<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tom Delay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tom_delay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>John Edwards&#8217; creepy mug shot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/john_edwards_mugshot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/john_edwards_mugshot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/15/john_edwards_mugshot</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The disgraced senator flashes an unnerving grin -- just like Tom DeLay]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the pictures of <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/01/weinergate_timeline">Anthony Weiner</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/15/newt_gingrich_caption_competition/index.html">(allegedly) a sunbathing Newt Gingrich</a> weren't too much for you, here's another unsettling image: <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/HornickCNN/statuses/81043750608052224">CNN's Ed Hornick has posted</a> John Edwards' mug shot. Edwards, who faces felony charges for allegedly using over $1 million of campaign cash to hide his extramarital affair and child, went for the unnerving smile with accompanying cold, dead eyes for his photo:</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10015766' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/06/jedwardsx2_69d062e.jpg' />
  </p><p>The image is reminiscent of Tom DeLay from the Republican former House majority leader's mug shot. (DeLay was ultimately convicted on conspiracy and money-laundering charges.)</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10015767' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/06/tom_delay_mugshot.jpg' />
  </p><p>We wonder whether the smiles here are meant to convey confidence or an image of innocence. If so, neither man succeeded.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/john_edwards_mugshot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/john_edwards_mugshot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Patrick McHenry, the rudest, most shameless College Republican in Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course he was unfair to Elizabeth Warren: He was trained by the most cutthroat political organization around]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_McHenry#Connections_with_Countrywide_Mortgage_Scandal">Countrywide</a>) called Elizabeth Warren a liar at the conclusion of a House Oversight subcommittee hearing that had already consisted mainly of Republican members of Congress getting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/24/elizabeth-warren-liar-gop-facts-cfpb_n_866505.html">very basic information about Warren's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau completely wrong.</a> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RET2Z5AVJ8A" width="425"></iframe></p><p>McHenry has been one of the most completely shameless of House Republicans since his arrival in Congress, in 2005, when he immediately and publicly endorsed Tom DeLay's brilliant plan to exempt himself from ethics rules as his connections to Jack Abramoff began to end his career. But he was born to be cheerfully corrupt: He's a product of the College Republicans, an organization that trains little Lee Atwaters, Karl Roves and Grover Norquists in the arts of scorched-earth campaigning and wholly irresponsible "governing" on behalf of the monied interests that bought you your job. The ethos is win by any means necessary, legal or quasi-legal (or worse, as long as you never get caught), and McHenry was very good at that, according to <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0510.wallace-wells.html">Benjamin Wallace-Wells' memorable profile of the then-freshman in the Washington Monthly.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of Tom DeLay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/15/tom_delay_conviction_dubose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/15/tom_delay_conviction_dubose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/15/tom_delay_conviction_dubose</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And why he'll probably never spend a day in prison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, Tom DeLay was sentenced to three years in prison on two felony charges, conspiracy and money laundering, in a campaign finance corruption case that had dragged on for years.</p><p>The sentencing of DeLay, once one of the most powerful Republicans in Washington and the majority leader of the House of Representatives, was largely ignored because of the aftermath of the mass shooting in Arizona.</p><p>But it's an extraordinary story -- and one that's not quite over. When he was indicted in Texas in 2005, DeLay's political career sustained a fatal blow. He was forced to step down from his House leadership position and, in 2006, he resigned from Congress.&#160;</p><p>The charges arose after DeLay set up a PAC to funnel corporate money, which is barred in Texas elections, to candidates for the state legislature. The group raised $190,000 and funneled it through the&#160;national Republican Party, which then distributed the money to several state-level candidates in Texas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/15/tom_delay_conviction_dubose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/15/tom_delay_conviction_dubose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom DeLay sentenced to 3 years in prison</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/10/us_delay_trial_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/10/us_delay_trial_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/10/us_delay_trial_3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former U.S. House majority leader was convicted of money laundering and conspiracy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A judge has ordered U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay to serve three years in prison for his role in a scheme to illegally funnel corporate money to Texas candidates in 2002.</p><p>The sentence comes after a jury in November convicted DeLay on charges of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. DeLay was once one of the most powerful men in U.S. politics, ascending to the No. 2 job in the House of Representatives.</p><p>The former Houston-area congressman had faced up to life in prison. His attorneys asked for probation.</p><p>Senior Judge Pat Priest issued his ruling after a brief sentencing hearing on Monday in which former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert testified on DeLay's behalf.</p><p>Priest declined to hear testimony from the state's only witness.