<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tea Parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tea_parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party welcomes Newt to New York</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/tea_party_welcomes_newt_to_new_york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/tea_party_welcomes_newt_to_new_york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10292187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Followers forgive his failings and hail his prospects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Staten Island, N.Y., hotel where Republican presidential front-runner Newt Gingrich appeared on Saturday afternoon for a “Tea Party Town Hall” could hardly have been more nondescript. Nestled deep inside a corporate park somewhere in New York City's most bucolic (and conservative) borough, the Hilton Garden Inn looked identical to scores of other hopelessly bland places across America — which didn't stop Gingrich from beginning his speech with praise for the hotel’s artwork. “Very, very impressive,” he told the 600-person crowd, to applause.</p><p>The staples of Gingrich’s repertoire -- aggressive rhetoric, intense self-regard, historical pomposity, and organizational chaos -- were on full display. “In <em>his</em> world, the government is sovereign, and we are merely subjects,” Gingrich said of President Obama. “In <em>our</em> world, we are citizens, and the government is our servant.” He even tried his hand at a bit of theology. “All of us are flawed,” Gingrich noted when a journalist asked about his well-documented personal foibles. “The belief that only one person was perfect, and that was Christ” encapsulates “the heart of Christianity,” he affirmed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/tea_party_welcomes_newt_to_new_york/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/tea_party_welcomes_newt_to_new_york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad week for right-wing TV and movies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/bad_week_for_right_wing_tv_and_movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/bad_week_for_right_wing_tv_and_movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlas Shrugged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10198950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[\"Atlas Shrugged\" mistakenly calls itself an effete liberal film and the Tea Party TV channel turns out to be a scam]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you, like most Americans, run out to your local Cato Institute gift shop and buy a DVD copy of "Atlas Shrugged: Part I" the second it was released? If you did, I'm afraid you've bought a defective product. Unfortunately, these DVDs all came from the factory loaded with a turgid, impenetrable, morally indefensible and wholly incoherent film about railroads and fancy steel. <a href="http://gawker.com/5858759/100000-atlas-shrugged-dvds-recalled-for-perfectly-hilarious-reason">Also the copy on the back of the case is misleading.</a></p><p>The film's producers have released an apologetic press release explaining what went wrong:</p><blockquote><p>The 1957 novel, Atlas Shrugged, is known in philosophical and political circles for presenting a cogent argument advocating a society driven by rational self-interest. On the back of the film's retail DVD and Blu-ray however, the movie's synopsis contradictorily states <em>"AYN RAND's timeless novel of courage and self-sacrifice comes to life..."</em></p></blockquote><p>Did you spot the error there? Rand's Objectivism is staunchly opposed to "courage and self-sacrifice," along every other essential component of basic human empathy, because it is a philosophy for angry teenage boys who imagine that they're intellectually superior to everyone around them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/bad_week_for_right_wing_tv_and_movies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/bad_week_for_right_wing_tv_and_movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deadbeat dad Joe Walsh rewarded for &#8220;support of the family&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Perkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10162515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Family Research Council celebrates the "pro-family" credentials of a guy who owes six figures in back child support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Walsh has earned a 100% "True Blue" rating from the Family Research Council, the evangelical lobbying organization and hideous advocate of assorted bigotries. Not Joe Walsh the Eagle, but <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/8598963-418/rep-walsh-lauded-by-group-for-being-pro-family-though-accused-of-owing-child-support.html">Joe Walsh the "Tea Party" freshman congressman who,</a> not coincidentally, owes more than $100,000 in back child support that he refuses to pay.</p><p>FRC lauds Walsh for his "unwavering support of the family," by which they don't mean <em>his</em> family, because obviously his support for them has been known to waver. But supporting one's actual children is less important, to Tony Perkins and his organization, than Walsh's steadfast belief that the government's sole responsibility is to ensure that life is as difficult and miserable as possible for women and gay people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party paradox</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/the_tea_party_paradox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/the_tea_party_paradox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10141706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney may be poised to take the GOP primary, but it doesn't mean the movement is fading]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney is still struggling to break the 30 percent mark in Republican presidential polling, but a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/opinion/sunday/douthat-mitt-romney-the-inevitable-nominee.html">consensus is building</a> that, one way or another, he's going to walk away with the nomination -- and that it <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/it_cant_be_this_easy_for_mitt_can_it/">may not even be</a> close. This likelihood is in turn <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/10/13/if_romney_wins_tea_party_movement_loses_265333.html">giving rise</a> to another consensus: The Tea Party must be in decline.