<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Syria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/syria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Poet takes revolution from Facebook to the world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/poet_takes_revolution_from_facebook_to_the_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/poet_takes_revolution_from_facebook_to_the_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maram Al-Masri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The Internet is the only way that I have to connect to my people and my family now,” says poet Maram Al-Masri]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The official media is so ignorant about what happens in Syria,” says poet Maram Al-Masri. “Civilians are in a very bad situation.” Her goal for her most recent collection, published in May, is to bring what Syrians are saying on social media to the world, even as the nation plunges deeper into chaos.</p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"> Since January 2013 the UNHCR has registered almost 1 million Syrian refugees – an average of 250,000 people each month. Officials acknowledge that the real number of refugees is probably much higher. In addition, more than 4 million people have been internally displaced. According to the CIA World Factbook, Syria’s population is around 22 million people, meaning nearly 30 percent of Syrians have been displaced by the current violence. “I’m working in my poetry to tell the truth about my people” says Al-Masri. “The outsiders are stealing the revolution from Syrians. Hezbollah and foreign extremists are getting involved. I want the international community to give my people medicine and milk, help them survive. What can poetry do in front of all this murder? If the poet doesn’t speak, who will do it? Poetry is about freedom; it has always been about freedom.” </span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/poet_takes_revolution_from_facebook_to_the_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/poet_takes_revolution_from_facebook_to_the_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives to Hillary: OK, but please no Lanny Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The left seems largely happy with Hillary now, because she can beat Republicans. Just please no wars or Mark Penn!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/netroots-nation-2013-hillary-clinton-93192.html" target="_blank">story this weekend</a> on Politico about the feelings progressives have toward Hillary Clinton, titled "Progressives at Netroots Nation 2013: Hillary Clinton must win us over." Within it, the "more than two dozen" attendees interviewed offer some hesitations about going with another Clinton in 2016 and her still-hawkish foreign policy. But as the author of the piece admits, "the backing of progressives appears to be Clinton’s to lose."</p><p>Another NBC News <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/22/19092548-liberal-activists-warm-to-hillary-clinton-for-president" target="_blank">story on precisely the same topic</a> comes away with a similar conclusion: "progressives are ready to give her another shot."</p><p>Progressives are basically fine with Hillary Clinton taking the 2016 nomination. There! Settled.</p><p>And why shouldn't they be? As Markos Moulitsas puts it, “The fact that she makes 2016 uninteresting makes that attractive." Yeah, that's about all you need, too. She would win. And you know who's a good nominee to go with, in general, in politics? The one who would <em>win the election</em>. Progressives overall might prefer, say, an Elizabeth Warren or Martin O'Malley for the nominee, but they likely won't run if Hillary Clinton runs, so whatever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN: Global refugee crisis worst in decades</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/un_global_refugee_crisis_worst_in_decades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/un_global_refugee_crisis_worst_in_decades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNHCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refugee crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Republic of Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displaced peoples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number of displaced people tops 45 million with due largely to conflicts in Syria, DRC and Mali]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the UNHCR's latest global trends report, we are currently in the midst of the worst global refugee crisis in 20 years, with over 45 million currently displaced people recorded. This includes 15.4 million refugees, 937,000 asylum seekers, and 28.8 millioninternally displaced people.</p><p>The report points to longterm conflicts in Mali, Syria and the Democratic Republic of Congo as contributing heavily to the number of displaced peoples. António Guterres, UN high commissioner for refugees and head of UNHCR, said "These truly are alarming numbers. They reflect individual suffering on a huge scale and they reflect the difficulties of the international community in preventing conflicts and promoting timely solutions for them." The Guardian reported:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/un_global_refugee_crisis_worst_in_decades/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/un_global_refugee_crisis_worst_in_decades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama mum on US arms to Syrian rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/obama_mum_on_us_arms_to_syrian_rebels_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/obama_mum_on_us_arms_to_syrian_rebels_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ireland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president praised the G-8 plan to seek a negotiated peace, but offered no clues as to his course of action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BERLIN (AP) — President Barack Obama is refusing to describe the type of military support the U.S. will give to Syrian rebels even as he praises a decision by world leaders at a just-completed summit to seek a negotiated peace.