<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The Labor Movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_labor_movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fast food strikes spread to Detroit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/fast_food_strikes_spread_to_detroit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/fast_food_strikes_spread_to_detroit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The motor city is the fourth in five weeks to see workers walk off the job in hope of inspiring others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week Josh Eidelson <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/">reported for Salon</a> that St. Louis was hit with a surprise fast food worker strike, when non-union workers from restaurants including MacDonald's and Wendy's walked off the job Wednesday. <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/174270/fast-food-strike-wave-spreads-detroit">He now reports</a> that Detroit has become the fourth city in five weeks to see such a strike. Organizers expect over 100 workers from at least 60 stores, including McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Subway, Little Caesar’s, and Popeye’s to walk out at 6 a.m.. Eidelson, who has closely followed the wave of strikes since they began in New York, noted their significance despite their small size in a post <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/174270/fast-food-strike-wave-spreads-detroit">for the Nation</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/fast_food_strikes_spread_to_detroit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/fast_food_strikes_spread_to_detroit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise fast food strike planned in St. Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: Walkout to include workers from McDonald’s and Wendy’s. Follows similar actions in New York and Chicago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the third time in five weeks, non-union fast food workers in a major American city are headed out on strike. Starting at 5 p.m. Central Time today, dozens of employees plan to walk off the job in St. Louis,  following similar strikes in Chicago April 24, and in New York City on Nov. 29 and April 4. Like their counterparts in New York and Chicago, the St. Louis workers are demanding a $15 an hour wage, and the chance to form a union without intimidation.</p><p>“I just feel that if we don’t stand up now, it’s never going to happen,” said Tomecka Wilson, a 32-year-old who works for the seafood chain Captain D’s. “They’re making billions off of us making little to nothing. So they can afford to share a little bit more.”</p><p>Organizers expect 50 to 70 St. Louis workers to strike over the next 24 hours, including workers from McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Hardee’s and Domino’s. The strike got an early start this morning, when a group of workers at a Jimmy John’s went out on strike in protest over alleged humiliation by management: They say their boss required them to wear signs stating that they worked too slowly. “It’s clearly getting national traction,” said Ed Ott, a lecturer in labor studies for the City University of New York, consultant for unions, and board member of New York Communities for Change, the group spearheading fast food organizing in the nation’s largest city. “This is potentially the largest organizing drive in decades.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast food workers plan surprise strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: Workers in some 70 restaurants expected to walk off job, potentially shutting down several eateries today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated, 12:11 p.m.</strong>: The Fast Food Forward campaign says hundreds of workers are now out on strike, and that they are on track to have 400 strikers, from about 70 stores, by the end of the day. At least one store was unable to open for lack of employees this morning. Local politicians, including at least three mayoral candidates - City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, Comptroller John Liu, and Public Advocate Bill de Blasio - are expected to rally with the fast food workers. Striking workers are currently converging at a Wendy's in Midtown Manhattan, a Wendy's in Brooklyn, and a Burger King in Harlem. At 5:30 PM, strikers and supporters will gather in Harlem's Marcus Garvey Park and march to a McDonald's store for the day's largest event.</p><p>Asked for comment on the strike, spokespeople for McDonald's and the National Restaurant Association referred Salon to their statements from yesterday. In an e-mailed statement, de Blasio said, "Fast Food Forward is fighting for solutions for working people right here and now, and it deserves the support of all New Yorkers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Senate plan: Legalize serfdom?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_senate_plan_legalize_serfdom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_senate_plan_legalize_serfdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New immigration proposal will create a legal class of non-citizen serfs forced to work without basic benefits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Senators Agree on Legalized Serfdom.” That should have been the headline. Instead, the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-immigration-hurdles-20130311,0,4603683.story">Los Angeles Times</a> reads: “Senators agree on path to legal status for illegal immigrants.”</p><p>When it comes to proposals for granting legal status to most of the more than 10 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., the devil is in the details — and the details of this reported deal are particularly satanic:</p><blockquote><p>Still undecided is how long illegal immigrants would need to wait before they could apply for permanent resident status and eventually become citizens. The delay for a green card probably would be 10 years or longer, the aides said.</p></blockquote><p>Let’s do the math. A green card permits a foreign national to live and work in the U.S., while applying for U.S. citizenship. Once a foreign worker gets a green card, it takes a minimum of five years to become a U.S. citizen.