<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > The Washington Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_washington_times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Coverup at Washington Times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors knew there was an apparent plagiarist on staff but let him keep writing. An exclusive look inside the paper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his long career, Arnaud de Borchgrave, a one-time Newsweek correspondent and editor, has earned his share of laurels. Fellow journalist Theodore H. White has called him one of “America's great foreign correspondents.” “In a job that requires bluff and bravado, he has outrun the best of them," Esquire gushed in a lengthy profile, which is quoted in de Borchgrave’s official bio. Along the way, he has also racked up some fancy titles, including director of the transnational threats project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.</p><p>These days, though, de Borchgrave is involved in some less praiseworthy pursuits. Alongside his other activities, the veteran newsman is a columnist for the Washington Times, the influential conservative broadsheet, where he once served as editor in chief. And in a handful of columns over the last year he has lifted passages verbatim, or nearly verbatim, from the Internet and other sources, without attribution — a fact the Washington Times' leadership tried to sweep under the rug, according to insiders at the paper.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Drudge&#8217;s rescue mission</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/matt_drudges_rescue_mission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/matt_drudges_rescue_mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12909857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative mogul has been pumping traffic to the Washington Times -- where two of his editors write columns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D.C.’s conservative newspaper, the Washington Times, has long been mocked for its crazy owner, the Rev. Sun Myung Moon. When he isn't busy performing <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-10-14/news/17936748_1_mass-wedding-unification-church-50th-wedding-anniversary">mass weddings</a>, the billionaire Moon has been underwriting the money-losing paper -- which, at a high point, once earned the personal praise of Ronald Reagan. Recently, however, the Times has struggled, not just because of the usual industry woes, but also because of infighting among the 92-year-old Moon’s heirs. Thankfully, the Times has had a helping hand from another famous right-wing eccentric: Matt Drudge.</p><p>For the past year, Drudge has provided the Washington Times with, on average, 46 percent of its monthly traffic. In November of 2011, the Drudge Report sent 4.7 million visitors to the Washington Times website, or 57 percent of all the Times’ traffic that month. By comparison, just 820,000 visitors actually accessed the Times through its homepage that November. (These numbers come from the Times’ internal Google Analytics statistics, which Salon obtained.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/matt_drudges_rescue_mission/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/matt_drudges_rescue_mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baseless Condi Rice speculation making a comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoleezza Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10658321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: To celebrate its return, a brief history of this variety of pundit fantasy writing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>[UPDATED BELOW]</b> Joseph Curl, former White House correspondent for the Washington Times, <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/18/curl-one-president-please-with-a-side-of-rice/?page=all#pagebreak">is bringing me back to the good old days of 2006</a> in his latest opinion column for the conservative paper. It's a breathless report that Condoleezza Rice will seek the vice presidency, and it's a classic of the genre.</p><p>Any amateur can speculate that Chris Christie will enter the presidential race, or posit a Mike Bloomberg third-party run, or imagine Hillary Clinton launching a primary challenge against Barack Obama. After all, those three have actually won elections and expressed political ambitions. It takes a real pro to decide to build buzz around someone who not only hasn't ever run for anything, but who's never expressed a desire to run for anything.</p><p>Rice, the national security advisor in George W. Bush's first presidential term and secretary of state in his second, is currently a professor at Stanford with the requisite right-wing think tank fellowship. She has not said or done anything "political" in years. But Curl has been hearing things!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday link dump: Scientologist massages for prisoners?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/wednesday_link_dump_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/wednesday_link_dump_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Haggard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/02/wednesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perks for cons, the deal with the flotilla, getting fired from the Moonie Times, and Ted Haggard's new church]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>The best part of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhYCYI00rD4&amp;feature=channel">this Sue Lowden ad against Nevada's Tea Party Senate candidate Sharron Angle</a> is the picture of Tom Cruise at 20 seconds in.</li>
<li>Joe Biden <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0610/Biden_solidifies_defense_of_Israel_Whats_the_big_deal_here.html?showall">gave a depressing statement on the Israeli flotilla raid.</a></li>
