<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s biggest sin: Popularity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish sandwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Dutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carl levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why was CEO Tim Cook standing trial for "crimes" all his peers have committed? Because everyone loves their iPhones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's causing me heartburn to admit this out loud, but when I saw the first tweet reporting Rand Paul's declaration that Congress was bullying Apple and forcing it to sit through a "show trial" -- as if CEO Tim Cook was a member of the Bolshevik old guard about to be purged by Joseph Stalin on bogus conspiracy charges -- I found myself inclined to agree with the Kentucky senator.</p><p>I don't condone <a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/20/how-to-make-30-billion-and-pay-no-corporate-income-tax-the-apple-way/">Apple's tax-avoidance schemes,</a> but the company is hardly alone in taking advantage of loopholes in U.S and Irish tax law. The Wikipedia page that details the two key strategies employed by Apple, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Irish_arrangement">the Double Irish and Dutch Sandwich,</a> lists 12 other major U.S. corporations that are pulling the same flim-flam. Among them are Apple's tech sector colleagues -- Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Facebook and Adobe Systems -- along with General Electric, Pfizer, Johnson &amp; Johnson and Starbucks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul: Congress should apologize to Apple, not the other way around</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/rand_paul_congress_should_apologize_to_apple_not_the_other_way_around/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/rand_paul_congress_should_apologize_to_apple_not_the_other_way_around/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a Tuesday hearing on Apple's tax avoidance strategies, Paul chastised Congress and gushed about Apple]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) berated Congress on Tuesday for "bullying" Apple, calling a committee hearing on the company's tax avoidance strategies a "theater of the absurd."</p><p>As many on Twitter have been quick to <a href="https://twitter.com/TheStalwart/status/336855735923249153" target="_blank">note</a> (some in <a href="https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/336875295749582848" target="_blank">total disbelief</a>, mind you), Paul is the very littlest bit right in his outrage: Apple isn't breaking any laws by sheltering a portion of its earnings in three empty subsidiaries in Ireland, a strategy that has allowed the company to dodge billions in corporate taxes since 2009.</p><p>If Congress is looking to place blame for Apple's legal maneuvering, Rand said, they should look in the mirror:</p><blockquote><p>If anyone should be on trial here, it should be Congress. I frankly think the committee should apologize to Apple. The Congress should be on trial here for creating a Byzantine and bizarre tax code.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/rand_paul_congress_should_apologize_to_apple_not_the_other_way_around/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/rand_paul_congress_should_apologize_to_apple_not_the_other_way_around/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a fight with Rick Santorum made an IRS commissioner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the little-told story of how Doug Shulman, who led the IRS when targeting occurred, unexpectedly got the job]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While President Obama fired IRS commissioner Steven Miller this week for failing to stop the enhanced scrutiny the IRS gave 501c4 applications with conservative missions, most of the activity happened under a man who was never supposed to get the job: Miller’s predecessor, Doug Shulman. Indeed, the little-known story of how Shulman was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007 stems from an unfortunate incident that derailed his party’s first choice for the spot.</p><p>One thing to keep in mind is that the president and his staff have literally thousands of posts to fill. A White House that doesn’t want to get bogged down will defer many of these lower-level appointments to politicians in his party who have some special interest or expertise in a position. The IRS commissioner is usually seen as a low-level position, since the commissioner merely enforces the law and has no ability to actually make law.</p><p>When it came time to replace the retiring IRS commissioner in 2007, Senator Charles Grassley, ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, offered up one of his senior staffers on the committee by the name of Dean Zerbe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 of the world&#8217;s weirdest taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/6_of_the_worlds_weirdest_taxes_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/6_of_the_worlds_weirdest_taxes_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Daniels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flavored vodka and toy-less cereal are just a couple of items singled out for special levies ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> As the old adage goes, there are only two certainties in life: death and taxes.</p><p>We at GlobalPost live by a third certainty: The world is a weird and wondrous place. However, we didn't realize until recently how much the promises of weirdness and taxes overlap.</p><p>From extra charges on flavored vodka in the US to beards in Russia, here are the top six wackiest taxes we've found around the world:</p><p><strong>1. Tax on smartphones and laptops in France</strong></p><p>French President Francois Hollande is <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/13/francois-hollande-tax-iphones-laptops?CMP=twt_gu">considering a tax on smartphones</a>, laptops and tablets to finance the country's celebrated <em>exception culturelle</em>, or "cultural exception," a precious French principle enshrined in law.</p><p>The exception essentially requires that anything considered to be of cultural value to French society must be protected from erratic market forces and the pernicious spread of non-French cultural items — namely, American and other English-language influences.