<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Susan Rice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/susan_rice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The wingnut trifecta</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Bolton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wingnut trifecta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crazy GOP claims that Hillary Clinton is faking her illness slur the country's three most popular Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right-wing claims that Hillary Clinton faked illness to avoid testifying about the Benghazi tragedy would be funny if they weren't so ugly. It's the wingnut trifecta, smearing our most popular past Democratic president, Bill Clinton, along with our current president, Barack Obama, and the current 2016 front-runner, all with one shot. Imagine birtherism crossed with the worst of the hateful anti-Clinton lies, like the "Vince Foster was murdered" claim. That's Hillary-health trutherism.</p><p>But so far <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/people-who-thought-hillary-clinton-was-faking-her?_tmc=Y4z-nYSU_ZjjWvFQxx8Pbsk_Lw8Lxb5qdlRCW6DG7Q0">right-wingers claiming that Clinton somehow faked her concussion</a> have gone virtually unchallenged on Fox News and right-wing sites like Newsbusters and the Daily Caller. Everyone from Charles Krauthammer to Sean Hannity to Laura Ingraham and former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton have gotten into the act. Even after reports that Clinton also suffered a dangerous blood clot between her brain and skull, Bolton not only failed to apologize, he suggested that she was dodging Benghazi questions in order to protect her 2016 chances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the White House a boys&#8217; club?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Flournoy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats do the diversity shuffle to ensure the cabinet and Congressional committee chairs look like America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political expediency can make a sudden feminist out of anyone, apparently. There was former Romney advisor Dan Senor <a href="https://twitter.com/dansenor/status/281737762326069248">on Twitter</a> last week, expressing his distaste for potential Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel: "Isn't it strange that the President dropped Rice but is dug in over #Hagel? Especially when he can nominate the highly qualified #Flournoy?"</p><p>Senor's main implication was that Barack Obama was suddenly showing his <em>true</em> anti-Israel cards by having "dug in" on someone he hasn't even nominated yet. The secondary suggestion, what with the mention of "highly qualified" along with the fact that both Susan Rice and former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Michèle Flournoy are female, seemed to be trying to beat Obama with a stick his campaign successfully wielded against Romney's: Diversity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton: Unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hillary_clinton_unemployed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hillary_clinton_unemployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her widely heralded term as secretary of state has ended in turmoil. Could it affect her presidential prospects?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a> BUZZARDS BAY, Mass. — She has been America’s most admired woman for a decade. World leaders all but bow before her, and seas part at a flick of her hand. Late-night pundits — well, comedian <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-november-6-2012/democalypse-2012---election-night-2012--this-ends-now---democalypse-2016" target="_blank">Jon Stewart</a>, anyway — have already called the 2016 election in her favor.</p><p>Hillary Clinton announced when she was nominated for secretary of state that she would serve only one term. The ugly and divisive <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/121213/susan-rice-withdraws-secretary-state" target="_blank">battle over her replacement</a> has kept analysts busy for weeks.</p><p>Now that issue, at least, has been settled. On Friday President Barack Obama <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/121215/john-kerry-named-secretary-state">nominated Sen. John Kerry</a> (D-Mass.) for the top job at Foggy Bottom, a post Kerry reportedly has long coveted.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hillary_clinton_unemployed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hillary_clinton_unemployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama nominating Kerry for Secretary of State</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/obama_nominating_kerry_for_secretary_of_state_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/obama_nominating_kerry_for_secretary_of_state_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If confirmed, Kerry will replace Hillary Clinton at the State Department]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A senior administration official says President Barack Obama on Friday will nominate Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., as his next secretary of state.</p><p>Kerry's nomination marks Obama's first move in a sweeping overhaul of his national security team heading into a second term.</p><p>If confirmed, Kerry will take the helm at the State Department from outgoing Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton. The Massachusetts senator is expected to be easily approved for the Cabinet post by his longtime Capitol Hill colleagues.</p><p>Kerry leapt to the front of Obama's list for the State Department job after U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice withdrew her name from consideration last week.</p><p>The official requested anonymity in order to discuss the announcement ahead of Obama.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/obama_nominating_kerry_for_secretary_of_state_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/obama_nominating_kerry_for_secretary_of_state_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Rice withdraws candidacy for secretary of state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After repeated GOP attacks, she says the nomination process for secretary of state would be "disruptive and costly"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid John McCain's continued threats to block her nomination, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice announced that she will withdraw her candidacy for secretary of state.