<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > stop-and-frisk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/stop_and_frisk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD&#8217;s Ray Kelly: Blacks &#8220;understopped&#8221; by police</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In line with Mayor Bloomberg, Ray Kelly defends the NYPD's racially skewed, controversial stop-and-frisk practices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Echoing what Joan Walsh called Mayor Bloomberg's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">"ugly" defense </a>of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practice, police commissioner Ray Kelly asserted Wednesday night that African Americans are "understopped" by police. During an <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/nypds-stop-frisk-racial-profiling-proactive-policing-19088868">interview with ABC</a>, the commissioner and the policing tactic's greatest defender, said that "African Americans are being understopped in relation to people being described as perpetrators of violent crime."</p><p>While Mayor Bloomberg has been mayor, the NYPD has carried out over<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/"> 5 million stop-and-frisks.</a> Analysis by the ACLU of official police data found that over 86 percent of the stops were of black or Latino individuals. The analysis of police data also revealed that 88 percent of the stops did not result in an arrest or summons (and of course an even smaller proportion ever lead to a prosecution, or conviction). The number of innocent people stopped alone serves as ample riposte to Kelly's suggestion that any demographic is "understopped."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Bloomberg&#8217;s ugly &#8220;stop and frisk&#8221; freakout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He equates the NYCLU with the NRA, race-baits the New York Times and lets the NYPD profile blacks and Muslims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/mayor_bloomberg_on_mosque/">One of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s finest moments</a>, at least until his recent all-out advocacy for gun control, was when he choked up during a moving speech defending the development of the so-called Ground Zero Mosque in 2010. Remember that? Republicans were making it a big campaign issue, even President Obama took his time before kinda-sorta defending it, but Bloomberg made a big speech in front of the Statue of Liberty and defended the fundamental American right of New York Muslims to build a community center where they wanted it.</p><blockquote><p>This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions or favor one over another. The World Trade Center site will forever hold a special place in our city, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans if we said no to a mosque in lower Manhattan.</p> <p>Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11, and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values and play into our enemies’ hands if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists, and we should not stand for that.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vast majority of New Yorkers want more NYPD oversight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quinnipiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New poll finds support for inspector general position particularly high among black and Latino voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new Quinnipiac University poll <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/new-york-city/release-detail?ReleaseID=1880">has found</a> that a vast majority of New York voters support the establishment of an independent inspector general to monitor the NYPD. In light of an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/">ongoing landmark federal lawsuit </a>(and growing public outcry) over the police department's use of stop-and-frisk tactics that disproportionately target and harass young black and Latino men in New York, calls for greater oversight have amplified in recent months. Via Quinnipiac:</p><blockquote><p>New York City voters, by a substantial 66 - 25 percent margin, support creating the position of inspector general to independently monitor the Police Department... Support ranges from 53 - 38 percent among white voters to 77 - 13 percent among Hispanic voters and 78 - 13 percent among black voters, the independent Quinnipiac University poll finds... Support is 51 - 42 percent among Republicans and 55 - 35 percent among voters over 55 years old. Voters in every other political, gender, age and income groups support the NYPD inspector general idea by 60 percent or more.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD&#8217;s Ray Kelly wanted to &#8220;instill fear&#8221; in minority youth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The testimony of a New York state senator in landmark trial reveals the commissioner's stop-and-frisk intentions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest striking revelation about the internal mechanisms of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practices, a New York state senator testified that police commissioner Ray Kelly once said he intended to "instill fear" in black and Latino young men with the controversial tactic.</p><p>State Sen. Eric Adams, a retired NYPD captain, took the stand Monday in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">the landmark Floyd vs. City of New York federal trial, </a>which challenges the constitutionality of the<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/"> racially skewed</a> stop-and-frisk tactic. Adams told the court about a 2010 meeting between Kelly and New York's then-Gov. David Patterson. Adams, also present at the meeting, testified that the commissioner had expressly stated that black and Latino men should be targeted in police stops. Kelly, according to the city's attorney, has flatly denied making such claims.