<li>Contrary to her own statement, <a href="http://wonkette.com/415759/jan-brewers-dad-did-not-die-fighting-the-nazis-no-matter-what-she-says">Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer's dad</a> did not die fighting the Nazi regime in Germany. Unless "the Nazi regime in Germany" is her name for "lung cancer."</li>
<li>The sad Washington Times <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/story-lab/2010/06/exactly_one_month_ago_julia.html">fired longtime reporter Julia Duin</a> for telling the Washington Post about the snake in the Times newsroom.</li>
<li>The Vanity Fair profile of Sally Quinn is, indeed, <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/07/sally-quinn-201007?currentPage=1">hilarious.</a></li>
<li>PACs are <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/01/AR2010060103887.html">pretty much just slush funds.</a></li>
<li>The readers of The Corner <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGE1MGU1MGFjZTgyZGE4NzAxNGZmMDM4ZDI3MjZhN2M=">can't really decide</a> if they find professional wrestling morally repulsive or if they love it because a Republican is in charge of it.</li>
<li>Is Newsmax going to buy Newsweek? Probably not, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100602/bs_ynews/ynews_bs2368">but it would be pretty funny.</a></li>
<li>Disgraced gay sex-having drug-using pastor Ted Haggard <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/06/getting-warmer/57598/">has a new church,</a> and gay people are welcome!</li>
<li>
      <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/02/alabamas-defeated-gun-tot_n_598370.html">This is a heartbreaking video tribute to Alamaba's fallen heroes.</a>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/wednesday_link_dump_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/wednesday_link_dump_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, those wacky Birthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/birther_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/birther_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/11/30/birther_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Times runs an ad that relies on some eccentric legal theorizing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Birthers may be shut out of most media outlets -- it's a conspiracy! -- but the Washington Times is apparently still happy to take their money, even if it means running erroneous advertisements that barely even flirt with the borders of reality. Monday's Times, for instance, featured a Birther ad (an image of it accompanies this post) that declares President Obama ineligible for his job not because of where he was born, but to whom.</p><p>The ad depicts three monkeys ignoring what some Birthers believe are the facts of the situation; Congress is seeing no evil, the courts are hearing none, and the media is speaking none. It declares "Obama is <u>NOT</u> an Article II&#160;Natural Born Citizen and therefore is <u>NOT</u> Eligible to be President," and asks for plaintiffs to join in lawsuits spearheaded by the people who took out the ad.</p><p>The problem? Beyond the fact that "Article II&#160;Natural Born Citizen" appears to be a term made up out of thin air, those responsible for the ad don't have a leg to stand on, legally. First off, they can get as many plaintiffs as they want; they still won't be able to show standing -- a particularized injury, basically -- and that means the suit will get tossed, and fast. Second, the Birthers have just decided that their interpretation of what the Founding Fathers meant when they said in the Constitution the president had to be a natural born citizen is the correct one, courts be damned. And they're wrong.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/birther_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/birther_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Times misleads on healthcare, illegal immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/healthcare_immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/healthcare_immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/28/healthcare_immigrants</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new myth about one of the right's favorite talking points on healthcare reform comes to life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue of whether or not illegal immigrants <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/10/wilson_immigrants/index.html?source=refresh">would be covered</a> under Democrats' healthcare reform proposals has been, to put it mildly, <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/09/koppelman_two/">a hot-button one.</a> The fact that many conservatives, including congressional Republicans, mistakenly believe that illegal immigrants would, in fact, get coverage from the government hasn't helped matters. Even the White House's post-Joe Wilson policy shift, an <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/09/12/white_house_stiffens_against_illegal_immigrants/">announcement</a> that the administration doesn't want undocumented immigrants allowed to purchase insurance through a planned exchange, didn't seem to have much effect.</p><p>The Washington Times added some fuel to the fire Monday with an <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/28/liberals-seek-health-care-access-for-illegals/">article</a> headlined "Liberals seek health-care acess for illegals." Unfortunately, the paper doesn't have the best record of prizing accuracy over politics, especially not when it comes to issues of immigration, and this article continued that tradition.