Boogeymen are everywhere these days, if you believe the conservatives’ Perpetual Paranoia Machine. A few years ago, WorldNetDaily and the American Family Association warned that Barney the Dinosaur was trying to “surreptitiously indoctrinate young children into [homosexuals'] lifestyle.” Then, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly warned that “secular progressives” were waging a “War on Christmas” and pressing the “legalization of narcotics, euthanasia, abortion at will [and] gay marriage.” Now, schools are busy banning books for their “filthy” messages, while Fox and Friends warns that SpongeBob is leading a sinister plot to convert kids to Al Gore’s eco-crusade.

Welcome to America at the edge of insanity, where even the most innocuous items are now considered diabolical threats to the culture.

Exceptions like “Slaughterhouse Five” aside, the products that generate the most manufactured outrage and hysteria today tend to be new — puppets, celebrities’ vanity tomes, cartoons and other detritus in our cultural waste dump. However, it stands to reason that if the same Perpetual Paranoia Machine applied its standards of manufactured outrage across the board, it would end up targeting many of the most long-standing “American” symbols for elimination.

Pondering which of those symbols is an important thought experiment — it locates our relative position on the psychological map, telling us just how extreme our sociopathy is at this moment of chaos. So without further ado, here are the top 10 most universally “American” symbols that would be labeled as seditious, unpatriotic anti-American agitprop if they had been first introduced today.

10. The Collected Works of Dr. Seuss

For most of the last half-century, being a kid meant reading and loving the collected works of Theodor Seuss Geisel — aka Dr. Seuss. Think back to your earliest years, and you are likely to recall Geisel’s legendary catalog. His works are as integral to American childhood as fireworks on July 4 — and thankfully, Geisel published his books before the advent of Fox News. For if this New Deal liberal had published them today, they would likely be burned in televised Tea Party rallies.

For example, 1957′s “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” — which criticizes the commercialization of the holiday season — would be held up by Bill O’Reilly as an example of the vicious War on Christmas. Likewise, 1971′s “The Lorax,” which is a parable about the downsides of hyper-industrialization and environmental degradation, would be at least as viciously denigrated as Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth.” And had 1984′s “The Butter Battle Book” been introduced during the “War on Terror,” it would have gotten Dr. Seuss put on a no-fly list and labeled a seditious, al-Qaida-loving traitor.

9. The Golden Rule

Treat others as you would want them to treat you. This idea, which undergirds the concept of human rights, is as old as organized religion, and is a proud basis for America’s dominant Judeo-Christian traditions. In the Old Testament, scripture says to “love thy neighbor as thyself,” while New Testament says “Do to others as you would have them do to you” — and we teach this to kids at the earliest age.

But had someone published these words for the first time today, that person would seem like a radical left-wing ideologue. After all, America is a country whose definition of “class warfare” is making the rich pay the same tax rates as everyone else. It is a nation that gets angry at leaders who suggest redistributing some of the wealth.

In the context of that me-first-screw-everyone-else culture, and in the context of drone warfare, rendition, torture, warrantless wiretapping, Wall Street predation and budget cuts to social services, the Golden Rule would be vilified as a Marxist idiom — and its proponents would, at best, be depicted as coffeehouse communists who refuse to live in the real world. More likely, they’d be attacked as unpatriotically justifying blowback against the United States for our military actions across the world.

8. The South Carolina State Flag

Though you wouldn’t know it from the every-presidential-campaign-year brouhaha over the flying of the Confederate stars and bars, South Carolina’s state flag happens to be a crescent moon flying over a palm tree. This design is rooted in pure, chest-thumpingly proud Americana, having something to do with the Revolutionary War, the Stamp Act and a military official named William Moultrie. But had it been a new design proposed today, South Carolina would likely be accused by conservatives of trying to create a terrorist cell in the heart of Dixie.

Take a look at South Carolina’s flag next to, say, Saudi Arabian iconography and you see that it’s a flag that could easily double up as the national symbol of an Islamic country in a Middle Eastern desert. The crescent moon, of course, is an Islamic symbol already featured on many Muslim nations’ flags, and the palm tree has long been a symbol of an oasis in a Sahara-like desert.

No doubt, South Carolinians would vehemently deny the charge that its flag suggests any kind of tolerance for Muslims. This is a state that seems totally psyched about its long heritage of bigotry — a state that continues to fly symbols of slavery on its public grounds. But there’s little doubt that outfits like WorldNetDaily would make the same Islamophobic claims about the South Carolina flag that it’s made about other public symbols.

