<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The Republican takeover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_republican_takeover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:41:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Deadbeat dad Joe Walsh rewarded for &#8220;support of the family&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Perkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10162515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Family Research Council celebrates the "pro-family" credentials of a guy who owes six figures in back child support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Walsh has earned a 100% "True Blue" rating from the Family Research Council, the evangelical lobbying organization and hideous advocate of assorted bigotries. Not Joe Walsh the Eagle, but <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/8598963-418/rep-walsh-lauded-by-group-for-being-pro-family-though-accused-of-owing-child-support.html">Joe Walsh the "Tea Party" freshman congressman who,</a> not coincidentally, owes more than $100,000 in back child support that he refuses to pay.</p><p>FRC lauds Walsh for his "unwavering support of the family," by which they don't mean <em>his</em> family, because obviously his support for them has been known to waver. But supporting one's actual children is less important, to Tony Perkins and his organization, than Walsh's steadfast belief that the government's sole responsibility is to ensure that life is as difficult and miserable as possible for women and gay people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/deadbeat_dad_joe_walsh_rewarded_for_support_of_the_family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner totally owned Barack Obama on the phone, according to Boehner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/john_boehner_obama_phone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/john_boehner_obama_phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10113344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Speaker releases amusingly self-congratulatory account of phone call with the president to the press]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner wants everyone to know that he gave the president what-for yesterday. Boehner is a fairly ineffectual House Speaker who has on multiple occasions <a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/219610/will-john-boehner-ever-be-able-to-control-his-caucus">held important votes</a> that he has lost embarrassingly. But while he may not be able to control his caucus, he can certainly let everyone know that he yelled at Barack Obama. That's why the Speaker's office <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65927.html">released "an unusually detailed account" of his phone conversation</a> with the president to the press.</p><p>The president had called Boehner to congratulate him on passing those pointless trade agreements. But Boehner wanted to talk about how Obama had accused the GOP of not having a jobs plan. That won't fly with hard-charging House Speaker John Boehner! According to Boehner's summary of how cool and in control he was on the phone, Boehner had no time for these congratulations. "I want to make sure you have all the facts," Boehner said, according to Boehner:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/john_boehner_obama_phone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/john_boehner_obama_phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is what Rick Perry said about Bernanke any worse than usual for Rick Perry?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/rick_perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/rick_perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/16/rick_perry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas governor and sudden 2012 front-runner inspires media outrage by acting like he always acts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Texas governor and sudden Republican presidential front-runner Rick Perry said that <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/08/16/perry_treason_bernanke/index.html">if Ben Bernanke tried any of that money-printing stuff in Texas, he'd be strung up.</a> "If this guy prints more money between now and the election," Perry told some Iowans, "I don&#8217;t know what y'all would do to him in Iowa, but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas." (Iowa's last execution was in 1963, so Iowa would probably not kill him.)</p><p>Among many Americans, especially wealthy rich white political pundits who live in gated communities in Maryland, it is considered "folksy" and charming to explicitly remind people of and seemingly endorse America's ugly history of lynch mobs doling out "frontier justice," but even among those who see nothing wrong with whitewashed nostalgia for gruesome, lawless vigilantism, Perry's comments were thought to have gone a bit too far. (Accusing the Republican-appointed chairman of the Federal Reserve of "treason" was a "serious unforced error," <a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/08/15/perry-bernanke-treason-2/">according to John Podhoretz.</a>) New York Times Washington correspondent Binyamin Appelbaum summed up one strand of establishment response to the comments <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/BCAppelbaum/status/103294313353576448">by calling Perry's remarks "horrifying."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/rick_perry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/rick_perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Joe Walsh not very hawkish on debt he owes to ex-wife</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/joe_walsh_debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/joe_walsh_debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/28/joe_walsh_debt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: The Tea Party freshman owes more than $100,000 in child support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Walsh refuses to saddle his kids with one more penny of government debt, or, alternately, one penny of his congressional salary.</p><p><a href="http://www.suntimes.com/6720892-417/tea-party-rep.