<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > TomDispatch.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tomdispatch_com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:49:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>National Intelligence Council: U.S. is a &#8220;global security provider&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Intelligence Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The center's new "Global Trends 2030" offers a predictably myopic view of America's future place in the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it as a simple formula: if you’ve been hired (and paid handsomely) to protect what is, you’re going to be congenitally ill-equipped to imagine what might be.  And yet the urge not just to know the contours of the future, but to plant the Stars and Stripes in that future has had the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) in its grip since the mid-1990s.  That was the moment when it first <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175336/tomgram%3A_engelhardt,_war_is_a_drug/" target="_blank">occurred</a> to some in Washington that U.S. power might be capable of controlling just about everything worth the bother globally for, if not an eternity, then long enough to make the future American property.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Addressing global warming: Earth&#8217;s New Year&#8217;s resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/addressing_global_warming_earths_new_years_resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/addressing_global_warming_earths_new_years_resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is no longer an issue for environmentalists. Our children's lives are at stake, and it's time to act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this wild year comes to an end, we return to the season of gifts. Here’s the gift you’re not going to get soon: any conventional version of Paradise. You know, the place where nothing much happens and nothing is demanded of you. The gifts you’ve already been given in 2012 include a struggle over the <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719" target="_blank">fate of the Earth</a>. This is probably not exactly what you asked for, and I wish it were otherwise -- but to do good work, to be necessary, to have something to give: these are the true gifts. And at least there’s still a struggle ahead of us, not just doom and despair.<br /> <a name="more"></a><br /> Think of 2013 as the Year Zero in the battle over climate change, one in which we are going to have to win big, or lose bigger.  This is a terrible thing to say, but not as terrible as the reality that you can see in footage of glaciers vanishing, images of the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/science/july-dec12/greenland_07-25.html" target="_blank">entire surface</a> of the Greenland Ice Shield <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/greenland-melt.html" target="_blank">melting</a> this summer, <a href="http://grist.org/news/the-16-scariest-maps-from-the-e-u-s-massive-new-climate-change-report/" target="_blank">maps</a> of Europe’s future in which just being in southern Europe when the heat hits will be catastrophic, let alone in more equatorial realms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/addressing_global_warming_earths_new_years_resolution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/addressing_global_warming_earths_new_years_resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a showdown brewing between Israel and the U.S.?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/is_a_showdown_brewing_between_israel_and_the_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/is_a_showdown_brewing_between_israel_and_the_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publicly, Obama is still offering Netanyahu his full support. Behind the scenes, his policies are less predictable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the question no one is asking as 2012 ends, especially given the effusive public support the Obama administration offered Israel in its recent conflict with Hamas in Gaza: Will 2013 be a year of confrontation between Washington and Jerusalem?  It’s on no one’s agenda for the New Year. But it could happen anyway.</p><p>It’s true that the Israeli-Palestinian peace process appears dead in the water. No matter how much Barack Obama might have wanted that prize, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rebuffed him at every turn.  The president appears to have taken it on the chin, offering more than the usual support for Israel and in return getting <em>kloom </em>(as they say in Hebrew).  Nothing at all.</p><p>However, the operative word here is “appears.” In foreign affairs what you see -- a show carefully scripted for political purposes -- often bears little relation to what you actually get.</p><p>While the Obama administration has acceded to the imagery of knee-jerk support for whatever Israel does, no matter how outrageous, behind the scenes its policies are beginning to look far less predictable. In fact, unlikely as it may seem, a showdown could be brewing between the two countries. If so, the outcome will depend on a complicated interplay between private diplomacy and public theater.