</p><p>"If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly -- to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities," Rice wrote in a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/12/13/National-Politics/Graphics/SER-letter.pdf">letter</a> to President Obama, NBC News first reported. "That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country ... Therefore, I respectfully request that you no longer consider my candidacy at this time."</p><p>"The position of Secretary of State should never be politicized," Rice continued. "As someone who grew up in an era of comparative bipartisanship and as a sitting U.S. national security official who has served in two U.S. Administrations, I am saddened that we have reached this point, even before you have decided whom to nominate. We cannot afford such an irresponsible distraction from the most pressing issues facing the American people."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain will hound Susan Rice to the ends of the earth (or just the Senate Foreign Relations Committee)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The angry "maverick" seeks a seat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to continue his Susan Rice crusade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grouchy old Sen. John "Walnuts!" McCain is always mad, and usually there is one thing in particular that he is mad at at a time. Like <a href="http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1998-02-12/news/john-mccain-breaks-up-a-fight/">for a while it was Ultimate Fighting</a>, for some reason. No one knew why, but he devoted literally all of his time as a senator to eradicating it, until a new thing made him mad and he just completely and totally forgot about UFC. Then for a long time the thing he was mad at was "George W. Bush," and that's when everyone grew to love him, but then he moved on from that, too, and he was mad at Iran for a little while, but mostly it's just been Barack Obama, for the last few years, who really gets his goat. Now he's narrowed his focus further, and the one thing in this world that he hates most is the prospect of Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice becoming secretary of state.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. again under fire over Rwanda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/us_again_under_fire_over_rwanda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/us_again_under_fire_over_rwanda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M23]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics say Susan Rice should put pressure on Rwanda's president over support of Congolese rebels]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human rights advocates and U.N. diplomats have criticized the U.S. for its failure to act over the current crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Critics charge that U.S. officials, primarily U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, should put more pressure on Rwanda to end its support for the Congolese M23 rebel movement.</p><p>According to the<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/world/un-envoy-rice-faulted-for-rwanda-tie-in-congo-conflict.html?pagewanted=2&amp;hp"> New York Times:</a></p><blockquote><p>[C]ritics — who include officials of human rights organizations and United Nations diplomats — say the administration has not put enough pressure on Rwanda’s president, <a title="More articles about Paul Kagame." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/paul_kagame/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Paul Kagame</a>, to end his support for the rebel movement whose recent capture of the strategic city of Goma in Congo set off a national crisis in a country that has already lost more than three million people in more than a decade of fighting. Rwanda’s support is seen as vital to the rebel group, known as M23.</p> <p>Support for Mr. Kagame and the Rwandan government has been a matter of American foreign policy since he led the Tutsi-dominated Rwandan Patriotic Front to victory over the incumbent government in July 1994, effectively ending the Rwandan genocide. But according to rights organizations and diplomats at the United Nations, Ms. Rice has been at the forefront of trying to shield the Rwandan government, and Mr. Kagame in particular, from international censure, even as several United Nations reports have laid the blame for the violence in Congo at Mr. Kagame’s door.</p></blockquote><p>Last week, Rice decried the actions of M23 via Facebook. "The U.S. condemns in the strongest terms horrific M23 violence. Any and all external support has to stop,” she wrote, drawing criticism for not naming Rwanda's president. Rice, who has been under fire in recent months over the narratives surrounding the September attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, remains a strong contender to replace Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/us_again_under_fire_over_rwanda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/us_again_under_fire_over_rwanda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/sunday_show_round_up_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/sunday_show_round_up_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk of the fiscal cliff dominated the discussion as Timothy Geithner toured every political talk show]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner made the rounds on all five major political talk shows this morning to discuss the president's proposal addressing the fast-approaching "fiscal cliff."  Though debates of the fiscal cliff dominated, Republicans and Democrats  also discussed <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/susan_rice_defends_benghazi_comments_calls_mccain_criticism_unfounded/">U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice's</a> possibility of being nominated for secretary of state.</p><p><strong>Fiscal Cliff</strong></p><p>Geithner emphasized the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/dems_the_ball_in_the_gops_court_on_medicare_cuts/">importance of Republican support</a> in navigating away from the nation's impending "fiscal cliff." Regarding whether or not America will go over the fiscal cliff, Geithner put the ball in the GOP's court, saying on "Fox News Sunday," "That's a decision that lies in the hands of the Republicans that are now opposing increases in tax rates."</p><p>"It's going to be very hard for them," Geithner said. "You've heard them, for the first time, I think, in two decades now, acknowledge that they're willing to have revenues go up as part of a balanced plan. That's a good first step. But they have to tell us what they're willing to do on rates and revenues. That's going to be very hard for Republicans."