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/6_of_the_worlds_weirdest_taxes_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/6_of_the_worlds_weirdest_taxes_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP bill would criminalize political discrimination at the IRS</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_bill_would_criminalize_political_discrimination_at_the_irs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_bill_would_criminalize_political_discrimination_at_the_irs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Mike Turner is introducing a bill that would make it a crime to discriminate based on political beliefs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Majority Leader Eric Cantor has already promised investigations and hearings on the IRS' targeting of conservative groups who had applied for tax-exempt status. Now, Rep. Mike Turner, a Republican from Ohio, has announced legislation making it a crime for the IRS to discriminate based on political beliefs.</p><p>The bill aims to "prevent discriminatory misconduct against taxpayers by Federal officers and employees" by making it a crime to scrutinize individuals or groups based on political beliefs or political expressions. Under the bill, the penalties would be a $5000 fine, up to five years in prison, or both.</p><p>IRS employees are already banned from this type of discrimination, but, at worst, they can only be fired.</p><p>“Americans of all political beliefs have been rightly outraged by the revelation of the IRS’ efforts to target certain political organizations," Turner said in a <a href="http://turner.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=333552">statement</a>. "The fact that this could occur with little to no corrective action against those who seek to silence their fellow citizens is unacceptable. That’s why I’m taking immediate action and introducing this bill."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_bill_would_criminalize_political_discrimination_at_the_irs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_bill_would_criminalize_political_discrimination_at_the_irs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports: IRS targeting was broader than just Tea Partyers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/reports_irs_targeting_was_broader_than_just_tea_partiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/reports_irs_targeting_was_broader_than_just_tea_partiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax-exempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The agency reportedly targeted conservative groups that criticized "how the country is being run" [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update - 12:03 p.m.: </strong>In a press conference on Monday, President Obama called it "outrageous" the IRS did not operate on a "non-partisan, neutral" basis, adding that people are "properly concerned." If the allegations are true, he said, “I’ve got no patience with it. I will not tolerate it."</p><p>In a statement earlier Monday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said that the President "is concerned that the conduct of a small number of Internal Revenue Service employees may have fallen short" of the Administration's standard of conduct, and that if any rules were broken, Obama "expects that swift and appropriate steps will be taken to address any misconduct.”</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>An inspector general's audit of the IRS, set to be released this week, will reportedly show that the agency targeted a wider range of conservative groups than just those with "tea party" and "patriot" in the name, including groups that were generally critical of the government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/reports_irs_targeting_was_broader_than_just_tea_partiers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/reports_irs_targeting_was_broader_than_just_tea_partiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 reasons why Obama should push for a carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even a minor tax would create jobs and federal revenue, not to mention help the environment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> We are at an unacknowledged turning point for the economy and the environment. We could, right now, substantially reduce our debt and deficit projections, take a major step toward a better environment, create a simpler and fairer tax system, make job creation easier, and raise economic growth a bit. For all of these reasons, we could and should adopt a carbon tax.</p><p>Taking this step depends on two men: President Obama and Senator Max Baucus, chair of the Senate Finance Committee. Both men want to leave an important legacy, and both are in a unique political position: they still possess real political power, but neither will ever face another election. (Obama, of course, is limited to two terms, and Baucus has just announced that he will retire.) Acting together, the two of them could completely change the odds of enacting a carbon tax this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the conservative revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost half of Republicans think an armed revolution may be needed soon. What does it mean for guns and democracy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's plenty of proof of an authoritarian streak and animus toward democratic ideals in today's conservative movement. There was the movement's use of its judicial power to halt a vote recount and instead <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/06/yes-bush-v-gore-did-steal-the-election.html">install</a> a president who had lost the popular vote. There is the ongoing GOP effort to make it <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830">more difficult for people to cast a vote in an election</a>. There is the GOP's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html">record use of the Senate filibuster</a> to kill legislation that the vast majority of the country supports. There is a GOP leader's declaration that what the American people want from their government simply <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2627805#.UYEaob8Ts18">"doesn't matter."</a></p><p>Up until today, you might have been able to write all that anti-democratic pathology off as one infecting only the Republican Party's politicians and institutional leadership, but not its rank-and-file voters. But then this morning Fairleigh Dickinson University released this gun control-related pollshowing that authoritarianism runs throughout the the entire party.