<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_new_york_times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We don&#8217;t need truth vigilantes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12440051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But we do need good political reporting, and the media's rote repetition of Santorum's JFK lies fell short]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times public editor Arthur Brisbane got a lot of grief last month for a blog post in which he asked readers whether the Times ought to be <a href="http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/should-the-times-be-a-truth-vigilante/">"a truth vigilante."</a> I didn't join the pile-on, because truth be told, I kind of understood what he was getting at. Sure, "truth vigilante" is a shrill, easily mocked term: It doesn't take "vigilantism" to get at the truth, only good reporting. But there can be questions for editors and reporters about how far is too far – what's good reporting, and what's hectoring? What's debunking, and what's partisan water-carrying? (Also, I don't like the practice of mocking people for asking questions, even when we think the answer should be obvious. Better that Brisbane ask than to ignore the issue entirely.) I can understand why some cases aren't clear.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Shadid, the best of his generation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/anthony_shadid_the_best_of_his_generation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/anthony_shadid_the_best_of_his_generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I .P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12377621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NYT reporter, acclaimed for his unparalleled coverage of the Middle East, died in Syria on Thursday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WARSAW, Poland — I woke up this morning to the news that Anthony Shadid has died — apparently of an asthma attack — while on assignment in Syria. Whether you knew his byline or not, the loss is incalculable.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a></p><p>I can speak in absolutes about the quality of his work. No one reported the Middle East with greater clarity and nuance than Shadid. No one brought the humanity of the people of the region, people who live in a perpetual state of stress even when they are living in the comparative comfort of Beirut and Tel Aviv, to the wider world with a surer touch than Anthony.</p><p>He could have coasted on his one great advantage — fluency in Arabic — to beat other reporters to the story. He did not. He used it as a foundation to serve readers — and help colleagues. When I left Iraq after the overthrow of Saddam, a sizeable part of my heart was left behind with new friends who were struggling to make the country a better place. Amid the constant shifts in the chaotic post-war era, Anthony's dispatches were the ones I relied on to give me the complete picture of what was happening around the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/anthony_shadid_the_best_of_his_generation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/anthony_shadid_the_best_of_his_generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What David Brooks gets right about the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/what_david_brooks_gets_right_about_the_left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/what_david_brooks_gets_right_about_the_left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12306551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Relying on a mic check to make strategy is a big mistake]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As he often does, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/opinion/brooks-how-to-fight-the-man.html">in his column</a> Friday New York Times columnist David Brooks offered what looks like a “nonpartisan” analysis.  Social movements, he warned, are suffering because everyone thinks they should make up their own belief system. Unless you’re Nietzsche, Brooks advises, this is a guarantee of failure. Every man is not a political genius.</p><p>It’s not a hard task to figure out whom Brooks is really criticizing: Occupy Wall Street. But it's not alone. The democratization of ideology is vastly more tempting to the self-inventing liberal left than to the authoritarian right. Nobody does emotionally consistent talking points like the conservative right. Nobody does "whatever floats your boat" like the liberal left. The belief that every man is a philosopher makes progressives vastly more vulnerable to the destructive dynamic Brooks describes. It is an irony Brooks would appreciate that the left acts more like the right believes (and vice versa).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/what_david_brooks_gets_right_about_the_left/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/06/what_david_brooks_gets_right_about_the_left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;education crisis&#8221; myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/the_education_crisis_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/the_education_crisis_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12263181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ignore the media spin. Wages and working conditions -- not skills -- are the real reasons jobs get outsourced]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the term "education" become a code word? And if so, a code word for what?