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/sunday_show_round_up_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/sunday_show_round_up_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_see_morning_clip_72/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_see_morning_clip_72/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart wonders if Senators McCain and Graham ever got intelligence wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Benghazi "The Daily Show" compares institutional confusion to deliberate warmongering:</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 400px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:421594" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-november-28-2012/legends-of-the-fault">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_see_morning_clip_72/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/must_see_morning_clip_72/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More setbacks for Susan Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/more_setbacks_for_susan_rice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/more_setbacks_for_susan_rice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Obama defends the U.N. ambassador, a moderate GOP senator expresses doubts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama continues to defend U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice from Republican criticism of her immediate public response to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. “Susan Rice is extraordinary,” Obama told reporters before a Cabinet meeting with Rice and Hillary Clinton. “Couldn’t be prouder of the job that she’s done.” But bad news for Rice: Republican senators aren't showing any signs that they're going to back off the attacks.</p><p>Rice met with a number of Republican senators this week to try to win them over, ahead of a possible nomination for secretary of state. But so far she has not been successful.</p><p>“I continue to be troubled by the fact that the United Nations ambassador decided to play what was essentially a political role at the height of a contentious presidential election campaign,” Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, told reporters on Wednesday. She added that she “would need to have additional information” before voting to confirm Rice.</p><p>Collins, a moderate, would be a key Republican vote in the Senate if Obama were to nominate Rice. “Everybody knows [Collins] does her homework very carefully and that she thinks before she speaks, so it’s not a good sign for Susan Rice,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/more_setbacks_for_susan_rice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/more_setbacks_for_susan_rice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rice vs. Rice: What changed for John McCain since 2004?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/rice_vs_rice_what_changed_for_john_mccain_since_2004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/rice_vs_rice_what_changed_for_john_mccain_since_2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican senators attacking Susan Rice today never batted an eyelash when Condi Rice advanced bad intel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The president has just been reelected and looks to replace his secretary of state with a Ms. Rice who has already served in a senior administration position. The minority party in the Senate is threatening to obstruct her confirmation because she propagated faulty intelligence. The administration defends her, saying she merely recited the most credible intelligence of the moment and had no intention of misleading anyone, but the senators’ questions persist.</p><p>No, that's not today! That was eight years ago when George W. Bush appointed his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, to be the nation’s top diplomat a week after winning reelection.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/rice_vs_rice_what_changed_for_john_mccain_since_2004/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/rice_vs_rice_what_changed_for_john_mccain_since_2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Collins upset by Rice&#8217;s &#8220;political role&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/sen_collins_upset_by_rices_political_role/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/sen_collins_upset_by_rices_political_role/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: Hillary Clinton weighs in]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated 6:22 p.m.:</strong></p><p><strong></strong>Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Susan Rice has done a "great" job as U.N. ambassador without explicitly endorsing Rice to be her successor.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Updated 4:36 p.m.:</strong></p><p><strong></strong>In a subsequent interview with MSNBC, Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R.-N.H., agrees with Senator Collins that the 1998 embassy bombing "raised some very important questions" about Susan Rice's fitness for Secretary of State. What are those questions? Ayotte's not sure:</p><blockquote><p>As I understand it, you know, Senator Collins raised the questions about what her role was there. she has asked for answers about what her role was with respect to embassy security and embassy security requests that were made prior to those two -- the attacks on our embassies there and so I don't know that those questions have been answered but I think they're important questions that were raised by Senator Collins and I certainly respect her experience in this area.</p></blockquote><p>Neither senator addressed why the embassy bombings are of greater concern now than there were in 2009 during her honeymoon nomination process to be U.N. ambassador. According to a Nexis search, Collins had zero to say at the time about Rice being in a sensitive, high profile foreign policy position.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/sen_collins_upset_by_rices_political_role/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/sen_collins_upset_by_rices_political_role/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Ricks slaps Fox News</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/fox_news_tom_ricks_apologized_tom_ricks_no_i_didnt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/fox_news_tom_ricks_apologized_tom_ricks_no_i_didnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The network claims the Pulitzer-winning reporter apologized for his recent TV appearance. This is news to Ricks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fox News-Tom Ricks showdown continues, as Ricks denies that he apologized for his comments on the network yesterday.