<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tennis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tennis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Djokovic beats Murray for 3rd straight Aust. Open title</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/djokovic_beats_murray_for_3rd_straight_aust_title/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/djokovic_beats_murray_for_3rd_straight_aust_title/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novak Djokovic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/djokovic_beats_murray_for_3rd_straight_aust_title/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After losing the first set he swept the next three. No one broke serve until the third set]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — Novak Djokovic returned to his dominant best to win his third consecutive Australian Open title, denying Andy Murray a second major championship with a 6-7 (2), 7-6 (3), 6-3, 6-2 victory Sunday night at Rod Laver Arena.</p><p>The top-ranked Djokovic is the first man in the Open era to win three straight Australian titles.</p><p>Born a week apart in May 1987 and friends since their junior playing days, the two played like they knew each other's game well in a rematch of last year's U.S. Open final won by Murray. There were no service breaks until the eighth game of the third set, when Djokovic finally broke through and then held at love to lead by two sets to one.</p><p>Djokovic also secured the second break of the match to take a 2-1 lead in the fourth set then went ahead by two service breaks and took a 4-1 lead when Murray double-faulted on break point.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/djokovic_beats_murray_for_3rd_straight_aust_title/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/djokovic_beats_murray_for_3rd_straight_aust_title/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this tennis player&#8217;s &#8220;Serena Williams&#8221; impersonation racist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/is_this_tennis_players_serena_williams_impersonation_racist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/is_this_tennis_players_serena_williams_impersonation_racist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serena Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline Wozniacki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caroline Wozniacki flaunted a stuffed bra and underwear on the court]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-two-year-old tennis player Caroline Wozniacki has stirred up controversy after a bizarre performance in which she stuffed towels in her bra and under her skirt and paraded around in a recent tennis match against Maria Sharapova. In a press conference, Wozniacki joked that she was imitating tennis star Serena Williams, who has gotten attention in the past due to her curvy body. Although the crowd found the stunt <a href="http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/fit-to-post-sports/wozniacki-hilarious-serena-williams-impression-154111590.html">amusing</a>, many are <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/10/serena-williams-impersonation-caroline-wozniacki-racist_n_2272395.html">outraged</a> by the performance, and some are even deeming it racist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/is_this_tennis_players_serena_williams_impersonation_racist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/is_this_tennis_players_serena_williams_impersonation_racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are professional tennis players doping, too?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/are_professional_tennis_players_doping_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/are_professional_tennis_players_doping_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novak Djokovic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Federer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serena Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Nadal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATP World Tour finals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the Lance Armstrong scandal, every incredible athlete looks suspicious. And tennis has a lot of them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Novak Djokovic’s win over Roger Federer yesterday at the ATP World Tour Finals in London, the curtain has come down on the 2012 tennis season. Though on paper a routine-looking straight-set affair (7-6, 7-5), it was, as it so often is these days in the men’s game, thrillingly close, the exchanges regularly hitting that spectatorial sweet spot of long rallies and relentlessly precise shotmaking. The match was the culmination of a sort of mini–Grand Slam event in which only the top eight players compete, duking it out without the early-round drudgery of a true Slam. A purist’s paradise, then, a purged meritocracy of irresistible forces meeting immovable objects? Perhaps. But in the wake of the Lance Armstrong doping scandal, no sport that requires as much training, endurance and sheer athletic grit as does 21st-century professional tennis can insulate itself from the chill winds of suspicion and skepticism. So that now, when confronted with the phenomena of Rafael Nadal’s unbefitting (at least for a tennis player) biceps, Federer’s serenely sweatless exertions, and 54-stroke rallies (cf. Andy Murray vs. Djokovic at this year’s U.S. Open final), an unease creeps into our wonder and admiration. How, exactly, are these guys doing this?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/are_professional_tennis_players_doping_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/are_professional_tennis_players_doping_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wimbledon: Another year, another grunting grumble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/wimbledon_grunting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/wimbledon_grunting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/feature/2011/06/22/wimbledon_grunting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are the Brits so particularly obsessed with grunting women's tennis players, anyway?