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/is_a_showdown_brewing_between_israel_and_the_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/is_a_showdown_brewing_between_israel_and_the_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Torture: America&#8217;s other national pastime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/torture_americas_other_national_pastime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/torture_americas_other_national_pastime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't let "Zero Dark Thirty" fool you. The suffering we inflict is psychological -- and has lasting consequences]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look backward you see a nightmare. If you look forward you become the nightmare.</p><p>There’s one particular nightmare that Americans need to face: in the first decade of the twenty-first century we tortured people as national policy. One day, we’re going to have to confront the reality of what that meant, of what effect it had on its victims and on us, too, we who condoned, supported, or at least allowed it to happen, either passively or with guilty (or guiltless) gusto. If not, torture won’t go away. It can’t be disappeared like the body of a political prisoner, or conveniently deep-sixed simply by wishing it elsewhere or pretending it never happened or closing our bureaucratic eyes. After the fact, torture can only be dealt with by staring directly into the nightmare that changed us -- that, like it or not, helped make us who we now are.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/torture_americas_other_national_pastime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/torture_americas_other_national_pastime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Intelligence emerges from the shadows</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guatemala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's covert wars continue, but on a far grander scale than we ever could have imagined a generation ago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren’t those the greatest of days if you were in the American spy game?  Governments went down in Guatemala and Iran thanks to you.  In distant Indonesia, Laos, and Vietnam, what a role you played!  And even that botch-up of an invasion in Cuba was nothing to sneeze at.  In those days, unfortunately, you -- particularly those of you in the CIA -- didn’t get the credit you deserved.</p><p>You had to live privately with your successes.  Sometimes, as with the Bay of Pigs, the failures came back to haunt you (so, in the <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175267/stephan_kinzer_BP_in_the_Gulf" target="_blank">case of Iran</a>, would your “success,” though so many years later), but you couldn’t with pride talk publicly about what you, in your secret world, had done, or see instant movies and TV shows about your triumphs.  You couldn’t launch a “covert” air war that was reported on, generally positively, almost every week, or bask in the pleasure of having your director <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/cia-chief-drones-only-game-in-town-for-stopping-al-qaeda/" target="_blank">claim</a> publicly that it was “the only game in town.”  You couldn’t, that is, come out of what were then called “the shadows,” and soak up the glow of attention, be hailed as a hero, join Americans in watching some (fantasy) version of your efforts weekly on television, or get the credit for anything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s community organizing: Occupy the globe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the onset of the Global War on Terror, the US has spent trillions on bases in countries you'd never expect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Are you monitoring the construction?” asked the middle-aged man on a bike accompanied by his dog.</p><p>“<em>Ah, sì</em>,” I replied in my barely passable Italian.</p><p>“<em>Bene</em>,” he answered. Good.</p><p>In front of us, a backhoe’s guttural engine whined into action and empty dump trucks rattled along a dirt track. The shouts of men vied for attention with the metallic whirring of drills and saws ringing in the distance. Nineteen immense cranes spread across the landscape, with the foothills of Italy’s Southern Alps in the background. More than 100 pieces of earthmoving equipment, 250 workers, and grids of scaffolding wrapped around what soon would be 34 new buildings.</p><p>We were standing in front of a massive 145-acre construction site for a “little America” rising in <a href="http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/712" target="_blank">Vicenza</a>, an architecturally renowned Italian city and UNESCO world heritage site near Venice. This was <a href="http://www.stripes.com/news/construction-booming-at-vicenza-1.96914" target="_blank">Dal Molin</a>, the new military base the U.S. Army has been readying for the relocation of as many as 2,000 soldiers from Germany in 2013.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/obamas_community_organizing_occupy_the_globe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The War on Drugs is a war on human nature</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_war_on_drugs_is_a_war_on_human_nature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_war_on_drugs_is_a_war_on_human_nature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Paine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's been fighting this battle for decades. It can't be won, and it's costing us upwards of $20 billion a year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question that tempts mankind to the use of substances controlled and uncontrolled is next of kin to Hamlet’s: to be, or not to be, someone or somewhere else. Escape from a grievous circumstance or the shambles of an unwanted self, the hope of finding at a higher altitude a new beginning or a better deal. Fly me to the moon, and let me play among the stars; give me leave to drown my sorrow in a quart of gin; wine, dear boy, and truth.