<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tom Cruise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tom_cruise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mission: Impossible &#8212; Ghost Protocol&#8221;: At long last, the year&#8217;s best action flick</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mission_impossible_ghost_protocol_at_long_last_the_years_best_action_flick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mission_impossible_ghost_protocol_at_long_last_the_years_best_action_flick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10427581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Take an aging star often viewed as a weirdo, a director who's never made a live-action film and the fourth installment of a 15-year-old movie franchise whose roots go back to 1960s television. What do you get? Well, it certainly could have been a total disaster, or an awkward nostalgia exercise, but instead <a href="http://www.missionimpossible.com">"Mission: Impossible -- Ghost Protocol"</a> is something even more unlikely: the most exciting action flick of the year, by a huge margin. Director Brad Bird brings all the wit, style and imagination of his animated films (<a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/06/29/ratatouille/">"Ratatouille,"</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/11/05/incredibles/">"The Incredibles"</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/17/iron_giant/">"The Iron Giant"</a>) to this slick secret-agent techno-fantasy. As for 49-year-old Tom Cruise, he's surely ready for a comeback after weathering the worst publicity of his celebrity career. He's back in his comfort zone here as renegade super-spy Ethan Hunt, who is exactly the kind of charismatic, overamped control freak we all believe (rightly or wrongly) that Cruise is too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mission_impossible_ghost_protocol_at_long_last_the_years_best_action_flick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mission_impossible_ghost_protocol_at_long_last_the_years_best_action_flick/">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mission_impossible_ghost_protocol_at_long_last_the_years_best_action_flick/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mission_impossible_ghost_protocol_at_long_last_the_years_best_action_flick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mission_impossible_ghost_protocol_at_long_last_the_years_best_action_flick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jessica Chastain: The dazzling redhead who&#039;s suddenly everywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/jessica_chastain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/jessica_chastain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take Shelter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tree of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto International Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jessica Chastain may not yet qualify as a movie star, but within seconds of meeting her you completely understand why every casting agent in Hollywood is convinced she will become one. To put it bluntly, she is dazzling -- and I'm talking more about her manner and presence than her beauty, although she's exceptionally pretty, with flaming red hair and pale, translucent skin. She's vivacious and charming, seemingly without effort, and has the kind of spectacular smile that uplifts everyone's spirits within a 50-foot radius.</p><p>It makes you wonder where all those casting directors and filmmakers who so desperately want Chastain in their movies now were a few years ago, when she was a little-known television actress whose biggest part had been a four-episode role on "Law &amp; Order: Trial by Jury." There are no answers beyond the usual clich&#233;s: Showbiz is full of pretty faces, and sometimes all it takes is one little break. Chastain's break was pretty big, and came when Terrence Malick cast her opposite Brad Pitt in <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/the_tree_of_life/index.html" class="storyLink">"The Tree of Life,"</a> where her shimmering, ethereal presence created a thematic and visual balance to Pitt's intense, compulsive, authoritarian father-figure.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/jessica_chastain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessica Chastain may not yet qualify as a movie star, but within seconds of meeting her you completely understand why every casting agent in Hollywood is convinced she will become one. To put it bluntly, she is dazzling &#8212; and I&#8217;m talking more about her manner and presence than her beauty, although she&#8217;s exceptionally pretty, with flaming red hair and pale, translucent skin. She&#8217;s vivacious and charming, seemingly without effort, and has the kind of spectacular smile that uplifts everyone&#8217;s spirits within a 50-foot radius.</p><p>It makes you wonder where all those casting directors and filmmakers who so desperately want Chastain in their movies now were a few years ago, when she was a little-known television actress whose biggest part had been a four-episode role on &#8220;Law &amp; Order: Trial by Jury.&#8221; There are no answers beyond the usual clich&#233;s: Showbiz is full of pretty faces, and sometimes all it takes is one little break. Chastain&#8217;s break was pretty big, and came when Terrence Malick cast her opposite Brad Pitt in <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/the_tree_of_life/index.html" class="storyLink">&#8220;The Tree of Life,&#8221;</a> where her shimmering, ethereal presence created a thematic and visual balance to Pitt&#8217;s intense, compulsive, authoritarian father-figure.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/jessica_chastain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/jessica_chastain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: 10 pieces of culture we&#8217;re feeling iffy about</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hunger Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>1.	Natalie Portman is now a mommy:</strong> The "Black Swan" had <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20498509,00.html">a little duckling this week</a> that she is naming god knows what. Probably something odd though &#8230; that's how celebrities are, you know?</p><p><strong>2. Speaking of which:</strong> Robin Williams named his daughter Zelda <a href="http://thestir.cafemom.com/entertainment/121860/robin_williams_becomes_next_awesome">because he liked the video game</a>.</p><p>