</p><p>Obama says even though leaders could not agree on whether Syrian President Bashar Assad must go, he has decided it is not possible for Assad to regain legitimacy.</p><p>Obama spoke at a joint press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel (AHN'-geh-lah MEHR'-kuhl).</p><p>Obama, Russian President Vladimir Putin and other leaders of the Group of Eight industrial economies meeting in Northern Ireland this week tried to narrow sharp differences between Russia, a key Assad backer, and Western leaders.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/obama_mum_on_us_arms_to_syrian_rebels_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/obama_mum_on_us_arms_to_syrian_rebels_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama on surveillance: I&#8217;m not Dick Cheney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/obama_on_surveillance_im_not_dick_cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/obama_on_surveillance_im_not_dick_cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President defended the NSA surveillance program in an interview with Charlie Rose]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday night, President Obama sat down for almost an hour with PBS's Charlie Rose to defend the NSA's surveillance program - and to defend himself from charges that when it comes to civil liberties, he's no different than Dick Cheney.</p><p>“Some people say, ‘Well, you know, Obama was this raving liberal before. Now he’s, you know, Dick Cheney.’ Dick Cheney sometimes says, ‘Yeah, you know? He took [Bush-Cheney policies] all lock, stock and barrel,'” Obama said. "My concern has always been not that we shouldn’t do intelligence gathering to prevent terrorism, but rather are we setting up a system of checks and balances.”</p><p>He continued to defend the NSA's phone surveillance program, by contending that the agency is not listening to Americans' phone calls. "The way I view it, my job is both to protect the American people and to protect the American way of life, which includes our privacy. And so every program that we engage in, what I’ve said is 'Let’s examine and make sure that we’re making the right tradeoffs.'” Obama continued: "What I can say unequivocally is that if you are a U.S. person, the NSA cannot listen to your telephone calls, and the NSA cannot target your emails … and have not."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/obama_on_surveillance_im_not_dick_cheney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/obama_on_surveillance_im_not_dick_cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syrian warplanes hit rebels near military base</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/syrian_warplanes_hit_rebels_near_military_base_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/syrian_warplanes_hit_rebels_near_military_base_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assad's forces are also waging an offensive against opposition fighters in Aleppo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEIRUT (AP) — Syrian warplanes bombed rebel positions near a contested military air base in the north on Tuesday, activists said, while President Bashar Assad's forces nearby pressed ahead with an offensive against opposition fighters in the country's largest city Aleppo.</p><p>The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that fighter jets struck near the Kweiras air base near the Turkish border early Tuesday. Opposition forces fighting to oust Assad's regime for more than two years have been trying for months to take Kweiras and two other military air bases nearby.</p><p>Assad's regime has relied heavily in the past year on its air force to neutralize the opposition's territorial gains. In the last year, rebels have been able to capture much of the area near the Turkish border, several districts in Aleppo, the whole city of Raqqa and even dams on the River Euphrates. But they have had difficulty running these areas effectively because of the threat of attack from the air.</p><p>The Observatory, which relies on a network of informants inside Syria, also reported heavy clashes in Aleppo, the country's commercial hub.</p><p>There were no reports of casualties in either the strikes or the fighting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/syrian_warplanes_hit_rebels_near_military_base_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/syrian_warplanes_hit_rebels_near_military_base_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pic of the day: No fun</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/pic_of_the_day_no_fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/pic_of_the_day_no_fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pic of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8 Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama and Putin looked palpably tense as the G8 pondered the Syrian conflict]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Group of Eight gathered in Northern Ireland on Monday for the 39th annual summit, where the Syrian conflict topped the agenda. This pic, from Reuters, captured the mood:</p><p>[embedtweet id="346738655546716160"] </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/pic_of_the_day_no_fun/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/pic_of_the_day_no_fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll shows most Americans oppose arming Syrian rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/poll_shows_most_americans_oppose_arming_syrian_rebels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/poll_shows_most_americans_oppose_arming_syrian_rebels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Research Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pew Research finds that 70 percent are against Obama's decision to send military supplies to Syria]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll by <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/06/17/public-remains-opposed-to-arming-syrian-rebels/">Pew Research</a> shows that 70 percent of Americans oppose the Obama administration's recent decision to send some military aid to the Syrian rebels, with only 20 percent supporting it.