-joe-walsh-sued-for-100000-in-child-support">The Chicago Sun-Times has a big story</a> on the Tea Party Freshman -- who is on TV 100 times a day shouting about how we need to balance the budget -- and the $117,437 he owes his ex-wife, which she has been attempting to collect for years.</p><p>You know how bad pundits and annoying politicians like to pretend the Federal government is like a household when they talk about how we need to balance our books? If we take that flawed analogy seriously, it does not really make a lot of sense to trust the budget to someone Joe Walsh, a private sector failure who is hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, whose condo was foreclosed on, and who is unable to make his child support payments. On a six-figure salary! And he's dumb enough to pay for his health insurance out of pocket instead of getting it through his workplace -- with a wife with a preexisting condition -- <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/07/walsh-explains-refusal-of-government-health-care/">to prove some inane point.</a> Meanwhile, while he was semi-employed and not paying his ex-wife for his children's expenses, he was apparently going on multiple foreign vacations. And he loaned his congressional campaign $35,000. This guy's horrible at budgets and living within his means! He should not be allowed anywhere near debt ceiling negotiations! (The Joe Walsh Balanced Budget Act: Don't pay any of your creditors and spend most of your time arguing with Chris Matthews.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/joe_walsh_debt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/joe_walsh_debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is why the United States is doomed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/this_why_the_united_states_is_doomed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/this_why_the_united_states_is_doomed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/06/03/this_why_the_united_states_is_doomed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP response to the jobs report: The Earth is flat and two plus two equals five]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hill reports the <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/801-economy/164627-house-gop-blames-white-house-over-spending-for-weak-job-growth">House Republican response</a> to Friday morning's <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/unemployment/index.html?story=/tech/htww/2011/06/03/may_jobs_report">distressing jobs report.</a></p><blockquote> <p>House Republicans pinned the blame for Friday's disappointing jobs report squarely on the White House, saying the Obama administration's "over-taxing, over-regulating and over-spending" has stifled economic growth.</p> <p>"One look at the jobs report should be enough to show the White House it's time to get serious about cutting spending and dealing with our ailing economy," Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said.</p> </blockquote><p>How many blatant untruths can a Republican speaker of the House stuff into one sentence? Quite a few!</p><p>1) President Obama has cut taxes. His stimulus bill included tax cuts for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/us/politics/19taxes.html">95 percent of all American working families.</a> He signed off on the extension of the Bush tax cuts, while throwing in a new payroll tax cut for good measure.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/this_why_the_united_states_is_doomed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/this_why_the_united_states_is_doomed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>187</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Patrick McHenry, the rudest, most shameless College Republican in Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course he was unfair to Elizabeth Warren: He was trained by the most cutthroat political organization around]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_McHenry#Connections_with_Countrywide_Mortgage_Scandal">Countrywide</a>) called Elizabeth Warren a liar at the conclusion of a House Oversight subcommittee hearing that had already consisted mainly of Republican members of Congress getting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/24/elizabeth-warren-liar-gop-facts-cfpb_n_866505.html">very basic information about Warren's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau completely wrong.</a> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RET2Z5AVJ8A" width="425"></iframe></p><p>McHenry has been one of the most completely shameless of House Republicans since his arrival in Congress, in 2005, when he immediately and publicly endorsed Tom DeLay's brilliant plan to exempt himself from ethics rules as his connections to Jack Abramoff began to end his career. But he was born to be cheerfully corrupt: He's a product of the College Republicans, an organization that trains little Lee Atwaters, Karl Roves and Grover Norquists in the arts of scorched-earth campaigning and wholly irresponsible "governing" on behalf of the monied interests that bought you your job. The ethos is win by any means necessary, legal or quasi-legal (or worse, as long as you never get caught), and McHenry was very good at that, according to <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0510.wallace-wells.html">Benjamin Wallace-Wells' memorable profile of the then-freshman in the Washington Monthly.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A GOP dream come true: Florida Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/triumph_of_the_free_market_florida_inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/triumph_of_the_free_market_florida_inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/04/20/triumph_of_the_free_market_florida_inc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Developers, start your engines! Corporate cash and Republican control equals fun in the sun for the business lobby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida has long been a case study in out-of-control sprawl and wanton environmental destruction for many decades, but in the mid-80s the state attempted to get its act together by passing a growth management law that reined in the freedom of local governments to sell their souls to the nearest deep-pocketed developer.