<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Susan M. Collins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/susan_m_collins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; vote will happen in lame duck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/13/dadt_vote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A stand-alone bill repealing the discriminatory policy will come to the floor soon, according to a Senate source]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Susan Collins/Joe Lieberman stand-alone "don't ask, don't tell" repeal bill should come to a vote "later this week or early next week," <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/255158/hill-buzz-stand-alone-dadt-repeal-robert-costa">according to a "senior Senate aide" who spoke to the National Review's Robert Costa.</a></p><p>Meanwhile, three former service members <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/12/with_repeals_fate_uncertain_ne.html">have filed suit in federal court</a> arguing that the policy is unconstitutional. And the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network has two more lawsuits in the pipeline. Repeal via the courts <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/the_courts_will_repeal_dadt_if.html">looks more likely now</a> than it ever has before. While Republicans might enjoy that, because it would give them a chance to complain about activist judges, the Pentagon -- and lawmakers like Sen. Lieberman -- would much prefer legislative repeal to judicial repeal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid may go ahead on &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; without Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maine Republican demands days of debate that the Senate may not have time for]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DREAM Act <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/132909-senate-postpones-consideration-of-dream-act-after-house-passage">is probably dead</a>, and now the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" hangs in the balance. This morning, things looked good. <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/is_dadt_repeal_in_trouble_agai.html?wprss=plum-line">But it all may be falling apart.</a> Or not.</p><p>No one seems to know exactly where everyone stands. <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/is_dadt_repeal_in_trouble_agai.html?wprss=plum-line">It looked like</a> Maine Senator Susan Collins agreed to vote for the defense authorization bill in exchange for four days of floor debate and 15 amendments, but Reid might think that's just another delaying tactic. So... Reid may hold a vote today, or this week, in which case Collins will almost certainly vote against it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maine&#8217;s moderate senators sabotaging DREAM Act, &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/maine_dream_dadt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/maine_dream_dadt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/08/maine_dream_dadt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympia Snowe comes out against sensible DREAM Act, Susan Collins delays a "don't ask, don't tell" vote]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maine's moderate Republican senators, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, are again proving themselves to be totally reasonable people whom you can always rely on to negotiate in good faith. Today Olympia Snowe is killing the DREAM Act and Susan Collins is strongly considering blocking the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell."</p><p>The DREAM Act provides a lengthy and fairly arduous path to citizenship for people who immigrated to America as children and then attended college or served honorably in the armed forces, providing they spend a decade on their very, very best behavior. <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/254852/re-dream-expected-fail-senate-mark-krikorian">Olympia Snowe has come out against it.</a>&#160;Because there are too many immigrants:</p><blockquote>
<p>"Millions of illegal immigrants could attempt to become legal residents as a result of this proposal, according to some estimates, and it is incumbent upon the Senate to ensure our policies never again lead to a situation where we are confronted with upwards of 12 million illegal immigrants residing within our borders."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/maine_dream_dadt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/maine_dream_dadt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Collins asks Bush to tell her how to vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/29/susan_collins_bush_start/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/29/susan_collins_bush_start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/29/susan_collins_bush_start</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The moderate Maine Republican needs a former president to tell her if the START treaty is good or bad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Sen. Susan Collins -- one of the two <a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Issues/Budget-Impact/2010/07/16/David-Obey-I-Leave-More-Discontented-Than-I-Started.aspx">"crown princesses from Maine"</a> -- is a very moderate and reasonable Republican, and so she is reserving judgment on President Obama's arms control treaty with Russia, which requires 67 votes for ratification.</p><p>Primary Republican negotiator Sen. Jon Kyl would like to delay the vote until the new Congress begins, so that Rand Paul has a chance to vote "no," but if the Obama administration can round up enough moderate Republican "yes" votes, they'd really like to get this thing done during the lame duck session. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/27/AR2010112703599.html">What would help Susan Collins make up her mind, exactly?</a></p><blockquote>
