<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Aleppo Codex&#8221;: The bizarre history of a precious book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/the_aleppo_codex_the_bizarre_history_of_a_precious_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/the_aleppo_codex_the_bizarre_history_of_a_precious_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12919242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A reporter traces the shadowy fate of the definitive version of the Hebrew Bible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ancient and priceless book, a murky history of evasions and coverups, an underground of sinister and possibly violent dealers, a former spy who drops tantalizing hints and a wily 84-year-old millionaire who says stuff like, "The problem with this story is that it could damage your health": Are these the ingredients for a cheesy, improbable historical thriller? Yet <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9781616200404%26">"The Aleppo Codex,"</a> Matti Friedman's account of his attempts to learn the history of one of the world's most precious books, sports all of these assets, and it's nonfiction. If reporting this story damaged Friedman's health, it probably happened when he realized what he'd stumbled into and his reporter's heart started beating in doubletime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/the_aleppo_codex_the_bizarre_history_of_a_precious_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/the_aleppo_codex_the_bizarre_history_of_a_precious_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History Channel hires reality show guru for Bible series</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/bible_reality_tv_history_channel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/bible_reality_tv_history_channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survivor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/24/bible_reality_tv_history_channel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Survivor" producer Mark Burnett tackles noncontroversial religious text, promises no historical context]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The History Channel: not just for documentaries about Hitler anymore. In an effort to appeal to those millions of Americans who would rather watch contestants eat dung in a jungle with Jeff Probst egging them on than watch another documentary about something that happened before they were born, the channel has brought in reality show producer <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/24/arts/television/reality-tv-producer-mark-burnett-tackles-the-bible.html">Mark Burnett to create a 12-hour scripted drama about the Bible</a>.&#160;Previously, Burnett's biggest shows to date have been "Survivor," "The Apprentice" and "The Voice"... all of which sound like Sunday school stories themselves when you stop to think about it.</p><p>But just in case putting Bible stories on the History Channel makes you feel a little icky, don't worry. The series will be <em>entirely free of historical context</em>, according the network's president.</p><blockquote>
<p>The Bible has its own layers of interpretation, of course, but Ms. Dubuc said the series would not try to impose any kind of historical context to events like the Flood. "It is just the magnitude of the book itself," she said. "We&#8217;re not stepping back to examine anything that could be called a controversy. We are just telling the stories that are in it."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/bible_reality_tv_history_channel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/bible_reality_tv_history_channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Frey does Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the faux-memoirist thinks he'll offend anyone by depicting Christ as a whoring drunk, he'll be disappointed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently James Frey has a tiny man in his head, like some kind of internalized boss, who barks, "You haven't enraged anyone lately!" and starts cracking the whip whenever things slow down. This week, we learned that Frey will deliver a book he discussed in an interview with the Rumpus back in 2008, "The Final Testament of the Holy Bible," which will depict the return of Jesus Christ as a drunk who consorts with hookers and canoodles with other men. The book will be published in a limited edition by an art gallery and self-published by Frey "online," which presumably means in e-book format. This event will take place on April 22, Good Friday.</p><p>I know! Shocking, right? Frey says that he expects to "get blasted" for this. The press has happily joined him in rubbing its hands together over the prospect, deploying words like "controversial" and "firestorm" in stories that Frey promptly posts to his website. "I tried to write a radical book. I'm releasing it in a radical way," Frey told the New York Post. So it's possible his Christ might be a skateboarder, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Rise and Fall of the Bible&#8221;: Rethinking the Good Book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/13/rise_and_fall_of_bible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/13/rise_and_fall_of_bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/02/13/rise_and_fall_of_bible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American Christians buy millions of Bibles they seldom read and don't understand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I found myself explaining to a group of surprised friends from Protestant and secular backgrounds that, despite being educated in the Catholic faith up to the sacrament of confirmation at age 14, I didn't read the Old Testament until I was assigned it in a college literature course. Traditionally, the Catholic Church did not encourage its congregation to read the Bible; we had the priests to explain it to us. In fact, the church once took such a dim view of the idea that, in 1536, the English reformer William Tyndale was tried for heresy, strangled and burned at the stake, largely for translating the Bible into English for a lay readership. Tyndale House, a major American Christian publisher, is named after him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/13/rise_and_fall_of_bible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/13/rise_and_fall_of_bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>223</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;3 Hebrew Boys&#8221; get decades in prison</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_sc_investment_scam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_sc_investment_scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/14/us_sc_investment_scam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trio of investors are convicted of fleecing $80 million out of clients they promised they'd make fortunes for]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three men who called themselves the "3 Hebrew Boys" and were convicted of fleecing thousands of people out of more than $80 million were sentenced Tuesday to decades in federal prison.