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>280</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Day&#8217;s dirty secret: There&#8217;s no penalty for filing late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few taxpayers realize that you only have to pay a fee if you already owe back taxes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's a little secret for all you procrastinators on Tax Day: The Internal Revenue Service doesn't like to talk about it, but as long as you don't owe any additional taxes, there is no penalty for filing a few days late.</p><p>The late filing penalty is usually 5 percent of the unpaid taxes for each month — or part of a month — a return is late. That can add up quickly if you owe additional taxes. But what if the unpaid taxes are zero? Five percent of zero is ... zero!</p><p>However, if you wait more than three years to file, you forfeit your refund. So maybe it's better to file by Monday, after all. Besides, if you're getting a refund, why wait?</p><p>The IRS got a late start on tax season this year, thanks to a last-minute tax law passed by Congress on Jan. 1. But the deadline for filing returns didn't change, so if you owe money, it's time to settle up with the government.</p><p>In all, the IRS expects to process 149 million returns from individuals this year, including returns from people who file for 6-month extensions. About a quarter of returns are usually filed in the last three weeks before Tax Day. This year the IRS received more than 10 million electronically filed returns from Friday through Sunday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS may be reading emails without a warrant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/irs_may_be_reading_emails_without_a_warrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/irs_may_be_reading_emails_without_a_warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New FOIA'd documents suggest IRS is violating Fourth Amendment, says ACLU]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to catch instances of criminal tax evasion the IRS may be violating the Fourth Amendment, the ACLU reported Wednesday. The civil liberties group obtained documents via FOIA that suggest that the IRS is reading Americans' emails without warrants, although the agency remains cagey about its surveillance practices. <a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-national-security/new-documents-suggest-irs-reads-emails-without-warrant">Via the ACLU:</a></p><blockquote><p>Last year, the ACLU sent a FOIA <a href="http://www.aclu.org/national-security/warrantless-electronic-communications-search-foia-request-irs">request</a> to the IRS seeking records regarding whether it gets a warrant before reading people’s email, text messages and other private electronic communications. The IRS has now responded by sending us <a href="http://www.aclu.org/national-security/irs-response-warrantless-electronic-communications-foia-request">247 pages of records</a> describing the policies and practices of its criminal investigative arm when seeking the contents of emails and other electronic communications.</p> <p>So does the IRS always get a warrant? Unfortunately, while the documents we have obtained do not answer this question point blank, they suggest otherwise. This question is too important for the IRS not to be completely forthright with the American public. The IRS should tell the public whether it always gets a warrant to access email and other private communications in the course of criminal investigations. And if the agency does not get a warrant, it should change its policy to always require one.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/irs_may_be_reading_emails_without_a_warrant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/irs_may_be_reading_emails_without_a_warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kickstarter might get you audited</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kickstarter_just_might_get_you_audited_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kickstarter_just_might_get_you_audited_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kickstarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdfunding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few artists and entrepreneurs looking for crowdfunding realize the money they receive is taxable income]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailydot.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/dailydot_square-e1364842032669.png" alt="The Daily Dot" align="left" /></a><br /> “Crowdfunding isn’t a magic bullet,” Amanda Palmer once <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/entertainment/amanda-palmer-naked-authenticity-interview/">told the Daily Dot</a> in regards to her blockbuster $1.1 million Kickstarter campaign.</p><p>“You can’t crowdfund without a crowd, and you can’t start a project from scratch and get people interested in it. You need to have some degree of reach and some small starting point. You need someone to send that link to.”</p><p>Since launching in 2009, Kickstarter has gone from a last-ditch resort to the method of choice for artists looking to fund their next creative endeavor. The platform has revolutionized the entertainment industry, allowing artists to turn directly to their online audience for financial support and, in doing so, freeing them from the pressure and restraints often associated with major-label contracts. In the last two years alone, more than $55 million has been raised for roughly 8,000 music-related projects.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kickstarter_just_might_get_you_audited_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kickstarter_just_might_get_you_audited_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado considers huge legal weed tax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/colorado_considers_huge_legal_weed_tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/colorado_considers_huge_legal_weed_tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State lawmakers  consider possibility of taxing recreational marijuana at a rate near 40 percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxes on recreational marijuana legalized in Colorado could be so high that recreational users may continue to rely on illegal sales. As HuffPo <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/legal-weed-colorado-lawma_n_3036895.html">reported </a>Monday:</p><blockquote><p>The House-Senate committee, which will introduce a bill this week drafted from <a href="http://www.colorado.gov/cms/forms/dor-tax/A64TaskForceFinalReport.pdf" target="_hplink">the 58 recommendations that the pot task force issued</a> last month with taxes being one of several issues the committee is considering, would ask voters to approve a 15 percent excise tax and a 15 percent special sales tax. Those rates plus existing local and state tax rates -- for food and beverage sales in Denver, the the combined total tax rate is 8 percent -- could mean a total tax rate 0f 38 percent on marijuana purchases in the Denver area.