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/10/us_delay_trial_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/10/us_delay_trial_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury convicts Tom DeLay in money-laundering trial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/25/us_delay_trial_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/25/us_delay_trial_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/24/us_delay_trial_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DeLay maintains his innocence and plans to appeal the verdict it took 19 hours to reach]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay -- once one of the most powerful and feared Republicans in Congress -- was convicted Wednesday on charges he illegally funneled corporate money to Texas candidates in 2002.</p><p>Jurors deliberated for 19 hours before returning guilty verdicts against DeLay on charges of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. He faces up to life in prison on the money laundering charge.</p><p>After the verdicts were read, DeLay hugged his daughter, Danielle, and his wife, Christine. His lead attorney, Dick DeGuerin, said they planned to appeal the verdict.</p><p>"This is an abuse of power. It's a miscarriage of justice, and I still maintain that I am innocent. The criminalization of politics undermines our very system and I'm very disappointed in the outcome," DeLay told reporters outside the courtroom. He remains free on bond, and his sentencing was tentatively set to begin on Dec. 20.</p><p>Prosecutors said DeLay, who once held the No. 2 job in the House of Representatives and whose heavy-handed style earned him the nickname "the Hammer," used his political action committee to illegally channel $190,000 in corporate donations into 2002 Texas legislative races through a money swap.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/25/us_delay_trial_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/25/us_delay_trial_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No federal charges for Tom DeLay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/tom_delay_innocent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/tom_delay_innocent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/16/tom_delay_innocent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Justice Department decides not to charge the former House majority leader for his connections to Jack Abramoff]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom DeLay has finally been completely vindicated. After a six-year investigation, the Justice Department <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41104.html">has declined to press charges against DeLay</a> for his connections to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.</p><p>Former top DeLay aides Michael Scanlon and Tony Rudy pleaded guilty years ago to corruption charges, but apparently DeLay himself did not violate any federal laws.</p><p>Which, of course, doesn't mean that DeLay <em>isn't</em> still an amoral, unethical scumbag. The details of DeLay's relationship with Abramoff are a matter of public record, and while <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5492833">blocking legislation banning sweatshops in the Northern Mariana islands</a> from reaching the floor of the House, as a favor to Abramoff, isn't a <em>crime</em>, it is still probably not something you want to brag about.</p><p>DeLay still faces charges in Texas for conspiracy and being just as corrupt as everyone always knew he was.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/tom_delay_innocent/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/tom_delay_innocent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats deserve credit &#8212; not blame &#8212; on ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/08/05/ethics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters angered by corruption should laud Nancy Pelosi's reforms (and beware a Republican restoration)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarity of thought is rare in both political press coverage and public opinion, but the reaction so far to the House ethics cases brought against Reps. Charles Rangel and Maxine Waters is well beyond average stupid.</p><p>According to <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2010/07/26/house-democrats-fret-over-rangel-case/">conventional media wisdom</a> -- always heavily influenced by&#160;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68Lzaw_lgPk&amp;feature=channel">Republican noisemakers</a> -- the Democrats <a href="http://newsok.com/swamp-gas/article/3482062">should expect to suffer</a> because two powerful committee chairs from their party are undergoing ethics investigations. But why should Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats take the blame when they brought reform that led to those investigations, regardless of the political consequences?</p><p>Yet, having thrown out the bums who tolerated corruption for so long under Republican leadership, the public is supposedly itching to throw out their replacements, who have reformed the House rules, created a new Office of Congressional Ethics, and handled every case impartially, as promised when the Democrats took over in January 2007. Voters have plenty of reasons to feel frustrated and angry this year, but ethics reform is not among them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred Barnes not on a team? Why did GOP pay him?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Weekly Standard editor claimed political purity in bashing Journolist, but he's on the Republican payroll]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the pages of the Wall Street Journal, Fred Barnes <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487046846045753883191313448.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">has lately lamented</a> the betrayal of "traditional journalism" by the liberal denizens of Journolist -- the defunct listserv that conservatives have used to revive the debate over "liberal media bias." His widely quoted Journal Op-Ed noted that before Journolist, neither liberal nor conservative journalists were likely to be "part of a team," and went on to add:</p><blockquote>
<p>"If there's a team, no one has asked me to join. As a conservative, I normally write more favorably about Republicans than Democrats and I routinely treat conservative ideas as superior to liberal ones. But I've never been part of a discussion with conservative writers about how we could most help the Republican or the conservative team."</p>
