<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter sides with Occupier</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/twitter_sides_with_occupier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/twitter_sides_with_occupier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a surprise move, the social media giant steps in to quash a subpoena against an OWS arrestee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, Occupy Wall Street participant and Brooklyn Bridge arrestee Malcolm Harris was<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/who_owns_your_tweets/"> unable to quash</a> a subpoena demanding Twitter hand over information about his account to the authorities. But in a surprise move this week, <a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2012/05/Twitter-Motion_to_Quash.pdf">Twitter has come out batting for its user.</a></p><p>When a New York judge ruled in April that Harris did not have the standing to fight the subpoena (arguing that his tweets actually belonged to Twitter) and that there were no privacy grounds on which the individual user could refute the demand for his Twitter records, this seemed to suggest something worrying: that we have little jurisdiction over our online identities and can't even fight for our online speech in court.</p><p>Harris' lawyer, Martin Stolar, told me at the time that he planned to file another motion against the judge's decision -- to re-argue that his client indeed has a standing in fighting the order, and there are strong privacy grounds to resisting the authorities obtaining records of someone's accumulated Twitter activities (including deleted messages) without a warrant. But now it seems Stolar doesn't need to file this motion; Twitter has stepped in.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/twitter_sides_with_occupier/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/twitter_sides_with_occupier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama goes viral, wins Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's endorsement of gay marriage becomes a cleverly -- and intensely -- choreographed meme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Barack Obama blew America's mind by declaring his support for same-sex marriage Wednesday, he explained that his views on the subject had long been<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/e_3/"> "evolving."</a> But while evolution is a process that can take millennia, social media moves with considerably more swiftness. However long it took the White House (nudged though it was by Joe Biden's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/the_unlikely_liberal_hero/">Sunday blurt</a> that he was "absolutely comfortable" with marriage equality) to get to that place, it took no time at all for Obama's sentiments to become a meme.</p><p>It's no accident that the president's change of heart happened to make for a perfect sound bite. Nearly as fast as Barack Obama, leader of the free world, could utter the words "Same-sex couples should be able to get married," to ABC News correspondent Robin Roberts, @barackobama -- the president's not-nearly-as-popular-as@JustinBieber Twitter account -- was announcing <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/BarackObama/status/200303635895296000">"Same-sex couples should be able to get married."</a> As of Thursday morning, it had been <a href="http://retweetingobama.com/">retweeted over 56,000 times and counting.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_goes_viral_wins_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons from a Twitter train wreck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/lessons_from_a_twitter_trainwreck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/lessons_from_a_twitter_trainwreck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sportswriter Joe Cowley tries to delete his sexist tweets to save himself. Too bad he misunderstands the Internet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a lot about what went down with <a href="http://deadspin.com/5906105/chicago-sun+times-columnist-joe-cowley-rides-a-plane-degrades-women-everywhere">Chicago Sun-Times columnist Joe Cowley's painfully sexist airplane rant</a> on Twitter this weekend that's hilarious. There was the whining that "I'm more likely to see a Squatch before I see a hot flight attendant." There was the concern over flying in a plane with a "Chick pilot." There was his gloriously tone-deaf response to sportswriter Sloane Martin about his comments, culminating with a demand she "hottie up that [profile] pic a bit more." Had he added a mention of how much he <a href="http://youtu.be/uyYhFsXdZVk ">loves scotchy scotch scotch</a>, the entire tirade could still not have felt more deliriously out of time.</p><p>But the most wildly out-of-touch element to the whole affair was what Cowley did next. He shut down his Twitter account. It's a classic response to an online attack of verbal diarrhea -- the old waving of the magic delete wand to make all the bad stuff disappear. Too bad it doesn't work.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/lessons_from_a_twitter_trainwreck/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/lessons_from_a_twitter_trainwreck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who owns your tweets?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/who_owns_your_tweets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/who_owns_your_tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12909663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge's decision to uphold a subpoena for an Occupy arrestee's Twitter account raises serious privacy issues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tweet a lot. Sometimes I feel like I tweet more often than I have face-to-face conversations -- and therein lie multiple issues that will not be addressed here (but perhaps one day, in therapy). However, in the course of constructing these 140-character-or-less nuggets of opinion, information or political agitation, never did I give much thought to whether these tweets were mine. It turns out they're not, in the eyes of the law. For all the clamor about <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/06/20/the_revolution_will_be_tweeted?hidecomments=yes" target="_blank">Twitter's revolutionary potential</a> in the Middle East, we have a reminder right here in New York of its revolutionary limitations.