</p><p>These are the major unasked -- but resoundingly answered -- questions to emerge from two much-discussed articles about the future of American manufacturing. One is a cover story in the <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/01/making-it-in-america/8844/?single_page=true">Atlantic Monthly</a> about why jobs are being shipped overseas. It concludes that "to solve all the problems that keep people from acquiring skills would require tackling the toughest issues our country faces" -- the first of those being "a broken educational system." The second and even more talked about article comes from the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/business/apple-america-and-a-squeezed-middle-class.html">New York Times</a>. It looked at why Apple Computer has moved its production facilities overseas, concluding in sensationalistic fashion that "it isn't just that workers are cheaper abroad" but that America "has stopped training enough people in the mid-level skills that factories need."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/the_education_crisis_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/the_education_crisis_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspapers, &#8220;truth vigilantes&#8221; no more</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/newspapers_truth_vigilantes_no_more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/newspapers_truth_vigilantes_no_more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12189651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NYT's fact-checking question was absurd, but the real problem is that the press has lost its credibility]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time was when newspaper journalists prided themselves on being working stiffs: skeptical, cynical and worldly-wise. “If your mother says she loves you, check it out.” I’ve always preferred the unofficial motto of my native New Jersey: “Oh yeah, who says?”</p><p>Fact-check politicians? Here’s how H.L. Mencken saw things in 1924: “If any genuinely honest and altruistic politician had come to the surface in my time I’d have heard of him, for I have always frequented newspaper offices, and in a newspaper office the news of such a marvel would cause a dreadful tumult.”</p><p>Mencken could recall no such excitement. “The unanimous opinion of all the journalists that I know, excluding a few Liberals who are obviously somewhat balmy,” he added “… is that since the days of the national Thors and Wotans, no politician who was not out for himself, and himself alone, has ever drawn the breath of life in the United States.”</p><p>Alas, such attitudes went out of fashion with snap-brim fedoras, smoke-filled rooms and bottles of rye in desk drawers. Today’s national political reporters have attended fancy colleges, regard their professional affiliations as valuable status symbols, hence give every sign of identifying more with Washington courtiers and political professionals than the great unwashed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/newspapers_truth_vigilantes_no_more/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/newspapers_truth_vigilantes_no_more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Romney showdown: Krugman versus Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/13/a_romney_showdown_krugman_versus_brooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/13/a_romney_showdown_krugman_versus_brooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12163781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Mitt's CEO experience make him a good president? The New York Times Op-Ed columnists go to war]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let no one say that the New York Times Op-Ed page isn't a festival of diversity. On Friday, two esteemed regular columnists, Paul Krugman and David Brooks, tackled the same question -- will Mitt Romney's business experience position him to be a successful president? -- and delivered remarkably different answers.</p><p>Wait, no, that's not quite right. Shockingly, on at least a superficial level, Krugman and Brooks agree: Mitt's business experience as a private equity wheeler and dealer tells us nothing about whether he'd be a good president.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/13/opinion/krugman-america-isnt-a-corporation.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion">Krugman's argument is simple:</a> A country is not a corporation. What might make sense for the corporate bottom line -- for example, cutting costs by laying off employees and outsourcing production to foreign countries -- makes little sense for a nation. Krugman then moves into a familiar discussion of the downsides of austerity, a topic that, whether or not you agree with Keynesian economic policy, is at least relevant to the question at hand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/13/a_romney_showdown_krugman_versus_brooks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/13/a_romney_showdown_krugman_versus_brooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Krugman and the art of calling out a colleague</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/paul_krugman_and_the_art_of_calling_out_a_colleague/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/paul_krugman_and_the_art_of_calling_out_a_colleague/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Friedman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10233561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times columnist demolishes familiar arguments made by unnamed hacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times opinion section, like the Senate, has this rule where you aren't allowed to call out a colleague by name when you think he or she is full of shit. As in the Senate, this rule is silly and anachronistic and enforces a strained phony cordiality at the expense of honesty. It doesn't ever stop Paul Krugman, though, who simply responds to his columnist peers' dumb arguments without ever referring to them by name.</p><p>For example: David Brooks, whose most annoying schtick is to write something that sounds reasonable until you realize what he's <em>actually</em> arguing (like, for example, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/opinion/brooks-lets-all-feel-superior.html">"people often don't intervene when they see something horrible happening"</a> is a very interesting point, unless your real point is that <a href="http://deadspin.com/5860106/im-pretty-sure-david-brooks-just-blamed-the-penn-state-riots-on-woodstock">this is because of hippies and the terrible '60s</a>), wrote earlier this month that American income equality <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/opinion/brooks-the-wrong-inequality.