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Ritchie, the head of England's Wimbledon tennis tournament, has <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis/wimbledon/8589772/Wimbledon-2011-grunting-tennis-players-are-spoiling-the-game.html">told</a> the Daily Telegraph in an interview that officials would "prefer to see less grunting" from athletes in the competition. Ritchie says he blames the grunting trend in tennis primarily on an "education problem with younger players." (It seems this year's particular problem comes in the form of Belarus' <a href="http://vikaazarenkatennis.com/">Victoria Azarenka</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2011/06/wimbledon-women-players-less-grunting-please/39118/">Much</a> has <a href="http://jezebel.com/5814569/women-apparently-ruining-tennis-with-their-excessive-grunting">been</a> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2011/06/22/wimbledon-executive-to-grunting-tennis-players-keep-it-down/">made</a> of Ritchie's <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31751_162-20073288-10391697.html">remarks</a> <a href="http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2011/06/22/wimbledon_grunts_tournament_official_wants_victoria_azarenka_and.html">today</a> (let's face it: How often do most journalists get to use the word "grunt"?). But grunting complaints are hardly new. In fact, grunting is a pet issue for the British press, almost as much of a go-to at Wimbledon time as strawberries and cream.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/wimbledon_grunting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/wimbledon_grunting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navratilova hospitalized after Kilimanjaro attempt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/af_people_navratilova/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/af_people_navratilova/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/10/af_people_navratilova</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tennis icon  "disappointed" not to be able to reach mountain summit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martina Navratilova has been hospitalized in Kenya with an accumulation of fluid in the lungs after attempting to climb Africa's highest peak, according to a statement released Friday evening.</p><p>The 54-year-old tennis great has been diagnosed with high-altitude pulmonary edema, said Dr. David Silverstein, a consultant in cardiology and internal medicine at Nairobi Hospital.</p><p>"It is potentially dangerous when someone is at high altitude, but once brought down, recovery is quick," he said. "Martina is doing well and will continue to do well."</p><p>Navratilova had been assisted down Mount Kilimanjaro by porters and driven to the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre for assessment after having to abandon her attempt to climb the mountain in Tanzania for a sport charity.</p><p>The 27-person climbing team Navratilova was part of has faced heavy snows and mist since beginning the climb up the 19,340-foot (5,895-meter) mountain Monday.</p><p>"I'm disappointed not to be able to complete this amazing journey," she said in the statement. "It was something that I have wanted to do for so long but it was not to be."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/af_people_navratilova/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/af_people_navratilova/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McEnroe: Ease up on female players</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/27/mcenroe_women_tennis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/27/mcenroe_women_tennis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/08/27/mcenroe_women_tennis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tennis champ warns that women are being given more court time than they can handle]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When John McEnroe opens his mouth, he has a knack for getting in trouble. That was true on the tennis court and it is apparently still true even now that he's offering commentary from the sidelines. During a CBS conference call, the U.S. Open champion suggested that&#160;female tennis players are&#160;"unable to deal with both the physical and mental demands of the game," the Los Angeles Times paraphrases.&#160;It's a bold contention considering the New York Times Magazine's <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/08/25/tennis_slow_mo/index.html">current cover story</a>&#160;is about ... the tremendous power and strength of female tennis players.</p><p>"I think that it's asking too much of the women," he said. "They shouldn't be playing as many events as the men. ... You shouldn't push them to play more than they're capable of." He added, "They should be required to be in less events, there should be less events for the women. It seems it takes an actual meltdown on the court or women quitting the game altogether before they realize there's a need to change the schedule."&#160;Presumably, he's referring to Vera Zvonareva's teary-eyed "meltdown" at Wimbledon in July and at last year's Open.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/27/mcenroe_women_tennis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/27/mcenroe_women_tennis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrating female tennis players in slo-mo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/tennis_slow_mo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/tennis_slow_mo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/08/25/tennis_slow_mo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New York Times video slide show highlights the power -- or is it the sex appeal? -- of these top athletes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very excited to read a Web preview of a piece in this weekend's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/magazine/29Tennis-t.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">New York Times Magazine</a> about, as the headline puts it, "Women Who Hit Hard." In the sprawling article, Michael Kimmelman writes that professional female tennis players are "stronger, bigger, faster, better trained and pushed above all by the example of the Williams sisters. Serena, glorious and musclebound, and Venus, long-limbed and tall, have redefined the sport around power." The point, you see, is to celebrate the strength and athleticism of the sport's top female players.