<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ernest Hemingway made silly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/ernest_hemingway_made_silly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/ernest_hemingway_made_silly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HBO's unintentionally hilarious "Hemingway &#038; Gellhorn" gets everything disastrously wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s something you should consider doing before watching HBO’s inadvertent comedy “Hemingway &amp; Gellhorn,” a disastrous two-and-a-half-hour CliffsNotes on the passionate, dysfunctional love affair between Ernest Hemingway (Clive Owen) and his third wife, the war correspondent Martha Gellhorn (Nicole Kidman), which airs Monday night. Find some Hemingway — take it off the shelf, download it to a Kindle, load a page of “The Sun Also Rises” onto your computer via Google books — and leave it within arm’s reach. You are going to want to read from it at fairly regular intervals to remind yourself that though he may have been a drunk, a brute and a womanizer, Ernest Hemingway was not a complete and total idiot. And then you can also use it to shield your eyes from the movie’s myriad crimes against sepia, its extensive use of what appear to be Instagram photo effects, the hot pink blood, Metallica’s Lars Ulrich in a beret, and the scene toward the end of the film in which Kidman’s face is superimposed over real footage of emaciated bodies at Auschwitz and Dachau.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/ernest_hemingway_made_silly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/ernest_hemingway_made_silly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;American Idol&#8221;: Riveting despite itself</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/american_idol_riveting_despite_itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/american_idol_riveting_despite_itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all knew Phillip Phillips would win. Yes, the judges are nuts. So why did I feel real emotion anyway?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final episode of any season of “American Idol” is always a smiling show of force, a confetti-laden massacre of time. After a nearly 40-episode season, along comes the gargantuan finale, an enormous spectacle that contains exactly one minute of real content — when the winners are announced — and two-plus hours of filler. Last night’s episode was nominally about who would be declared the winner of the 11thseason of “Idol” -- Phillip Phillips, the humorously named yet handsome guitarist with a twang in his voice and shirts cut to display exactly the appropriate sliver of chest hair, or the huge-voiced, personality-less 16-year old Jessica Sanchez. But sleepily good-looking white guys (and Scotty McCreery) have won the last four seasons of "Idol," and Phillips was pretty much a lock before the night even began. And so it is a commendation to the near-military professionalism of “Idol” that somehow, for the last half-hour or so, I was riveted to the screen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/american_idol_riveting_despite_itself/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/american_idol_riveting_despite_itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More sex and disasters, please</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/more_sex_and_disasters_please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/more_sex_and_disasters_please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desperate Housewives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grey's Anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Good Wife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12925481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV season finales used to be about crazy couplings and exciting explosions. Where did the fun go?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few times of year when network television can typically be relied upon to be as interesting as cable: The fall, when the networks vomit out dozens of new programs; February, when the networks cough up a dozen or so more; and May, when all the series that have survived the year try to end in spectacular fashion. During this last period, season-finale time, couples couple, get married and have babies; characters quit, get fired and die; disasters occur; buildings explode; guns blaze; hatches are discovered and protagonists are left dangling off cliffs, both actual and metaphorical. It’s the TV equivalent of blockbuster season, and like blockbuster season, it can and should be fun. Though in recent years cable shows have been responsible for a disproportionate number of the “Holy crap, did that just <em>happen?!</em>” finales (hello, Gus Fring and his brand-new face!), network shows are usually good for at least some insanity, some drama, some transcendent event that will get people talking around the storied watercooler. Not this year. Nope, this year, season finale season has been a bust.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/more_sex_and_disasters_please/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/more_sex_and_disasters_please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Kristen Wiig departs &#8220;SNL,&#8221; what&#8217;s next for women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Saturday Night Live" says goodbye to a star -- and leaves late night without a queen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, you didn't get to dance with Mick Jagger, hug Jon Hamm and be serenaded by Arcade Fire the last time you left a job? I guess you're not Kristen Wiig.</p><p>After seven years on "SNL," Wiig said goodbye on Saturday night's season finale that will go down as one of the sweetest, most choked-up moments on the show since <a href="http://classicajays.tumblr.com/post/7734859743/so-here-it-is-everyone-the-steve-martin-monologue">Steve Martin said goodbye to Gilda Radner</a> on the day of her death almost exactly 23 years earlier.