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">is overstated</a>, and that the real income gap worth examining is that between the college-educated upper middle class, who are doing well, and those with only a high school education, who have been left behind by our post-industrial economy. (In this case Brooks' "actual" point is that "Blue inequality" is merely the resentment of educated liberals who hate success while "Red states" have the <em>real</em> authentic American inequality.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/paul_krugman_and_the_art_of_calling_out_a_colleague/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/paul_krugman_and_the_art_of_calling_out_a_colleague/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illustrating &#8220;Modern Love&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/modern_love_imprint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/modern_love_imprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10223466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times puts the beautiful artwork generated by its popular Sunday Styles column on display]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.salon.com/img/partners/ID_imprint.gif" alt="Imprint" align="left" /></a>On Nov. 3, the New York Times opened its doors, and its heart, for an exhibition of illustrations by Brian Rea and Christopher Silas Neal. Culled from their fruitful output for "Modern Love" -- a much beloved column in the paper’s Sunday Styles section -- the work speaks for itself, of course, but also for the talent and intelligence of the art directors. The illustrations are strong enough to stand on their own, even divorced from their newsprint context; and when they’re collected together in a new setting, a rich tapestry of experiences and stories emerges.</p><p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_3778l1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-230413 aligncenter" title="IMG_3778l" src="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_3778l1.jpg" alt="" width="460" /></a></p><p>As Modern Love’s creator, Dan Jones, writes in the show’s introduction:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/modern_love_imprint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/modern_love_imprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Katie Roiphe still doesn&#8217;t understand sexual harassment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/katie_roiphe_still_doesnt_understand_sexual_harassment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/katie_roiphe_still_doesnt_understand_sexual_harassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Roiphe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10216722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a staggeringly wrongheaded NYTimes piece, the controversial writer unloads more of the same-old cliched thinking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie Roiphe may disdain blogs, but she was born to troll them. Exactly <a href="http://mikkipedia.tumblr.com/post/12749237740/this-month-marks-20-years-that-katie-roiphe-has-been">20 years</a> after erupting into the public consciousness with a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1991/11/20/opinion/voices-of-the-new-generation-date-rape-hysteria.html">piece</a> that argued that hysterical feminists were unwisely legislating the brawny, intemperate sexual impulses of men and casting women as victims (with anti-rape activism, on campus), she's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/13/opinion/sunday/sex-harassment-what-on-earth-is-that.html?_r=1">back.</a> In the same space, the Op-Ed page of the New York Times, Roiphe argued Sunday that, yes, hysterical feminists are unwisely trying to legislate the brawny, intemperate sexual impulses of men and casting women as victims (with sexual harassment laws, in the workplace).</p><p>"The Morning After" -- the book that first rape-hysteria piece became -- has given way to "Groundhog Day."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/katie_roiphe_still_doesnt_understand_sexual_harassment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/katie_roiphe_still_doesnt_understand_sexual_harassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nick Kristof to the rescue!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10172085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a New York Times columnist live tweets a Cambodia brothel raid, who benefits -- the women or the reporter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof <a href="http://storify.com/johnmichaelnash/kristof-reports-on-brothel-raid">live-tweeted</a> a brothel raid in Cambodia. Kristof's novel approaches to international women-rights reporting have previously included purchasing two Cambodian underage prostitutes for the purpose of liberating them and <a href="http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/is-it-ever-ok-to-name-rape-victims/#more-4159">naming</a> a 9-year-old Congolese rape victim. After those generated criticism from victims' advocates, Kristof shouldn't be surprised that not everyone was cheering along his recent outing.</p><p>The narrative proceeded in a familiar fashion: There were villains, even some with military ties; then there is a rescue. Kristof tweeted, "Girls are rescued, but still very scared Youngest looks about 13, trafficked from Vietnam." And then, "Social workers comforting the girls, telling them they are free, won't be punished, rapes are over." He was accompanied by Cambodian anti-trafficking <a href="http://www.somaly.org/about-smf/somaly-mam">activist</a> and forced-prostitution survivor Somaly Mam. Post-presidential niece Lauren Bush <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LaurenBushTweet/status/133535869687709696">chimed</a> in perkily, "Awesome reporting by @NickKristof as the (sic) raided a brothel in Cambodia with @SomalyMam this morning!