<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Unemployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/unemployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s easy to get fired in America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/its_easy_to_get_fired_in_america_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/its_easy_to_get_fired_in_america_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outside Montana, you can be fired for the color of your shirt, or even for refusing to fetch your boss a coffee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>Don’t get too comfy at your desk, your job might not be as secure as you think. Anecdotal reports from labor lawyers and a few polls show that most Americans believe their bosses must have a good reason to kick them to the curb. We labor under the illusion of what Harvard labor economist Richard Freeman calls, “there’s-got-to-be-a-law syndrome.” We don’t want to believe someone can be fired because her boss finds her sexually irresistible. In every other industrialized democracy, that couldn’t legally happen, but in 49 of the 50 states there is no law requiring a just or reasonable cause for employee termination.</p><p>Most Americans can be legally fired for almost any reason. Private sector workplace relationships tend to operate under the standard of employment-at-will, which means you can be fired for the color of your shirt, your political views, supporting your favorite sports team or for refusing to fetch your boss a cup of coffee. The Bill of Rights does not apply to your office.   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/its_easy_to_get_fired_in_america_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/its_easy_to_get_fired_in_america_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs report: Unemployment rate falls to 7.5 percent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jobs_report_unemployment_rate_falls_to_7_5_percent_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jobs_report_unemployment_rate_falls_to_7_5_percent_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. employers added as many as 165,000 jobs in April]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. employers added 165,000 jobs in April, and hiring was much stronger in the previous two months than first thought. The gains trimmed the unemployment rate to a four-year low of 7.5 percent.</p><p>The Labor Department report showed the job market is improving despite higher taxes and government spending cuts.</p><p>In addition to the April gains, the government said employers added 138,000 jobs in March and 332,000 in February. That's 114,000 more over the two months.</p><p>The economy has created an average of 208,000 jobs a month from November through April. That's above the 138,000 added in the previous six months.</p><p>A fire overnight at the Labor Department's headquarters shut down the building for most employees. Members of the media were allowed in for the release of the report.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jobs_report_unemployment_rate_falls_to_7_5_percent_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jobs_report_unemployment_rate_falls_to_7_5_percent_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret to happiness: &#8220;I want this job for a week&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/secret_to_happiness_i_want_this_job_for_a_week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/secret_to_happiness_i_want_this_job_for_a_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Krznaric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alain de Botton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School of life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can we be fulfilled at work? A British theorist argues that we should experiment, not specialize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for meaningful, fulfilling work? Good luck. With unemployment at 7.7 percent, anything that keeps us off the bread lines should be counted as a victory.</p><p>So it seems like an inopportune time to think about changing jobs, if you’re lucky enough to have one, or being very picky if you don’t. But Roman Krznaric, a British author, empathy theorist and “lifestyle philosopher,” thinks he has the solution.</p><p>Krznaric’s book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1250030692/?tag=saloncom08-20">“How to Find Fulfilling Work”</a> is an entry in the School of Life, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/">Alain de Botton’s series of self-help books</a> for people who wouldn’t be caught dead in the self-help section. In it, Krznaric argues that the way we’ve been trained to find our life’s work is completely wrong. He takes issue in particular with the personality tests administered by career counselors to judge one’s strengths and interests. They’re complete bunk, Krznaric argues, pointing out that you’ve got a 50 percent chance of being placed in a different personality category if you retake the test.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/secret_to_happiness_i_want_this_job_for_a_week/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/secret_to_happiness_i_want_this_job_for_a_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t be fooled by today&#8217;s economic growth report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The economy may have expanded at a rate of 2.5 percent over the first quarter, but that's unlikely to last]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As expected, the economy grew more quickly at the beginning of this year than at the end of 2012, according to this morning’s GDP release.  