</p><p>After all, if there's one GOP candidate (besides Jon Huntsman) whose nomination the Tea Party supposedly can't abide, it's the formerly pro-choice and pro-gay rights architect of what amounts to the ObamaCare prototype. (The news today that Romney's Massachusetts healthcare law <a href="http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-romney-healthcare-20111024,0,6849099.story">apparently provides some care</a> for illegal immigrants will only strengthen this perception.) In 2010, the Tea Party united behind unknown, underfunded gadflies and derailed well-credentialed candidates like Romney in several high-profile primaries. If the GOP presidential race was being held back then, the thinking goes, surely Romney wouldn't have received the pass he now seems likely to get.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/the_tea_party_paradox/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/the_tea_party_paradox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats can&#8217;t occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/democrats_populism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/democrats_populism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10106883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six reasons why Obama\'s party can\'t go populist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the Occupy Wall Street movement do for the Democrats what the Tea Party has done for the Republicans? Will a spontaneous grass-roots uprising against the rich neutralize the manipulated “Astroturf” Tea Party movement’s assault on big government, assure a second term for Barack Obama and lead to the new New Deal that progressives have been waiting for?</p><p>Alas, probably not. Ever since Richard Nixon won his reelection victory in 1972 by appealing to many of the discontented populists attracted to George Wallace, the Republican Party, formerly a party of big city boardroom types and small-town Rotarians, has been based at least in its rhetoric on right-wing populism. The Tea Party movement is merely an extreme exaggeration of the mainstream GOP.</p><p>But the Democrats since George McGovern captured the party’s presidential nomination in the same fateful year of 1972 have been the opposite of a left-wing populist party. Thus while right-wing populism reinforces the existing Republican story about America, any genuine left-wing populism would challenge the basic constituencies and values of the McGovern-to-Obama Democrats. There are six reasons in particular why Democrats are unlikely to benefit as much from populism as Republicans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/democrats_populism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/democrats_populism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>194</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing: A Tea People&#8217;s History</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/a_tea_peoples_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/a_tea_peoples_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10104866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exclusive read from the history book they won't teach in schools! The story of our holy Constitution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Continental Congress organized the new nation with a document called the American Rules of Acquisition, an early precursor to our Constitution. While the Rules -- also known as the Articles of Confederation -- wisely established a weak central government and powerful states’ rights, there was a certain spark missing -- the spark of Natural Law, which was the Founders’ preferred phrase for the Ten Commandments.</p><p>Some argue that the Articles of Confederation created a federal government that was <em>too</em> small and weak, but in fact the primary problem with the Articles was that they were far too left-wing. Government bureaucracy killed nearly 2,000 soldiers at Valley Forge. It was apparent that a change was needed!</p><p>While planting some hemp one day, George Washington discovered an early draft of the Constitution, written in ancient Egyptian on a series of golden plates buried deep within the ground at Mount Vernon. James Madison translated and elaborated on the text, with the help of Thomas Jefferson and an angel. The excited Founders immediately called for a Constitutional Convention to officially ratify the document and formally make America the best country ever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/a_tea_peoples_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/a_tea_peoples_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Icons that would shock today&#039;s right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/american_icons_conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/american_icons_conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Dr. Seuss to the Statue of Liberty, these American mainstays would have been decried by modern conservatives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boogeymen are everywhere these days, if you believe the conservatives' Perpetual Paranoia Machine. A few years ago, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=28336">WorldNetDaily</a> and the American Family Association warned that Barney the Dinosaur was trying to "surreptitiously indoctrinate young children into [homosexuals'] lifestyle." Then, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200511210003">Fox News' Bill O'Reilly</a> warned that "secular progressives" were waging a "War on Christmas" and pressing the "legalization of narcotics, euthanasia, abortion at will [and] gay marriage." Now, schools are <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2011-08-22-book-ban-schools_n.htm">busy banning books</a> for their <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/08/vonnegut-library-director-fights-school-districts-slaughterhouse-five-ban/40978/">"filthy"</a> messages, while Fox and Friends warns that SpongeBob is leading a sinister plot to convert kids to Al Gore's eco-crusade.