<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The Labor Movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_labor_movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>McDonald&#8217;s pay chasm: $8.25/hour to $8.75 million/year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CEO makes almost 600 times as much as one Chicago worker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg has an <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-12/mcdonald-s-8-25-man-and-8-75-million-ceo-shows-pay-gap.html">article</a> today highlighting the pay gap at McDonald's. The whole piece is worth a read but the beginning is particularly striking. It highlights Chicago man Tyree Johnson, who holds positions at two different McDonald's. Between shifts he has to give himself a quick scrubbing in one of the restaurant's bathrooms because he can't even show up for work at a McDonald's smelling like a McDonald's.</p><blockquote><p>“I hate when my boss tells me she won’t give me a raise because she can smell me,” he said.</p> <p>Johnson, 44, needs the two paychecks to pay rent for his apartment at a single-room occupancy hotel on the city’s north side. While he’s worked at McDonald’s stores for two decades, he still doesn’t get 40 hours a week and makes $8.25 an hour, minimum wage in Illinois.</p> <p>This is life in one of America’s premier growth industries. Fast-food restaurants have added positions more than twice as fast as the U.S. average during the recovery that began in June 2009.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1,000 Walmart protests across the US</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An update on nationwide strikes and solidarity demonstrations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Walmart press release this morning downplayed what commentators have called<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/"> historic strike actions</a> by Walmart workers this Black Friday across the United States.</p><p>The release noted that "the same number of associates missed their scheduled shift as last year," but hundreds of protests in 46 states beginning Thursday evening have drawn attention to the retailer's poor labor practices while according to The Nation, workers struck at stores in Dallas, Kenosha, Wis., San Leandro, Calif., and Clovis, N.M. At least one worker went out on strike at stores in Ocean City, Md., Orlando and Baton Rouge. <a href="http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Alan-Grayson-helps-Walmart-worker-walk-off-job-in-Black-Friday-protest/-/1637132/17528464/-/3xykrk/-/index.html">Rep.-elect Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) joined</a> a Walmart worker as she walked off her job in St. Cloud.</p><p>Walmart stores rang up almost 10 million transactions from the time doors opened for Black Friday shoppers at 8 p.m. Thursday until midnight. Meanwhile the following strikes and protest actions have been reported:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picket line blocks Port of Oakland activity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of America's busiest ports was disrupted Tuesday by striking custodial and maintenance workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Custodial and maintenance workers picketed Tuesday at one of the nation's busiest ports, blocking trucks from picking up and delivering goods on what had been expected to be a busy day before the holidays.</p><p>Ships waited at six of the seven terminals at the Port of Oakland, as intermittent rain soaked hundreds of angry workers who carried signs and blocked entrances during the one-day protest over stalled contract talks.</p><p>Passing motorists blared horns and supporters pounded drums as strikers chanted, "Shut it down, we're a union town!"</p><p>"We're letting management and the public know that they can't treat us like that," said Lynn Riordan, a communications staffer for Service Employees International Union Local 1021.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart&#8217;s Black Friday showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUR walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Labor Relations Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything you need to know about the historic strikes and the attempts to shut them down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employees at 1,000 Walmart stores across the country are planning to strike on Black Friday. The holiday period industrial action comes in the wake of a string of strikes by Walmart workers in several states and involving employees throughout the retailer's supply chain. As<a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/171222/alleging-new-wave-retaliation-walmart-warehouse-workers-will-strike-day-early#"> Josh Eidelson noted </a>at the Nation, "seafood workers [went on strike] in June, [followed] by warehouse workers in September, and by 160 retail workers in twelve states last month."</p><p>"Black Friday," wrote Eidelson, "workers have pledged -- barring concessions from the company -- will bring their biggest disruptions yet." Walmart employees across the country have a host of grievances including unsafe and unsanitary working conditions, sexual harassment, excessive hours, <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/14/walmart-unable-to-substantiate-forced-labor-claims-at-seafood-supplier.html">forced labor</a> and low pay. <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/19/leaked-document-reveals-walmarts-meager-compensation-structure/">Ned Resnikoff at MSNBC flagged</a> a leaked internal document (first obtained by HuffPo) that revealed that base pay  at Walmart's Sam's Place stores can be as low as $8 an hour (or $16,000 per year), with wage increases in increments as low as 20 or 40 cents per hour. To put this in context, <a href="http://gawker.com/5962195/where-to-find-your-wal+mart-black-friday-protests">Gawker</a> recently highlighted <a href="http://www.demos.org/publication/retails-hidden-potential-how-raising-wages-would-benefit-workers-industry-and-overall-ec">a Demos study</a> that says that raising the salary of all full-time workers at large retailers to $25,000 per year would lift more than 700,000 people out of poverty, at a cost of only a 1 percent price increase for customers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vulture capitalism &#8212; not unions &#8212; killed Twinkies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twinkies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hedge funds took profits and piled on millions in debt at Hostess. They created this bankruptcy, not unions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the final Twinkies, Sno-Balls and those glowing orange cupcakes were stuffed with cream and wrapped in cellophane on Friday, the business world and much of the news media knew who was to blame for this dying American icon. It was the unions.