</p><p>That the consummations of the wish to shuffle off the mortal coil are as old as the world itself was the message brought by Abraham Lincoln to an Illinois temperance society in 1842. “I have not inquired at what period of time the use of intoxicating liquors commenced,” he said, “nor is it important to know.” It is sufficient to know that on first opening our eyes “upon the stage of existence,” we found “intoxicating liquor recognized by everybody, used by everybody, repudiated by nobody.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_war_on_drugs_is_a_war_on_human_nature/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_war_on_drugs_is_a_war_on_human_nature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t hold your breath for bilateral discussions with Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_hold_your_breath_for_bilateral_discussions_with_iran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_hold_your_breath_for_bilateral_discussions_with_iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between pressures from Israel, the Pentagon and Washington elites, the nation will likely remain Obama's top threat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Election 2012’s theatre-of-the-absurd “foreign policy” debate, Iran came up no less than <a href="http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/10/22/which_country_was_mentioned_most_at_the_foreign_policy_debate" target="_blank">47 times</a>. Despite all the fear, loathing, <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175612/tomgram%3A_jeremiah_goulka,_the_urge_to_bomb_iran/" target="_blank">threats</a>, and lies in that billionaire’s circus of a campaign season, Americans were nonetheless offered virtually nothing substantial about Iran, although its (non-existent) WMDs were relentlessly hawked as the top U.S. national security issue. (The world was, however, astonished to learn from candidate Romney that Syria, not the Persian Gulf, was that country’s “<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/romney-wont-give-on-iran-syria-route-to-the-sea/2012/10/23/690639c0-1d1d-11e2-ba31-3083ca97c314_blog.html" target="_blank">route to the sea</a>.”)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_hold_your_breath_for_bilateral_discussions_with_iran/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_hold_your_breath_for_bilateral_discussions_with_iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Barack: Stop terrorizing the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An open letter to the president to end his lethal -- and ever-expanding -- drone wars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama<br /> The White House<br /> 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW<br /> Washington, D.C. 20500</p><p>Dear President Obama,</p><p>Nothing you don’t know, but let me just say it: the world’s a weird place. In my younger years, I might have said “crazy,” but that was back when I thought being crazy was a cool thing and only regretted I wasn’t.</p><p>I mean, do you ever think about how you ended up where you are? And I'm not actually talking about the Oval Office, though <em>that’s</em> undoubtedly a weird enough story in its own right.</p><p>After all, you were a community organizer and a constitutional law professor and now, if you stop to think about it, here’s where you’ve ended up: you’re using robots to <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175551/engelhardt_assassin-in-chief" target="_blank">assassinate</a> people you personally pick as targets.  You’ve overseen and escalated off-the-books robot air wars in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/29/americas-drone-campaign-terror" target="_blank">Pakistan</a>, <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/08/somalia-drones/all/" target="_blank">Somalia</a>, and <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/09/yemen-drone-war/" target="_blank">Yemen</a>, and are evidently considering <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/white-house-secret-meetings-examine-al-qaeda-threat-in-north-africa/2012/10/01/f485b9d2-0bdc-11e2-bd1a-b868e65d57eb_story.html" target="_blank">expanding them</a> to Mali and maybe even <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/ondeadline/2012/10/15/libya-drones-special-forces-al-qaeda/1635181/" target="_blank">Libya</a>.  You’ve employed what will someday be defined as a weapon of mass destruction, launching history’s first <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175607/karen_greenberg_a_digital_9.11" target="_blank">genuine cyberwar</a> against a country that isn’t threatening to attack us.  You’ve agreed to the surveillance of <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175524/engelhardt_datamining_you" target="_blank">more Americans</a> every which way from Sunday than have ever been listened in on or (given emailing, texting, and tweeting) read.  You came into office proclaiming a “<a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20090121/index.htm" target="_blank">sunshine</a>” policy and yet your administration has classified more documents (<a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175570/engelhardt_that_makes_no_sense" target="_blank">92,064,862</a> in 2011) than any other in our history.  Despite <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/11/president-obama-signs-law-upgrading-whistleblower-protections" target="_blank">signing</a> a Whistleblower Enhancement Protection Act, you’ve <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175500/peter_van_buren_fear_the_silence" target="_blank">used</a> the Espionage Act on more government whistleblowers and leakers than all previous administrations combined, and yet your officials continue to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html" target="_blank">leak</a> secret material they see as advantageous to the White House without fear of prosecution.  