<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The Hack List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_hack_list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 1: Politico</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim VandeHei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Home of the campaign's loudest, least essential journalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Surprise! It's Politico.</p><p>I have <a href="http://www.thebaffler.com/past/come_on_feel_the_buzz">written tens of thousands of words</a> on what, precisely, is wrong with Politico. But I can put the case much more simply here: It's Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 2: The Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The capital's daily paper is the one with the worst opinion section in the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>The Washington Post is the hometown paper of the city that everyone in America hates, usually for good reason. And the things Americans hate about that city and the people who work there are reflected in its pages.</p><p>The newspaper itself is an ever smaller and more starved-looking thing. The people running it used to actually compete with the New York Times, for readers and writers and national influence. Now they can't really decide if they even want to try.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 3: Newsweek</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niall Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tina Brown's magazine trolled itself to death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>One shouldn't speak ill of the dead, I know. But if Newsweek has taught me anything this year, it's that death is not truly the end, because <a href="http://www.theweek.co.uk/media/49493/newsweek-%E2%80%98hits-new-low-%E2%80%98heaven-real-cover">Heaven Is Real, According to Science.</a></p><p>Yes, that was an actual, for-real Newsweek cover this year: "Heaven Is Real." It was the dumbest, probably, but not actually the worst. This year's Newsweek covers also included <a href="http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/violence-against-women/newsweek-glamorizes-women-s-submission">naked bondage lady</a>, and <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/184397/newsweeks-asparagus-cover-only-the-latest-recycling/">sexy lady about to fellate asparagus</a> (a stock image that had also quite recently been used in at least two other magazines). There was <a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/216792/newsweeks-creepy-princess-diana-cover">"what if Princess Di was alive and my friend,"</a> too, but that was from 2011.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 4: The Sunday Shows</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where the same few hacks and camera-seeking lawmakers have the same discussions every. single. week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Every Sunday morning, the big four broadcast networks all air their FCC-mandated "public affairs" programming, which consists of a host (a white guy) interviewing the same dozen lawmakers, journalists and pundits in a rotating order. The lawmakers are usually not the most powerful members of Congress -- often they're somewhat marginal figures in terms of influence, in fact -- and the pundits and journalists all generally share the same, or very similar, worldviews. The only people I actually know who watch these things <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/sunday-morning-talk-shows">do so out of professional obligation.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 5: The Drudge Report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drudge Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inaccurate as always, but thankfully more irrelevant than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Shortly after noon on Nov. 6, Time's Mark Halperin <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkHalperin/status/265873281272401920">posted this on Twitter:</a> "When John Harris &amp; I wrote 'Drudge rules our world,' we were describing what IS, not what ought to be. Doubters already proven wrong today." A few hours later Barack Obama won reelection, which I assume came as a shock to people who do get most of their news from Matt Drudge.</p><p>Here's a brief tour of 2012 as the Drudge Report covered it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 7: The Huffington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The great liberal community's infuriating founder embraces both the center and the fringe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Arianna Huffington is brilliant. Her intellect is usually ignored by her detractors, who focus on her relentless ambition. Old-fashioned sexism taints so many pieces critical of Huffington that one sometimes feels a strong urge to defend her from the charge that she's cannibalizing and destroying American journalism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 8: MSNBC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Russert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, the liberal answer to Fox actually makes for worse TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>MSNBC, we're told all the time, is the liberal Fox News. That's reductive and stupid. It isn't. MSNBC isn't the liberal Fox News for two very important reasons: It usually demonstrates a greater respect for the truth than Fox News, and it's <em>not as good as Fox News.</em> It's not as good at being liberal as Fox is at being conservative. Fox is rigidly ideologically consistent, with its "straight news" programs echoing the same talking points and pushing the same slanted stories as its opinion shows. While there's no doubt that MSNBC is more unapologetically liberal than it used to be, it's still all over the place, with a conservative anchoring its flagship morning show, objective Beltway "straight news" proponents like Chuck Todd and Andrea Mitchell dominating in the daytime, and weekends full of ... prison shows. But more important, it's not as good as Fox at being compelling TV, which is why millions more people watch Fox every day. (There are demographic reasons for Fox's advantage, too, but it's still a huge number.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 9: The Atlantic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The eternally unsurprising magazine may just be an excuse for the obscene "Ideas" events]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Magazines are great. I am a big fan of magazines. The Atlantic does a lot of things right, as a magazine. First of all, it makes money. Most magazines don't, really. I also give them credit for "figuring out The Web." Here is the secret of The Web: People like to read thoughtful people writing about and debating the issues of the day, and also they like really infuriating trolling. The Atlantic gives them both.