</p><p>From Pew:</p><blockquote><p>The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center, conducted June 12-16 among 1,512 adults, finds a major factor in overall attitudes about Syria is the impression that the U.S. military is already stretched thin. About two-thirds (68%) say the U.S. is too overcommitted to get involved in another conflict, and just 27% disagree. The public also has questions about the opposition groups in Syria: 60% say that they may be no better than the current government.</p> <p>At the same time, the public does not reject a key argument for involvement in Syria: by a 53%-36% margin, most agree that it is important for the U.S. to support people who oppose authoritarian regimes.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/poll_shows_most_americans_oppose_arming_syrian_rebels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/poll_shows_most_americans_oppose_arming_syrian_rebels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack and Bill on Syria: What&#8217;s really happening</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/barack_and_bill_on_syria_whats_really_happening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/barack_and_bill_on_syria_whats_really_happening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bosnia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanitarian aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To understand the current Democratic president’s predicament, consider the last one’s experiences -- and commentary]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the most popular Democratic president since FDR takes a swipe at a sitting president of the same party, pay attention. Barack Obama’s recent decision to start arming the Syrian opposition was driven by many factors, and conceived well before Bill Clinton implicitly accused him of being a <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/13/bill-clinton-obama-may-look-like-a-wuss-over-syria.html">”wuss” on Syria</a>. Clinton didn’t turn a risk-averse president into a risk-ready one on Syria -- how Obama wants to be remembered as a president did.</p><p>And that’s why the substance and timing of Clinton’s remarks matter.</p><p>Indeed, given the limited supply of weapons the administration is prepared to provide the rebels, Obama’s change of heart isn’t about overthrowing Assad or jumping militarily into Syria with both feet; it’s about protecting his own credibility, reputation and legacy in a second and final term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/barack_and_bill_on_syria_whats_really_happening/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/barack_and_bill_on_syria_whats_really_happening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin on Syria: &#8220;Let Allah sort it out&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sarah_palin_on_syria_let_allah_sort_it_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sarah_palin_on_syria_let_allah_sort_it_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Palin was objecting to Obama's decision to send arms to the rebels]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Faith and Freedom Conference in Washington, D.C., Sarah Palin objected to President Obama's decision to send arms to the Syrians rebels, instead suggesting that the U.S. should "let Allah sort it out."</p><p>"Militarily, where is our commander in chief?" she asked. "We’re talking now more new interventions. I say, until we know what we’re doing, until we have a commander and chief who knows what he’s doing, well, in these radical Islamic countries, who aren’t even respecting basic human rights, where both sides are slaughtering each other as they scream over an arbitrary red line, ‘Allah Akbar,’ I say until we have someone who knows what they’re doing, I say let Allah sort it out."</p><p>Here's video of Palin's full remarks. The Syria comments come in around the 7:35 mark:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WMR1GTDVlXk" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sarah_palin_on_syria_let_allah_sort_it_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sarah_palin_on_syria_let_allah_sort_it_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What you should know about developing Syria situation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conventional wisdom is over-hyping recent events, and gets U.S. strategy wrong. Here's what's really happening]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thursday’s announcement by the White House that it would begin supplying Syria’s rebels with small arms and ammunition represents a modest shift in tactics and by itself doesn’t represent a major strategic shift in U.S. policy on Syria, contrary to the conventional wisdom.</p><p>The initial commentaries sparked by this public statement demonstrated a major shortcoming in our discussion on Syria for months – a heavy fixation on tactics or means to achieve objectives, without much reference to the overall strategy with all of its components. At times it seems as if a “no strategy” zone has been imposed on the U.S. policy debate on Syria.