</p><p>On Monday, a Manhattan judge ruled that writer, Occupy Wall Street participant and<a href="http://gawker.com/5868073/"> prankster </a>(and, for the purpose of full disclosure, <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/21/new-york-city-finally-stands-up-to-occupy">my good friend</a>) Malcolm Harris will not be able to block a subpoena on his Twitter account, including "any and all user information including email addresses" tied to it because, according to the judge, our tweets are not ours at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/who_owns_your_tweets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/who_owns_your_tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mom, get off Twitter!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12871821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtney Love's recent missteps point to an emerging problem: The oversharing Gen-Xer with a social media account]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn't that long ago that a generational social media disaster looked like "<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/shitmydadsays ">S#&amp;% My Dad Says</a>." It was amusing, the way <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/29/old_people/">The Olds</a> were inadvertently posting on their adult offsprings' Facebook walls and thinking it was email. Look at them, with their lack of technical acumen and their crotchety pleas for assistance! You know what embarrassing your kids looks like now? Courtney Love.</p><p>Granted, Ms. Love has never been the traditional SUV-driving, cookie-baking kind of mom who <a href="http://www.stfuparentsblog.com/">posts incredibly detailed stuff about her baby's poops</a>.  But her recent slew of attention-getting Twitter insanity -- and her 19-year-old daughter Frances Bean's mortified response – suggests we are entering a new era of fail, one in which a parent's awkward behavior isn't of the adorable "What's this button do?" variety. Instead, it may be more like "S#&amp;% My Dad Said At Burning Man."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expelled for profanity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/expelled_for_profanity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/expelled_for_profanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12793401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An incident in Indiana raises the question: Should tweeting an F bomb get you kicked out of school?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Austin Carroll is a 17-year-old high school senior in Garrett, Ind., who recently did something so outrageous that it got him expelled from school. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/students-profane-tweet-stirs-free-speech-debate-185703148.html">He used profanity. On Twitter.</a> Oh my stars and garters! What is the world coming to?</p><p>To hear even his own family describe him, Carroll sounds like a bit of a handful. Last month, he earned a suspension for violating the school dress code and wearing a kilt, and last fall, he ran afoul of the school administration for tweeting an F bomb via a school computer.</p><p>But Carroll insists his more recent Twitter tirade -- which Indiana News Center colorfully quotes as <a href="http://www.indianasnewscenter.com/news/local/District-Employee-Tweets-Think-before-you-type-people-austincarroll-146007015.html">"BEEP is one of those BEEP words you can BEEP use in any BEEP sentence and it still BEEP make sense"</a> -- was banged out from his personal account on his home computer. The school district says the post came from a school-issued device or the school's network. (Both Carroll and the district seem to agree that the post was not directed at any individual or the school itself.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/expelled_for_profanity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/expelled_for_profanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Franzen doesn&#8217;t get Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/franzen_doesnt_get_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/franzen_doesnt_get_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Franzen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12588951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author calls it "the ultimate irresponsible medium." But he doesn't understand why people actually tweet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some ways, we’ve brought this on ourselves; it is a slippery slope. First you wonder what Angelina Jolie had for breakfast because she was so great in that one movie or whatever and then you’re buying cereal and thinking, “Does Oprah eat Raisin Bran?” Eventually, you even start to give a damn about what famous writers think about the weather or, say, social networking, and someone like Jonathan Franzen revels in his dislike of Twitter and other means of social networking from his Important Writer perch and we respond because if Franzen hates Twitter, does he hate us too? The angst is unbearable and yet it’s all sort of inevitable.</p><p>Franzen’s A Great American Writer and all but I don’t give a much of a damn about his opinions on anything (see: Edith Wharton obvi). Or I do. Is it really surprising that Franzen doesn’t care for Facebook or Twitter? His overall comportment does not suggest an affinity for the levity of social networking. I can’t really say I love Facebook, myself. It has become increasingly hard to make sense of the interface and I keep getting invited to parties and readings in Bali and Temecula and I don’t live in those places, so the experience is, at best, fragmented. At the same time, I don’t need to proselytize my dislike unless I’m on Twitter. Who cares? My opinion doesn’t matter nor does Franzen’s, though he is Very Fancy, so in the calculus of mattering, his irrelevant opinion is less irrelevant than mine. Math.