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/healthcare_immigrants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/healthcare_immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear blog commenters: Why do you hate America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/30/breitbart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/30/breitbart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/03/30/breitbart</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Washington Times, Andrew Breitbart says liberals are mounting a Soviet-style disinformation campaign -- in the comment sections of conservative blogs. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Breitbart, an increasingly high-profile conservative commentator best known for his time as an editor at the Drudge Report, has identified the single greatest threat to our republic:&#160;Blog commenters or, more specifically, liberals who "invade"&#160;the comments sections at right-wing blogs in order to "ensure that President Obama is not subject to the same coordinated, facts-be-damned, multimedia takedown they employed over eight long years to destroy the presidency -- and the humanity -- of George W. Bush."</p><p>Breitbart advanced this thesis in an <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/30/rules-for-conservative-radicals/">Op-Ed</a> for the Washington Times. The piece is amusing enough to be worthy of reading in full, but here are some of the choicer bits:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/03/30/breitbart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/30/breitbart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The War on Christmas continues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/war_xmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/war_xmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/23/war_xmas</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Washington Times editor admits "retailers' sales brochures have been bedecked with Christmas iconography" but still finds reason to complain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it's just me, especially since I&#160;don't watch Bill O'Reilly anymore (the show got boring a couple years back) but I feel like we're not hearing as much about the evil liberal War on Christmas this year. And that's too bad, because -- as you all surely know -- there really is a dastardly liberal plot to undermine Christmas. As I&#160;understand it, this plan will culminate in the successful presidential campaign of a Democrat named Barack Hussein Obama.</p><p>Fortunately, the Washington Times' Peter J. Parisi is <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/23/why-do-retailers-fear-using-the-word-christmas/">on the case.</a> Though he admits that "retailers' sales brochures have been bedecked with Christmas iconography," he still finds plenty of reason to worry about the desecration of the holiday:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/war_xmas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/war_xmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Times updates style guide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/27/washington_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/27/washington_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/02/26/washington_times</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a new editor, the paper -- a conservative stalwart -- has made a shift toward using some more neutral terminology, and some on the right aren't happy. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Washington Times, the conservative newspaper founded and run by the Rev. Sun Myung Moon, changed its top leadership recently, observers expected that more change would be coming. They weren't wrong -- with the replacement of executive editor Wes Pruden by John Solomon, who has extensive experience at more mainstream media outlets, we've already seen one small but meaningful change to the paper's coverage. The Times has altered several elements of its style guide, telling staffers to use more neutral terminology instead of the doctrinaire wording and scare quotes favored by the previous editorial regime. In an e-mail memo that has been widely circulated now, one editor wrote:<br />
<blockquote>All: </p><p>Here are some recent updates to TWT style. </p><p>1) Clinton will be the headline word for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. </p><p>2) Gay is approved for copy and preferred over homosexual, except in clinical references or references to sexual activity. </p><p>3) The quotation marks will come off gay marriage (preferred over homosexual marriage). </p><p>4) Moderate is approved, but centrist is still allowed. </p><p>5) We will use illegal immigrants, not illegal aliens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/02/27/washington_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/27/washington_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The liberals are speaking, the liberals are speaking!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/01/commencement_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/01/commencement_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2007/06/01/commencement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative group complains about leftist bias in college commencement speakers, but its methodology could use a little work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where, oh, where won't those insidious leftists strike next? </p><p>The <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/drudge_report/">Drudge Report</a> and the conservative <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070531-115046-2578r.htm">Washington Times</a> are both highlighting a new <a href="http://media.yaf.org/blog/?p=54">study</a> from the conservative Young America's Foundation, which purports to show that, in the words of spokesman Jason Mattera, "college administrators are using commencement ceremonies to send their students off with one more predictable leftist lecture." And while it does appear to be true that more liberals spoke at commencement this year than conservatives, just a cursory look at YAF's study shows that the disparity is nowhere near as wide as the group pretends. </p><p>YAF lists 49 speakers as being a "liberal activist, Democratic Party official, and/or representative of the old, liberal media," compared with just eight who are a "Republican Party official, conservative activist, and/or representative of the new media." (Some of the people on the list are speaking twice this year, and are for the most part counted as such.