<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Todd Akin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/todd_akin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The ever-changing ideologies of Jane Roe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Roe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norma McCorvey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new profile of Norma McCorvey reveals the complicated woman behind the historic abortion ruling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four decades ago, she was known as Jane Roe. She was already a mother, and when she became pregnant again she fought, all the way to the Supreme Court, for the right to terminate. And though that eventual decision came too late for her to act upon it, it changed reproductive freedom in this country -- and has been hotly fought over ever since. But Norma McCorvey has long made it clear she isn't the patron saint of abortion. And <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2013/01/commoditization-norma-mccorvey-jane-roe-wade">in a new profile in Vanity Fair</a> to mark the 40th anniversary of Roe v<em>.</em> Wade, she emerges as the most contradictory of figures, a woman who has built a career around disavowing her role in a history-making case.</p><p>McCorvey wasn't interviewed for Joshua Prager's profile. "I almost forgot i have a one thousand dollar fee," she texted him when he requested to speak to her. And when he declined to pay, she replied, "Then we wont speak." Why should she, when being Jane Roe has been her job? It's a job that has exasperated pro-choice activists and been exploited by the far right. Just last summer, "legitimate rape" expert Todd Akin erroneously cited her example as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/todd_akin_blame_law_order/">"false claims like those made in Roe v<em>.</em> Wade."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 was a banner year for antiabortion laws</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the war on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard mourdok]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[States passed 43 provisions restricting abortion last year, and zero to improve women's access to reproductive care]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/2012/statetrends42012.html" target="_blank">policy review</a> released by the Guttmacher Institute, 2012 saw the second-highest number of abortion restrictions ever enacted. The ranking comes as little surprise in a year when politicians like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock became household names, and one of the House's staunchest antiabortion members got second billing on the Republican presidential ticket.</p><p>During the year, 19 states enacted 43 provisions to restrict access to abortion services, whether mandating invasive ultrasounds, blocking health insurance coverage, shuttering women's health clinics or limiting access to the morning-after pill and contraception. The record for most restrictions was set in 2011 with 92.</p><p>The worst offenders? Arizona ranked No. 1, enacting seven antiabortion restrictions, and Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wisconsin followed close behind with at least three restrictions each.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Armey&#8217;s split from FreedomWorks followed attempted &#8220;coup&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/dick_armeys_split_from_freedomworks_followed_attempted_coup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/dick_armeys_split_from_freedomworks_followed_attempted_coup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedomworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agenda 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among other things, Armey reportedly demanded more support for Todd Akin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before Dick Armey took an $8 million payout to leave the Tea Party group FreedomWorks, he reportedly attempted a "coup" to oust his enemies and assert his control over the group.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/freedomworks-tea-party-group-nearly-falls-apart-in-fight-between-old-and-new-guard/2012/12/25/dd095b68-4545-11e2-8061-253bccfc7532_print.html">The Washington Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The day after Labor Day, just as campaign season was entering its final frenzy, FreedomWorks, the Washington-based tea party organization, went into free fall.</p> <p>Richard K. Armey, the group’s chairman and a former House majority leader, walked into the group’s Capitol Hill offices with his wife, Susan, and an aide holstering a handgun at his waist. The aim was to seize control of the group and expel Armey’s enemies: The gun-wielding assistant escorted FreedomWorks’ top two employees off the premises, while Armey suspended several others who broke down in sobs at the news.</p> <p>The coup lasted all of six days. By Sept. 10, Armey was gone — with a promise of $8 million — and the five ousted employees were back. The force behind their return was Richard J. Stephenson, a reclusive Illinois millionaire who has exerted increasing control over one of Washington’s most influential conservative grass-roots organizations.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/dick_armeys_split_from_freedomworks_followed_attempted_coup/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/dick_armeys_split_from_freedomworks_followed_attempted_coup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Todd Akin&#8217;s last hurrah: A way around the DADT repeal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/todd_akins_last_hurrah_a_way_around_the_dadt_repeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/todd_akins_last_hurrah_a_way_around_the_dadt_repeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Congressman's "conscience clause" amendment to the NDAA reportedly gets a second chance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd "legitimate rape" Akin will not be returning to Congress next year, but he may go out with a bang if his push for a way around the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" gets more traction.