</blockquote><p>This assertion of political purity struck me as false, coming from a journalist who has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201004210012">appeared repeatedly</a> as a speaker at Republican Party events across the country -- a breach of the political boundaries of "traditional journalism" that few, if any, of the writers on Journolist, for example, would ever contemplate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Abramoff, Eliot Spitzer: A tale of two swindlers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino Jack and the United States of Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What connects the disgraced N.Y. governor and the jailed D.C. lobbyist? Oscar-winner Alex Gibney explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the following have in common: Imprisoned Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff, disgraced ex-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, the collapse of Enron, the Bush administration's torture policies, the late gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson? Before we go chasing some thread of thematic continuity -- and we could definitely do that -- let's observe the emotional connection. All of those people and things provoke or embody big, visceral reactions: shock, outrage, disgust, amazement.</p><p>The other thing they have in common, of course, is <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney,</a> who has made movies about all those subjects, including the Oscar-winner <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/04/30/tribeca_2">"Taxi to the Dark Side,"</a> the box-office breakthrough <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2005/04/21/enron/index.html">"Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room"</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2008/07/04/gibney_gonzo/index.html">"Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson,"</a> which wasn't a big hit but strikes me as a key work in understanding what Gibney is up to. He thrives on those oversize emotions mentioned above, channeling them into intentionally ambiguous pop documentaries that inhabit a nuanced middle ground between journalism and entertainment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/06/gibney_casino_jack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive Alex Gibney clip: Jack Abramoff and healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino Jack and the United States of Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/04/30/gibney_clip</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See a deleted scene from Oscar-winner Alex Gibney's new movie about the guy who dosed Congress with dirty money]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an exclusive premiere for Film Salon readers, here's a deleted scene from Oscar-winning director <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2008/01/18/conversations_gibney/">Alex Gibney's</a> upcoming documentary <a href="http://www.takepart.com/casinojack">"Casino Jack and the United States of Money."</a> The film recounts the horrifying, mesmerizing saga of &#252;ber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the congressional corruption scandal of the late '90s and early 2000s that dramatically changed the landscape of Washington (and definitely not for the better).</p><p>In this Webisode, Gibney explores the elaborate money shuffle through which Abramoff channeled money from supposedly legitimate lobbying clients (like Indian tribes) through Republican PACs and Big Pharma front groups, who in turn wrote industry-friendly legislation that was passed intact by the GOP-led Congress. I'll have an interview with Gibney and more coverage of the film next week. "Casino Jack and the United States of Money" opens May 7 in major cities, but you'll only find this clip here (at least until the DVD comes out).</p><p>
    <object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9S_DigsLilU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/gibney_clip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A wave of phony indignation over Charlie Rangel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/rangel_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/rangel_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/03/04/rangel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP leaders shrieking "Democrat corruption" -- like junket-loving John Boehner -- rarely worry much over ethics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Charlie Rangel has relinquished his coveted chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee and may be facing worse days ahead, his humiliation stands as a mark of ethical consistency for liberals and Democrats. A Korean War hero and a symbol of African-American advancement, the likeable Harlem pol was brought to book not by the Republicans who are celebrating, but chiefly by the "liberal" New York Times and the Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who voted to reprimand him.</p><p>The Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/nyregion/11rangel.html?_r=1">originally investigated</a> Rangel&#8217;s finances and fundraising and then published the stories that triggered the official ethics probe. The ethics committee, reorganized by Speaker Nancy Pelosi in 2007, ultimately did not shrink from admonishing one of the most powerful and senior Democrats in the House, and continues to examine other allegations against him. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington -- a watchdog group funded by Democratic donors -- twice named Rangel to its annual list of &#8220;most corrupt&#8221; members of Congress (which is always admirably bipartisan, unlike such lists maintained by CREW's conservative counterparts).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/rangel_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/rangel_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sundance: Searing portrait of a top lobbyist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/01/29/gibney_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar-winner Alex Gibney talks about his new Jack Abramoff expos]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PARK CITY, Utah -- Alex Gibney's new documentary, "Casino Jack and the United States of Money," which premiered at Sundance this week, is much more than a shocking and highly entertaining movie about Jack Abramoff, the &#252;ber-lobbyist at the center of the biggest corruption scandal in congressional history. It's a portrait of a political system that has been poisoned down to the root by the pernicious influence of big money, by the buying and selling of connections and influence, and by a radical free-market ideology that has been systematically employed to undermine the principles of representative democracy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/gibney_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DeLay: &#8220;No idea&#8221; if Obama&#8217;s a citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/07/delay_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/07/delay_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/07/delay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former House majority leader goes from "Dancing With the Stars" to the Birthers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former House Majority leader Tom DeLay needs something to keep him busy now that he's left the cast of "Dancing With the Stars" due to injury. So he's attaching himself to the Birthers -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/08/20/delay_birther/index.html">again.