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/franzen_doesnt_get_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/franzen_doesnt_get_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Losing my husband, 140 characters at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/24/losing_my_husband_140_characters_at_a_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/24/losing_my_husband_140_characters_at_a_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12204151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Kevin got cancer, all my rage and isolation went onto Twitter. Was I embarrassing myself, or rescuing myself?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time when I kept private journals, chronicling stories of time with my husband as if words could nail down a life and build strong, warm walls around us. That was before cancer. A kind you’ve hopefully never heard of, a sure, slow killer. Once we’d slogged through a couple of years <em>there,</em> I logged into Twitter and didn’t grapple with whether or why. Rather than holding us together now, I was a spectacle of flying apart. Twitter unleashed my inner ranting-woman-on-the-subway. You know the one — no inhibitions, breaking the code of civilized silence.</p><blockquote><p><em>Obsessed with idea of being alone in a room w/old unwanted glassware &amp; crockery, obliterating things till satiated, then someone else sweeps </em>7:25 AM Aug 3rd, 2009 from web</p></blockquote><p>Consider the supermarket sagas. It was a place I spent a lot of time, both because I had young children to feed and because that’s where the pharmacy was. I would wait in line to pick up the narcotics and antiemetics, trying not to look at the varied pleasure-enhancing condoms. If my husband Kevin hadn’t “followed” me, I would have whipped out my phone to share some bitter thoughts about ribbed strawberry rubbers. But when I wheeled my cart away after begging for one or two pills to get him through a Sunday night, I did tweet:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/24/losing_my_husband_140_characters_at_a_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/24/losing_my_husband_140_characters_at_a_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Army is reading your Bradley Manning tweets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/the_army_is_reading_your_bradley_manning_tweets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/the_army_is_reading_your_bradley_manning_tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12027751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military public affairs officials in WikiLeaks case use software that specializes in tracking Twitter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(UPDATED BELOW)</strong></p><p>Politico’s Josh Gerstein <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2012/01/army-bradley-manning-coverage-negative-but-balanced-110292.html">reports</a> on the extent to which the Army’s public affairs office is interested in public and media opinion of the Bradley Manning case, noting that P.R. staffers prepared daily summaries of the coverage of the ongoing legal proceedings. This bit jumped out at me:</p><blockquote><p><strong>The Army used a commercial service called VOCUS to track traditional and social media coverage of Manning's hearing</strong>. The Pentagon pays close attention to the volume of tweets about the U.S. military during high-profile incidents, like the Air Force One flyover that distressed New York City residents in 2009 …</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://images.politico.com/global/2012/01/120105_paosummary.html">Here</a> (.pdf), via Gerstein, is the Public Affairs Office media coverage summary that refers to “1,045 social media conversations about the hearing.” It also notes that “the VOCUS media site listed most of the coverage of Manning as negative, the majority of the coverage about the hearing remains balanced and factual.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/the_army_is_reading_your_bradley_manning_tweets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/the_army_is_reading_your_bradley_manning_tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post introduces incredibly useless new way to follow 2012 buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/03/washington_post_introduces_incredibly_useless_new_way_to_follow_2012_buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/03/washington_post_introduces_incredibly_useless_new_way_to_follow_2012_buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11798861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The @MentionMachine ranks candidates based on how often they're tweeted about, so congratulations, President Paul]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Post's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/atmentionmachine-tracks-the-2012-candidates-whos-up-whos-down-on-twitter/2011/12/20/gIQAHC9s7O_blog.html?hpid=z2">new "MentionMachine" tool explains in its introductory post</a> precisely what is wrong with it. The "candidate trend app" simply maps Twitter mentions of candidates and then ranks them. Here the Post attempts to make this sound useful:</p><blockquote><p>When Texas Gov. Rick Perry declared his candidacy for the Republican nomination Aug. 13, the same day as the Ames Straw Poll, those watching social streams could have rightfully assumed he had won the Iowa contest. Twitter exploded with Perry mentions, even though he didn’t participate in the straw poll, while the winner, Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.), drew far less attention. Social media was the writing on the wall. Perry would soon trend up in polls, surpassing Bachmann and the rest of the field. Twitter was the early — scratch that — Twitter was the real-time warning system.