</p><p>The Obama administration’s overall cautious strategy on Syria – and yes, it does have a strategy – remains largely intact and unchanged in the broad contours. The key question isn’t whether the administration has a strategy. Instead, the most important questions are whether the administration’s Syria strategy is effective in advancing U.S. security interests and values -- and whether the full range of means the United States is willing to invest in will produce the outcomes it hopes to achieve.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President McCain declares war!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/president_mccain_declares_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/president_mccain_declares_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian civil war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following trip to meet rebels, 2008 election participant announces/demands U.S. intervention in Syria]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, President John McCain <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/dorsey/john-mccain-jumps-the-gun-by-announcing-that-obama-will-arm">announced that the United States would be intervening militarily in the current Syrian civil war.</a> Speaking on the Senate floor, as he often does despite his apparently being president, McCain announced what the president, him, had decided to do:</p><blockquote><p>“The president also will announce that we will be assisting the Syrian rebels by providing them with weapons and other assistance. I applaud the president’s decision.”</p></blockquote><p>Strangely, an administration official then told the Daily Beast's Josh Rogin that <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/13/obama-s-syria-aid-too-late.html">the U.S. wouldn't be arming the opposition.</a></p><blockquote><p>“The president has made a decision to provide the Syrian opposition with military items that can increase their effectiveness on the ground, but at this point it does not include things like guns and bullets,” the official tells The Daily Beast.</p></blockquote><p>Which is it? "Senator McCain heard that from reliable sources,” his spokesman told the Daily Beast. It appears that McCain was correct: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/world/middleeast/syria-chemical-weapons.html?hp&amp;_r=0">The U.S. will be supplying the Syrian opposition with small arms.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/president_mccain_declares_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/president_mccain_declares_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama boosts military aid to Syrian rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/obama_bolsters_military_aid_to_syrian_rebels_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/obama_bolsters_military_aid_to_syrian_rebels_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials announced Thursday they had conclusive evidence that Assad had crossed a "red line"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama's decision to authorize lethal aid to Syrian rebels marks a deepening of U.S. involvement in the two-year civil war. But U.S. officials are still grappling with what type and how much weaponry to send the opposition forces and how to ensure it stays out of the hands of extremists battling for control of Syria.</p><p>U.S. officials confirmed Obama's authorization Thursday after the White House announced it had conclusive evidence that Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime used chemical weapons against opposition forces. Obama has said the use of chemical weapons would cross a "red line," suggesting greater American intervention.</p><p>While a small percentage of the 93,000 people reportedly killed in Syria are said to have died from chemical weapons — U.S. intelligence puts the number at 100 to 150 — the White House views the deployment of the deadly agents as a flouting of international norms. Ben Rhodes, Obama's deputy national security adviser, said the multiple chemical weapons attacks gave greater urgency to the situation.</p><p>"Suffice it to say this is going to be different in both scope and scale in terms of what we are providing," Rhodes said of the ramped-up U.S. response. But he added that the U.S. would make specific determinations "on our own timeline."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/obama_bolsters_military_aid_to_syrian_rebels_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/obama_bolsters_military_aid_to_syrian_rebels_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US determines Syria crossed &#8220;red line&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama administration concludes Syrian regime used chemical weapons; hasn't decided how it will respond]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- U.S. officials say the Obama administration has concluded that Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime has used chemical weapons against the opposition seeking to overthrow him, crossing what President Barack Obama called a 'red line'.</p><p>However, the officials said the administration has not determined how it will respond.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN: Nearly 93,000 killed in Syrian conflict</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/un_nearly_93000_killed_in_syrian_conflict_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/un_nearly_93000_killed_in_syrian_conflict_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The international organization acknowledges that the true number is likely to be far higher]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GENEVA (AP) — Syria's upwardly spiraling violence has resulted in the confirmed killings of almost 93,000 people, the United Nations' human rights office said Thursday but acknowledged the real number is likely to be far higher.