Though you <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175057/ira_chernus_gwot_rip" target="_blank">deep-sixed</a> the Bush administration name for it -- “the Global War on Terror” (ridding the world of GWOT, one of the worst acronyms ever) -- you’ve accepted the idea that we are “at war” with terror and on a “global battlefield” which (see above) you’re actually expanding.  You’re <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/some-guantanamo-bay-detainees-names-disclosed/2012/09/21/e3611e76-0434-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_story.html" target="_blank">still keeping</a> uncharged, untried prisoners of not-quite-war in an offshore military prison camp of injustice that, on the day you came into office, you <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/203727-obama-promise-to-close-prison-at-guantanamo-still-unfulfilled" target="_blank">promised</a> to close within a year.  You’re overseeing planning that, according to recent reports, will continue the Afghan War in some form until at least <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/world/asia/us-planning-a-force-to-stay-in-afghanistan.html" target="_blank">2017</a> or possibly <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2012/11/29/panetta-us-will-battle-al-qaeda-in-afghanistan-for-years-to-come/" target="_blank">well beyond</a>.  You preside over an administration that has encouraged the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-blurring-of-cia-and-military/2011/05/31/AGsLhkGH_story.html" target="_blank">further militarization</a> of the CIA (to which you <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/petraeus_13/" target="_blank">appointed</a> as director not a civilian but a four-star general you assumedly wanted to tuck safely away during campaign season).  You’ve overseen the further <a href="http://wemeantwell.com/blog/2012/08/13/the-militarization-of-the-state-department/" target="_blank">militarization</a> of the State Department; you’ve encouraged a <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175426/nick_turse_a_secret_war_in_120_countries" target="_blank">major expansion</a> of the <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175547/andrew_bacevich_the_golden_age_of_special_operations" target="_blank">special operations forces</a> and its secret presidential army, the Joint Special Operations Command, cocooned inside the U.S. military/  You’ve overseen the further post-9/11 expansion of an already <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175545/" target="_blank">staggering</a> national security budget and the further growth of our labyrinthine “Intelligence Community” -- and though who remembers anymore, you even won what must have been the first <em>prospective</em> Nobel Prize for Peace more or less before you did a damn thing, and then thanked the Nobel Committee with a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/barack-obamas-oslo-speech_b_389791.html" target="_blank">full-throated defense</a> of the right of the U.S. to do what it pleased, militarily, on the planet! And if that isn’t a weird legacy-in-formation, what is?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austerity: The real &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Carey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current "debtpocalypse" is just the last installment in the tragic dispossession of America's working class]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/us/fiscal-cliff-slope-debtpocalypse-it-means-austerity.html" target="_blank">Debtpocalypse</a>” looms.  Depending on who wins out in Washington, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/us/fiscal-cliff-slope-debtpocalypse-it-means-austerity.html" target="_blank">we’re told</a>, we will either free fall over the fiscal cliff or take a terrifying slide to the pit at the bottom.  Grim as these scenarios might seem, there is something confected about the <em>mise-en-scène</em>, like an un-fun Playland.  After all, there is <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175615/tomgram%3A_kramer_and_hellman,_it%27s_the_politics,_stupid/" target="_blank">no fiscal cliff</a>, or at least there was none -- until the two parties built it.</p><p>And yet the pit exists.  It goes by the name of “austerity.” However, it didn’t just appear in time for the last election season or the lame-duck session of Congress to follow.  It was dug more than a generation ago, and has been getting wider and deeper ever since.  Millions of people have long made it their home.  “Debtpocalypse” is merely the latest installment in a tragic, 40-year-old story of the dispossession of American working people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/austerity_the_real_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we stop worshipping American generals now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gen. Stanley McChrystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those devastated by Petraeus' fall from grace, here's a newsflash: We enabled him with our sycophancy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few things have characterized the post-9/11 American world more than our worshipful embrace of our generals. They’ve become our heroes, our sports stars, and our celebrities all rolled into one. We can’t stop <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174924/engelhardt_falling_upwards" target="_blank">gushing about them</a>. Even after his recent <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175619" target="_blank">fall from grace</a>, General David Petraeus was still being celebrated by CNN as the best American general <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/10/opinion/bergen-petraeus-legacy/index.html" target="_blank">since Dwight D. Eisenhower</a> (and let’s not forget that Ike commanded the largest amphibious invasion in history and held a fractious coalition together in a total war against Nazi Germany). Before <em>his</em> fall from grace, Afghan War Commander General Stanley McChrystal was similarly lauded as <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5344967n" target="_blank">one tough customer</a>, a sort of <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175074/the_pressure_of_an_expanding_war" target="_blank">superman-saint</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/can_we_stop_worshipping_american_generals_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World Energy Report&#8217;s scariest findings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_world_energy_reports_scariest_findings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_world_energy_reports_scariest_findings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[An Inconvenient Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Energy Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. may surpass Saudi Arabia as the planet's leading oil producer -- and the cost could be catastrophic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rarely does the release of a data-driven report on energy trends trigger front-page headlines around the world.  That, however, is exactly what happened on November 12th when the prestigious Paris-based <a href="http://www.iea.org/" target="_blank">International Energy Agency</a> (IEA) released this year’s edition of its <em>World Energy Outlook</em>.  In the process, just about everyone missed its real news, which should have set off alarm bells across the planet.<br /> <a name="more"></a><br /> Claiming that advances in drilling technology were producing an upsurge in North American energy output, <em>World Energy Outlook</em> predicted that the United States would overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the planet’s leading oil producer by 2020.  “North America is at the forefront of a sweeping transformation in oil and gas production that will affect all regions of the world,” <a href="http://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/pressreleases/2012/november/name,33015,en.html" target="_blank">declared</a> IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven in a widely quoted statement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_world_energy_reports_scariest_findings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_world_energy_reports_scariest_findings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 chilling testimonies from occupied Palestine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/6_chilling_testimonies_from_occupied_palestine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/6_chilling_testimonies_from_occupied_palestine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ehud Barak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israeli veterans speak out about the realities of their country's military policies in Gaza and other territories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“There is no country on Earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders,” President Barack Obama said at a press conference last week. He drew on this general observation in order to justify Operation Pillar of Defense, Israel’s most recent military campaign in the Gaza Strip. In describing the situation this way, he assumes, like many others, that Gaza is a political entity external and independent of Israel. This is not so. It is true that Israel officially disengaged from the Gaza Strip in August 2005, withdrawing its ground troops and evacuating the Israeli settlements there. But despite the absence of a permanent ground presence, Israel has maintained a crushing control over Gaza from that moment until today.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/6_chilling_testimonies_from_occupied_palestine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/6_chilling_testimonies_from_occupied_palestine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petraeus: American decline writ small</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former general was once billed as the man who could save Iraq. Maybe that's why his downfall feels so symbolic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History, it is said, arrives first as tragedy, then as farce.  First as Karl Marx, then as the Marx Brothers.  In the case of twenty-first century America, history arrived first as George W. Bush (and Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith and the Project for a New America -- a shadow government <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175336/tomgram%3A_engelhardt,_war_is_a_drug/" target="_blank">masquerading</a> as a think tank -- and an assorted crew of ambitious neocons and neo-pundits); only later did David Petraeus make it onto the scene.</p><p>It couldn’t be clearer now that, from the <a href="http://cdn.ph.upi.com/sv/i/para/upi/UPI-6291353014900/2012/3/13530173326368/Shirtless-FBI-agent-unmasked-PHOTO.jpg" target="_blank">shirtless FBI agent</a> to the “<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/broadwells-bio-says-embedded-with-petraeus/2012/11/12/7a0c8a8c-2cd9-11e2-a99d-5c4203af7b7a_blog.html" target="_blank">embedded</a>”<strong> </strong>biographer and the <a href="http://www.starztrax.