<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_new_york_times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How one company controls your breast cancer choices</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/how_one_company_may_control_your_breast_cancer_choices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/how_one_company_may_control_your_breast_cancer_choices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Myriad Genetics owns the genes that indicate breast-cancer risk – and the pricey test could be costing lives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, much of the heated discussion about Angelina Jolie's brave <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html?_r=0">Op-Ed</a> in the New York Times today has focused on her decision to undergo a double mastectomy after learning she carried the BRCA1 gene. As Salon noted <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/angelina_jolies_choice_need_not_be_yours/">here</a>, that's not the only option. But for those who do want to consider following Jolie's path, there are structural barriers to even gaining the information to make those choices, something she mentions but doesn't explain. It's because one company, Myriad Genetics, owns the patent to the two genes that indicate an increased risk of breast or ovarian cancer. You read that right: The genes themselves, not the procedure to test for them. And the Supreme Court will decide in a matter of weeks whether that should continue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/how_one_company_may_control_your_breast_cancer_choices/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/how_one_company_may_control_your_breast_cancer_choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrets of the NYPD</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[village voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Police Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYCLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's how a massive, taxpayer-funded public agency routinely ignores transparency laws]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Police Department has come under fire for the potentially unconstitutional execution of its stop-and-frisk policy, and surveillance of Muslims. But if you think that the taxpayer-funded agency should be accountable to the public and forthcoming about what it's doing, the story gets worse: It regularly flouts transparency laws, in an effort to make the records of how it perform its duties and the crimes it responds to next to impossible for the average citizen to obtain.</p><p>The NYPD’s roughly 34,500 officers serve a population of 8.2 million people, but multiple interviews with reporters who cover the police department, as well as organizations dedicated to transparency, reveal a police department stunning in its disregard for the information requests of citizens, advocacy groups and news organizations.</p><p>The city's Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, who is running for mayor, recently released a <a href="http://pubadvocate.nyc.gov/foil/report" target="_blank">report</a> asserting that a third of all Freedom of Information records requests to the police department were ignored. The numbers are no surprise to journalists who cover the department, such as Leonard Levitt, a veteran cops reporter who now writes at <a href="http://nypdconfidential.com/" target="_blank">NYPD Confidential</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to interpret Kirsten Gillibrand&#8217;s political opportunism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skilled, potential presidential candidate has changed many of her positions. But do the ends justify the means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not allowed, it seems, to write an article about New York Sen. and possible presidential hopeful Kirsten Gillibrand without comparing her to Tracy Flick (Politico yesterday dutifully <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">observed</a> the tradition). Yes, Gillibrand is ambitious, female and blonde and has been said to have sharp elbows -- it's taken less than that to trot out the "Election" protagonist before -- but there may be a more interesting comparison here: Mitt Romney.</p><p>When Gillibrand -- a hot topic in political circles this week, as a potential liberal <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">presidential candidate</a> and a champion for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/senate_takes_steps_to_reduce_sexual_violence_in_the_military/">addressing sexual assault in the military</a> -- was appointed to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat in 2009, Nate Silver <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/is-kennedys-loss-conservatives-gain.html">wrote</a>, "This is not a terrific outcome for progressive Democrats," because "Gillibrand, statistically speaking, has been one of the more conservative Democrats in the House. Moreover, she is a somewhat proud conservative, being a member of the Blue Dog caucus. In a state like New York, which is capable of electing and re-electing a very liberal senator, that’s a somewhat underachieving result for the Democrats."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 investigative videos: Stoned on the job</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5 investigative videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The I Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot Brownies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kids on Death Row]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From pot brownies to nerve-calming heads of lettuce, a look at the finest docs YouTube has to offer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/theifilestv"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/I-Files-logo_for-light-bkgd-e1362186166136.png" alt="The I Files" /></a> Notes to self after watching this week’s videos: Never get sent to death row in Yemen, try eating lettuce during a Syrian firefight to calm the nerves, and always nibble sparingly at the brownie when covering a medical marijuana event.