</p><p>Even without an official announcement, Wiig's twirly, teary departure is enough to make even the most casual fans of the show <a href="http://perezhilton.com/2011-11-14-emma-stone-snl-adele-someone-like-you-sketch-video#.T7pCtnlYuSo">crank up the Adele</a> and mainline a tub of Edy's Grand. It doesn't matter that fellow castmates <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/kristen-wiig-jason-sudeikis-andy-samberg-ve-bid-bye-saturday-night-live-article-1.1081636#ixzz1vW0RD9cy">Andy Samberg and Jason Sudeikis have reportedly moved on</a> from the show as well. They leave behind established male cast members like Seth Meyers, Fred Armisen and Bill Hader. Wiig, on the other hand, blows a gaping hole in the show's female lineup. The 24-year-old Abby Elliott, who moves up the rung to the show's senior lady cast member, is now its biggest female star. But she's yet to display that versatility or command the clout that Wiig has. Kate McKinnon may yet bust out into full-blown "SNL" stardom, but she's only been on the show for five minutes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s &#8220;Community&#8221; without Dan Harmon?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/whats_community_without_dan_harmon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/whats_community_without_dan_harmon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less ambitious shows might survive losing a creator. But firing the prickly showrunner bodes poorly for next season]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent episode of NBC's “Community” floated the possibility — debunked by episode’s end — that the seven main characters had not spent the previous three years navigating life, each other and paintball fights at Greendale Community College, but instead, had only been imagining them. In the episode, the recently expelled Greendale Seven found themselves in a group therapy session with a nefarious shrink, keen to keep them away from their college using any psychological means necessary. The therapist temporarily convinced them they had spent the previous years in a mental institution and that everything they remembered happening at school, except their friendship, had been a collective fantasy, a “shared psychosis” dreamed up in the asylum.</p><p>As I was watching this episode, "<a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/359981/community-curriculum-unavailable">Curriculum Unavailable</a>,” I remember calmly thinking something like, “Huh. That would really explain <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Community_characters#Leonard_Briggs">Leonard</a>.” The possibility that “Community” might be about to “St. Elsewhere” its audience ("St. Elsewhere" ended on the reveal that everything that had happened in the series had all <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Elsewhere#Final_episode">taken place inside the mind of an autistic boy</a>) was not particularly alarming to me. Group psychosis explained a lot about the show's extremely dark psychology, and, anyway, on “Community,” stranger things had happened.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/whats_community_without_dan_harmon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/whats_community_without_dan_harmon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Draper&#8217;s reckoning nears</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In last night's "Mad Men," SCDP staff acted like teenagers -- but they won't get away with it for much longer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Hold fast to dreams/For if dreams die/Life is a broken-winged bird/That cannot fly.” African-American poet Langston Hughes <a href="http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/16075" target="_blank">published these poignant words</a> in 1930, but they didn’t appear in countless yearbook inscriptions and on dorm room posters until the '60s and '70s, when pursuing one’s dreams became the cultural imperative. Following your personal dream meant different things to different people, but it commonly involved rebuking the unified “American dream” everyone had previously agreed upon: marriage, family, a home (one you owned, in post WWII America) and a car. And as Americans became more focused on their personal states, the ones they lived in became distinctly less united.</p><p>In “Christmas Waltz,” the latest episode of “Mad Men,” we find out that cars are part of the dream for ad agencies, too – a sign that they’ve arrived, just as owning a car was once a sign of achieving adulthood, something that the staff at SCDP also hasn’t done yet. Instead, like teenagers, they’re stealing money from their corporate parents’ wallets, driving other people’s cars too fast, napping when they should be working, drinking too much, throwing tantrums (and other things) and having sex with near-strangers. And just as it did in America as a whole, this behavior is taking its toll on their personal unions – or will do so before long.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s coming attractions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/tvs_coming_attractions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/tvs_coming_attractions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fall brings shows from Dane Cook, Matthew Perry and Kevin Bacon. Is there anything new to look forward to?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The four major networks, ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox, trotted out their new fall shows this week. All of next season’s new comedies, dramas and reality shows, the vast majority of which will be flops, got shiny trailers, two to three minutes culled from the first episode of the series, which is, for now, the only episode that exists. These trailers were made to entice advertisers into parting with some of their money, but they are also an occasion for TV obsessives to behave like fashion police, i.e., to make rash, bitchy, wildly subjective judgments based on very little information. I love this week so much.