<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Unemployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/unemployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Economy added 155,000 jobs in December</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The figure met analyst expectations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- U.S. employers added 155,000 jobs in December, a steady gain that shows hiring held up during tense fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington.</p><p>The Labor Department says the unemployment rate stayed at 7.8 percent last month. November's rate was revised higher from an initially reported 7.7 percent.</p><p>Robust hiring in manufacturing and construction fueled the gains. Construction added 30,000 jobs, the most in 15 months. That likely reflects additional hiring needed to rebuild after Superstorm Sandy and also solid gains in home building that have contributed to a housing recovery.</p><p>Manufacturing gained 25,000, the most in nine months.</p><p>Even with the gains, hiring is far from accelerating. Employers added an average of 153,000 jobs a month last year, matching the monthly average in 2011.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>College debt is completely out of control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/college_debt_is_completely_out_of_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/college_debt_is_completely_out_of_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parents are increasingly taking on federal loans for their children, whose job prospects have never been bleaker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> It's been a year of eye-popping records for student debt. Outstanding student loan debt surpassed credit card debt, with one government estimate pegging total student loan debt at more than $1 trillion.</p><p>Such staggering figures drew renewed attention to the fact that rising higher education costs and falling government support for state colleges and universities has burdened individual students and their families with immense debt — all at a time when new graduates face anemic prospects for getting a decent job.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/college_debt_is_completely_out_of_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/college_debt_is_completely_out_of_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s credit system is broken</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OKCupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've carefully avoided debt my entire working life. So why am I having so much trouble getting a credit card?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> My (early) New Year’s resolution was to get a credit card. You may remember that <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/not-owning-credit-card">I have never had a credit card</a>. And thus if I were on the dating market, my OKCupid inquiries <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/business/even-cupid-wants-to-know-your-credit-score.html">would be flatly rejected</a>. It’s not that I have a bad score. I just don’t have one. I had a good score when I was dutifully paying off my student loan after I graduated, but then through paying dirt-cheap rent in Harlem and never paying for cable I was able to pay off the loan. Since then I haven’t owned any credit products. I’ve paid my rent on time every month and paid every bill before the due date. But those things don’t make their way over to FICO. I’ve thus landed myself in quite the Catch-22 that speaks volumes about the lending industry and our reliance on it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/americas_credit_system_is_broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADP report shows gain of 215,000 jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADP jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The report beat analysts expectations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. economy added 215,000 private sector jobs in December, according to the monthly report from payroll processor ADP. The gains easily beat analyst expectations for a bump of <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/december-adp-jobs-report-2013-1">140,000 jobs</a>.</p><p>The ADP report is seen as a preview of tomorrow's number from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p><p>Sectorwise, jobs in "financial activities" climbed by 14,000 and construction jobs jumped by 39,000, potentially a sign that the housing market is recovering.</p><p>On the downside, 187,000 of the new jobs were in the service sector while only 28,000 were what ADP categorizes as "goods producing." Manufacturing positions fell by 11,000. This is relevant because, in very general terms, manufacturing jobs tend to pay better than those in the service sector.</p><p>Medium-sized businesses accounted for 102,000 jobs with large companies adding 87,000 and small businesses adding 25,000.</p><p>This is a strong improvement over November's ADP report which showed an increase of 148,000 jobs revised up from 118,000.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One in eight workers will be unemployed next year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Encouraging as recent jobs reports have been, 2013 promises to be as challenging for America's work force as 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The recent unemployment statistics have been improving--<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-jobless-rate-falls-7-123110106.html">dipping below 8 percent</a>, according to the Department of Labor, for the first time in October and holding steady below that threshold ever since.</p><p>Yet, these numbers never tell the full story, and another measure of joblessness shows an unsettling trend: sporadic unemployment for millions of the nation’s workforce.</p><p>In 2011, nearly <a href="http://stateofworkingamerica.org/">15 percent of the workforce</a> was unemployed at some point throughout the year—a stark contrast to the official 2011 annual unemployment rate of 8.9 percent. The difference? The over-the-year unemployment rate takes into account the fact that many workers will be unemployed one month and then reemployed the next, while the average annual unemployment rate simply averages the amount of the labor force unemployed that very month. This means that the official annual rate obscures the unsettlingly high amount of job instability in the United States—a trend that is projected to continue into 2013.