<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Unions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/unions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Longshoremen strike averted, for now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/longshoremen_strike_averted_for_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/longshoremen_strike_averted_for_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longshoremen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf of Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Coast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The union extended its contract for 30 days, avoiding a strike that would cripple East Coast ports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) - The union for longshoremen along the East Coast and Gulf of Mexico has agreed to extend its contract for 30 days, averting a possible strike that could have crippled operations at ports that handle about 40 percent of all U.S. container cargo, a federal mediator announced Friday.</p><p>The extension came after the union and an alliance of port operators and shipping lines resolved one of the stickier points in their months-long contract negotiations, involving royalty payments made to union members for each container they unload.</p><p>Negotiations will continue until at least midnight on Jan. 28. Some important contract issues remain to be resolved, but the head of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, George Cohen, said the agreement on royalties was "a major positive step forward."</p><p>"While some significant issues remain in contention, I am cautiously optimistic that they can be resolved in the upcoming 30-day extension period," he said.</p><p>The terms of the royalty agreement were not announced.</p><p>The master contract between the International Longshoremen's Association and the U.S. Maritime Alliance, a group representing shipping lines, terminal operators and port associations, originally expired in September. The two sides agreed to extend it once before, for 90 days, but it had been set to expire again on 12:01 a.m. Sunday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/longshoremen_strike_averted_for_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/longshoremen_strike_averted_for_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions and conservatives eye the next labor battleground</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union busting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether right-to-work legislation is pushed next in Ohio or elsewhere, the battle will be fierce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The passing in Michigan of right-to-work legislation delivered a severe blow this week to the labor movement. Now as union activists and their supporters strategize on how to push back against the national, Koch-backed onslaught against labor rights, right-to-work advocates seek their next battleground.</p><p>According to a<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/labors-plan-to-fight-back-84948_Page3.html"> report by </a>Alexander Burns and Maggie Haberman at Politico, the union counteroffensive is setting its sights on fighting conservative state leaders in next year's gubernatorial elections, particularly in the Midwest. Via Politico:</p><blockquote><p>The AFL-CIO has already built up sizable campaign operations in Pennsylvania, Florida, Nevada and Wisconsin – the site of a titanic 2012 gubernatorial recall fight – in addition to Ohio and Michigan, union officials said. The labor giant deployed new staff to those states about a year ago as part of what AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka has called the “permanent infrastructure” of national unions.</p> <p>... Labor leaders have vowed to make Snyder regret signing the “right to work” law he approved this week. Beyond Michigan, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett have appeared vulnerable in polling.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan unions won&#8217;t lie down</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/michigan_unions_wont_lie_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/michigan_unions_wont_lie_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right-to-work bill may now be law, but organizers are already planning their next move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> In Michigan, the birthplace of the labor movement, this week’s abrupt passage of a “right-to-work” law incited the largest protest in Lansing’s history: at least 12,500 people, wearing red, chanting, singing, drumming, committing civil disobedience, and otherwise battling to be heard as lawmakers in a lame-duck session overhauled the state’s labor laws without public input or committee meetings. State house Democrats’ attempts to pass amendments that would, for example, put right-to-work up for a public vote or eliminate the $1 million appropriation seemingly designed so that the law withstands the threat of voter referendum, all failed. That $1 million appropriation is supposed to go toward educating workers and union about life under right-to-work, and, in the budget-strained state, it’s not clear what the source of the money will be.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/michigan_unions_wont_lie_down/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/michigan_unions_wont_lie_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News contributor punched during right-to-work protests</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fox_new_contributor_punched_during_right_to_work_protests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fox_new_contributor_punched_during_right_to_work_protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Crowder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven Crowder got into a scuffle with some union protesters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the right was all over this video of Fox News contributor Steven Crowder getting punched by union protesters in Michigan, over the state's right-to-work law.</p><p>The video is edited so it's tough to nail down the sequence of events specifically, but Crowder appears to have gotten punched while trying to stop protesters from tearing down an Americans for Prosperity tent.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/u_F3oev06i0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>The right pounced on Twitter:</p><p>[embedtweet id="278701492838477824"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="278616787292147712"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="278603262586929152"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="278597653078630400"]</p><p>On Sean Hannity's show, Crowder <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/steven-crowder-opens-up-to-hannity-about-brawl-with-union-protestors-if-i-had-defended-myself-they-would-have-killed-me-where-i-stood/">said</a>: “I literally believe, Sean, that if I had defended myself at all, even flicked a small little jab, that they would have killed me where I stood."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fox_new_contributor_punched_during_right_to_work_protests/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/fox_new_contributor_punched_during_right_to_work_protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan&#8217;s right-to-work bill cribs ALEC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill passed today takes language verbatim from ALEC's model legislation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican-backed <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/">right-to-work bill</a> given final approval Tuesday in Michigan contains language cribbed verbatim from a model anti-union bill created by ALEC, according to a watchdog group.</p><p>The American Legislative Exchange Council, of course, is the corporate-backed, conservative-leaning organization that has become a bugaboo for liberals by pushing legislation to do everything from roll back environmental regulation to weaken gun control laws, as brought to the fore this year by the murder of Trayvon Martin. ALEC, like lots of groups that work in state capitols, creates “model legislation” that friendly lawmakers can introduce in whole or as a basis for their own bills.