</p><p>Ryan Devereaux <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/01/nypd-ray-kelly-instil-fear">reported </a>for the Guardian:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly, NYPD doesn&#8217;t love surveillance anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement agencies monitor our most basic acts. But try assigning them a watchdog and they resist with fury]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big Brother theory of surveillance goes something like this: pervasive snooping and monitoring shouldn't frighten innocent people, it should only make lawbreakers nervous because they are the only ones with something to hide. Those who subscribe to this theory additionally argue that the widespread awareness of such surveillance creates a permanent preemptive deterrent to such lawbreaking ever happening in the first place.</p><p>I don't personally agree that this logic is a convincing justification for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/what_does_a_police_state_look_like/">American Police State</a>, and when I hear such arguments, I inevitably find myself confused by the contradiction of police-state proponents proposing to curtail freedom in order to protect it. But whether or not you subscribe to the police-state tautology, you have to admit there is more than a bit of hypocrisy at work when those who forward the Big Brother logic simultaneously insist such logic shouldn't apply to them or the governmental agencies they oversee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget Bloomberg&#8217;s nanny state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Police Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police commissioner ray kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's his approach to public safety that's the bigger danger to our freedoms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen it with my own eyes, and heard the stories of cousins, brothers and friends. Innocent of crime, guilty of no infraction, they are harassed, placed against walls, handcuffed, sometimes released, sometimes incited -- but never respected. For many African-American citizens of New York City, there is an axiomatic truth that the New York Police Department neither <em>serves</em> nor <em>protects</em> them.</p><p>This month, NYPD's controversial stop-and-frisk policy -- which entails officers regularly stopping predominantly black and Latino men and frisking them for weapons and drugs -- went on trial in federal Court. The class-action lawsuit, Floyd v. City of New York, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/23/opinion/walking-while-black-in-new-york.html">challenges the NYPD policy</a> on the basis that it violates the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause, and the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure. According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, the NYPD's own data show hundreds of thousands of unconstitutional stops in the past three years alone, and expert <a href="http://dailykos.com/story/2013/03/24/1196149/-Stop-and-frisk-on-trial">analysis of their data</a> -- controlling for crime, neighborhood and patterns of police deployment -- has found that the mitigating factor in NYPD stops is race.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD taunted crying 13-year-old during stop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More indicting details arise in the landmark trial challenging police practices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the second week of the landmark Floyd v. City of New York trial, witness testimony has revealed more indicting details about the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practices. Appearing on the stand Wednesday, police officer Brian Dennis<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/nypd-admits-taunted-innocent-teen-stop-frisk-article-1.1300447"> testified</a> that he had taunted a 13-year-old boy after he detained him. Dennis told the handcuffed child, Devin Almonor, to "stop crying like a little girl."</p><p>The teen was reportedly stopped on the street in Harlem when he reached into his pants' waistband. The two officers that stopped him claimed to have been searching for a firearm, but Almonor was found to be carrying no weapons. He was nonetheless handcuffed, taunted and taken to the stationhouse.</p><p>Meanwhile, as Ryan Devereaux reported for <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/27/nypd-stop-and-frisk-memo?CMP=twt_fd&amp;CMP=SOCxx2I2">the Guardian</a>, an internal NYPD memo sent to commanding officers earlier this month "amounts to an admission that the [stop-and-frisk] program is deeply flawed. The Center for Constitutional Rights, which brought the class action lawsuit against the city, objected to the memo being entered into evidence. The group argued that civil rights groups have been pushing for police to issue such directives for years; the release of such a memo on the eve of the landmark trial has thus raised some eyebrows. Via Devereaux:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Gregory irate about soda, meh on civil rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Late Show With David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In national interviews, Mayor Bloomberg gets grilled about beverage sizes. His stop-and-frisk policy? Not so much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg's NYPD is stopping large numbers of innocent people walking down the street each day -- questioning them as to their whereabouts and invasively frisking their bodies in a hunt for weapons and drugs. The stops are almost entirely (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/nyregion/fighting-stop-and-frisk-tactic-but-hitting-racial-divide.html?