</p><p>Akin added a provision to the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act that would create a "conscience clause" for members of the military, essentially allowing them to cite their religious beliefs as cover for discriminating against gay and lesbian service members.</p><p>Akin's proposal was passed by the House in May with the rest of the NDAA, but it was dropped out of the Senate's version of the bill, which passed earlier this month. But now the bill is back in conference, and Republicans are reportedly pushing to put Akin's amendment back in.</p><p>Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Rep. Buck McKeon, R-Calif., both of whom vehemently opposed the DADT repeal, are negotiating the conference, and are "pushing pretty hard" to get Akin's provision back in, according to a House Democratic aide, who spoke with Mother Jones.</p><p>Adam Serwer of <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/todd-akin-dont-ask-dont-tell-republicans-defense-bill">Mother Jones</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/todd_akins_last_hurrah_a_way_around_the_dadt_repeal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/todd_akins_last_hurrah_a_way_around_the_dadt_repeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A judge shares Akin&#8217;s belief that women&#8217;s bodies &#8220;shut down&#8221; rape</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/a_judge_shares_akins_belief_that_womens_bodies_shut_down_rape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/a_judge_shares_akins_belief_that_womens_bodies_shut_down_rape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derek G. Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Festivus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Superior Court justice is admonished for his despicable remarks to a rape victim — four years later]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, hello again, rape culture. Why, it's been like, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/the_good_men_project_is_being_awfully_sympathetic_to_rapists/">HOURS since the last time we saw you</a>. How've you been? Still putting up the good fight, so to speak, I see.</p><p>Hey, speaking of putting up a fight, how about that Superior Court Judge Derek G. Johnson? What a card! Back in 2008, the Orange County judge was handing down a sentence on Metin Gurel, who'd been convicted of "<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-1213-judge-rape-20121214,0,6883428.story">rape, forcible oral copulation, domestic battery, stalking and making threats against his former live-in girlfriend."</a> Prosecutors, who'd asked for a 16-year term for the man, noted that on the day of the assault, he'd also threatened to mutilate the victim's genitals with a heated screwdriver. And what did Derek G. Johnson think of what Gurel had done? Not a whole heck of a lot.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/a_judge_shares_akins_belief_that_womens_bodies_shut_down_rape/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/a_judge_shares_akins_belief_that_womens_bodies_shut_down_rape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans&#8217; new Todd Akin moment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeanne Shaheen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are considering killing a measure that would give raped female soldiers free access to abortions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there’s one thing this election taught us, it’s that fighting against abortion in the case of rape should be avoided at all costs. And yet, Republicans may come back for another serving of Todd Akin’s humble pie.</p><p>Right now, if you’re a woman in the military, which has startlingly high rates of sexual assault, and you get raped, you face the added insult of having to pay for an abortion out of your own pocket. That’s because the military's health insurance plan is the only one in the federal government that does not cover abortion in the case of rape or incest. It'll only cover the procedure if the woman's life is in danger</p><p>Democrats in the Senate have tried to change this, but House Republicans have so far resisted, thus producing two different bills -- one with the change and one without. Yesterday, the House named its representatives to a bicameral committee that will hammer out the differences between the two bills, including this provision. While killing the amendment could reignite the explosive abortion and rape debate of the summer, Republicans generally oppose the expansion of reproductive rights, even for raped female soldiers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Akin slams bailout, asks for bailout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lame duck congressman has mixed feelings about moochers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an email to supporters today, outgoing Rep. Todd "legitimate rape" Akin, R.-Mo., had some unkind words for moochers in Michigan:</p><blockquote><p>The so-called “leadership” of cash-strapped Detroit has a message for President Obama: We voted for you, so bail us out.</p> <p>It’s sad, but true. In fact, just this past week Detroit City Councilwoman JoAnn Watson was quoted as saying: “Our people in an overwhelming way supported the re-election of this president and there ought to be a quid pro quo and you ought to exercise leadership on that. Of course, not just that, but why not?"</p></blockquote><p>He then quotes Ronald Reagan on how dependency leads to dictatorship and then monarchy. And if you make it to the end of the email Akin has just one more thing to add:</p><blockquote><p>P.S. – We still have a little ground to make up on our campaign debt retirement. I would be incredibly appreciative if you could click here to donate $5 or more today.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRSC quietly backed Akin in the end</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/nrsc_quietly_backed_akin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/nrsc_quietly_backed_akin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In September, NRSC Chair John Cornyn said "We have no plans to do so"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After insisting that Todd Akin was on his own in his bid for Senate in Missouri, the National Republican Senatorial Committee quietly sent him a life raft in the final days of the campaign.