</p> <p>Currently, medical marijuana is taxed like all food and beverage sales are and fluctuates from county to county, in Denver that rate is just 8 percent.</p></blockquote><p>The proposed Colorado taxes are markedly higher than the taxes placed on recreational marijuana in the only other legalization state -- Washington. At present, Washington state's Initiative 502 legalized small amounts of marijuana and marijuana products for people 21 and older and established a 25 percent excise tax on those products.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/colorado_considers_huge_legal_weed_tax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/colorado_considers_huge_legal_weed_tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When tax breaks are useless</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/when_tax_breaks_are_useless_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/when_tax_breaks_are_useless_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Interest Deduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Fischer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mortgage interest deduction, which costs the treasury $70 billion, subsidizes already-payable home purchases]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of people running around DC these days talking about closing tax loopholes.  But when you push them on specifics, most are hard pressed to say which ones.</p><p>Though I name names in recent <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=3916">testimony</a> on the topic, I’m sympathetic.  Your loophole is my treasured job-creation program without which the economy will collapse.</p><p>So we need some criteria by which to judge what should stay and what should go.  In the link above, I argue for a 3-step test involving revenue forgone, efficiency, and fairness.  Someone suggested adding political feasibility, which makes sense, though given the state of Congressional gridlock, that could shut down the whole enterprise.</p><p>Anyway, these thoughts came to mind when I saw the graph below from my CBPP colleague Will Fischer (here’s the <a href="http://www.offthechartsblog.org/its-time-to-fix-the-broken-mortgage-interest-tax-break/">post</a> from which I plucked it).  It’s about the mortgage interest deduction (MID), and to my eyes, it’s a picture of an expensive, inefficient, and unfair tax break.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/when_tax_breaks_are_useless_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/when_tax_breaks_are_useless_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Major corporations are pocketing your taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/major_corporations_are_pocketing_your_taxes_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/major_corporations_are_pocketing_your_taxes_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulitzer prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cay Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fine Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perfectly Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Lunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston explains how the economy is rigged to benefit the one percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Nobody has done more to expose the infinite ways in which the American economy is rigged to benefit those at the top than Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston. His rigorously researched books –<em>Perfectly Legal, Free Lunch</em> and now his latest, <em>The Fine Print,</em> are not recommended for people with egalitarian views and high blood pressure – they're every bit as maddening to contemplate as they are informative.</p><p>Last week, AlterNet caught up with Johnston by phone. Below is a lightly edited transcript of our discussion.</p><p><strong>Joshua Holland: David, for years you’ve reported how those who can afford the right accountants game this labyrinthian and opaque tax-code of ours. How surreal has it been for you to observe the amount of political conflict we've faced over the past few years over returning the top marginal rates to the same rate they were during the Clinton era -- taking them from 35 percent to 39 percent?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/major_corporations_are_pocketing_your_taxes_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/major_corporations_are_pocketing_your_taxes_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives and software companies will keep tax season miserable</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/conservatives_big_companies_lobbying_against_simple_free_tax_filing_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/conservatives_big_companies_lobbying_against_simple_free_tax_filing_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Return-free filing could save taxpayers billions, but the GOP and companies like TurboTax maker Intuit don't care]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a></p><p><em>This story was co-produced with <a href="http://www.npr.org/2013/03/26/175332655/what-would-the-u-s-be-like-with-no-tax-returns">NPR</a>.</em></p><p>Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.</p><div>It's already a reality in <a href="http://www.oecd.org/tax/taxadministration/36280368.pdf">Denmark, Sweden and Spain</a>. The government-prepared return would estimate your taxes using information your employer and bank already send it. Advocates say tens of millions of taxpayers could use such a system each year, saving them a collective $2 billion and 225 million hours in prep costs and time, according to one estimate.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/conservatives_big_companies_lobbying_against_simple_free_tax_filing_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/conservatives_big_companies_lobbying_against_simple_free_tax_filing_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defeating useless rich people</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makers vs. Takers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taming wealthy, unproductive "moochers" will require a populist campaign to stop them. Here's how we can do it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/private_sector_parasites/">previous</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/">columns</a>, I argued that left and right alike are confused by a failure to distinguish productive businesses that sell innovative goods and services from “rentier” interests — landlords, lenders, copyright holders and others — which use their natural or artificial monopoly power to extract excessive tolls, fees and other recurrent payments from the rest of society, including productive businesses. The fees or rents extracted by these interests constitute a kind of “private taxation” which — rather than public taxation — is the greatest threat facing America’s productive economy.