</p><p>U.S. District Judge Margaret Seymour on Tuesday sentenced Joseph Brunson and Timothy McQueen to 27 years in prison and Tony Pough to 30 years. They also were ordered to repay $82 million in restitution.</p><p>The men were convicted in 2009 on nearly 60 charges each. The men told clients they could make amazing returns in currency markets but actually invested less than $1 out of every $10,000 they were given. Prosecutors say they used the cash for cars and houses.</p><p>The three remained defiant Tuesday, telling the judge they didn't think they did anything wrong and were only trying to help people.</p><p>The "3 Hebrew Boys" took their name from a Biblical tale about two believers in God who survived being tossed into a fiery furnace because of their faith. In their pitch, they told investors they had been through the flames of crushing debt and survived, thanks to their secret investments and the power of God.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_sc_investment_scam/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_sc_investment_scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And God said to Noah: Don&#8217;t fret about global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/john_shimkus_god_and_noah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/john_shimkus_god_and_noah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/11/09/john_shimkus_god_and_noah</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Republican seeking to chair the House Energy committee explains why devastating climate is impossible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in March 2009, when Nancy Pelosi ruled the House of Representatives with an iron fist, one could chuckle at Republicans who came to committee hearings quoting scripture as the rationale for their positions on energy policy.</p><p>But now, when one of those very same Republicans is <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1110/Shimkus_seeks_Energy_and_Commerce_chairmanship.html">in the running for the chairmanship of the House Energy and Commerce committee,</a> it just doesn't seem so funny.</p><p>Juan Cole <a href="http://www.juancole.com/2010/11/energy-committee-chairman-candidate-says-god-promised-no-more-catastrophic-climate-change-after-noah.html">does us the unpleasant service</a> of bringing back to life the comments of John Shimkus, R-Ill., a year and a half ago.</p><p>Shimkus starts by quoting Genesis 8, Verses 21 and 22, in which God makes Noah a promise.</p><blockquote>
<p>Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though all inclinations of his heart are evil from childhood and never again will I destroy all living creatures as I have done.</p>
<p>As long as the earth endures, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will never cease.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/john_shimkus_god_and_noah/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/09/john_shimkus_god_and_noah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actual verses from the &#8220;Conservative Bible&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/08/conservative_bible_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/08/conservative_bible_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/08/conservative_bible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, truth really is stranger than fiction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we came up with some <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/feature/2009/10/06/conservative_bible/">satirical contributions</a> to Conservapedia's "<a href="http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project">Conservative Bible Project</a>" earlier this week, we went deliberately over the top.</p><p>Sure, Andy Schlafly and his compatriots went pretty far out there in coming up with the idea to produce a more conservative version of the Bible, one free of the liberal bias they see in contemporary translations. But we didn't think they'd go anywhere as far as we did with things like our "conservative" version of Matthew 5:21-22, "You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'You shall not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.' But I tell you that a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do, so git 'er done."</p><p>Well, they sure showed us.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/08/conservative_bible_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/08/conservative_bible_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>146</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon fixes the Bible&#8217;s liberal bias</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/06/conservative_bible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/06/conservative_bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/feature/2009/10/06/conservative_bible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A right-wing Web site is working on a new conservative version of the Bible; we offer some suggestions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art r">
    <img class='wp-image-10061420' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/10/story4.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Salon composite/Wikipedia</p><p>Liberal bias can be found in the unlikeliest of places these days, and it's often the people you'd least suspect who are responsible for it. Who, after all, would suspect England's King James I, who ruled in the 17th century, of leaving the version of the Bible that he commissioned open to subversion by Marxists?</p><p>The folks at Conservapedia, that's who. The Web site founded by Phyllis Schlafly's son Andrew as an alternative to Wikipedia, which <a href="http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:About">bills itself</a> as the only "encyclopedic resource on the internet [that] is free of corruption by liberal untruths." It has started what it's calling the "<a href="http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project">Conservative Bible Project</a>," because, the article on the project explains, "Liberal bias has become the single biggest distortion in modern Bible translations."