</p><p>That's why I was surprised when a link to an accompanying <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/29/magazine/womens-tennis.html?src=tptw">video slide show</a> titled "The Beauty of the Power Game" was forwarded to me by a co-worker with a note that he found it "kind of weird and creepy the way they glammed them up." Having glossed over the slide show when reading the piece earlier, I clicked the link and started watching the first clip of Kim Clijsters. In slo-mo, she bounds into the frame, muscles rippling, and nearly goes into the splits as she brings her racket to the ball. She looks like a lioness on the hunt &#8212; long blond curls falling around her face, a sneer on her lip, her eyes narrowed with a singular, predatory focus. She is an awesome sight to behold. I think: What's weird or creepy about this?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/tennis_slow_mo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/26/tennis_slow_mo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federer loses to Berdych in Wimbledon quarters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/federer_loses_wimbledon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/federer_loses_wimbledon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/06/30/federer_loses_wimbledon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the first time since 2002, the six-time champ won't be on Centre Court for the finals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time in eight years, Roger Federer won't be striding onto Centre Court for the Wimbledon final this weekend.</p><p>The six-time champion was upset in the quarterfinals by hard-hitting Tomas Berdych on Wednesday, stopping his bid for a record-tying seventh title at the All England Club and extending his recent stretch of disappointing play.</p><p>The 12th-seeded Berdych used his big serve and forehand to beat Federer 6-4, 3-6, 6-1, 6-4, on Centre Court for the biggest victory of the Czech's career.</p><p>It's the first time since 2002 that Federer has failed to reach the final. Since losing in the first round eight years ago, Federer had played in the championship match a record seven consecutive times. He won the title six times and finished runner-up once, bolstering his reputation as the greatest player of all-time.</p><p>Winner of a record 16 Grand Slam titles, Federer said he was unable to play his best tennis Wednesday because of pain in his back and right leg.</p><p>"I couldn't play the way I wanted to play," said Federer, who had been chasing the record of seven titles won by Pete Sampras and 19th-century player William Renshaw. "I am struggling with a little bit of a back and a leg issue. That just doesn't quite allow me to play the way I would like to play. It's frustrating, to say the least."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/federer_loses_wimbledon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/30/federer_loses_wimbledon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Capriati&#8217;s drug overdose: Accident or suicide attempt?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/jennifer_capriati_drug_overdose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/jennifer_capriati_drug_overdose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/28/jennifer_capriati_drug_overdose</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former tennis star with history of depression takes too many prescription drugs, but family calls it unintentional]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tennis player Jennifer Capriati is recovering from a drug overdose in a Florida hospital, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/06/27/jennifer-capriati-hospitalized-overdose-florida/">TMZ</a>&#160;reports. According to her <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/06/28/jennifer-capriati-family-overdose-prescription-medication-tennis-star/">family</a>, the three-time Major winner and 1992 Olympic gold medalist accidentally overdosed on drugs prescribed to her by doctors.</p><p>If it was an accident, then it's unfortunate, of course. But bloggers have been quick to express skepticism and call it a suicide attempt -- and not just because it's a juicier version of the story. Capriati has admitted to struggling with depression and suicidal thoughts. As a teen superstar, she faced fame and pressure at a young age much like a child actor does, and we all know how those stories often end. At 17, she was caught shoplifting, and a few months later she was arrested for marijuana possession. After a two-year hiatus from tennis, Capriati returned to the sport. The peak of her comeback came with her three Major victories in 2001 and 2002.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/jennifer_capriati_drug_overdose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/jennifer_capriati_drug_overdose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>70-68 in 5th set: Isner wins longest tennis match in history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/longest_tennis_match_ever_wimbledon_isner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/longest_tennis_match_ever_wimbledon_isner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/24/longest_tennis_match_ever_wimbledon_isner</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American finally pulls out Wimbledon win over Mahut after play is suspended for darkness two nights in a row]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Isner has won the longest match in tennis history, taking the fifth set against Nicolas Mahut 70-68.</p><p>The first-round match at Wimbledon took 11 hours, 5 minutes over three days. Isner closed out the victory Thursday with a backhand winner, then collapsed to his back as he tossed his racket in jubilation and relief.</p><p>Isner won 6-4, 3-6, 6-7 (7), 7-6 (3), 70-68.</p><p>The match lasted so long it was suspended because of darkness &#8212; two nights in a row. Play resumed Thursday at 59-all and continued for more than an hour before Isner won.</p><p>The American finished with 112 aces, and Mahut had 103. There were only three service breaks in the match, the last coming on the final point.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>WIMBLEDON, England (AP) &#8212; Briton Andy Murray won his second-round match at Wimbledon and an ovation from the queen.