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats: Fiscal cliff deal must have jobless benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benefits could run out for millions four days after Christmas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hovering in the background of the "fiscal cliff" debate is the prospect of 2 million people losing their unemployment benefits four days after Christmas.</p><p>"This is the real cliff," said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I. He's been leading the effort to include another extension of benefits for the long-term unemployed in any deal to avert looming tax increases and massive spending cuts in January.</p><p>"Many of these people are struggling to pay mortgages, to provide education for their children," Reed said this past week as President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, rejected each other's opening offers for a deficit deal.</p><p>Emergency jobless benefits for about 2.1 million people out of work more than six months will cease Dec. 29, and 1 million more will lose them over the next three months if Congress doesn't extend the assistance again.</p><p>Since the collapse of the economy in 2008, the government has poured $520 billion - an amount equal to about half its annual deficit in recent years - into unemployment benefit extensions.</p><p>White House officials have assured Democrats that Obama is committed to extending them another year, at a cost of about $30 billion, as part of an agreement for sidestepping the fiscal cliff and reducing the size of annual increases in the federal debt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>146,000 new jobs aren&#8217;t enough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/146000_new_jobs_arent_enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/146000_new_jobs_arent_enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However encouraging, today's jobs report should remind Washington to shift its focus away from the budget deficit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s jobs report shows an economy that’s still moving in the right direction but way too slowly, which is why Washington’s continuing obsession with the federal budget deficit is insane. Jobs and growth must come first.</p><p>The cost of borrowing is so low — the yield on the ten-year Treasury is near historic lows — and the need for more jobs and better wages so high, and our infrastructure so neglected, that it’s insanity not to borrow more to put more Americans to work rebuilding the nation.</p><p>Yes, unemployment is down slightly and 146,000 new jobs were created in November. That’s some progress. But don’t be blinded by the hype coming out of Wall Street and the White House, both of which want the public to believe everything is going wonderfully well.</p><p>The fact is some 350,000 more people stopped looking for jobs in November, and the percent of the working-age population in jobs continues to drop — now at 63.6%, almost the lowest in 30 years. Meanwhile, the average workweek is stuck at 34.4 hours.</p><p>The slowness of this recovery isn’t because of Hurricane Sandy, which it turns out had very little impact on these job numbers. And it’s not because of any uncertainty over the looming “fiscal cliff.” Most consumers in November were oblivious about any pending cliff.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/146000_new_jobs_arent_enough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/146000_new_jobs_arent_enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs report: A pleasant surprise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jobs_report_a_pleasant_surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jobs_report_a_pleasant_surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that unemployment is down to 7.7 percent -- the lowest rate since 2008]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The job market in November performed notably better than expected, especially in light of expected damage to hiring from late October’s Hurricane Sandy.</p><p>The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that payrolls grew by 146,000 last month and unemployment ticked down to 7.7%, the lowest rate since late 2008.  That decline, however, was once again driven by labor force withdrawal, so it should not be taken as a sign of a tighter job market.</p><p>Analysts were expecting the impact of the storm on the most densely-packed labor markets in the country to significantly lower the job count.  But the Bureau reported that their survey response rates in the affected states were in the normal range, so they don’t believe Sandy is “substantively” distorting these numbers.</p><p>Construction data may, however, reveal some storm-related effects, with jobs off 20,000 in November after growing slightly in prior months as the housing market has begun to show signs of life (we’ll have to wait for the state data release later in the month to see if the losses were in affected states).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jobs_report_a_pleasant_surprise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jobs_report_a_pleasant_surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US adds 146,000 jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Labor Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandy threw off predictions, but a better-than-expected employment report also saw jobless rate fall]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists were way off the mark with their predictions for today's jobs report. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/08/business/economy/us-creates-146000-new-jobs-as-unemployment-rate-falls-to-7-7.html">first report </a>since President Obama's reelection saw the economy adding 146,000 jobs and the unemployment rate falling to 7.7 percent -- trumping predictions that only 86,000 jobs would be added.