<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tim burton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tim_burton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Hollywood guts children&#8217;s classics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/gullivers_travels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/gullivers_travels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulliver's Travels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/12/29/gullivers_travels</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Gulliver's Travels" is just the latest movie to eviscerate its source material. Tim Burton, we're looking at you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A staple of freshman English classes and a classic of Juvenalian satire, Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" has been pored over for centuries -- and yet, so far as I can determine, no one in all that time has suggested that Swift's essay would be improved by the addition of robots.</p><p>But that's exactly what Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" gains in its most recent movie version, which stars Jack Black as a loudmouth underachiever who works in the mail room of a New York newspaper. Black's Gulliver -- everyone calls him by his surname, owing perhaps to the fact that his first name is Lemuel -- doesn't have much in the way of ambition, but he is nursing a fierce crush on one of the paper's editors (Amanda Peet). He finally works up the courage to ask her on a date, but chickens out at the last second, and in order to explain his presence in her office, he awkwardly puts in for a travel-writing assignment (get it?).</p><p>So far, so nothing like Jonathan Swift. Gulliver does eventually make his way to the kingdom of Lilliput, whose diminutive residents are permanently at war with nearby Blefuscu, and makes himself useful by singlehandedly dispatching the Blefuscunian navy. But that's about all that remains of Swift's 1729 novel. Well, that and a scene in which Gulliver extinguishes a fire raging through the Lilliputian king's castle by voiding his bladder on the royal residence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/gullivers_travels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/gullivers_travels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Alice&#8221; still reigns at box office with $34.5M</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/22/us_box_office_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/22/us_box_office_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Box office report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/2010/03/22/us_box_office_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After three weeks in theaters, Disney film has raised $565.8 million worldwide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice remains the queen of the box office.</p><p>Johnny Depp and Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland" took in $34.5 million to remain the No. 1 movie for a third-straight weekend, according to studio estimates Sunday.</p><p>The Disney release raised its domestic haul to $265.8 million and its worldwide total to $565.8 million after just three weekends in theaters, a huge result for a film playing in the typically slow month of March.</p><p>"You rarely see this kind of domination by one movie at this time of year," said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. "Normally at this time of year, films don't make this kind of money, and they don't hold in this long."</p><p>"Alice in Wonderland" easily beat a rush of new movies led by 20th Century Fox's family film "Diary of a Wimpy Kid," which opened at No. 2 with $21.8 million. The movie is adapted from Jeff Kinney's cartoon novel about a sixth grader maneuvering through the intricate social structure at his middle school, which includes its own "cooties" game known as the "cheese touch."</p><p>"I think cheese touch equals magic touch at the box office," said Chris Aronson, head of distribution at 20th Century Fox.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/22/us_box_office_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/22/us_box_office_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Alice&#8217; extends her No. 1 stay with $62 million</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/us_box_office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/us_box_office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Box office report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/alice_in_wonderland/2010/03/15/us_box_office</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its second weekend, the Disney fantasy reaches $208.6 million domestically]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice is still ruling the movie palace.</p><p>Johnny Depp and Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland" easily remained the No. 1 weekend draw with $62 million, according to studio estimates Sunday. The Disney fantasy has climbed to a $208.6 million total domestically, becoming the first $200 million hit released this year.</p><p>In its second weekend in theaters, "Alice in Wonderland" pulled ahead of the $206.5 million domestic haul of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" to become the top-grossing of Depp and Burton's seven films together, which include "Edward Scissorhands," "Sweeney Todd" and "Corpse Bride."