</p><p>With Queen Elizabeth II visiting the All England Club for the first time since 1977, Murray defeated Jarkko Nieminen of Finland on Centre Court, 6-3, 6-4, 6-2.</p><p>Murray, seeded fourth, is trying to become the first British player to win Wimbledon since the queen watched Virginia Wade win the women's final 33 years ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/longest_tennis_match_ever_wimbledon_isner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/24/longest_tennis_match_ever_wimbledon_isner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epic Wimbledon match, inspired writing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/isner_and_mahut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/isner_and_mahut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/06/23/isner_and_mahut</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ongoing Isner-Mahut bout -- already Wimbledon's longest match -- might have grown dull, but one blogger didn't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writer Xan Brooks' first mention of the match on the Guardian's Wimbledon blog was routine enough:</p><blockquote> <p><strong>2:45 p.m</strong>.: ...Nicolas Mahut and John Isner are locked in a marathon at 5-5 in the final set.</p> </blockquote><p>Six-and-a-half hours later, the match itself would be called because of darkness at 59-59 tied in the last set. Not only is the match -- over 10 hours spread out over two days already -- the longest of all time, the last set alone is longer than any previous match. Undoubtedly a testament to two supreme athletes -- the American Isner and the Frenchman Mahut -- by the time it was called it had devolved into an epically dull war of wills, booming serves and lumbering moves along the baseline.</p><p>The better action was really over on Brooks' blog. Checking in on his coverage throughout the afternoon proved the best ticket of the day:</p><blockquote> <p><strong>4.05pm</strong>: The Isner-Mahut battle is a bizarre mix of the gripping and the deadly dull. It's tennis's equivalent of Waiting For Godot, in which two lowly journeymen comedians are forced to remain on an outside court until hell freezes over and the sun falls from the sky. Isner and Mahut are dying a thousand deaths out there on Court 18 and yet nobody cares, because they're watching the football. So the players stand out on their baseline and belt aces past each-other in a fifth set that has already crawled past two hours. They are now tied at 18-games apiece.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/isner_and_mahut/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/isner_and_mahut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Venus Williams&#8217; scandalous French Open outfit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/venus_williams_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/venus_williams_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/05/24/venus_williams</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tennis star took to the court in a lacy number and barely-there panties. Oh, and she also won]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She's done it again. Venus Williams has caused another sartorial storm with her <a href="http://tennis.fanhouse.com/2010/05/24/venus-williams-french-open-outfit-creates-buzz/">French Open outfit.</a> She&#160;took to the court Sunday in a self-designed outfit that looked like a cross between a Frederick's of Hollywood nightie and a cancan costume. Underneath the lacy black and red getup, she wore a pair of underwear carefully matched to her skin color -- just like the pair she wore earlier this year at the Australian Open, and that&#160;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/24/venus-williams-french-ope_n_586760.html">inspired speculation</a> about whether she had gone commando. This latest fashion choice made for quite the photo opportunity and sent her name flying to the top of Google's hottest searches.</p><p>I might congratulate Williams on her attention-getting abilities -- only, it's her other accomplishment this weekend that is truly deserving of praise: While photographers were scrambling to get just the right upskirt shot, she whupped her opponent,&#160;Patty Schnyder of Switzerland. You gotta give it to her:&#160;Williams is maintaining her number two world ranking while dressed for the Moulin Rouge.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/venus_williams_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/venus_williams_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tempest in a tennis skirt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/venus_williams_no_underpants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/venus_williams_no_underpants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/01/25/venus_williams_no_underpants</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Venus Williams solves the mystery of her disappearing underpants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fans were scandalized last week by Venus Williams' clothing -- or lack thereof -- during the Australian Open. As her skirt flew up with every leap, bend and backhand, viewers were treated to what appeared to be a jaw-dropping display of skin.&#160;Bloggers where quick to ask the question on every viewer's mind: <em>Did she just go commando on the court?</em> Some even&#160;<a href="http://deadspin.com/5452285/did-venus-go-commando/gallery/">helpfully presented</a> an array of photographic evidence in order to get to the bottom, so to speak, of this mystery.</p><p>Thankfully, we can now return to our <a href="http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&amp;client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=tennis%20upskirt&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wv#">regularly scheduled lechery</a>, because Williams&#160;<a href="http://twitter.com/venusESWilliams">took to Twitter</a> to settle this debate once and for all: "I am wearing undershorts the same color as my skin, so it gives the slits in my dress the full effect!" She designed the skin-tight, curve-accentuating shorts herself and, as Tennis FanHouse <a href="http://tennis.fanhouse.com/2010/01/24/venus-baring-act-just-an-illusion/">reports</a>, Williams explained that "the whole idea is just an illusion" of being bare-bottomed. Well, I'm not sure why you would want to, but there is no question you successfully pulled off that trick, Venus.