    <object height="349" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bINUfbLV_0M&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bINUfbLV_0M&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object>
  </p><p><strong>3. Gwyneth Paltrow just can't stop being "Glee"-ful:</strong> The GOOP founder showed up at <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2011/06/gwyneth-paltrow-glee-live-surprise-concert-new-jersey.html">the live show on Thursday night</a> in New Jersey to sing "Forget You." Again? Again.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/18/pop_torn_timberlake_weed_portman_baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do so many people dislike Katie Holmes?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Katie Holmes truly so terrible? Well, she's probably not all that great. In recent weeks, she's been the subject of toxic rumors that her new thriller, "Son of No One," was <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/25/us-sundance-bomb-idUSTRE70O0M620110125">such a bomb</a> at Sundance that audience members stormed out -- a tale eagerly lapped up by legitimate news organizations like Reuters. The Hollywood Reporter observed, "When Katie showed up on screen, there was <a href="http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/katie-holmes/katie-holmes%E2%80%99-sundance-bomb-464170">a collective groan.</a> She plays the wife of a Queens cop and she was completely miscast. They have her cursing a lot. And when she swore, there were chuckles."&#160; And even though other critics who attended the screening have since <a href="http://omg.yahoo.com/blogs/thefamous/katie-holmes-victim-of-smear-campaign/506">offered differing accounts</a> of what really went on, the fact that such a rumor started -- and took off with such vigor -- gives an indication of how little Holmes is regarded by audiences and the press.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/katie_holmes_kennedys_hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Romantics&#8221;: A &#8220;Big Chill&#8221; for this decade?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Romantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/09/09/romantics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.theromanticsmovie.com/">"The Romantics,"</a> a pleasantly lo-fi ensemble movie written, directed and produced by Galt Niederhoffer (and based on her own novel into the bargain), we've got the collision of two or maybe three achingly meaningful narrative and cinematic modes. It's a wedding movie! It's a country-house movie! (Arguably, the wedding-at-a-country-house movie, almost always set on the New England coast, is already its own genre.) It's one of those "Big Chill"-type reunion movies, where an entire generation -- or at least its richer, whiter, better-looking microcosm -- faces the fact that it's not as young as it used to be and that its dreams have, alas, turned to dust!</p><p>OK, I'm being mean, largely because "The Romantics" is a middling little movie that tries to trespass on Bergman-Renoir territory and simply isn't adroit enough to pull it off, and because in its weaker moments it's overheated and silly. Niederhoffer's title is meant to refer to her characters, whose collegiate clique took on the name thanks to their incestuous dating habits, but also to the Romantics in the English-lit, turn-of-the-19th-century sense. So we get Katie Holmes and Josh Duhamel, as the maid of honor and intended bridegroom, not merely snogging furiously out in the woods on the night before the wedding like a couple of soap opera characters, but also murmuring snatches of "Ode to a Nightingale" into each other's ears.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.theromanticsmovie.com/">&#8220;The Romantics,&#8221;</a> a pleasantly lo-fi ensemble movie written, directed and produced by Galt Niederhoffer (and based on her own novel into the bargain), we&#8217;ve got the collision of two or maybe three achingly meaningful narrative and cinematic modes. It&#8217;s a wedding movie! It&#8217;s a country-house movie! (Arguably, the wedding-at-a-country-house movie, almost always set on the New England coast, is already its own genre.) It&#8217;s one of those &#8220;Big Chill&#8221;-type reunion movies, where an entire generation &#8212; or at least its richer, whiter, better-looking microcosm &#8212; faces the fact that it&#8217;s not as young as it used to be and that its dreams have, alas, turned to dust!</p><p>OK, I&#8217;m being mean, largely because &#8220;The Romantics&#8221; is a middling little movie that tries to trespass on Bergman-Renoir territory and simply isn&#8217;t adroit enough to pull it off, and because in its weaker moments it&#8217;s overheated and silly. Niederhoffer&#8217;s title is meant to refer to her characters, whose collegiate clique took on the name thanks to their incestuous dating habits, but also to the Romantics in the English-lit, turn-of-the-19th-century sense. So we get Katie Holmes and Josh Duhamel, as the maid of honor and intended bridegroom, not merely snogging furiously out in the woods on the night before the wedding like a couple of soap opera characters, but also murmuring snatches of &#8220;Ode to a Nightingale&#8221; into each other&#8217;s ears.