<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Susan Sarandon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/susan_sarandon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: The overblown, funny, romantic &#8220;Cloud Atlas&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/pick_of_the_week_the_overblown_funny_romantic_cloud_atlas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/pick_of_the_week_the_overblown_funny_romantic_cloud_atlas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Tykwer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud atlas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom hanks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wachowskis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halle Berry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13052603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: Tom Hanks and Halle Berry play multiple roles in an epic fable of life and death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will tell you in the same breath that <a href="http://cloudatlas.warnerbros.com/">“Cloud Atlas”</a> is a flawed and potentially ridiculous work and that I loved it, and can’t wait to see it a second time (and then a third). Indeed, all of that is connected, as the movie itself reminds us — perhaps too many times.</p><p>I can appreciate a well-crafted work of Hollywood formula that gives the audience what it already knows it wants, at least up to a point, but I often come away feeling restless and unsatisfied. I’d almost always rather see the rare kind of pop spectacle that takes enormous risks, that reaches for grand themes, big ideas and operatic emotions, even if it makes indefensible mistakes along the way. That’s what “Cloud Atlas” is, the kind of oversize, overpriced movie that critic Stuart Klawans described in his book “Film Follies.” (The classic example would be D.W. Griffith’s silent epic “Intolerance,” which serves as a major model and influence here.) “Cloud Atlas” is arguably way too much of a good thing, with too many characters, too many stories, too many directors – Tom Tykwer of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/21/run_lola/">“Run Lola Run”</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/12/21/btm_93/">“Perfume,”</a> and Andy and Lana Wachowski (né Larry) of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_matrix/">“Matrix”</a> trilogy — and too much running time. But its too-muchness is also the source of its power; I was absolutely never bored, and felt surprised when the movie ended. It’s an amazing, baffling, thrilling and (for many, it would appear) irritating experience, and for my money the most beautiful and distinctive big-screen vision of the year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/pick_of_the_week_the_overblown_funny_romantic_cloud_atlas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/pick_of_the_week_the_overblown_funny_romantic_cloud_atlas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Gere on Obama disappointment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/15/richard_gere_on_obama_disappointment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/15/richard_gere_on_obama_disappointment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Gere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13012835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood's most famous Buddhist on Obama's "insane" wars, the coming collapse of China and his new "Arbitrage"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Gere has been in terrific movies and he’s been an A-list Hollywood leading man, but the peculiar curse of his career is that he’s rarely or never done both at the same time. I suppose that accounts for the fact that across four-plus decades and 40-odd movie roles, Gere has never been nominated for an Oscar and was often portrayed, at least in his youth, as a lightweight pretty boy – as if the character he played in Paul Schrader’s underrated “American Gigolo” in 1980 were actually him. It’s difficult, frankly, to pick a role in Gere’s long career that plausibly might have won him a statuette; both “Gigolo” and “Looking for Mr. Goodbar” were too sleazy for the Academy, and Terrence Malick’s “Days of Heaven” was way too arty. Billy Flynn in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/27/chicago_3/">“Chicago”</a>? I guess that’s the one.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/15/richard_gere_on_obama_disappointment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/15/richard_gere_on_obama_disappointment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Douglas: The last great antihero</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/solitary_man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/solitary_man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solitary Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2010/05/21/solitary_man</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "Solitary Man," the actor plays another in a long line of cads who are more interesting than they are likable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"There is nothing noble in failure," says Ben Kalmen, the protagonist of the dark comedy "<a href="http://salon.com/ent/movies/solitary_man/index.html">Solitary Man</a>." And he knows whereof he speaks. Ben is a disgraced former used car dealer and insatiable womanizer who once had all the outward trappings of success (stable marriage, lots of money, a degree of celebrity), and mysteriously and systematically began to destroy all of it. By the time the film's main action begins, he's a magnificent wreck of a man who's slowly learning that the world isn't responsible for his misery &#8211; <em>he</em> is.