</p><p>Welcome to America at the edge of insanity, where even the most innocuous items are now considered diabolical threats to the culture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/american_icons_conservatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/american_icons_conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party sticking with alleged deadbeat dad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/joe_walsh_child_support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/joe_walsh_child_support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/15/joe_walsh_child_support</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Joe Walsh is embroiled in a nasty court battle with his ex-wife over child support payments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., has quickly become one of the most recognizable Tea Party freshmen in Congress, making headlines and earning admiration from the right for his withering attacks on Barack Obama, including calling the president a <a href="http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/metro/illinois-congressman-joe-walsh-debt-ceiling-president-obama-lying-no-shame-video-20110713">liar</a> and "<a href="http://www.nwherald.com/mobile/article.xml/articles/2011/08/31/r_hegqn8chrfyo9cjmjoss7a/index.xml">idiotic</a>."</p><p>But in recent weeks a nasty court fight between Walsh and his ex-wife, who alleges that he owes $117,000 in back child support for their three children, has spilled into public view. The story got us&#160;wondering: How do Tea Party types who supported Walsh in 2010 feel about the allegations?</p><p>So far, they're either withholding judgment or giving Walsh -- who ran on a family values platform -- the benefit of the doubt. His campaign <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20100601022539/http://walshforcongress.com/issues/familyissues/">platform</a> spoke of "traditional marriage" and referred to the family as&#160;"the core unit which determines the strength of any society."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/joe_walsh_child_support/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/joe_walsh_child_support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Tea Party scaring Republicans too?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/tea_party_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/tea_party_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/15/tea_party_republicans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A poll finds that over half of them aren't fans of the movement. But what does that mean?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN has <a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/09/15/rel15e.pdf">an interesting new poll</a> comparing the attitudes of Republicans who identify with the Tea Party movement to those who don't. Perhaps surprisingly, the survey finds that fully 51 percent of Republicans define themselves as non-Tea Party members have neutral, conflicted or negative views toward the movement. The other 49 percent say they are either part of the movement or in agreement with it philosophically.</p><p>According to CNN's polling director, this split "effectively boils down to the century-old contest between the conservative and moderate wings of the party." But that doesn't seem quite right.</p><p>While the data does show that there are some clear differences between Tea Party and non-Tea Party Republicans, it's hard not to conclude that Republicans generally share a thoroughly conservative political philosophy. Consider some of the areas where the two groups are fairly similar:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/tea_party_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/tea_party_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>List of million-dollar Koch group donors leaks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/koch_donors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/koch_donors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/06/koch_donors</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The billionaires who fund the conservative movement accidentally receive a little unwanted publicity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Koch brothers -- the super-wealthy longtime funders of Republican politicians and libertarian think tanks and big industry front groups and much of the rest of the regulation-gutting anti-labor economic arm of the conservative movement for the last couple of decades -- have a big retreat twice a year where they and their fellow wealthy donors to the cause coordinate their campaign strategy and congratulate themselves for loving Liberty so much. It is, obviously, all top-secret, and no one is supposed to know who attends or what they are doing. Except someone taped the conference this year <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/09/koch-brothers-million-dollar-donor-club">and sent the tape to Mother Jones,</a> so now we have a list of secret million-dollar donors to Koch-backed groups.</p><p>Think Progress revealed some of the invitees to one of <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/10/20/124642/beck-koch-chamber-meeting/">last year's meetings.