Tyler Perry

The funny thing about black men in dresses

Why do black comedians like Tyler Perry, Eddie Murphy and Martin Lawrence don plus-size pantyhose and parade around as their feisty grandmas?

  • more
    • All Share Services

The funny thing about black men in dresses

Some of the most memorable women in black entertainment have been played by men. This drag tradition with roots in minstrelsy harks back to ’70s TV star Flip Wilson’s sassy Geraldine character, and most recently has hoisted chitlin auteur Tyler Perry’s Mabel Simmons, aka Madea, to superstardom. The sharp-tongued matriarch that Perry has portrayed in six hugely popular movies and a long-running TV show makes a cameo appearance in his new film, “Meet the Browns.”

Madea, the seemingly inimitable Aretha Franklin of faux femmes, has yet to inspire knockoffs, but similar drag acts continue to pop up — the corpulent Rasputia of Eddie Murphy’s “Norbit,” Keenan Thompson’s Virginiaca on “Saturday Night Live,” and Martin Lawrence’s repeat performance as Big Momma in “Big Momma’s House 2,” among others. By now, Hollywood drugstores may be running low on plus-size pantyhose.

Perry’s core audience began with middle-aged black women, introduced to Madea by the outrageous traveling theatrical shows that made her name. These faithful admirers, and the millions who have caught on since, still can’t get enough of the character, but others don’t like it hot. Some prominent black men in the entertainment business contend that there’s nothing funny about a manly grandma: They say the surefire laugh-garnering power of slipping a macho Negro into chiffon doesn’t represent anything but an effeminizing, racist spectacle.

Last year director John Singleton griped to Black Star News, “I’m tired of all these black men in dresses … How come nobody’s protesting that?” And comedian Dave Chappelle told Oprah Winfrey that during a shoot with Lawrence, the writers and producers had twisted his arm to do drag. “‘Every minute you waste costs this much money,’” he recalls them telling him. “The pressure comes in … I don’t need no dress to be funny,” he said. Chappelle also suggested that their insistence amounted to a “conspiracy,” and he got applause for implying a connection between cross-dressing and “Brokeback Mountain,” a film in which neither main character — both of whom are arguably bisexual — wears anything but hyper-masculine attire.

Chappelle’s comment both presumes that impersonating a woman will emasculate him, and that emasculation is equivalent to homosexuality (or at least gay sex, judging by his poorly chosen example). Despite Chappelle’s insinuation, it’s debatable whether this phenomenon has much to do with a gay sensibility. Perry has denied the abundant rumors about his sexuality, telling Essence magazine that having to fend off the speculation has “given [him] a firm seating in [his] manhood.” The newest breed of bruthas in drag has only the most tenuous connection to the decidedly queer cross-dressing entertainment craze of the ’90s, exemplified by Wigstock, “Priscilla, Queen of the Desert,” and “To Wong Foo” — the main difference being the emphasis on frumpiness.

When straight black comedians do drag, they aren’t trying to make women look fabulous. They reach for the floral housecoats and the chartreuse polyester pantsuits. It’s anyone’s guess why the no-nonsense old ladies hold more appeal for them — perhaps grandmotherly aggression and take-no-prisoners masculine attitude have more in common than meets the eye. The clumsy fashion sense is certainly a match.

Like Chappelle, blogger Darryl James sees the phenomenon as part of an effort to neutralize black masculinity. For him and a lot of other straight black men, gender-bending comedians are “castrated clowns,” whose emasculation makes them palatable to white people and man-hating black women alike. “The black man in drag is one of the new coons,” he writes. Never mind that he’s also one of the old coons — according to Marjorie Garber’s 1999 book, “Vested Interests,” the men who played women in minstrel shows were “the best-paid performers in the minstrel company.”

If the humor in minstrelsy arises in part from the reversal of class aspirations, then white men adopting the comic appearance of black women represents the ultimate topsy-turvy world. We consider upward mobility natural (even if we frown on strategies for advancement that include, say, passing for white), but downward mobility is crazy. And so a black man who plays the role of a black woman is also taking part in the ridicule of people who in some respects lie further down the social pecking order, in terms of gender if not economic power, mimicking discrimination by whites against people of color.

