<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Title IX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/title_ix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why isn&#8217;t cheerleading a sport?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/23/cheerleading_is_not_a_sport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/23/cheerleading_is_not_a_sport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/23/cheerleading_is_not_a_sport</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge's decision to exclude cheering from Title IX riles coaches and supporters -- but is it a loss for women?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you're on an organized team that regularly competes on a national level in a physically demanding activity doesn't make it sport.</p><p>When Quinnipiac University eliminated its women's volleyball team for budgetary reasons last year and replaced it with a cheerleading team, the volleyballers sued, arguing that the decision violated Title IX. On Wednesday, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/sports/22sportsbriefs-titleix.html">U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill agreed</a>, writing, "The activity is still too underdeveloped and disorganized to be treated as offering genuine varsity athletic participation opportunities for students." Underdeveloped and disorganized? Ouch. And while Underhill's decision applies solely to Quinnipiac, it could set precedent at other colleges fighting for their own women's athletic departments -- and their funding.</p><p>Few other pursuits run the gamut in public perception that cheerleading does. Field hockey is pretty much just field hockey. But cheerleading, depending on your point of view, is either a serious, demanding sport, that thing people do on the sidelines while the real action is going on, or a bunch of chicks in short skirts and spirit fingers. No wonder Underhill's decision set off a wave of strong reactions on both sides of the semantic divide.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/23/cheerleading_is_not_a_sport/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/23/cheerleading_is_not_a_sport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge: Cheerleading not a college sport</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/cheerleading_not_a_sport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/cheerleading_not_a_sport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/21/cheerleading_not_a_sport</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Connecticut university cannot use Title IX to justify replacing women's volleyball with cheer squad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competitive cheerleading is not an official sport that colleges can use to meet gender-equity requirements, a federal judge ruled Wednesday in ordering a Connecticut school to keep its women's volleyball team.</p><p>The volleyball players had sued Quinnipiac University after it announced last year that it would eliminate the team for budgetary reasons and replace it with a competitive cheer squad.</p><p>The school contended the cheer squad keeps it in compliance with Title IX, the 1972 federal law that mandates equal opportunities for men and women in athletics.</p><p>"Competitive cheer may, some time in the future, qualify as a sport under Title IX," U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill wrote in his decision. "Today, however, the activity is still too underdeveloped and disorganized to be treated as offering genuine varsity athletic participation opportunities for students."</p><p>Quinnipiac has 60 days to come up with a plan to keep the volleyball team and comply with gender rules.</p><p>An activity can be considered a sport under Title IX if it meets specific criteria. It must have coaches, practices, competitions during a defined season and a governing organization. The activity also must have competition as its primary goal -- not merely the support of other athletic teams.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/cheerleading_not_a_sport/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/cheerleading_not_a_sport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lesbian athletes just can&#8217;t win</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/women_sports_homophobia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/women_sports_homophobia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/23/women_sports_homophobia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world of women's sports harbors rampant homophobia, especially toward female basketball players]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go by the official record, Sherri Murrell of Portland State University is the only lesbian coach in Division I women's basketball. She is, after all, the first and only coach to come out. The first and only, out of more than 350 teams.</p><p>One lesbian coach. Do you believe it?</p><p>Coach Murrell herself said that fear is thick for other gay coaches. "There's a lot of negative recruiting going on right now," she said in a recent <a href="http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbiansinsports/a/SherriMurrell.htm">interview</a>. That is, coaches competing for the best talent will dismiss another program as being a haven for dykes, playing on the homophobia of prospective athletes and their families, and so make their own program supposedly more appealing. Says Murrell: "You may not lose your job because of discrimination, but you may lose your job because all the sudden people are saying, don't go to that program because coach is a lesbian and then boom the program goes downhill. You lose your job because the program is not successful."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/women_sports_homophobia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/women_sports_homophobia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Female athletes score</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/title_ix_women_sports_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/title_ix_women_sports_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/20/title_ix_women_sports_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Title IX gets whipped back into shape after the misdeeds of the Bush years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, Vice President Joe Biden <a href="http://www2.