The Year in Sanity

The Year in Sanity: Jim Joyce

His blown call cost Armando Galarraga a perfect game. But from the moment he realized his mistake, he was golden

  • more
    • All Share Services

The Year in Sanity: Jim Joyce** CORRECTS PERFECT GAME TO WEDNESDAY, NOT TUESDAY ** Home plate umpire Jim Joyce calls a strike during the first inning of a baseball game between the Detroit Tigers and Cleveland Indians in Detroit Thursday, June 3, 2010. Tigers pitcher Armando Galarraga lost his bid for a perfect game with two outs in the ninth inning on a disputed call at first base by Joyce on Wednesday night. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)(Credit: Paul Sancya)

Armando Galarraga was a journeyman Detroit Tigers right-hander who shocked the baseball world on June 2 by throwing a perfect game against the Cleveland Indians. Except, of course, the game wasn’t perfect, because with two outs in the ninth inning umpire Jim Joyce called Jason Donald of the Indians safe at first base when Donald clearly should have been called out to end the game.

Galarraga responded with a you’ve got to be kidding me smile for the ages, then retired one more batter for a one-hit shutout. He later said he hadn’t argued because he was in shock.

But it was Joyce’s response that turned this terrible tale into one that’s almost heart-warming. Not as heart-warming as a journeyman pitcher tossing a perfect game, mind you, but pretty toasty.

Having asked to see the video replay after the game, an emotional Joyce spoke to reporters: “It was the biggest call of my career and I kicked it. I just cost that kid a perfect game,” he said. “I missed it from here to that wall. I had a great angle, and I missed the call.” He also asked to speak to Galarraga, apologized to him and hugged him. Offered the next day off by his superiors, Joyce declined, saying he was ready to face what he assumed would be a hostile reaction from the Detroit crowd.

This eminently reasonable, grown-up reaction stood out because baseball umpires are ordinarily cloistered. They have what amounts to lifetime tenure. They don’t face reporters, rarely admit mistakes publicly and are not held accountable for their actions in any way that’s visible to the players or public. Don’t like that call? Replays showed the ump got it wrong? Tough.

Galarraga said he’d forgiven the umpire, and Joyce’s response to his error has been widely praised beyond baseball. He’s become a go-to example of how to handle mistakes in politics, religion and — especially because his straight-forward behavior came in the midst of BP’s oil-spill debaclebusiness.

Less than two weeks after the blown call, ESPN surveyed major league players for their opinions about umpires. Their overwhelming choice as the best in the business: Jim Joyce.

King Kaufman is a senior writer for Salon. You can e-mail him at king at salon dot com. Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr

The Year in Sanity: Constance McMillen

When her high school tried to exclude her and her girlfriend from prom, the teen kept a cool head -- and won big

  • more
    • All Share Services

The Year in Sanity: Constance McMillenFILE - Constance McMillen, an 18-year-old senior at Itawamba County Agricultural High School, is seen in a Monday, March 22, 2010 photo as she leaves the federal courthouse in Aberdeen, Miss. A federal judge ruled Tuesday that a Mississippi school district violated McMillen's rights by refusing to allow her to bring her girlfriend to the prom, but he said he would not force the school to hold the event.(AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis, File)(Credit: Rogelio V. Solis)

Teenagers have endless reasons to be crazy — the stress of school, the rush of hormones, Justin Bieber’s haircut. So just imagine being Constance McMillen. Last winter, the gay 18-year-old was told by officials at her school, Mississippi’s Atawamba Agricultural High School, that she couldn’t bring her girlfriend to her senior prom. From that low point, things just got worse. After McMillen circulated a petition to protest the decision, the school board canceled the prom altogether, turning her into a target of peer scorn and her cause into a national story.

In the weeks that followed, as the ACLU slapped her school board with a lawsuit and McMillen began speaking to the media, she proved to be a preternaturally mature teen who had unwavering convictions and a mesmerizing self-assurance. “I’m not going to go to prom and pretend like I’m not gay,” she said matter-of-factly to Ellen Degeneres. “Otherwise there’s no point in me going.” Throughout the ordeal, McMillen was charming, sincere — and impressively sane.

In the end, her prom may not have had an entire happy ending — in a twist straight out of a lame teen comedy, the school ended up staging a “secret” prom to which she wasn’t invited. But she still came out a winner. The “Ellen” show awarded her a $30,000 scholarship, she appeared at the GLAAD Awards, and even rode as a grand marshal in the NYC Pride parade. Constance McMillen may not have had the senior year of her dreams, but she got something much better: a well-financed education, the recognition of millions of people across the country and self-respect. And she reminded the rest of us that when it comes to facing down bigotry, there’s no better weapon than a cool head.

Continue Reading Close
Thomas Rogers

Thomas Rogers is Salon's Arts Editor.

The Year in Sanity: Jimmy Kimmel

During this year's late-night war, the funnyman's conversation with Leno became a rare moment of clarity

  • more
    • All Share Services

The Year in Sanity: Jimmy KimmelTalk show host Jimmy Kimmel arrives as a guest at the premiere of the new comedy film "Funny People" in Hollywood July 20, 2009. REUTERS/Fred Prouser (UNITED STATES ENTERTAINMENT HEADSHOT)(Credit: © Fred Prouser / Reuters)

Deep in the national nightmare of the notorious late-night wars of 2010, you couldn’t wake up in the morning without a fresh dissection of what scathing remarks Conan O’Brien had pulled off, what digs Jay Leno had gotten in, and what satisfied glee David Letterman had vented the night before. Yet despite all the gags, the whole spectacle sometimes felt as terrible and exhausting as a dysfunctional family gathering — replete with emotional baggage and hurt feelings. So it came as a welcome surprise when Jimmy Kimmel, the low-key dude who made his name with “The Man Show,” emerged as the voice of clarity in the midst of the debacle.