</p><p>So if the report is accurate, then the real proposal is that it will take at least 15 years before today’s illegal immigrants can become citizens — 10 years in legalized limbo status, waiting to get a green card, and then five more years as a green card holder, before being eligible to become a citizen. And that’s a minimum.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_senate_plan_legalize_serfdom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_senate_plan_legalize_serfdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McDonald&#8217;s pay chasm: $8.25/hour to $8.75 million/year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CEO makes almost 600 times as much as one Chicago worker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg has an <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-12/mcdonald-s-8-25-man-and-8-75-million-ceo-shows-pay-gap.html">article</a> today highlighting the pay gap at McDonald's. The whole piece is worth a read but the beginning is particularly striking. It highlights Chicago man Tyree Johnson, who holds positions at two different McDonald's. Between shifts he has to give himself a quick scrubbing in one of the restaurant's bathrooms because he can't even show up for work at a McDonald's smelling like a McDonald's.</p><blockquote><p>“I hate when my boss tells me she won’t give me a raise because she can smell me,” he said.</p> <p>Johnson, 44, needs the two paychecks to pay rent for his apartment at a single-room occupancy hotel on the city’s north side. While he’s worked at McDonald’s stores for two decades, he still doesn’t get 40 hours a week and makes $8.25 an hour, minimum wage in Illinois.</p> <p>This is life in one of America’s premier growth industries. Fast-food restaurants have added positions more than twice as fast as the U.S. average during the recovery that began in June 2009.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/mcdonalds_pay_chasm_8_25hour_to_8_75_millionyear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1,000 Walmart protests across the US</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An update on nationwide strikes and solidarity demonstrations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Walmart press release this morning downplayed what commentators have called<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/"> historic strike actions</a> by Walmart workers this Black Friday across the United States.</p><p>The release noted that "the same number of associates missed their scheduled shift as last year," but hundreds of protests in 46 states beginning Thursday evening have drawn attention to the retailer's poor labor practices while according to The Nation, workers struck at stores in Dallas, Kenosha, Wis., San Leandro, Calif., and Clovis, N.M. At least one worker went out on strike at stores in Ocean City, Md., Orlando and Baton Rouge. <a href="http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Alan-Grayson-helps-Walmart-worker-walk-off-job-in-Black-Friday-protest/-/1637132/17528464/-/3xykrk/-/index.html">Rep.-elect Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) joined</a> a Walmart worker as she walked off her job in St. Cloud.</p><p>Walmart stores rang up almost 10 million transactions from the time doors opened for Black Friday shoppers at 8 p.m. Thursday until midnight. Meanwhile the following strikes and protest actions have been reported:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/1000_walmart_protests_across_the_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picket line blocks Port of Oakland activity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of America's busiest ports was disrupted Tuesday by striking custodial and maintenance workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Custodial and maintenance workers picketed Tuesday at one of the nation's busiest ports, blocking trucks from picking up and delivering goods on what had been expected to be a busy day before the holidays.</p><p>Ships waited at six of the seven terminals at the Port of Oakland, as intermittent rain soaked hundreds of angry workers who carried signs and blocked entrances during the one-day protest over stalled contract talks.</p><p>Passing motorists blared horns and supporters pounded drums as strikers chanted, "Shut it down, we're a union town!"</p><p>"We're letting management and the public know that they can't treat us like that," said Lynn Riordan, a communications staffer for Service Employees International Union Local 1021.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/picket_line_blocks_port_of_oakland_activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart&#8217;s Black Friday showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUR walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Labor Relations Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything you need to know about the historic strikes and the attempts to shut them down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employees at 1,000 Walmart stores across the country are planning to strike on Black Friday. The holiday period industrial action comes in the wake of a string of strikes by Walmart workers in several states and involving employees throughout the retailer's supply chain. As<a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/171222/alleging-new-wave-retaliation-walmart-warehouse-workers-will-strike-day-early#"> Josh Eidelson noted </a>at the Nation, "seafood workers [went on strike] in June, [followed] by warehouse workers in September, and by 160 retail workers in twelve states last month."