Minstrelsy has long been considered one of the most insulting forms of oppression, the classic addition of insult to injury. But it continues to occupy a strange position in American entertainment history: Though it originated with white performers, black performers eventually cornered the market on blackface after emancipation. By the beginning of the 20th century, the industry had morphed into a steady employer of unmasked black vaudevillians and set black performers on the road to mainstream acceptance. Like the blues, its history demonstrates the ability of black American artists to transform shame and pain into lucrative and significant new forms.

While many Americans still find minstrelsy appalling, it somehow never goes out of style. Nearly every year, a controversy erupts at an American college when white students decide to dress as blacks for Halloween. Sometimes a comedian creates an character like Thompson’s gluttonous, obtuse and ignorant Virginiaca, who tries to squeeze her teenage stepdaughter (played by Ellen Page, in a scary attempt to act ‘hood) into baby clothes, convinced that they’re hoochie attire.

What’s more, an act like Thompson’s, whose insult to black women is sanctioned by his blackness, may embolden white performers like Charles Knipp, who tours gay clubs in the South in both drag and blackface as the outrageous, mush-mouthed Shirley Q. Liquor. Talk about old school.

The worst type of black drag pays insufficient attention to the humanity of black women. Wilson, by contrast, redeemed his garishly clad soul-sister Geraldine by making sure she always came out on top, especially in opposition to the church and in subverting machismo — she even turned the king of braggadocio, Muhammad Ali, into a shrinking violet. The devil may have made Geraldine buy that dress, but she chastened her minister husband by reminding him that the Evil One also kept him employed.

For his part, Perry one-ups Geraldine by adding a bevy of down-home aphorisms to his portrayal of Madea. He also bolsters the character’s complexity in his movies with a cast that counters her irreverence with melodrama. Ella, Madea’s black female sidekick played by Cassie Davis, also helps to legitimize the character’s status as a black woman. Not only is the joke never on Madea, but her tendency to whip out a pistol or two when things get out of hand establishes her dominance over her home life. What makes Geraldine and Madea rise above caricature is that Wilson and Perry keep the audience on their side despite their characters’ ridiculous behavior, always increasing their credibility as characters — though not so much as women. Clearly, no one else can play Madea, but it’s tantalizing to wonder how differently her role would read if Perry cast an actual black woman in it.

What Chappelle and Singleton may miss out on by refusing to pimp those pumps is the dangerous fun of performing outside the constraints of race and gender. The desire to inhabit the lives and bodies of others doesn’t necessarily make you a racist any more than sporting a double-D cup makes a man love men. Often it is inspired by a sense of play, and sometimes it is meant to increase understanding. Actors and writers, especially novelists, frequently do it (with words) to serve progressive political ends — solo performers Danny Hoch and Anna Deavere Smith frequently channel characters regardless of ethnicity or sex.

But play with volatile social norms like race and gender, to paraphrase dramatist Suzan-Lori Parks, and they play right back. Sometimes they beat you at your own game. Knipp, for example, claims he created Shirley Q. Liquor “in celebration of … black women”; however, his tacky parody, in which he’s made up like a mandrill and drunk as a skunk, doesn’t bear out this claim. It would be hypocritical to say that white men shouldn’t dress as black women if they feel it’s their calling — when black drag queen RuPaul achieved his dream of being a white lady, no one cried foul. But the most successful would-be cross-dresser can create a character without perpetuating a stereotype.

We’re never going to get rid of minstrelsy in all its bizarre forms — it’s part of America’s cultural DNA, and we’d lose a shocking and vital performance style by attempting to wipe it out simply because it makes us uncomfortable or angry. But as Perry and Madea have proven, we can certainly reinvent it and perhaps give ourselves a makeover in the process.

Related video: The success of the Tyler Perry brand

James Hannaham is a staff writer at Salon.

The Tyler Perry juggernaut

How did an African-American playwright, nearly unknown to white America, become one of Hollywood's most successful filmmakers?

  • more
    • All Share Services

In this week’s Beyond the Multiplex/IFC video, Matt Singer and I take a look at the complicated — and amazing — story of Tyler Perry, the writer, director and star of box-office smashes like “Madea’s Family Reunion,” “Why Did I Get Married?” and the new “Meet the Browns.”

