<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Trent Franks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/trent_franks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CBO says GOP abortion bill would raise the deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/cbo_says_gop_abortion_bill_would_raise_the_deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/cbo_says_gop_abortion_bill_would_raise_the_deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal deficits would increase by an estimated $75 million between 2014 and 2018, according to the CBO]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bill pushed by conservative Republicans in the House, which would restrict abortions after 20 weeks, would also raise the deficit by increasing Medicaid costs, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/abortion-bill-deficit-93574.html">Politico</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The Congressional Budget Office, which judges the budgetary impact of all legislation, says “Depending on the number of additional births under H.R. 1797, such Medicaid costs could range from about $75 million over the next 10 years to more than $400 million over that period.”</p> <p>CBO officially estimates that the bill increases federal deficits by $75 million between 2014 and 2018, and $225 million between 2014 and 2023.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/cbo_says_gop_abortion_bill_would_raise_the_deficit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/cbo_says_gop_abortion_bill_would_raise_the_deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House passes sweeping anti-abortion bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation would restrict almost all abortions to the first 20 weeks after conception]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-led House on Tuesday passed a far-reaching anti-abortion bill that conservatives saw as a milestone in their 40-year campaign against legalized abortion and Democrats characterized as yet another example of a GOP war on women.</p><p>The legislation, sparked by the murder conviction of a Philadelphia late-term abortion provider, would restrict almost all abortions to the first 20 weeks after conception, defying laws in most states that allow abortions up to when the fetus becomes viable, usually considered to be around 24 weeks.</p><p>It mirrors 20-week abortion ban laws passed by some states, and lays further groundwork for the ongoing legal battle that abortion foes hope will eventually result in forcing the Supreme Court to reconsider the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, that made abortion legal.</p><p>It passed 228-196, with six Democrats voting for it and six Republicans voting against it.</p><p>In the short term, the bill will go nowhere. The Democratic-controlled Senate will ignore it and the White House says the president would veto it if it ever reached his desk. The White House said the measure was "an assault on a woman's right to choose" and "a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP quietly adds rape and incest exception to abortion bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/house_gop_quietly_adds_rape_and_incest_exception_to_abortion_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/house_gop_quietly_adds_rape_and_incest_exception_to_abortion_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marsha Blackburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The move follows Trent Franks' comment that pregnancies resulting from rape are "very low"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Rep. Trent Franks' comment that pregnancies resulting from rape are "very low," House Republicans went into quiet damage control mode on his bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks - first adding an exception for rape and incest, and then putting conservative Rep. Marsha Blackburn in charge of overseeing the legislation.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/house-adds-rape-exception-to-abortion-ban-bill-92833.html?hp=l2">Politico</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>A spokesman for Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) confirmed Friday to POLITICO that she’ll be managing the debate, and that the bill is being changed to include the new exception.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/house_gop_quietly_adds_rape_and_incest_exception_to_abortion_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/house_gop_quietly_adds_rape_and_incest_exception_to_abortion_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trent Franks fundraises off of rape comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Republican also told supporters that he's "been through a spin dryer" since the remark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., is asking supporters to help defend him against the "taxpayer-funded abortion lobby" that is attacking him for his remark that pregnancy rates from rape are "very low."</p><p>"NARAL, Planned Parenthood and the taxpayer-funded abortion lobby is attacking me for one reason -- I'm 100 percent unapologetically pro-life and I won't back down," Franks wrote to supporters in an email, the <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20130613franks-firestorm-spurs-fundraising.html?nclick_check=1">Arizona Republic</a> reports. "Will you contribute $25, $50, $100, or even $500 right now to help me fight back?"</p><p>“Now they will spend whatever it takes to destroy me, remove me from Congress, and stop me from protecting any more unborn children," he continued.</p><p>Franks was referring to comments he made during a House Judiciary Committee debate on his bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks. Democrats were pushing an amendment to create an exception for rape or incest, which ultimately failed. “Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject — because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low,” Franks said, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/06/12/gop-congressman-rate-of-pregnancies-from-rape-is-very-low/">Washington Post</a> reported.