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/03/washington_post_introduces_incredibly_useless_new_way_to_follow_2012_buzz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/03/washington_post_introduces_incredibly_useless_new_way_to_follow_2012_buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why kids need solitude</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10809981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our culture of immediate gratification is changing our children. A teacher and author explains what we\'re losing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demand for remedial instruction in colleges is on the rise. About 75 percent of New York City freshmen attending community college last year needed remedial math, reading or writing courses. The organization that administers the ACT found that only one in four of 2010 high school graduates who took the ACT exam were college-ready in four key subjects areas: English, math, reading and science. Statistics like these are startling, as they not only reveal serious flaws in our educational system, but also raise questions as to how these students will fare in the future if they are lacking the knowledge and critical skills needed to succeed in college and beyond.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/28/why_kids_need_solitude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best and worst tweets of the year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashton Kutcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lara Logan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10702531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Zuccotti Park to Tahrir Square, these tweets shook the world in 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One hundred and forty characters can make or sink a career. They can start a movement. They can make history. We've witnessed for years now the power of social media – from bearing witness to the protests in Iran to providing a ringside seat to MIA's feud with Lynn Hirschberg. But in 2011, Twitter once again didn't just offer a bite-sized window into the news of the day – often enough, it became it. Whether they were funny, harrowing, or just plain ill advised, these were the tweets heard round the world.</p><p><em><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/nirrosen">"It's always wrong, that's obvious, but I'm rolling my eyes at all the attention she'll get."</a></em></p><p>While covering the Egyptian protests back in February, CBS reporter Lara Logan was separated from her crew and endured a horrifying sexual and physical assault. And when the news filtered out from Tahrir Square, New York University Center for Law and Security fellow Nir Rosen fired off <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/lara_logan_rape_reaction/">a torrent of scathing tweets</a> about the attack, admitting "She's so bad that I ran out of sympathy for her," and adding "it would have been funny if it happened to Anderson [Cooper] too." In the wake a furious backlash, Rosen swiftly deleted the tweets, apologized for his words, and resigned from NYU. Today, he's back on Twitter after a brief sabbatical, but as he wrote for Salon last winter, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/nir_rosen_explains_twitter_controversy/">"with 480 characters I undid a long career."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_best_and_worst_tweets_of_the_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter takes sides on the Internet&#8217;s future</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/04/the_difference_between_twitter_and_cisco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/04/the_difference_between_twitter_and_cisco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10283363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While some tech companies aim to sell surveillance, one aims to thwart it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you're wondering where Internet and other digital technologies are headed, take note of two news items from this past week.</p><p>The first was a piece in the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trade-in-surveillance-technology-raises-worries/2011/11/22/gIQAFFZOGO_story.html">profiling the Wiretappers' Ball</a>, a recent gathering in suburban Maryland for those who make tools for surveilling, monitoring and throttling the Internet -- and for the people who buy them. The get-together, according to the Post, featured more than three dozen countries and nearly as many U.S. federal agencies. It's a showcase event for an industry in which behemoths like Cisco, and smaller players like Blue Coat, help control and track the Internet activities of the government's enemies in China (Falun Gong) and Syria (revolutionaries).</p><p>The second, smaller development, reported by the Wall Street Journal, was that<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/11/28/twitter-adds-team-who-created-privacy-tools-for-activists/"> San Francisco-based Twitter Inc. had acquired Whisper Systems</a>, a two-person firm that specializes in securing the Android mobile operating system. The firm's only employees -- the marvelously named Moxie Marlinspike and fellow researcher Stuart Anderson -- seek to make it harder for snoops to monitor who and how) you are texting, calling and otherwise connecting with digitally.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/04/the_difference_between_twitter_and_cisco/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/04/the_difference_between_twitter_and_cisco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teen to Sam Brownback: You suck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/teen_to_sam_brownback_you_suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/teen_to_sam_brownback_you_suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Brownback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10269155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a Kansas teen tweeted her dislike of the state's conservative governor, she caused a national incident]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(updated below)</strong></p><p>Emma Sullivan doesn't have the fiery rhetoric of a Paul Krugman or Rachel Maddow's comprehensive grasp of the issues. She isn't Keith Olbermann or even Howard Kurtz. She's a high school senior in Kansas, a young woman just eligible to vote. But her political commentary has nonetheless created a firestorm way beyond Shawnee Mission East school.