<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The New Republic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_new_republic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s have some more wars, TNR book critic says</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/lets_have_some_more_wars_tnr_book_critic_says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/lets_have_some_more_wars_tnr_book_critic_says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Republic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12678851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leon Wieseltier calls for the use of good old fashioned American power in Syria and maybe Iran, too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Republic literary editor and guy who also for some reason regularly writes political columns Leon Wieseltier <a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/washington-diarist/magazine/101717/iran-maddow-syria-war?passthru=YzIyYjI2N2E3OWYwOTI1YzY0YjE2ODYwYmNmN2EzYmU&amp;utm_source=The+New+Republic&amp;utm_campaign=b008c5fdef-TNR_Daily_031512&amp;utm_medium=email"><em>did not</em> enjoy Rachel Maddow's latest book, everyone.</a> He thinks it is "an anthropologically useful document of the new American disaffection with American force," by which he means it is annoyingly anti-war.</p><blockquote><p>Written in the same perky self-adoring voice that makes her show so excruciating, it offers some correct observations about certain lamentable trends in the American military— its reliance on contractors, its exploitation of reservists, its surfeit of nuclear weapons; but its righteous aim is to make the use of force itself seem absurd.</p></blockquote><p>You have to appreciate a literary critic who objects to the notion that war is absurd. (As for Leon Wieseltier calling out another author's "self-adoring" tone, well ... no one would ever accuse Wieseltier of being "perky," I suppose.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/lets_have_some_more_wars_tnr_book_critic_says/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/lets_have_some_more_wars_tnr_book_critic_says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Republic&#8217;s hack list equal parts fun and annoying</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/the_new_republics_hack_list_equal_parts_fun_and_annoying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/the_new_republics_hack_list_equal_parts_fun_and_annoying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Republic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10127770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal-baiting political magazine hits targets both deserving and not with "over-rated thinkers" take-down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Republic is out with their "lists" issue, because everyone loves lists. Much of the material is behind a paywall (you won't know who joins Evan Bayh and Lanny David <a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/96134/sell-outs">on "the sell-outs" list</a> unless you subscribe!) but they've <a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/96141/over-rated-thinkers">given us the entirety of their "over-rated thinkers" link</a> in order to generate cheap traffic through inspiring arguments and so on.</p><p>The list is a series of capsule-sized take-downs of media and political figures said to be public intellectuals.Some targets are incredibly easy (national laughingstock Newt Gingrich), and some are quite satisfying.</p><p>On foreign policy guru/TED conman Parag Khanna: "His recent book is actually called How to Run the World. It is a self-congratulatory anthology of clichés and platitudes—the life of the mind, Davos-style." And Fareed Zakaria, "exemplary spokesman for the always-evolving middle."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/the_new_republics_hack_list_equal_parts_fun_and_annoying/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/the_new_republics_hack_list_equal_parts_fun_and_annoying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