</p><p>For a first look at the best news and documentaries available online, please take a moment to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdmqkUIfXt2cMBOLQsijMFg?sub_confirmation=1">subscribe to The I Files</a>, a highly digestible one-stop news source. Think of The I Files as a pot brownie you find at a party, a delectable treat that takes you on a magical mystery tour of the world’s news.</p><p>“High on the Job,” Center for Investigative Reporting</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9N9pe-8hvPs" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p>Ever had one of those days at work when one little mistake sends things spiraling out of control? This happened to Michael Montgomery, a reporter for KQED (the public TV station in San Francisco) and the Center for Investigative Reporting, when he inadvertently got a little too close to the story he was covering.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/top_5_investigative_videos_stoned_on_the_job_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reagan aide disqualifies himself from the conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/don%e2%80%99t_catch_his_eye_david_stockman%e2%80%99s_alien_abduction_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/don%e2%80%99t_catch_his_eye_david_stockman%e2%80%99s_alien_abduction_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Century Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Stockman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former budget director David Stockman makes outlandish calls for a divorce from the market and the state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I’m not being narrow-minded, but it seems to me there is a small number of enthusiasms that immediately disqualify those who indulge them as serious thinkers or policymakers.  When you learn that your Federal Reserve Chairman was an acolyte of Ayn Rand, for example, or that someone in Congress involved with budget policy remains a Rand devotee, you know instantly something’s gone terribly wrong.  You might even begin wondering whether this isn’t some monstrous financial equivalent of Caligula’s appointing a horse to the Roman Senate – or a ‘Rand’ to the American one.</p><p>We’ve all had the feeling:  You fall into conversation with some stranger on the subway or bus.  Or perhaps you are seated beside him at a concert or some other event.  Whatever the venue or circumstance, the conversation goes pleasantly for a while.  Your interlocutor makes various interesting observations about this subject or that.  He shows himself to experience the world much as do you and most others you’ve known.  He might even say something arrestingly perceptive or thoughtful at some juncture during your chat.  Then, without warning, it happens:  In the middle of a perfectly good sentence he throws in, as a sort of throwaway line or aside, some such observation as, ‘like that time the Venusians performed those experiments on me up on Telos Nine, before taking me back to the Bryant Park carousel and then flying home.  (They still call me, you know.)’</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/don%e2%80%99t_catch_his_eye_david_stockman%e2%80%99s_alien_abduction_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/don%e2%80%99t_catch_his_eye_david_stockman%e2%80%99s_alien_abduction_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-gay marriage: Indefensible</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_new_nicer_anti_gay_marriage_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_new_nicer_anti_gay_marriage_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ross Douthat and others try their best, but the arguments for "traditional" marriage aren't getting any better]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After days spent carefully studying the oral arguments in the two cases currently before the Supreme Court involving gay marriage, and then a nationwide attempt to read Justice Kennedy's mind, we now must wait months to learn what the Court will actually do. The debate has naturally shifted back to our toxic cable news, inane Sunday shows, and stultifying newspaper columns, where the evolution of gay marriage opposition is well underway. Not evolution necessarily to support, but to a politer form of opposition.</p><p>At this point it's apparent that every Democrat seeking the presidency in 2016 will be pro-same-sex marriage. If trends hold, a large majority of the country will be with them as well. But it's impossible to say whether and which Republicans running over the next few election cycles will be vocally opposed, supportive or totally noncommittal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_new_nicer_anti_gay_marriage_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_new_nicer_anti_gay_marriage_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: Christine Quinn has a temper</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers debate: Is the story anti-woman, or pro-not being a terrible person?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 1,668-word article sparking an array of reactions, the New York Times on Tuesday digs deep into New York mayoral candidate Christine Quinn's temper. (It is a very, very bad temper, the article explains.)</p><p>Reporters Michael Grynbaum and David Chen provide a few lines in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/26/nyregion/in-private-quinn-displays-a-volatile-side.html?hp&amp;_r=0&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">front-page story</a> to explain that Rudy Giuliani was also a political hothead and that Republican mayoral candidate Joseph J. Lhota once challenged a 77-year-old Holocaust survivor to “be a man.” The rest of the piece includes passages like this:</p><blockquote><p>A session of the <a title="More articles about City Council (New York City)" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/city_council_new_york_city/index.html?inline=nyt-org">New York City Council</a> had descended into chaos, and lawmakers were openly questioning her leadership. Ms. Quinn, the Council speaker, decided there was one person to blame: Betsy Gotbaum, then the city’s public advocate, who had been presiding.