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/nypost1.jpg" target="_blank">“other other woman,”</a> the “fall” of David Petraeus is playing out as farce of the first order.  What’s less obvious is that Petraeus, America’s military golden boy and <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174924/engelhardt_falling_upwards" target="_blank">Caesar of celebrity</a>, was always smoke and mirrors, always the farce, even if the denizens of Washington didn’t know it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s secret fracking war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/americas_secret_fracking_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/americas_secret_fracking_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It might not get as much media attention as the conflict in Afghanistan, but its stakes could be infinitely higher]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s a war going on that you know nothing about between a coalition of great powers and a small insurgent movement.  It’s a secret war being waged in the shadows while you go about your everyday life.</p><p>In the end, this conflict may matter more than those in Iraq and Afghanistan ever did.  And yet it’s taking place far from newspaper front pages and with hardly a notice on the nightly news.  Nor is it being fought in Yemen or Pakistan or Somalia, but in small hamlets in upstate New York.  There, a loose network of activists is waging a guerrilla campaign not with improvised explosive devices or rocket-propelled grenades, but with zoning ordinances and petitions.</p><p>The weaponry may be humdrum, but the stakes couldn’t be higher. Ultimately, the fate of the planet may hang in the balance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/americas_secret_fracking_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/americas_secret_fracking_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s nation-building hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all the talk of starting at home, the US is still pouring billions into the Middle East. When will it stop?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A billion dollars from the federal government: that kind of money could go a long way toward revitalizing a country’s aging infrastructure.  It could provide housing or better water and sewer systems.  It could enhance a transportation network or develop an urban waterfront.  It could provide local jobs.  It could do any or all of these things.  And, in fact, it did.  It just happened to be in the Middle East, not the United States.</p><p>The Pentagon awarded $667.2 million in contracts in 2012, and more than $1 billion during Barack Obama’s first term in office for construction projects in largely autocratic Middle Eastern nations, according to figures provided to TomDispatch by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Middle East District (USACE-MED).  More than $178 million in similar funding is already anticipated for 2013.  These contracts represent a mix of projects, including expanding and upgrading military bases used by U.S. troops in the region, building facilities for indigenous security forces, and launching infrastructure projects meant to improve the lives of local populations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/americas_nation_building_hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four more years &#8212; of gridlock!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13070971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six billion dollars of campaign spending later, America is right back where it started]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fall of 1948, Harry Truman barnstormed the country by train, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1948#General_election" target="_blank">repeatedly bashing</a> a “do-nothing Congress,” and so snatched victory from the jaws of <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HemMnHs7SCg/TNNNmocp1cI/AAAAAAAAAmc/kMSFG2loNtQ/s320/dewey-truman-1948.jpg" target="_blank">defeat</a> in that year’s presidential campaign.  This year, neither presidential candidate focused on blasting a do-nothing Congress or, in Obama’s case, “Republican obstructionism,” demanding that the voters give them a legislative body that would mean an actual mandate for change.</p><p>We now know the results of such a campaign and, after all the tumult and the nation’s first <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/10/2012-election-spending-will-reach-6.html" target="_blank">$6 billion election</a>, they couldn’t be more familiar.  Only days later, you can watch a remarkably recognizable cast of characters from the reelected president and Speaker of the House John Boehner to the massed pundits of the mainstream media picking up the pages of a well-thumbed script.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s not falling off a &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/americas_not_falling_off_a_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/americas_not_falling_off_a_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't let the headlines drive you crazy. The U.S. economy isn't headed for a double-dip recession]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don’t call it the "cliff” for nothing.  It’s the fiscal spot where a nation’s representatives can gather and cry doom.  It’s the place -- if Washington is to be believed -- where, with a single leap into the Abyss of Sequestration, those representatives can end it all for the rest of us.