</p><p>"Black Friday," wrote Eidelson, "workers have pledged -- barring concessions from the company -- will bring their biggest disruptions yet." Walmart employees across the country have a host of grievances including unsafe and unsanitary working conditions, sexual harassment, excessive hours, <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/14/walmart-unable-to-substantiate-forced-labor-claims-at-seafood-supplier.html">forced labor</a> and low pay. <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/19/leaked-document-reveals-walmarts-meager-compensation-structure/">Ned Resnikoff at MSNBC flagged</a> a leaked internal document (first obtained by HuffPo) that revealed that base pay  at Walmart's Sam's Place stores can be as low as $8 an hour (or $16,000 per year), with wage increases in increments as low as 20 or 40 cents per hour. To put this in context, <a href="http://gawker.com/5962195/where-to-find-your-wal+mart-black-friday-protests">Gawker</a> recently highlighted <a href="http://www.demos.org/publication/retails-hidden-potential-how-raising-wages-would-benefit-workers-industry-and-overall-ec">a Demos study</a> that says that raising the salary of all full-time workers at large retailers to $25,000 per year would lift more than 700,000 people out of poverty, at a cost of only a 1 percent price increase for customers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vulture capitalism &#8212; not unions &#8212; killed Twinkies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twinkies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hedge funds took profits and piled on millions in debt at Hostess. They created this bankruptcy, not unions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the final Twinkies, Sno-Balls and those glowing orange cupcakes were stuffed with cream and wrapped in cellophane on Friday, the business world and much of the news media knew who was to blame for this dying American icon. It was the unions.</p><p>The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323622904578127281230173980.html">described</a> the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union as “The union that brought the 85-year-old baker of Twinkies and Wonder Bread to its knees.” Over at RedState, a headline tried to mix anti-union sentiment with conservative humor: “The Demise of Twinkies? Yes, It’s True. Parasitic Unions Kill Their Hosts (or, in this case, Hostess).”</p><p>As Hostess moved to end its operations last week -- a bankruptcy judge <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Hostess-Judge-Would-Like-Mediation-Sessions-to-4051110.php">asked</a> the company Monday to try mediation with its unions; those talks are scheduled to begin today -- commentators were eager to blame the rigidity of unions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/vulture_capitalism_not_unions_killed_twinkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the election means for the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13057016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American left needs to change a lot of minds on the way to a more decent society. A president can help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When our quadrennial circus finally folds its tents next week (barring another agonizing long count as in 2000), what will the result mean for the fortunes of that contentious, somewhat indistinct creature we call the American left?</p><p>The answer obviously depends, in part, on whether Mitt Romney or Barack Obama wins the race.  When we elect a president, we are also, in effect, appointing or reappointing thousands of committed progressives or equally avid conservatives to federal jobs where they try hard to carry out policies they support or to block ones they despise. Romney may be a cagy moderate at heart, and Obama may yearn to live up to the bipartisan rhetoric of his 2008 campaign. But most of the people who have the necessary skills and experience to work for a president are determined to move the nation to either the right or the left.</p><p>At the same time, what will happen after Inauguration Day raises the question of which parts of the left one is talking about. Four of its largest sections -- the LGBT community,  promoters of immigrant rights, environmentalists and organized labor – usually come together at election time, but they do not have similar prospects for growth or success.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/what_the_election_means_for_the_left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart workers on strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employees protesting working conditions and retaliation are flexing their organizing muscle. But the first-of-its-kind strike carries risks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, for the first time in Wal-Mart’s 50-year history, workers at multiple<strong> </strong>stores are out on strike. Minutes ago, dozens of workers at Southern California stores launched a one-day work stoppage in protest of alleged retaliation against their attempts to organize. In a few hours, they’ll join supporters for a mass rally outside a Pico Rivera, Calif., store. This is the latest – and most dramatic – of the recent escalations in the decades-long struggle between organized labor and the largest private employer in the world.</p><p>“I’m excited, I’m nervous, I’m scared…” Pico Rivera Wal-Mart employee Evelin Cruz told Salon yesterday about her decision to join today’s strike. “But I think the time has come, so they take notice that these associates are tired of all the issues in the stores, all the management retaliating against you.” Rivera, a department manager, said her store is chronically understaffed: “They expect the work to be done, without having the people to do the job.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart warehouse strike heats up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warehouse Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The giant retailer had to shut down a distribution facility]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, 600-plus people marched to Wal-Mart's vast distribution warehouse in Elwood, Ill., to show support for 30 non-union workers who have been on strike since mid-September. Riot police were called in and arrested 17 people as a group of marchers sat down to block the road to the warehouse. However, in successfully shutting down the facility for the day, strikers and their supporters estimate their protest Monday cost the company several million dollars.