<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The Innocence Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_innocence_project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why police lineups can&#8217;t be trusted</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/why_criminal_lineups_cant_be_trusted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/why_criminal_lineups_cant_be_trusted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Innocence Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The single biggest cause of wrongful convictions is mistaken eyewitness identification. Is there a better way?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Studies have shown that memory and recall are more fallible than failsafe. That finding undermines eyewitness identifications—a critical prosecution mainstay—revealing them as far more fragile evidence than imagined. Just ask Rickey Dale Wyatt of Dallas, Texas. On January 4, 2012, he was released from prison after serving 31 years of a 99-year sentence for a rape he did not commit.</p><p>Police were sure that a single rapist had committed a cluster of rapes when they arrested Wyatt for three assaults.</p><p>The third victim, who had been grabbed from behind and dragged at knifepoint to a dimly lit area, was the first to identify Wyatt. Ultimately, all three picked Wyatt from photographic lineups. All had described their rapists as being between 170 and 200 pounds, between 5’9” and 6’, and as having no facial hair. Wyatt is 5’6”, was close to 140 pounds—and he had abundant facial hair and a mustache.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/why_criminal_lineups_cant_be_trusted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/why_criminal_lineups_cant_be_trusted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