</p><p>Ricks, a Pulitzer-winning defense reporter, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/fox_news_cuts_off_guest_who_calls_them_a_wing_of_the_republican_party/">appeared</a> on the network to discuss Benghazi, and called out Fox News for its "hyped" coverage of the attacks, "partly because Fox was operating as a wing of the Republican Party.”</p><p>Michael Clemente, executive vice president at Fox News, told the <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/tom-ricks-fox-news-network-michael-clemente-394165">Hollywood Reporter</a> that Ricks apologized for the appearance. “When Mr. Ricks ignored the anchor’s question, it became clear that his goal was to bring attention to himself -- and his book," Clemente said. "He apologized in our offices afterward but doesn’t have the strength of character to do that publicly."</p><p>"Please ask Mr. Clemente what the words of my supposed apology were. I'd be interested to know," Ricks told the Reporter in response. "Frankly, I don't remember any such apology."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/fox_news_tom_ricks_apologized_tom_ricks_no_i_didnt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/fox_news_tom_ricks_apologized_tom_ricks_no_i_didnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Rice fails to win over Senate critics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_fails_to_win_over_senate_critics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_fails_to_win_over_senate_critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benhgazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a private meeting, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Kelly Ayotte are "more troubled"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three Republican senators who met Tuesday with U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice say they are more troubled now over her initial explanations about the deadly Sept. 11 raid in Libya.</p><p>Rice met behind closed doors Tuesday with Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Kelly Ayotte — three of her harshest critics.</p><p>Ayotte said Rice told them that her national television description that a spontaneous demonstration triggered the attack on the U.S. consulate was wrong. She had made the comments five days after the raid based on intelligence information.</p><p>The lawmakers said the Obama administration still must answer questions about the attack.</p><p>Obama is considering Rice as a successor to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.</p><p>After the meeting, according to reports, Ayotte told reporters that "it’s certainly clear from the beginning that we knew that those with ties to al-Qaida were involved in the attack on the embassy. And clearly the impression that was given of the information given to the American people was wrong. In fact, Ambassador Rice said today, absolutely, it was wrong."</p><p>She also said, "I have many more questions that need to be answered."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_fails_to_win_over_senate_critics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_fails_to_win_over_senate_critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Only 40 percent think there was a Benghazi cover-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/poll_only_40_percent_think_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/poll_only_40_percent_think_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But 54 percent say they disapprove of how the Obama Administration handled the attack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/27/cnn-poll-thumbs-down-on-w-h-reaction-to-benghazi-attack-and-petraeus-resignation/">CNN/ORC International</a> poll finds that 54 percent of the public disapproves of how the White House handled the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, while only 40 percent approves.</p><p>But, according to the poll, only 40 percent of those surveyed say that they believe the Obama Administration purposely misled the public. "Fifty-four percent think those inaccurate statements reflected what the White House believed to be true at the time," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.</p><p>48 percent of respondents also said that they believe the attack could have been prevented.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/poll_only_40_percent_think_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/poll_only_40_percent_think_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Rice meeting with senators over Benghazi attack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_meeting_with_senators_over_benghazi_attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_meeting_with_senators_over_benghazi_attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.N. Ambassador will meet with John McCain and Kelly Ayotte on Capitol Hill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice is meeting with key lawmakers in what could be her final pitch for their support if she is nominated to be the next secretary of state.</p><p>The discussions, beginning Tuesday, will focus on her much-maligned explanations of the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, officials said, but she's also clearly auditioning for America's top diplomatic job.</p><p>Despite lingering questions over her comments five days after the Benghazi attack, Rice has emerged as the front-runner on a short list of candidates to succeed Hillary Rodham Clinton, with Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., seen as her closest alternative. But despite a softening of Republican opposition to Rice, she still has work to do to ensure that enough GOP senators are willing to back her potential nomination.</p><p>Rice's series of meetings on Capitol Hill this week will therefore be a critical test both for Republicans, who will decide whether they can support her, and the administration, which must gauge whether Rice has enough support to merit a nomination. According to congressional aides and administration officials, Rice is expected to meet with small groups of lawmakers who will press her on her since-retracted description of the Benghazi attack as the byproduct of an angry protest over an American-made film ridiculing Islam. She'll be joined by acting CIA Director Michael Morell in the meetings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_meeting_with_senators_over_benghazi_attack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/susan_rice_meeting_with_senators_over_benghazi_attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain realizes GOP can&#8217;t win war on women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the GOP senator shies away from his remarks on abortion and Susan Rice, Patty Murray emerges as a Senate force]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain sounded awfully <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/mccain_gop_has_to_offer_something_to_voters/">chastened</a> yesterday. Gone was the bluster of doing "everything in my power to block" Susan Rice from a position she has yet to be nominated for. He didn't question her competence. The rage gave way to this Sunday morning walkback: "I think she deserves the ability and the opportunity to explain herself and her position, just as she said. But, she's not the problem. The problem is the president of the United States."