?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/the_wisdom_of_newt_gingrich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/the_wisdom_of_newt_gingrich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Branstad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Laughlin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His warnings about the futility of Karl Rove's newest project prove that even a broken clock is right twice a day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich’s rhetorical tics are well-known – his fondness for the word “frankly,” his eagerness to frame even the most mundane development in dramatic world-historical terms, and his eagerness to accuse his enemies of practicing “machine” politics.</p><p>So it’s tempting to dismiss the broadside he leveled against Karl Rove and his Conservative Victory Project earlier this week as typical Gingrich grandstanding. And to a degree, that’s all it is. In a <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/2013/02/20/gingrich-why-karl-rove-is-just-plain-wrong/">Human Events Op-Ed</a>, the former House speaker and failed 2012 White House candidate accused Rove of employing “the system of Tammany Hall and the Chicago machine.” Anyone who’s been following Gingrich for a while is surely familiar with this line of attack; here, for example, <a href="http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/BudgetReconciliationLegislation159">he is</a> in the summer of 1993 castigating Bill Clinton and “the Democratic machine” for forcing a tax hike bill through the House (a bill that ended up <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/republicans_deficit_taxes/">playing no small role</a> in the balanced budgets of the late ‘90s – but that’s a story for another day).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/the_wisdom_of_newt_gingrich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/the_wisdom_of_newt_gingrich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More battle lines drawn in Rove vs. Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/more_battle_lines_drawn_in_rove_vs_tea_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/more_battle_lines_drawn_in_rove_vs_tea_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13198994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party Patriots have launched a super PAC and are tying themselves to Steve King in Iowa ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Armed with a new super PAC, the Tea Party Patriots are lining up behind a potential Senate run by Rep. Steve King, in response to an American Crossroads initiative to crush super-conservative candidates.</p><p>King, R-Iowa, invited the group's co-founder Jenny Beth Martin to be his guest at the State of the Union on Tuesday. And, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/282535-tea-party-leader-to-join-rep-king-at-state-of-the-union">the Hill reports</a>, "an official familiar with the plans of the new TPP super-PAC, Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, says the group is looking to engage in the upcoming Iowa Senate race in favor of King."</p><p>Though King has not officially announced a run yet, he is an early front-runner in the race to replace retiring Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, in 2014.</p><p>The TPP super PAC was launched earlier this week  as a counterweight to the Conservative Victory Fund, an effort by the Karl Rove-backed American Crossroads to enlist GOP mega-donors to help ensure that candidates like Todd Akin or King don't make it through the primaries.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/more_battle_lines_drawn_in_rove_vs_tea_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/more_battle_lines_drawn_in_rove_vs_tea_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve King: Karl Rove can&#8217;t &#8220;bully me&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/steve_king_karl_rove_cant_bully_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/steve_king_karl_rove_cant_bully_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Iowa congressman says he won't be strong-armed out of a Senate run by American Crossroads]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative Rep. Steve King is using Karl Rove's "war" on the Tea Party to fundraise, telling supporters that "Nobody can bully me out of running for the U.S. Senate, not even Karl Rove and his hefty war chest.”</p><p>King is a potential front-runner in the 2014 Republican primary to replace Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, who is retiring. In an <a href="http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2013/02/07/congressman-king-help-me-fight-karl-roves-crusade-against-me/article?nclick_check=1">email</a> obtained by the Des Moines Register, King told supporters that "I’m under attack and I urgently need your help to fight back." He added that he has not made a decision about a run, "but already Karl Rove and his army have launched a crusade against me."</p><p>"I’m no stranger to outlandish attacks like this," King wrote. "They said I couldn’t win in 2012 — the entire political machine was against me — but I soundly defeated my opponent by 8 percentage points. So let me be clear. Nobody can bully me out of running for the U.S. Senate, not even Karl Rove and his hefty war chest."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/steve_king_karl_rove_cant_bully_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/steve_king_karl_rove_cant_bully_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the GOP suicide club still active?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/is_the_gop_suicide_club_still_active/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/is_the_gop_suicide_club_still_active/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Braley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Begich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Harkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some surprise Senate retirement announcements will test whether the party has learned anything from 2010 and 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news was good for Republicans over the weekend when <a href="http://atr.rollcall.com/iowa-tom-harkin-to-retire-in-2014/">Tom Harkin announced</a> that he wouldn’t seek a sixth term in the U.S. Senate. The 73-year-old legislator, who was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/24/tom-harkin-filibuster-reform_n_2544153.html">bitterly disappointed</a> by the hollow filibuster reform compromise Senate leaders reached last week, would have been a strong bet to win reelection in 2014. But in an open seat contest in the Hawkeye State, Republicans have a real chance at scoring a pickup.</p><p>The GOP’s magic number is six: Post a net gain of a half-dozen seats and control of the upper chamber will be theirs for the first time since 2006. This is actually a much weaker position than the party should be in, given the strong hands it was dealt in the 2010 and 2012 elections.