</a></p><p>Unofficial Birther headquarters WorldNetDaily is <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=112206">trumpeting</a> the news: In <a href="http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/popvox/archive/2009/10/07/tom-delay-explains-why-he-quit-dancing-with-the-stars.aspx">an interview</a> with the man once known as "The Hammer," Newsweek's Ramin Setoodeh pointed out, "You got into some trouble for saying on TV that you weren't sure President Obama was born in the United States." DeLay responded, "What I said was, to answer a question from Chris Matthews, I said: 'Why wouldn't the president of the United States show the American people his birth certificate?' You have to show a birth certificate to play Little League baseball. It's a question that should be answered. It's in the Constitution that you have to be a natural-born citizen of the United States to be president."</p><p>Seetodeh followed up by asking, "Do you think he isn't a citizen?"</p><p>"I have no idea," DeLay answered.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/07/delay_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/07/delay_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delay: &#8220;Republicans are leaderless&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/delay_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/delay_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/23/delay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former House Majority Whip bemoans the current state of his party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay knows an opportunity when he sees one -- and not just an opportunity to do a little ballroom dancing. And he believes he's spotted one for the Republican Party in the current political environment. But there's a problem.</p><p>"The Republican Party doesn't have the organization or leadership to take advantage of this dire political situation that Obama is in now. We have these grassroots sprouting up, but not the party organization to use them," the man known as "The Hammer" <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/09/22/dancing-tom-delay-on-infighting-in-the-leaderless-gop-even-r/">told</a> Politics Daily. "Republicans are leaderless ... It's all the same old guys who were in leadership with me, and those old guys aren't the leaders the party needs."</p><p>Delay also offered some thoughts on healthcare reform, saying he believes the current Democratic plans are unconstitutional:</p><blockquote>
<p>The federal government doesn't have the authority to mandate small businesses .... The only way any of this health care could be constitutional would be if the government allowed interstate choice so people could choose health care policies from any of the 50 states.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/delay_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/delay_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dancing with Tom DeLay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/delay_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/delay_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/08/17/delay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former House majority leader heads to reality television]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long ago, Tom DeLay was one of the most powerful men in Congress, if not the whole United States. As House majority leader, he ruled with an iron fist, and established the kind of party discipline today's congressional leadership can only dream of -- at least, until he was indicted.</p><p>Now, DeLay's going to be back in the spotlight, albeit one of an entirely different sort. He'll be on the next season of the "celebrity" reality show "Dancing With the Stars," along with fellow luminaries like Donny Osmond, Kelly Osbourne, Melissa Joan Hart and Michael Irvin.</p><p>The show's executive producer, Conrad Green, <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2009/08/17/dancing-with-the-stars-season-9-cast-tom-delay/">told</a> Entertainment Weekly, "We usually throw a few Hail Marys every season to people we don&#8217;t think are gonna say yes, but we think, <em>oh, why not ask him</em>. Occasionally, they come off. As it turns out, Tom DeLay likes to do a bit of the Two Step, he likes dancing with his wife. His daughter is a country dancing champion, I believe .... Now I don&#8217;t know whether that translates into him being the next Mario Lopez on the dance floor, but I think he&#8217;s gonna come into it with a big smile on his face and probably surprise a lot of people cause he&#8217;s gonna embrace it so much.&#8221;</p><p>Even if DeLay turns out to be the world's best dancer, going from House majority leader to being compared -- not in a wholly favorable way -- to someone best known for starring in "Saved By the Bell" is not exactly the dream career trajectory for most politicians.</p><p>(Hat-tip to <a href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/08/17/the-wonders-of-american-democracy/">Michael Scherer.</a>)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/delay_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/delay_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep on whining, Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/07/lyons_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/07/lyons_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/05/07/lyons</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more the GOP complains, the better Obama looks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A funny thing happened on the way to the Tea Party. The more furiously the party out of power denounces President Obama, the more confident Americans appear to be that voters made a wise decision last November. That would be the Republican Party. Remember them?</p><p>Every time you turn on the television, some Republican is ranting like the kind of barstool know-it-all who gives booze a bad name. Recently it was Tom DeLay, explaining to MSNBC's Chris Matthews that Texas might leave the United States to avoid (imaginary) tax increases. And here I thought the Dallas Cowboys were "America's Team."</p><p>After first giving us George W. Bush, then impugning the patriotism of anybody who thought invading Iraq was a bad idea, the Texas Knothead faction loses an election, and then talks secession. DeLay was making it up as he went along, claiming the Obama administration seeks "50 percent to 60 percent tax rates on American citizens." In reality, it seeks a 39.6 percent rate on yearly income over $250,000, tax cuts for everybody else.