Perry began writing plays as a teenager in New Orleans, and spent many years writing and directing touring productions aimed at African-American audiences. He emerges from a venerable tradition in black theater, one based in moralistic, often religious melodramas aimed at a wide popular audience — and also one that remains almost invisible to white Americans.

Whatever you make of his movies as art or entertainment, Perry’s successful translation of his stage work into box-office hit films is one of the great stories of Hollywood entrepreneurship in recent decades. And it proves that the massive conglomerates that dominate the entertainment economy still can’t predict or control what audiences actually want to see.

(Subscribe to the Beyond the Multiplex video podcast through iTunes or RSS.)

Continue Reading Close

Obama: Don’t pander to homophobes

In a bid for the black church vote, the candidate is about to tour South Carolina with antigay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin at his side. He doesn't need to.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Obama: Don't pander to homophobes

Sen. Barack Obama‘s decision to tour South Carolina with gospel entertainer Donnie McClurkin, a self-proclaimed “former homosexual” who believes it is his mission to turn gays straight, suggests that Obama can’t live without the support of the homophobic contingent of the black community and the black church in particular. But African-American politicians have already proved that black support is not contingent on homophobia. Few people remember that in 2004, the only presidential candidate besides Dennis Kucinich to support gay marriage was the Rev. Al Sharpton — both a mainstream black leader and a minister. Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Obama have all spoken out in favor of gay rights and against black homophobia. So does including McClurkin on his “Embrace the Change” tour signal a retreat on Obama’s part? Can tacking on an appearance by the openly gay Rev. Andy Sidden make up for McClurkin? (And wouldn’t you love to be backstage on this tour?)

It may be that the realpolitik of the black church operates more subtly than the Obama campaign has yet understood. There has always been a certain degree of “give” between sacred and secular black culture. The overly serious demagogues are almost always cut down to size by larger-than-life fictional counterparts. For every Rev. Willie Wilson, the homophobic Washington, D.C., minister who claimed that lesbianism was “about to take over” the black community, there’s a Sherman Hemsley playing hothead Deacon Ernest Frye on the sitcom “Amen,” with black viewers laughing along. For every Donnie McClurkin, there’s a pop-culture hero like Tyler Perry’s drag matriarch Madea. The media tends to use the black church as a barometer of community standards, but I think in real life, black people compartmentalize more than they get credit for, the way many Irish Catholics balance their deep faith with their deep irony. Preachers may denounce gays on Sunday, but on Saturday night, a certain percentage of the congregation rented “Madea’s Family Reunion,” or danced and drank all night listening to R. Kelly’s “Trapped in the Closet.” Black culture can accommodate everything from the Winans and McClurkin to Richard Pryor and Prince, who gets away with bawdy liberalism, gender-bending and old-time religion, too.

Black American churchgoers may absorb homophobic rhetoric, and preachers may promote fear and misunderstanding, like Wilson, who claimed of lesbianism, “It ain’t real.” (As if he would know.) But the more general message of the black church seems to be that one should love the sinner and not the sin, and that Jesus can change homosexuals. These mandates may be misguided, but they are thankfully nonviolent, thanks to the legacy of Dr. King. Moreover, few black evangelicals here pounce on the issue with as much intolerance and vitriol as the religious in Nigeria or Jamaica, for example, where the church promotes violence against gays and homo homicide is even celebrated in the campaign songs of political parties. The ersatz black Jerry Falwells and Jesse Helmses, like Wilson, Chicago’s Bishop Eddie Long and Los Angeles’ Bishop Noel Jones, don’t represent mainstream black thought the way those who touched the hem of MLK’s garment, like Jesse Jackson, do.

Note that the backlash at Sidden’s inclusion has not come from black church organizations so much as gay groups criticizing Obama for retaining McClurkin. McClurkin, for his part, hasn’t even pulled out in response, though Obama has virtually done somersaults to justify McClurkin’s inclusion. On Thursday, as the tour began, Obama supporters from the African-American religious community and LGBT campaign leaders collaborated on a letter to the public that attempted to clarify their candidate‘s decision to keep McClurkin onboard, stating, “We believe that the only way for these two sides to find common ground is to do so together.”

Obama’s gay advocates obviously support him regardless of this fumble. But his gay critics are right to ask why he thinks getting homosexuals to sit at the same table with antigay and allegedly “ex-gay” Christians represents some kind of balance. Had McClurkin been a Holocaust denier, my money says Obama would be “embracing a change” in his tour’s entertainment lineup, lickety-split.