</p> <p>The response was sudden and fierce. Ms. Quinn summoned Ms. Gotbaum to an office nearby and, with little warning, began shouting at her in increasingly angry tones about appearing weak in front of other lawmakers.</p> <p>“You were like Bambi in there!” Ms. Quinn exclaimed, slamming her hand on a table for emphasis, according to Ms. Gotbaum, who was on crutches at the time.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I let Wall Street walk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Breuer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Taibbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Department prosecutor Lanny Breuer gives an unapologetic exit interview to Dealbook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve never seen as relatively unheralded an official as the head of the criminal division at the Justice Department get so many exit interviews in national newspapers.  But Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, who’s retiring to spend more time with his family at white-shoe law firms on Wall Street, has been given multiple chances to make a last impression.  When you spend nearly four years and fail to prosecute anyone of significance for the financial crisis that caused millions of foreclosures, layoffs and a giant hole in the economy that has still not been papered over, I guess you need your pals in the establishment to help you plead your case.</p><p>This interview with the <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/28/breuer-reflects-on-prosecutions-that-were-and-werent/">New York Times’ Dealbook</a> (sponsored today by the financial firm Allianz) is no different. As a prelude, he gets a commendation from former Attorney General and current corporate lawyer Michael Mukasey (always good to have the lawyer from the other side of the table, defending those you could have but chose not to prosecute, praising your work). He gets phantom criticism from unnamed members of “the Occupy Wall Street crowd” and “Rolling Stone magazine,” a reference to Matt Taibbi. There’s no easier way to marginalize critics than to refuse to name them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/why_i_let_wall_street_walk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shedding a tear for the International Herald Tribune</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/shedding_a_tear_for_the_international_herald_tribune/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/shedding_a_tear_for_the_international_herald_tribune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Herald-Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expatriates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times kills off a 125-year-old brand. Expats of a certain age raise a sad toast]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aging American expats who still remember those halcyon pre-Internet days surely felt a pang at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/26/business/media/herald-tribune-to-be-renamed-the-international-new-york-times.html?smid=tw-share">the news</a> that the New York Times is changing the name of the "International Herald Tribune" to the "International New York Times."</p><p>"The announcement is part of the company’s larger plan to focus on its core brand and build its international presence, the Times spokeswoman said," reports the New York Times.</p><p>One might wonder how something can simultaneously be called "International" and "New York" but the ugliness of the new title shouldn't distract from the logic of the rebranding. The Times has recently been jettisoning anything and everything that doesn't have the flagship brand name attached (the Boston Globe, About.com, et cetera).  The bean counters are probably right, this time. We're not talking Maker's Mark announcing it is about to start watering down its bourbon. There will be no social media outrage that reverses this slap at history. When all media are available everywhere all the time, your brand is what sets you apart. Double down, New York Times, double down.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/shedding_a_tear_for_the_international_herald_tribune/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/shedding_a_tear_for_the_international_herald_tribune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the man trolling America&#8217;s liberal elite</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/meet_the_man_trolling_americas_liberal_elite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/meet_the_man_trolling_americas_liberal_elite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael goldfarb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13210487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Goldfarb has made a career as an "all-around anti-liberal provocateur," according to the New York Times]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/24/us/politics/michael-goldfarb-gleeful-provocateur-at-intersection-of-many-worlds.html?pagewanted=1">has described</a> Michael Goldfarb, the 32-year-old founder of conservative site <a href="http://freebeacon.com/">Washington Free Beacon</a> as an "all-around anti-liberal provocateur,"a "hawkish magnet of liberal scorn"  who is "known as a flamethrower on both sides of the aisle;" a man who revels in this reputation so much that he identifies himself as a cudgel. The most recent controversy that Goldfarb's stirred up? Digging up a report of questionable merit that eventually led to the Senate Republicans filibustering the defense secretary nomination of former Sen. Chuck Hagel.