Like everybody, he’d made a few jokes about the bloodbath. He’d even brazenly done an opening bit in Leno drag, big chin and all. But on January 14, he went above and beyond. Appearing via satellite on the “10 at 10″ segment on Leno’s own show, Kimmel defiantly, genially ripped the guy a new one. “I have a lot of questions to ask you about this whole thing,” he said cheerily, speaking for everybody at home. And it was more than just crazy chutzpah to then go on to tell Jay Leno — and his audience — that the best prank he ever pulled was that “I told a guy that, five years from now, I’m gonna give you my show. And then when the five years came, I gave it to him, and then I took it back almost instantly.” It was utterly sane.

Kimmel’s “10 at 10″ appearance had none of the usual easy smarm that comes from simply making a crack in a monologue. “This show’s canceled, right? Nobody’s watching this show,” he quipped, right to Leno’s face. Oh, but we did watch. How could we not, as Kimmel pleaded, “Conan and I have children. All you have to take care of is cars. We have lives to lead here. For God’s sake, leave our shows alone!” It was direct, it was pointed, it was brave, and most of all, it was funny as hell. And when the dust cleared, it turned out Kimmel was the guy who best demonstrated that he understands his job as an entertainer is to entertain us. Entertain he did, with a degree of wit and honesty that would ultimately prove the most graceful moment in one of television’s ugliest spats.

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

The Year in Sanity: Michael Bloomberg

With no clear political points to gain, the New York Mayor did the right thing on the "ground zero mosque"

  • more
    • All Share Services

The Year in Sanity: Michael BloombergNew York Mayor Michael Bloomberg testifies on Capitol Hill Washington, Thursday, Sept. 30, 2010, before the House Immigration, Citizenship, Refugee, Border Security, and International Law subcommittee hearing on the role of immigration in strengthening America's economy. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)(Credit: Cliff Owen)

The planned “ground zero mosque,” as you’ve surely heard, is not really a mosque — it’s a full-service community center that will feature a gym, library, swimming pool, basketball court, auditorium for community events and, yes, a Muslim prayer space — and it’s not at ground zero. It should be no more controversial than the 92nd Street Y, a venerable Upper East Side community center that also houses an area for Jewish services.

But as it dominated the media this summer, almost no major political leader wanted to point any of this out. Islamophobia in America has blossomed in 2010, with polls showing an alarming share of the population giving in to fear and suspicion of Muslims.

In this climate, President Obama would only acknowledge the right of organizers to build their community center near ground zero; he went out of his way not to “comment on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there.” Chuck Schumer, the New York senator with a magnetic attraction to television cameras, clammed up, communicating only vague sentiments through a spokesman. Anthony Weiner, the House firebrand who’s been hailed by many progressives as a model for political courage, spent the summer inventing new and ever-more clever ways to duck the issue. And on and on.

Which is what made New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Aug. 3 speech on the subject so refreshing — and so important. With the Statue of Liberty behind him, Bloomberg went farther than any other major American leader in defending the project, daring to remind listeners that Muslims shared in the pain of 9/11 and linking the construction of the center to our country’s highest ideals. He didn’t just say it could be built; he insisted that it should be built.

“Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11, and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans,” Bloomberg said. “We would betray our values and play into our enemies’ hands if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists, and we should not stand for that.”

He added: “The attack was an act of war, and our first responders defended not only our city, but our country and our Constitution. We do not honor their lives by denying the very constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor their lives by defending those rights and the freedoms that the terrorists attacked.

It’s hard to find any political advantage in Bloomberg’s move. Nationally, polls showed that nearly three-quarters of Americans opposed the project. Within New York City, more than 60 percent did. He would have paid no price by staying silent or joining the pile-on; in fact, he might have helped his poll numbers by doing so. Instead, he staked out an uncommonly rational and principled position and stuck with it unapologetically — showing more leadership than the president of the United States. (It was almost enough to make us forget about that whole term limits thing … )

Continue Reading Close
Steve Kornacki

Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki

The Year in Sanity: Peter Beinart

A liberal hawk sees the light on Israel

  • more
    • All Share Services

The Year in Sanity: Peter BeinartPeter Beinart

Until this summer, journalist Peter Beinart was best known as a prominent liberal hawk, the man who accused Iraq war critics of “abject pacifism,” and the editor who used the New Republic to vocally advocate for the invasion of Iraq. Then, in May, with the publication of an essay on Zionism that has become as influential as it was unexpected, Beinart transformed himself into an important critic of U.S. policy — and American Jewish sentiment — toward Israel.

Beinart, who attends an Orthodox synagogue, called his New York Review of Books piece, “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment,” “the hardest thing I ever wrote.”

In it he takes aim at groups like the Anti-Defamation League and AIPAC “for scolding people who contradict their vision of Israel as a state in which all leaders cherish democracy and yearn for peace” — when that vision clearly does not match reality. ”Morally, American Zionism is in a downward spiral,” he wrote, citing the opposition of American Jewish institutions to “a Zionism that challenges Israel’s behavior in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and toward its own Arab citizens.”

Beinart’s essay met intense hostility from his former allies on the foreign policy right. But he has followed the New York Review essay with a series of columns for the Daily Beast zeroing in on, among other things, Israel’s Gaza embargo, the ADL’s hypocrisy, and the disingenuousness of Benjamin Netanyahu.

Continue Reading Close
Justin Elliott

Justin Elliott is a reporter for ProPublica. You can follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin

Page 3 of 3 in The Year in Sanity