It shouldn’t surprise anyone that Obama is playing to both sides — that seems to be what he’s best at. He means well, but you know what they say about the highways in hell. However, adding Sidden to the mix without giving McClurkin the shaft was enough of an afterthought to incense the gay community without fixing the problem. Did Obama overestimate the depth of the black community’s homophobia and unintentionally solidify the stereotype about him — that he’s the white man’s black candidate? Well, if Sharpton refuses to pander to the homophobic faction of the black church, why should anybody else?

Continue Reading Close

James Hannaham is a staff writer at Salon.

The new Amos ‘n’ Andy?

Critics hate Tyler Perry's outrageous comedies, but his black fans love them. Is Perry a stereotype-spouting minstrel -- or a smart writer and actor who knows how to connect with his audience?

  • more
    • All Share Services

The new Amos 'n' Andy?

Blacks and whites don’t always understand each other. But in Hollywood, everyone’s favorite color is green. So movie executives of all races took notice last February when a movie called “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” hit No. 1 at the box office — despite no bankable stars, scant mainstream press attention and reviews that were almost laughably bad.

“Downright awful,” “an absolute mess” and “one of the worst pictures in ages,” critics wailed. Salon’s Stephanie Zacharek called it “the sort of movie that’s so bad, you just wish it would go away.” Roger Ebert was offended by the movie’s star, a “Big Momma’s House”-style granny named Madea, who smokes reefer, keeps a pistol in her purse and slices up furniture with a chain saw. This “Grandma from Hell,” as Ebert called her, was played in drag by the film’s 6-foot-5 writer-producer-mastermind, Tyler Perry. “All blame returns to Perry,” Ebert wrote. “What was he thinking?”

But there was no arguing the numbers. Perry made “Diary” on a shoestring $5.5 million budget, and as of last April it had grossed some $50 million. Perry’s distributor, Lions Gate Films, quickly greenlighted $10 million for a sequel, “Madea’s Family Reunion,” which hits theaters Feb. 24. Now the suits are thinking franchise. “We’ve got Tyler fever,” says Lions Gate head of production Michael Paseornek. “As far as we’re concerned, the last weekend of February belongs to Tyler Perry, and we plan to be there every year.”

What shocked Hollywood insiders was how Perry seemed to come out of nowhere. In the wake of the “Diary” success, the Hollywood trade paper Variety wrote a story that led off, “Tyler who?” Paseornek had been asking himself the same question a year before, after he received a letter from Perry’s agent, talking about a guy who wrote plays for African-American audiences on the “chitlin circuit,” a name that goes back to Jim Crow days, when African-Americans were banned from mainstream auditoriums. Nowadays, Perry’s plays regularly sell out major venues such as New York’s Beacon Theater and the Kodak Theatre in Los Angeles, where the Oscars are held, and in the last eight years, they’ve grossed more than $100 million through ticket sales and DVDs of live performances sold through his Web site.

“It was an astronomical number for someone I’d never heard of,” Paseornek recalls, “so I called around to other people in showbiz, and they hadn’t heard of him either.”

But those people were white. Paseornek got his first insight into the Perry phenomenon when he walked down the hall to the Lions Gate inventory control department, to talk to an African-American employee named Kenya Watson. “She said, ‘Sure, I’ve heard of Tyler Perry,’” he recalls. “‘I own all his DVDs. Whenever we have a cookout, we put one on.’”

“When I first went to the studios,” Perry told Salon in a recent phone interview, “they told me my fans didn’t go to movies.” But actually, his audience — hardworking, family-oriented, Christian African-American women — had just been waiting for someone to make a movie they would like, and Perry used his own powerful marketing apparatus to get the fans out for “Diary.” In the weeks leading up to the film’s release, there were constant ads on black radio stations and Perry reached out to the more than 500,000 fans who’ve signed up on his Web site’s e-mail list. “Every week or so, we tell them what’s going on,” Perry says of his fan base, adding that a similar countdown has been underway for “Family Reunion.” He also talked to pastors at some of the country’s most important African-American megachurches, with whom he says he has “really good relationships”; they got the word out, sometimes even talking about “Diary” from the pulpit. Church auxiliaries started buying group tickets and making plans to see “Diary” en masse.