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House responds to &#8220;alarming&#8221; Trent Franks rape comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franks had said that the rate of pregnancy resulting from rape is "very low"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House Press Secretary Jay Carney responded to comments by Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., that the rate of pregnancy resulting from rape is "very low," saying that Franks' remark shows an "alarming disregard for women."</p><p>Franks made the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/">comments</a> in a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, during the debate on his bill to ban abortion after 20 weeks at the national level. Franks was voicing his objections to an amendment that would create an exception for rape or incest. “Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject — because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low,” he said.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/13/white-house-trent-franks_n_3436713.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">Huffington Post</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Senate candidate calls House Republican &#8220;moron&#8221; for rape comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez, who is running for Senate in Massachusetts, slammed Arizona Rep. Trent Franks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel Gomez, the Republican candidate in the special election for senator of Massachusetts, said that Republican Rep. Trent Franks is a "moron" for commenting that most rapes don't result in pregnancy.</p><p>“I think that he’s a moron and he proves that stupid has no specific political affiliation,” Gomez told <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/06/massachusetts-gop-candidate-slams-moron-lawmakers-rape-comment/">ABC News</a>.</p><p>“I have no idea what goes into the mind of a moron like that,” he continued. “These kinds of comments only come from a moron and they shouldn’t be tolerated one bit.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Rate of pregnancy from rape is &#8220;very low&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Trent Franks of Arizona was arguing against a rape and incest exception to an abortion ban]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a House Judiciary Committee debate on his measure to ban abortions after 20 weeks, Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., got a little <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/todd_akin/">Todd Akin</a>-esque, arguing that the chances of a pregnancy resulting from rape are "very low," and therefore a Democratic amendment that would create a rape and incest exception to the ban is irrelevant.</p><p>“Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject — because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low,” Franks said, according to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/06/12/gop-congressman-rate-of-pregnancies-from-rape-is-very-low/">Washington Post</a>. He continued: “But when you make that exception, there’s usually a requirement to report the rape within 48 hours. And in this case that’s impossible because this is in the sixth month of gestation. And that’s what completely negates and vitiates the purpose for such an amendment.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is abortion about to doom Republicans again?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/is_abortion_about_to_doom_republicans_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/is_abortion_about_to_doom_republicans_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry McAuliffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With arch-conservative nominees in Virginia, a test is emerging -- and an Akin moment may not be far behind]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I asked Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, one of the most fiercely pro-choice members of Congress, why she thought the House of Representatives had been so muted this year in its introduction of anti-abortion and anti–Planned Parenthood bills. “It pays to fight,” she said.</p><p>The implication was that House Republicans had decided that the lesson of the bruising 2012 election was to back off on anything that Democrats could tar as a war on women. (In the meantime, their allies in the states could push through <a href="http://www.theatlanticcities.com/politics/2013/05/economic-geography-americas-abortion-wars/5629/">real changes</a> in abortion and contraception access, with very few political barriers.) But that fragile detente may be over, both nationally and in this year’s key state races. The question is whether it's a battle Republicans even want to fight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/is_abortion_about_to_doom_republicans_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/is_abortion_about_to_doom_republicans_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann&#8217;s hateful cronies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/michele_bachmanns_hateful_cronies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/michele_bachmanns_hateful_cronies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12960554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's taken the heat for her Muslim witch hunt, but what about the other congressmen who signed her letters?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Michele Bachmann is standing by her quest to investigate unsubstantiated claims of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in the U.S. government. Glenn Beck said on his radio program today that he spoke to the congresswoman this morning, who told him, “There are decent people up on the Hill that are trying to expose the Muslim Brotherhood, and it is spreading ... <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/07/19/developing-michele-bachmann-responds-to-attacks-after-she-calls-for-investigation-into-muslim-brotherhood/">This disease is spreading so rapidly</a>, it is breathtaking."</p><p>But it’s important to remember that while Bachmann has led this charge, four other members of Congress signed onto her initial round of letters demanding investigations from the inspectors general of five national security agencies, some of whom also have troubling records of Islamophobic conspiracy theorizing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/michele_bachmanns_hateful_cronies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/michele_bachmanns_hateful_cronies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>