</p><p>In each of those cycles, the GOP squandered several winnable races by nominating deeply flawed, polarizing candidates. Without Christine O’Donnell, Sharron Angle, Ken Buck, Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, the party might today control the Senate; not only did those candidates lose races that generic Republican nominees would have won, the publicity they generated with their fringe antics helped poison the party brand and hurt Republican candidates elsewhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/is_the_gop_suicide_club_still_active/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/is_the_gop_suicide_club_still_active/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storm aid&#8217;s not for &#8220;Gucci bags&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/steve_king_federal_hurricane_aid_should_not_be_for_gucci_bags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/steve_king_federal_hurricane_aid_should_not_be_for_gucci_bags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13058503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iowa congressman Steve King doubles down on his push for restrictions on federal disaster funds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a debate Tuesday night, Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said that he thinks states should draw up detailed plans for how they will spend federal disaster aid, so that it's not spent on "Gucci bags and massage parlors."</p><p>“I want to get them the resources that are necessary to lift them out of this water and this sand and the ashes and the death that’s over there in the East Coast and especially the Northeast,” King said, <a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/2012/10/31/king-vilsack-debate-federal-aid-for-hurricane-sandy/">Radio Iowa</a> reports. “But they need to come with a plan on how to spend it.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/steve_king_federal_hurricane_aid_should_not_be_for_gucci_bags/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/steve_king_federal_hurricane_aid_should_not_be_for_gucci_bags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve King didn&#8217;t build that</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party darling built his construction business with a lot of help from government contracts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a clear day in mid-August this year, Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King, who faces one of the toughest reelection bids of his career, mounted a stage at the State Fair and recounted a story about how he had an epiphany, one day in the mid 1970s, when he was an indebted newlywed: “I came back home that day and I said ... Nobody's going to take care of us. Nobody's going to offer me that magnificent job. We’re going to have to earn it ... Three months later I started a business.” It’s a classic American story of self-reliance, and King added a uniquely Republican punch line: “<a href="http://youtu.be/U_bnJMR-mRI">And I didn’t realize that if I did that, I didn’t build that!</a>” This was, of course, a clumsy quip on the (taken-out-of-context) Obama quote that would become the theme of the Republican National Convention and a symbol of everything the GOP stood for -- building private industry without any help from the government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fourteen most extreme candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/fourteen_most_extremist_candidates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/fourteen_most_extremist_candidates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extremism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgil Goode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann has company. A who's who of the hard-right currently running for office]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" align="left" /></a> <em>It’s well known that in recent years, this country has seen its electoral politics polarized to an extent that has only rarely been paralleled in American history. But that polarization in many cases goes far beyond anything resembling mainstream discourse, extending to men and women who are linked to hate groups and racial, ethnic, religious, anti-gay and antigovernment extremism, or who promote extremist propaganda. Their baseless claims typically include demonizing propaganda about certain minority groups, or conspiracy theories that have the same demonizing subtext. What follows is a look at 15 political candidates, including Democrats, Republicans, independents and members of extremist political parties, who are running for office this fall or ran earlier in the year. Research on these candidates was carried out by the SPLC Task Force on Hate in the Public Sphere.</em></p><p><strong>Virgil Goode Jr. (Va.)</strong></p><p><strong>Office sought: President of the United States</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/fourteen_most_extremist_candidates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/fourteen_most_extremist_candidates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Rivard, rape apologist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/roger_rivard_rape_apologist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/roger_rivard_rape_apologist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Rivard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wisconsin legislator's remarks are further proof that the right needs a lesson on the true meaning of "rape" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were hoping to wake up one morning and not have to unlock some new, yet unplumbed level of disgust within the core of your being for our conservative friends, sorry, but today's not looking so good. Ladies and gentlemen, grab your antiemetics, position your face in your palm, and say <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/wisconsin_goper_some_girls_rape_easy/">hello to Roger Rivard.</a></p><p>Back in December, the Wisconsin state representative had a few thoughts about a <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/134692573.html">controversial high school sexual assault case</a> and the questions about whether the 14-year-old girl at the center of it had in fact consented to sex. At the time, he dryly observed to the Chetek Alert that "If it's rape, it's rape. If it's not, it's not," adding that his father long ago warned him: "Some girls rape easy." Because apparently the Rivard men are as enlightened about sexual assault as they are about grammar.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/roger_rivard_rape_apologist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/roger_rivard_rape_apologist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>