</p><p>Politico reports that the NRSC gave the money to the Missouri Republican Party, which spent it on a last-minute ad buy in support of Akin.</p><p>After Akin made his infamous "legitimate rape" comments, national Republicans <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/todd-akin-nrsc-karl-rove.php">condemned</a> his remarks and urged him to drop out of the primary, <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/todd-akin-nrsc-karl-rove.php">saying</a> they would not support him financially. In September, NRSC Chair John Cornyn, R-Texas, told the <a href="http://blogs.courier-journal.com/politics/2012/09/27/sen-john-cornyn-says-gop-is-not-going-to-spend-money-to-help-missouri-senate-candidate-todd-akin/">Kentucky Courier-Journal</a> that the plan hadn't changed and the NRSC wouldn't support Akin. “We have no plans to do so,” he said, adding: “I just think that this is not a winnable race."</p><p>“We’re done,” he also told <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/250865-demint-might-throw-akin-a-lifeline">the Hill</a> in September.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/nrsc_quietly_backed_akin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/nrsc_quietly_backed_akin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An 11-year-old rape victim is not a temptress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/an_11_year_old_rape_victim_is_not_a_temptress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/an_11_year_old_rape_victim_is_not_a_temptress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Rivard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Texas rape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A jury convicts a man of sexual assault -- but after his lawyer compares the case to "the spider and the fly"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should not, in America in 2012, be this hard. Not just this hard to get a tough verdict on a crime that went on for months, one that was <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20041138-504083.html">documented and shared like a trophy</a> around the local middle school. It should not be this hard to get it through anybody's head that an 11-year-old child who's been repeatedly abused is not the problem here. Or that anybody who makes it his job to paint a little girl who's been raped as a predatory vixen is an inexcusably shoddy excuse for a human being.</p><p>In Texas on Wednesday, <a href="http://www.chron.com/default/article/Defendant-in-Cleveland-gang-rape-case-gets-life-4073766.php">a jury convicted 20-year-old Jared Len Cruise</a> of aggravated sexual assault for his role in the gang rapes of an 11-year-old girl from the small town of Cleveland. The case attracted national attention – including <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/new_york_times_blames_11_year_old_rape_victim/ ">an outrageous New York Times story</a> that quoted the child's neighbors' judgment of her: "She dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said." Investigators believe the assaults began when the girl accepted a ride from a local 19-year-old.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/an_11_year_old_rape_victim_is_not_a_temptress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/an_11_year_old_rape_victim_is_not_a_temptress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fake cure for Akin-ism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Chocola]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican establishment's plan to avoid a repeat of the Todd Akin debacle ignores the real problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s no denying that Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock were embarrassments for the Republican Party in 2012, and that their nominations cost the GOP otherwise winnable Senate seats and complicated its efforts to take back the chamber. Similarly, there’s no doubt that Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle and Ken Buck were embarrassments for the GOP in 2010 and lost races that should have been gimmes for the party.</p><p>But a fight is breaking out on the right over the precise significance of these defeats, and what can be done to avoid a repeat in 2014.</p><p>In the wake of this month’s election, the outgoing chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83893.html">suggested</a> the committee might junk its <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1109/Cornyn_NRSC_wont_play_in_primaries.html">hands-off approach</a> to Republican primaries going forward.</p><p>“What is the goal here?” he asked. “I think the goal is to elect principled conservatives in November, not just nominate somebody in the primary that has very little chance of getting elected in November. That doesn’t advance the conservative agenda, because you have to get elected before you can govern.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worse than the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP is blaming Akin and Mourdock for its blowout Senate defeat. It might want to look at its policies instead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> If there was anything Republicans should have been surprised about in this month’s elections, it was their rout in the Senate. Not only did they lose races against vulnerable Democratic incumbents in GOP leaning states—Missouri, Florida, and Montana, for instance—but they also lost almost every competitive open race and failed to hold a vacant one in Indiana.