</a>. Increased awareness of the role the Kochs play in our national politics led to protests at the February retreat, which was suddenly guarded by <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/82651/problem-youre-viewed-sinister-moguls-solution-hired-goons">hired goons</a>. (Right-wingers decried these protests as <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/03/koch_chick_fil_a_liberals">assaults on the civil liberties of the Kochs and their billionaire friends.</a>)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/koch_donors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/koch_donors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell, Bachmann, Palin failures point to growing crazy fatigue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exploitation of liberal-scaring culture war heroines growing less profitable every day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal media will never lose their obsession with the photogenic crazies of the conservative movement, but there are a few hints (enough for a trend piece) that the public at large is getting a bit sick of them. (The outlier is Rick Perry's poll numbers.)</p><p>The Newsweek Michele Bachman cover <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/controversy-selling-tina-brown-134479">posted newsstand sales no higher than most other Newsweek covers</a>. The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist">"crazy eyes" cover</a> moved 47,225 copies, according to Newsweek, though AdWeek says other industry sources say it sold somewhere between 35,000 and 48,000. Is that good? Well, "the magazine's single copy sales averaged 46,561 per issue in the first half of 2011."</p><p>We are talking only about newsstand sales, not total circulation, but this does mean that Bachmann's incredibly controversial and very buzzy crazy eyes did not "move the needle," as annoying people say. Of course, the actual <em>article</em> about Bachmann, inside of the eye-grabbing cover, <a href="salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/08/08/bachmann_theocrat_nyer/">was pretty bland.</a> But since when does the quality of the journalism have anything to do with newsstand sales?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sad Tea Party freshman hates his stupid new job</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/sad_tea_party_guy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/sad_tea_party_guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/26/sad_tea_party_guy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Steve Southerland wishes he'd never gotten elected to Congress -- he only makes six figures!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Dave Weigel comes <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/08/26/steve_southerland_s_fine_whine_0.html">the sad tale of Rep. Steve Southerland,</a> a "tea party" freshman representing Florida's 2nd District. Southerland learned the hard way that being a congressman is not all fun and games. <a href="http://floridacapitalnews.com/article/20110825/CAPITOLNEWS/108250324">He barely earns enough to get by!</a></p><blockquote>
<p>He said his $174,000 salary is not so much, considering the hours a member of the House puts in, and that he had to sever ties with his family business in Panama City. Southerland also said there are no instant pensions or free health insurance, as some of his constituents often ask him about in Congress.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida%27s_2nd_congressional_district">Median income in Southerland's district:</a> $34,718.</p><p>(And the health insurance isn't "free," but it is high-quality group private insurance with relatively cheap plans subsidized by Southerland's employer, the federal government. And he'll qualify for the pension in a couple of years, if he's reelected.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/sad_tea_party_guy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/sad_tea_party_guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hurricane forecasting one of the many things GOP doesn&#8217;t want to spend money on</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/hurricane_funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/hurricane_funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/26/hurricane_funding</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every natural disaster now comes with a story of how Congress cut funding to detect or respond to it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurricane Irene is going to hit the United States' east coast this weekend, as you have likely heard. It looks to be a pretty nasty storm, capable of causing <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/26/new-york-hurricane-could-be-multibillion-dollar-catastrophe/">billions of dollars of damage</a>. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been <a href="http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/#IRENE">carefully tracking Irene</a>, forecasting its path up the coast and its intensity. Of course, America's Republican-demanded White House-encouraged austerity budget includes cuts to the NOAA. Cuts that will delay -- by years -- <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-25/fema-put-to-test-as-hurricane-supplies-moved-to-new-jersey-massachusetts.html">the construction and launch of an extreme weather forecasting satellite.</a> So let's hope there aren't any serious hurricanes in 2016, I guess?</p><p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/green/2011/08/24/302797/hurricane-irene-budget-cuts/">Think Progress</a> links to the words of <a href="http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/weather-alerts-are-imperiled-noaa-warns/">NOAA administrator Dr. Jane Lubchenco:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/hurricane_funding/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/hurricane_funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>142</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will &#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221; run for Congress?