</p><p>That was then. Now Florida is governed by&#160; Republican super-majorities in both the House and Senate and an arch-conservative in the state house and the developers are fighting back. <a href="http://staugustine.com/news/local-news/2011-04-19/reduced-oversight-coming-growth-laws">The growth management law is about to be gutted</a> -- along with just about every other currently existing hindrance to the corporate freedom to gouge as much cash as possible out of the Sunshine state</p><p><a href="http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2011-04-17/news/os-florida-chamber-pressing-broad-age20110417_1_florida-chamber-corporate-millions-companies">The Orlando Sentinel has the deeply depressing, but essential story.</a> An overwhelming flood of corporate campaign donations to Republicans in Florida has achieved an astonishing capitalist makeover. It's pay-off day!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/triumph_of_the_free_market_florida_inc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/triumph_of_the_free_market_florida_inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicare&#8217;s perfect storm</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/13/medicare_lyndon_johnson_and_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/13/medicare_lyndon_johnson_and_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/04/13/medicare_lyndon_johnson_and_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The roots of modern GOP resistance to healthcare reform date back to 1964, when Johnson clobbered Goldwater]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History remembers Lyndon Johnson as the creator of Medicare and Medicaid, but Barry Goldwater, the arch-conservative Johnson annihilated in the 1964 presidential election, deserves his fair share of the credit. A month before Election Day, Goldwater interrupted his campaign in Arizona to fly back to Washington for the sole purpose of voting no on a key precursor to what became Medicare. The Johnson campaign capitalized immediately with a television ad pointing out that Goldwater had voted "against a program of hospital insurance for older Americans."</p><p>     <object height="370" width="434"><param name="movie" value="http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/flash/player.swf?id=4360" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" height="370" src="http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/flash/player.swf?id=4360" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="434"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/13/medicare_lyndon_johnson_and_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/13/medicare_lyndon_johnson_and_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina GOP confirms five clowns for first 2012 debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/south_carolina_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/south_carolina_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/08/south_carolina_debate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pawlenty, Ron Paul, Gingrich, Buddy Roemer, and Rick Santorum are your official candidates for president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/JFKucinich/status/56439425202257921">Five candidates</a> have been confirmed for the first presidential debate of the 2012 election. On May 5, Newt Gingrich, Buddy Roemer, Ron Paul, Tim Pawlenty, and Rick Santorum will meet in South Carolina. This is the preliminary list of losers, so there is still time for more clowns to RSVP.</p><p>Politico and NBC postponed their <a ref="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/03/30/politico_debate_postponed">planned first debate of the campaign</a> because of the poor quality of candidates, but the South Carolina GOP is just going to allow Rick Santorum to be on national television in the year 2011.</p><p>Mitt Romney's not coming -- he does not have a formal exploratory committee yet. So the front-runner -- in many respects the sole serious candidate -- will not attend (because it would drag down his seriousness to be seen with the circus freaks, I guess). Michele Bachmann, the Palin stand-in with a shot at maybe winning a delegate or two, hasn't been confirmed, either.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/south_carolina_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/08/south_carolina_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>140</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP&#8217;s economy problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/john_boehner_shutdown_and_the_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/john_boehner_shutdown_and_the_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/04/07/john_boehner_shutdown_and_the_economy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the unemployment picture improves, voters may tire of Republican hardball tactics. Case in point: Glenn Beck]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2011/04/06/AFNEgnqC_story.html">a provocative theory</a> for why Glenn Beck and Fox are parting ways: The improving economy left Americans less receptive to Beck's non-stop apocalyptic gloom-and-doom patter.</p><blockquote> <p>When Beck's show made its debut on Fox News Channel in January 2009, the nation was in the throes of an economic collapse the likes of which had not been seen since the 1930s. Beck's angry broadcasts about the nation's imminent doom perfectly rode the wave of fear that had washed across the nation, and the relatively unknown entertainer suddenly had 3 million viewers a night...</p> <p>But as the recession began to ease, Beck's apocalyptic forecasts and ominous conspiracies became less persuasive, and his audience began to drift away. Beck responded with a doubling-down that ultimately brought about his demise on Fox.