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom bombs while &#8216;Toy Story 3,&#8217; Sandler soar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/27/us_box_office_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/27/us_box_office_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toy Story 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/27/us_box_office_13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Toy Story 3" gang and Adam Sandler are finding plenty of playmates at movie theaters. Tom Cruise is not so popular, though.</p><p>The Disney-Pixar Animation smash "Toy Story 3" remained the No. 1 film with $59 million in its second weekend, raising its domestic total to $226.6 million, according to studio estimates Sunday.</p><p>Sandler's "Grown Ups" debuted at No. 2 with a healthy $41 million. Released by Sony, the comedy costarring Kevin James, Chris Rock, David Spade and Rob Schneider did well despite a thrashing from critics.</p><p>Cruise's thriller "Knight and Day" fizzled at No. 3 with $20.5 million. It was the worst result for a Cruise action flick in 20 years and a sign that audiences still have not forgiven him for erratic behavior a few years back, which included his couch-jumping incident on Oprah Winfrey's show.</p><p>"He's one of the biggest stars of all time, but no question, this has impacted him," said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. "It's not like it's irrevocable or unchangeable. Look at all the stars who have been jailed or caught in compromising sexual situations and then came back. Many stars do recover. It just may take a lot of time for him."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/27/us_box_office_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Toy Story 3&#8243; gang and Adam Sandler are finding plenty of playmates at movie theaters. Tom Cruise is not so popular, though.</p><p>The Disney-Pixar Animation smash &#8220;Toy Story 3&#8243; remained the No. 1 film with $59 million in its second weekend, raising its domestic total to $226.6 million, according to studio estimates Sunday.</p><p>Sandler&#8217;s &#8220;Grown Ups&#8221; debuted at No. 2 with a healthy $41 million. Released by Sony, the comedy costarring Kevin James, Chris Rock, David Spade and Rob Schneider did well despite a thrashing from critics.</p><p>Cruise&#8217;s thriller &#8220;Knight and Day&#8221; fizzled at No. 3 with $20.5 million. It was the worst result for a Cruise action flick in 20 years and a sign that audiences still have not forgiven him for erratic behavior a few years back, which included his couch-jumping incident on Oprah Winfrey&#8217;s show.</p><p>&#8220;He&#8217;s one of the biggest stars of all time, but no question, this has impacted him,&#8221; said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. &#8220;It&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s irrevocable or unchangeable. Look at all the stars who have been jailed or caught in compromising sexual situations and then came back. Many stars do recover. It just may take a lot of time for him.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/27/us_box_office_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/27/us_box_office_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Cruise&#8217;s crazy, clever comeback attempt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/knight_and_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/knight_and_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight and Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/06/23/knight_and_day</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>June, the klutzy-cute heroine of <a href="http://www.knightanddaymovie.com/">"Knight and Day"</a> played by Cameron Diaz, knows right away that renegade CIA agent and/or psychopath Roy Miller is the guy for her. It becomes even more obvious after Roy hijacks a plane, kills everyone on it except June, slips her a date-rape drug and breaks into her Boston apartment to put her to bed. Then, to close the deal, he shoots her charming, lunkhead-ish firefighter ex-boyfriend. OK, just in the leg. Before fleeing the scene of that particular crime, Roy exchanges a dudely handshake with the downed fireman, assuring him he hasn't fractured his thigh or severed his femoral artery. "It could be the best thing that ever happened to him," Roy purrs to June. "He'll be a hero."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/knight_and_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June, the klutzy-cute heroine of <a href="http://www.knightanddaymovie.com/">&#8220;Knight and Day&#8221;</a> played by Cameron Diaz, knows right away that renegade CIA agent and/or psychopath Roy Miller is the guy for her. It becomes even more obvious after Roy hijacks a plane, kills everyone on it except June, slips her a date-rape drug and breaks into her Boston apartment to put her to bed. Then, to close the deal, he shoots her charming, lunkhead-ish firefighter ex-boyfriend. OK, just in the leg. Before fleeing the scene of that particular crime, Roy exchanges a dudely handshake with the downed fireman, assuring him he hasn&#8217;t fractured his thigh or severed his femoral artery. &#8220;It could be the best thing that ever happened to him,&#8221; Roy purrs to June. &#8220;He&#8217;ll be a hero.