</p><p>Today America’s powerful rentier interests, particularly those in the FIRE (finance, insurance and real estate) sector, are mobilizing campaign contributions and paid propaganda to promote what I called the Rentier Agenda: low taxes on those whose income is derived from capital gains; the privatization of public infrastructure and the deregulation of regulated private utilities, to generate windfall profits for investors in privatized or deregulated agencies; and a macroeconomic policy that serves the interests of creditors, at the expense of slow growth and mass unemployment, rather than productive businesses and workers. Similar observations have been made by many on the left and some mavericks on the right.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How rich &#8220;moochers&#8221; hurt America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makers vs. Takers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 3-point plan of wealthy landlords, lenders and insurance providers -- the true "takers" threatening the nation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/private_sector_parasites/">column</a> detailing the true "makers" and "takers" in America, I argued that the greatest threat to American capitalism today comes not from public taxation supporting public programs, but from “private taxation” in the form of excessive private “rents” that subsidize private sector parasites or “rentiers” (like landlords, lenders and providers of health insurance and healthcare). These excessive private taxes or rents are costs on productive enterprise that can be as crippling as excessive public taxation.</p><p>In American politics as in the American economy, power and wealth have shifted from the industrial capitalists of old to the “rent lords” of the early 21st century, based in the overgrown FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate) sector. The agenda of the new rentier oligarchy in the U.S. is quite different from that of traditional productive businesses. The Rentier Agenda consists of low taxes on rentiers, the privatization of infrastructure and social insurance, and a macroeconomic policy that favors creditors rather than debtors, including debtor businesses and debtor governments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Republican fantasy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan's new budget plan reveals how the GOP sees the world, in four easy steps]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the ways to differentiate liberals and conservatives today is to consider their respective caricatured sci-fi visions of the future. In cartoon terms, the liberal caricature is a "we're all in this together" utopia of communitarian kumbaya, while the conservative caricature is basically "Back to the Future II" -- a Biff Tannen-dominated dystopia of moral and economic decay whose only unifying ethos is thinking of -- and violently protecting -- oneself. Thus, liberals generally support stuff like universal social insurance and the social safety net, while conservatives tend to get fired up against gun control, taxes and a social safety net, and for massive military budgets.</p><p>At the rank-and-file voter level, this is, of course, a cartoon version of ideologies; many self-described liberals are hardly dreaming of turning America into a giant kibbutz while many self-described conservatives just want the government out of their face. However, at the elected official level in Washington, the conservative cartoon in particular is no comedic caricature: As Rep. Paul Ryan's new House Republican budget shows, it is an actual worldview, with specific legislative proposals in tow.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Reich explains why you won&#8217;t get rich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former labor secretary says Washington's fiscal priorities are dangerously out of whack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former labor secretary <a href="http://www.upworthy.com/trying-to-get-richer-heres-why-you-can-pretty-much-give-up-now">Robert Reich</a> says, "The idea that most Americans have been living beyond their means is pure fantasy perpetrated by a small minority at the top whose means have gone through the stratosphere."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uB_Yuo6XNAA" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I just solved the sequester!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/i_just_solved_the_sequester_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/i_just_solved_the_sequester_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tax expenditures offer Republicans and Democrats alike the opportunity to cut spending and increase revenue]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, maybe the title to this post is slightly inflated, but only slightly.</p><p>A central reason we’re heading into the self-inflicted wound known as sequestration is because R’s refuse to budge on any new revenues in a deficit reduction deal to offset the $85 billion in auto-cuts about to hit our already wobbly economy.  The problem, they say, is on the spending side, not the revenue side.  D’s insist on balance—the solution must include both spending cuts <em>and</em> revenue increases, they maintain.</p><p>But what if I offered you–them–a solution that scratched both of those itches at once…a way to simultaneously both cut spending and raise revenues?  That would be irresistible, right?</p><p>Well, I’ve got exactly that.  I’m working up testimony on this for the Senate next week but the solution is so damn compelling—and the sequestration deadline only hours away—it would be downright unpatriotic to keep it to myself a second longer.</p><p>So, are you ready?</p><p>It’s <em><strong>tax expenditures!</strong></em></p><p>Wait a minute…where’re you going?  Get back here right now!  I’m telling you, this should work.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/i_just_solved_the_sequester_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/i_just_solved_the_sequester_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