</p><p>Last week, during a Kansas Youth in Government field trip, Sullivan watched Gov. Sam Brownback speak. Unmoved, she cavalierly tweeted to her roughly 65 followers, <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/emmakate988">"Just made mean comments at gov. brownback and told him he sucked, in person #heblowsalot."</a> A teenager tweeting that her governor "sucks" and "blows" – "a lot"? Sounds like grounds for an incident of national proportions!</p><p>Sure enough, Brownback's office – the Thin Skin Division -- noted Sullivan's tweet, and contacted Youth in Government. As Sherriene Jones-Sontag, Brownback's communications director, explained to the Kansas City Star, <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2011/11/23/3283680/students-joke-creates.html">"That wasn’t respectful. </a>In order to really have a constructive dialogue, there has to be mutual respect." She added, "It was important for the organization to be aware of the comments their students were making."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/teen_to_sam_brownback_you_suck/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/teen_to_sam_brownback_you_suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>179</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashton Kutcher&#8217;s massive Twitter fail</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/ashton_kutchers_massive_twitter_fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/ashton_kutchers_massive_twitter_fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashton Kutcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Paterno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10197780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The actor hastily posted dumb comments about Joe Paterno -- but his biggest mistake was leaving the conversation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's really not Ashton Kutcher's month. First, the actor best known for playing lunkheaded stoners found himself embroiled in tawdry accusations of an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/12/ashton_kutchers_lessons_in_unsafe_sex/">unprotected extramarital boots knocking </a>with a 22-year-old blonde. Then on Wednesday evening, he committed <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/aplusk ">epic tweet fail</a> by tossing off an outraged response to the dismissal of embattled Penn State coach Joe Paterno. "How do you fire Jo Pa?" he wrote. "#insult #noclass as a hawkeye fan I find it in poor taste."</p><p>As headlines across the world have made clear, the legendary 84-year-old was not ousted this week because of his age or his job performance. Instead, he was fired for his lackadaisical response to charges that former assistant coach Jerry <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/the_shame_of_penn_state/singleton/">Sandusky allegedly sexually abused a young boy</a> in a campus locker room. Though Paterno related the alleged incident to his superiors, he did not report any wrongdoing to the police. On Saturday, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/06/sports/ncaafootball/former-coach-at-penn-state-is-charged-with-abuse.html?pagewanted=all">Sandusky was charged</a> with multiple counts of sex abuse involving eight boys over the course of several years.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/ashton_kutchers_massive_twitter_fail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/ashton_kutchers_massive_twitter_fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence agencies step up the Twitter and Facebook trawling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security works to catch up with the CIA in the social media monitoring department]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of days ago, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">the Associated Press reported</a> that the Department of Homeland Security claims not to be "actively monitoring" social media networks like Facebook and Twitter. Lest you worry that status updates that present a threat to national security are going unread, the <a href="http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111104/ap_on_go_ot/us_cia_social_media">AP today reports</a> that the Central Intelligence Agency <em>is</em> actively monitoring social media networks.</p><p>The story in the earlier article was that our sprawling intelligence and national security apparatus was caught off-guard by social media-fueled uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa, and that they were going to take steps to be better prepared in the future.</p><p>DHS Undersecretary Caryn Wagner said the department was still trying to figure out how to use Twitter and Facebook information for law enforcement purposes. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">And they seem to be starting completely from scratch:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Voldemort right about Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/is_voldemort_right_about_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/is_voldemort_right_about_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Fiennes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10152651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ralph Fiennes rails against the "erosion" of language -- but the truth is far more complicated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord Voldemort is not happy. Accepting the British Film Institute Fellowship at the BFI London Film Festival awards this week, Ralph Fiennes -- the man whose savage portrayals of Nazis, evil wizards and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/02/08/band_bruges/">foulmouthed gangsters</a> haunt your nightmares -- railed against his own bete noire: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/8853427/Ralph-Fiennes-blames-Twitter-for-eroding-language.html">"a world of truncated sentences, sound bites and Twitter."