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/knight_and_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/knight_and_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church of Scientology convicted of fraud in France</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/eu_france_scientology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/eu_france_scientology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2009/10/27/eu_france_scientology</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Paris court convicted the Church of Scientology of fraud and fined it more than euro600,000 ($900,000) on Tuesday but stopped short of banning the group as prosecutors had demanded.</p><p>The group's French branch immediately announced it would appeal the verdict.</p><p>The court convicted the Church of Scientology's French office, its library and six of its leaders of organized fraud. Investigators said the group pressured members into paying large sums of money for questionable financial gain and used "commercial harassment" against recruits.</p><p>The group was fined euro400,000 ($600,000) and the library euro200,000. Four of the leaders were given suspended sentences of between 10 months and two years. The other two were given fines of euro1,000 and euro2,000.</p><p>However, the court did not order the Church of Scientology to shut down, ruling that it would be likely to continue its activities anyway "outside any legal framework."</p><p>Prosecutors had urged that the group be dissolved in France and fined euro2 million ($3 million).</p><p>The verdict is "an Inquisition of modern times," said Scientology spokeswoman Agnes Bron, referring to efforts to rout out heretics of the Roman Catholic Church in centuries past.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/eu_france_scientology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Paris court convicted the Church of Scientology of fraud and fined it more than euro600,000 ($900,000) on Tuesday but stopped short of banning the group as prosecutors had demanded.</p><p>The group&#8217;s French branch immediately announced it would appeal the verdict.</p><p>The court convicted the Church of Scientology&#8217;s French office, its library and six of its leaders of organized fraud. Investigators said the group pressured members into paying large sums of money for questionable financial gain and used &#8220;commercial harassment&#8221; against recruits.</p><p>The group was fined euro400,000 ($600,000) and the library euro200,000. Four of the leaders were given suspended sentences of between 10 months and two years. The other two were given fines of euro1,000 and euro2,000.</p><p>However, the court did not order the Church of Scientology to shut down, ruling that it would be likely to continue its activities anyway &#8220;outside any legal framework.&#8221;</p><p>Prosecutors had urged that the group be dissolved in France and fined euro2 million ($3 million).</p><p>The verdict is &#8220;an Inquisition of modern times,&#8221; said Scientology spokeswoman Agnes Bron, referring to efforts to rout out heretics of the Roman Catholic Church in centuries past.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/eu_france_scientology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/eu_france_scientology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming movies: Awesome or awful?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coen Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/08/18/must_stop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10023284' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/08/story10.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Walt Disney Pictures</p><p class="caption">Mia Wasikowska as Alice in "Alice in Wonderland"</p><p>OK then, here's a pop quiz for pop-culture mavens. First, identify each of the following proposed movie projects. Second, identify which one I just pulled out of thin air. Or to put it another way, identify which one was <em>not</em> pulled out of thin air, or some darker, moister region, by someone sitting behind an extremely nice neo-retro desk in Los Angeles. After that we'll get to the subject of whether any of these motion pictures should exist at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10023284' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/08/story10.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Walt Disney Pictures</p><p class="caption">Mia Wasikowska as Alice in &#8220;Alice in Wonderland&#8221;</p><p>OK then, here&#8217;s a pop quiz for pop-culture mavens. First, identify each of the following proposed movie projects. Second, identify which one I just pulled out of thin air. Or to put it another way, identify which one was <em>not</em> pulled out of thin air, or some darker, moister region, by someone sitting behind an extremely nice neo-retro desk in Los Angeles. After that we&#8217;ll get to the subject of whether any of these motion pictures should exist at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/18/must_stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Valkyrie&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/25/valkyrie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/25/valkyrie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2008/12/25/valkyrie</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bryan Singer's "Valkyrie" has been kept under tighter wraps than the actual plot to assassinate Hitler. The release date was moved hither and yon several times, and the movie began screening relatively late for critics during the busy holiday season, and some had to talk their way into being invited at all. It's not always easy to read a studio's motives in keeping movies shielded from early coverage: It could mean they think they've got something that's worth protecting -- or something worth hiding as long as possible, as a form of damage control.