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/venus_williams_no_underpants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/venus_williams_no_underpants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year in celebrity meltdowns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/meltdown_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/meltdown_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tila Tequila]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2009/12/29/meltdown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Temper Fi! When stars attack, or otherwise go nuts in public, we love it -- often more than we love their work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Norman Bates once observed, "We all go a little mad sometimes." And whether you're a celebrity or demi celebrity or a person we can't quite remember why we're following on Twitter, conditions were ripe this year to go a little mad -- and then keep right on going.</p><p>Surely our bottomless appetite for the spectacle of attractive, well-compensated people messing up helped create a perfect storm of giving the people what they want. Had any episodes of disoriented staggering around lately, Amy Winehouse? No? How about now? OK, we'll just stand outside rummaging through your garbage until you do.</p><p>And so, as we sat at our laptops this year, aggressively hitting the refresh button on TMZ, we waited and watched for our icons to go off their meds, to lose their shit and to generally behave in a manner confounding, larger than life and just plain nuts. They did not disappoint.</p><p>     <strong>Christian Bale</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/meltdown_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/30/meltdown_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crying foul on Martina Navratilova</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tennis star's legal woes remind us that even gay icons have some growing up to do about same-sex marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A famous multimillionaire athlete falls in love. He invites his new girlfriend to live and travel with him; he registers hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of property and assets in her name; he lavishes her with gifts, assures her of his undying love and even goes so far as to marry her in a private ceremony. Eight years later, the athlete has cast his wife out of his life, denied her every financial claim and left her with little more than the clothes on her back.</p><p>Here&#8217;s a question. Would any court in the land deny this wife restitution? And in the court of public opinion, would anyone take the side of a husband so stingy and unfeeling?</p><p>Let us now switch the husband&#8217;s gender. He is now a she: a lesbian tennis star willing to use the legal system to extract herself from another unhappy relationship. This makes the case more complicated, to be sure, but it does nothing to alter the injustice. And, if anything, the outrage should be greater.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>158</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good riddance, baseball</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/baseball_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/baseball_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/olympics/feature/2008/08/13/baseball</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great sport, but the Olympics are right to give it the boot. Tennis should go too. But not softball. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love baseball. I love the Olympics. Baseball's getting kicked out of the Olympics. I'm glad. </p><p>Softball, which I don't love, is also getting kicked out. I'm sad about that. Life's complicated. </p><p>As much as I enjoy the chance to watch the mostly non-elite minor-league prospects who make up the U.S. team -- seriously; I'm nerdy like that -- I agree with the International Olympic Committee's decision to drop the sport after Beijing. </p><p>Because the U.S. major leagues rightly refuse to interrupt their schedule to allow players to go the Olympics, Olympic baseball is missing most of the world's best players. Big-league teams are reluctant to let their top minor-leaguers go to the Olympics, so the games don't even really work as a treat for prospect hounds. The U.S. team features a few top guys, such as Matt LaPorta and Trevor Cahill, but it's dominated by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_baseball_jargon_(A)#AAAA_player">Quadruple-A types</a> like Nate Schierholtz and Jayson Nix. </p><p>Baseball also requires a specialized stadium that in most cases becomes a white elephant the day after the last game because -- and this is another good reason -- there are large swathes of the world where baseball doesn't matter. Europe is one of those, and the Olympics have a European sensibility. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/baseball_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/baseball_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Returns, returns, returns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/14/returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/14/returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Nadal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/07/14/returns</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This column's back, Favre still won't go, and did you see Nadal vs. Federer?