</p><p>Happily, Ben's dictum about failure doesn't apply to movies. Failure itself isn't noble or heroic or innately interesting; it's just a human condition like any other. But because mainstream American cinema tends to cower in fear of any behavior it considers unsympathetic and any circumstance it considers unhappy, a film about failure possesses a small degree of nobility right out of the gate. You just don't see that kind of film every day. What such a movie does after that is, of course, up to the filmmakers and the actors. Luckily, "Solitary Man" is funny and absorbing, and it features a lead performance by Michael Douglas that's both hugely entertaining in itself, and fascinating for the way it illuminates the actor's long, colorful career. Ben Kalmen isn't just a worthy addition to Douglas' personal rogues gallery; he seems to contain bits and pieces of all of them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/solitary_man/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/solitary_man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps&#8221;: Gekko&#8217;s back!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/14/wall_street_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/14/wall_street_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannes Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/05/14/wall_street</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cannes gets a peek at the "Wall Street" sequel, and a seminar on capitalism with Oliver Stone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CANNES, France -- Oliver Stone has returned to the characters and themes of his greatest success -- and arguably his greatest failure -- after 23 years in order to preach a sermon on the topic of "moral hazard." As Gordon Gekko, the legendary financial shark played by Michael Douglas, explains to a civilian in "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps," that's a term used to describe the risks involved with entrusting your money to someone like a stockbroker or an investment banker -- someone who takes no responsibility for what happens to it later.</p><p>As millions of ordinary homeowners and investors all over the developed world have discovered over the last two years or so, the moral hazard associated with capitalism's boom-and-bust cycles can produce extraordinarily painful results. Stone's long-delayed "Wall Street" sequel will surely make news as the first major motion picture to dramatize the worldwide financial crisis, and to point the finger squarely at those who induced it, exacerbated it and lied about it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/14/wall_street_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/14/wall_street_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Pacino brings Jack Kevorkian to life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/24/al_pacino_as_jack_kevorkian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/24/al_pacino_as_jack_kevorkian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Kevorkian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/heather_havrilesky/2010/04/24/al_pacino_as_jack_kevorkian</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In HBO's understated biopic, the notoriously hammy actor does something truly riveting: He disappears]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Americans are willfully ignorant about death. We cling so desperately to our distractions, our novelties, our money, our diversions, all with the illusion that we can put off death indefinitely, that any direct talk of death makes us uncomfortable.</p><p>"We're all going to die someday," the realist tells us. "We get older and older, and eventually, we die."</p><p>"Jesus, could you stop being so negative?" we respond.</p><p>"It's really best to plan for it before it happens, so we have some control over how it goes," the realist counters.</p><p>"<em>Plan</em> for it? God, you're morbid," we say, turning back to our iPhones to tweet about the fantastic pastrami we had for lunch.</p><p>We actively divert our attention from death each day, and then one day, <em>there it is</em>, rudely interrupting our normal routines, and we're bewildered by how cruel and callous the world suddenly seems. Doctors who refuse to weep with us! Coroners who go about their business as if they do this several times a day! Funeral home directors who gesture gracefully to a plentiful box of tissue, pursing their lips in a grotesque affectation of heartfelt sympathy! It's all so macabre, yet so mundane! It's just so <em>wrong</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/24/al_pacino_as_jack_kevorkian/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/24/al_pacino_as_jack_kevorkian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straight to DVD: &#8220;Tenderness&#8221; and &#8220;Peacock&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/17/straight2dvd_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/17/straight2dvd_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Straight to DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dvd reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/04/17/straight2dvd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russell Crowe! Susan Sarandon! Crazy teens and cross-dressers! We go semi-upscale with two new releases]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This corner of Film Salon is usually the dumping ground for cage fighting movies with "Stone Cold" Steve Austin and slasher flicks hosted by Flavor Flav, but this week I've got a pair of films that boast a combined three Oscar winners, a best-actress nominee and a two-time Golden Globe winner. Consider this sudden deluge of talent to be a kind of upscale outlier. Rest assured, I'll be back to pondering the greater meaning of lesbian vampire epics and rock 'n' roll werewolf programmers soon enough.</p><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0035JHYGQ?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0035JHYGQ">"Tenderness,"</a> based on the 1997 novel by Robert Cormier, did make it into limited release mostly based on the star power of Russell Crowe in a top-billed supporting role. Since most of us are seeing it on the small screen for the first time, here it is. Lori (Sophie Traub) is a confused 16-year-old who re-enacts previous sexual abuse by making out with an older man she picks up at a gas station or pulling up her shirt while her boss at the supermarket strokes himself. She's obsessed with Eric Komenko (Jon Foster), a kid who murdered his parents with his archery set but got off with a light sentence by claiming that anti-depressants drove him into a parricidal rage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/17/straight2dvd_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/17/straight2dvd_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Speed Racer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/09/speed_racer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/09/speed_racer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2008/05/09/speed_racer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know a movie's heading nowhere fast when even its monkey doesn't make you laugh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while I'm hit with a movie whose existence I find impossible to comprehend. Who is this movie for? Did anyone involved take the time to have an actual thought -- even just one -- before investing time, care and money into this thing? Andy and Larry Wachowski's "Speed Racer" is so bereft of intelligence, style and excitement that I can't figure out who in the world it's supposed to appeal to: baby boomers nostalgic for the old Japanamation cartoon on which it's based? Parents who want to cultivate ADD in their kids? The picture is bankrupt in terms of everything but color, and even then, its palette suggests not careful selection but <i>no</i> selection: There isn't a single neon-jellybean or retro-flower-power color that <i>isn't</i> represented in "Speed Racer" -- if a color is bright, it's in there. That's not visual boldness; it's cowardice -- and that's only the beginning of the picture's problems. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/09/speed_racer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/09/speed_racer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protesting the war &#8212; not just for giant puppets anymore!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/28/march_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/28/march_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/01/28/march</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of the surge, Saturday's anti-Iraq war rally in Washington included some new, mainstream faces.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before Saturday's antiwar rally in Washington, some of the <a target="new" href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2007/01/26/get_your_puppets_ready.php">snarkier</a> commentators on the Internet offered world-weary predictions of what the gathering on the Mall would bring. "You'll for sure want to go march around with <a target="new" href="http://wonkette.com/politics/hippies/free-mumia-tomorrows-the-big-antiwar-march-231793.php">giant puppets,</a> Palestinian activists [and] Free Mumia people," smirked D.C.-based blog Wonkette, while another local site, D.C.ist made <a target="new" href="http://www.dcist.com/archives/2007/01/26/jane_activists.php">jokes</a> about Jane Fonda and Tim Robbins. </p><p>Sure enough, among the 100,000 protesters gathered on the Mall Saturday afternoon, there really was a giant puppet of a devil and at least one "Free Mumia!" sign, and Jane Fonda and Tim Robbins put in appearances. But what was actually striking about the protest was how different it was from other, earlier Iraq war protests. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/01/28/march_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/28/march_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Elizabethtown&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/14/elizabethtown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/14/elizabethtown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2005/10/14/elizabethtown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameron Crowe's latest isn't as bad as you've heard, but it's still a desperate mess of a movie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron Crowe's haunted village of a movie, "Elizabethtown," has enough detail for 14 movies and not enough ballast for one. At two hours plus, it's both too long and too short: Some parts feel hastily compressed, like a book rendered in print too tiny to read comfortably. Elsewhere, Crowe stretches small moments into a luxurious groove, giving us a tantalizing -- no, make that heartbreaking -- sense of what this picture should have been. Watching "Elizabethtown" was one of the most painful moviegoing experiences I've had in years, not because the picture is that much of a chore to sit through but because I couldn't squelch the feeling that the elements of this movie -- these characters, this story, this assemblage of soundtrack music -- all quite solid on their own, had shaken out into some horribly wrong combination. "Elizabethtown" never quite feels like itself, whatever that self might be; it's as if another, subtly but significantly different movie were desperately trying to break through its skin. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/10/14/elizabethtown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/14/elizabethtown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Shall We Dance?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/15/dance_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/15/dance_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lopez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2004/10/15/dance</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Gere waltzes his way through a midlife crisis and past Jennifer Lopez and Susan Sarandon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many appealing performers in "Shall We Dance?" that it's a crime the director, Peter Chelsom, and the screenwriter, Audrey Wells, haven't given them more to do. </p><p>In this remake of the 1997 Japanese film of the same name, Wells substitutes shtick for character -- an aging dance instructor secretly nips from a flask, a brash blond student wears tight outfits and instructs all the men to stop looking at her ass, and so on. So the flashes of charm we get from performers like Bobby Cannavale, Omar Miller, Richard Jenkins and the R&B singer Mya (whose lips and eyebrows curl like a cartoon kitty-cat's) have to suffice. There's just enough of Stanley Tucci as a lawyer who, with false teeth, flowing toupee and sequined clothes, moonlights as lord of the Latin dance, and too much of Lisa Ann Walter as that blond dance student -- she's abrasive where she intends to be brassy. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/10/15/dance_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/10/15/dance_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/11/07/fri_23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/11/07/fri_23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2003/11/07/fri</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was Princess Di a groupie? Did Prince Charles do something that could bring down the monarchy? And what does Hugh Grant have to say about puke? Plus: J.D. Salinger is mad at the BBC!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's all about the Brits today ... </p><p> <b>Princess Diana</b> may be in heaven, but they're still arguing about her on earth. Last week her butler revealed a letter from Di predicting her own death. This week it's <b>Bryan Adams</b>' ex-girlfriend saying he had an affair with the princess after the divorce from <b>Prince Charles</b>. The butler, of course, figures into this story too. Even though Adams denies the story, <b>Paul Burrell</b> has claimed that, after her divorce, Diana had nine suitors -- including "a Hollywood actor, a novelist, a sportsman, a politician, a lawyer, an entrepreneur, a billionaire, a surgeon -- and a musician." What, no Indian chief? <a target="new" href="http://www.imdb.com/PeopleNews//#8">(IMDB)</a> </p><p>And, speaking of Chuck, the whole of his empire are on the edge of their seats awaiting word of what he supposedly didn't do. For weeks now, British newspapers have been saying they have a story that could "bring the monarchy down" but they're bunkered with their lawyers on what they can and can't print, due to tough libel laws. The Daily Mail was going to go to press this week with a story based on testimony from an ex-servant and was stopped by a lawsuit by another former servant. Last night, Charles sent his private secretary out to deliver a denial: "I just want to make it entirely clear, even though I can't refer to the specifics of the allegation, that it's totally untrue and without a shred of substance" -- anticipating a Sunday story in the Mail. Could this be more "Upstairs, Downstairs"? <a target="new" href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/990520.asp?0cv=CB20">(MSNBC)</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/11/07/fri_23/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/11/07/fri_23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desperately seeking Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/01/seeking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/01/seeking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2003/10/01/seeking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon, that is. And Sigourney Weaver and Jessica Lange and Debra Winger and the rest