“People forget that churchgoing folks like to be entertained,” says Tamara McLaurin, a 32-year-old catering sales manager at the Atlanta convention center. The release of “Diary” was a major event for McLaurin and the other women in her church’s “dance ministry,” a group that dances during services. They were traveling to perform that weekend, watched four Perry DVDs in a row on the bus, and then piled into a multiplex to cheer “Diary.” “We called it ‘Tyler Perry Day,’ ” recalls McLaurin, who now owns a “Diary” DVD that she still watches about once a week — “just in the background, while I do things around the house.”

“These people were desperate to be spoken to,” says Boston Globe film critic Wesley Morris. “When something came along that was even remotely relevant, they threw all their weight behind it, even though it was a shittily made movie.” Morris didn’t like “Diary.” “Blows to the head are delivered with more subtlety,” he wrote in his review. He also happens to be African-American, but as soon as his review came out, he says, he got phone calls and e-mails from Perry fans who accused him of being white — and a racist at that. The fans were even harsher when they knew for sure that the critic was white. Ebert, who is married to an African-American woman and has long been a champion for black cinema, received so much angry e-mail and became such a lightning rod because of his negative “Diary” review that Perry felt compelled, during a visit to Chicago, to plead with his fans to lay off the guy.

All this devotion has meant gold for Perry, the 36-year-old son of a New Orleans house builder, who now lives in an Atlanta mansion he calls Avec Chateau (“with house”) as a reminder of the days when he was homeless, living in his Geo Metro and scraping together money to produce his first show. Perry’s rise from difficult beginnings, about which much has been written, is a vital part of his mythology. As a child, he was abused by his father — “The first 28 years of my life, I don’t remember ever being happy,” he says — and he started to write after hearing Oprah Winfrey talk about how cathartic it is to put your troubles on paper. The result was “I Know I’ve Been Changed,” a gospel musical about adult survivors of child abuse, which Perry produced at venues around the country for six years, without much success. Perry was so discouraged, he has said, he contemplated suicide. But he collected enough money for one last production, at the Atlanta House of Blues in 1998, and on the first night, he looked out the dressing-room window and saw a line snaking around the corner. The show wound up selling out all eight performances. Perry was on his way.

Eight years later, he’s on top of the world. In addition to promoting “Madea’s Family Reunion,” Perry is currently putting the final touches on his first book, “Don’t Make a Black Woman Take Off Her Earrings” (coming from Riverhead in April), writing his third movie, “Daddy’s Little Girls” (due next February), finishing his ninth play, “What’s Done in the Dark” (which should hit the road by September), and working on a proposal for a children’s animated series. And Perry still travels the country constantly, performing Madea live to 2,000-seat audiences. In his current touring production, “Madea Goes to Jail,” Perry spends at least half the show as the center of attention, stomping around the stage in drag, yelling, shooting off pistols and improvising huge chunks of dialogue.

As soon as he gets offstage, he switches to business mode. “I’ve had phone meetings with Tyler where I can hear the audience laughing in the background,” Paseornek says. “We’ll talk for a while, and then he’s like, ‘I have to go. I’m due onstage.’ ” When Salon spoke to Perry earlier this month, he was in a South Carolina hotel room, still exhausted from the previous night’s performance. “Where am I?” he said. “Charleston, I guess.”

After all that time in front of his fans, Perry knows them well; his plays are calibrated to please them. The actresses in his shows look like his audience. They are what that Dove soap ad campaign calls “real women” with “real curves.” On the other hand, the men are fantasy types, with ridiculously cut bodybuilder torsos. Perry’s story lines are also designed to satisfy his fans, many of whom have experienced plenty of tragedy. In “Madea Goes to Jail,” we meet good-hearted Katie, who’s in jail because of some sad mistakes. Madea meets Katie there and agrees to check in on Katie’s rebellious 16-year-old daughter, Toni. Madea winds up taking Toni in as a foster child, to get her away from a father who is threatening to pimp her out on the street. We also spend time with Madea’s nephew, Sonny, who works as a jail guard and puts up with a slutty wife, Vanessa. She goes to bed with Sonny’s co-worker and gets so wrapped up in her illicit passion that she ignores the cries of their 6-month-old child, who winds up almost drowning in the bathtub.