</p><p>Or it could mean that said movie features a once-huge star who may not have the drawing power with audiences he once had, and who may feel he needs a degree of protection from possible criticism. Tom Cruise, who dominates "Valkyrie" as Col. Claus von Stauffenberg, the aristocrat turned officer who came close to assassinating Hitler in 1944 by sneaking a bomb into his private conference room, has become He Who Cannot Be Named unless you're going to say something nice. He's also the weakest link in "Valkyrie," which is neither a masterpiece nor an embarrassment, but a workmanlike picture that sits, inoffensively, in the middling space between.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/25/valkyrie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/25/valkyrie/">http://www.salon.com/2008/12/25/valkyrie/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/25/valkyrie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/25/valkyrie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/11/alaska_experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/11/alaska_experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battlestar Galactica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2008/05/11/alaska_experiment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Dead <a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/05/05/the-kentucky-derby-tragedy.html">horses</a>, deadly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/world/asia/08myanmar.html?hp">cyclones</a>, erupting <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Weather/popup?id=4803224&contentIndex=1&start=false&page=1">volcanoes</a>, evil <a href=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/austria/1934037/Austrian-police-We-believed-Josef-Fritzl's-lies.html>monsters</a>, priests floating away on <a href=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5geOKyG0MVGdO4y7C1wpgT62mD7YQD907A3580>helium balloons</a>, never to be heard from again, plus even more dumb people with <a href=http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view.bg?articleid=1091832&srvc=home&position=recent>babies</a> ... The news is so dark these days, it's not surprising that all our favorite TV shows are doing their best imitations of a Lifetime movie of the week -- you know, the one where the kid <i>and</i> the kid's pony die at the end? </p><p> But you know what makes all the little children feel better about how dark and scary the world is? Fairy tales. So let's start with a fairy tale about a little prince named Tom Cruise. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/11/alaska_experiment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/11/alaska_experiment/">http://www.salon.com/2008/05/11/alaska_experiment/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/11/alaska_experiment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/11/alaska_experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cannes rumors: No Coens, but &#8220;Indy 4&#8243; and &#8220;Sex&#8221; likely</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cannes_rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cannes_rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coen Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Clooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tilda Swinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribeca Film Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and the City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribeca Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2008/03/20/cannes_rumors</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="art c"> <img class='wp-image-10083623' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/03/story44.jpg' />
<p class="credit">New Line Cinema</p>
<p class="caption">Kristin Davis, Sarah Jessica Parker, Cynthia Nixon and Kim Cattrall in the movie "Sex and the City: The Movie."</p>
</p><p>Sure, it's only March, but with the big winter-spring festivals at <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/sundance_film_festival/">Sundance,</a> <a href="/ent/movies/review/2008/02/14/berlin/">Berlin</a> and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/south_by_southwest/">South by Southwest</a> already in the rear-view mirror, the film industry's undead cave dwellers are beginning to see the entire year's calendar come into focus. Sure, it's pointless and more than a little geeky, but what the heck -- it's not too early for a little <a href="http://www.festival-cannes.fr/en">Cannes</a> gossip, is it? </p><p> Here's what we know for sure: nothing. Cannes head programmer Thierry Fr&eacute;maux won't reveal his slate for two more weeks, and his subordinates are sworn to public silence. Last year many bloggers and trade magazines knowledgeably reported that Woody Allen's <a href="/ent/movies/review/2008/01/18/cassandras_dream">"Cassandra's Dream"</a> would premiere at the C&ocirc;te d'Azur fest, and of course it didn't. (In fairness, Allen evidently turned down Cannes' closing-night slot, which is somewhere between a booby prize and a black hole leading into a lifeless alternative dimension.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cannes_rumors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c"> <img class='wp-image-10083623' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/03/story44.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">New Line Cinema</p><p class="caption">Kristin Davis, Sarah Jessica Parker, Cynthia Nixon and Kim Cattrall in the movie &#8220;Sex and the City: The Movie.