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/06/conservative_bible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/06/conservative_bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>195</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Commandments judge snags Chuck Norris endorsement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/norris_moore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/norris_moore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/08/27/norris_moore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alabama's Roy Moore loves powerful bearded guys who choose who lives and who dies, and they love him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a match made in Heaven: On the one hand, we've got Chuck Norris. The guy&#8217;s definitely got a type. The bearded martial artist and inadvertent ironic cultural phenomenon made his first major political <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDUQW8LUMs8">appearances</a> for then-presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, the evangelical standard-bearer in the 2008 presidential campaign. On the other hand, we've got Roy Moore. The former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Moore was <a href="http://www.al.com/specialreport/?111303moore.html">removed from office</a> in 2003 after defying court orders to remove a monument to the Ten Commandments he'd had installed at the court. Now he's running for governor, and guess whose <a href="http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/08/chuck_norris_martial_arts_star.html">endorsement</a> he just landed?</p><p>Of course, there's no surprise, really. Norris, a columnist these days for <a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=274">WorldNetDaily</a>, loves conservative evangelical candidates -- see Huckabee, Mike. And Moore loves bearded guys who have power over life and death and can move the Earth -- see God, Almighty.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/norris_moore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/norris_moore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/15/kings_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/15/kings_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2009/03/15/kings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The royal treatment: NBC's "Kings" is a rare and beautiful thing -- cinematic, poetic, ambitious television on prime time network TV. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;During hard times, we hunger for the reassurances of fate. We long for some divine force to guide us through a cruel, unpredictable world, to indicate, through some glorious and elegant spectacle, that we'll make it through the storm.</p><p>Here in America, for all of our democratic ideals, we're more than happy to treat our leader like royalty, so long as he has the stature and dignity to deserve our adoration. Because, just as a bumbling frat boy who stumbles on his words and blithely drops bombs on nonbelievers can make the entire world look like a hardened, messy, incomprehensible hell, a graceful, eloquent man seems to magically transform our planet into a shiny, hopeful place populated by humble, pure-hearted people who have the courage to believe that they'll make it through the darkness. Even the atheists among us relish the sense that some eternal, celestial force has finally descended, to cure our blindness and set us free.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/03/15/kings_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/15/kings_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WTF: &#8220;The Patriarchy Movement&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/26/patriarchy_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/26/patriarchy_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/01/26/patriarchy_movement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An evangelical feminism tries to roll back the clock and inject a little biblical womanhood into our lives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remove thy shoes and get thee to the kitchen! According to <a href="http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/121603/women%27s_%27liberation%27_through_submission%3A_an_evangelical_anti-feminism_is_born_/">Alternet</a>, there's a burgeoning "patriarchy movement" that urges women to reclaim (or, rather, submit to) traditional gender roles as described in the Bible. But this isn't some wackadoo males-only organization; the movement is led and supported by women who consider themselves to be "a revolutionary body waging 'countercultural' rebellion against what they see as the feminist status quo."</p><p>So far, only 3,000 names have been signed to the "True Women" manifesto. (Hmm, "True Woman." Is that anything like "Real American"?) But they're hoping to get 100,000 women to pledge their faith to a life of "biblical femininity."</p><p>According to the manifesto, a True Woman is called to "affirm and encourage men as they seek to express godly masculinity" and responds "humbly to male leadership" demonstrating "noble submission to authority." Still hesitant to sign your name? How about the belief that "Selfish insistence on personal rights is contrary to the spirit of Christ." If that sounds like a page out of pre-feminist history, that's the point.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/26/patriarchy_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/26/patriarchy_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holy Constitution!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/huckabee_23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/huckabee_23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2008/01/18/huckabee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee's affinity for religious extremism is no secret. But is biblical law at the heart of his presidential vision?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behind the happy, healthy, guitar-strumming campaign style that has so besotted the national press corps, <a href= http://dir.salon.com/topics/mike_huckabee/>Mike Huckabee</a> looks like something considerably less charming -- a zealous proponent of the "biblical" reformation of every aspect of American society. </p><p>If that sounds too extreme and aggressive to describe the smiling Huck -- who introduced himself to the country as "a conservative, but I'm not angry about it" -- then consider how he explained his urge to revamp the nation's founding document. At a public forum on the eve of the Michigan primary, while <a href=http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/15/579265.aspx>mocking Republican opponents</a> who don't want to append a "marriage amendment" or a "life amendment" to the Constitution, he said: "I believe it's a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/huckabee_23/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/huckabee_23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The atheist delusion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/19/john_haught/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/19/john_haught/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atoms and Eden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/12/18/john_haught</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Theologian John Haught explains why science and God are not at odds, why Mike Huckabee worries him, and why Richard Dawkins and other "new atheists" are ignorant about religion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolution remains the thorniest issue in the ongoing debate over <a href=http://dir.salon.com/topics/science/>science</a> and <a href=http://dir.salon.com/topics/religion/>religion.