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/nick_kristof_to_the_rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mysteries of Pauline Kael</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/the_mysteries_of_pauline_kael/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/the_mysteries_of_pauline_kael/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10146841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years after the brilliant film critic's death two new books shed light on some of her puzzling idiosyncrasies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I most loved in Brian Kellow’s terrific <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9780670023127%26">new biography of Pauline Kael</a> was her open contempt for professors of English and film studies! Although she was very well-read, before and after her college years at Berkeley, she rightly detested pretension and pomposity. It was a revelation to me, thanks to Kellow’s ace research, that Kael (who had been born on a chicken farm in Petaluma) emerged from a bohemian San Francisco milieu suffused with Beat radicalism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/the_mysteries_of_pauline_kael/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/the_mysteries_of_pauline_kael/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michiko Kakutani will not give up &#8220;limn&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/michiko_kakutani_limn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/michiko_kakutani_limn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2011/08/17/michiko_kakutani_limn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obsessive watchers of the New York Times' chief book critic celebrate the return of her favorite obscure word]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times' Pulitzer Prize-winning book critic won't be stopped from using "limn" -- which means to depict or make a portrait of in words -- despite <a href="http://nymag.com/nymetro/arts/books/n_7968/">giving birth</a> to a <a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2003/12/0079835">parlor game</a> among <a href="http://marksarvas.blogs.com/elegvar/2007/05/the_first_lady_.html">publishing types</a> and <a href="http://www.mobylives.com/Limning_Kakutani.html">book bloggers</a>&#160;who love to note its overuse.</p><p>"Limn" returned in Tuesday's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/16/books/the-submission-by-amy-waldman-review.html?ref=michikokakutani">review</a> of Amy Waldman's anticipated first novel "The Submission," in a comparison between Waldman and the work of Tom Wolfe. "Unlike Mr. Wolfe, Ms. Waldman tends to favor sympathy over satire when it comes to limning her characters&#8217; feelings and motivations," Kakutani observed.</p><p>Limn-spotters had noticed that Kakutani's usage had trailed off -- this is just the second time we could find it in one of her reviews this year, and the first time since a March <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/books/inventing-george-washington-by-edward-g-lengel-review.html?pagewanted=all">review</a> of a book about the myths of George Washington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/michiko_kakutani_limn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/michiko_kakutani_limn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a photograph still change the world?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/somalia_famine_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/somalia_famine_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/02/somalia_famine_times</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYT editor explains why the paper ran an unforgettable photo. But will it effect change?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers of the New York Times&#160;this morning, whether in print or online, were perhaps shocked by the searing image of an emaciated Somali child, whose skin was wrapped so tightly around his body that the contours of a skeleton were clearly visible.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/world/africa/02somalia.html?_r=1&amp;hp">accompanying story</a>, written by Times reporter Jeffrey Gettleman, detailed a group of Somali insurgents accused both of blocking Western aid to the country, resulting in a severe famine, and of imprisoning refugees trying to flee to safety. Half a million Somali children are "on the verge of starvation," Gettleman reports. The photo itself -- by Times photographer Tyler Hicks and spread large across four columns on Page One -- was taken in Banadir Hospital, which Gettleman described as such:</p><blockquote>
<p>Every morning, emaciated parents with emaciated children stagger into Banadir Hospital, a shell of a building with floors that stink of diesel fuel because that is all the nurses have to fight off the flies. Babies are dying because of the lack of equipment and medicine. Some get hooked up to adult-size intravenous drips -- pediatric versions are hard to find -- and their compromised bodies cannot handle the volume of fluid.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/somalia_famine_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/somalia_famine_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor Goldman CEO is just &#8220;misunderstood&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/blankfein_goldman_sachs_profile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/blankfein_goldman_sachs_profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Let Them Eat Cake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/07/28/blankfein_goldman_sachs_profile</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New York mag profile paints Lloyd Blankfein as an Everyman. Also: NYT covers private jet traffic jams]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, I <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/07/13/great_recession_elitism_slideshow">published</a> a list of 10 of the most illustrative "Let them eat cake" moments of the Great Recession. But then I realized, as the Great Recession drags on, there's going to be an endless supply of such moments because, as this recent Associated Press headline proves, we're fast becoming a "let them eat cake" economy. So rather than having a finite list, I'm going to periodically cover the "let them eat cake" beat for Salon. Appropriately, this inaugural week's key "let them eat cake" moments involve Goldman Sachs' CEO Lloyd Blankfein and private jet traffic jams.