These messed-up youngsters drive the plot of “Madea Goes to Jail,” but the real stars are their mothers and aunts, who worry, fret and pray to Jesus for help. That is, unless they’re the no-nonsense Madea (who has nothing to do with Euripides’ “Medea,” by the way). Whenever she comes across a villain like Vanessa, Madea does just what you might want to do — kick her in the ass. In the theatrical version of “Madea’s Family Reunion,” she catches a Vanessa-like tramp seducing the husband of her best friend’s daughter — and chases her out of the yard with a couple of gunshots and an Eastwood-worthy catchphrase. “Girl, you like Skittles?” she yells, brandishing the pistol. “Well, taste the rainbow!”

Perry’s audience loves nothing more than a Madea rampage, and Perry milks it for every bit of fun. After the tramp runs away, Madea tries to calm herself down by rolling a joint, but it doesn’t work. “I said I wasn’t going to bother nobody,” she tells her friend. “But that woman done worked on my nerves.” Madea paces, waves her gun in the air and gets so angry that her enormous fake breasts bounce up and down. “She done worked — on — my — nerves,” Madea bounces, as the audience falls out with laughter. “I ain’t lying,” she says. “I’m ready to go to jail to-day.”

In a Perry stage show, this mix of serious and slapstick is all part of the over-the-top experience, along with the shirtless hunks, the melodramatic stories — and especially the roof-raising gospel music. Perry’s shows feature a live band, an enormous sound system and a cast that can seriously belt. Every few minutes, a character breaks out with a number that starts in sorrowful lamentation and builds to a joyful climax that gets the audience to their feet, pumping their hands and praising the Lord.

But the fun of the stage shows doesn’t necessarily translate to the movies. Lions Gate had no advance press screenings of the film version of “Madea’s Family Reunion” in New York (a clear sign that they’re expecting bad reviews) but Perry says that, like “Diary,” it features a lot less singing and a lot less Madea than the stage version. “I’m not trying to duplicate the theater experience,” he says.

But maybe he should try. “Diary,” which was directed by music-video veteran Darren Grant, is a sentimental and often boring melodrama that comes alive only when Madea is on-screen. Perry directed “Family Reunion” himself, but to truly capture the divine madness of his plays, he needs to take some daring risks that neither he nor his audience is probably ready for. Making his next film a full-on musical and putting Madea front and center would help. But the Boston Globe’s Morris has an even nuttier idea: “I think John Waters should direct his movies,” he says, with a laugh. “What you have now is trash that doesn’t know it’s trash. Someone like Waters or Pedro Almodóvar could take that trash and transform it into art.”

Perry’s plays convey a Christian message. They’re firmly rooted in the tradition of other chitlin circuit gospel shows such as “My Grandmother Prayed for Me,” “God Don’t Like Ugly” and “Why Good Girls Like Bad Boyz.” But while those plays can be preachy, Perry keeps things lively with Madea, who has nothing but contempt for Christianity. (“When are we getting you to church?” a reverend asks Madea in one of the shows. “When you put in a smoking section,” she snaps back.) That irreverence works just fine for Perry’s fans. “I know Madea is crazy,” says Bishop Paul Morton of New Orleans’ Greater St. Stephen Full Gospel Baptist Church, the congregation in which Perry grew up, “but somebody always comes to God in the end.”

Making a non-churchgoer the star of a Christian-themed show is an intriguing choice. And Perry sets himself apart in other ways as well, most notably by investing in a talented cast and strong production values. “When I came out on the circuit eight years ago, most of the plays had horrible acting, horrible sound, horrible writing, horrible everything,” he recalls. “The audiences were only half-full because they had been burned so many times.”

Transcending the worst parts of his genre, Perry has earned the respect of some major players in the highbrow black theater world. “Tyler goes way beyond the clichés,” says Woodie King, founder and artistic director of New York’s Tony Award-winning New Federal Theatre. “When Madea is trying to convince a girl to change her life, there’s an honesty and brilliance. He taps into that wisdom of our grandmothers and mothers, and we sit there and say, ‘Yes.’ ”

Others just say no. Gary Anderson, the founder and artistic director of Detroit’s respected Plowshares Theatre, finds the Perry phenomenon offensive. He believes Perry’s characters can be traced back to the insulting caricatures of Jim Crow-era minstrel shows. “He has the lazy coon, the pickaninny and the loose woman who wants everyone’s man,” says Anderson, adding that he sees Madea as a modern update on Sapphire, the nagging wife in that nadir of mid-20th-century racist stereotyping “The Amos ‘n’ Andy Show.” “If a white person wrote these scripts, my community would be in outrage. I find it no less stinging that a black man wrote it.”