</p><p><em>Politico</em> <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B72FEC3F-ED86-4968-9991-994E3ECD874B">reports</a> that GOP leaders are working to prevent a repeat of this scenario by exerting more control over the nomination process. Republicans believe that they would have done better had they kept politicians like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock out of the picture. The goal for the next four years is to erase the Tea Party-versus-Washington narrative that has made it difficult to get establishment Republicans through the primary process:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing Christians didn&#8217;t always hate women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at a 1978 study document reveals their war on reproductive rights is newer than you might think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> In the autumn of 1978 the Washington Association of Churches and the Washington State Catholic Conference jointly published a <a href="http://awaypoint.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/abortion-an-ecumenical-study-document-autumn-1978/" target="_blank">six-page pamphlet</a> they called “Abortion: An Ecumenical Study Document.” Their work offers a fascinating snapshot of Christian thinking at the time and raises some equally fascinating questions about what, exactly, has happened in the last 35 years.</p><p>The pamphlet does not contain a position statement. Quite the opposite, in fact. From the beginning, the authors explain that such an agreement is impossible: "Clearly there is no Christian position on abortion, for here real values conflict with each other, and Christian persons who seek honestly to be open to God’s call still find themselves disagreeing profoundly."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 glaring contradictions that sank the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans will point to the country's shifting demographics, but they ultimately have only themselves to blame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Enough uplifting, all-purpose notions of why Obama and Democrats prevailed, some pertinent (like demographics), many laughable: it was Sandy the storm, tons of “stuff” Obama promised, or Democratic voter repression (right!). “No, no,” disbelievers shout, “Mitt was too moderate, or too extreme, his V.P. too fixated.” Or Obama was simply superior on the stump. Below such media noise rumbles a larger tectonic, thus my nomination for what made this election significant: a gang of rightwing contradictions reared up, then crashed and burned.</p><p>While this trend transcends any one folly, Romney was the ideal, fossilized Republican awash in a fantasy golden age when bountiful bosses generated jobs and pampered laborers. Likewise, what bizarre political deviance tabbed Paul Ryan as more than a shrill ideologue with zero national clout? For the first time, both misfits atop a national ticket lost their home states. Remarkably, even that matchless twosome, McCain-Palin, outpolled (and outwinked) the votes to Romney-Ryan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush adviser threatens to cut out Republicans&#8217; tongues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Hughes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karen Hughes doesn't want to hear "anything about rape other than it is a horrific, violent crime"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/11/karen-hughes-ill-cut-out-the-tongue-of-gopers-talking-149146.html#.UJ-w3nB_g9g.twitter">Op-Ed</a> for Politico, former George W. Bush adviser Karen Hughes writes that Republicans need to learn from their 2012 losses and "set a tone that is more respectful, positive and inclusive."</p><p>"And," Hughes continues, "if another Republican man says anything about rape other than it is a horrific, violent crime, I want to personally cut out his tongue. The college-age daughters of many of my friends voted for Obama because they were completely turned off by Neanderthal comments like the suggestion of 'legitimate rape.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How choice became a winning issue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/how_choice_became_a_winning_issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/how_choice_became_a_winning_issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "legitimate rape" debate put our focus back on the right of all women to make a tough decision for themselves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit that the outrage over Todd Akin's idiotic "legitimate rape" comments worried me, for a while. It seemed as though we were in danger of accepting a Republican way of looking at choice: that there are only a handful of righteous reasons a woman can make that decision, and in all other situations, the verdict belongs to the state.</p><p>I was wrong. What Akin actually did, with the help of extremist vice-presidential nominee Paul Ryan and a late-breaking assist from doomed Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock, was restore women -- their health, privacy and integrity -- to the center of the abortion debate.</p><p>Because once you started parsing "legitimate rape," the controversy became a microcosm of the moral complexity of the entire choice issue. Once you insist, as Paul Ryan did, that "the means of conception" don't matter, and all abortion should be illegal, you wake people up to your political agenda, and your cruelty.</p><p>Suddenly Americans had to try to imagine how doctors or hospital administrators or law enforcement officials would decide what was "legitimate rape," as opposed to something else. Rape panels?</p><p>Well, that's the same slippery slope you're sent down if you think hard about abortion under other circumstances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/how_choice_became_a_winning_issue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/how_choice_became_a_winning_issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still want to fight a war on women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tammy Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin win; Akin and Mourdock are defeated. But it's no time for women to be complacent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago, three words were <a href="http://upsettingrapeculture.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">projected</a> on the U.S. Capitol by a feminist group: "Rape is rape." It was momentous, but only to a point.