</p><p>As the Times explains, Goldfarb has made a career out of controversy:</p><blockquote><p>"Often working with money from major Republican donors, most of whom have preferred anonymity, Mr. Goldfarb has been in the middle of nearly every major partisan dispute of Mr. Obama’s presidency — over Iran, Israel, terrorism policy and now Mr. Hagel and guns. For a time, Mr. Goldfarb worked as a communications strategist to the leading bêtes noires of liberals, the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/meet_the_man_trolling_americas_liberal_elite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/meet_the_man_trolling_americas_liberal_elite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times says Chinese hackers attacked its computers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/nytimes_says_chinese_hackers_attacked_its_computers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/nytimes_says_chinese_hackers_attacked_its_computers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wen Jiabao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber-security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13186888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The paper discovered it was repeatedly infiltrated while investigating wealth of China's PM]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/technology/chinese-hackers-infiltrate-new-york-times-computers.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=0&amp;nl=todaysheadlines&amp;emc=edit_th_20130131">reported</a> Wednesday night that over the past four months, hackers -- possibly connected to the Chinese military -- have been infiltrating the paper's computer system. The Times hired cyber-security firm Mandiant, who traced the attacks to to university computers that the "Chinese military had used to attack United States Military contractors in the past."</p><p>According to the Times, the attacks were likely in response to stories published last year by the paper's Shangai bureau chief David Barboza, which reported the vast personal wealth of Chinese PM Wen Jiabao. Following the publication of these stories the Times site  was blocked in China and its reporters there suddenly faced visa problems.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/nytimes_says_chinese_hackers_attacked_its_computers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/nytimes_says_chinese_hackers_attacked_its_computers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital subscriptions might be going up for NYT readers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/digital_subscriptions_might_be_going_up_for_nyt_readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/digital_subscriptions_might_be_going_up_for_nyt_readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times may be "testing the waters" for a double or triple price increase ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some buzz going around Twitter right now about a possible double (or triple) price increase on digital subscriptions to the New York Times.</p><p>Ellen Gray of the Philadelphia Daily News tweeted about a survey the Times is conducting about changing the digital subscription package, and charging more for it:</p><p>[embedtweet id="293707714994008065"]</p><p>The Times' response to Gray was noncommittal:</p><blockquote><p>We are simply revisiting concepts for how to package our core digital subscription bundles and/or potentially introduce new paid products as we close in on two years after the digital subscription launch. Like always, we rely on consumer research.</p></blockquote><p>It's unclear if retooling the digital subscription has anything to do with <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/03/new-york-times-seeks-buyouts-from-30-newsroom-managers/" target="_blank">recent buyouts</a> and other cost-cutting measures at the paper, but we'll keep you posted as the story develops.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/digital_subscriptions_might_be_going_up_for_nyt_readers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/digital_subscriptions_might_be_going_up_for_nyt_readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mean nasty Internet killed Manti Te&#8217;o&#039;s fake dead girlfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/the_mean_nasty_internet_killed_manti_teos_fake_dead_girlfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/the_mean_nasty_internet_killed_manti_teos_fake_dead_girlfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manti Te'o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absurdity alert: The Times says our "commitment-free" digital life is responsible for the Notre Dame hoax]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the Internet, nobody ever fell victim to a hoax.</p><p>Before the Internet, superficiality did not exist. We all lived lives of profound and deep connection.</p><p>Before the Internet, Manti Te'o's girlfriend would have been constructed out of flesh and blood. And when she died, she'd really be dead.</p><p>All these important truths can be gleaned from <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/the-hoax-of-digital-life/">"The Hoax of Digital Life,"</a> an opinion column by Timothy Egan published in the New York Times on Friday.</p><p>Egan's not down with the virtual life: The whole bizarre fake dead girlfriend saga that engulfed star Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te'o? <em>It's the Internet's fault!</em></p><blockquote><p>The Internet is the cause of much of today’s commitment-free, surface-only living; it’s also the explanation for why someone could tumble head-over-heels for a pixelated cipher. Online dating was only the start of what led us down this road."</p> <p>Te’o called himself a victim of an elaborate hoax. If he’s telling the truth, he’s right in one sense, but wrong in his conclusion. He’s a victim of his age, people who are more willing to embrace fake life through a screen than the real world beyond their smartphone.