Real GDP was up at a yearly rate of 2.5% over the first quarter, compared to a mere 0.4% in the prior three months.</p><p>But only slightly beneath the surface, the report showed continuing weaknesses in the US economy and, consistent with the unexpectedly weak March jobs report, hints at another softening of demand in recent months.  Expectations were for growth above 3% but disposable income, a critical driver of growth in our 70% consumption economy, fell sharply, down 5% in real terms, partly due the loss of the payroll tax break.</p><p>The two main factors propelling the economy forward last quarter were firms restocking their shelves (inventory build-up adds to GDP growth) and strong spending by the stalwart American consumer, drawing not on their income but on their savings.  Since the inventory component is both highly volatile and less indicative of current demand, it’s useful to look at final demand, essentially GDP without the inventory build-up.  This measure grew 1.5% in real terms in the first quarter, down from 1.9% in the last quarter.  Again, this less volatile measure tracks demand more closely than the headline number.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. economy expands 2.5 percent through first quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But government spending has fallen, and the combination of tax increases and budget cuts could slow future growth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. economic growth accelerated to an annual rate of 2.5 percent from January through March, buoyed by the strongest consumer spending in more than two years. Government spending fell, though, and tax increases and federal budget cuts could slow growth later this year.</p><p>The Commerce Department said Friday that the economy rebounded from an anemic 0.4 percent annual growth rate in the October-December quarter. Consumer spending surged at an annual rate of 3.2 percent — its biggest jump since the end of 2010.</p><p>Growth was also helped by businesses, which responded to the greater demand by rebuilding their stockpiles. And home construction rose further.</p><p>Government spending sank at a 4.1 percent annual rate, led by another deep cut in defense spending. The decline kept last quarter's increase in economic growth below expectations of a 3 percent rate or more.</p><p>Many economists say they think growth as measured by the gross domestic product is slowing in the April-June quarter to an annual rate of just 2 percent. Most foresee growth remaining around that subpar level for the rest of the year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where our tax dollars should go</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/tk_5_partner_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/tk_5_partner_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money spent on the military and federal debt interest can be redirected to education and job creation. Here's how]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After heroic feats of arithmetic and a your-guess-is-as-good-as-mine interpretation of opaque rules and guidelines, millions of Americans will file their taxes by this Monday, April 15th.</p><p>Then there’s the bad news.</p><p>For anyone who takes a peek at where his or her <a href="http://nationalpriorities.org/en/analysis/2013/taxday-2013/" target="_blank">income tax dollars are going</a>, Tax Day can be maddening. Outsized chunks of our taxes fund the military, rising healthcare costs, and interest on the federal debt. Comparatively tiny amounts go to education, science, alternative energy, and the environment.</p><p>Category by category, this is contrary to what Americans want -- and what we the people want is pretty clear. Despite near-constant news about how polarized our nation is, a careful look at opinion polls indicates that a strong majority of Americans actually have a coherent to-do list for Washington: we want more jobs, smaller deficits, more education funding, reduced reliance on fossil fuels, higher taxes on the wealthiest, plus -- the kicker -- Medicare and Social Security benefits preserved. You know, it’s the typical story of wanting to have our cake and gobble it down, too. Right?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/tk_5_partner_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/tk_5_partner_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLK&#8217;s &#8220;Two Americas&#8221; truer than ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLK Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Two Americas"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The inequality King highlighted continues to grow worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may think you know about Martin Luther King, Jr., but there is much about the man and his message we have conveniently forgotten. He was a prophet, like Amos, Isaiah and Jeremiah of old, calling kings and plutocrats to account — speaking truth to power.</p><p>King was only 39 when he was murdered in Memphis 45 years ago, on April 4th, 1968. The 1963 March on Washington and the 1965 March from Selma to Montgomery were behind him. So was the successful passage of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act. In the last year of his life, as he moved toward Memphis and his death, he announced what he called the Poor People’s Campaign, a “multi-racial army” that would come to Washington, build an encampment and demand from Congress an “Economic Bill of Rights” for all Americans — black, white, or brown. He had long known that the fight for racial equality could not be separated from the need for economic equity — fairness for all, including working people and the poor.