</p><p>A new analysis of the Syrian death toll documented 92,901 killings between March 2011 and the end of April 2013. But the U.N.'s top human rights official, Navi Pillay, who oversees the Geneva-based office, said it was impossible to provide an exact current figure.</p><p>The last such analysis, released in January, documented nearly 60,000 killings through the end of November. Since then, U.N. officials had estimated higher numbers. The latest figures add more confirmed killings to the previous time period, and find almost 27,000 more between December and April.</p><p>"The constant flow of killings continues at shockingly high levels, with more than 5,000 killings documented every month since last July," said Pillay, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights. "This is most likely a minimum casualty figure. The true number of those killed is potentially much higher."</p><p>Among the victims were at least 6,561 children, including 1,729 children younger than 10.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/un_nearly_93000_killed_in_syrian_conflict_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/un_nearly_93000_killed_in_syrian_conflict_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syrian army recaptures route into Israeli-held territory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/syrian_army_recaptures_crossing_into_israeli_held_territory_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/syrian_army_recaptures_crossing_into_israeli_held_territory_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golan Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Israeli officials, Syrian troops regained control of the Quneitra crossing from the rebels Thursday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a>A day after Syrian rebels <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/middle-east/syria/130605/whats-the-big-deal-about-qusayr" target="_blank">lost the strategic and symbolic town of Qusayr to the Syrian army</a>, they thought they had gained control of the Quneitra crossing into the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights Thursday.</p><p>Their victory, however, was short-lived as Israeli security sources said Syrian troops took back the crossing after heavy fighting.</p><p>Earlier, the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and a spokesman for the Austrian Defense Ministry reported that rebels had taken the crossing, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/06/06/uk-syria-crisis-golan-idUKBRE9550A020130606" target="_blank">according to Reuters</a>.</p><p>Israeli citizens have been <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Defense/IDF-confirms-rebels-rout-Assads-forces-in-Quneitra-315631" target="_blank">ordered to stay away from the border fence</a> area by authorities as fighting continues in the UN-patrolled demilitarized zone. The crossing is normally operated by the UN Disengagement Observer Force.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/syrian_army_recaptures_crossing_into_israeli_held_territory_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/syrian_army_recaptures_crossing_into_israeli_held_territory_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syrian army announces capture of strategic town</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/syrian_army_announces_capture_of_strategic_town_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/syrian_army_announces_capture_of_strategic_town_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damascus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The town, which lies close to the Lebanese border, solidifies some of the regime's recent gains on the ground]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — The Syrian army triumphantly announced Wednesday the capture of a strategic town near the Lebanese border, telling the nation it has "cleansed" the rebel-held Qusair of "terrorists" fighting President Bashar Assad's troops.</p><p>The capture of the town, which lies close to the Lebanese border, solidifies some of the regime's recent gains on the ground that have shifted the balance of power in Assad's favor in the Syrian civil war.</p><p>It comes just a day after France and Britain made back-to-back announcements that the nerve gas sarin was used in Syria's conflict. A U.N. probe, also released Tuesday, said it had "reasonable grounds" to suspect small-scale use of toxic chemicals in at least four attacks in March and April in Syria.</p><p>The statements — which included a confirmed case of the Syrian regime using sarin — leave many questions unanswered, however, because the probes were mostly carried out from outside Syria from samples collected by doctors and journalists.</p><p>On the ground in the past two months, the Syrian army has moved steadily against rebels in key battleground areas, making advances near the border with Lebanon and considerably lowering the threat to Damascus, the seat of Assad's government. A wide offensive on Qusair was launched on May 19.