7. The Statue of Liberty

As any elementary school trip to New York City teaches, the Statue of Liberty is a symbol of warmly welcoming the world’s refugees to America. Indeed, Lady Liberty is so synonymous with a pro-immigration stand, she is the home of a famous plaque memorializing the 1883 poem, “The New Colossus,” which says, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”

Yet, had this statue been first erected today with the same message, it would generate an orgiastic anti-immigrant protest that would make last year’s Park51 pandemonium look tame. With talk of building walls at the border and with mass deportations of undocumented workers on the rise, this age of xenophobia would have zero tolerance for any kind of state-sanctioned sculpture enthusiastically welcoming the world’s “wretched refuse” and “the homeless, tempest-tost.”

6. Labor Day

Try to imagine an America without Labor Day. Then, try to imagine a modern-day president of the United States signing a bill creating a national holiday to honor unions — and try to imagine that bill being seen as a necessary election-year compromise.

Most likely, you can’t imagine this, even though this is exactly what happened in 1894 when President Grover Cleveland signed such a measure as a peace offering after he deployed federal troops to violently crush the Pullman strikes. You can’t imagine this, because a president today wouldn’t merely be lambasted for considering such a national holiday — he’d probably be impeached for treason in a nation that now euphorically celebrates ever more vicious attacks on organized labor and makes political folk heroes out of union-busting governors.

Labor Day today, of course, involves national festivities that (outside of the day’s union events) all but avoid mentioning organized labor. If the holiday is celebrated at all, it is celebrated as the last gasp of summer fun — and nothing more. But the history of the holiday, though buried and willfully ignored, reminds us of just how impossible it would be to legislate such a quintessentially American day in the 21st century.

5. “This Land Is My Land” and “We Are the World”

Woodie Guthrie’s “This Land Is Your Land” is one of those iconic summer camp jingles regularly bellowed out by kids roasting marshmallows around the fire. It teaches children those universal lessons about sharing and inclusion. Which is why it would be excoriated as a subliminal plot against capitalism had it first come out today.

Think about it: Had Guthrie first released his ditty in 2011, rather than in 1945, it would surely become the top target of the arch-conservative private-property-rights movement in America. Guthrie would be promptly accused of being a land “redistributionist” looking to wage a Marxist holy war on the very concept of ownership. The protest signs at his record label’s offices — which would inevitably become bumper stickers — would be red-white-and-blue-themed placards, reading: “This Land is My Land, NOT Your Land.”

4. Bert and Ernie

America has never been a particularly gay-friendly nation, so it’s a miracle that Bert and Ernie were ever allowed on television in the first place. But they’ve been there consistently since 1969.

And yet, had the Children’s Television Workshop waited a few years more to introduce the pair to America’s kids, they probably would have faced a much more hostile reception. Modern-day America is a nation whose leading right-wing Christian groups now insist that anti-bullying laws promote homosexuality among children. Can you imagine what that same right-wing Christian movement would do to a child-focused puppet show about two adult men cohabiting in the same bedroom? Of course, Bert and Ernie are clearly depicted as sleeping in separate beds (and, let’s face it, they’re puppets who, as the show’s creators themselves have pointed out, are about as asexual as you can get), but that would hardly tamp down the anti-gay hysteria.

3. The Weekend

The epic struggle for a 40-hour work week in America culminated in the late 1930s with the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Effectively, this legislatively cemented the contemporary concept known as the American Weekend.

Today, though, such a law probably could never be passed. With corporations dominating our politics so completely, and with the United States now in a race-to-the-bottom competition with slave-labor countries, the notion of a weekend — had it not already existed — would likely be cited by lobbyists and by Rupert Murdoch’s attack machine as yet another ultraliberal scheme to help lazy layabout workers live a life of undue luxury. Just as the indigent have been criticized as “welfare queens,” so too would proponents of two-days-a-week of off-time be hammered as “weekend queens.”

2. The First Amendment

The constitutional right to freely express one’s opinion and to freely worship one’s own religion — our First Amendment distinguishes our founding Constitution from so many other nations’. But had we not been lucky enough to get it on the books back in the 18th century, it’s hard to imagine it being legislated into law today.