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/john_boehner_shutdown_and_the_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/john_boehner_shutdown_and_the_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan&#8217;s plan to erase the Great Society</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/paul_ryans_plan_to_dismantle_the_great_society/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/paul_ryans_plan_to_dismantle_the_great_society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan, R-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/04/06/paul_ryans_plan_to_dismantle_the_great_society</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dismantling it has been the right's goal for nearly five decades, and now they have a blueprint to achieve it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total budget mayhem! For budget geeks, Tuesday provided an overwhelming abundance of excuses for <a href="http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2011/04/choice-based-medicare-cost-controls.html">wonkery,</a> <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/04/medicare_reform">outrage</a> and <a href="%20http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/86270/the-achilles-heel-the-path-prosperity">pontification.</a> The prospect of an imminent government shutdown <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/05/government-shutdown-threat-deal-unreached_n_845014.html">appears more likely than ever,</a> and even if that scenario is avoided, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/801-economy/153995-geithner-reiterates-need-for-congress-to-raise-debt-ceiling">a collision with the debt ceiling</a> looms right around the corner. That should be enough for a normal week of political uproar. But just to make it all even loopier, here comes Paul Ryan, the Republican chairman of the House Budget Committee, with <a href="http://budget.house.gov/fy2012budget/">a radically ambitious plan to roll back the Great Society</a> and fundamentally transform how the United States takes care of its poor, sick and elderly.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/paul_ryans_plan_to_dismantle_the_great_society/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/06/paul_ryans_plan_to_dismantle_the_great_society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>255</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner&#8217;s policy director gave out Abramoff favor money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He greased the wheels for the symbol of GOP corruption, now he works for the leader of the new majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner is so obviously a favor-trading tool of monied interests -- this is the man, it must never be forgotten, who literally handed out tobacco company checks on the floor of the House -- that sometimes it hardly seems noteworthy when he again proves that he is nothing but a puppet of well-heeled lobbyists. But we must guard against cynicism and always take opportunities to remind the nation that Speaker Boehner is a corrupt tangerine.</p><p>So documentarian <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/corruption-watch-john-boehners-abramoff-connection/73396/">Alex Gibney writes today</a> of Boehner's recently hired policy director, Brett Loper. Before joining team Boehner, Loper was, naturally, a medical device lobbyist, whose job was to protect the profits of the medical device industry at the expense of, among other things, the federal deficit. And before that, he worked for the gloriously amoral Tom DeLay.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida GOP commandment: Thou shalt not say &#8220;uterus&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/florida_republicans_chastise_democrat_for_saying_uterus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/florida_republicans_chastise_democrat_for_saying_uterus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/03/31/florida_republicans_chastise_democrat_for_saying_uterus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Democrat connects a woman's womb to the Republican attack on unions, and gets admonished: No body parts, please!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been waiting in vain for a long time for the moment when reproductive female sex organs got mixed up with the national Republican assault on unions, but thanks to the reliable insanity of Florida, finally we have a story that has it all -- with a dash of the GOP's deregulatory agenda on top, just for spice. (Thanks to <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/paulrauber/status/53521241277071361">a tweet from Sierra Magazine's Paul Rauber,</a> for the tip.)</p><p>Last week, the Florida House of Representatives passed a bill <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/fl-bill-bans-automatic-union-dues-20110325,0,1209569.story">banning the automatic deduction of union dues</a> from government paychecks. During debate on the issue, state representative Scott Randolph, D-Orlando, <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/democrat-chastized-saying-uterus-house-floor">used his floor time,</a> reported the St. Petersberg Times, to make a point about how Republicans "are against regulations -- except when it comes to the little guys, or serves their specific interests."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/florida_republicans_chastise_democrat_for_saying_uterus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/florida_republicans_chastise_democrat_for_saying_uterus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Quayle knocks the hell out of fancy gala dinner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/ben_quayle_gala_dinner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/ben_quayle_gala_dinner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/31/ben_quayle_gala_dinner</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea Party leaders deliver bad jokes uncomfortably at annual meeting of everything they claim to hate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Quayle was elected to Congress to represent Arizona's third district <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/08/11/ben_quayle_dirty_ad">despite the fact that</a> he never voted in local elections, posed with children that weren't his in a mailer, released a series of remarkably creepy ads, has led a life of few accomplishments, is known solely for being the son of a national punchline, co-founded and contributed to a misogynistic website of frat humor and dirty pictures, and was alleged by his former "Dirty Scottsdale" colleague to have had some sort of <a href="http://thedirty.com/2010/08/ben-quayle-is-slamming-you-nik/">run-in with a "crazy hooker."