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/06/01/commencement_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/01/commencement_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The president as hurricane victim</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/06/washtimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/06/washtimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/09/06/washtimes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another blast of insensitivity from the right, the Washington Times goes off on the "vultures of the venomous left."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The president may finally be finding something close to the right tone to strike on Katrina -- he has started referring to the storm's victims as <a target= "new" href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/12572851.htm">Americans</a> rather than as "folks" from "this part of the world" -- but that doesn't mean that his supporters and apologists are. </p><p>We told you earlier today about the "Let them eat cake" insensitivity of <a href="/politics/war_room/2005/09/05/barbara/index.html">the president's mother</a> and the high-fiving that's apparently going on along the <a href="/politics/war_room/2005/09/06/columbia/index.html">antiabortion, hard-right fringe.</a> Now comes a hot blast of nastiness from the editor in chief of the Washington Times -- a paper that was just a few days ago <a href="/politics/war_room/2005/09/02/bushtour1/index.html">wondering what happened</a> to the stand-up, take-charge guy who led the nation after 9/11. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/09/06/washtimes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/06/washtimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Troubled Times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/19/nytimes_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/19/nytimes_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/12/18/nytimes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missteps by Howell Raines, the New York Times' imperious top editor, have left the nation's best newspaper vulnerable to attacks by the right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A century ago, New Yorkers saw advertisements around town for the New York Times that played up the emerging paper's respectability: "It won't soil the breakfast cloth." Today it's the Times' own dirty laundry that's being scrubbed in public -- and the newspaper's political opponents couldn't be happier. </p><p>The mighty daily is struggling to regain its footing in the wake of the paper's most embarrassing newsroom flap since it famously outed the woman who accused William Kennedy Smith of rape more than a decade ago. This time, the controversy erupted when two Times sports columnists questioned the newspaper's editorial campaign against the men-only membership policy at the venerable Augusta National Golf Course in Georgia. Both columns were spiked by executive editor Howell Raines. </p><p>The decision outraged journalists and media critics. While it's rare for columnists to contradict the editorial policy of their paper, it's almost unheard of at major newspapers to spike a columnist's work for internal political reasons. The fiasco played right into the hands of conservative critics who in recent months launched fresh attacks against the Times for its alleged liberal bias, arguing the left-wing fights of the editorial page were permeating the news sections. The bigger worry, say some media analysts, is that the poor judgment on one story is being used to discredit the Times' critical work on life-and-death issues like the Iraq War, where the paper's coverage has international influence. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/19/nytimes_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/19/nytimes_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little boy&#039;s night on the town</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/10/soundbite_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/10/soundbite_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2000 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/05/10/soundbite</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Georgetown society dinner for the Cuban refugee raises eyebrows -- and thickly mascaraed lashes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young Elian Gonzalez, it seems, has become a hot commodity on Washington's society dinner circuit. This weekend, he and his pop, Juan Miguel Gonzalez, were ferried from the Wye Plantation in Maryland  (where they have been living as virtual recluses since the boy was reunited with his father) to the Georgetown home of R.J. Reynolds tobacco heirs Smith and Elizabeth Bagley.</p><p>The dinner drew the expected cynical criticism that the boy was being paraded around for prospective Democratic donors, but the nastiest comments came from an apparently envious Georgetown maven, who seemed surprised that the Bagleys would entertain guests of such lesser means -- like, say, working-class communists from Cuba.