</p><p>"I believe it's literally the magical, if you would, pairing of Tim and Johnny," said Chuck Viane, head of distribution for Disney. "When you take those two, they always seem to make something really out of the ordinary."</p><p>"Alice in Wonderland" added $76 million overseas to bring its international total to $221 million and its worldwide gross to $430 million.</p><p>A rush of new movies had so-so openings, led by Matt Damon's Iraq War thriller "Green Zone," which debuted at No. 2 with $14.5 million domestically. Released by Universal, "Green Zone" stars Damon as the leader of a U.S. Army team who stumbles onto a conspiracy over the search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/us_box_office/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/us_box_office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Burton&#8217;s Alice in Underland</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/alice_in_wonderland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/alice_in_wonderland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice in Wonderland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/stephanie_zacharek/2010/03/04/alice_in_wonderland</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The director plays his best cards: Visual splendor, darkness, Johnny Depp. But has he fallen down a rabbit hole?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's disappointing enough that a movie whose title contains the word "wonder" should hold so little of it. It's even more disheartening that that movie should come from Tim Burton, a filmmaker whose imaginativeness -- working in tandem with his dark heart - - has given moviegoers so much pleasure over the years that even at the relatively tender age of 51, he's earned his own Museum of Modern Art retrospective. "Alice in Wonderland" is hardly a total disappointment: Burton has put the expected level of care into its production and character design, and the picture is a far more low-key affair than either of his last two live-action films, <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2007/12/21/sweeney_todd/index.html">"Sweeney Todd, the Demon Barber of Fleet Street"</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2005/07/15/charlie/index.html">"Charlie and the Chocolate Factory."</a> Unlike the former, "Alice" doesn't groan under the weight of thunderous pretentiousness, and unlike the latter, its garishness is, at least, of the muted sort.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/alice_in_wonderland/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/alice_in_wonderland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just say &#8220;9&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/9_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/9_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/09/09/9_review</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often gorgeous, this Tim Burton-infused "stitchpunk" animation is a mixed-up quilt of hackneyed yarns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10050913' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/09/story11.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Focus Features</p><p class="caption">9 (at left, voiced by Elijah Wood) and 7 (voiced by Jennifer Connelly) flee for their lives from the Fabrication Machine.</p><p>Elijah Wood needs to set some limits. I just don't think he should be playing plucky little heroes in quest narratives, especially ones with lovable, puppy-loyal sidekicks who must set out across hostile terrain into the lair of a forbidding enemy. Actually, the problem with wunderkind director Shane Acker's "stitchpunk" animated fantasy <a href="http://www.filminfocus.com/focusfeatures/film/9/overview">"9"</a> isn't so much that it bears a sped-up, dumbed-down resemblance to <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_lord_of_the_rings/">"The Lord of the Rings,"</a> although it does. It's more that Acker's dark and whimsical creation, so clearly in the tradition of his mentor Tim Burton, is wondrous to behold but offers only an indifferent and generic mishmash of quest fantasy and post-apocalyptic science fiction when it comes to story.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/9_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/09/9_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming movies: Awesome or awful?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coen Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/08/18/must_stop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry Gilliam and Tim Burton's latest, Britney and Lindsay do Bergman, and leaked Anne Frank-David Mamet dialogue]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10023284' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/08/story10.