</p><p>Here are some pieces <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/toc/2012/12/">from the latest issue</a>: Jeffrey Goldberg on why more guns will solve gun control (counterintuitive!), Jessica Bennett and Rachel Simmons on how writing "xoxo" in emails is "feminizing the workplace," something on wacky Silicon Valley workspaces and offices. This is a fairly representative sample of the sort of thing in your average issue of the Atlantic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 10: New York Times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Kristof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're kicking off our annual list with the best paper in the country -- which could do a lot better than these two]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>The New York Times is America's Last Newspaper, and because of that it is the recipient of a lot of grief that it doesn't always entirely deserve. Conservatives think it's the Daily Worker. Liberals blame it for Iraq and Bush's second term. Young people refuse to pay to read it.</p><p>The truth is, it is a good newspaper. It has great reporting that it spends a bunch of money on. It has a crossword puzzle. It has David Carr.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 6: CNN</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiolf Blitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The flailing cable news pioneer could be less dumb if it wanted to be -- but it doesn\'t want to be]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Maybe we beat up on poor CNN too often. I have previously <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/28/cnn_cant_even_do_breaking_news_right_anymore/">bemoaned CNN's inability to get breaking news right</a>, offered <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/30/how_to_save_cnn/">advice on how to save the network</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/cnn_hires_failed_gimmick_king_jeff_zucker/">offered constructive criticism of their decision to hire Jeff Zucker</a>. CNN was also well represented in 2011's Hack List, with <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/15_wolf_blitzer/">Wolf Blitzer</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/8_piers_morgan/">Piers Morgan</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/">Erick Erickson</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/4_erin_burnett/">Erin Burnett</a> all making appearances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andy Borowitz: Not funny</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/andy_borowitz_not_funny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/andy_borowitz_not_funny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Borowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12983693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did the creator of "The Fresh Prince" become America's foremost political satirist and teller of dad jokes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy Borowitz makes dad jokes for self-satisfied liberals. If you think Sarah Palin is stupid and Mitt Romney is rich, Andy Borowitz has some jokes that will decidedly not challenge a single one of your prior assumptions!</p><p>For some reason the man who created "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" is now America's foremost political satirist. Except he's not actually a satirist, he's a parodist. As a parodist he falls very short of the standard set by, say, (true American treasure) Weird Al. His milieu is "fake news," which is a very crowded field. But Borowitz is a one-man fake news machine, producing with soothing predictability an endless stream of topical jokes and sentences that resemble jokes, <a href="https://twitter.com/BorowitzReport">for Twitter</a> ("Romney: 'It's time to transform America, and Paul Ryan and I are both Transformers.'" I think the joke there is that Romney and Ryan are robotic. Or maybe that they're evil?) and his new home at the New Yorker.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/andy_borowitz_not_funny/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/andy_borowitz_not_funny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Rubin, Mitt Romney&#8217;s top media shill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/jennifer_rubin_mitt_romneys_top_media_shill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/jennifer_rubin_mitt_romneys_top_media_shill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12970397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Romney campaign's communications office has its own platform at the Washington Post, thanks to Jennifer Rubin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading Jennifer Rubin in 2012 makes me almost nostalgic for the days when Jennifer Rubin's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/jennifer_rubins_boss_sees_no_problem_with_anti_arab_bigotry/">writing was almost solely devoted to bloodthirsty vitriol against Arabs and any Americans who dared say a kind thing about Palestinians</a>. Because the new Jennifer Rubin is something even lower than a reactionary columnist: Now she's just a shill. A boring shill.</p><p>In Jennifer Rubin, the Washington Post currently employs a semi-official Mitt Romney spokesperson. There's not another prominent media figure who is more shameless about acting solely in the best interests of a presidential campaign. Bill Kristol is at this point a more intellectually honest commentator than Rubin has become.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/jennifer_rubin_mitt_romneys_top_media_shill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/02/jennifer_rubin_mitt_romneys_top_media_shill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aaron Sorkin versus reality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/aaron_sorkin_versus_frivolity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/aaron_sorkin_versus_frivolity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Sorkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Newsroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12960068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The increasingly unpleasant superiority complex of America's most prominent liberal screenwriter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Sorkin is why people hate liberals. He's a smug, condescending know-it-all who isn't as smart as he thinks he is. His feints toward open-mindedness are transparently phony, he mistakes his opinion for common sense, and he's preachy. Sorkin has spent years fueling the delusional self-regard of well-educated liberals. He might be more responsible than anyone else for the anti-democratic "everyone would agree with us if they weren't all so stupid" attitude of the contemporary progressive movement. And age is not improving him.