</p><p>This year, about 20 new shows will premiere in the fall, with another dozen waiting in the mid-season wings. There are dramas about haunted luxury apartments, islands armed with nuclear arsenals and the making of Vegas. There are procedurals starring Sherlock Holmes, Jersey girls turned lawyers and a Mob Doctor. One show has Mrs. Coach playing a country singer, one has Kelly Kapoor falling into a swimming pool while riding a bicycle, and another has Kevin Bacon chasing serial killers. There are two sitcoms starring gay people, one about a family who lives next door to aliens, and others featuring Matthew Perry, Lily Tomlin, Dane Cook and a screeching monkey. If each network had at least one show last year about a sexually active, provocative, sassy woman — the lady sitcoms — there is no such equivalent trend this year. There is just a lot of TV, some of which will be good, and most of which will be bad. Here are my thoughts on what look to be the best and worst shows of the upcoming season, network by network.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/tvs_coming_attractions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/tvs_coming_attractions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk-free Internet TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention, Hulu and Netflix: It's not TV, it's the Internet. Original programming needs to take more chances]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Fox Upfront on Monday afternoon, the head of programming “welcomed” Hulu and Netflix to the original programming game, with all the threatening good cheer of an amped-up high school senior getting ready to pound on an incoming freshman’s face. Sure, the more good original programming the better, Fox suggested, but making hit TV is hard and developing an audience is even harder -- these online upstarts should expect to get demolished by their network rivals for a long time to come. Or as the head of programming put it, “Welcome to the NFL.”</p><p>But just mentioning Netflix and Hulu, two companies that have thus far rolled out exactly one original scripted program each to not much fanfare, is a compliment of the “It's better to be talked about than not talked about at all” variety. Hulu and especially Netflix, which will begin airing new episodes of Fox’s former show “Arrested Development” sometime later this year, are on the playing field. Since one of the major distinctions between Hulu and Netflix and broadcast TV is that there’s no proper time to watch their shows, now seemed as good as any to catch up on the two existing series and see if Fox and its brethren have anything to worry about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Britney pass the Paula Abdul test?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/can_britney_pass_the_paula_abdul_test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/can_britney_pass_the_paula_abdul_test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait, we're supposed to be the one judging the one-time pop princess. She'll try and turn the tables on "X-Factor"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumors have been swirling for weeks that Britney Spears would join Fox’s “X-Factor” as a new judge, and yesterday <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jspopvYeLponNGD701_-rpY4YUGQ?docId=8f7a7fc0d62a4ea99843b191aa1a20f6">it became official</a>. At the Fox upfront, the annual presentations underway this week in which the major networks sell their new shows to advertisers, and then ply them with alcohol and vast buffets, Britney and Demi Lovato were introduced as the reality competition’s new judges, joining L.A. Reid and Simon Cowell, who appeared on the show last year. Lovato, the 19-year-old former tween star who has already had her own public difficulties with drugs and eating disorders, excitedly told the crowd she was “psyched” to be joining the show. Spears, in a smokier voice than the one she used to have, also expressed her excitement, capably delivering the line that had been written for her. Spears was onstage for all of two minutes, but it was enough to spark my imagination: What is an entire season of Britney Spears <em>talking</em> going to be like?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/can_britney_pass_the_paula_abdul_test/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/can_britney_pass_the_paula_abdul_test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; evil twins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an episode filled with doubles, Don shows his brilliance -- and Betty returns with a nefarious plan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I don’t like going in with two ideas – it’s weak.”</p><p>A strange statement coming from a man with a dual identity and often hidden motives, but then “Dark Shadows,” the latest “Mad Men” episode, is rife with competitive doubles, if not actual evil twins. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Shadows" target="_blank">Just like in a soap opera</a>, wink wink.) Don and Ginsberg have dueling <a href="http://snowizard.com/history/" target="_blank">SnoBall</a> campaigns, Peggy reminds Roger she’s supposed to be his secret sharer rather than that <em>schlemiel</em> Ginsberg, Megan struggles to be friends with both Sally and Don, Henry’s torn between two candidates he’s worked for, and everyone seems to have at least two wives – even if Pete’s second one belongs to another man. Unlike the SnoBall fight with Ginsberg that he rigs, Don wins the wife competition fair and square by having three, even if one was in name only. As Betty tells Sally when she works on her family tree, “They only care about the names anyway.