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2010/04/04202010a.html">announced</a> that the Obama administration would issue a letter withdrawing the Bush administration's controversial 2005 interpretation of Title IX. Title IX is that old, famous policy that makes it illegal for schools receiving federal funding to discriminate "under any program or activity" based on sex. Though it doesn't mention athletics, it has become synonymous with the need to equalize opportunity between male and female college athletes.</p><p>There have always been three ways to comply with Title IX. First, a school can show that it has a representative number of athletes of both sexes involved in athletics: If 50 percent of your students are female, 50 percent of your athletes must be, too, to qualify under this prong.</p><p>If members of one sex are underrepresented -- generally, this is women -- then the school can show that it has "a history and continuing practice of program expansion" that is actually increasing the interests and skills of the underrepresented group.</p><p>It's the third prong of the test that's causing the controversy. Schools can also comply with Title IX by showing that they're meeting the desires and skills of the underrepresented sex "fully and effectively."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/title_ix_women_sports_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/21/title_ix_women_sports_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hot A-11 offense&#8217;s female cousin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/09/spread_offense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/09/spread_offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/10/09/spread_offense</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Piedmont High's all-eligible scheme is the talk of football, but a coach in a women's pro league says he's been running it for three years. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fame of coach Kurt Bryan and offensive coordinator Steve Humphries at tiny Piedmont High near Oakland, Calif., continues to grow. Their <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/07/25/a_11/">A-11 offense</a> was <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95035232">featured on NPR</a> two weeks ago, and when NPR is running stories about strategic innovations in high school football, you've got yourself a phenomenon.</p><p>"When I saw the A-11 offense, I said, 'Hey, that's an altered version of mine,'" says Joshua Penn, head coach of the California Quake. Penn installed his team's offense, which he calls the spread, in 2006, began using it heavily in 2007 and coached the Quake to an undefeated season with it this spring. They lost in the first round of the playoffs.</p><p>The IWFL playoffs, that is. To the Dallas Diamonds. The California Quake, who play in the Los Angeles suburb of Downey, are a <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/col/kaufman/2007/08/10/friday/">women's pro football</a> team.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/09/spread_offense/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/09/spread_offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WNBA brawl: Bad, but good?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/25/wnba/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/25/wnba/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/07/25/wnba</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tsk tsk and all that, but at least people are talking about the league.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were in charge of marketing for the WNBA, I would have planned for this week to go almost exactly the way it's gone. </p><p>A <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gTaEYhgPqhrxV8NLUisI9kkd32NQD923E0MO0">brawl</a> Tuesday at the Palace of Auburn Hills resulted in <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jJNjaRHkIuUyQnK-SOFxgd1b2-ygD924C88O5">suspensions</a> for 10 players from the Los Angeles Sparks and Detroit Shock, as well as Detroit assistant coach Rick Mahorn. In the wake of the brawl, the Shock signed 50-year-old playing legend <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/wnba/news;_ylt=AjVkfir.52xPNzMzmOTX1Z45nYcB?slug=ap-shock-lieberman&prov=ap&type=lgns">Nancy Lieberman</a> to a 10-day contract to leave the ESPN broadcast booth long enough to play one game, Thursday night in Houston against the Comets. </p><p>So that's three headlines -- brawl, suspensions, Lieberman -- in one week, which is about four more than the WNBA gets in a typical week, even during one of the lulls in the sports year, which we're in now. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/07/25/wnba/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/07/25/wnba/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorenstam, Henin quit while they&#8217;re ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/daily/feature/2008/05/15/retirement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The premier female golfer of her generation and the No. 1 tennis player in the world retire on consecutive days. Is something up?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the setup of some oddball espionage flick: On consecutive days, the world's top-ranked women's golf and tennis players announce their retirement. Who is retiring the great female sports stars of the world? </p><p>Annika Sorenstam said Tuesday that she'll be ending her career at the end of the golf season. On Wednesday, in a much bigger shocker, world No. 1 tennis player Justine Henin, two weeks shy of her 26th birthday and not injured, said she's walking away from the game effective immediately. She's the first player ever to quit at No. 1. </p><p>Imagine if Tiger Woods and Roger Federer had announced their retirements on consecutive days. They'd knock the NBA and NHL playoffs off the front pages for a week. </p><p>The bizarre coincidence of the timing of their announcements aside, Sorenstam and Henin's retirements don't have much in common. It would be easy to clump them together and ponder what it is that's forcing the top women out of their sports early. But it might not be all that fruitful. Sorenstam and Henin are separate cases. </p><p>Sorenstam is 37 and at a more logical point in her career to step away than Henin, especially since she's soon to be married for a second time and says she wants to have a baby. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/15/retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy birthday, Title IX</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/25/title_ix_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/25/title_ix_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2007/06/25/title_ix</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The statute, which banned sex discrimination in federally funded education programs, turns 35.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever someone else's birthday comes around I find myself saying, "Damn, when did you get so <i/>old</i>?" (though I keep the thought to myself unless I'm feeling particularly uncivilized). I found myself thinking the same thing when I came across two pieces in the San Francisco Chronicle celebrating Title IX's 35th birthday. It's a little hard to believe that as of this month, the statute has been leveling the playing field by banning sex discrimination in federally funded education programs for three and a half decades. </p><p> That is, until you look at the actual impact. Title IX has revolutionized high school and collegiate sports (and, as a result, professional sports). Before Title IX, 290,000 girls participated in high school athletics, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/06/24/INGOFQJ21M1.DTL&hw=women&sn=004&sc=649 ">reports</a> the Chronicle; now, more than 2.9 million girls dig their cleats into AstroTurf, dribble across a muddy soccer field and take part in all other manner of sport. The number of women participating in intercollegiate sports has risen from less than 32,000 to 180,000. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/06/25/title_ix_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/25/title_ix_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California hockey program keeps kids on the street</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/street_hockey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/street_hockey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2007/05/09/street_hockey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for girls in more ways than one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started playing ice hockey more than a decade ago, many people who saw me lugging my gear around assumed it must have been Take Your Boyfriend's Equipment to Work Day. Of course, women have been playing ice and street/roller hockey for years, starting much younger than I did. But only recently has women's or girls' hockey really been seen (outside sports programs) as a matter of course -- and I'm always happy to see the press treat it that way, too. Nice little case in point on a day, so far, of heavy posts: a <a href=http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070507/NEWS/70507008/1033/NEWS01>piece</a> in the Santa Rosa/Sonoma, Calif., Press Democrat about a kids' street hockey program at a Petaluma housing complex once blighted by gang violence. Today, the primary danger is the preteens' slap shot. Word is that the program, founded and by John van Wyk, a former Canadian minor leaguer and resident, has kept the local kids <i>on</i> the street, in a good way. Me, I just appreciated the fact that while the piece mentioned that the group is especially popular with girls, it treated their presence as, appropriately, unremarkable. No questions about how they like playing with boys, no observations that "even the girls" like the "rough and tumble" sport. Also, no puns. ("Chicks with sticks," etc.) Hat trick!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/street_hockey/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/street_hockey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not woman enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/18/gender_test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/18/gender_test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/12/18/gender_test</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Indian athlete's medal is being revoked because she failed a "gender test."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's an odd one: Indian athlete Shanti Sounderajan has failed a gender test and had her silver medal for the women's 800 meters competition at the recent Asian Games revoked, according to the <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/16264017.htm" target="_blank">Associated Press.</a> Strangely, reports of the test results were news to Sounderajan. "I was not informed about the test results and I don't know much on that," she said. "I do not want to talk about it." An Indian athletics official told the AP that Sounderajan's test revealed "abnormal chromosomes." For lack of detailed information, there's been some speculation that Sounderajan was born a male and later underwent a sex change. Or there's always the possibility that she's actually intersex. </p><p>It's unclear what kind of gender test Sounderajan underwent exactly. For me at least, a "gender test" sounds like an evaluation of stereotypically feminine traits, conjuring up images of apron-clad female athletes whipping up cookies for a panel of judges, or a white-gloved inspector rating their housekeeping skills. (Particularly when most of today's headlines have blared something to the effect of "Female athlete fails gender test.") But it seems safe to assume that Sounderajan underwent something along the lines of the sex testing instituted by the International Amateur Athletics Federation at the time of the 1960 Rome Olympic Games. At the time, there was hysteria over the possibility of male athletes masquerading as females and competing with an unfair strength advantage. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/12/18/gender_test/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/18/gender_test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls&#8217; sports: A no-boy zone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/01/sports_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/01/sports_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/11/30/sports</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just how fair is it to exclude a boy from his high school's girls' gymnastics team?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go, down that long rocky road to "fairness." Title IX may have been created to level a playing field steeply tilted against female athletes, but now it's being tested by boys who want to participate in girls' sports. Today the Associated Press <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/othersports/2080AP_GYM_Gymnastics_Gender.html" target="_blank">reported</a> that a Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 to uphold a previous dismissal of a lawsuit filed after a male student attempted to join his high school's girls' gymnastics team. </p><p> Keith Michael Bukowski had sued Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association, which maintains a policy not to allow boys to compete in girls' sports, on the grounds that the policy violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution as well as Title IX. He claimed that since his high school had no male gymnastics team he was being discriminated against. The court concluded that Bukowski failed to show that WIAA, a nonprofit organization of public and private high schools, was either an arm of the state (and therefore could be sued for the constitutional violation) or a federally funded organization (and thus subject to Title IX). </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/12/01/sports_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/01/sports_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turning back the clock on single-sex education</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/education_20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/education_20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/10/25/education</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Education retools Title IX, allowing more same-sex ed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the official Title IX backlash! Dear, sweet Title IX was passed in the halcyon(ish) days of 1972, banning sex discrimination in schools and activities that receive federal funds. It ensured equality in education for girls and is responsible for many of today's female <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathletes" target="_blank">mathletes</a> and soccer champs. Hooray! </p><p>But its days may be dwindling. Lately the so-called <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2006/06/26/boys_crisis_redux/index.html">boy crisis</a> in public schools has become every lazy media outlet's topic du jour, fueling the perception that girls get better college preparation than boys. That theory has been officially <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/25/AR2006062501047.html" target="_blank">debunked</a> with genuine research -- race and class turned out to be two of the real culprits for educational disparities, not gender -- but the Bush administration has yielded to the overblown boy crisis hysteria anyway. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/education_20/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/25/education_20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/12/what_else_111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/12/what_else_111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/10/12/what_else</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madonna in Malawi, the war on children, cat poop affects babies' sex and more!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/arts/entertainment-madonna-malawi-officials.html?_r=1&oref=slogin" target="_blank">Reuters:</a> Despite <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/col/fix/2006/10/05/thu/">protestations</a> to the contrary, it seems Madonna may be following in the footsteps of St. Angelina and adopting a 1-year-old boy from Malawi. Today Reuters reported that she received an interim order to adopt a child. Although it's hard not to view anything the pop star does as unconnected to her well-burnished image, this is an act that has no downside. The AIDS-afflicted country, which has a total population of around 13 million, has an estimated 900,000 orphans. If Madonna can make supporting the world's most deprived children into a trend, more power to her. </p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-un-children-violence.html" target="_blank">Reuters,</a> again: The U.N. reports that violence against children is a worldwide norm. Examples range from physical punishment in the schools of 106 countries around the world to ongoing traditions of female genital mutilation and forced marriages. And the U.S. isn't exempt -- as the New York Times recently <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70913FB3C540C738FDDA00894DE404482" target="_blank">reminded</a> us, in many states and counties across the U.S., principals paddling children is still the norm. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/12/what_else_111/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/12/what_else_111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women&#8217;s professional football: Fourth down and inches?