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Walt Disney Pictures</p><p class="caption">Mia Wasikowska as Alice in "Alice in Wonderland"</p><p>OK then, here's a pop quiz for pop-culture mavens. First, identify each of the following proposed movie projects. Second, identify which one I just pulled out of thin air. Or to put it another way, identify which one was <em>not</em> pulled out of thin air, or some darker, moister region, by someone sitting behind an extremely nice neo-retro desk in Los Angeles. After that we'll get to the subject of whether any of these motion pictures should exist at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sweeney Todd, the Demon Barber of Fleet Street&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/21/sweeney_todd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/21/sweeney_todd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/12/21/sweeney_todd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Burton's cinematic take on Stephen Sondheim's ultra-dark stage musical is about as satisfying as a tasteless meat pie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine, a fan of Broadway musicals who hadn't yet seen Tim Burton's film version of Stephen Sondheim's "Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street," asked me if Helena Bonham Carter -- not known as a singer -- could carry the material. I have no idea what it takes to carry material like this -- to sing songs whose melodies are like meandering, worm-shaped exoskeletons, deliberately fashioned with lots of twists and turns so more words can be crammed in. I understand why they'd be difficult to sing; what's harder to fathom is why anyone would want to bother. </p><p> These are more like art songs than show tunes, attempts at Brechtian insight and scale, which I presume is Sondheim's design: Anyone looking for hummable toe-tappers of the "Chicks and geese and ducks better scurry" variety should go play elsewhere. Only a shallow person would expect an actual melody to accompany lyrics of such nihilist significance as "There's a hole in the world like a great black pit/ and it's filled with people who are filled with shit/ And the vermin of the world inhabit it." This is complex, important music, people! Not for simple, cheerful folk by any means. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/12/21/sweeney_todd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/12/21/sweeney_todd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Tim Burton&#8217;s Corpse Bride&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/16/corpse_bride/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/16/corpse_bride/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2005/09/16/corpse_bride</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Victorian Gothic love letter from the Land of the Undead brims with life.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Michael Almereyda's funny, ardent and moving vampire picture, "Nadja," the title character, a downtown-Manhattan descendant of Count Dracula's, sums up the exquisite suffering of her lot: "Life is full of pain. But the pain I feel is the pain of fleeting joy." </p><p> The visual and narrative beauty of "Tim Burton's Corpse Bride" captures the essence of that line -- it hurts a little to watch the movie, not just because it's so deeply touching but because the medium itself is calling out to us from a lost world. Stop-motion animation of the sort Burton uses here -- and that he and director Henry Selick also used in the glorious 1993 <a href="/ent/movies/dvd/2000/12/22/nightmare/">"The Nightmare Before Christmas"</a> -- has been virtually wiped off the filmmaking landscape in favor of CGI. So while the story that's told in "Corpse Bride" -- a Victorian Gothic romance adapted from a Russian folktale -- is affecting in itself, the vitality and beauty of the textures and movement on-screen have a special poignancy. "Corpse Bride" isn't the sort of thing you see every day. It's in touch with the real world, yet out of step with it. This is filmmaking straight from the land of the undead. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/09/16/corpse_bride/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/16/corpse_bride/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Charlie and the Chocolate Factory&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/07/15/charlie_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/07/15/charlie_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2005/07/15/charlie</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Burton's psychedelic take on Roald Dahl's classic book is satisfying and delicious -- or at least completely nutty and fascinating.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are problems here and there with Tim Burton's "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory," problems that seemed extremely significant to me as I watched the movie but now, two days later, have melted into a syrupy puddle of abstraction. The picture's visual extravagance sometimes has an unpleasantly garish edge, and in places Johnny Depp's mechanically stylized lead performance feels strained and excessively conceptual. But enough about that for now: Did I really see a circle of 100 real, live squirrels perched on high white stools -- the futuristic pinwheel of a room around them looking like something out of "Sleeper" -- tapping walnuts to ascertain their quality and then either opening them gingerly or dismissively tossing them over their tiny shoulders? Did I really see an Oompa Loompa dressed in a witch-doctor outfit, doing a ceremonial jig with a cacao bean on his head? And did I really see a chorus of identical-looking dancers fasten neat little rubber sperm caps on their heads as a preamble to an Esther Williams-style water-ballet routine? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/07/15/charlie_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/07/15/charlie_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Big Fish&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/10/big_fish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/10/big_fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2003/12/10/big_fish</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Burton's latest whimsical holiday treacle features Albert Finney and Ewan McGregor in a saga of a tall-tale-spinnin' Southerner who won't shut up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are people always gassing on about the power of stories when it's so much more effective just to knuckle down and tell one already? We don't need a shaman to inform us that good stories are powerful. But since the '90s, at least, in both books and movies, there's been a marked trend toward reminding us just how important stories are, instead of just laying them on us, the old-fashioned way. </p><p> We get wordy preambles -- often delivered by a wise elder, usually a Southerner -- about how stories tell us who we are and where we've been. In a state of innocent hopefulness, we wait to hear the tale: Who knows? It might actually be good. But more often than not it turns out to be some magic-realism baloney about a giant fish in a stream or some similarly numbing metaphor for the unpredictability of life, or the brevity of life, or the importance of taking chances in life -- choose your own larger meaning and insert it here. Maybe the story would have been OK without the big windup. Then again, maybe it needed the advance advertising campaign because it wasn't such a great story to begin with. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/12/10/big_fish/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/10/big_fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Stone do &#8220;Stompanato&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/npfri_66/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/npfri_66/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/col/reit/2001/10/26/npfri</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The divine Ms. Sharon is back on track; Geri Halliwell: Proud to be a virgin! Plus: Helena Bonham Carter, all-latex home wrecker?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you still fretting about <b>Sharon Stone's</b> health can relax. Her husband, <b>Phil Bronstein,</b> has stepped up to assure us all that his wife is completely back to her old self again after her scary bout with a brain bleed. </p><p>"It was a dissected vertebral artery in her neck," Bronstein explained to E! News Daily. "They went in, not surgically, and they fixed it ... There's no chance of a recurrence, and she's really doing well." </p><p>So well, in fact, that she's starting to explore new film projects. If Sharon has her way, she'll soon be starring as <b>Lana Turner</b> in "Stompanato," a film about the actress and her rocky relationship with mobster <b>Johnny Stompanato.</b> </p><p>According to Variety, nothing's a done deal yet, but <b>Antonio Banderas'</b> name is being bandied about to play Stompanato, and Canadian director <b>Francois Girard</b> ("The Red Violin," "Thirty-Two Short Films About Glenn Gould") may direct. </p><p>And aren't you proud of me for getting through that entire item without even once mentioning undies or <a href="/people/col/reit/2001/06/13/npwed/index.html">komodo dragons</a>? </p><p><font size="1" color="#999999">- - - - - - - - - - - -</font> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/npfri_66/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/npfri_66/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Glow</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/31/glow_559/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/31/glow_559/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/glow/2001/07/31/glow</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon's TV picks for Tuesday, July 31, 2001]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Series</b> </p><p><b>Biography (8 p.m., A&E)</b> continues "Planet of the Apes" week with a new profile of Tim Burton, director of the "Apes" remake (and "Edward Scissorhands," "Batman" and "Ed Wood," among other films). <b>The Downer Channel (8:30 p.m., NBC)</b> spoofs the fear of clowns. <b>Nova (9 p.m., PBS, check local listings)</b> reruns a December 2000 report on anorexia that includes interviews with patients and a look at new approaches to eating disorders. The Sunrise Killer continues to make short work of the valiant and extremely deluded "detectives" on <b>Murder in Small Town X (9 p.m., Fox)</b>. </p><p><b>Specials</b> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/07/31/glow_559/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/31/glow_559/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Planet of the Apes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/planet_apes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/planet_apes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2001/07/27/planet_apes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks beautiful, feels menacing and features the luminous Helena Bonham Carter, but Tim Burton's remake is disappointingly conventional.