</p><p>"This is really astonishing," the unnamed source <a target="new" href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/default-20005923247.htm">told the Washington Times.</a> "After all the talk about how Elian was put on exhibit in Miami, the Bagleys were a party to this. They don't usually invite their chauffeur or his children to dinner."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/10/soundbite_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/10/soundbite_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A double standard?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/rape_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/rape_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/log/1999/10/29/rape</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two gays allegedly raped and murdered a young boy. Why didn&#039;t it get covered as much as the Matthew Shepard case?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he rape and murder of an Arkansas teenager last month has become Topic A among some right-wing media-bashers. Jesse Dirkhising, 13, was allegedly raped and suffocated -- gagged with his own underwear -- by a 22-year-old man while another man, described by police as his "lover," looked on. The Associated Press picked the story up on its local and state wires and has followed up on it since, though none of the reports went national. Which is precisely what the right finds suspicious.</p><p>In an Oct. 22 story ("Media tune out torture death of Arkansas boy"), the <a href="http://www.washtimes.com/">Washington Times</a> contrasted this lack of coverage with the treatment the murder of Matthew Shepard received. The AP carried stories relating to his death on its national wire, and news of the trial is being handled the same way. What these two stories have to do with each other is something only the Washington Times could discern. For clarification, the Moonie paper turned to Tim Graham, the director of media studies at the <a href="http://www.mediaresearch.org/">Media Research Center,</a> a conservative media watchdog organization.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/rape_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/29/rape_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#039;m not peaking too early&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/04/gore_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/04/gore_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/08/04/gore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Gore takes on his critics and the substance-averse media, who&#039;ve savaged the vice president for all the wrong things.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>l Gore knows he's been getting some mighty bad press lately, that even staunch Democrats have embraced the media caricature of him as a "stiff" and "boring" automaton from the Disneyland Hall of Vice Presidents.  He's trying mightily to shrug it off.</p><p>"I find the <i>coverage</i> stiff and boring," he told Salon News.  Not that the veep is complaining. "I feel fine about it," he insists, though his calm seems more calculating political strategy than thick skin. "I would honestly not swap my position in this race for anyone else's; I'm not peaking too early," he adds, only half-kidding. "You know, in stock car races, it's usually the second car in the gun lap that wins."</p><p>Gore is referring to his current weak position in the polls compared with his likely opponent in the 2000 election, high-flying Texas Gov. George W. Bush. Gore hopes Bush has only one direction to go in the polls <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/04/09/bush/index.html">and that direction is down.</a></p><p>Thus, the vice president can insist that he's quite content, for now, being the Rodney Dangerfield of American politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/08/04/gore_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/04/gore_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The smearing of Judge Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/04/22/news_24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/04/22/news_24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1998 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/04/22/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How newspaper articles of questionable origin were used by Kenneth Starr to remove a federal jurist in a Whitewater case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">O</font>peratives of the anti-Clinton Arkansas Project mounted a campaign in the summer of 1995 to discredit a federal judge because they did not want him to preside over a criminal prosecution brought  by the Whitewater independent counsel, documents obtained by Salon indicate.</p><p>Months after the campaign was launched, independent  counsel Kenneth Starr prevailed in a highly unusual motion to  remove the jurist, U.S. District Judge Henry Woods, from a case involving then-Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker, a move that was questioned at the time by legal scholars.