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/the_mean_nasty_internet_killed_manti_teos_fake_dead_girlfriend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/the_mean_nasty_internet_killed_manti_teos_fake_dead_girlfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nate Silver: Political pundits more delusional than sports fans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/nate_silver_political_pundits_more_delusional_than_sports_fans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/nate_silver_political_pundits_more_delusional_than_sports_fans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During his Reddit "Ask Me Anything," the statistician discussed the frustrations of quantitative political analysis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate Silver <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/166yeo/iama_blogger_for_fivethirtyeight_at_the_new_york">took to Reddit </a>on Tuesday and invited its denizens to "ask [him] anything." The online Q&amp;A revealed a little of the man behind the "wizard."</p><p>Silver admitted he is sometimes tempted by, but wouldn't act on, the desire to use his prediction methods to profit from election betting markets (which are heavily influenced by his predictions):</p><blockquote><p>Tempted, yes, but sometimes resisting temptation is a good thing.</p></blockquote><p>He explained that he would like to make his methodology more open to readers of his FiveThirtyEight NYT blog:</p><blockquote><p>I’d certainly like to aim to increase the level of disclosure at 538 going forward. Sometimes what happens is that I have best intentions to write a super detailed, 5000-word methodology post, and then some senate candidate does or says something stupid, and I get caught up in the news cycle and it gets forgotten about. Which is a pretty lame excuse, I know.</p></blockquote><p>He told questioners that his statistical analysis is particularly well suited to certain aspects of politics -- notably presidential elections -- but cannot be used to predict the outcome of many political debates, such as gun control. When asked if he could predict whether gun control would make America safer or not, he answered:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/nate_silver_political_pundits_more_delusional_than_sports_fans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/nate_silver_political_pundits_more_delusional_than_sports_fans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drone strikes lead to deadly reprisals for spies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/drone_strikes_lead_to_deadly_reprisals_for_spies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/drone_strikes_lead_to_deadly_reprisals_for_spies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times details how al-Qaida tracks down, tapes and murders CIA's low paid informants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times' Saturday<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/30/world/asia/drone-war-in-pakistan-spurs-militants-to-deadly-reprisals.html?pagewanted=2&amp;hp"> highlighted</a> another dark product of U.S. drone attacks in Pakistan. Local informants who aid the CIA are tracked down and slaughtered by al-Qaida militants. According to the Times:</p><blockquote><p>For several years now, militant enforcers have scoured the tribal belt in search of informers who help the C.I.A. find and kill the spy agency’s jihadist quarry. The militants’ technique — often more witch hunt than investigation — follows a well-established pattern. Accused tribesmen are abducted from homes and workplaces at gunpoint and tortured. A sham religious court hears their case, usually declaring them guilty. Then they are forced to speak into a video camera.</p> <p>The taped confessions, which are later distributed on CD, vary in style and content. But their endings are the same: execution by hanging, beheading or firing squad.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/drone_strikes_lead_to_deadly_reprisals_for_spies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/drone_strikes_lead_to_deadly_reprisals_for_spies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT public editor calls out paper over Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretrial hearing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Times should be there" at the pretrial hearings, argues Margaret Sullivan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan <a href="http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/the-times-should-have-a-reporter-at-the-bradley-manning-hearing/">Wednesday joined</a> a chorus of voices criticizing her paper for failing to send reporters to Pfc. Bradley Manning's pretrial hearings.</p><p>While the Times' Washington Bureau chief David Leonhardt defended the decision to simply republish an AP wire on the proceedings, Sullivan took the Grey Lady to task. "The testimony is dramatic and the overarching issues are important," she wrote.</p><p>Leonhardt told the public editor via email:</p><blockquote><p>As with any other legal case, we won’t cover every single proceeding. In this case, doing so would have involved multiple days of a reporter’s time, for a relatively straightforward story. The A.P. article recounting the main points of Mr. Manning’s testimony about his conditions of confinement that ran on page A3 of The Times conveyed fundamentally the same material as a staff story would have.</p></blockquote><p>However, as Times reader David Morf noted in a reprinted letter, using AP wire copy "let the story bury itself." Following Sullivan's piece, a number of commentators have taken issue with Leonhardt's reference to "any other legal case," since for many Manning's treatment by the U.S. military and his role as a whistle-blower make  his case exceptional.