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And if so, how many minutes will it take for him to say something embarrassing to a reporter? Ten?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Joe the Plumber," a man named Sam who is not a plumber, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/joe-plumber-may-run-congress-141951107.html">may run for Congress.</a> Joe, a briefly famous desperate attempt by the John McCain campaign to paint Barack Obama as an enemy of the working man, is mulling a run against Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, who's been in the House since 1983. Joe <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/joe-plumber-may-run-congress-141951107.html">told Yahoo's "The Ticket" his thoughts on the potential campaign:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>"I'm not ruling anything out," Wurzelbacher told The Ticket in an interview Thursday. He added that he thought it was an "interesting idea" and that people have been asking him to run for office since he confronted Obama four years ago. He's spent much of his time since then on the speaker's circuit, he said, encouraging others to run for office.</p>
<p>"I like the idea of it -- just regular Americans running. If a regular guy runs, right away the media's going to attack him," Wurzelbacher said. "What kind of education does he have? What does he know about this? My answer to that is, regular Americans aren't experts, but dammit, look where the experts have gotten us. Maybe we need some regular guys in there. That's what I've been doing the past two and a half years, just encouraging regular Americans to run. Tell the liberal media to go to hell and I don't care what you guys say about me, I'm going to try to fix this country."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erick Erickson to insurgent candidate: Sorry, my bosses are friends with George Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/erick_erickson_bosses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/erick_erickson_bosses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/24/erick_erickson_bosses</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An "independent" Republican pundit is encouraged to lay off an establishment candidate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick Erickson is a popular and influential Republican blogger because his name is fun to write and say. At least I think that's why he's popular and influential. It certainly isn't because he's a deep thinker or brilliant strategist or compelling writer or independent voice. He masquerades as the last one, but <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0811/Publishers_social_ties_pushed_RedState_toward_Allen.html">Ben Smith today brings word</a> of Erickson aiding a consummate hack establishment Republican politician because Erickson's bosses are regulars on the dreaded cocktail party circuit.</p><p>George Allen, the former senator from Virginia notable primarily for being <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/07/allen_racism_again">as casually racist</a> as a senator from Virginia twice his age, is running for Senate again. Erickson initially opposed Allen, preferring a more Tea Partyish challenger named Jamie Radtke. Then he stopped mentioning the Radtke campaign, and then he didn't invite Radtke to his "RedState convention." He explained why in an email:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/erick_erickson_bosses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/erick_erickson_bosses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrin Hatch&#8217;s guide to avoiding a Tea Party primary challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senior senator from Utah didn't have room to move right, so he went mean]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orrin hatch used to be the symbol of how our American political system could, against the odds, still work for Americans. The rabidly conservative senator was proud to call the steadfastly liberal Sen. Ted Kennedy his personal friend. He is a symbol of how the Senate used to pride itself on civility trumping partisanship. No moderate he, Hatch was still able to see his political opponents as humans, and he could recognize where there was common ground to be sought. And that is why the Tea Parties hated him and wanted to primary him.</p><p>But Hatch got out of it! Somehow, against all odds, Rep. Jason Chaffetz <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2011/08/22/ap_sources_chaffetz_wont_take_on_orrin_hatch/">decided not to run against Hatch</a> in 2012, after going so far as to hold town halls outside his district to gauge support for a run.</p><p>Hatch's poll numbers had <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903596904576519021824003198.html">begun to crawl up</a>, though, and Chaffetz decided his sure-thing reelection was safer than battling an entrenched million-term senator.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting to know the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/getting_to_know_the_tea_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/getting_to_know_the_tea_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/08/17/getting_to_know_the_tea_party</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the GOP's white conservative base in silly costumes. Why couldn't the media figure that out sooner?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholar Robert Putnam, best known for his study of American atomization in "Bowling Alone," has produced new data on the Tea Party and it's being billed as a shocker. Sit down before you read this: They are older, white conservative Christians "who were highly partisan Republicans long before the Tea Party was born."