<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > taken 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/taken_3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The worst movie sequel titles of all time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taken 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taken 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad movie titles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eye-roll-worthy titles like "The Last Exorcism Part II" and "I'll Always Know What You Did Last Summer" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/producers_on_making_taken_3_weve_taken_everyone_we_can_take/">better judgment</a>, Liam Neeson has signed on for "Taken 3," the third movie in the spy/kidnap action thriller series. Although producers promise that because “We’ve taken everyone we can take -- it’s going to go in another direction," it's hard to imagine that the movie will maintain its box office appeal. That said, "Taken 3" is only the latest in a rich tradition of bad or poorly titles sequels:</p><p><strong>"Aliens" -- 1986, sequel to "Alien"</strong><br /> The title of James Cameron's follow-up to the Ridley Scott sci-fi film basically says, "if you liked 'Alien,' you'll like 'Aliens' ... because there are more of them."</p><p><strong>The Last Exorcism Part II -- 2013, sequel to "The Last Exorcism"</strong><br /> So ... not the Last Exorcism, then?</p><p><strong>"<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/arnold_schwarzenegger_confirms_return_as_the_terminator/">Triplets</a>" -- upcoming, sequel to 1988 comedy "Twins"</strong><br /> <strong></strong>Here's the rare case where "Twins 2" would have been a better title. Instead, "Triplets," as the title implies, makes the already improbable sibling duo of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DeVito even less plausible, adding Eddie Murphy into the genetic mix.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Producers on making &#8220;Taken 3&#8243;: &#8220;We&#8217;ve taken everyone we can take&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/producers_on_making_taken_3_weve_taken_everyone_we_can_take/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/producers_on_making_taken_3_weve_taken_everyone_we_can_take/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taken 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taken 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liam Neeson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet meme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13035783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fans (and kidnappers) can't seem to get enough of Liam Neeson]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the massive, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/06/taken_2_and_the_spy_movie_problem/">unexpected</a> box office <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/taken_2_proves_to_be_a_box_office_hit/">success</a> of Liam Neeson action thriller "Taken 2," producer Luc Besson and writer Robert Mark Kamen implied that they might ride out the franchise's success a little longer: "We didn't start talking about [Taken 3] until we saw the numbers," said Kamen. "But then we said, 'Oh, okay. I think we should do a third one.' And Fox wants us to do a third one."</p><p><a href="http://www.hollywood.com/news/Taken_2_Interview_Taken_3_Bloodsport_Remake_Robert_Mark_Kamen/41970392">Hollywood.com</a> writes:</p><blockquote><p>In the first "Taken," Neeson's character Bryan Mills' daughter was taken. In "Taken 2," he and his wife were taken. In <em>"</em>Taken 3"…. "We've taken everyone we can take — it's going to go in another direction. Should be interesting."</p></blockquote><p>Liam Neeson realizes the comedy inherent in any "Taken 3": "How many times can she be taken?" he asked a few weeks ago. "I mean, it’s bad parenthood, really, after that."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/producers_on_making_taken_3_weve_taken_everyone_we_can_take/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/producers_on_making_taken_3_weve_taken_everyone_we_can_take/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>