of the '80s Hollywood stars who are so much sexier than the bottle-blond Sarahs and Gwyneths and Camerons of today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If life were fair, <a href="/directory/topics/sarah_jessica_parker/">Sarah Jessica Parker,</a> <a href="/directory/topics/sarah_michelle_gellar/">Sarah Michelle Gellar</a> and every other three-named Sarah guilty of snuffing out what's left of Hollywood's erotic sparkle would be delivered back to the bleach-bottled homecoming queen contests they came from. Then real actresses could return to movie screens so audiences could have what they crave -- good old sexual oomph. </p><p> If it weren't for their different shades of hair color and lip gloss, could anyone really tell the difference between <a href="/directory/topics/cameron_diaz/">Cameron Diaz</a> and Kate Hudson, with their big goofy-gal grins? <a href="/directory/topics/jennifer_aniston/">Jennifer Aniston</a> may be a tasteful clotheshorse and a charmer on "Friends," but, along with her sunglass wearing, waif-boy husband, her real personality seems as textured as a bottle of Wite-Out. And <a href="/directory/topics/gwyneth_paltrow/">Gwyneth</a>? Get rid of the whimpering and the sham English trill and all you've got is a cheerleader who smokes. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/10/01/seeking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/01/seeking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/07/fix_wed_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/07/fix_wed_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Couric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2003/05/07/fix_wed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eddie and Christy are the cutest, Bobby De Niro is the hairiest, and David and Victoria Beckham are the horniest. Plus: A romantic comedy about SARS?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like we can use a pen in our calendar books for this one -- the wedding of <b>Ed Burns</b> and <b>Christy Turlington</b> that had been planned for October 2001 and was canceled after 9/11 is now said to be on for this June. Is there a cuter couple on campus? We think not. <a target="new" href="http://www.nypost.com/gossip/35165.htm">(Page Six)</a> </p><p>Speaking of cute, we love, love, love <b>Robert De Niro</b> but we hope he loses the long, long goatee (or whatever it is) on that chinny chin chin. He told <b>Katie Couric</b> on "The Today Show" this morning that he grew it for a role, and she wondered if he kept his keys in there. He sort of chuckled. Bobby is doing interviews to promote the second year of his TriBeCa Film Festival, which is drawing crowds -- and needed bucks -- to downtown New York. Bravissimo, Roberto. Now go grab a Gillette, babe. <a target="new" href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=794&amp;ncid=799&amp;e=16&amp;u=/eo/20030502/en_movies_eo/11717">(Yahoo)</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/05/07/fix_wed_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/07/fix_wed_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/24/fix_thur_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/24/fix_thur_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2003/04/24/fix_thur</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanley Tucci and Edie Falco go dancing, journos loot Saddam, and Twisted Sister go USO. Plus: O.J. says no to reality show!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Baseball Hall of Fame won't have 'em over, <b>Bob Costas</b> will. <b>Susan Sarandon</b> and <b>Tim Robbins</b>, stars of "Bull Durham," were shunned by the Famers for being too political, but Costas will host them on the return of his HBO show "On the Record With Bob Costas" May 2. That should be better, anyway. Costas -- unlike the hall's president, <b>Dale Petroskey</b> -- gets it. <a target="new" href="http://tv.zap2it.com/news/tvnewsdaily.html?31173">(Zap2it)</a> </p><p>We had heard that <b>Stanley Tucci</b> and <b>Edie Falco</b> might be an item, but hesitated to go with it. But now that they've been spotted dancing together at Tuesday's PEN America Center Gala in New York, we think it might be true. Other couples cutting the rug were <b>Salman Rushdie</b> and his wife, <b>Padma Lakshmi</b>, and <b>Candace Bushnell</b> and <b>Charles Askegard</b>. Also there to lend support to writers were <b>Madeleine Albright</b> and <b>Jonathan Franzen</b>, but we don't know if they danced together. <a target="new" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/78044p-71957c.html">(N.Y. Daily News)</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/24/fix_thur_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/24/fix_thur_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The tyrant of Cooperstown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/11/cooperstown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/11/cooperstown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/kaufman/2003/04/11/cooperstown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Republican hack who   runs baseball's Hall of   Fame censors "Bull Durham's" Susan Sarandon and Tim   Robbins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not mad at Augusta National chairman Hootie Johnson for being a pigheaded boob in his refusal to admit women as members of the golf club that hosts the Masters