</p><p>Tepid forecasts were partly tied to Hurricane Sandy, which economists believed would hamper job growth -- and indeed, November's numbers were somewhat lower than in previous months' job reports. In August, September and October an average of 170,000 were added each month. Meanwhile, November's jobless rate was the lowest since December 2008, despite <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/gallup-the-unemployment-rate-surged-in-november-2012-12">Gallup predictions </a>of an unemployment surge. The pollster put unemployment in November at 8.3 percent (compared to the government's 7.7 percent).</p><p>Manufacturing jobs fell by 7,000 and as our own Andrew Leonard <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/">noted Friday,</a> despite a media frenzy, the decision by Apple to manufacture one line of Macs in the U.S., alongside other "insourcing" efforts by U.S. corporations, does not mark a glorious  renaissance in U.S. manufacturing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Sandy affect tomorrow&#8217;s jobs report?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/will_sandy_affect_tomorrows_jobs_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/will_sandy_affect_tomorrows_jobs_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moody's predicts that the superstorm may have led to 86,000 fewer jobs in November]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Friday is jobs day and the November numbers–payroll gains, the unemployment rate–will provide one of the first looks at the negative impact of late October’s hurricane Sandy on a major indicator.</p><p>Today’s <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-05/adp-says-u-s-companies-added-118-000-workers-in-november.html">ADP report</a> provides a preliminary glance.  The payroll firm reported 118,000 jobs created in the private sector last month, down from 158,000 in October.</p><p>Moody’s.com guesstimated that Sandy led to 86,000 fewer jobs in November.  Since the ADP reports job gains by firm size, one indicator of Sandy’s impact can be seen in the sharper deceleration last month of job growth at smaller firms, which are more likely to be shut down by the storm than larger firms.</p><p>The BLS payroll survey–the official employment metric out Friday–asks employers to report their payrolls as of the middle of the month.   The fact that many businesses were closed due to the damage from the storm is expected to lower jobs numbers for November and possibly later months as well.  From the Bureau:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/will_sandy_affect_tomorrows_jobs_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/will_sandy_affect_tomorrows_jobs_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 ways to improve America&#8217;s labor market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/4_ways_to_improve_americas_labor_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/4_ways_to_improve_americas_labor_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1 percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 30-year backlog of policies has created staggering income inequality. Here's how we can address them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> Now that the election is over, our hope is that we can finally move beyond the vacuous invocations of an imaginary middle class where everyone is in the same boat. It’s time to get real about the concrete policies needed to take on the multiple inequalities that run deep through the U.S. labor market. And we’re not talking about the “skills mismatch,” another red herring routinely flung into this debate by both sides (including by President Obama as recently as the <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/170950/talkpoverty-obama-campaign-responds">last week</a> of the campaign).</p><p>What we’re talking about is a broad, multi-year agenda to give America’s workers a living wage and voice on the job and to take on the continuing exclusion of workers of color, immigrants, and women from good jobs. The media may have discovered inequality last year with the surprise emergence of Occupy Wall Street, but in truth, there is a 30-year backlog of policies to fix the extreme maldistribution of wages and opportunity in the labor market.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/4_ways_to_improve_americas_labor_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/4_ways_to_improve_americas_labor_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop obsessing over the budget deficit!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/stop_obsessing_over_the_budget_deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/stop_obsessing_over_the_budget_deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can't dimiss the "fiscal cliff" outright, but the truth is it's not even our most pressing economic issue]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish President Obama and the Democrats would explain to the nation that the federal budget deficit isn’t the nation’s major economic problem and deficit reduction shouldn’t be our major goal. Our problem is lack of good jobs and sufficient growth, and our goal must be to revive both.</p><p>Deficit reduction leads us in the opposite direction — away from jobs and growth. The reason the “fiscal cliff” is dangerous (and, yes, I know – it’s not really a “cliff” but more like a hill) is because it’s too much deficit reduction, too quickly. It would suck too much demand out of the economy.</p><p>But more jobs and growth will help reduce the deficit. With more jobs and faster growth, the deficit will shrink as a proportion of the overall economy. Recall the 1990s when the Clinton administration balanced the budget ahead of the schedule it had set with Congress because of faster job growth than anyone expected — bringing in more tax revenues than anyone had forecast. Europe offers the same lesson in reverse: Their deficits are ballooning because their austerity policies have caused their economies to sink.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/stop_obsessing_over_the_budget_deficit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/stop_obsessing_over_the_budget_deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s biggest challenge: Job creation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/obamas_biggest_challenge_job_creation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/obamas_biggest_challenge_job_creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Deal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget all the hand-wringing about the fiscal cliff. The president needs to set his sights on unemployment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a>  The presidential victory of Barack Obama was an important vindication for the uses of government. The small-government ideologues were defeated, but now the nation must go farther and recognize government is indeed a job creator.