</a> On the other hand, he promised to "knock the hell out of" Washington DC, if elected. And last night, this outsider dressed up in a tux to attend and tell jokes at the 67th annual Radio-TV Correspondents Dinner, one of those regular gala events where Washington's powerful pols mingle and party with the journalists who cover them. Just knocking away at those Beltway elites, that Ben Quayle.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/ben_quayle_gala_dinner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/ben_quayle_gala_dinner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocker: Tea Party Congress members take tons of farm subsidies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/welfare_tea_parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/welfare_tea_parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/31/welfare_tea_parties</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not even anti-government activists can wean themselves from Uncle Sam]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shocker: Anti-government activists are all welfare queens! But they accept the "wealthy white person" version of welfare, which is "farm subsidies." (The "wealthy white person" version of welfare is also lots of other subsidies and tax credits and government spending.)</p><p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tea-party-hypocrisy-lawmakers-tea-party-ties-government/story?id=13259014&amp;page=1">According to ABC,</a> "at least 23 current members of congress or their families have received government money for their farms." Some of them received a <em>lot</em> of money:</p><blockquote> <p>The biggest recipient was Rep. Stephen Fincher, a Republican from Frog Jump, Tenn.</p> <p>While the self-described Tea Party patriot lists his occupation as "farmer" and "gospel singer" in the Congressional Directory, he doesn't mention that his family has received more than $3 million in farm subsidies from 1995 to 2009, according to the Environmental Working Group.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/welfare_tea_parties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/welfare_tea_parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP war on labor moves to academia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/the_gop_war_on_labor_moves_to_academia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/the_gop_war_on_labor_moves_to_academia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/03/30/the_gop_war_on_labor_moves_to_academia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of merely whining about how the left has taken over the ivory tower, conservatives are taking action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In March 1949, a group of Illinois college students traveled to Springfield, Ill., to protest a group of anti-Communist subversion bills introduced by state Sen. Paul Broyles, the chairman of the Seditious Activities Intelligence Commission. Broyles wanted to outlaw the Communist Party, make membership in a Communist "front organization" a felony, and require all public-sector workers -- including public school teachers and university professors -- to swear loyalty oaths.</p><p>The protests drew wide attention and prompted the hasty passage of a joint resolution declaring that "It appears that these students are being indoctrinated with Communistic and other subversive theories contrary to our free systems of representative government." A public investigation of whether University of Chicago professors were responsible for such indoctrination followed, but mostly fizzled out after a bravura performance by University of Chicago chancellor Robert Hutchins.</p><p>Hutchins later <a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/2378553">reflected</a> on his experience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/the_gop_war_on_labor_moves_to_academia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/the_gop_war_on_labor_moves_to_academia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP suddenly discovers the Senate is broken</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/republicans_criticize_broken_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/republicans_criticize_broken_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/03/29/republicans_criticize_broken_senate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short memory hypocrisy alert: House Republicans complain about Senate delays on budget negotiations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government shutdown odds are spiking this morning, as <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703739204576229131946644972.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories">numerous</a> media outlets <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/with_time_short_congress_still_at_impasse_on_shutdown_talks/2011/03/28/AF76bErB_story.html">report</a> the outbreak of a plague of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/wonkbook_budget_negotiations_breaking_down/2011/03/10/AFVXKitB_blog.html?wprss=ezra-klein">partisan bickering.</a></p><p>The posturing is unseemly, but is also a sign that negotiations are getting serious -- there are no easy deals left. The wise thing to do would be to simply ignore the rancor, and wait for the end game. But I can't resist commenting on one broadside from the Republican camp.</p><p>     <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/news/reid_cr_talks_have_broken_down-204357-1.html">From Roll Call:</a>   </p><blockquote> <p>Boehner spokesman Michael Steel retorted that Democrats are desperately trying to divert attention from their own divisions and continue to back "essentially" status quo spending levels.</p> <p>"Discussions with Senate Democrats and the White House over a long-term funding bill are ongoing and will continue, but the facts remain the same. The House passed a bill to fund the government while cutting spending, and -- nearly 40 days later -- the Senate has not," Steel said.