</p><p>The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323622904578127281230173980.html">described</a> the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union as “The union that brought the 85-year-old baker of Twinkies and Wonder Bread to its knees.” Over at RedState, a headline tried to mix anti-union sentiment with conservative humor: “The Demise of Twinkies? Yes, It’s True. Parasitic Unions Kill Their Hosts (or, in this case, Hostess).”</p><p>As Hostess moved to end its operations last week -- a bankruptcy judge <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Hostess-Judge-Would-Like-Mediation-Sessions-to-4051110.php">asked</a> the company Monday to try mediation with its unions; those talks are scheduled to begin today -- commentators were eager to blame the rigidity of unions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the election means for the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13057016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American left needs to change a lot of minds on the way to a more decent society. A president can help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When our quadrennial circus finally folds its tents next week (barring another agonizing long count as in 2000), what will the result mean for the fortunes of that contentious, somewhat indistinct creature we call the American left?</p><p>The answer obviously depends, in part, on whether Mitt Romney or Barack Obama wins the race.  When we elect a president, we are also, in effect, appointing or reappointing thousands of committed progressives or equally avid conservatives to federal jobs where they try hard to carry out policies they support or to block ones they despise. Romney may be a cagy moderate at heart, and Obama may yearn to live up to the bipartisan rhetoric of his 2008 campaign. But most of the people who have the necessary skills and experience to work for a president are determined to move the nation to either the right or the left.</p><p>At the same time, what will happen after Inauguration Day raises the question of which parts of the left one is talking about. Four of its largest sections -- the LGBT community,  promoters of immigrant rights, environmentalists and organized labor – usually come together at election time, but they do not have similar prospects for growth or success.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart workers on strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employees protesting working conditions and retaliation are flexing their organizing muscle. But the first-of-its-kind strike carries risks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, for the first time in Wal-Mart’s 50-year history, workers at multiple<strong> </strong>stores are out on strike. Minutes ago, dozens of workers at Southern California stores launched a one-day work stoppage in protest of alleged retaliation against their attempts to organize. In a few hours, they’ll join supporters for a mass rally outside a Pico Rivera, Calif., store. This is the latest – and most dramatic – of the recent escalations in the decades-long struggle between organized labor and the largest private employer in the world.</p><p>“I’m excited, I’m nervous, I’m scared…” Pico Rivera Wal-Mart employee Evelin Cruz told Salon yesterday about her decision to join today’s strike. “But I think the time has come, so they take notice that these associates are tired of all the issues in the stores, all the management retaliating against you.” Rivera, a department manager, said her store is chronically understaffed: “They expect the work to be done, without having the people to do the job.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart warehouse strike heats up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warehouse Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The giant retailer had to shut down a distribution facility]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, 600-plus people marched to Wal-Mart's vast distribution warehouse in Elwood, Ill., to show support for 30 non-union workers who have been on strike since mid-September. Riot police were called in and arrested 17 people as a group of marchers sat down to block the road to the warehouse. However, in successfully shutting down the facility for the day, strikers and their supporters estimate their protest Monday cost the company several million dollars.</p><p>The civil disobedience also brought attention to the strike, which has continued for weeks with no media fanfare. Workers cite unsafe conditions and low wages as fueling their industrial action, along with complaints about long shifts with no breaks and sexual harassment. Micah Uetricht <a href="http://labornotes.org/2012/10/strike-supporters-shut-down-illinois-walmart-warehouse" target="_blank">reported for</a> Labor Notes on Monday's march, the strike and the reasons underpinning it:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the lockout: another sign of labor&#8217;s slide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13023933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFL refs are back to work, but lots more American workers remain locked out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, three days after a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/how_ayn_rand_is_wrecking_football/singleton" target="_blank">blown call</a> that had even Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker pleading to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/dumb_tweet_when_scott_walker_supports_unions/singleton" target="_blank">“#Returntherealrefs</a>,” football’s union referees were back on the field. Just before midnight, management announced a deal had been reached on a new contract, ending a lockout marked by questionable calls and -- worse -- <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2012/09/25/909171/why-the-blown-call-on-monday-night-football-really-matters/" target="_blank">unsafe but unpunished</a> hits. As the “replacement” refs depart the field, talk of lockouts will fade from the news -- but they'll remain a growing trend in labor struggles across the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Won&#8217;t Back Down&#8221;: Why do teachers&#8217; unions hate America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gyllenhaal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Won't Back Down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viola Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Won't Back Down" is an offensive, lame, union-bashing drama, which somehow stars Viola Davis and Maggie Gyllenhaal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So teachers’ unions don’t care about kids. Oh, and luck is a foxy lady. This is what I took away from the inept and bizarre <a href="http://www.wbdtoolkit.com/">“Won’t Back Down,”</a> a set of right-wing anti-union talking points disguised (with very limited success) as a mainstream motion-picture-type product. Someone needs to launch an investigation into what combination of crimes, dares, alcoholic binges and lapses in judgment got Viola Davis and Maggie Gyllenhaal into this movie. Neither of them seems likely to sympathize with its thinly veiled labor-bashing agenda and, way more to the point, I thought they had better taste. Maybe it was that actor-y thing where they saw potential in their characters – a feisty, working-class single mom for Gyllenhaal, a sober middle-class schoolteacher for Davis – liked the idea of working together and didn’t think too much about the big picture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s rampant farm-labor abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farmworker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13009019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new case exposes a thorny legal question: Who's responsible for sub-contracted labor exploitation?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/Prospect-Logo.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a></p><p>One morning earlier this year, in the borderland town of Brawley, California, 75-year-old Ignacio Villalobos perched on a chair in his trailer, removed a plastic bag from the well of a rubber boot, and finished dressing for work. Dawn was still an hour away, and in the wan light of the kitchen, Villalobos took off his house sandals and pulled the bag over his right foot. He bunched it at the ankle, then slipped his foot into his boot.</p><p>“These shoes aren’t made for water,” he said, adding that morning dew and irrigation keep farm fields damp—even in the desert of the Imperial Valley where he was working. Villalobos estimated that a pair of decent used boots would run him $30, almost half a day’s wages; the bags were free.</p><p>Villalobos moved quietly, trying to keep from waking his grown nephew, Roberto, who was sleeping in the back bedroom of the trailer. For years, Villalobos and his partner, Juana, had raised Roberto, whom they had taken in as an infant. Then, last year, Juana died after battling diabetes and heart disease, leaving the two men on their own. Villalobos tied his boot before repeating the process with his left foot and grabbed a bag of bologna sandwiches he had made that morning. By 6:15 A.M., he was out the door.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;They want to run us to death&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12991417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats will announce a pro-union platform in Charlotte -- but some convention workers say they're forgotten ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two weeks, Democrats will gather in Charlotte, N.C., and pledge once more to strengthen the right of workers to join unions and negotiate with their bosses. But the convention's success depends on the work of the city's sanitation workers, who are banned by law from exercising that right. As the party readies its platform pronouncements, those workers are asking for more concrete help.</p><p>Wednesday, leaders of a North Carolina union released a letter appealing to President Obama and the Democratic National Committee for support in their efforts to win union rights. “Despite the added work and dangers for Charlotte City workers in preparation for and in the aftermath of the DNC, and the fact that $50 million in federal funding has been allotted to the City of Charlotte to host the DNC,” the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) Local 150 wrote, “the City of Charlotte refuses to address the needs and rights of the City workers.”</p><p>“The workers are working like dogs,” said garbage driver Al Locklear, the president of Local 150’s Charlotte chapter. “They want to run us to death.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart punishes its workers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12964746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employees who demonstrated against the company tell Salon they've lost their jobs and faced other consequences]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Wal-Mart celebrates its 50th anniversary this summer, it has faced a new wave of resistance from its “associates” -- the company’s corporate-speak for employees. Last month, a delegation of Wal-Mart workers brought their grievances to the company’s shareholder meeting, including low wages and understaffing. In interviews yesterday, three workers at the forefront of the campaign told Salon the company has punished them for their activism. Critics say that the world’s largest private sector employer is playing dirty once again.