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US-approved weapons wound up with Libyan militants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/us_approved_weapons_wound_up_with_libyan_militants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/us_approved_weapons_wound_up_with_libyan_militants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muammar Gaddafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to keep fingerprints off Libyan operations, the U.S. approved arms shipments it could not control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html?pagewanted=all"> reported</a> that the Obama administration secretly approved arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but later learned that the weapons were being turned over to Libya's Islamist militant fighters. According to the Times:</p><blockquote><p>The United States, which had only small numbers of C.I.A. officers in Libya during the tumult of the rebellion, provided little oversight of the arms shipments. Within weeks of endorsing Qatar’s plan to send weapons there in spring 2011, the White House began receiving reports that they were going to Islamic militant groups. They were “more antidemocratic, more hard-line, closer to an extreme version of Islam” than the main rebel alliance in Libya, said a former Defense Department official.</p></blockquote><p>More than a year after the overthrow of Gaddafi, Libyan authorities have failed to establish full control over Libya’s disparate armed factions. According to the Times, "The weapons and money from Qatar strengthened militant groups in Libya, allowing them to become a destabilizing force since the fall of the Qaddafi government."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/us_approved_weapons_wound_up_with_libyan_militants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/us_approved_weapons_wound_up_with_libyan_militants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch &#8220;SNL&#8217;s&#8221; Guy Fieri sketch that didn&#8217;t air</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/watch_snls_guy_fieri_sketch_that_didnt_air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/watch_snls_guy_fieri_sketch_that_didnt_air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seth myers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bobby moynihan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fieri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fieri skit snl didn't air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC has released dress rehearsal footage of Bobby Moynihan as Guy Fieri]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"SNL" almost brought back Bobby Moynihan as restaurateur Guy Fieri, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/guy_fieri_responds_to_scathing_times_review/">who made headlines last week</a> when the New York Times' Pete Wells lambasted Fieri's Times Square restaurant in a scathing review. Although the scene didn't air, NBC released the dress rehearsal Weekend Update sketch that imagines what it must have been like for Fieri to read Wells' review for the first time:</p><p><iframe id="nbc-video-widget" src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=1424442" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/watch_snls_guy_fieri_sketch_that_didnt_air/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/watch_snls_guy_fieri_sketch_that_didnt_air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guy Fieri responds to scathing Times review</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/guy_fieri_responds_to_scathing_times_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/guy_fieri_responds_to_scathing_times_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fieri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The television host and restaurateur responds to Peter Wells' harsh critique of Fieri's new restaurant UPDATED]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong>  Ironically, the New York Times <a href="http://www.thebraiser.com/guy-fieri-nyt-staff-party/">held an event</a> at Guy Fieri's restaurant the same day that Peter Wells' nasty review came out. The Times stated, "The Times ad sales department hosted an event for clients at the restaurant last night. The event was planned two months ago.”</p><p>*</p><p>Guy Fieri responded this morning to the New York Times' negative <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/dining/reviews/restaurant-review-guys-american-kitchen-bar-in-times-square.html?pagewanted=1&amp;smid=fb-share">review</a> of his new Times Square restaurant, Guy’s American Kitchen &amp; Bar. (The review was so <a href="http://newyork.grubstreet.com/2012/11/twitter-reactions-to-pete-wells-guy-fieri-review.html">mean-spirited</a> that it went viral yesterday). On the "Today" show Fieri said, "There's good and there's bad in the restaurant business, but that to me went so overboard, it really seemed like there was another agenda."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/guy_fieri_responds_to_scathing_times_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/guy_fieri_responds_to_scathing_times_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some military scandals are far worse than others</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/some_military_scandals_are_far_worse_than_others/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/some_military_scandals_are_far_worse_than_others/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following Petraeus, the New York Times worries about military leadership ethics and forgets to take rape seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many military endeavors raise ethical challenges, a recent string of personal misdeeds by senior officers has chipped away at long-held ideas about moral fortitude in the armed forces. In an attempt to illustrate this, however, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/us/petraeuss-resignation-highlights-concern-over-military-officers-ethics.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=0&amp;emc=eta1">the New York Times' Thom Shaker</a> listed extramarital affairs alongside serious incidents of rape and assault in the military as examples of "inappropriate behavior."</p><p>"A worrisomely large number of senior officers have been investigated and even fired for poor judgment, malfeasance and sexual improprieties or sexual violence — and that is just in the last year," Shaker noted Monday, giving a host of examples:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/some_military_scandals_are_far_worse_than_others/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/some_military_scandals_are_far_worse_than_others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