</p><p>Martin Luther King, Jr., had more than a dream — he envisioned what America could be, if only it lived up to its promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for each and every citizen. That’s what we have conveniently forgotten as the years have passed and his reality has slowly been shrouded in the marble monuments of sainthood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should I offer to help?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/should_i_offer_to_help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/should_i_offer_to_help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My nephew lost his job. If I give him money, will it hurt his pride?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>My nephew just lost his job, the second time in two years. He held his first job for almost 20 years and then in 2011 his company cut back. He got a second job, but this has not worked out. I was also unemployed in 2011. My nephew offered me financial assistance and he was the only family member who did. Fortunately, I did not have to take anything from him. I would like to help him now by giving him a check for $5,000 to help him get through this -- but will I be hurting his pride? Should I just stay out of it? </strong></p><p><strong>Generous but Sensitive</strong></p><p>Dear Generous but Sensitive,</p><p>Was your pride hurt when he offered to help you? It sounds like you felt grateful -- and surprised that he was the only one in the family who offered. Perhaps he will feel as you did.</p><p>Why didn't the rest of the family offer to help you? Were they thinking, "Oh, don't offer to help, it's a matter of pride"? A lot of good that did.</p><p>So offer to help. Offer to help and if you are refused then find little ways to help anyway. Find things you can do. It may be that a lump sum of $5,000 is not needed yet, but let him know the money is available if he needs it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/should_i_offer_to_help/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/should_i_offer_to_help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>`Target the underemployed, not just the unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To reinvigorate the labor market, we have to help underutilized and part-time workers as well as those without jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we wanted to target the persistent slack in the labor market, though I can’t see any signs that we do, we shouldn’t just target the unemployment rate; we should also go after the <em>under</em>employment rate.  Since it captures the important dimension of not just do you have a job, but are you getting the hours of work you want, it’s a more comprehensive measure of the extent to which workers are underutilized – i.e., slack – in the labor market.</p><p>The difference is pretty well known by now: the underemployment rate includes various groups of underutilized workers or job seekers who are left out of the official rate.  The largest difference is the inclusion of part-time workers who would rather have full-time jobs.  Most recently, there were about 8 million such folks, elevating this measure of underutilization to around 14 percent compared to about 8 percent for unemployment (2013Q1).  Other components of this rate include discouraged workers who’ve recently looked for work but given up, and some other smaller groups that are neither working nor looking for work but remain marginally attached to the job market.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Great Depression help solve our unemployment crisis?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/a_disaster_in_slow_motion_understanding_our_unemployment_crisis_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/a_disaster_in_slow_motion_understanding_our_unemployment_crisis_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Works Progress Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Class]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government programs like the Works Progress Administration offer a blueprint to fix our fractured economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question we must ask today<ins cite="mailto:Richard%20Kirsch" datetime="2013-04-08T12:10">,</ins> as we remember the Works Progress Administration is: why isn’t there the political will to take dramatic steps to address today’s jobs emergency?<br /> <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a></p><p>Let’s start with the obvious; there was a far greater share of Americans unemployed in the Great Depression. In 1934, unemployment <a href="http://www.shmoop.com/great-depression/statistics.html">peaked at 24.9%.</a>  One-out-of-four people officially out of work is much more of a crisis than one-out-of ten (9.6%), the peak in the current recession <a href="http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU04000000?years_option=all_years&amp;periods_option=specific_periods&amp;periods=Annual+Data">in 2010</a>. The impact is even greater than two-and-a-half times, as such a huge drop in consumer spending means that marginal businesses able to survive 10% unemployment rates were swept away in the Depression. And during the Depression – much more than now – it was impossible not to know people whose lives had been devastated.