<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > topless protests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/topless_protests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina doesn&#8217;t want to see your breasts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/ladies_north_carolina_doesnt_want_to_see_your_breasts_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/ladies_north_carolina_doesnt_want_to_see_your_breasts_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topless protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to topless protests, GOP legislators introduced a bill asking Tar Heel women to cover up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in North Carolina want to outlaw showing your breasts in public--and it appears that a bill to do just that is headed for approval in the North Carolina legislature.<br /> <a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a></p><p>The <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news%2Fpolitics&amp;id=8991671"><em>Associated Press </em>reports</a> that the bill, which is headed to a floor vote, would change the state’s definition of “private parts” to include “the nipple, or any portion of the areola, or the female breast.” The bill stipulates that the punishment a woman receives if she exposes her breasts depends on why the woman did so. “Depending on whether such exposure is judged to be ‘for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire,’ the woman could be charged with a felony, punishable by up to six months in prison for first-time offenders. More mundane exposure would be a misdemeanor meriting up to 30 days in jail,” the <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news%2Fpolitics&amp;id=8991671">AP reports.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/ladies_north_carolina_doesnt_want_to_see_your_breasts_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/ladies_north_carolina_doesnt_want_to_see_your_breasts_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