&#8221;</p><p>Sure, it&#8217;s only March, but with the big winter-spring festivals at <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/sundance_film_festival/">Sundance,</a> <a href="/ent/movies/review/2008/02/14/berlin/">Berlin</a> and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/south_by_southwest/">South by Southwest</a> already in the rear-view mirror, the film industry&#8217;s undead cave dwellers are beginning to see the entire year&#8217;s calendar come into focus. Sure, it&#8217;s pointless and more than a little geeky, but what the heck &#8212; it&#8217;s not too early for a little <a href="http://www.festival-cannes.fr/en">Cannes</a> gossip, is it? </p><p> Here&#8217;s what we know for sure: nothing. Cannes head programmer Thierry Fr&eacute;maux won&#8217;t reveal his slate for two more weeks, and his subordinates are sworn to public silence. Last year many bloggers and trade magazines knowledgeably reported that Woody Allen&#8217;s <a href="/ent/movies/review/2008/01/18/cassandras_dream">&#8220;Cassandra&#8217;s Dream&#8221;</a> would premiere at the C&ocirc;te d&#8217;Azur fest, and of course it didn&#8217;t. (In fairness, Allen evidently turned down Cannes&#8217; closing-night slot, which is somewhere between a booby prize and a black hole leading into a lifeless alternative dimension.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cannes_rumors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cannes_rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Lions for Lambs&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/09/lions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/09/lions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/11/09/lions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Lions for Lambs" is just about everything I hate in a movie: It's self-righteous, didactic, dramatically and visually static and, in places, extremely boring. But I found myself thinking about it for hours, even days, after I saw it, which is more than I can say for most of the politically themed fiction movies -- <a href="/ent/movies/review/2007/09/14/elah/">"In the Valley of Elah,"</a> <a href="/ent/movies/review/2007/10/19/rendition/">"Rendition"</a> -- that have trickled quietly into and out of theaters this fall. </p><p> "Lions for Lambs," I'm afraid, is destined for the same kind of trickling. This isn't so much a movie as an impassioned plea -- on the part of director <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/robert_redford/">Robert Redford</a> and writer Matthew Michael Carnahan -- to think about the nature of citizenship, to think about what it means for anyone, on the right, the left or anywhere in between, to serve his or her country. The idea of "serving our country" is almost always used in a military context. But one of the things "Lions for Lambs" strives toward is finding a new frame of reference for that phrase. All of the movie's characters -- two soldiers, close friends, stationed in Afghanistan; an oily Republican senator and the wily journalist who spars with him; a history professor who's trying to jolt one of his most promising students out of his cocoon of privileged complacency -- have to work out the phrase's meaning on their own. That each comes up with a different answer is the point. Whatever the movie's flaws are, it has at least a modest grasp of the sprawling mess we call democracy, which Winston Churchill called the worst form of government, except for every other. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/09/lions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lions for Lambs&#8221; is just about everything I hate in a movie: It&#8217;s self-righteous, didactic, dramatically and visually static and, in places, extremely boring. But I found myself thinking about it for hours, even days, after I saw it, which is more than I can say for most of the politically themed fiction movies &#8212; <a href="/ent/movies/review/2007/09/14/elah/">&#8220;In the Valley of Elah,&#8221;</a> <a href="/ent/movies/review/2007/10/19/rendition/">&#8220;Rendition&#8221;</a> &#8212; that have trickled quietly into and out of theaters this fall. </p><p> &#8220;Lions for Lambs,&#8221; I&#8217;m afraid, is destined for the same kind of trickling. This isn&#8217;t so much a movie as an impassioned plea &#8212; on the part of director <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/robert_redford/">Robert Redford</a> and writer Matthew Michael Carnahan &#8212; to think about the nature of citizenship, to think about what it means for anyone, on the right, the left or anywhere in between, to serve his or her country. The idea of &#8220;serving our country&#8221; is almost always used in a military context. But one of the things &#8220;Lions for Lambs&#8221; strives toward is finding a new frame of reference for that phrase. All of the movie&#8217;s characters &#8212; two soldiers, close friends, stationed in Afghanistan; an oily Republican senator and the wily journalist who spars with him; a history professor who&#8217;s trying to jolt one of his most promising students out of his cocoon of privileged complacency &#8212; have to work out the phrase&#8217;s meaning on their own. That each comes up with a different answer is the point. Whatever the movie&#8217;s flaws are, it has at least a modest grasp of the sprawling mess we call democracy, which Winston Churchill called the worst form of government, except for every other. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/09/lions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/09/lions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/25/thu_50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/25/thu_50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2007/01/25/thu</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Morning Briefing:</b> <br> <img class='wp-image-10024951' src='http://media.salon.com/2007/01/washington.jpg' /><a target="new" href="http://lifeandstylemag.hollywood.com/2007/01/life_style_exclusive_isaiah_wa.php">"Grey's" star goes to rehab:</a> In a classic Hollywood move, "Grey's Anatomy" actor Isaiah Washington, in the midst of really bad P.R. after his repeated use of the term "faggot," has checked himself into some kind of treatment facility. In a statement he released yesterday, Washington said: "With the support of my family and friends, I have begun counseling. I regard this as a necessary step toward understanding why I did what I did and making sure it never happens again." Insiders say that ABC demanded that he enter a program "to examine why he would say such hateful words," but there's no word yet on just what type of facility Washington has gone into. (Life &amp; Style) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/01/25/thu_50/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Morning Briefing:</b> <br /> <img class='wp-image-10024951' src='http://media.salon.com/2007/01/washington.jpg' /><a target="new" href="http://lifeandstylemag.hollywood.com/2007/01/life_style_exclusive_isaiah_wa.php">&#8220;Grey&#8217;s&#8221; star goes to rehab:</a> In a classic Hollywood move, &#8220;Grey&#8217;s Anatomy&#8221; actor Isaiah Washington, in the midst of really bad P.R. after his repeated use of the term &#8220;faggot,&#8221; has checked himself into some kind of treatment facility. In a statement he released yesterday, Washington said: &#8220;With the support of my family and friends, I have begun counseling. I regard this as a necessary step toward understanding why I did what I did and making sure it never happens again.&#8221; Insiders say that ABC demanded that he enter a program &#8220;to examine why he would say such hateful words,&#8221; but there&#8217;s no word yet on just what type of facility Washington has gone into. (Life &amp; Style) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/01/25/thu_50/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/25/thu_50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/20/mon_154/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/20/mon_154/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2006/11/20/mon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Morning Briefing:</b> <br> <a target="new" href="http://www.starmagazine.com/celebrity_news_gossip/entertainment/10330">TomKat ties the knot:</a> Though they legally got married <a target="new" href="http://www.tmz.com/2006/11/19/guests-to-tomkat-so-this-was-all-bogus/">last week</a> in Los Angeles, Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes staged an elaborate wedding in Italy over the weekend, complete with a rented castle, Giorgio Armani and fireworks. The <a target="new" href="http://www.tmz.com/photos/tomkat-wedding-circus/93694/">photos</a> give you some idea of the scale, but the ceremony's couch-jumping moment was an <a target="new" href="http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=18&amp;art_id=32183&amp;sid=10963953&amp;con_type=3">everlasting kiss,</a> which Armani told reporters went on for so long that guests began to yell "Stop, stop!" (Star, TMZ, the Standard) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/20/mon_154/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/20/mon_154/">http://www.salon.com/2006/11/20/mon_154/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/20/mon_154/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/20/mon_154/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/17/fri_160/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/17/fri_160/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2006/11/17/fri</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Morning Briefing:</b> <br> <img class='wp-image-10057110' src='http://media.salon.com/2006/11/oj_mug.jpg' /><a target="new" href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1jr.htm">The Judith Confessions:</a> On Thursday night, book publisher Judith Regan sent an exclusive statement to the Drudge Report, explaining her motivation in publishing O.J. Simpson's "If I Did It," as well as her reasons behind personally sitting down with the ex-pro-footballer turned author for an interview that will air on Fox in two weeks. A selection of quotes: </p><p>"I never lost my desire for his conviction. And if Marcia Clark couldn't do it. I sure wanted to try." </p><p>"'To publish' does not mean 'to endorse'; it means 'to make public.' If you doubt that, ask the mainstream publishers who keep Adolf Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' in print to this day. They are likely to say that there is a historical value in publishing such material, so that the public can read, and judge for themselves, the thoughts and attempted defenses of an indefensible man." </p><p>"But that is not why I did it. That is not why I wanted to face the killer. That is not why I wanted to publish his story." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/17/fri_160/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/17/fri_160/">http://www.salon.com/2006/11/17/fri_160/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/17/fri_160/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/17/fri_160/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls just want to have frills (and cats)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/vows_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/vows_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/11/15/vows</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here at Broadsheet we've been planning to turn a blind eye to the upcoming nuptials between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise. Sure, we've <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2005/11/16/klein/index.html">written</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2006/05/01/cruise/index.html">about</a> TomKat <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2006/03/29/katie_silent_birth/index.html">now</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2006/05/05/kate/index.html">again,</a> but those were darker times, back before the midterm elections. Today, however, our best-laid plans were scuttled by Reuters <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/15/AR2006111500257.html" target="_blank">reporting</a> that "when Tom Cruise marries Katie Holmes this weekend, like many a devout Scientologist, he may promise to provide her with 'a pan, a comb, perhaps a cat.'" How can we overlook the fact that Operating Thetans pledge their love using language straight out of <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2005/12/06/goodnight_moon/index.html">"Goodnight Moon"</a>? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/vows_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/vows_3/">http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/vows_3/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/vows_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/vows_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/wed_171/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/wed_171/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2006/11/15/wed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Morning Briefing:</b> <br> <a target="new" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/ap_on_en_tv/simpson_interview">O.J. to address the hypothetical:</a> Not only is it true that, as rumored, O.J. Simpson has written a book detailing what he <i>would</i> have done <i>if</i> he'd killed his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman -- the tome, cleverly titled "If I Did It," is reportedly coming out Nov. 30 -- but he'll be discussing his hypothetical plan in a two-part interview on Fox a few days before the book hits stores. Fox's breathless press release says, "O.J. Simpson, in his own words, tells for the first time how he would have committed the murders if he were the one responsible for the crimes," and a Fox executive bleats, "This is an interview that no one thought would ever happen. It's the definitive last chapter in the Trial of the Century." ContactMusic <a target="new" href="http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/article/oj%20breaks%20down%20while%20reading%20his%20book_1013703">reports</a> that Simpson broke down in tears during the interview, saying, "I can't do this. I can't have my kids hear me say this." The interview will air Nov. 27 and 29. (Yahoo News, ContactMusic) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/wed_171/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/wed_171/">http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/wed_171/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/wed_171/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/15/wed_171/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/13/mon_153/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/13/mon_153/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2006/11/13/mon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Morning Briefing:</b> <br> <a target="new" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/470562p-396055c.html">Their big, fat Italian wedding:</a> Next weekend marks the long-doubted nuptials for Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, and the Daily News says the wedding's taking place in Italy. The couple is reportedly tying the knot at the 16th century Castello Odescalchi, which overlooks Lake Bracciano, northwest of Rome. The local mayor has cast doubt on whether the marriage will be legally binding, saying, "On an Italian level, there are papers and documents that we certainly don't have." But the couple's flack tells the News, "All of the proper and necessary arrangements are being made to assure the legality of the marriage." (N.Y. Daily News) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/13/mon_153/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/13/mon_153/">http://www.salon.com/2006/11/13/mon_153/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/13/mon_153/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/13/mon_153/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fix</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/03/fri_158/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/03/fri_158/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/col/fix/2006/11/03/fri</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Morning Briefing:</b> <br> <a target="new" href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117953175.html?categoryId=13&amp;cs=1">Cruise lands at United Artists:</a> Viacom chief Sumner Redstone might not think much of Tom Cruise, but somebody at MGM Studios evidently does -- Cruise and his producing partner, Paula Wagner, have been named the new heads of MGM's United Artists. They'll be in charge of reviving the U.A. label, which hasn't released a movie since "Art School Confidential" in May, and will be making four or five films a year. (Variety) </p><p> <a target="new" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=7&amp;entry_id=10523">Jolie and Pitt get al-Qaida threats:</a> On location in Pune, India, for her new movie "A Mighty Heart," Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have reportedly been receiving death threats from a group claiming affiliation with al-Qaida. The Financial Times reports that some security experts think the political nature of the movie -- the story's based on the life of murdered Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl -- may have made the celeb couple a terrorist target. (Financial Times via Daily Dish) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/03/fri_158/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/03/fri_158/">http://www.salon.com/2006/11/03/fri_158/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/11/03/fri_158/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/11/03/fri_158/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