_r=0">nearly nine in 10</a>) targeting young black and Latino men. The overwhelming majority of those stopped are doing nothing wrong (just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/opinion/stop-and-frisk-in-new-york-city.html">6 percent of stops lead to arrests</a>, and a small fraction of those <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/26/nyregion/in-the-bronx-resistance-to-prosecuting-stop-and-frisk-arrests.html?pagewanted=all">are ever prosecuted</a>). And it's having a deleterious effect on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/video/2012/06/12/opinion/100000001601732/the-scars-of-stop-and-frisk.html">psyche of the targets</a> (as well as <a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2013/03/heres_why_new_york_citys_stop-and-frisk_trial_is_really_important.html">community relations with police)</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sunday Shows take on guns and gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sunday Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today. more Iraq War salesmen hype the Iran threat and David Gregory stands up for the right to drink soda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting thing I've noted since I started watching the mostly wretched Sunday shows is that for the most part there is not much debate, between the liberal and conservative panel mainstays, on gay marriage. Everyone is in favor of it or not inclined to strongly oppose it. So in order to have a proper right-vs-left Sunday Show Debate on the matter, two of the shows today were forced to bring in outspoken bigots. National embarrassments Tony Perkins and Ralph Reed both gamely answered the call, and defended "traditional marriage" from the inevitable march of widespread acceptance of gays and lesbians.</p><p>First, though, ABC's "This Week," the only one of the big three shows this morning to have another idiotic debate about budgets, began with George Stephanopoulos actually bragging -- bragging! -- that he had both Jim Messina <em>and</em> Karl Rove. Oh boy, two campaign strategists! When I am looking for well-considered and thoughtful commentary on national issues, I always turn to people who are good at managing political campaigns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second cop confirms NYPD arrest quotas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest quotas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two officers this week have taken stand in landmark stop-and-frisk trial to speak on illegal quota system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">noted here</a> earlier this week, suspended NYPD officer Adhyl Polanco testified Tuesday in the landmark <em>Floyd vs. City of New York</em> trial that his supervisors pushed quotas for stop-and-frisk searches and arrests. Polanco's statements came the same day that an audio recording, leaked to The Nation, revealed that the police union colluded with NYPD on setting a monthly quota of 20 summonses and one arrest per officer. While the NYPD has denied operating a quota system -- which would be illegal -- yet another cop has come forward to testify that quotas are very much at work. Via <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/21/second-new-york-cop-confirms-illegal-quota-system/">Raw Story:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Momentum surges for police reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest quotas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYC politicians push for a police watchdog. A federal judge examines stop and frisk. Dramatic change may be coming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYPD is currently on trial in more ways than one. While<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/"> a federal judge presides over a landmark case </a>challenging the constitutionality of the police department's stop-and-frisk tactic, political will is growing to ban the racially divisive policing practices and to increase oversight on NYPD behavior. From the streets of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/anger_at_nypd_after_shooting_of_16_year_old_boils_over_in_streets/">East Flatbush</a> to the forums of mayoral debates, momentum is growing to challenge the NYPD as it currently operates.</p><p>While Mayor Bloomberg's administration has long maintained that independent oversight of the NYPD is not necessary, his ally, City Council Speaker (and mayoral candidate) Christine Quinn announced Tuesday that lawmakers had reached a deal to install an inspector general to monitor the vast police department. The call for an inspector general, who could have investigative powers and the ability to issue subpoenas, followed mounting evidence of widespread discriminatory policing, both in the form of stop-and-frisks (over 86 percent of which target black and Latino New Yorkers) and the NYPD's spying on Muslim communities. For a careful politician like Quinn to support such a proposal reflects a shifting political tide towards reform.