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/a_disaster_in_slow_motion_understanding_our_unemployment_crisis_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/a_disaster_in_slow_motion_understanding_our_unemployment_crisis_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arkansas pushes forward with bill to drug test unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/arkansas_pushes_forward_with_bill_to_drug_test_unemployed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/arkansas_pushes_forward_with_bill_to_drug_test_unemployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALEC-designed legislation is gaining traction in state houses nationwide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/proposals_to_drug_test_the_unemployed_gain_momentum/">reported last year</a> that GOP state lawmakers around the country were pushing ALEC-designed legislation that would force the unemployed to pass a drug test in order to receive benefits. According to Reuters Tuesday, such a measure is gaining ground in Arkansas. The Republican-led Arkansas state Senate approved a measure on Monday that would require random drug testing of Arkansas residents who receive state unemployment benefits. Arkansas' governor, Democrat Mike Beebe has expressed concerns about the federal legality of such a law. A similar proposal currently in a proposal under consideration in Texas' state's legislature (and supported by Gov. Rick Perry) would require drug tests for both unemployment and welfare recipients. In previous years, attempts to introduce drug tests for welfare recipients have been <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/154364/the_truth_about_drug-testing_the_unemployed?paging=off">deemed violations of the Fourth Amendment.</a> Reuters <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/09/arkansas-senate-passes-un_n_3041231.html">reported</a> on the Arkansas bill:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/arkansas_pushes_forward_with_bill_to_drug_test_unemployed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/arkansas_pushes_forward_with_bill_to_drug_test_unemployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Deal policies can save us from recession yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Works Progress Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millennials need to understand that entrepreneurship alone can't solve our long-running unemployment crisis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> The fact that the Works Progress Administration (WPA) is today remembered as an exceptional moment in American economic policy is evidence of the serious blind spots Americans have developed in the way we think about government. Even Millennials, who have experienced perhaps the worst impacts of the current recession, have often <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/startup-weekend/to-my-fellow-millennials-_b_2784663.html">celebrated entrepreneurship</a> as a solution to their employment woes, rather than calling for the robust public action that has always been a part of effective responses to economic crisis.</p><p>But making the case that addressing the jobs crisis requires much stronger public investment will have to go beyond advocating for larger stimulus packages or revived public employment programs — we must also challenge myths of economic recovery, both past and present, that render activist government invisible.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame austerity economics for our depressing new jobs report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/blame_austerity_economics_for_our_depressing_new_jobs_report_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/blame_austerity_economics_for_our_depressing_new_jobs_report_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austerity economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pace of job growth this year is even slower than it was last year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad news on the economy. It added only 88,000 jobs in March – the slowest pace of job growth in nine months.</p><p>While the jobless rate fell to 7.6 percent, much of the drop was due to the labor force shrinking by almost a half million people. If you’re not looking for work, you’re not counted as unemployed.</p><p>That means the percentage of working-age Americans either with a job or looking for one dropped to 63.3 percent — its lowest level since 1979.</p><p>The direction isn’t encouraging. The pace of job growth this year is slower than its pace last year.</p><p>What’s going on? The simple fact is companies won’t hire if consumers aren’t buying enough to justify the new hires. And consumers don’t have enough money, or credit, or confidence to buy enough.</p><p>It’s likely Americans are beginning to feel the pinches of January’s hike in the payroll tax combined with the government budget cuts known as the sequester. Increases in gas prices haven’t helped. All are taking money out of the pockets of most people – whose job situation remains precarious. So they can’t and won’t buy much.</p><p>One indicator: Retailers cut their staffs in March — by 24,100.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/blame_austerity_economics_for_our_depressing_new_jobs_report_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/blame_austerity_economics_for_our_depressing_new_jobs_report_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. economy adds 88,000 jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Labor Department says the unemployment rate dipped to 7.6 percent from 7.7 percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- U.S. employers added just 88,000 jobs in March, the fewest in nine months and a sharp retreat after a period of strong hiring. The slowdown is a reminder that the job market's path back to health will be uneven.