Carlton Molette, a professor of dramatic arts and senior fellow of the Institute for African-American Studies at the University of Connecticut, takes a more favorable view. “I think some black people just hate to see other black folks laugh in public because they’re afraid white folks won’t take us seriously,” he says. Molette teaches the stage version of “Madea’s Family Reunion” alongside works by August Wilson and Amiri Baraka and sees a lot to like in Perry’s work. “When white people see crime in the black part of town, they tend to forget that a lot of the people living there are hardworking, middle-class people who are appalled by what’s going on around them,” he says. “These are Tyler’s fans. He doesn’t cry about their situation. He says, ‘This is our world. We have to live in it. Let’s laugh at the ironies that exist and have a good life to the best of our abilities.’”

Perry’s success at the multiplex has already started to change Hollywood. Other studios are starting to look for their own Tyler Perrys. Last October, Screen Gems signed a deal with chitlin circuit regular David E. Talbert for a movie called “First Sunday” about a couple of bumbling criminals who rob their local church.

Meanwhile, Perry’s newfound power has brought a new responsibility that may move Perry away from the character that made him famous. He has begun to tone down some of his more extreme impulses. Four years ago, the theatrical version of “Madea’s Family Reunion” featured a running gag about a crack baby and how ugly it was. But that shtick now embarrasses Perry. “Imagine if you were the child of parents who used drugs,” he says. “How would it make you feel?” The crack baby isn’t in the movie version of “Family Reunion,” and neither are Madea’s guns. Perry made that change after a recent shopping mall encounter with a mother and her young son. “This boy pointed his finger at me like it was a gun, and he said, ‘Rock-a-bye, baby,’ which is a Madea line,” Perry recalls. “When I saw that, I thought, ‘All right, no more guns.’ If parents aren’t going to be responsible for what’s taken in, then I need to be.”

And Madea herself may be retiring. When Perry appeared on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” in late January, he announced that his alter ego wouldn’t be in either his next movie or his next play: He’s sick of putting on a fat suit and women’s makeup every day. “It has been six years, 250 to 300 shows a year,” Perry told Winfrey, who has become a major supporter. “I need a break. I need to check in with Tyler.”

Continue Reading Close

Russell Scott Smith is a freelance writer in New York.

“Diary of a Mad Black Woman”

Will Tyler Perry's religion-infused comedy spawn a completely new genre: Churchotainment?

  • more
    • All Share Services

“Diary of a Mad Black Woman” is a movie whose existence, and whose significance in our social and political culture, you can’t ignore. It’s also the sort of movie that’s so bad, you just wish it would go away.

“Diary” was written by Tyler Perry, the enormously successful playwright — you could almost call him a playwright-entrepreneur — who attracts a large African-American audience with his plays about relationships and emotional growth layered with broad religious overtones. In “Diary,” Kimberly Elise plays Helen, who for 19 years has been a good, dutiful wife to rich, successful lawyer Charles (Steve Harris). But he treats her cruelly, and even throws her out of the home they share so he can install his mistress and two illegitimate kids.

Helen flees to the house of her grandmother, Madea (Perry himself, in “Nutty Professor”-style drag), a gun-totin’, tough-talkin’ granny nobody dares to mess with. Helen rebuilds her life, exacts revenge on her husband and, ultimately, learns the importance of forgiveness. There’s also a lively church scene in which the lame walk, and an ex-junkie shows up, cleaned up and wearing a pretty dress, to sing the praises of the Almighty in the aisles.

This is the first movie made from original Perry material, and it’s clearly meant to be a crowd-pleasing, uplifting dramatic entertainment. Perry doesn’t have any delusions of artistry, and potentially, at least, that’s refreshing. But any points he earns for lack of pretense are immediately gobbled up by his lack of subtlety.