</p><p>Last June, nearly 100 Wal-Mart employees announced the formation of a new membership organization called OUR Walmart, which demanded improvements on the job. Though backed by the United Food and Commercial Workers union, it hasn’t sought union recognition (UFCW also <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/03/national/03walmart.html">backed</a> a previous non-union organization of Wal-Mart workers in 2005). OUR Walmart currently claims thousands of Wal-Mart workers in hundreds of stores as dues-paying members. As its efforts have escalated, OUR Walmart leaders say Wal-Mart has targeted them for punishment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Parent trigger&#8221;: The latest tactic for fighting teachers&#8217; unions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12946378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal politicians are lining up behind "parent trigger" -- the latest attack on educators' bargaining rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wisconsin recall is now weeks past, but collective bargaining is still under assault nationwide. In cities and states across the country, public school teachers face threats not just to their benefits, but to their right to negotiate. And liberal Democrats are as likely as Scott Walker-style Republicans to be the ones mounting the attack.</p><p>Earlier this month, the U.S. Conference of Mayors held its annual meeting in Florida. It’s a diverse group, including leaders from both parties and all parts of the country. But it pulled off a unanimous endorsement of a pivotal piece of legislation: the anti-union education reform template proponents call “parent trigger.”</p><p>Parent trigger is the latest flashpoint in the wars over “education reform” (a term now claimed by right-wing front groups, defensive teachers' unions and activists of many stripes). It exemplifies the near-consensus of the media and financial elite: That teachers’ interests are opposed to those of kids and parents; that smoking out bad teachers trumps <a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2012/03/when_teachers_leave_schools_ov.html">improving teacher retention</a>; and that what’s needed in a crisis is to concentrate power. It also shows, anti-Walker rhetoric notwithstanding, that workers’ right to bargain is no Democratic Party sacrament.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trans-Pacific Partnership: Larger than NAFTA?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12937895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaked documents reveal disturbing truths about a trade deal Obama's negotiating that could grow bigger than NAFTA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama campaigned in 2008 as a strong pro-labor candidate, and this year he will again. But for union activists who'll be working hard for his reelection, a newly leaked document represents yet another bitter disappointment.</p><p>The document contains draft text of a chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement currently being negotiated between the U.S. and eight Pacific countries. The Obama administration has shrouded the negotiation in secrecy, but the document, <a href="http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/tppinvestment.pdf" target="_blank">published by a coalition including the consumer group Public Citizen</a>, sheds a light on the process -- and the view isn’t pretty.</p><p>“The leaked document,” says Todd Tucker, the research director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division, “shows that in all of the major respects, this is exactly the same template that was used in NAFTA and other agreements that President Obama campaigned against.” Public Citizen warns that the provisions of the agreement would allow other countries to join in the future, giving it the potential to become a new global trade agreement, larger than NAFTA.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can unions fight Super PACs?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12928905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AFL-CIO says labor will reshape its political operation. Not all union leaders think it goes far enough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one was surprised this winter when the AFL-CIO and its major unions endorsed President Obama’s reelection. Despite decades of enrollment decline, the AFL-CIO remains the largest membership organization in progressive politics, and it is a much relied-upon ally in Democratic election campaigns. But faced with a post-Citizens United landscape and armed with hard-fought lessons, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka is pledging a “big change” in how the federation does politics.</p><p>“Before, we used to build everybody else’s structure,” says Trumka, “and now, we’re going to build our own structure.”  He says to expect three changes: more focus on door-to-door organizing rather than TV ads; more funds toward building a permanent, independent political infrastructure and less towards candidates’ coffers; and more outreach beyond union households.</p><p>What could this look like for Obama’s reelection effort in Ohio or Elizabeth Warren’s Senate campaign in Massachusetts? Less direct campaign cash from unions and fewer union-backed TV ads on their behalf. More union volunteers, acting apart from the Democratic campaign, persuading and mobilizing people to vote for the candidates. And an organization pledged to better hold the candidates accountable if they win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New video could damage Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/new_video_could_damage_walker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/new_video_could_damage_walker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exclusive: One of the Wisconsin governor's closest allies says the GOP wanted to "go further" on union-busting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Scott Walker want to make Wisconsin a right-to-work state? He says no. But his allies are gunning for it.