During the so-called War on Terror, we’ve seen citizens arrested and jailed for daring to stage public protests, media-backed mobs try to prevent Islamic cultural centers from being erected, presidential candidates insist that communities can outlaw places of worship, and a president target an American citizen for assassination (without charge) for the “crime” of speech. Likewise, as corporate media conglomerates have risen to prominence, we’ve seen political messages censored off the publicly owned airwaves.

In this cauldron, had a group of legislators proposed a constitutional amendment guaranteeing a right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion where one did not yet exist, those same forces would undoubtedly align those lawmakers, accusing them of making common cause with terrorists.

1. The Holy Bible

Often touted as the catechism for right-wing religious politics, the Holy Bible is the ultimate American bestseller, appearing everywhere in our country. It’s in our churches, our bookstores, our libraries and our motel desk drawers. But had the Good Book first been published today, it’s hard to imagine it not being the target of a censorship campaign by Fox News, which would bill it as a new and dangerous Communist Manifesto.

You see, when you actually read the Bible (rather than making selective political reference to it as so many often do), you find that it is filled with passages echoing progressive liberation theology, from “the meek shall inherit the earth” to its diatribes against usury. Additionally, one of its central characters seems to have anti-capitalist tendencies. As reported by the Washington Post’s Gregory Paul:

Jesus is no free marketeer. Improving one’s earthly financial circumstances is not nearly as critical as preparing for the end times that will arrive at any minute. He does offer substantial encouragement for the poor, and warns the wealthy that they are in grave danger of blowing their prospects of reaching paradise, as per the metaphor of a rich person entering heaven being as difficult as a camel passing through the eye of the needle…

To understand just how non-capitalistic Christianity is supposed to be we turn to the first chapter after the gospels, Acts, which describes the events of the early church. Chapters 2 and 4 state that all “the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need … No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had … There were no needy persons among them. From time to time those who owned lands or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles feet, and it was distributed to anyone as he had need.”

Now folks, that’s outright socialism of the type described millennia later by Marx — who likely got the general idea from the gospels.

Paul is exactly right — and only because the Bible is a few thousand years removed from its first publication run is it allowed to remain immune from the wrath of the Right Wing Hate Machine.

Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., has quickly become one of the most recognizable Tea Party freshmen in Congress, making headlines and earning admiration from the right for his withering attacks on Barack Obama, including calling the president a liar and “idiotic.”

CNN has an interesting new poll comparing the attitudes of Republicans who identify with the Tea Party movement to those who don’t. Perhaps surprisingly, the survey finds that fully 51 percent of Republicans define themselves as non-Tea Party members have neutral, conflicted or negative views toward the movement. The other 49 percent say they are either part of the movement or in agreement with it philosophically.

According to CNN’s polling director, this split “effectively boils down to the century-old contest between the conservative and moderate wings of the party.” But that doesn’t seem quite right.

The Koch brothers — the super-wealthy longtime funders of Republican politicians and libertarian think tanks and big industry front groups and much of the rest of the regulation-gutting anti-labor economic arm of the conservative movement for the last couple of decades — have a big retreat twice a year where they and their fellow wealthy donors to the cause coordinate their campaign strategy and congratulate themselves for loving Liberty so much. It is, obviously, all top-secret, and no one is supposed to know who attends or what they are doing. Except someone taped the conference this year and sent the tape to Mother Jones, so now we have a list of secret million-dollar donors to Koch-backed groups.

The liberal media will never lose their obsession with the photogenic crazies of the conservative movement, but there are a few hints (enough for a trend piece) that the public at large is getting a bit sick of them. (The outlier is Rick Perry’s poll numbers.)

The Newsweek Michele Bachman cover posted newsstand sales no higher than most other Newsweek covers. The “crazy eyes” cover moved 47,225 copies, according to Newsweek, though AdWeek says other industry sources say it sold somewhere between 35,000 and 48,000. Is that good? Well, “the magazine’s single copy sales averaged 46,561 per issue in the first half of 2011.”

From Dave Weigel comes the sad tale of Rep. Steve Southerland, a “tea party” freshman representing Florida’s 2nd District. Southerland learned the hard way that being a congressman is not all fun and games. He barely earns enough to get by!

He said his $174,000 salary is not so much, considering the hours a member of the House puts in, and that he had to sever ties with his family business in Panama City. Southerland also said there are no instant pensions or free health insurance, as some of his constituents often ask him about in Congress.