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one can make foreboding look more inviting than Tim Burton. The first third of his "Planet of the Apes" is like an invitation to explore a lost kingdom both more brutal and more civilized than our own, a place where china teacups comfortably coexist with shadowy, spiky suits of armor. Cruelty may exist here, but good manners are still king. All done up in glossy, muted browns and sepias, richly embroidered tapestry interiors and opium-tinged Victoriana, Burton's planet is unsettlingly primitive-futuristic, but also as redolent of vanished glory as a Roman coin. It's not a place built to suit man; apes, with their soulful eyes and unassailable dignity even when caught flea picking and butt scratching, are the only creatures that could possibly be in charge here. </p><p>Burton, with the help of master cinematographer Philippe Rousselot and production designer Rick Heinrichs, has built the perfect primate planet. But he doesn't know quite what to do with it once he has set it up, and that's the major failing of this "Planet of the Apes." Burton catapults us into a world we've never seen before only to use it as a backdrop for a rather conventional battle picture, complete with a venerated war hero and a ploddingly simplified St. Crispin's Day speech. Past the first third, "Planet of the Apes" is entertaining enough, but it stops far too short of being completely seductive. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/planet_apes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/planet_apes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too much monkey business</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/26/classic_apes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/26/classic_apes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2001/07/26/classic_apes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The original "Planet of the Apes" and its four sequels helped Americans feel good about feeling bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1968 "Planet of the Apes" branded the ass of cinematic history with its final image: Charlton Heston, playing the film's misanthropic but resourceful human from the past, stumbles down a beach and comes upon the Statue of Liberty buried up to her neck. Heston suddenly comprehends the enormity of his situation: The Planet of the Apes is actually Earth! </p><p>The apes had taken over after the humans wiped out civilization with nuclear weapons. "Damn you! Damn you all to hell," shouts Heston, his misanthropy resoundingly justified. </p><p>The political message is ham-fisted but crystal clear: A nuclear holocaust will ruin us all. And then apes will take over the planet. Or something. </p><p>"Planet of the Apes," despite a couple of iconic images like that final scene, is a dreadful film, a compendium of clumsy dialogue, one-dimensional characters, risible plot turns and long silences broken by incomprehensible meaningful looks. But it has stayed with us because in conception, if not execution, the film had something to say. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/07/26/classic_apes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/26/classic_apes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Nightmare Before Christmas&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/22/nightmare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/22/nightmare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/dvd/2000/12/22/nightmare</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coffins and scorpions for the holidays! Plus: Two great Tim Burton animated shorts, "Vincent" and "Frankenweenie."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1" color="#000000"><b> Tim Burton's "The Nightmare Before Christmas" (Special Edition)</b> <br /> Directed by Henry Selick <br /> Starring the voices of Chris Sarandon, Danny Elfman, Catherine O'Hara <br /> Buena Vista; widescreen (1.66:1)<br /> Extras: Director commentary; making-of featurette; gallery of concept art, character design and animation tests; deleted footage; Tim Burton's short films "Vincent" and "Frankenweenie"</font> </p><p>When you're a kid, the scant two months between Halloween and Christmas seem interminable. Tim Burton bridges the gap with his wickedly delightful stop-motion animated feature "The Nightmare Before Christmas," which features Santa Claus being kidnapped and -- gently -- tortured by a trio of giggling little hobgoblins and their beastly boss. It just doesn't get any better than this. </p><p>But that's just one angle of the story. "The Nightmare Before Christmas" tells the tale of how Jack Skellington, a dapper denizen of Halloween Town, becomes entranced with -- and later obsessed by -- the neighboring village of Christmas Town and its corresponding celebration. As the gorgeous patchwork girl who has a crush on him, Sally, looks on, he rallies his fellow townspeople to create a Christmas of their own. They get into the swing of things without missing a beat, gleefully wrapping trinkets in coffin-shaped boxes and packing scorpions inside nesting dolls. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/22/nightmare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/22/nightmare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Pee-wee&#8217;s Big Adventure&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/peewees_big_adventure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/peewees_big_adventure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/dvd/review/2000/10/10/peewees_big_adventure</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director Tim Burton and star Paul Reubens wanted to take every prop home. Who wouldn't want a rocket ship in the living room?