</p><p>After all, by then President Obama had already <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57496599-503544/akin-apologizes-for-rape-comments-obama-says-rape-is-rape-/" target="_blank">repeated</a> that feminist mantra rejecting a hierarchy of rape: In August, he'd announced that "Rape is rape" in response to Todd Akin's blithe invocation of "legitimate rape." Three days after the words appeared on the Capitol, Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock's talk of rape and God's gifts <a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/10/obama-on-mourdock-rape-is-rape-147149.html" target="_blank">gave</a> the president occasion to say it again. <em>Rape is rape.</em> You could complain that this was still being debated in 2012, and many did, but why would profound disruption come fast or easy? No, it was an urgent dividing point, and the president himself had chosen a side.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;ve never been more hopeful&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liveblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic Novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[108 year old first voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Rolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo-calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liveblog: The president eloquently accepts a second term of office -- and vows to build on the progress we've made]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you seeing and hearing in your state and at the polling place? Send information and photos to readermail@salon.com.</p><p>[liveblog id=38]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-choice, pro-gun, you name it. Eight Democrats who want -- but don't deserve -- your vote tomorrow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This hasn't been a great year for progressive causes. Whether you're a woman, an immigrant, an environmentalist or a person who doesn't want to be killed by a gun (the list goes on), the 112th Congress was pretty much a disaster.</p><p>And while it's extremists like Richard Mourdock, Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who received progressives’ derision for saying (and voting for) completely off-the-wall stuff, plenty of Democrats got in on the rape-denying, gun-loving, science-hating action, too. While these Blue Dogs might not want to repeal health care reform (well, except when they <a href="http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/57769/larry-kissell">do</a>), their records should still give you pause. Here are eight conservative Democrats who are hurting their party <em>and</em> their country -- but still want your vote.</p><p>[slide_show id=13063497]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Booyah! Jim Cramer predicts landslide victory for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire McCaskill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stockpicker thinks he sees alpha]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not easy finding unconventional wisdom.</p><p>The Washington Post’s Outlook section sure tried. It asked 13 authorities for election predictions, even going so far as to reach beyond the usual Beltway pundits, strategists and gadflies. But with one exception, anyone looking for unique opinions will be disappointed.</p><p>Mostly respondents fell in line with mainstream numbers and predicted a narrow victory for President Obama. A 12th-grade government class, a meteorologist, a couple pundits and operatives, two tech guys and a poker player all have him beating Mitt Romney with 314 electoral votes or fewer. (A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win.) Only GOP strategist Leslie Sanchez and the Post’s horse-racing writer Andrew Beyer predict Romney winning a close race.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Akin gets mysterious influx of campaign money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_gets_mysterious_influx_of_campaign_money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_gets_mysterious_influx_of_campaign_money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire McCaskill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the final days of his campaign, Akin gets a big boost from outside donors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With just a few days left in the campaign, Todd Akin is pouring money into a series of ad buys in Missouri, with the help of a surge of cash from the Missouri Republican Party. But there is some speculation that a chunk of that money came from national Republicans, who previously <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/nrsc_stands_behind_mourdock/">backed away</a> from supporting Akin after his "legitimate rape" comments.</p><p>The <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/akin-finds-funding-in-final-days-of-senate-race/">New York Times</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>"Nearly a million of those dollars on television ad buys are coming from Mr. Akin’s campaign, while the rest is from outside groups, and there is speculation that organizations that previously distanced themselves from the six-term Congressman could be behind some of the new spending.</p> <p>The Missouri Republican Party coordinated with the Akin campaign for a $387,000 ad buy, a spokesman for Mr. Akin said, while the campaign itself made a $300,000 purchase two days ago. The spokesman, Rick Tyler, said the Akin campaign planned to make another $600,000 ad buy on Thursday."</p></blockquote><p>At the end of October, the state GOP had $375,000, indicating that it might have gotten some additional help from outside donors.</p><p>The National Republican Senatorial Committee has <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/01/abortion-rape-focus-of-new-akin-ad-new-funding-a-mystery/">repeatedly</a> <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/nrsc-todd-akin-buzzer.php">declined</a> to comment about whether it's paying for the ads, though the RNC said it wasn't them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_gets_mysterious_influx_of_campaign_money/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_gets_mysterious_influx_of_campaign_money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>