</p><p>The civil disobedience also brought attention to the strike, which has continued for weeks with no media fanfare. Workers cite unsafe conditions and low wages as fueling their industrial action, along with complaints about long shifts with no breaks and sexual harassment. Micah Uetricht <a href="http://labornotes.org/2012/10/strike-supporters-shut-down-illinois-walmart-warehouse" target="_blank">reported for</a> Labor Notes on Monday's march, the strike and the reasons underpinning it:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/wal_mart_warehouse_strike_heats_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the lockout: another sign of labor&#8217;s slide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13023933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFL refs are back to work, but lots more American workers remain locked out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, three days after a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/how_ayn_rand_is_wrecking_football/singleton" target="_blank">blown call</a> that had even Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker pleading to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/dumb_tweet_when_scott_walker_supports_unions/singleton" target="_blank">“#Returntherealrefs</a>,” football’s union referees were back on the field. Just before midnight, management announced a deal had been reached on a new contract, ending a lockout marked by questionable calls and -- worse -- <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2012/09/25/909171/why-the-blown-call-on-monday-night-football-really-matters/" target="_blank">unsafe but unpunished</a> hits. As the “replacement” refs depart the field, talk of lockouts will fade from the news -- but they'll remain a growing trend in labor struggles across the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/rise_of_lockouts_another_sign_of_labors_slide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Won&#8217;t Back Down&#8221;: Why do teachers&#8217; unions hate America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gyllenhaal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Won't Back Down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viola Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Won't Back Down" is an offensive, lame, union-bashing drama, which somehow stars Viola Davis and Maggie Gyllenhaal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So teachers’ unions don’t care about kids. Oh, and luck is a foxy lady. This is what I took away from the inept and bizarre <a href="http://www.wbdtoolkit.com/">“Won’t Back Down,”</a> a set of right-wing anti-union talking points disguised (with very limited success) as a mainstream motion-picture-type product. Someone needs to launch an investigation into what combination of crimes, dares, alcoholic binges and lapses in judgment got Viola Davis and Maggie Gyllenhaal into this movie. Neither of them seems likely to sympathize with its thinly veiled labor-bashing agenda and, way more to the point, I thought they had better taste. Maybe it was that actor-y thing where they saw potential in their characters – a feisty, working-class single mom for Gyllenhaal, a sober middle-class schoolteacher for Davis – liked the idea of working together and didn’t think too much about the big picture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/wont_back_down_why_do_teachers_unions_hate_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s rampant farm-labor abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farmworker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13009019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new case exposes a thorny legal question: Who's responsible for sub-contracted labor exploitation?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/Prospect-Logo.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a></p><p>One morning earlier this year, in the borderland town of Brawley, California, 75-year-old Ignacio Villalobos perched on a chair in his trailer, removed a plastic bag from the well of a rubber boot, and finished dressing for work. Dawn was still an hour away, and in the wan light of the kitchen, Villalobos took off his house sandals and pulled the bag over his right foot. He bunched it at the ankle, then slipped his foot into his boot.</p><p>“These shoes aren’t made for water,” he said, adding that morning dew and irrigation keep farm fields damp—even in the desert of the Imperial Valley where he was working. Villalobos estimated that a pair of decent used boots would run him $30, almost half a day’s wages; the bags were free.</p><p>Villalobos moved quietly, trying to keep from waking his grown nephew, Roberto, who was sleeping in the back bedroom of the trailer. For years, Villalobos and his partner, Juana, had raised Roberto, whom they had taken in as an infant. Then, last year, Juana died after battling diabetes and heart disease, leaving the two men on their own. Villalobos tied his boot before repeating the process with his left foot and grabbed a bag of bologna sandwiches he had made that morning. By 6:15 A.M., he was out the door.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/californias_rampant_farm_labor_abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;They want to run us to death&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12991417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats will announce a pro-union platform in Charlotte -- but some convention workers say they're forgotten ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two weeks, Democrats will gather in Charlotte, N.C., and pledge once more to strengthen the right of workers to join unions and negotiate with their bosses. But the convention's success depends on the work of the city's sanitation workers, who are banned by law from exercising that right. As the party readies its platform pronouncements, those workers are asking for more concrete help.</p><p>Wednesday, leaders of a North Carolina union released a letter appealing to President Obama and the Democratic National Committee for support in their efforts to win union rights. “Despite the added work and dangers for Charlotte City workers in preparation for and in the aftermath of the DNC, and the fact that $50 million in federal funding has been allotted to the City of Charlotte to host the DNC,” the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) Local 150 wrote, “the City of Charlotte refuses to address the needs and rights of the City workers.”</p><p>“The workers are working like dogs,” said garbage driver Al Locklear, the president of Local 150’s Charlotte chapter. “They want to run us to death.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/they_want_to_run_us_to_death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart punishes its workers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12964746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employees who demonstrated against the company tell Salon they've lost their jobs and faced other consequences]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Wal-Mart celebrates its 50th anniversary this summer, it has faced a new wave of resistance from its “associates” -- the company’s corporate-speak for employees. Last month, a delegation of Wal-Mart workers brought their grievances to the company’s shareholder meeting, including low wages and understaffing. In interviews yesterday, three workers at the forefront of the campaign told Salon the company has punished them for their activism. Critics say that the world’s largest private sector employer is playing dirty once again.