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1" color="#000000"><b>"Pee-wee's Big Adventure"</b><br /> Directed by Tim Burton<br /> Starring Paul Reubens, Elizabeth Daily<br /> Warner Home Video; widescreen (1.85:1 aspect ratio)<br /> Extras: Director and star audio commentary, music-only track with composer commentary, storyboards, more</font> </p><p>The only thing wrong with "Pee-wee's Big Adventure" is that the real world looks so drab and colorless by comparison. After the last frame, reacclimation to normal surroundings can be tough: You wish you had a giant box of magic crayons so you could rev up the hue of everything in sight. </p><p>That's no accident. As production designer David Snyder notes in one of the special DVD features, there wasn't a lot of time or money allotted for the project, so he and his crew had to use colors and shapes wisely to get the right look. Their motto, he says, was: "If it ain't bright, it ain't right." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/peewees_big_adventure/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/peewees_big_adventure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sleepy Hollow&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/sleepy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/sleepy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/1999/11/19/sleepy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Ichabod is a tortured, if not terribly bright, goth dreamboat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b> friend once described opium to me by explaining how it made him feel both<br />
drowsy and intensely, sensitively awake. That's how I'd describe the<br />
opening shots of Tim Burton's "Sleepy Hollow," a movie that begins working<br />
its visual seduction from its earliest images: a pool of sealing wax<br />
spilling onto a piece of paper like crimson blood; a carriage rambling<br />
through a countryside rendered diffuse in smoky blue light. The <i>look</i><br />
of Burton's Gothic dream landscape, both lulling and energizing, is vested<br />
with so much power that it could almost substitute for narrative drive.<br />
With each successive image, I found myself asking, "What's going to happen<br />
next?"</p><p>In Burton's loose, highly stylized re-imagining of Washington Irving's "The<br />
Legend of Sleepy Hollow," Ichabod Crane (<a href="/ent/col/srag/1999/11/18/depp/index.html">Johnny Depp</a>) isn't a knobby,<br />
awkward schoolteacher but a constable who's prone to rather<br />
dignified-looking bumbling. The story opens in 1799 New York: Ichabod has<br />
been assigned to investigate a number of horrific murders upstate, in which<br />
people's heads have been lopped off (with a fire-hot sword, no less) by the<br />
Headless Horseman. The Horseman was formerly a ruthless Hessian mercenary<br />
(played in the flashback sequences by a deliciously deranged Christopher<br />
Walken) who'd been beheaded and plopped into a sloppy grave by<br />
Revolutionary War soldiers, and who now haunts the nearby wood doing his<br />
dirty work.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/sleepy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/19/sleepy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johnny Deppth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/depp_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/depp_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/srag/1999/11/18/depp</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The soulful-eyed star tells why he played Ichabod Crane as a "fragile young 
girl" in "Sleepy Hollow."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>eguing from lightweight TV-series star to deep-dish actor has<br />
become increasingly commonplace (cf. Rick Schroder, Lisa Kudrow). But in the<br />
10 years since he made his leap from Fox-TV's "21 Jump Street,"<br />
<a href="/ent/movies/tayl/1998/05/26tayl.html">Johnny Depp</a><br />
has managed the transition in a manner worthy of the Guinness Book of World<br />
Records -- or the Alec Guinness School of Screen Chameleons. In his major<br />
roles he's been a shape-changer, going from the conscience-ravaged FBI agent<br />
of <a href="/feb97/brasco970228.html">"Donnie Brasco"</a> to the conscience-free Hunter S. Thompson surrogate<br />
("Raoul Duke") of <a href="/ent/movies/reviews/1998/05/cov_22reviewa.html">"Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas"</a><br />
without missing a beat or losing  an ounce of conviction.</p><p>Now he's taken on an American icon, Ichabod Crane, in Tim Burton's<br />
exquisitely phantasmagoric adaptation of Washington Irving's "The Legend of<br />
Sleepy Hollow," titled, simply, "Sleepy Hollow." He's given it his usual<br />
(that is, unusual) Depp charge. He transforms the icon into a complicated<br />
modern figure while staying true -- in some mysterious, intangible fashion --<br />
to its post-revolutionary America sardonic grotesquerie. (Irving set his<br />
fable in the 1790s and published it in 1820; the movie takes place<br />
specifically in 1799.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/depp_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/18/depp_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