</p><p>Not surprised? Neither was I, but the research is actually fascinating. Putnam and Notre Dame's David Campbell tracked the role of faith and politics for their last book, "American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us." They went back to look at attitudes toward the Tea Party among 3,000 survey respondents for the paperback edition, and wrote an Op-Ed in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/opinion/crashing-the-tea-party.html?_r=1">Wednesday's New York Times.</a></p><p>Some of their key findings: "Even compared to other white Republicans, [Tea Party backers] had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do." They're not a product of the Great Recession, Campbell and Putnam write. "Many Americans have suffered in the last four years, but they are no more likely than anyone else to support the Tea Party." Big government isn't the issue that drives them: "Concern over big government is hardly the only or even the most important predictor of Tea Party support among voters." They are social conservatives who believe religion should play a strong role in politics: 76 percent said our "laws and policies would be better if more elected officials were deeply religious."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/getting_to_know_the_tea_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/getting_to_know_the_tea_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party people less popular than many other hated minority groups</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/tea_party_poll_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/tea_party_poll_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/17/tea_party_poll</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They may want "their country" back, but their country doesn't really want them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a shadowy group of malcontents in America today, plotting a grand takeover of our political institutions in order to completely remake the country according to their wishes. Despite the fact the members of this group are a small minority of the population, and an unpopular one at that, they seek to infiltrate the courts and the government at every level, in order to replace our long-standing system of law with their own extremist, undemocratic religious code. These true believers are especially dangerous because they think they're doing God's work, and you ignore them, or play down the threat they pose to America, at your own risk. This tiny band of fanatics is largely distrusted and despised by regular Americans, but a terrified media coddles them and pretends they're harmless. I am speaking, of course, of the Tea Parties, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/opinion/crashing-the-tea-party.html?_r=1">a group now officially less popular among Americans than Muslims.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/tea_party_poll_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/tea_party_poll_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Christine O&#8217;Donnell regrets her witch comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not because she is witch, but because it was a bad political move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more entertaining Senate races of 2010 involved conservative activist Christine O'Donnell, who won a startling Republican primary victory in Delaware over the party establishment's candidate, then-Rep. Michael Castle.</p><p>During the ensuing general election campaign, a video from 1999 emerged in which O'Donnell told Bill Maher that she "dabbled" in witchcraft in her youth. The Tea Party candidate, fearing that this might alientate her Christian support base, quickly released a video in which she stated, "I'm not a witch." The comment invited a wealth of media mockery (and an SNL spoof -- see below).</p><p>In her new memoir, "Troublemaker: Let&#8217;s Do What It Takes to Make America Great Again," O'Donnell expresses regret over the video. According to the AP, she writes, "It was a wrong-headed move, made for all the wrong reasons, but it was mine." O'Donnell also blames an insistent media consultant for pushing the idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Fred Upton is actually the perfect pick for John Boehner and the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/fred_upton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/fred_upton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/10/fred_upton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the GOP picks for the deficit reduction "super committee" looks surprisingly pragmatic -- at first glance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican leaders in the Senate and House <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/08/10/debt.committee.appointments/index.html">announced late Wednesday morning</a> the six members they will appoint to the deficit reduction "super committee," and one of Speaker John Boehner's picks immediately stood out: Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan.</p><p>This seems -- at first glance -- like a very risky selection. Democrats hope to use the super committee to pursue a more "balanced" approach to deficit reduction, but they'll need at least one of the Republican members to join them. And if you examine his full career, the 58-year-old Upton, who was first elected to the House in 1986, is exactly the kind of Republican appointee Democrats have been hoping for -- an authentic political moderate who has regularly broken with his party and its leadership through the years. Did Boehner just make a big mistake?</p><p>Hardly. Upton's story actually illustrates perfectly why hard-line conservatives have nothing to fear -- and why meaningful compromise with congressional Republicans is essentially impossible in the current climate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/fred_upton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/fred_upton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