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child acting&#8217;s new golden age</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/child_actings_new_golden_age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/child_actings_new_golden_age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12919070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Chloe Grace Moretz to "Shameless," kids aren't just getting more roles -- they're actually good. What changed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Never work with children or animals" is an old W.C. Fields chestnut that, for a while in the '90s and '00s, everyone outside of children's entertainment seemed to be holding sacred. Child actors were off on their own in a parallel entertainment universe created by Disney and Nickelodeon, while adults held down the fort in dramas and reality shows. There were some notable exceptions, like Haley Joel Osment and Christina Ricci, but by and large, children were almost entirely absent from grown-up entertainment.</p><p>Things are very different today. Kid-targeted movies filled with teenage actors like "The Hunger Games" and the "Harry Potter" franchise have found a huge adult audience, while actors like 15-year-old Chloë Moretz (who stars in the new movie "Hick," opening this week) and the Fanning sisters are given prominent roles in serious dramas. On TV, children have become a regular part of many casts, from sitcoms ("The Middle," "Modern Family") to dramas ("Shameless," 'The Walking Dead"). Child actors, once a sign of cheesiness and unprofessional conduct, have become integral to the success of a large number of critically respected and commercially successful entertainment properties. And not only that, many of these child actors have gotten really, really good.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/child_actings_new_golden_age/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/child_actings_new_golden_age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please don&#8217;t cancel my favorite show</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/please_dont_cancel_my_favorite_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/please_dont_cancel_my_favorite_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12919196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Parks and Rec," "30 Rock" and "Parenthood" sneak through for another year. Why do we get so anxious over TV shows?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s that time of the TV year, when I find myself humming “Dayenu” all day.</p><p>“Dayenu,” the official anthem of Passover, is a song of gratitude, one thanking God for all that he did to free the Jews from slavery. The lyrics make a list: Each line enumerates something awesome and imperative that God did, before ending with “Dayenu,” which means “It would have been enough.” However, “paradoxically” (as my Haggadah puts it), the Jews really needed God to do many more awesome and imperative things, one example of which is then mentioned in the next line of the song. If God had gotten the Jews out of Egypt, “it would have been enough,” except, actually, he then had to part the Red Sea, which “would have been enough,” except, actually, he then had to provide food, “which would have been enough,” except, actually, and so and so forth until the Jews are safely tucked away in Israel with the 10 Commandments and a temple.</p><p>The Dayenu I’ve been humming this week has the same tune, but slightly different lyrics. They go like this: If NBC had aired just one season of “Community,” Dayenu. If NBC had aired the missing pen bottle episode, Dayenu. And the Christmas claymation episode, the my dinner with Abed episode, the Dungeons &amp; Dragons episode, and the paintball sequel, Dayenu. If Inspector Spacetime, day-day-enu, day-day-enu, day-day-enu, dayenu dayenu.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/please_dont_cancel_my_favorite_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/please_dont_cancel_my_favorite_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s creepiest corpses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/tvs_creepiest_corpses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/tvs_creepiest_corpses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten network shows usually open with a murder. That's 200 deaths each season. Which one was the gnarliest?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The network TV season ends this month, and with it a significant amount of carnage. There are currently 10 network shows — "Bones," "Criminal Minds," "The Mentalist," "Castle," "Body of Proof," the three "CSIs," and the two "NCISes" — that typically begin with a murder, the expected first beat in any crime procedural. This amounts to approximately 200 corpses a year, 200 dead bodies intended to entertain, to be prurient but not too prurient, disturbing, but not too disturbing. How do these shows make murder not only palatable, but a thing that millions of people <em>want</em> to watch after a long day's work?  In contravention of common sense, avoiding the dead bodies altogether does not seem to be an option.</p><p>The 10 aforementioned murder series can be divided into two general categories, crime-solving shows and the corpse-studying shows. Both activities take place in both, but with a different emphasis. Programs in the first category, like "The Mentalist," "Castle," "NCIS" and "Criminal Minds," have forensic scientists in the cast who can and do deliver helpful deductions about any cadaver, but the main characters mostly interview living people. On programs in the second category, like "Bones," "Body of Proof" and the "CSIs," the main characters mostly examine dead ones. The bodies in the crime-solving shows tend to be significantly less gruesome and graphic than the ones in the corpse-studying shows: The corpses may be a major plot point in both, but they're only a major prop in the latter, where they have to look the part.