Tournament. I'm mad at him for making me have to think about golf. </p><p>Dale Petroskey, though, the president of the Baseball Hall of Fame and a longtime Republican Party hack, I'm mad at for being a pigheaded boob. </p><p>Petroskey this week canceled a planned celebration of the 15th anniversary of the baseball flick "Bull Durham" because two of its stars, Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon, have spoken out against the war in Iraq and President Bush. "In a free country such as ours, every American has the right to his or her own opinions, and to express them," Petroskey wrote in a letter to would-be participants quoted by the Associated Press. "Public figures, such as you, have platforms much larger than the average American's, which provides you an extraordinary opportunity to have your views heard -- and an equally large obligation to act and speak responsibly." </p><p>Translation: Hey, I believe in free speech as much as the next guy, as long as the person speaking agrees with me. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/11/cooperstown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/11/cooperstown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/10/fix_thu_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/10/fix_thu_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2003/04/10/fix_thu</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alec Baldwin rants, Sean Penn smokes, Nicole Kidman holds hands, and Rush Limbaugh makes things up! Plus: Could Meg Ryan be in love?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An eclectic group of glitterati gathered at the Film Centre in San Francisco's Presidio Wednesday evening to talk about "Freedom of the Press During Wartime." The star quotient was high, with "Sopranos" bad guy <b>Joe Pantoliano</b> introducing <b>Peter Coyote</b> who introduced <b>Ron Reagan Jr.</b> who introduced the panel including <b>Norm Ornstein</b>, <b>Michael Medved</b>, <b>Tom Hayden</b> and <b>Alec Baldwin</b>. <b>Sean Penn</b> lurked in the back of the room, ducking out for an occasional smoke, and also ducking a reporter's questions. The brawling Baldwin boy had fire in his belly and sounded like someone who might be running for office in the near future. When Reagan asked why 70 percent of Americans think that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11, Alec said, "They get the idea from fascist news organizations like Fox!" Hayden agreed that "there has been an invasion of the media by people with a vested interest in victory," observing that the airwaves have been filled with generals and national security types, but no antiwar dissenters. When the subject of celebs speaking out politically came up, Baldwin bristled ("When artists make statements people want them to shut up and go away" -- but they never complain when the true powers in the communications industry, corporate moguls like Rupert Murdoch, exert their influence). Perhaps the most surprising moment of the night came when conservative media critic Medved, referring to Penn's trip to Iraq before the war, called the actor an "unwitting tool of propaganda" and Sean didn't deck him! </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/10/fix_thu_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/10/fix_thu_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/28/fix_fri_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/28/fix_fri_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2003/03/28/fix_fri</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Rock threatens Drudge, Madonna's feelings are hurt and Jon Stewart uses dirty words. Plus: Lisa Marie regrets marrying Michael!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Chris Rock</b> says that he "never had any intention of bashing President Bush" while promoting his film <a href="/ent/movies/review/2003/03/28/head_state/index.html">"Head of State."</a> He says if he were to meet the perpetrator of the report, <b>Matt Drudge</b>, he would "take my red-blooded American foot and put it up his un-American backside" for trying to disrupt the film's opening. A DreamWorks spokesman denied anyone has tried to muzzle Rock. OK, P.R. campaign done. Now let's see if the movie's any good. <a target="new" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40126-2003Mar27.html">(Washington Post)</a> </p><p>Tampa Bay says "No Thanks" to <b>Susan Sarandon</b>. The peace-loving Susan was to be the keynote speaker at a United Way women's leadership event but after they got "three dozen" complaints about Sarandon's views on the war, the plug was pulled. The theme of the event? "The role of women as leaders and contributors." <a target="new" href="http://www.sptimes.com/2003/03/27/TampaBay/Charity_calls_off_eve.shtml">(St. Petersburg Times)</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/28/fix_fri_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/28/fix_fri_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/18/fix_tues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/18/fix_tues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2003/03/18/fix_tues</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Moore has bird envy, Mario and Moby called hawks, and Susan Sarandon finds out her mom is a Republican!