</p><p>In the wake of President Obama’s electoral victory, that cliff (if you’ll excuse a mixed metaphor or two) is about to step front and center. The only problem: the odds are no one will leap, and remarkably little of note will actually happen.  But since the headlines are about to scream “crisis,” what you need to understand American politics in the coming weeks of the lame-duck Congress is a little guide to reality, some Cliff Notes for Washington.</p><p>As a start, relax.  Don’t let the headlines get to you.  There’s little reason for anyone to lose sleep over the much-hyped <a href="http://nationalpriorities.org/analysis/2012/what-fiscal-cliff-resources-bush-tax-cuts-sequestration-and-lame-duck-congress/" target="_blank">fiscal cliff</a>.  In fact, if you were choosing an image based on the coming fiscal dust-up, it probably wouldn’t be a cliff but an <a href="http://www.epi.org/publication/ib338-fiscal-cliff-obstacle-course/" target="_blank">obstacle course</a> -- a series of federal spending cuts and tax increases all scheduled to take effect as 2013 begins. And it’s true that, if all those budget cuts and tax increases were to go into effect at the same time, an already weak recovery would probably sink into a double-dip recession.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/americas_not_falling_off_a_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/americas_not_falling_off_a_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond battleships and bayonets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/beyond_battleships_and_bayonets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/beyond_battleships_and_bayonets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayonets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battleships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber-attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Warfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Space -- cyber and outer -- is the future frontier of the U.S. military. What kind of warfare will it yield?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s 2025 and an American “triple canopy” of advanced surveillance and armed drones fills the heavens from the lower- to the exo-atmosphere.  A wonder of the modern age, it can deliver its weaponry anywhere on the planet with staggering speed, knock out an enemy’s satellite communications system, or follow individuals biometrically for great distances.  Along with the country’s advanced cyberwar capacity, it’s also the most sophisticated militarized information system ever created and an insurance policy for U.S. global dominion deep into the twenty-first century.  It’s the future as the Pentagon imagines it; it’s under development; and Americans know nothing about it.</p><p>They are still operating in another age.  “Our Navy is smaller now than at any time since 1917,” <a href="http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=october-22-2012-the-third-obama-romney-presidential-debate" target="_blank">complained</a> Republican candidate Mitt Romney during the last presidential debate.</p><p><a name="more"></a><br /> With words of withering mockery, President Obama shot back: “Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed... the question is not a game of Battleship, where we're counting ships. It's what are our capabilities.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/beyond_battleships_and_bayonets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/beyond_battleships_and_bayonets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today could determine the future of the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/today_could_determine_the_future_of_the_planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/today_could_determine_the_future_of_the_planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy is the latest reminder that climate change is our biggest threat -- one our leadership can't ignore]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first horseman was named al-Qaeda in Manhattan, and it came as a message on September 11, 2001: that our meddling in the Middle East had sown rage and funded madness. We had meddled because of imperial ambition and because of oil, the black gold that fueled most of our machines and our largest corporations and too many of our politicians. The second horseman came not quite four years later. It was named Katrina, and this one too delivered a warning.</p><p>Katrina’s message was that we needed to face the dangers we had turned our back on when the country became obsessed with terrorism: failing infrastructure, institutional rot, racial divides, and poverty. And larger than any of these was the climate -- the heating oceans breeding stronger storms, melting the ice and raising the sea level, breaking the patterns of the weather we had always had into sharp shards: burning and dying forests, floods, droughts, heat waves in January, freak blizzards, sudden oscillations, acidifying oceans.<br /> <a name="more"></a><br /> The third horseman came in October of 2008: it was named Wall Street, and when that horseman stumbled and collapsed, we were reminded that it had always been a predator, and all that had changed was the scale -- of deregulation, of greed, of recklessness, of amorality about homes and lives being casually trashed to profit the already wealthy. And the fourth horseman has arrived on schedule.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/today_could_determine_the_future_of_the_planet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/today_could_determine_the_future_of_the_planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>