<p>"It would be wonderful if President [George H.W.] Bush would come out for the treaty. That would be so powerful and definitely help," Collins said in a telephone interview last week.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/29/susan_collins_bush_start/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/29/susan_collins_bush_start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; repeal depends on Maine senators</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/dadt_maine_senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/dadt_maine_senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/21/dadt_maine_senators</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Collins won't support bill unless Republicans get to add amendments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon, the Senate will attempt to begin debate on the defense authorization bill, which <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/98040/high-stakes-for-dream-act-and-dadt-repeal-in-todays-vote">has passed for the last 48 years running.</a> But this time, Harry Reid has attached an amendment that would end "don't ask, don't tell," the military policy that discriminates against gays and lesbians. Reid also wants to add an amendment that would provide an easier road to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who serve in the American armed forces.</p><p>Republicans will filibuster, and attempt to add other amendments. <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42455_Page2.html">Reid's plan:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>Democrats have said Reid planned to allow votes on only three significant amendments: one to strip the &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; repeal language, one to add the DREAM Act and another to end the practice of secret holds on legislation and nominations.</p>
</blockquote><p>It will take 60 votes to bring the authorization bill to the floor with DADT repeal attached, and 60 votes to add the DREAM act.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/dadt_maine_senators/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/dadt_maine_senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday link dump: Ben Stein&#8217;s money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/monday_link_dump_17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/monday_link_dump_17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/20/monday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maine Republicans worry, Christine O'Donnell diagnoses homosexuality, and Kaus finds a job]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/us/politics/20mods.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">just so upset about these tea parties.</a></li>
<li>Christine O'Donnell thinks homosexuality <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/09/christine_odonnell_said_gays_s.html">is "an identity disorder."</a></li>
<li>Democrats looking <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/09/20/green-shoots-for-democrats-in-new-york.aspx">OK in New York.</a></li>
<li>Which anonymous source was right in his or her speculation <a href="http://wonkette.com/422555/unnamed-politico-source-disagrees-with-unnamed-nyt-sources-politico-says">about the Democrats' upcoming theoretical ad campaign?</a></li>
<li>On <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/09/on-the-cheapness-of-life/63172/">Marty Peretz, the whiteness of the New Republic, and bigotry.</a></li>
<li>Lindsey Graham admitted that Republicans <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=09&amp;year=2010&amp;base_name=looking_forward_to_the_next_un">will just blatantly exploit terror attacks for political gain, and no one cares.</a></li>
<li>Ben Stein <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/20/ben-steins-fiscal-policy/">is still a disingenuous hack.</a></li>
<li>Oy, there might be <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/09/how-to-spot-a-whitewash-in-armys-death-squad-inquiry/">an American death squad in Afghanistan.</a></li>
<li>Howard Fineman is <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/daskrapital/2010/09/20/howard-fineman-is-from-the-fucking-future/">going to join the internet!</a> And Newsweek just bought itself <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/kausfiles/2010/09/20/get-me-more-sarah-palin.html">Mickey Kaus.</a> (Kaus, last year: <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/kausfiles/archive/2009/04/22/michael-wolff-topic-killer.aspx">"I used to work for [Jane] Harman and like her."</a>)</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/monday_link_dump_17/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/monday_link_dump_17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State aid bill passes Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A scaled-down, food stamp-slashing, paid-for aid bill squeaks through with help from Maine's Republicans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate approved cloture on Harry Reid's state aid bill minutes ago by a vote of 61-38, with nude Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown voting no and Democratic troll Ben Nelson -- along with both of <a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Issues/Budget-Impact/2010/07/16/David-Obey-I-Leave-More-Discontented-Than-I-Started.aspx">the two crown princesses from Maine</a> -- voting yes. So teachers in Nevada and Maine will not be fired, and states will be able to pay their Medicaid bills for six months.</p><p>(Assuming the House approves this, that is, after they return from recess. Unless they revolt over something like the fact that the bill is funded in part by rolling back food stamp benefits and <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40623.html">gutting a renewable energy investment fund</a>.)</p><p>Republicans -- who "support" state aid, as long as it's paid for -- then tried to kill this paid-for state aid with the usual rules tricks, but that failed. And now everyone is moving on to making grandstanding speeches about Elena Kagan, which should be entertaining. (Like, here's Roland Burris! Enjoy every minute of this, Roland.