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/republicans_criticize_broken_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/republicans_criticize_broken_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin&#8217;s most dangerous professor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/wisconsins_most_dangerous_professor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/wisconsins_most_dangerous_professor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/03/25/wisconsins_most_dangerous_professor</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are Republicans desperate to see Bill Cronon's emails? Because ideas and history matter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought two books by the University of Wisconsin historian William Cronon: "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0013TJ008/ref=s9_bbs_co_d0_ir01?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=left-1&amp;pf_rd_r=0ASDSMWJB6NK40ZRVNR8&amp;pf_rd_t=3201&amp;pf_rd_p=1280661682&amp;pf_rd_i=typ01">Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England"</a> and "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Natures-Metropolis-Chicago-Great-West/dp/0393308731/ref=pd_sim_b_4">Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West.</a>"</p><p>A week ago, I had never heard of <a href="http://www.williamcronon.net/biography.htm">Cronon.</a> This is embarrassing, since it doesn't take much digging around to discover that he is one of the most highly regarded historians in the United States (not to mention president-elect of the American Historical Association).</p><p>But that was before Cronon's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/opinion/22cronon.html?src=twrhp">fascinating opinion piece</a> in Monday's New York Times detailing how Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's political agenda flies in the face of "civic traditions that for more than a century have been among the most celebrated achievements not just of their state, but of their own party as well." A devastating new broadside in the battle for Wisconsin, Cronon's Op-Ed deservedly went viral.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/wisconsins_most_dangerous_professor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/wisconsins_most_dangerous_professor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP declares hunger war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/24/the_gop_declares_hunger_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/24/the_gop_declares_hunger_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/03/24/the_gop_declares_hunger_war</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can it get any worse? A new bill would ban food stamp eligibility to families of striking workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what point does outright class warfare start to backfire for the Republican Party? The latest news out of Washington, courtesy of <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2011/03/23/buried-provision-food-stamps/">Zaid Jilani</a> at ThinkProgress, is simply stunning in its audacious cruelty: <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h1135/text">a provision in a bill introduced by five House Republicans</a> that would deny food stamps to any family in which a member of that family is on strike.</p><blockquote> <p>(3) STRIKING WORKERS INELIGIBLE- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no member of a family unit shall participate in the food stamp program at any time that any able-bodied work eligible adult member of such household is on strike as defined in the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C. 142(2)), because of a labor dispute (other than a lockout) as defined in section 2(9) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152(9)):</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/24/the_gop_declares_hunger_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/24/the_gop_declares_hunger_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red vs. blue: The great Midwestern backlash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/the_great_midwestern_political_seesaw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/the_great_midwestern_political_seesaw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/03/18/the_great_midwestern_political_seesaw</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New GOP governors in Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan are suddenly unpopular. The economy gives, and it takes away]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2008, Barack Obama carried Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio, three crucial Midwestern states in which he had campaigned unceasingly. Two years later, the midterm tidal wave handed monolithic control of the state legislature and governor's mansion in each state over to Republicans. The new governors, Wisconsin's Scott Walker, Ohio's John Kasich and Michigan's Rick Snyder, immediately and forcefully moved to exploit their power in pursuit of bold Republican agendas.</p><p>We're not just talking good old-fashioned budget-balancing mandated cuts in public services. The grandiose ambitions of Wisconsin's Walker have been well chronicled. But Michigan's Rick Snyder has been equally aggressive. Snyder is proposing to <a href="http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20110316/C03/303169995/snyder-tax-break-for-business-60-exclusive-to-crains-subscribers#">cut corporate taxes</a> in Michigan by 60 percent while simultaneously hiking the percentage of state revenues raised from individual income taxes from 31 percent to 41 percent. He just signed a "financial emergency law" giving him the right to appoint emergency managers -- with the legal power to arbitrarily cancel union contracts -- to replace locally elected government authorities. In Ohio, Kasich plans to gut public education spending, end collective bargaining by public sector workers, sell prisons to the private sector and push through a voucher plan for charter schools.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/the_great_midwestern_political_seesaw/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/18/the_great_midwestern_political_seesaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