</p><p>Sorkin is ... not as popular as he once was, when he was still just the creative mind behind the much-loved "Sports Night" and "The West Wing." People are, broadly, sick of his shtick. But he's also, undoubtedly, more professionally successful than ever, back in demand as a major film screenwriter (coming off an Oscar win followed by a nomination) and heading one of HBO's trademark "prestige" dramas. He <a href="http://www.grantland.com/blog/hollywood-prospectus/post/_/id/53226/embattled-news-fixer-aaron-sorkin-defends-his-show-on-npr-i-write-corny-you-know">seems nonplussed</a> by the negative responses to his new show, "The Newsroom," and he has plenty of reason to be: To his mind, he's the same hack he's always been.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/aaron_sorkin_versus_frivolity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/aaron_sorkin_versus_frivolity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>287</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kathryn Jean Lopez: The saddest hack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/21/k_lo_the_saddest_hack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/21/k_lo_the_saddest_hack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Jean Lopez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12942212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's time to take the National Review's Kathryn Jean Lopez seriously, as depressing as that is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn Jean Lopez is, as best I can tell, a Heritage Foundation intern who was awarded the job of "National Review Online Editor" because no one at the magazine cared about the Web and she was the only person willing to update the site on the weekends. She was certainly not given the title due to her experience or, god help us, her talent.</p><p>I think this is maybe the ultimate Kathryn Jean Lopez Corner post. It's by no means the most stupid or wrong-headed or insane, <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040708031338/http://www.nationalreview.com/thecorner/04_07_04_corner-archive.asp#035079">just the one that best captures everything that makes her so depressing to contemplate:</a></p><blockquote><p><strong>SIGH</strong> [KJL ]<br /> A very minor thing, but a trend: I heard a replay of Clay Aiken singing that Lee Greenwood song “God Bless the U.S.A.” at the Mall last night. The American Idol changed “I won’t forget the men who died” to “I won’t forget the ones who died.” Yes, women die in war, too. And not just in Iraq or Afghanistan. We know that. Do we really need Clay Aiken to spell it out? Would people really, seriously be offended if he sang “men”?<br /> Posted at 12:23 PM</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/21/k_lo_the_saddest_hack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/21/k_lo_the_saddest_hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luke Russert, nepotist prince</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/luke_russert_nepotist_prince/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/luke_russert_nepotist_prince/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Russert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luke Russert is being groomed as a simulacrum of his father -- but without the inspiring rags-to-riches story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Russert was not the unalloyed saint of tough journalism that his celebrators describe in posthumous tributes, but he was at least a classic American success story, of the sort that we still enjoy pretending is common: Blue-collar kid from Rust Belt town becomes enormously successful thanks largely to brains and hard work. The story of Luke Russert, alas, is a much more common one in American life: No-account kid of successful person has more success thrust upon him.</p><p>Pretty much immediately upon the death of his father, Luke Russert inexplicably had a full-time broadcasting job, supplanting his part-time broadcasting job co-hosting a satellite radio sports talk show with James Carville. (That was a real thing that actually existed. Can you imagine a human who would want to listen to that?)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/luke_russert_nepotist_prince/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/luke_russert_nepotist_prince/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jonah Goldberg&#8217;s desperation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/jonah_goldbergs_desperation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/jonah_goldbergs_desperation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Review hack is a unique figure: Striving for seriousness, but too lazy to achieve it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonah Goldberg is a syndicated columnist, author of books and National Review Online editor because his mother nearly took down Bill Clinton. He is, it's fair to say, aware of that fact, or at least aware that everyone else thinks it, and his insecurity has made him a uniquely pathetic figure in contemporary conservative thought: He aspires to be taken seriously as a public intellectual, but he is the world's laziest thinker. It is a grand and wonderful joke that Jonah Goldberg, of all people, would write an entire book about how liberals rely on clichés instead of original thought and intellectual argument.</p><p>On the back of my review copy of "The Tyranny of Clichés," Goldberg's latest, it still claims that the author "has twice been nominated for the Pulitzer Prize." That, of course, was revealed yesterday to be <a href="http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/09/11608553-conservative-author-jonah-goldberg-drops-claim-of-two-pulitzer-nominations">utter bullshit.</a> He is a two-time <em>entrant</em> for Pulitzer consideration -- to enter requires solely an application and a $50 fee -- and while Goldberg claims not to have added that line to his bio, it appears everywhere he writes, and it's hard to believe he hadn't noticed it until this week. That said, I can't imagine a person dumb enough to actually believe that Jonah Goldberg had been seriously considered for a Pulitzer. (Well, OK, I can imagine <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/157254/big-time/kathryn-jean-lopez#">one person dumb enough.</a>)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/jonah_goldbergs_desperation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/jonah_goldbergs_desperation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>