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/19/womens_football/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/19/womens_football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/18/womens_football</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The still-growing sport remains just short of its goal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a retired ice hockey player, I can tell you from experience that even when women's ice hockey debuted as an Olympic sport, people were still confused. They'd hear I played on a women's amateur team in <a target="new" href="http://www.brooklynblades.org">Brooklyn,</a> and they'd ask, "Wow, was that you guys in Nagano?" (And those were the people who didn't say, "Wait. Field hockey?") </p><p> But even I was surprised to read, in yesterday's <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/18/sports/football/18football.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1">New York Times,</a> just how huge women's professional football has become. Yep. Women's professional football. <a target="new" href="http://members.aol.com/booinla/index.htm">Eighty teams,</a> three leagues; passionate players. Love it. (That, and the fact that the Times piece appeared in Sports and not, say, Styles.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/19/womens_football/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/19/womens_football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sports 1, Womanhood 0</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/24/deford_titleix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/24/deford_titleix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/05/24/deford_titleix</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPR's Frank Deford laments "the decline of women into the depths of the male athletic syndrome."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a piece featured on today's "Morning Edition," <a target="new" href=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5427299>NPR commentator Frank Deford</a> laments the "irony" of Title IX: that female athletes have begun to "mimic their fellow male jocks in all the wrong ways." Sinking grades and scummy sexualized hazing (see recent <a target="new" href=http://www.suntimes.com/output/sports/cst-spt-badjocks18.html>attention</a> to <a target="new" href=http://badjocks.com/>badjocks.com</a>); wholesale succumbing to the campus "athletic culture," even seduction by female coaches of student athletes. Sprinkling his comments with cheap shorthand ("the 'Desperate Housewives' effect," "the Tonya Harding award"), Deford observes that women seem to be "holding their own as malefactors in the male athletic realm." </p><p>Deford certainly has evidence for his observation. But what about his conclusion? "Oh, my," he sighs. "We had hoped when women started coming into sports in large numbers after the passage of Title IX that they would improve the institution, investing it with the finer feminine values. So far the results seem to indicate that instead sports has won, and womanhood has lost." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/24/deford_titleix/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/24/deford_titleix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Mexico boxer fights hometown despair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/18/michelle_lovato/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/18/michelle_lovato/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/01/18/michelle_lovato</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fast-punching, motorcycle-riding, role-modeling Michelle Lovato is Broadsheet's girl crush of the day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broadsheet's girl crush of the day: Espa&ntilde;ola, New Mexico, boxing sensation Monica Lovato. From today's <a target="new" href=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/18/national/18boxer.html>New York Times:</a> "[Laborious boxing movie references redacted] Monica Lovato, a slip of a super flyweight boxer at 5-foot-5 and 115 pounds, is carrying the hopes of her <a target="new" href=http://www.counterpunch.org/green11062004.html>drug-ravaged hometown</a> on her narrow shoulders ... Ms. Lovato, 28, who has fought her way out of a tormented family history to a 4-1 record and has been known to relax by jumping out of airplanes, is as much a champion as Espa&ntilde;olans have cheered in some time." </p><p>The Times describes Espa&ntilde;ola as "a way station on a major Mexican heroin route, where officials say drug abuse is so ingrained that grandparents teach parents and parents teach children to do drugs, where state troopers carry the opiate antidote Narcan to revive addicts who overdose, and where a Rio Arriba County commissioner once protested a crackdown saying, 'We're not going to declare war on our own relatives.'" It is one of the poorest areas in the nation. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/01/18/michelle_lovato/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/18/michelle_lovato/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does that spell? DANGEROUS!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/cheerleading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/cheerleading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/01/12/cheerleading</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheerleading is said to be the most dangerous sport of all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gone, mostly, are the days when people still believed that cheerleading is as much a "sport" as the Miss America pageant is a "scholarship competition." Yet -- occasional reports of freak accidents notwithstanding -- some may still think that the biggest dangers presented by cheerleading are eating disorders and airheadedness. </p><p>But if you read <a target="new" href=http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2006/01/08/high_risk/>this giant feature</a> in the Boston Globe, you'll find that "injuries for high school and college cheerleaders have more than doubled since the early 1990s ... with the estimated number of emergency-room visits spiking from fewer than 12,000 in 1991 to about 28,000 in 2004." The article continues: "And no other sport comes within shouting distance of cheerleading in terms of major injuries, such as spinal and head trauma ... Of the 101 catastrophic injuries sustained by female high school and college athletes between 1982 and 2004, 55 percent resulted from cheerleading -- more than every other sport combined." </p><p>As Dr. Frederick Mueller, director of the <a target="new" href=http://www.unc.edu/depts/nccsi/>National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research</a>, told the Globe: 'There's no doubt that [cheerleading] is the most dangerous women's sport.'" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/cheerleading/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/cheerleading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Reasons I Like &#8220;Rollergirls&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/rollergirls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/rollergirls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/01/12/rollergirls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) Punky Bruiser, 2) Miss Conduct, 3) Venis Envy, 4) Jailbait ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else watching <a target="new" href=http://www.aetv.com/rollergirls/>"Rollergirls"</a>? It's a reality show on A&E about the thriving roller derby scene in Austin. I'm kind of into it, and not just because I play another <a target="new" href=http://www.brooklynblades.org/>gals-on-skates</a> sport. Here's why: </p><p>1. It's nice to see women compete over something other than bachelors. (And yes, underneath its jock-burlesque trappings, roller derby -- while we won't see it in <a target="new" href=http://www.torino2006.org/ENG/OlympicGames/home/index.html>Turin</a> -- actually is a sport.) </p><p>2. These girls are HOT. (<a target="new" href=http://www.itsnotaboutthebra.com/>Brandi Chastain's bra</a> moment: how quaint it seems now!) But they're naturally, if punkily, so. And the camera doesn't leer. </p><p>3. I would totally hang out with these people. Unlike <a target="new" href=http://www.mtv.com/onair/laguna_beach/season2/main.jhtml>these people.</a> </p><p>4. The show is not trying to prove anything About Women. It's not trying to say "See? When women play sports, it's really about <i>friendship</i>!" (One team is resolutely nonbonding.) Or "See? Women can be both tough <i>and</i> feminine!" Or "See? When you get women together, they fight!" It just shows these gals -- all different, none turned into a type -- doing their thing. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/rollergirls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/12/rollergirls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sack college football, not Title IX</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/01/title_ix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/01/title_ix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2003 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/barra/2003/03/01/title_ix</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't blame the law that opened up sports to women for the demise of men's sports programs -- blame the good old boys who won't touch the biggest cash drain, football.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally when a law is surrounded by a storm of controversy, it's because the legislation resulted in some disaster that no one wants to take responsibility for. Title IX is proving to be the exact opposite. It's hard to think of a similar law passed within the last quarter century that has been more successful. In fact, it's not hyperbole to say that Title IX has been <i>spectacularly</i> successful, but you wouldn't know it from the acrimonious debates that have been eating up our sports pages for the past few weeks. </p><p>Title IX, which prohibits gender discrimination at educational institutions that receive federal funds, was signed into law -- let's give the devil his due -- by Richard Nixon in 1972. Twenty-one years ago there were, according to the General Accounting Office, fewer than 295,000 girls participating in sports at a high school level. There are currently slightly more than 2.7 million. Can anyone argue that this has not radically changed America for the better? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/01/title_ix/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/01/title_ix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuck in the minors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/18/sports_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/18/sports_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2000/09/18/sports</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book says that women will soon equal men at sports. If only it were true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1990s, "Tinker Bell gymnasts were no longer praised for their tininess. Developing figure skaters talked openly about devising changes in their technique to address the shift in balance produced by growing breasts and hips. They didn't make their bodies stop growing to accommodate the sport, as gymnasts and skaters used to have to do; instead, they made the sport accommodate their growing bodies ... The social skeleton look had vanished." </p><p> So writes Colette Dowling, author of "The Cinderella Complex," in her entertaining feminist argument about women's strength: "The Frailty Myth: Women Approaching Physical Equality." "By <i>making</i> themselves physically equal [through exercise and self-defense training]," Dowling writes, "women can at last make themselves free." </p><p> I loved this book. Dowling describes the achievements of the first woman to play men's pro baseball, the girls' soccer team that beat all the boys' teams in the 1993 Ohio games, a 10th-grader who made the all-state Georgia football team. Katherine Switzer dodged irate officials to compete in the all-male Boston Marathon. Bev Francis changed the face of women's bodybuilding by refusing to limit the size of her muscles to appropriately feminine proportions. Billie Jean King beat Bobby Riggs. These stories are so inspirational that I would like to believe every word Dowling says -- but some of her argument is just wishful thinking. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/18/sports_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/18/sports_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