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/tvs_creepiest_corpses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/tvs_creepiest_corpses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It pays to be trash TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/it_pays_to_be_trash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/it_pays_to_be_trash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["2 Broke Girls" is unfunny and racist -- and it knows it. Then why are so many people watching?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV was created to sell soap. It’s not glorious, but there it is. For most of its not very long history, television was a medium designed to get an audience to stay tuned for the next set of commercials. It’s only in the last two decades that making quality  TV -- nudged along by a trickle, and then a flood, of ambitious showrunners with explicitly artistic intentions -- has become an end unto itself, a socially valuable, prestige and brand burnishing endeavor, ratings be damned. The rise of “quality TV” doesn’t mean that workaday TV, some of it fun and escapist and satisfying, has ceased to exist. If “Mad Men” and “CSI” coexist fairly peacefully, there is still a TV fault line where art and commerce rub against each other, and no show this year has exemplified the difficulties of navigating that fault line quite like CBS’s “2 Broke Girls,” which wraps up its first season tonight. “2 Broke Girls” has always aimed to sell soap, but because of its pilot and its pedigree, it got mislabeled as art. It has spent the rest of this TV season getting kicked, hard, out of the gallery.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/it_pays_to_be_trash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/it_pays_to_be_trash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; generation gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12915977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Megan makes a surprising choice, Don is confronted with changing '60s culture -- and Pete's spiral continues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something strange occurred somewhere in the middle of the 1960s. People began doing what they felt like doing, rather than what was expected of them.</p><p>Of course, rebels and freethinkers had always done this, but they were rare and often paid a price for their actions, even losing their lives. Now ordinary people began adopting the mantra, “If it feels good, do it.” Personal satisfaction, rather than duty, increasingly became the driver behind people’s choices. And they didn’t pay a price, unless you count the anger and jealousy evoked in those who weren’t courageous enough to do the same. Nearly 200 years after America was founded on a right to the “pursuit of happiness,” Americans began to claim that right. And they’ve never looked back.</p><p>“There are no second acts in American life,” F. Scott Fitzgerald famously declared, without living long enough to see the constant self-reinvention of our age. In “Lady Lazarus,” the latest episode of “Mad Men,” Megan chooses to re-make her life, simply because her career isn’t making her happy. Even with her recent success, and the discovery that she’s able to “do everything,” (as Don declared in a tone of awe), she finds advertising so boring that leaving it is akin to raising herself from the dead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sherlock&#8217;s&#8221; masterful return</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sherlocks_masterful_return/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sherlocks_masterful_return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherlock Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As its second season begins, the British series' complex take on Holmes remains transfixing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Internet has helpfully pointed out, Benedict Cumberbatch<a href="http://redscharlach.tumblr.com/post/19565284869/otters-who-look-like-benedict-cumberbatch-a"> looks like an otter</a>. The preposterously, even pervily named Cumberbatch, stars in “Sherlock,” a modern-day adaptation of the legendary Sir Arthur Conan Doyle stories beginning its second season on PBS this Sunday. He has tiny, intense eyes, slashes of bright blue on a face composed of geometric planes, all cutting cheekbones jutting out of a flat face, finished off with a mop of curly brown hair and a flowing, high-collared overcoat. Early in the series' first season, a skeptical detective pointed out that a genius like Holmes could easily break bad, just one bout of boredom away from committing the crimes he solves so effortlessly, and the cool, charismatic Cumberbatch conveys the implicit threat that underlies this Holmes easily. Otters are cute, but they’re also squirrelly.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sherlocks_masterful_return/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sherlocks_masterful_return/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s tortured virgins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/tvs_tortured_virgins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/tvs_tortured_virgins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grey's Anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherlock Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Grey's Anatomy," "Sherlock" and "Girls" all reflect our culture's schizophrenic attitude toward chastity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since “90210’s” Donna Martin held on to hers for seven seasons, adult virginity -- the state of having it and the act of losing it -- has been a recurring plot point on TV dramas, and not just ones set in high school. The rules that apply to virginity in characters of a certain age are more or less the same ones that apply to Chekhov’s famous gun: If it appears in the first season, it will probably go off by the third, or the fourth, or the seventh, just as it did for Donna Martin. There are currently three fictional adults — or two adults and a self-identified “Girl” — grappling with their virginities with varying amounts of shame in big-name TV shows. (Shame-free virginity: not currently a fictional TV offering.