</p><p>Let's start with Blankfein: This week, he was the subject of a glowing <a href="http://nymag.com/news/business/lloyd-blankfein-2011-8/">New York magazine profile</a> that reimagined the vampire-squid investment bank as an oppressed victim of undue criticism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/blankfein_goldman_sachs_profile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/blankfein_goldman_sachs_profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blaming abortion for disappearing girls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/01/abortion_sex_selection_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/01/abortion_sex_selection_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/06/30/abortion_sex_selection_debate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYT's Douthat thinks curtailing women's rights will solve the problem of sex selection. Here's why he's wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 1994 article for the journal First Things, Amherst College political scientist Hadley P. Arkes outlined a calculated plan for the antiabortion movement. "We seek simply to preserve the life of the child who survives the abortion," Arkes wrote. "From that modest beginning, we might go on to restrict abortions after the point of 'viability,' or we could ban those abortions ordered up simply because the child happens to be a female." Such limitations were useful steppingstones toward achieving what Arkes called the "ultimate end": banning all abortions.</p><p>Arkes saw opposing sex-selective abortion as a tactical maneuver, not a remotely feminist act, and 17 years later his strategy has taken hold. Antiabortion legislators are using the prevalence of sex selection in Asia to justify restrictions on abortion in the United States. Bans on sex-selective abortion have passed in four states -- Illinois, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma and Arizona -- and been proposed in five others this year -- Massachusetts, Rhode Island, West Virginia, New York and New Jersey. These bills are filled with language intended to set a precedent for declaring a fetus equivalent to a life.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/01/abortion_sex_selection_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/01/abortion_sex_selection_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who came up with the &#8220;low, sloping forehead&#8221; dis?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/low_sloping_forehead_diss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/low_sloping_forehead_diss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/29/low_sloping_forehead_diss</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NY Times' David Carr sparks red state rage over an offhand insult. We trace it to its prehistoric roots]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times media columnist David Carr sparked a ruckus after a Friday appearance on "Real Time With Bill Maher," where he referred to the states of Kansas and Missouri -- "the middle places" -- as "<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/06/24/nyts_david_carr_middle_places_home_of_low_sloping_foreheads.html">the dance of the low, sloping foreheads</a>." Conservatives pounced -- especially Glenn Beck, who darkly read eugenics and "<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-david-carrs-dig-at-the-midwest-is-the-sort-of-comment-that-leads-to-mass-death/">mass death</a>" into Carr's comments --&#160; while Carr <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/twitter/ryanchittum/~LZFMn">claimed</a> it was in jest, and that he could hardly be considered anti-red state, since he comes from and identifies with the Midwest.</p><p>We're apt to believe Carr (who didn't respond to an email from us) and write the whole thing off as a jokey misfire and desperate Fox campaigning. But we were interested in where that wonderful, vividly demeaning expression -- "dance of the low, sloping foreheads" -- came from.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/low_sloping_forehead_diss/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/low_sloping_forehead_diss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Page One&#8221;: Will the New York Times survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/page_one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/page_one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/06/14/page_one</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Follow the Gray Lady's navel-gazing reporters in this oddly compelling movie, which ends with a real cliffhanger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.magpictures.com/pageone/">"Page One: Inside the New York Times,"</a> Andrew Rossi's oddly exciting documentary about the august and struggling flagship of American journalism, is a movie without an ending. How could it be otherwise? We don't know how it's going to end for the Times, for "old media," for the so-called profession of journalism (a recent and amorphous invention) or, for that matter, for our perishing republic. All signs point to No, as the Magic 8-Ball might put it. But whether you view "Page One" as an inspirational call to arms or a chronicle of the Last Flight of the Noble Pteranodon -- hey, why is the sky getting