</p><p>In a new video, the speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly says his caucus wanted to pass a right-to-work bill last year. The video, shot on March 27 of this year by a Democratic Party tracker, who provided the footage to Salon, captures Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald talking at a bar with a reporter from the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.</p><p>The reporter asks Fitzgerald whether he was surprised when Walker described his plans to attack public workers’ collective bargaining. “No, it wasn’t a shock to me …” responds Fitzgerald. “My caucus wanted to go further. I had people in my caucus that was, you know, were wondering if we were going to do Right to Work in this state. So to tell you the truth, the collective bargaining, to me, I thought was more of a middle ground if you can believe that.”</p><p>Fitzgerald says “a number of people thought” they would push right-to-work, just as Republicans were in Indiana (where it passed this winter) and Minnesota (where it stalled). “When I heard about the collective bargaining,” he says, “it didn’t surprise me at all.” (Fitzgerald did not immediately respond to a request for comment.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/new_video_could_damage_walker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/new_video_could_damage_walker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;m not Scott Walker&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/im_not_scott_walker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/im_not_scott_walker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12919101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State Republicans are terrified of pushing anti-union legislation -- and becoming targets like Wisconsin's governor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labor has taken a beating. While private companies squeeze and lock out workers, resurgent right-wingers have pushed anti-union bills in statehouses around the country. But after a seemingly relentless national assault provoked dramatic pushback in Wisconsin and elsewhere, some Republicans are … relenting.</p><p>Take Minnesota. 2010’s red wave flipped both the state House and Senate, putting Republicans in unified control of the Legislature for the first time in 38 years. In January 2011, just after they took office and just before an uprising erupted in neighboring Wisconsin, Minnesota Republicans introduced <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/how_to_fight_indianas_right_to_work_law/singleton">Right to Work</a> – a bill to defund unions by banning contracts that require workers represented by them to pay for representation. To get around newly elected Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton, Republicans proposed Right to Work as a constitutional amendment, requiring approval from the voters, but not the governor.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/im_not_scott_walker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/im_not_scott_walker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May Day&#8217;s radical history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/may_days_radical_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/may_days_radical_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The date of Occupy's strike has ties to the eight-hour day movement, immigrant workers and American anarchism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American general strikes—or rather, American calls for general strikes, like the one Occupy Los Angeles issued last December that has been endorsed by over 150 general assemblies—are tinged with nostalgia.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>The last real general strike in this country, which is to say, the last general strike that shut down a city, was in Oakland, Calif. in 1946—though journalist John Nichols has suggested that what we saw in Madison, Wisconsin last year was a sort of general strike. When we call a general strike, or talk of one, we refer not to a current mode of organizing; we refer back, implicitly or explicitly, to some of the most militant moments in American working-class history. People posting on the Occupy strike blog <a href="http://howistrike.tumblr.com/">How I Strike</a> have suggested that next week’s May Day is highly symbolic. As we think about and develop new ways of “general striking,” we also reconnect with a past we've mostly forgotten.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/may_days_radical_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/may_days_radical_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimum-wage misconceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12910538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrary to right-wing propaganda, decent pay for workers helps the economy and boosts job creation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, has introduced a bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $9.80 from its present level of $7.25. Polls are showing many voters<a href="http://stamford.patch.com/articles/poll-voters-support-death-penalty-raising-minimum-wage-9f40b48b"> in favor,</a> though they are confused about what it would mean for the job market. The truth is that a move would be good for a slow economy and have a positive impact on the job crisis. Naturally, this has led to the usual cries of opposition, largely based on the notion that raising the minimum wage hurts the very people it is supposed to help. Typical of this view is a letter to the New York Times from Michael Saltsman, a fellow at the Employment Policies Institute, a business-backed nonprofit research group (surprise!).</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Saltsman <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/21/opinion/what-are-the-effects-of-raising-the-minimum-wage.html?_r=1">trots out the old canards</a> against the minimum wage, claiming that research indicates that a minimum wage increase "simply doesn’t help the poor — in fact, it hurts them." He cites studies which showed that states with their minimum wages between 2003 and 2007 found no associated decline in state poverty rates. Saltsman gives three reasons for this:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>