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/07/lyons_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/07/lyons_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving the center to the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/31/sirota_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/31/sirota_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/01/31/sirota</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as Republican congressmen moved President Bush to the right, so Washington's Democrats are now pushing Obama to the left. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they write their retrospectives about the era that ended with the 2008 election, economic historians will undoubtedly credit George W. Bush with almost single-handedly moving the country to embrace extremist conservatism. It&#8217;s a simple storyline: Cowboy president drives bewildered American herd over laissez-faire cliff. What such reductionism will ignore, though, is what we must remember now: namely, that Congress also played a decisive role in the stampede.</p><p>As former House Republican leader Tom DeLay said, he and his colleagues deliberately started &#8220;every policy initiative from as far to the political right&#8221; as possible, so as to shift &#8220;the center further to the right.&#8221; The formula emulated Franklin Roosevelt&#8217;s fabled admonishment to allies: &#8220;I agree with you, I want to do it, now make me do it.&#8221;</p><p>With Bush, congressional Republicans knew they had an ideological comrade in the White House. But they also knew he was confined by the (minimally) moderating desire for reelection and the (even more minimally) moderating limits of his national office. So, to reach their goals, conservatives had to compel their presidential friend to do what they wanted -- and compel him they did. When Bush&#8217;s tax cuts and deregulatory schemes hit the Capitol, Republicans inevitably expanded them to fully achieve the right&#8217;s objectives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/31/sirota_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/31/sirota_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gimme a D for Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/27/texas_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/27/texas_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn, R-Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Tex.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/feature/2009/01/26/texas</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas used to run Washington. Now Bush is the latest Texas politician to be run out of Washington. The quickest path back to power may lie in accepting demographic reality.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Time magazine notes, when George W. Bush went back to Texas last week, he found <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1873143,00.html?imw=Y">a divided state Republican Party</a>. Well-coifed incumbent governor Rick Perry faces an intraparty challenge from Kay Bailey Hutchison, who plans to leave the U.S. Senate before the end of her current term to battle Perry for the 2010 GOP gubernatorial nomination.</p><p>What Time does not explain, however, is that Bush has returned to <a href="http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/11/25/as-latinos-tilt-democratic-can-texas-stay-%e2%80%98red%e2%80%99/">a state far different</a> from the one he left eight years ago. A rapid rise in the Latino electorate promises to turn the state purple in the foreseeable future, and the Republicans have lost seats in the state legislature in each of the last three election cycles. But more importantly, having placed all its chips on the wrong party, in 2009 the state has ceded nearly all of its national influence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/27/texas_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/27/texas_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How conservative greed and corruption destroyed American politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/07/frank_wrecking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/07/frank_wrecking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/08/07/frank_wrecking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abramoff, DeLay, Norquist, oh my! The spectacular misrule of the GOP was not an accident.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington is the city where the scandals happen. Every American knows this, but we also believe, if only vaguely, that the really monumental scandals are a thing of the past, that the golden age of misgovernment-for-profit ended with the cavalry charge and the robber barons, at about the same time presidents stopped wearing beards. </p><p> I moved to Washington in 2003, just in time for the comeback, for the hundred-year flood. At first it was only a trickle in the basement, a little stream released accidentally by the president's friends at Enron. Before long, though, the levees were failing all over town, and the city was inundated with a muddy torrent of graft. </p><p> How are we to dissect a deluge like this one? We might begin by categorizing the earmarks handed out by Congress, sorting the foolish earmarks from the costly earmarks from the earmarks made strictly on a cash basis. We could try a similar approach to government contracting: the no-bid contracts, the no-oversight contracts, the no-experience contracts, the contracts handed out to friends of the vice president. We might consider the shoplifting career of one of the president's former domestic policy advisors or the habitual plagiarism of the president's liaison to the Christian right. And we would certainly have to find some way to parse the extraordinary incompetence of the executive branch, incompetence so fulsome and steady and reliable that at some point Americans stopped being surprised and began simply to count on it, to think of incompetence as the way government works. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/07/frank_wrecking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/07/frank_wrecking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/quote_37/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/quote_37/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/01/18/quote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom DeLay's really big threat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"If McCain gets the nomination, I don't know what I'll do. I might have to sit this one out." -- Former House Majority Leader <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/mccain-hit-by-hammer-on-the-hill-2008-01-18.html">Tom DeLay</a>, under indictment in Texas, on the role he might not play in 2008. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/quote_37/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/18/quote_37/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