</p><p>Let’s begin with the harsh facts: Neither policymakers nor the media fully understand or communicate that America has a jobs emergency. In his victory speech last Tuesday, President Obama did not even cite job creation as one of his four main goals for the new term. Not only is unemployment high, but wages are stagnant and poverty is rising in an economic recovery. The evidence on the creation of low-wage jobs rather than high-wage jobs is almost frightening; the Roosevelt Institute’s own <a href="http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/people/annette-bernhardt" target="_blank">Annette Bernhardt</a> has been <a href="http://www.nelp.org/index.php/content/content_about_us/tracking_the_recovery_after_the_great_recession" target="_blank">a leader on this</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/obamas_biggest_challenge_job_creation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/obamas_biggest_challenge_job_creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2.5 million jobless adults living with their parents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moody's Analytics data shows a vast rise in "bundled households" since 2007]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the New York Times' Economix blog <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/bundled-households/">reported</a> Monday, despite signs of an improving economy, "the bundled-household phenomenon remains large." That is, a large number of adult children have moved back into their parents' house, unable to support independent households. The Times revealed new data from Moody's Analytics:</p><blockquote><p>There are about 17.2 million adult children living in their parents’ homes this year, compared with around 15.3 million in 2007, the year the recession began ... And the numbers show that the greatest increases are accounted for by unemployed adult children who have moved in with parents. In 2007, 1.3 million unemployed adult children were living in their parents’ homes. This year, the total is about 2.5 million.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exit poll: Many still blame Bush for bad economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13064675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joblessness and high prices are among top voter worries]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Rising prices and chronic unemployment were heavy on the minds of voters Tuesday even as a glimmer of optimism peeked through. Four in 10 said the nation's battered economy is getting better.</p><p>Most everyone agreed there's still far to go. They were less likely to blame President Barack Obama for the economic troubles, however, than to point the finger at his predecessor, George W. Bush, according to preliminary results of a national exit poll.</p><p>Only a fourth thought they were better off financially than four years ago when Obama was elected in the midst of the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression. Voters were most likely to say their families were doing about the same, and Obama led among that group.</p><p>A third felt worse off, and they were voting heavily for Romney.</p><p>The survey of voters as they left polling places showed 6 in 10 ranked the economy the top issue, way ahead of health care, the federal budget deficit or foreign policy. The majority who don't yet see economic improvement were roughly divided over whether things were getting even worse or just stuck in place.</p><p>About 4 in 10 blamed Obama for the nation's economic woes, and almost all of them voted for Republican challenger Mitt Romney.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs report: Things are looking up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/jobs_report_things_are_looking_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/jobs_report_things_are_looking_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13061136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The economy might not be roaring back, but today's numbers are just further evidence that we're on the right track]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the big jobs report is out showing payrolls grew by a more-than-expected 171,000 last month and the unemployment rate ticked up slightly, as expected, to 7.9%. Job growth for the prior two months was revised up by 84,000, and the average monthly pace of job growth over the past four months -- a useful way of smoothing out monthly noise in the data -- is 173,000, a sharp acceleration over the second quarter’s pace of 67,000 per month.</p><p>The uptick in unemployment was expected after September’s 0.3 percentage point drop, but a few things are worth noting. First, the 0.1 point increase is statistically indistinguishable from no change at all -- the unemployment rate has to rise or fall about 0.2 points to be significant. At 7.9%, the jobless rate is down significantly -- by one full point -- from its rate one year ago. Second, one reason for the slight uptick was that more people came into the labor market seeking work. We’ll need to see how this development evolves in coming months, but we may be seeing early signs of an improving job market pulling more job seekers in from the sidelines.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/jobs_report_things_are_looking_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/jobs_report_things_are_looking_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget jobs, what about wages?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/forget_jobs_what_about_wages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/forget_jobs_what_about_wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest jobs report offers signs of encouragement, but the economy won't improve until salaries start climbing ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two most important trends, confirmed in today’s jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, are that (1) jobs slowly continue to return, and (2) those jobs are paying less and less.