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/tvs_tortured_virgins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/tvs_tortured_virgins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A conservative show goes liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/a_conservative_show_goes_liberal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/a_conservative_show_goes_liberal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Man Standing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Last Man Standing," a series about a pigheaded misogynist, has become an unexpected paean to open-mindedness]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Allen’s sitcom “Last Man Standing," which aired the penultimate episode of its first season last night,  is winding up with far less braggadocio than it began with. The show began as part of a triumvirate of ABC sitcoms about masculinity in crisis, men being besieged and bettered by women at every turn (the other two were the hapless-if-sweet dad sitcom “Man Up” and the all-time cross-dressing horror show “Work It,” which was canceled after two episodes). In the pilot, Allen’s character, Mike Baxter, a hunting and wildlife aficionado who helps run an outdoor equipment outlet, ranted and raved about “what happened to men?” while worrying that a touchy-feely nursery school might turn his grandson gay.</p><p>Early episodes of the series were almost all about the battle of the genders, but in a more complicated way than the pilot initially suggested. Mike has a wife and three daughters whom, because of his wife’s promotion, he is spending more time with and to whom he is gruffly devoted. Episode in and out, they exert a civilizing influence on Mike. Writing in Slate about “Last Man Standing’s” <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2011/12/tim_allen_s_last_man_standing_defending_the_last_sad_man_sitcom_.html">transformation into a more nuanced show</a>, June Thomas called out an early episode in which Mike secretly voted to turn his work softball team coed; even though he is a lover of masculine bonding, he couldn’t bear to think of his own daughters being forbidden from doing anything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/a_conservative_show_goes_liberal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/a_conservative_show_goes_liberal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s gift to bad actors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From "Mad Men's" January Jones to "Castle's" Stana Katic, the medium is weirdly suited to inexpressive mediocrity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Mad Men” and ABC’s romantic-detective procedural “Castle” don’t seem to have much in common: One is the best show on television, and the other is a perfectly serviceable will-they-won’t-they series on ABC. But both “Mad Men” and “Castle” (which airs its second-to-last episode of the season tonight) contain frosty, unlikable, not-very-good actresses in pivotal roles — January Jones as Betty Draper and Stana Katic as Detective Kate Beckett, the romantic lead playing across from the antic Nathan Fillion — and it hardly matters to the series’ well-being at all.</p><p>Betty is a very interesting character, but having seen Jones on “Saturday Night Live" and in “X-Men: First Class,” in which she could barely play an actual Ice Queen, I have no lingering doubts about her skill set. Meanwhile, the consistently rated “Castle” has gained quite a following, despite the fact that Katic makes the main character on “Bones,” who is supposed to fall somewhere on the autism spectrum, seem emotionally intuitive and empathic. My point here is not to rag on Jones and Katic, so much as marvel at how little their failings have mattered to the shows they work on. Television is very kind to bad actors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Draper loses his touch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At an awards ceremony celebrating his accomplishments, he learns that some things are not what they seem ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night “<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zpqt3zgdYUw" target="_blank">At the Codfish Ball</a>,” our mad men and women learned that life isn’t a party just because you’ve dressed yourself up, and losing can sometimes appear disguised behind a mask of winning. Fortunately, to borrow Cosgrove’s term, there’s also the possibility of a “double secret reverse,” in which you get what makes you happy even if it’s not what you expected – or what others think is right.</p><p>In this fish tale, the genders are moving up and down like parallel elevators in the Time-Life building, the workplace that consumes so much of their lives they barely can escape it for a meal that doesn’t involve business – and in this episode, not even for that. But this show is about time and life – the time in these characters’ lives, and the times they’re living in. Unfortunately for them, few seem to be having the time of their lives.</p><p>After her failure to impersonate Don, Peggy’s off the Heinz account, but seems in good spirits when Stan and Ginsberg treat her like one of the boys. She rolls with the sexual banter about how she’s got a way with the equipment on the Playtex account, as well as Ginsberg’s criticism that she’s a “traditionalist in the bosom arena” (something that will be challenged in this episode), defending her opinion about selling youthful, sexy bras to older women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

