<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Toby Young</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/toby_young/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Newspaper hides its trans hate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/julie_burchill_hates_transsexuals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/julie_burchill_hates_transsexuals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transgender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Burchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transphobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Observer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzanne Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13171658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Observer publishes a scathing, transphobic editorial, then deletes it. Which is worse?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday, the London-based newspaper the Observer published a truly vile, transphobic column by outspoken journalist Julie Burchill. And then, in the face of a storm of controversy, it made the whole situation worse: It took down the piece.</p><p>The 53-year-old Burchill is famed for her brash, confrontational style. If you're unfamiliar with her work, imagine a less pleasant Glenn Beck. It must be exhausting having one's professional reputation based on a propensity for fit-pitching. So imagine the dander Burchill had to work up to file a column that would far exceed the controversy her friend Suzanne Moore stirred when she wrote flippantly that contemporary women are angry at <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/01/seeing-red-power-female-anger">"not having the ideal body shape – that of a Brazilian transsexual."</a> So intense had the response to the piece been that Moore felt compelled to <a href="http://www.digitalspy.com/media/news/a450863/suzanne-moore-returns-to-twitter-after-brazilian-transsexual-furore.html">quit Twitter</a>, citing a stream of "threatening, ignorant and nasty" responses, saying, "I am sorry to those that I misrepresented." It was quite a turnaround from the way she'd, not long before, complained about detractors who think they can <a href="http://www.wbez.org/blogs/nico-lang/2013-01/observers-war-trans-women-we-need-fight-trans-people-not-them-104924">"cut their dicks off and be more feminist than me."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/julie_burchill_hates_transsexuals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/julie_burchill_hates_transsexuals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