</p><p>The Labor Department says the unemployment rate dipped to 7.6 percent from 7.7 percent. While that is the lowest in four years, the rate fell only because more people stopped looking for work.</p><p>The weakness may signal that companies were worried last month about steep government spending cuts that began on March 1.</p><p>March's job gains were half the pace of the previous six months, when the economy added an average of 196,000 jobs a month. The drop raises fears that the economy could slow after a stronger winter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can immigration reform save the American workforce?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legalizing undocumented workers would prevent employers from undercutting the country's largest unions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their agreement on is very preliminary and hasn’t yet even been blessed by the so-called Gang of Eight Senators working on immigration reform, but the mere fact that AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka and Chamber of Commerce President Thomas J. Donohue agreed on anything is remarkable.</p><p>The question is whether it’s a good deal for American workers. It is, and I’ll explain why in a moment.</p><p>Under the agreement (arrived at last weekend) a limited number of temporary visas would be issued to foreign workers in low-skilled occupations, who could thereafter petition to become American citizens.</p><p>The agreement is an important step toward a comprehensive immigration reform package to be introduced in the Senate later this month. Disagreement over allowing in low-skilled workers helped derail immigration reform in 2007.</p><p>The unions don’t want foreign workers to take jobs away from Americans or depress American wages, while business groups obviously want the lowest-priced workers they can get their hands on.</p><p>So they’ve compromised on a maximum (no more than 20,000 visas in the first year, gradually increasing to no more than 200,000 in the fifth and subsequent years), with the actual number in any year depending on labor market conditions, as determined by the government. Priority would be given to occupations where American workers were in short supply.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eurozone unemployment hits record 12 percent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/euro_zone_unemployment_hits_record_12_percent_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/euro_zone_unemployment_hits_record_12_percent_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, governments across the region are enacting tough austerity measures to get a handle on their debts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LONDON (AP) — The eurozone economy has passed another bleak milestone.</p><p>Official figures Tuesday showed that unemployment across the 17 European Union countries that use the euro has struck 12 percent for the first time since the currency was launched in 1999.</p><p>Eurostat, the EU's statistics office, said the rate in February was unchanged at the record high after January's figure was revised up to 12 percent from 11.9 percent.</p><p>Spain and Greece have mass unemployment and many other countries are seeing their numbers swell to uncomfortably high levels as governments across the region enact tough austerity measures to get a handle on their debts.</p><p>The eurozone, which is made up of a little more than 330 million people, is one of the world's major economic pillars and the turmoil surrounding it has been one of the main reasons why the global recovery has been muted.</p><p>A total of 19.07 million people were officially out of work in the eurozone in February, nearly two million more than the same month the year before. For the 27-country European Union, of which the eurozone is a large part, the unemployment rate was 10.9 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/euro_zone_unemployment_hits_record_12_percent_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/euro_zone_unemployment_hits_record_12_percent_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Let&#8217;s rebuild our infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/obama_lets_rebuild_our_infrastructure_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/obama_lets_rebuild_our_infrastructure_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13256060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While visiting a Miami port Friday, the president laid out a plan to create new jobs through public works projects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIAMI (AP) — Trying to show that the economy remains a top priority, President Barack Obama promoted a plan Friday to create construction and other jobs by attracting private money to help rebuild roads, bridges and other public works projects.</p><p>Obama fleshed out the details during a visit to a Miami port that's undergoing $2 billion in upgrades paid for with government and private dollars. The quick trip was designed to show that the economy and unemployment are top priorities for a president who also is waging high-profile campaigns on immigration reform and gun control.</p><p>Obama said the unemployment rate among construction workers was the highest of any industry, despite being cut nearly in half over the past three years.</p><p>"There are few more important things we can do to create jobs right now and strengthen our economy over the long haul than rebuilding the infrastructure that powers our businesses and economy," Obama said. "As president, my top priority is to make sure we are doing everything we can to reignite the true engine of our economic growth — and that is a rising, thriving middle class."