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaked audio: Police union set arrest quotas with NYPD</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/leaked_audio_police_union_set_arrest_quotas_with_nypd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/leaked_audio_police_union_set_arrest_quotas_with_nypd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest quotas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recording that will be used in the Stop-and-Frisk trial suggests the union have been pushing illegal quotas ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Nation <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/173397/audio-new-yorks-police-union-worked-nypd-set-arrest-and-summons-quotas">reported</a> Tuesday, a revealing secret recording expected to be used as evidence in the current Stop-and-Frisk federal trial confirms an instance of New York City’s police union cooperating with the NYPD in setting arrest quotas. The union, the Patrolman's Benevolent Association, has publicly spoken against arrest quotas -- believed to be a major contributing factor in the police targeting young, black and Latino men for minor arrests.</p><p>In the recording, a delegate from the police union can be heard saying that an agreement of a quota of 20 summonses and one arrest per month: “I spoke to the CO [commanding officer] for about an hour-and-a-half... 20-and-1. 20-and-1 is what the union is backing up… They spoke to the [Union] trustees. And that’s what they want, they want 20-and-1.” (20-and-1 means 20 summonses and one arrest per month.)</p><p>The Nation reported that, although illegal, there is reason to believe that a broad, functioning quota system is in place:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/leaked_audio_police_union_set_arrest_quotas_with_nypd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/leaked_audio_police_union_set_arrest_quotas_with_nypd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With stop-and-frisk on trial, City goes after plaintiff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/city_questions_politics_of_stop_and_frisk_plaintiff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/city_questions_politics_of_stop_and_frisk_plaintiff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In first day of arguments, NYC lawyers focus on "activism" of man speaking out against NYPD tactic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the first day of<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/"> the landmark federal trial</a> challenging the constitutionality of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practices, the city's attorneys seemed to set up a catch-22 for proving improper police action. Witnesses who took the stand to speak about feeling persecuted when stopped and searched by New York cops had their credibility challenged for having a stance against stop-and-frisk.</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/david-floyd-stop-and-frisk-trial_n_2903682.html?1363652022">Matt Sledge at HuffPo reported </a>that David Floyd, the lead plaintiff in the case, and Harlem teenager Devin Alomonor both took the stand Monday. Both men have been stopped and frisked by the NYPD. Floyd, a medical student in the Bronx, was stopped twice by police -- once just walking along the sidewalk, once helping a neighbor into their apartment. Sledge noted that the city's lawyer, Morgan Kunz, offered a "preview of the city's courtroom strategy" in her cross-examinations of the two men:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/city_questions_politics_of_stop_and_frisk_plaintiff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/city_questions_politics_of_stop_and_frisk_plaintiff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop-and-frisk goes on trial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center for constitutional rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The landmark federal class-action will challenge the NYPD for targeting young black and Latino men]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The landmark federal trial, <em>Floyd vs. City of New York</em>, which challenges the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk practices used by the NYPD. Lawyers with the Center for Constitutional Rights who are bringing the class-action suit believe it will be the "trial of the century," probing whether the police have been unlawfully stopping black and Latino young men.</p><p>As the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/18/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-trial-to-open-this-week-in-federal-court.html?_r=0">noted</a>, the class-action "claims to represent 'hundreds of thousands if not millions of people' who experienced 'suspicionless and race-based stops' by the city’s police officers." The NYCLU noted last week that the NYPD under Mayor Bloomberg have carried out <a href="http://www.nyclu.org/news/nypd-lodge-5-millionth-street-stop-under-mayor-bloomberg-today">5 million </a>stop and searches, over 86 percent of which on black or Latino individuals.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trial over NYPD stop-and-frisk tactic set to begin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/trial_over_nypd_stop_and_frisk_tactic_set_to_begin_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/trial_over_nypd_stop_and_frisk_tactic_set_to_begin_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal civil rights trial on the controversial tactic could bring major reforms to nation's largest police force]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — The New York Police Department's practice of stopping, questioning and frisking people on the street is facing its biggest legal challenge this week with a federal civil rights trial on whether the tactic unfairly targets minorities.