</p><p>Today’s report showed 171,000 workers were added to payrolls in October, up from 148,000 in September. At the same time, unemployment rose to 7.9 percent from 7.8 percent last month. The reason for the seeming disparity: As jobs have begun to return, more people have been entering the labor force seeking employment. The household survey, on which the unemployment percentage is based, counts as “unemployed” only people who are looking for work.</p><p>As I’ve said, you have to take a single month’s report with a grain of salt because the job reports bounce around a great deal and are often revised. Last month the BLS announced that 114,000 new jobs were created in September. Today the BLS revised that September figure upward to 148,000.</p><p>Overall, the jobs trend is in the right direction. The president and Democrats can take some comfort.</p><p>The most disturbing aspect of today’s report is the continuing decline of wages. Average hourly earnings climbed 1.6 percent in October from the same time last year. That’s not enough to match the rate of inflation – meaning that hourly earnings continue to drop in real terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/forget_jobs_what_about_wages/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/forget_jobs_what_about_wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans are going back to work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Romney will have to look elsewhere for a last minute campaign boost. The economy added 171,000 jobs in October]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's all smiles in Chicago, and frowny faces in Boston.</p><p>If Mitt Romney was holding out hope that one last downbeat unemployment report would give his campaign some juice heading into the final weekend of the 2012 campaign, he is sure to be disappointed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm ">reported on Friday morning</a> that the economy added 171,000 jobs in October, almost 50,000 more than had been expected by economists. The unemployment ticked up one meaningless notch, from 7.8 to 7.9 percent.</p><p>Indeed, this is a case where the rise in the unemployment rate is actually an encouraging sign. Total employment in the U.S., according to the BLS's household survey, rose by a very healthy 410,000, but the overall civilian labor force -- defined as the set of all Americans who have jobs or <em>are looking for jobs</em> -- surged by 578,000. The labor force participation rate, accordingly, rose to 63.8 percent. What that means is that Americans who had previously given up on the labor market are now actively looking for jobs again. The unemployment rate rose, paradoxically, because the job market is more encouraging.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take tomorrow&#8217;s jobs report with a grain of salt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/take_tomorrows_jobs_report_with_a_grain_of_salt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/take_tomorrows_jobs_report_with_a_grain_of_salt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever the candidates may say, a single month's numbers aren't a reliable gauge of the economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three times today I’ve been asked on media outlets about the likely effect on the presidential election of Friday’s jobs report, depending on what the Bureau of Labor Statistics announces.</p><p>Unfortunately, the BLS report is likely to sway some voters — and therefore have an impact on this tight race. But it shouldn’t.</p><p>The report surely will be used by one of the candidates to make a sweeping case for himself and against his opponent. An unemployment rate above last month’s 7.8 percent, or a number of new jobs below September’s 114,000, will be wielded by Mitt Romney as evidence the economy is slowing – while a rate below last month’s, and a number above it, will be used by Team Obama as evidence the economy is moving in the right direction.</p><p>In truth, no one should base their vote on tomorrow’s labor report because a single month’s report isn’t a reliable gauge of which way the economy is heading. A report that the unemployment rate is 7.8 percent, for example, means only that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is 90 percent sure the real rate lies between 7.6 percent and 8.0 percent. By the same token, an announcement that the economy created 100,000 jobs in October means the BLS is 90 percent sure the number of new jobs is between 90,000 and 110,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/take_tomorrows_jobs_report_with_a_grain_of_salt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/take_tomorrows_jobs_report_with_a_grain_of_salt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four years ago, the economy really sucked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobless claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did things look the week before Americans voted in 2008? Really, really bad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thursday was a big day for economic indicators, with new numbers on jobless claims, private sector job creation, automobile sales and manufacturing sector growth. Together, the reports deliver the last big dump of data before next Tuesday's election.</p><p>So let's have some fun with that old chestnut: Are you better off now than you were four years ago?</p><p><strong>Auto sales</strong></p><p>Four years ago, the automobile market <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/03/news/companies/auto_sales/index.htm ">collapsed to its lowest point in 25 years.</a> Sales in October 2008 declined by 32 percent over a year earlier, projecting to an annual rate of 10.6 million.</p><p>October 2012's sales won't be quite as robust as September's, mostly due to a big hit at the end of the month from Hurricane Sandy, but all the major car companies except Nissan registered year-on-year growth, and the annual rate is <a href=" http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/11/us-light-vehicle-sales-at-143-million.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CalculatedRisk+%28Calculated+Risk%29">projected to 14.3 million.</a></p><p><strong>Jobless claims</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>