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Michael Moore</b>, whom the <a target="new" href="http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm">NY Post</a> whimsically calls a "wide-bottomed windbag," is pissed at a documentary about birds. He's claiming that Sony Pictures Classics is limiting the screenings of "Winged Migration" (its entry at the Academy Awards) so that fewer members can vote (the rule says you can't vote in the category unless you've seen all the nominated films). This, says Moore, will favor Sony's film over his own documentary <a href="/ent/movies/feature/2002/10/10/moore_columbine/index.html">"Bowling for Columbine."</a> </p><p>In other Michael Moore news, <b>System of a Down's</b> antiwar video for "Boom!" will premiere tonight on MTV2. The video features footage of war protests in London in February and is directed by the wide-bottomed one himself. <a href="http://www.nme.com/news/104513.htm">(NME)</a> </p><p>Poor <b>Susan Sarandon</b> ... it seems her mom is a Republican! The feisty 79-year-old told guests at her St. Patrick's Day party that she voted for <b>George W. Bush</b> and that "I simply agree with most everything he has said." We think that Thanksgiving at Mom's house with Susan and Tim and the gang would make a good documentary. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42317-2003Mar17.html">(Washington Post)</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/18/fix_tues/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/18/fix_tues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-absorbed and silent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/28/sports_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/28/sports_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/kaufman/2003/02/28/sports_war</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You'd think that a few thousand wealthy 20-somethings would have opinions on the looming war. Not in professional sports, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sports is entertainment, but sports celebrities are a different breed from their showbiz cousins. Case in point: <a href="/news/feature/2003/01/13/iraq/index.html">Movie and TV stars</a> are nearly ubiquitous in the debate over a coming war with Iraq. Just this week Janeane Garofalo, Mike Farrell and Susan Sarandon shared their views with America on the Sunday talk shows. </p><p>Meanwhile, a Division III women's basketball player in suburban New York has <a target="new" href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/womensbasketball/2003-02-25-flag-protest_x.htm">made national news</a> just by expressing an opinion. Part of the news was how Toni Smith expresses herself -- by turning away from the American flag during the national anthem -- and how people have <a target="new" href="http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/letters/69309.htm">responded,</a> by filling gyms for her games and chanting "Leave our country!" at her, for example. But the shocking thing, the real story here, is that an athlete, somewhere in America, has spoken out about politics, however innocuously. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/02/28/sports_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/28/sports_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just don&#8217;t call her an addict</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/04/npwed_112/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/04/npwed_112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Clooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitney Houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Sarandon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/col/reit/2002/12/04/npwed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whitney and Bobby are hooked on everything; Van Damme  talks about his cracked nuts. Plus: The return of Chuck Woolery -- he'll be back in two minutes, and two seconds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, her name is <b>Whitney Houston</b> and she has, "at times," been "addicted to a few things" like booze, pot, coke, pills and even sex -- or, as she prefers to put it, "making love." </p><p>Did she leave anything out? </p><p>And while on the topic of semantics, the distressed diva tells <b>Diane Sawyer</b> in a "Primetime" interview airing Wednesday night, she really doesn't care for the a-word. </p><p>"I don't like to think of myself addicted," she says. "I like to think ... I had a bad habit ... which can be broken." </p><p>But food, she insists, is not an issue for her. All that eating-disorder talk that surrounded her in the wake of 9/11 is just a gross overreaction to her naturally slender physique. </p><p>"Let's get that straight. I am not sick. OK?" Houston says. "I've always been a thin girl. I am not going to be fat, ever. Let's get that straight. Whitney is not going to be fat, ever." </p><p>But Whitney might be married to a man with even bigger problems than she herself has. </p><p><b>Bobby Brown</b> claims his marijuana use, while frequent, is strictly for medicinal purposes: It helps him with his bipolar disorder. </p><p>"Me and drugs. We're not friends. We're not friends at all," Brown tells Sawyer. "I'm a very high-strung person ... [Marijuana] seems to help me ... from going up and down." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/04/npwed_112/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/04/npwed_112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