darker? -- it's full of juicy, chewy nuggets for journalists, journalist-haters and news junkies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/page_one/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/14/page_one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our government&#8217;s terrifying food ads</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/department_of_agriculture_pig_cafeteria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/department_of_agriculture_pig_cafeteria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/01/department_of_agriculture_pig_cafeteria</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New exhibit reveals the twisted logic of the Department of Agriculture's marketing department through the years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's nothing more appetizing than giving human characteristics to the food you're about to eat. That's why we always see pictures of pigs with bibs on at rib houses; because for some horrible reason we feel better about eating Porky if we convince ourselves he's a cannibal.</p><p>I always wondered where that strange impulse came from, and now thanks to a new exhibit, "What's Cooking, Uncle Sam?" at the National Archives, I think I know. The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/01/dining/at-the-national-archives-life-liberty-and-carp.html">ran a piece yesterday about the show</a>, which focuses on posters, videos and other media from the Department of Agricultural, spanning all the way back to the revolutionary war.</p><p>The most fascinating of these photos is called "Pig Cafeteria":</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10008250' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/06/pig.jpg' />
  </p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2011/06/01/dining/20110601-ARCHIVE-12.html">caption reads</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>"The Pig Cafeteria" was an exhibit produced by the Department of Agriculture to educate farmers about new methods of farming and raising livestock &#8212; specifically, what to feed pigs so that they would be healthy and profitable.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/department_of_agriculture_pig_cafeteria/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/department_of_agriculture_pig_cafeteria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Army gives you superpowers!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/pentagon_propaganda_xmen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/pentagon_propaganda_xmen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/05/26/pentagon_propaganda_xmen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon has long used movies as a recruiting tool but its new X-Men campaign is dangerously hypocritical]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a breathless story somehow presented as a groundbreaking revelation, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/25/business/media/25adco.html">New York Times</a> this week tells us that the Pentagon is -- shocker! -- using all sorts of media channels to glorify militarism and sell it to the nation's children. The armed forces, of course, have been carefully constructing this child-focused Military-Entertainment Complex for the better part of three <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/15/sirota_excerpt_back_to_our_future">decades</a>. And that complex includes <a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2004/09/operation-hollywood">directly subsidizing Hollywood's pro-militarist films</a>, despite the Times' insistence that the military's financial support of "X-Men: First Class" represents the Army's "first sponsorship deal with a Hollywood film."</p><p>That said, the Times piece does include one important (if buried, decontextualized and unrecognized) piece of genuine news. It concerns a subtle-yet-insidious shift in the Pentagon's child-focused propaganda -- one that opens the military up to charges of rank hypocrisy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/pentagon_propaganda_xmen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/pentagon_propaganda_xmen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rewriting &#8220;Ulysses,&#8221; 140 characters at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/ulysses_twitter_11ysses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/ulysses_twitter_11ysses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/2011/05/25/ulysses_twitter_11ysses</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Joyce's modernist masterpiece gets a Twitter makeover]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's always been a fun mental exercise to imagine how famous historical figures would have dealt with Twitter. There's <a href="http://historicaltweets.com/">even a book about it</a>! But for "Stephen from Baltimore," Twitter can be used for more than interpreting famous thoughts ... it can redefine whole novels.</p><p>That's why he's created "Bloomsday Burst," an experiment in turning James Joyce's epic "Ulysses" <a href="http://11ysses.wordpress.com/">into a handful of tweets</a> representing each chapter of the 600-1,000 page book. Stephen's project has <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/25/joyce-meets-twitter-boiling-down-ulysses/?hp">its own New York Times blurb</a>, which is really a coup for a publication that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/14/technology/personaltech/14basics.html">just discovered Tumblr last year</a>.&#160; According to his rules:</p><blockquote>
<p>All volunteers need to do is choose a section, or several, from the 18 episodes, structured loosely on Homer&#8217;s epic, "then thoughtfully, soulfully, fancifully compose a series of 4-6 tweets to represent that section."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/ulysses_twitter_11ysses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/ulysses_twitter_11ysses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