</a> But for all the yelling between creationists and scientists, there's one perspective that's largely absent from public discussions about evolution. We rarely hear from religious believers who accept the standard Darwinian account of evolution. It's a shame because there's an important question at stake: How can a person of faith reconcile the apparently random, meaningless process of evolution with belief in God? </p><p>The simplest response is to say that science and religion have nothing to do with each other -- to claim, as Stephen Jay Gould famously did, that they are "non-overlapping magisteria." But perhaps that response seems too easy, a politically expedient ploy to pacify both scientists and mainstream Christians. Maybe evolutionary theory, along with modern physics, does pose a serious challenge to religious belief. To put it another way, how can an intellectually responsible person of faith justify that faith -- and even belief in a personal God -- after Darwin and Einstein? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/12/19/john_haught/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/19/john_haught/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>627</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney and Huckabee&#8217;s religious intolerance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/07/religion_presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/07/religion_presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2007/12/07/religion_presidency</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonbelievers have long been more tolerant of believers in office than the other way around.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Distasteful as all the Bible thumping and ostentatious piety of the Republican presidential aspirants certainly are, the time may have come to address their religious pretensions directly, instead of turning away in mild disgust. For the truth is that no matter how often candidates like <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/mitt_romney/">Mitt Romney</a> and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/mike_huckabee/">Mike Huckabee</a> promise to uphold the Constitution and protect religious freedom, they are clearly seeking to impose the restrictive tests of faith that the nation's founders abhorred. </p><p>The most egregious offender against basic American civics today is Huckabee, who told a group of students at Liberty University, the center of higher learning founded by the late <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/jerry_falwell/">Jerry Falwell,</a> that his sudden rise in the Iowa polls is an act of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/god/">God.</a> He compared the improvement in his political fortunes to the New Testament miracle of the loaves and fishes. He wasn't joking, as both his demeanor and his words demonstrated. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/12/07/religion_presidency/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/07/religion_presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>238</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My favorite pornography</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/03/home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/03/home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/garrison_keillor//2007/10/03/home</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to pore over the Sunday real estate ads and imagine how happy I'd be in that beach cottage on Antigua. But they don't call to me anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sitting in Cleveland, waiting for a plane, I reached in my pocket for scrap paper to write a phone number on and found the epistle for last Sunday. St. Paul said, "As for those who in the present day are rich, command them not to be haughty, or to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but rather on God who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment," which makes sense as the dollar falls and the price of oil rises and the auto business heads south and the housing market shudders and suddenly nobody is quite sure how much the house is worth and the slow-motion disaster of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/iraq/">Iraq</a> grinds on and on, the Arctic ice cap has shrunk by a million square miles, so we'd better start learning to enjoy long walks in the woods, apples and flirting, all the God-given pleasures. We face uncertain times. </p><p>Those of us brought up on the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_bible/">Bible</a> remember the parable of the rich man in hell and the beggar Lazarus in paradise, and yet we still do enjoy fine restaurants and four-star hotels -- though we see flames licking at the windows -- because it takes a hardscrabble upbringing to truly appreciate the home beautiful, the exquisite salad, the bison rib-eye in mushroom sauce, the braised tomatoes. As Emily Dickinson said, "To comprehend a nectar requires sorest need." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/10/03/home/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/03/home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ice Age 2: Judgment Day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/03/iceage2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/03/iceage2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2006/04/03/iceage2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Animated woolly mammoths, the Bible and climate change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<b>Warning: Some "Ice Age: The Meltdown" spoilers ahead.</b>) </p><p>By now, pretty much anyone who cares (and just about everyone who has a small child, judging by <a target="new" href="http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1745782,00.html">the boffo box office</a> numbers this past weekend) knows that global warming is the driving plot device of the animated movice "Ice Age 2." As allegories for our current climate-change times, it's about as obvious as a melting glacier in Greenland. Our lovable motley crew of neolithic beasts live in a valley precariously protected from towering masses of water by a huge ice dam. Temperatures are rising; doom threatens. And that's about it for a story line, aside from whether or not two neurotic mammoths are <i>ever</i> going to get it on. </p><p>But really, what more does one need for a passable narrative than the threat of an all-consuming apocalypse? Despite its plot weaknesses, "Ice Age 2" is amusing, especially if you are an 8-year-old boy. </p><p>However, if you are a 43-year-old secular humanist, you might be perplexed. Early on in the movie, an evil vulture cruelly informs the animals of the valley that, yes, a great flood is coming. But if the animals can get to the other side of the valley, there is a boat waiting that will save them. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/04/03/iceage2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/03/iceage2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holy Mary, mother of women&#8217;s studies?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/27/feminist_bible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/27/feminist_bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/02/27/feminist_bible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A feminist theologian makes Bible study safe for politically empowered women.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you looking to leech the patriarchy out of your Bible studies, Broadsheet presents Phyllis Trible, a feminist theologian <a target="new" href="http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1137834339994&path=!localnews!localgov!&s=">profiled</a> this weekend in the Winston-Salem Journal. The author of four books on the feminist interpretation of the Good Book, Trible tells the paper, "So many women have an interest in or commitment to the Bible, but they struggle with it." Trible began her quest because, according to the Journal, "people told her that the Bible and feminism were enemies  Many of the women in the Bible are almost silent, or they are abused, raped or otherwise mistreated." </p><p> But Trible has sought out the exceptions, or at least the reinterpretations, starting with Eve, who she argues is an active participant in the story of the downfall of Eden. (Hmm, yeah, definitely active. But not so much in a <i>good</i> way.) Trible points out that at least Eve was the perceptive partner when it came to her observations about that tempting apple tree. Adam "just eats  He doesn't speak out," Trible says. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/02/27/feminist_bible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/27/feminist_bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fine art of revenge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/20/miller_45/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/20/miller_45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2006/02/20/miller</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A legal scholar says that "eye for an eye" justice is a lot more humane than you think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When William Ian Miller, professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School, came to the phone to talk about his new book, "Eye for an Eye," he was, he confessed, "wired." "I've been talking to my students about the Icelandic sagas!" he said. Miller -- known in literary circles for such provocative, unclassifiable books as "The Anatomy of Disgust" and Salon favorite <a href="http://archive.salon.com/books/int/2000/10/25/miller/">"The Mystery of Courage"</a> -- cut his scholarly teeth on the sagas, and he thinks we modern types don't give the harsh but heroic societies that produced them enough respect. "Eye for an Eye" describes how justice worked in Medieval Iceland and England, and in the biblical world that formulated the most familiar version of the law of the "talion." It's defined by the American Heritage Dictionary as "a punishment identical to the offense." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/02/20/miller_45/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/20/miller_45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let us prey</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/06/hypocrites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/06/hypocrites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2006/01/06/hypocrites</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff and his deeply religious right-wing cronies express their "biblical worldview" by swindling Indian tribes and bribing legislators. Verily, mysterious are the ways of the Lord.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that such whited sepulchers as <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/01/05/gingrich/index.html">Newt Gingrich</a> have denounced the betrayal of the Republican revolution and the evils of congressional corruption, what more can be said about Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed, Tom DeLay and all the other politicians, operatives and bagmen implicated in their schemes? Perhaps it is worth expressing a small hope that the good religious people of this country will rise up in outrage against the abuse of their faith by all these pious hypocrites. </p><p> Rarely has the contrast between the rhetoric of the religious right and the behavior of its leaders been so starkly exposed as in the Abramoff scandal. The most obvious example was the manipulation of Christian activists in Louisiana and Texas by Reed, former executive director of the Christian Coalition, who said he was helping them fight gambling when he was actually using them to promote Indian casinos (and to make a few million bucks for himself). </p><p> That episode alone should have alerted honest Christians to the moral rot within the Republican leadership that professed to represent their interests. But there is of course much more evidence of the religious cynicism of Abramoff and his cronies. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/01/06/hypocrites/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/06/hypocrites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A spiritual three-ring circus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/27/billy_graham_crusade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/27/billy_graham_crusade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/06/27/billy_graham_crusade</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billy Graham's last crusade, at Shea Stadium, was a lot tamer than the fire-breathing revivals of my youth -- but the crowd was a lot more interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Brothers and sisters: This weekend, the good and holy reverend who is called Billy Graham came to Queens, N.Y., and yea, I was there. The reverend descended upon Flushing Meadows Corona Park and I beared witness whilst a few miles away my roommate Mario threweth a Gay Pride party in our West Village apartment. And, lo, the incongruity of the two events didst not surprise me out as much as I thought it wouldth. But everything else did.</i> </p><p align="right"> -- Book of Me, Chapter 2, Verse 23 </p><p>When I hopped on the No. 7 train to Shea Stadium to join several thousand people to hear what was ostensibly the 86-year-old Billy Graham's last series of sermons, I was expecting an old-time Christian revival, but that wasn't what I got. I was also expecting the fiery orator I grew up with as a Southern Baptist evangelical in small-town Alabama, but I didn't exactly get that, either. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/27/billy_graham_crusade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/27/billy_graham_crusade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