</p><p>Last June, nearly 100 Wal-Mart employees announced the formation of a new membership organization called OUR Walmart, which demanded improvements on the job. Though backed by the United Food and Commercial Workers union, it hasn’t sought union recognition (UFCW also <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/03/national/03walmart.html">backed</a> a previous non-union organization of Wal-Mart workers in 2005). OUR Walmart currently claims thousands of Wal-Mart workers in hundreds of stores as dues-paying members. As its efforts have escalated, OUR Walmart leaders say Wal-Mart has targeted them for punishment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/26/walmart_plays_dirty_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Parent trigger&#8221;: The latest tactic for fighting teachers&#8217; unions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12946378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal politicians are lining up behind "parent trigger" -- the latest attack on educators' bargaining rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wisconsin recall is now weeks past, but collective bargaining is still under assault nationwide. In cities and states across the country, public school teachers face threats not just to their benefits, but to their right to negotiate. And liberal Democrats are as likely as Scott Walker-style Republicans to be the ones mounting the attack.</p><p>Earlier this month, the U.S. Conference of Mayors held its annual meeting in Florida. It’s a diverse group, including leaders from both parties and all parts of the country. But it pulled off a unanimous endorsement of a pivotal piece of legislation: the anti-union education reform template proponents call “parent trigger.”</p><p>Parent trigger is the latest flashpoint in the wars over “education reform” (a term now claimed by right-wing front groups, defensive teachers' unions and activists of many stripes). It exemplifies the near-consensus of the media and financial elite: That teachers’ interests are opposed to those of kids and parents; that smoking out bad teachers trumps <a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2012/03/when_teachers_leave_schools_ov.html">improving teacher retention</a>; and that what’s needed in a crisis is to concentrate power. It also shows, anti-Walker rhetoric notwithstanding, that workers’ right to bargain is no Democratic Party sacrament.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/parent_trigger_the_latest_tactic_for_fighting_teachers_unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trans-Pacific Partnership: Larger than NAFTA?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12937895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaked documents reveal disturbing truths about a trade deal Obama's negotiating that could grow bigger than NAFTA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama campaigned in 2008 as a strong pro-labor candidate, and this year he will again. But for union activists who'll be working hard for his reelection, a newly leaked document represents yet another bitter disappointment.</p><p>The document contains draft text of a chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement currently being negotiated between the U.S. and eight Pacific countries. The Obama administration has shrouded the negotiation in secrecy, but the document, <a href="http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/tppinvestment.pdf" target="_blank">published by a coalition including the consumer group Public Citizen</a>, sheds a light on the process -- and the view isn’t pretty.</p><p>“The leaked document,” says Todd Tucker, the research director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division, “shows that in all of the major respects, this is exactly the same template that was used in NAFTA and other agreements that President Obama campaigned against.” Public Citizen warns that the provisions of the agreement would allow other countries to join in the future, giving it the potential to become a new global trade agreement, larger than NAFTA.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/trans_pacific_partnership_larger_than_nafta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can unions fight Super PACs?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12928905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AFL-CIO says labor will reshape its political operation. Not all union leaders think it goes far enough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one was surprised this winter when the AFL-CIO and its major unions endorsed President Obama’s reelection. Despite decades of enrollment decline, the AFL-CIO remains the largest membership organization in progressive politics, and it is a much relied-upon ally in Democratic election campaigns. But faced with a post-Citizens United landscape and armed with hard-fought lessons, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka is pledging a “big change” in how the federation does politics.</p><p>“Before, we used to build everybody else’s structure,” says Trumka, “and now, we’re going to build our own structure.”  He says to expect three changes: more focus on door-to-door organizing rather than TV ads; more funds toward building a permanent, independent political infrastructure and less towards candidates’ coffers; and more outreach beyond union households.</p><p>What could this look like for Obama’s reelection effort in Ohio or Elizabeth Warren’s Senate campaign in Massachusetts? Less direct campaign cash from unions and fewer union-backed TV ads on their behalf. More union volunteers, acting apart from the Democratic campaign, persuading and mobilizing people to vote for the candidates. And an organization pledged to better hold the candidates accountable if they win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/can_unions_fight_super_pacs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