</p><p>"I can tell you that when the court recused Judge Woods, it  raised a lot of eyebrows among legal ethicists," said Stephen Gillers, a professor of legal ethics at New York University Law School, who labeled the court's decision "unjustified and a wild stretch." "I really can't think of an incident in the recent past, by which I mean the last 20 years, in which there has been a formal motion by the government to  recuse a district judge in a criminal case," Gillers said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/04/22/news_24/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/04/22/news_24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man behind the mask</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/04/07/news_16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/04/07/news_16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1998 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/04/07/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A profile of billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, who has been underwriting various efforts to discredit President Clinton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">R</font>ichard Mellon Scaife's eyes are what you notice first: a startling sky blue, they look almost unreal, so intense is their color. For the rest, a handsome countenance, a large frame and a shock of once-blond hair, now white, make up a classic picture of good breeding. Scaife's father came from one of Pittsburgh's blue blood families, its ancestry traced back to medieval England; his mother was a fabulously wealthy Mellon descendant whom Fortune magazine identified in 1957 as one of the eight richest people in America.</p><p>And yet, there is about Richard Mellon Scaife a seeming unease with his own person that even friends have commented on through the years. Almost pathologically shy -- he removed his name from Who's Who more than 15 years ago and has since sat for only a handful of interviews -- he is, at the same time, given to a pattern of unpredictable behavior that has continued despite his having stopped his formerly heavy drinking.</p><p>"He has a love-hate relationship with a lot of people, including himself," said a former close acquaintance. "He is at once the most wonderful, generous guy and the most hateful and vindictive one." Added another person who has observed Scaife close-up in Pittsburgh, "Whenever he dislikes someone, it's not enough to fire them; they can never work in this town again."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/04/07/news_16/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/04/07/news_16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsreal: The great Arlington National Cemetery smear</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/12/03/news_137/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/12/03/news_137/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1997 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1997/12/03/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to screwing President Clinton, nothing is sacred, not even the dead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#000000"><b>The</b></font> family and some relatives had just sat down to Thanksgiving dinner when my cousin, Jim, an Air Force veteran, leaned earnestly across the table. "So," he said, "first Clinton sold overnights in the Lincoln bedroom to big party donors. Now I understand he's selling burial plots at Arlington National Cemetery. Tell me, is nothing sacred in this administration anymore?"</p><p>As a Washington reporter, I'm often called upon by family and friends back home to explain goings-on inside the Beltway. This one should have been easy. The Arlington accusation had been proven false, I replied. End of story. Or so I thought.</p><p>"Right," Jim scoffed, "then how come it's still all over the radio?"</p><p>How indeed? Inside the Beltway, the Arlington cemetery story had been discredited as a lame attempt at partisan political poisoning. Here in Connecticut -- and it seems elsewhere -- the poison is still potent. How this particular phony scandal grew such sturdy legs is a grim but instructive tale of how presidential character assassination is as alive and kicking now as when President Clinton first entered the White House five years ago.</p><p>First, the smear:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/12/03/news_137/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/12/03/news_137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsreal: Paula Jones&#039;s sleaze finder</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/13/news_69/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/13/news_69/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1997 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1997/11/13/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest member of the Paula Jones legal team is a private detective whose job is to run down the sleaziest recycled rumors about the president&#039;s alleged sexual escapades in Arkansas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#000000">If</font> the Paula Jones sexual misconduct suit against President Clinton wasn't already unseemly enough, things are about to get a whole lot seamier: Tom Grant, P.I., is on the case.</p><p>Grant, whose clients have included actress/singer Courtney Love, has been hired by Ms. Jones' lawyers to dig up dirt on the president's sexual past. Given his track record, who knows what the Beverly Hills private eye may find? Love hired him three years ago to locate her missing husband, Kurt Cobain. The heroin-addicted leader of the rock group, Nirvana, eventually turned up dead, a suicide, Seattle police ruled. Grant, however, believes that Cobain was murdered, and on his <a target="_new" href="http://www.tomgrantpi.com/">Web site</a> he names Love as the prime suspect. For $18, Grant will also send you his 150-page file entitled "Kurt Cobain -- suicide or murder? You decide."</p><p>Contacted by Salon in Little Rock, where he's been busy digging for the past two weeks, the 50-year-old former Los Angeles police detective would not reveal what he had uncovered so far, but he insisted that his investigation had been "very productive." Warned Grant: "If Mr. Clinton's lawyers want to play hardball with Paula Jones, that's just fine. We've got the stuff to play hardball too."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/11/13/news_69/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/13/news_69/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