</a> Like!</p><p>Fiennes, who's currently playing Prospero in the Theatre Royal Haymarket's version of "The Tempest," added, "I think we're living in a time when our ears are attuned to a flattened and truncated sense of our English language, so this always begs the question, is Shakespeare relevant?… I hear it too from people at drama schools, who say (young people) find the density of a Shakespeare text a challenge in a way that, perhaps, [students] a few generations ago maybe wouldn't have."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/is_voldemort_right_about_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/is_voldemort_right_about_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our misplaced faith in Twitter Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/our_misplaced_faith_in_twitter_trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/our_misplaced_faith_in_twitter_trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10127666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#OccupyWallStreet probably isn't being censored, but it's time to stop worshiping algorithms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting question is not whether Twitter is censoring its Trends list. The interesting question is, what do we think the Trends list is, what it represents and how it works, that we can presume to hold it accountable when we think it is "wrong"? What are these algorithms, and what do we want them to be?</p><p>It's not the first time it has been asked. <a href="http://blog.socialflow.com/post/7120244374/data-reveals-that-occupying-twitter-trending-topics-is-harder-than-it-looks">Gilad Lotan</a> at SocialFlow (and erstwhile Microsoft researcher), spurred by <a href="http://theconversation.edu.au/did-twitter-censor-occupy-wall-street-3822">questions</a> raised by participants and supporters of the Occupy Wall Street protests, asks the question: Is Twitter censoring its <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/trends">Trends</a> list to exclude #occupywallstreet and #occupyboston? While the protest movement gains traction and media coverage, and participants, observers and critics turn to Twitter to discuss it, why are these widely known hashtags not trending? Why are they not trending in the very cities where protests have occurred, including New York?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/our_misplaced_faith_in_twitter_trends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/our_misplaced_faith_in_twitter_trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/pop_five_green_album_muppets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/pop_five_green_album_muppets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/16/pop_five_green_album_muppets</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's catch: Young adults use phone to avoid talking to you, the Muppets' "Green Album," and more TSA profiling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Album of the day:</strong> You must, must, must listen to "The Green Album," a compilation of artists ranging from Andrew Bird to Weezer and OK Go covering the hits of Muppets. You can stream it all here, <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/08/14/138984517/first-listen-muppets-the-green-album">or read the full story at NPR</a>.&#160;</p><p>&#160;</p><p><strong>2. Obvious fact of the day:</strong> A new study by the Pew Institute reveals that "<a href="http://www.nerve.com/news/current-events/young-adults-are-pretending-to-text-just-to-avoid-you">30 percent of adults 18-29 have pretended to be on the phone in order to avoid human interaction.</a>" The other 70 percent are either playing Angry Birds or sexting, no duh.</p><p><strong>3. Terrifying Twitter of the day:</strong> Courtney Stodden, the child (but not childlike) <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/15/doug_hutchison_courtney_stodden">bride of 51-year-old Doug Hutchison</a>, continues to prove her classiness online <a href="http://crushable.com/entertainment/courtney-stoddens-twitter-is-basically-softcore-porn/">with updates like this</a>:</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10079417' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/08/twitter.jpg' />
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/pop_five_green_album_muppets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/pop_five_green_album_muppets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: This week in cultural ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coen Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Night Lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're on the fence about: Fake teeth tattoos, Paula Abdul's inner warrior,  "Friday Night Lights'" secret endgame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly, and I have to make sure that I have no idea what is going on with <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/2012_elections/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/08/11/gop_debate_iowa">those Republican debates</a>. Is Michele Bachmann winning? Is that why <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist/index.html">her scary face was on Newsweek</a>? Oh man, what a world, what a world. Oh, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/09/london_riots_explained">London burned down too</a>! Come on, Earth, get it together!</p><p>If you've had enough of the depressing news for the week, feast those things in your ocular cavities on these 10 pop culture stories that we've culled from the Internet and beyond! (But mostly the Internet.) They aren't here to make you feel OK again, but maybe they'll take your mind off the fact that the world is going to hell in a hand basket.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/13/pop_torn_fergie_60_minutes_teeth_tattoos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