</p><p>Among the proposals Obama called for, which require approval from Congress, are:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/obama_lets_rebuild_our_infrastructure_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/obama_lets_rebuild_our_infrastructure_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your closest Facebook friends might save you from unemployment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/your_closest_facebook_friends_are_your_best_shot_at_getting_a_job_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/your_closest_facebook_friends_are_your_best_shot_at_getting_a_job_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnegie Mellon University]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study from Carnegie Mellon finds that the social network can be a valuable headhunting tool if properly used]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailydot.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/dailydot_square-e1362890536903.png" alt="The Daily Dot" /></a> In the modern job market, social networking may be the new networking.</p><p><a href="http://thoughtcrumbs.com/publications/Burke-CSCW2013-FBandJobLoss.pdf">A recently released study</a> finds that job seekers increasingly utilize Facebook in their employment search. But the real surprise isn't that they are using the site; after all, Facebook is a ubiquitous presence in most of our lives, used for everything from <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/society/nyu-hook-ups-facebook-page/">hooking up</a> to <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/news/facebook-relationship-breakup-study/">breaking up</a>. The real surprise is the kind of online connections through which people are finding work.</p><p>The study, conducted by researchers from <a href="http://www.hcii.cmu.edu/">Carnegie-Mellon University</a> and reported on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-science/facebook-use-by-job-seekers/10151374764118859">Facebook's blog</a>, found that most people seeking work through Facebook happened upon job opportunities through friends with whom they shared stronger, rather than weaker, ties.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/your_closest_facebook_friends_are_your_best_shot_at_getting_a_job_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/your_closest_facebook_friends_are_your_best_shot_at_getting_a_job_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP confuses government and family budgets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan's newest plan focuses solely on the deficit and distracts from real economic goals, like jobs and wages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Our biggest problems over the next ten years are not deficits,” the President told House Republicans Wednesday, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/us/politics/obama-to-meet-with-house-gop-over-budget.html">according to those who attended</a> the meeting.</p><p>The President needs to deliver the same message to the public, loudly and clearly. The biggest problems we face are unemployment, stagnant wages, slow growth, and widening inequality — not deficits. The major goal must be to get jobs and wages back, not balance the budget.</p><p>Paul Ryan’s budget plan — essentially, the House Republican plan — is designed to lure the White House and Democrats, and the American public, into a debate over how to balance the federal budget in ten years, not over whether it’s worth doing.</p><p>“This is an invitation,” Ryan explained when he unveiled the plan Tuesday. “Show us how to balance the budget. If you don’t like the way we’re proposing to balance our budget, how do you propose to balance the budget?”</p><p>Until now the President has seemed all too willing to engage in that debate. His ongoing talk of a “grand bargain” to reduce the budget deficit has played directly into Republican hands.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: More moms want full-time work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean In]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poll comes amid a national debate on women in the workplace ignited by top Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Working mothers increasingly want full-time jobs, and tough economic times might be a big reason, according to a national survey.</p><p>In the Pew Research Center study being released Thursday, researchers saw a big spike in the share of working mothers who said they'd prefer to work full time; 37 percent said that was their ideal, up from 21 percent in 2007.</p><p>The poll comes amid a national debate on women in the workplace ignited by top Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg, who writes in a new book about the need for women to be more professionally aggressive.</p><p>In "Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead," Sandberg argues that women have not made true progress in the workplace over the past decade and that they need to raise their hands more and "lean in" if they want to land more senior positions in corporate America.</p><p>The shift toward full-time work in the Pew poll, however, coincides with the recession and may have less to do with career ambitions than with financial realities.</p><p>"Women aren't necessarily evolving toward some belief or comfort level with work," says study co-author Kim Parker, an associate director at the center. "They are also reacting to outside forces and in this case, it is the economy."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