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/syrian_army_announces_capture_of_strategic_town_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/syrian_army_announces_capture_of_strategic_town_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN wants more evidence on Syrian chemical weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/un_wants_more_evidence_on_syria_chemical_weapons_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/un_wants_more_evidence_on_syria_chemical_weapons_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ban Ki-Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report reveals there's "reasonable grounds" to believe they've been used, but by whom remains unclear]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEIRUT (AP) — A U.N. report on Syria said Tuesday there are "reasonable grounds" to believe that limited quantities of toxic chemicals have been used as weapons in at least four attacks in Syria's civil war, but said more evidence is needed to determine the precise chemical agents used or who used them.</p><p>The U.N. Commission of Inquiry said conclusive findings can be reached only after testing samples taken directly from victims or the site of the alleged attacks. It called on Damascus to allow a team of experts into the country.</p><p>President Barack Obama has said repeatedly that Syria's use of chemical weapons, or the transfer of its stockpiles to a terrorist group, would cross a "red line." Tuesday's report appeared to strengthen U.S. officials' assertions that more definitive proof was needed.</p><p>The commission's report to the Human Rights Council on violations in Syria's conflict accused both sides of committing war crimes. In an apparent message to European countries considering arming Syrian rebels, the report warned that the transfer of arms would heighten the risk of violations, leading to more civilian deaths and injuries.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/un_wants_more_evidence_on_syria_chemical_weapons_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/un_wants_more_evidence_on_syria_chemical_weapons_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watching the Sunday shows so you don&#8217;t have to</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The experts of Meet the Press, Face the Nation and This Week solve the Syria, Holder and IRS crises in mere minutes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to this week's Funday Shows recap, a look at all the hot chatter on NBC's <em>Meet the Press</em>, CBS's <em>Face the Nation</em>, and ABC's <em>This Week. </em>The topics under discussion this week include: Is Eric Holder the worst human being in history? Has he killed off any remaining semblance of Freedom of the Press in this country? Why aren't we bombing Syria yet? Are IRS employees dancing too much, and are we not going out of our way to humiliate them enough?</p><p>"SUNDAY SHOWDOWN!" George Stephanopoulos greets us, to open <em>This Week</em>. It's a political consultant versus another political consultant! Whose talking points will win? "Let's get right to it" with David Plouffe versus Karl Rove, before you even have time to run to the bathroom. Arianna Huffington, Gwen Ifill and the WSJ editorial page's Paul Gigot watch from the other side of the table.</p><p>Stephanopoulos shows poll numbers that indicate the public doesn't especially care about any of The Scandals, today's hot lead. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/30/poll-americans-want-special-prosecutor-for-irs-scandal/" target="_blank">Forty-four percent</a> find the IRS targeting scandal the most important, however. And Karl Rove says if you look "inside the numbers," the public is still very unhappy with the economy. And the IRS collects taxes from the <em>economy</em>, so there you go: biggest scandal ever, searingly pertinent to all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria takes down Syrian Electronic Army</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/syria_takes_down_syrian_electronic_army_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/syria_takes_down_syrian_electronic_army_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syrian Electronic Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syrian Computer Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Down Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The organization that regulates the country's domain names has stopped hosting SEA's websites on its servers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Syrian Electronic Army, that mysterious group of hackers that briefly tanked the Dow Jones by hijacking a Twitter account, has seemingly been cut off by its government.</p><p dir="ltr">The <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/society/syrian-electronic-army-twitter-hack-interview/">unabashedly pro-government SEA</a> announced Thursday evening that the Syrian Computer Society (SCS), which regulates Syria's domain names and <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/news/syria-internet-down-blacked-out/">possibly shuts off the country's connectivity</a> entirely in times of duress, had severed ties with the hacker group.</p><p dir="ltr">"SCS stopped our website hosting on its servers," one member of the SEA told the Daily Dot.</p><p dir="ltr">The Syrian government, currently embroiled in a civil war with rebels, has long maintained an unclear alliance with the SEA. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad once headed the SCS, who provided some of the SEA's early members, and Assad previously had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/18/technology/financial-times-site-is-hacked.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">referred</a> to the SEA as "a real army in a virtual reality.” But, save the those references and fact that the country had granted the hackers a .sy domain name—a top-level domain exclusively issued by the SCS— there wasn't an explicit connection between the SEA and Assad's regime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/syria_takes_down_syrian_electronic_army_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/syria_takes_down_syrian_electronic_army_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>