</p><p>Police have made about 5 million stops of New Yorkers in the past decade, mostly black and Hispanic men. The trial, set to begin Monday, will include testimony from a dozen people who say they were targeted because of their race and from police whistleblowers who say they were forced into making slipshod stops by bosses who were too focused on numbers.</p><p>"When we say stop, question and frisk, we're not talking about a brief inconvenience on the way to work or school," said Darius Charney of the Center for Constitutional Rights, the lead attorney on the case. "We're talking about a frightening, humiliating experience that has happened to many folks."</p><p>U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin, who has said in earlier rulings that she is deeply concerned about stop and frisk, is not being asked to ban the tactic, since it has been found to be legal. But she does have the power to order reforms, which could bring major changes to how the nation's largest police force and other departments use the tactic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/trial_over_nypd_stop_and_frisk_tactic_set_to_begin_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/trial_over_nypd_stop_and_frisk_tactic_set_to_begin_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD make 5 millionth stop-and-frisk under Bloomberg</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYCLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 86 percent of people stopped were black or Latino]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an NYCLU announcement Thursday, the NYPD have now carried out over 5 million stop-and-frisks under Mayor Bloomberg, over 86 percent of which on black or Latino individuals. The analysis of police data also revealed that 88 percent of the stops did not result in an arrest or summons (and of course an even smaller proportion ever lead to a conviction).</p><p><a href="http://www.nyclu.org/news/nypd-lodge-5-millionth-street-stop-under-mayor-bloomberg-today">Via the NYCLU:</a></p><blockquote><p>“This disturbing milestone is a slap in the face to New Yorkers who cherish the right to walk down the street without being interrogated or even thrown up against the wall by the police,” said NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman. “The NYPD’s routine abuse of stop-and-frisks is a tremendous waste of police resources, it sows mistrust between officers and the communities they serve, and it routinely violates fundamental rights. A walk to the subway, corner deli or school should not carry the assumption that you will be confronted by police, but that’s the disturbing reality for young men of color in New York City.”</p> <p>To stop a person lawfully, a police officer must have reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing or is about to commit a crime.</p></blockquote><p>This year the racist stop-and-frisk practices have come under increasing scrutiny. Monday will see the beginning of a landmark trial -- a federal class-action lawsuit filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights challenging the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk practices. As HuffPo's Matt Sledge <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/13/stop-and-frisk-lawsuit_n_2870401.html">noted</a>, the lawyers bringing the suit against the police believe it will be the "trial of the century."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most New Yorkers oppose stop-and-frisk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/most_new_yorkers_oppose_stop_and_frisk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/most_new_yorkers_oppose_stop_and_frisk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police commissioner ray kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayoral race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New poll finds New Yorkers significantly less likely to vote for a mayor who approves the NYPD policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/new-york-city/release-detail?ReleaseID=1856">poll from Quinnipiac University</a> found that the majority of New Yorkers oppose the NYPD's controversial stop-and-frisk policy. 55 to 39 percent of voters said they disapprove of the tactic and 44 to 22 percent that they are less likely rather than more likely to vote for a mayoral candidate who supports continuing stop-and-frisk.</p><p>However, New Yorkers did show support for stop-and-frisk's most staunch defender, Police Commissioner Ray Kelly:</p><blockquote><p>New York City voters approve 66 - 26 percent of the job Police Commissioner Ray Kelly is doing and approve 61 - 31 percent of the job police are doing in general... voters say 32 - 21 percent that they are more likely rather than less likely to vote for a candidate who supports keeping Kelly as police commissioner.</p></blockquote><p>The NYPD has come under increasing pressure from civil liberties and community groups over stop-and-frisk and the disproportionate targeting of young black and Latino men. Three ongoing <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/stop_and_frisk_program_in_bronx_ruled_unconstitutional/">lawsuits </a>have been brought by civil rights groups this year challenging the constitutionality of the practice -- legal efforts that Commissioner Kelly has vehemently opposed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/most_new_yorkers_oppose_stop_and_frisk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/most_new_yorkers_oppose_stop_and_frisk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg&#8217;s new pot arrest policy isn&#8217;t that great</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/bloombergs_new_pot_arrest_policy_isnt_that_great/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/bloombergs_new_pot_arrest_policy_isnt_that_great/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13202761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arrestees won't spend a night in jail, but arrests and the stop-and-frisks that lead to them remain problematic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's State of the City address Thursday, he <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/ny_marijuana_arrestees_will_no_longer_spend_night_in_jail/">announced</a> a new policy for marijuana arrests, which will go into effect in the city next month: Individuals arrested for marijuana possession will get desk appearance tickets instead of 24 hours in the central booking jail.