Everything in “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” is exaggerated for the audience’s pleasure, resulting only in its exhaustion. “Get the hell outta my car,” Charles barks at Helen, dropping her off at their lavish home after the two have attended a swanky dinner in his honor, during which he’s been the very picture of an angelic husband. Later, when he kicks her out of the house, clothes and all (having already moved the brand-new wardrobe of his mistress into his wife’s huge walk-in closets), he snarls, “Now be a lady and leave quietly.” These are all cues for the audience — and there’s no doubt “Diary” is aimed chiefly at women — to boo and hiss and acknowledge that, damn, this is one really bad guy. We need only one or two of these cues, but Perry lays them on thick.

Then the sermonizing begins. When Helen, who has been cut off from her family for years, on Charles’ orders, runs into her shivering, twitching junkie cousin, she asks Madea, “What happened to her?” The answer, intoned with great gravity: “Life.” And it takes Helen forever to recognize that she’s not to blame for the failure of her marriage. Long past the point where guilt would be an issue (and past the point where the audience expects it to be an issue), she’s still reciting embroidered samplerisms like “I always thought that if I did the best I could, God would bless my marriage.”

This is director Darren Grant’s first feature, and it has a naive, amateurish feel — that kind of first-picture awkwardness can sometimes be charming and energizing, but here it just feels hokey. (It’s worth noting, though, that cinematographer David Claessen gives the picture a polished, professional look, and he captures Elise’s effervescence beautifully.) “Diary” is intentionally broad — by design, it’s supposed to incite the audience to yell and whoop at the screen — but it mushrooms into pure ridiculousness and still expects us to treat it seriously. Hardest to take is the way some very fine actors, among them Elise (“Beloved,” “The Manchurian Candidate”), Harris (best known for “The Practice”) and the great, little-seen Cicely Tyson (whose performance in “Sounder,” more than 30 years ago, is the kind you never forget in a lifetime) are forced to plow through the movie’s viscous religiosity, as opposed to just playing ordinary people in tough circumstances — which is plenty for any actor to handle right there.

But as lousy as it is, “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” is weirdly fascinating. From a political standpoint, most secular white liberals don’t like to think much about what religion means in black communities (or in white ones, for that matter). After last November, in particular, religion, or at least those nebulous wraiths known as “religious beliefs,” became the great bugaboo of most of us on the left: We like our church and state very cleanly divided, for obvious reasons.

But churches aren’t strictly religious organs — they’re communities, too, and although “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” overdoes its “Jesus is the answer” message, it does capture a sense of the cultural and moral conservatism (if not political conservatism) that these communities cling to. That conservatism is a fact of life in our country, and while some of us may not like it, denying its existence gets us nowhere.

“Diary of a Mad Black Woman” shows that conservatism in full force. But if Perry knows what his audience wants, and gives it to them in buckets, he at least has a sense of humor about it. In the guise of his character Madea (her name, incidentally, is an endearment truncated from “My dear” — not a play on “Medea”), he delivers some sly zingers about the dangers of blind reliance on Scripture. At one point Madea (who has pendulous breasts and gray grandma hair and is very fond of the handgun she keeps in her handbag, which she brandishes gleefully with little prompting) launches into a tirade about how she tried to read the Bible once and had to put it down, because “Jesus talks too much.”

As Madea, Perry is often hilarious (particularly in a scene where she and Helen wreak revenge on Charles by sawing every piece of furniture in his living room in half — it may be broad, but it works). But Perry’s sense of humor doesn’t surface as often as it needs to. When Helen meets a nice new guy (Shemar Moore) and finds herself sexually attracted to him, she writes in her diary how lucky she is to have found a man who’s “strong, beautiful, sensitive and Christian” — this, after noting “Dear Diary, This man is FINE.” We can’t just take pleasure in the fact that Helen has found a nice guy who turns her on — his attributes need to be spelled out for us in a dry laundry list.

If “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” turns out to be a hit with its intended audience, it may spawn a completely new genre. We already have infotainment. “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” may be the beginning of churchotainment, a genre that invites us to laugh, to cry, to feel and, ultimately, to accept God into our hearts. Still, if He does exist, He surely deserves a much better movie than this one. “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” is potent enough to make the lame walk and the blind see, if only in the mad rush for the Exit sign.

Continue Reading Close

Stephanie Zacharek is a senior writer for Salon Arts & Entertainment.

Page 2 of 2 in Tyler Perry