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Collins spreads central myth about the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/collins_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/collins_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald//2010/02/01/collins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The claim that the Bill of Rights applies only to Americans is increasingly made, but patently false]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, Sen. Susan Collins released <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8j9lwTmiSA&amp;feature=player_embedded">a five-minute video</a> in which she sounded as though she were possessed by the angriest, most unhinged version of Dick Cheney.&#160; Collins recklessly accused the Obama administration of putting us all in serious danger by failing to wage War against the Terrorists.&#160; Most of what she said was just standard right-wing boilerplate, but there was one claim in particular that deserves serious attention, as it has become one of the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/01/07/kt-mcfarland-christmas-day-terror-attack-napolitano/">most pervasive myths in our political discourse</a>:&#160;&#160;namely, that the&#160;U.S. Constitution protects only American citizens, and not any dreaded foreigners.&#160; Focusing on the&#160;DOJ's decision to charge the alleged attempted Christmas Day bomber with crimes, Mirandize him and provide him with counsel, Collins railed:&#160;&#160;"Once afforded <strong>the protection our Constitution guarantees American citizens</strong>, this foreign terrorist 'lawyered up' and stopped talking"&#160;(<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/1/31/173422/852">h/t</a>).&#160; This notion that the protections of the Bill of Rights specifically and the Constitution generally apply only to the Government's treatment of American citizens is blatantly, undeniably false -- for multiple reasons -- yet this myth is growing, as a result of being centrally featured in "War on Terror" propaganda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/collins_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/collins_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>716</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The story behind a stalled Obama nominee</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/southers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/southers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erroll Southers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint, R-S.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/01/12/southers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erroll Southers would bring a lot of experience, along with a whiff of scandal, to the TSA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erroll Southers has been waiting for months now to become the new head of the Transportation Security Administration, and it looks like he's still got a wait ahead of him.</p><p>President Obama nominated Southers for the post back in September. Even after the attempted bombing of Northwest Flight 253 on Christmas Day, though, Southers' confirmation <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2009/12/28/tsa/index.html">has been stalled.</a> First, it was held up because Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., was concerned that the nominee would allow TSA workers to unionize. Now, DeMint <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/06/AR2010010604499.html">and other Republicans say</a> they're worried about inconsistencies in Southers' account of a decades-old incident in which he inappropriately accessed confidential information.</p><p>Meanwhile, despite -- or perhaps because of -- the substantial amount of attention Southers has gotten as a result of his stalled nomination and the Christmas attack, the details of his career prior to being nominated have remained unexplored. Regardless of political agendas on either side of the aisle, Southers does have impressive qualifications: He'd bring over three decades of experience in law enforcement, counterterrorism and airport security to the job.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/southers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/12/southers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to go courting Republicans for healthcare bill?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/healthcare_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/healthcare_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/11/23/healthcare_gop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With some Senate Democrats unenthusiastic about reform legislation, votes may have to come from elsewhere]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2009/11/21/senate_vote/index.html">Senate vote</a> on Democrats' healthcare reform bill Saturday night was close -- maybe too close. Majority Leader Harry Reid won an important victory, no doubt, but he had only the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture and move the legislation to the floor, no more. He may not have all 60 when the next cloture motion, the one to break a Republican filibuster and force an up-or-down vote, comes around.</p><p>One member of the Senate's Democratic caucus, Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., has already said he intends to support a filibuster if the bill includes a public option. And he's not the only one saying something like that -- Sens. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Ben Nelson of Nebraska are also talking defection.