</p><p>Crucially, this is not an end to marijuana arrests, or the NYPD's controversial stop-and-frisk policies that usually precede them. Nor does Bloomberg's announcement bring New Yorkers closer to legalization.</p><p>Harry Levine, professor of sociology at CUNY and longtime researcher into marijuana arrests and policy, noted that based on news reports from Bloomberg's speech, "some readers may conclude that now police will just be giving out tickets. That is not accurate." In an email, Levine detailed exactly what the new policy means for marijuana arrests:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/bloombergs_new_pot_arrest_policy_isnt_that_great/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/bloombergs_new_pot_arrest_policy_isnt_that_great/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family of teen shot dead by NYPD pursue lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/family_of_teen_shot_dead_by_nypd_pursue_lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/family_of_teen_shot_dead_by_nypd_pursue_lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramarley graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police brutality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ramarley Graham's family brings latest suit to criticize police training and racial targeting in stop-and-frisks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another lawsuit has been filed to take aim at the NYPD's stop-and-frisk policy. In this particular suit, anger toward the police practice and its effects is born of personal tragedy. The family of Ramarley Graham, an unarmed teenager who was shot dead in his Bronx bathroom by police exactly one year ago, are suing the police, accusing the department of poor officer training and disproportionately targeting minority youths with stops.</p><p>Writing in the Guardian, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/03/ramarley-graham-family-sues-nypd-anniversary">Ryan Devereaux details</a> the contents of the Graham family lawsuit:</p><blockquote><p>At over 100 pages in length, the Graham family lawsuit paints a picture of a chaotic scene the afternoon Ramarley was killed. It alleges that after forcing his way into the Graham home, Haste shot the unarmed teenager in the chest in his bathroom, as his six-year-old brother and 58-year-old grandmother, Patricia Hartley, looked on.</p> <p>"Why did you shoot him, why you killed him?" Hartley cried out after Haste fired, the suit claims. "Get the fuck away before I have to shoot you, too," Haste is said to have replied as he shoved Graham's 85-pound grandmother into a vase, the suit alleges.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/family_of_teen_shot_dead_by_nypd_pursue_lawsuit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/family_of_teen_shot_dead_by_nypd_pursue_lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD can temporarily continue unconstitutional stop-and-frisks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/nypd_can_temporarily_continue_unconstitutional_stop_and_frisks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/nypd_can_temporarily_continue_unconstitutional_stop_and_frisks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean halls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge allows the practice to go on while the city appeals decision over trespass searches in the Bronx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has allowed the NYPD to continue its stop-and-frisk program in Bronx "Clean Halls" apartment buildings, despite having ruled the trespass searches unconstitutional<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/stop_and_frisk_program_in_bronx_ruled_unconstitutional/"> earlier this month.</a></p><p>U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled Tuesday that suspicion-less stops in Bronx buildings in designated high crime areas can go on while the city appeals her decision. "The opinion acknowledges at the outset that many of the questions raised by stop-and-frisk are not easily answered and that it may be difficult to say where, precisely, to draw the line between constitutional and unconstitutional police encounters," read Sheindlin's decision.</p><p>Her ruling in early January had been celebrated by civil liberties groups like the NYCLU, who brought the suit against the police over searches carried out during sweeps of “Clean Halls” apartments. Operation Clean Halls, established in the 1991, gives police permission to stop and search individuals in and around New York apartment buildings in high crime areas. In 2011,  according to the NYCLU , police stopped <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/15/ny-defends-contested-police-stop-and-frisk-operation-clean-halls_n_1968708.html" target="_hplink">1,137 of the 1,857 “Clean Halls” residents in the Bronx</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/nypd_can_temporarily_continue_unconstitutional_stop_and_frisks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/nypd_can_temporarily_continue_unconstitutional_stop_and_frisks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>