</p><p>I doubt McCain is done being an angry, bitter man who still hasn't forgiven Rice for her <a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/susan-rice-secretary-of-state-2012-12/index1.html">attack</a> on him during the 2008 presidential campaign. But someone must have told him that trashing an accomplished, relatively young woman of color who wasn't even remotely responsible for what happened in Benghazi is just not a good look these days. Maybe McCain underestimated how many people had Rice's back, from the Congressional Black Caucus to the president himself -- just as his fellow party members had underestimated the power of the voting bloc they commanded on Nov. 6.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Rice defends Benghazi comments, calls McCain criticism &#8220;unfounded&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/susan_rice_defends_benghazi_comments_calls_mccain_criticism_unfounded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/susan_rice_defends_benghazi_comments_calls_mccain_criticism_unfounded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN ambassador and prospective secretary of state insists her initial remarks relied on an intelligence briefing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said Wednesday that her early account of the attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans in Benghazi was based on the initial intelligence community assessments and was always subject to review and updates.</p><p>She said she respects Republican Sen. John McCain, who has been critical of her, but says "some of the statements he's made about me have been unfounded, but I look forward to having the opportunity at the appropriate time to discuss all of this with him."</p><p>Her comments attributing the attacks to a mob enraged over an anti-Muslim video posted on YouTube were widely denounced by Republicans during the U.S. presidential campaign. The attack came on the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States, and her critics said it was clearly a terrorist attack aimed at the anniversary. U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed.</p><p>The focus has fallen on Rice because she is a longtime White House insider and is believed to be President Barack Obama's first choice to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who is not expected to stay on during his second term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/susan_rice_defends_benghazi_comments_calls_mccain_criticism_unfounded/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/susan_rice_defends_benghazi_comments_calls_mccain_criticism_unfounded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Rice&#8217;s cowardly critics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/susan_rices_cowardly_critics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/susan_rices_cowardly_critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Milbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even some liberal pundits are providing ammunition for John McCain -- with anonymous sources, of course]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice isn't just facing down right-wing GOP attacks these days, she's taking incoming fire from pundits widely perceived as liberal. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/opinion/sunday/dowd-is-rice-cooked.html?_r=0">Maureen Dowd went all in on Rice in a nasty column Sunday</a>, while the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-susan-rices-tarnished-resume/2012/11/16/55ec3382-3012-11e2-a30e-5ca76eeec857_story.html">Washington Post's Dana Milbank termed Rice "ill-equipped to be the nation’s top diplomat for reasons that have little to do with Libya."</a></p><p>Dowd paints Rice as looking to close an alleged "stature gap" with her Benghazi Sunday show statements, quoting a colleague blaming her troubles on being "focused on the performance, not the content." Milbank says she's made "an impressive array of enemies — on Capitol Hill, in Foggy Bottom and abroad." Both Milbank and Dowd seem to rely entirely on the anonymous testimony of such enemies; there isn't a single named source in either piece.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/susan_rices_cowardly_critics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/susan_rices_cowardly_critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain&#8217;s obscene hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/mccains_obscene_hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/mccains_obscene_hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He says Susan Rice is unfit for office because she's "not qualified." This from the man who tapped Sarah Palin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.feministing.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/feministing_logo-1.jpg" alt="Feministing" align="left" /></a> Shockingly, old white male senators are attacking a woman of color in a powerful position. The men in question are Sens. Lindsey Graham and John McCain. And the woman they’re attacking is U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice. John “I’m still bitter about losing to Obama” McCain said Rice is “<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83824.html?hp=r3">not qualified</a>” to become secretary of state and described her comments on Benghazi as “not being very bright.” Lindsey “<a href="http://gawker.com/5939404/sen-lindsey-graham-not-enough-angry-white-guys-to-sustain-gop">Republicans are not generating enough angry white guys</a>“ Graham <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57549819/graham-susan-rice-disconnected-to-reality-doesnt-deserve-promotion/">said</a> he was “dead-set on making sure” Rice doesn’t become secretary of state and called her response “so disconnected to reality I don’t trust her ... And the reason I don’t trust her is because I think she knew better, and if she didn’t know better she shouldn’t be the voice of America.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/mccains_obscene_hypocrisy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/mccains_obscene_hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>