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where were we? Ah, yes, <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/07/02/favre/index.html">Brett Favre.</a> </p><p>This column's alleged <a href="http://letters.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/07/02/favre/permalink/11e227cf2bbf5043ee2cc3bc89a43d50.html">favorite subject</a> just keeps giving, doesn't he? When last we spoke, ESPN's Chris Mortensen was just reporting that Favre wanted to play again, according to sources close to the quarterback and the Green Bay Packers. </p><p>That story has borne out, and now Favre's in a game of diva chess with the team, having asked for his release so he can sign somewhere else because he's not feeling the love radiating properly from Green Bay. The Packers have said he can come back to hold a clipboard for Aaron Rodgers if he wants to. Oh, snap! The club knows he wants no such thing. It's a standoff for the moment. </p><p>What the Packers would really like is for Favre to go away and stay away. Come back to get his number retired, talk to the team before a big game now and then. But not go away just any old way. If the Packers release him, he could go sign with an NFC North rival -- the division isn't exactly brimming with All-Pro quarterbacks these days -- and come back twice a year to haunt the Packers as a Lion, Bear or Viking. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/07/14/returns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/14/returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorenstam, Henin quit while they&#8217;re ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/05/15/retirement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The premier female golfer of her generation and the No. 1 tennis player in the world retire on consecutive days. Is something up?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the setup of some oddball espionage flick: On consecutive days, the world's top-ranked women's golf and tennis players announce their retirement. Who is retiring the great female sports stars of the world? </p><p>Annika Sorenstam said Tuesday that she'll be ending her career at the end of the golf season. On Wednesday, in a much bigger shocker, world No. 1 tennis player Justine Henin, two weeks shy of her 26th birthday and not injured, said she's walking away from the game effective immediately. She's the first player ever to quit at No. 1. </p><p>Imagine if Tiger Woods and Roger Federer had announced their retirements on consecutive days. They'd knock the NBA and NHL playoffs off the front pages for a week. </p><p>The bizarre coincidence of the timing of their announcements aside, Sorenstam and Henin's retirements don't have much in common. It would be easy to clump them together and ponder what it is that's forcing the top women out of their sports early. But it might not be all that fruitful. Sorenstam and Henin are separate cases. </p><p>Sorenstam is 37 and at a more logical point in her career to step away than Henin, especially since she's soon to be married for a second time and says she wants to have a baby. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King Kaufman&#8217;s Sports Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/03/thursday_40/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/03/thursday_40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/col/kaufman/2008/01/03/thursday</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panel o' Experts tie! Schlereth, Zillgitt share prestigious championship, earn dinner at columnist's house. Plus: Wait, Year in Sports was even worse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Schlereth of ESPN and Jeff Zillgitt of USA Today are the champions of this year's <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/nfl/">NFL</a> Panel o' Experts, having correctly picked the winner of 171 of the 256 regular-season games played in 2007. Their victory -- by three games over you, the teeming masses, as represented by Yahoo's users -- entitles them to a valuable prize that has been won by many and claimed by none: dinner at my house. </p><p>This is the second straight tie and the fifth time in the five-year history of the panel that an ESPN expert has won at least a share of the title. That's not surprising given that the four-letter has at times made up about half of the panel and even in this year's expanded field accounts for a third of the players. </p><p>Zillgitt, like USA Today colleagues Jarrett Bell and Larry Weisman a first-time entrant this year, rallied in Week 17 to catch Schlereth at the wire, going 12-4 while Schlereth went 11-5. </p><p>Mike Golic shared the championship with Charles Robinson of Yahoo Sports last year. The other winners were Ron Jaworski in 2003 and Sean Salisbury in 2004 and '05, the only repeat winner. Jaworski had the highest winning percentage this year, but since he didn't pick a winner in any of the Monday night games he announced for ESPN television, he finished in a tie for seventh place. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/03/thursday_40/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/03/thursday_40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year in sports</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/30/year_in_sports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/30/year_in_sports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/feature/2007/12/30/year_in_sports</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were some great moments in 2007, but it was a year of death and a steady rain of scandal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The year in <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/sports/">sports</a> started a few hours earlier in 2007 than it usually does, and it started as badly as a year can start. Darrent Williams, an up-and-coming Broncos cornerback, was shot to death outside a Denver nightclub following a dispute at a New Year's Eve party. He died in the arms of teammate Javon Walker. He was 24. </p><p>Later that New Year's Day at the Fiesta Bowl in Glendale, Ariz., <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/col/kaufman/2007/01/02/tuesday/">Boise State beat Oklahoma</a> 43-42 in overtime. The ridiculously thrilling upset -- which featured three touchdowns in the last 86 seconds, a hook-and-ladder play and, on the game-winning two-point conversion, a Statue of Liberty play -- was one of the greatest <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/college_football/">college football</a> games ever played. </p><p>So it goes? Good with the bad. Cycle of life. A rainbow for every storm-cloud and a birth for <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/col/kaufman/2007/02/27/tuesday/index.html">every death.</a> </p><p>If only. </p><p>How many great games and thrilling moments would have been needed to make up for all of 2007's tragedies? More than any year can provide. There were some nice moments in 2007, but it was a year of death and a steady rain of scandal. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/12/30/year_in_sports/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/30/year_in_sports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