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/healthcare_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/healthcare_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Sen. Collins will back Sotomayor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/collins_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/collins_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/07/21/collins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the GOP's moderates says she'll support the Supreme Court nominee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, didn't have a <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/07/13/sot.graham.sotomayor.pool">complete meltdown</a> during her confirmation hearings, more and more Republicans are now hopping on her bandwagon as it pulls out of the station. Tuesday, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, became the fourth Senate Republican to <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2009/07/collins-will-support-sotomayor-for-supreme-court.html">announce</a> that she will vote to confirm Sotomayor.</p><p>In a <a href="http://senatorcollins.blogspot.com/2009/07/senator-collins-announces-intent-to.html">statement</a>, Collins said, "I know that I will not agree with every decision Justice Sotomayor reaches on the Court, just as I disagree with some of her previous decisions. However ... I have concluded that Judge Sotomayor understands the proper rule of a judge and is committed to applying the law impartially without bias or favoritism."</p><p>On Friday, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/07/17/lugar_sotomayor/index.html">said</a> he would support Sotomayor. Maine's other senator, Olympia Snowe, has also said Sotomayor has her vote, as has Florida Sen. Mel Martinez.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/collins_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/collins_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the GOP to blame for swine flu?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/27/swine_flu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/27/swine_flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/27/swine_flu</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans opposed money in the stimulus for preparation for this kind of emergency, and one senator ensured its removal. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any time there's a lot of attention given to something like swine flu, you can expect it to become a political issue, and quickly. This is no exception, as Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is taking <a href="http://www.memeorandum.com/090427/p10#a090427p10">a lot of heat</a> from the left for having successfully fought to remove several hundred million dollars for preparations for pandemic flu from the stimulus. So is Karl Rove, who, in one of his <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123379742941850311.html">columns</a> for the Wall Street Journal, listed that funding as an example of what he thought were the problems with the bill.</p><p>I've <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/01/28/health_stimulus/">written previously</a> about the various stimulus funding for disease prevention and other health-related programs that was opposed by the GOP for one reason or another. As I said back then, I&#160;think that money was -- despite what critics said -- stimulative, and should have remained in the bill:&#160;Not only would jobs have been created as programs were created or expanded, but many of them would have led to future savings. And I do think this is a good time to remind voters why this kind of spending is something worth supporting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/27/swine_flu/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/27/swine_flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, seriously, how much longer?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/09/11/collins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/09/11/collins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2007/09/11/collins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if the Iraqis don't make political progress? Don't ask Petraeus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Maine Sen. Susan Collins:</b> Let's look ahead a year from now. If a year from now the Iraqi government has still failed to achieve significant political progress, what do we do? How long should we continue to commit American troops, American lives, American treasure if the Iraqis fail to make the political gians that everyone agrees are necessary to quell the sectarian violence? </p><p><b>Gen. David Petraeus:</b> If we arrived at that point a year from now, that is something that I would have to think very, very hard about, and that is my honest answer to you right now. That would be a very, very difficult recommendation to make at that time. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/09/11/collins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/09/11/collins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run over in the middle of the road</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/13/lieberman_77/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/13/lieberman_77/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/09/13/lieberman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Capitol Hill, Joe Lieberman's plan for a bipartisan love-in goes astray.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday was supposed to be a day of political self-affirmation for Joe Lieberman. The junior senator from Connecticut, who still sits on the Democratic side of the room but is on November's ballot as an independent, was appearing at a series of events that were meant to promote his message of compromise and nonpartisan governance. It's a message that he hopes will resonate with enough voters that he will defeat the nominee of his own party, Ned Lamont. But Tuesday didn't turn out quite as Lieberman planned. </p><p>In committee chambers, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff was scheduled to address Lieberman and his colleagues on home-front progress in the "war on terror." On the Senate floor, his colleagues were beginning debate on a bipartisan port security bill that Lieberman had nurtured for months. And in the afternoon, Lieberman was scheduled to unveil a new painting to commemorate the Connecticut Compromise of 1787, when America's forefathers agreed to set their differences aside to hammer out the structure of the U.S. Constitution. At every stop along the way, Lieberman planned to take a moment to praise moderation and compromise, his campaign theme as he runs an independent campaign against the liberal upstart Lamont. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/09/13/lieberman_77/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/13/lieberman_77/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate&#039;s gun control flip-flop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/guns_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/guns_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Ashburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/05/14/guns</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans close gun-show loophole with little Democratic support.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>O</b>n Thursday, a dozen or so Republican senators attempted to backtrack on their votes against the Democratic proposal for closing the background-check loophole for gun-show gun buyers.</p><p>Unwilling to throw their support behind the Democrats' proposal, the backtracking Republicans sponsored their own amendment to close the loophole. Not wanting to let Republicans get away with it, however, most Democrats in turn opposed the Republican amendment. It narrowly passed the Senate on Friday, 48-47, with only one Democrat, Robert Byrd of West Virginia, supporting it.</p><p>The loophole, backed by the <a href="/news/feature/1999/05/02/nra/"> National Rifle Association,</a> allows the purchase of firearms at gun shows without background checks. The Democrats' original proposal, an amendment to the Juvenile Justice bill sponsored by Sen Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., would have closed the loophole. Only six Republicans supported the Democrats' original measure, however, and it lost in Wednesday's vote, 51-47.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/guns_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/guns_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cracks in the bipartisan fa</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/01/15/newsa_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/01/15/newsa_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 1999 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/01/15/newsa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As House Republicans tried to depict their impeachment vendetta as a brave civil rights struggle, the important action was all taking place off-camera.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br><font size="+1">I</font>f you missed Day 1 of the impeachment trial proceedings, don't worry. The House Republican managers' presentation offered little new or unexpected for anyone who is remotely familiar with the case against President Clinton. Network coverage began to drop off early, which made sense, because the real action was all taking place off-camera.</p><p>There were a few notable exercises in hyperbole. Recognizing the profound unpopularity of the impeachment proceedings, especially among women and minorities, Republicans are now going to great lengths to remind Americans that the Monica Lewinsky mess grew out of the president's alleged efforts to obstruct a federal civil rights case -- and that's Civil Rights, with a capital C and R. To hear Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R.-Wisc., defend the House case, you might have thought Clinton was on trial for bringing back Jim Crow, not lying about a sexual liaison with an office subordinate. After recounting the civil rights gains of this century, Sensenbrenner told senators "it's not time to abandon" the country's heroic struggle for civil rights. He challenged them to follow in the footsteps of those "who achieved equal rights for all Americans during the 1960s in Congress, in the courts and on the streets and in the buses and at the lunch counters."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/01/15/newsa_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/01/15/newsa_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impeachment diary II</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/01/13/newsb_51/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/01/13/newsb_51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/01/13/newsb</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While senators basked in the glow of Friday&#039;s bipartisan trial accord, both sides were already plotting to renew the war.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">F</font>riday's historic bipartisan closed Senate caucus was by all accounts one of the few times in memory that senators put aside their egos and their press flacks and attempted to do the right thing for the American people. My boss, no simp, called it one of the greatest moments of his Senate career.</p><p>But as senators basked in the glow of bipartisan accommodation, most insiders knew it marked a pleasant calm before a storm of partisan warfare returns to Washington.</p><p>Senators who were friends on Friday are already plotting against one another. And this time, there doesn't seem much that can save either side. Friday, we were all on Noah's Ark singing happily, wearing our raincoats. But by Monday it was clear: This is one leaky boat, and there aren't any bipartisan life preservers.</p><p>The devil is in the details, they always say. Upon further reflection, both sides now have to view the details as a map to the river of no return. We should have known. When Ted Kennedy and Phil Gramm are crafting bipartisan treaties, the apocalypse is upon us.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/01/13/newsb_51/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/01/13/newsb_51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