</p><p>Both Michigan’s <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/billengrossed/House/htm/2011-HEBS-4003.htm">HB 4003</a>, which affects public sector unions, and <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/billengrossed/House/htm/2011-HEBH-4054.htm">HB 4054</a>, which affects private sector unions, appears to pull language directly from <a href="http://alecexposed.org/w/images/c/c8/1R10-Right_to_Work_Act_Exposed.pdf">ALEC’s model right-to-work bill</a>. The Center for Media and Democracy, a liberal watchdog group which has been working for years to expose ALEC’s activities, created <a href="http://www.prwatch.org/files/Michigan_HB_4003_(public_sector)_side_by_side.pdf">these</a> <a href="http://www.prwatch.org/files/Michigan_HB_4054_side-by-side.pdf">chart</a> comparing the language:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: &#8220;Violent Union Thugs 1st&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_violent_union_thugs_1st/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_violent_union_thugs_1st/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dumb tweet of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's surprising that we're fighting union workers and not "radical Islam," says one Twitter user]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="278610470762586113"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_violent_union_thugs_1st/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_violent_union_thugs_1st/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-to-work doesn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lansing MI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan passes an anti-union law and claims it's good for workers. Economists say sure -- if you own the company]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan lawmakers gave <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/">final approval today</a> to a so-called right-to-work law, which bans unions from charging mandatory dues, arguing that it will be a boon for the state’s economy. “This is to move Michigan forward. It’s about more and better jobs, and it’s about worker choice,” Republican Gov. Rick Snyder told MSNBC this afternoon.</p><p>Right-to-work laws are already in place in 22 states, so do they actually create more and better jobs? We asked some experts to find out and the answer is, well, complicated.</p><p>Lonnie Stevans, a professor at Hofstra University who used quantitative models to <a href="http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rle.2009.5.1/rle.2009.5.1.1352/rle.2009.5.1.1352.xml?format=INT">study the issue</a>, is not bullish on the laws. “Although right-to-work states may be more attractive to business, this would not necessarily translate into enhanced economic verve in the right-to-work state if there is little ‘trickle-down’ from business owners to the non-unionized workers," he told Salon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands to rally against Michigan right-to-work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union busting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: The Republican-majority House passes both union-busting bills and Gov. Snyder defends his support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE 2.30 p.m. (EST):</strong> Gov. Rick Snyder spoke to MSNBC following the House votes and reiterated his vow to sigh right-to-work bills into law. Host Andrea Mitchell pushed the Republican governor on the fact that right-to-work had not been a campaign issue. He responded that his decision to back the union-busting legislation followed a failed attempt by labor leaders in the state to extend collective bargaining rights through a bill called Proposal 2. Snyder told Mitchell:</p><blockquote><p>Well, the voters spoke in November and dramatically voted down Proposal 2, but then this right to work discussion just continued to escalate and was becoming very divisive. So the way I viewed it is, it's on the table. It's a hot issue. Let's show some leadership. So I stepped up to say when I review it, I think it's a good thing. It's about being pro-worker. It’s about giving freedom of choice to workers.</p></blockquote><p>Watch a clip of the interview via MSNBC below.</p><p><strong>UPDATE 1.50 p.m. (EST):</strong> The Michigan House has approved both right-to-work bills, pertaining to both public and private sector workers, and the legislation will now be sent to Gov. Rick Snyder, who vowed he would sing the bills into law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor rights in Michigan blindsided by GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union busting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday night, GOP lawmakers backed by Koch brothers voted through a Right-to-Work bill announced that morning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night Republican legislators backed by the Koch brothers delivered a harsh blow to the union heartland of Michigan. Right-to-work legislation was pushed through both the state House and Senate by Republican majorities, while powerless and furious protesters looked on.</p><p>It was a sneak move -- GOP lawmakers only announced Thursday morning that they intended to enact the so-called right-to-work bill (aptly described by its opponents as the "no-rights-at-work" bill). Right-to-work laws ban requirements to pay dues or fees to a union as a condition of employment --  studies have consistently shown that states with right-to-work laws have lower wages for union and non-union workers.</p><p>As a study by <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/12/06/wall-street-journal-pushes-myths-about-wage-low/191720">Elise Gould and Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute found</a>:</p><blockquote><p>[O]ur findings -- that "right-to-work" laws are associated with significantly lower wages and reduced chances of receiving employer-sponsored health insurance and pensions -- are based on the most rigorous statistical analysis currently possible. These findings should discourage right-to-work policy initiatives. The fact is, while RTW legislation misleadingly sounds like a positive change in this weak economy, in reality the opportunity it gives workers is only that to work for lower wages and fewer benefits.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing the Apple jobs back home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reverse globalization is suddenly in the headlines. Here's why American workers shouldn't be jumping for joy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Cook may not be Steve Jobs, but the new Apple CEO proved this week that he is just as good as the old Apple CEO at getting the media to snap to attention. One carefully calibrated bomb dropped toward the end of a humongous Bloomberg BusinessWeek interview -- that <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-12-06/tim-cooks-freshman-year-the-apple-ceo-speaks#p9">Apple plans to spend $100 million</a> to bring some Mac manufacturing back to the United States in 2013 -- rocketed around the world, from Twitter to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/technology/apple-to-resume-us-manufacturing.html?hp ">New York Times,</a> in less time than it takes to run down the battery on your iPhone. Who needs Steve Jobs? Real <em>jobs</em> are coming back to America!</p><p>The timing was perfect for a growing cohort of economy-watchers eager to make the argument that globalization's malign impact on the American worker has hit high tide and is finally beginning to ebb. Just a week ago, the Atlantic presciently published <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/12/the-insourcing-boom/309166/">"The Insourcing Boom,"</a> a fascinating in-depth story by Charles Fishman investigating General Electric's decision to start up new appliance assembly lines in the U.S. And "GE is not alone," writes Fishman,  arguing that an increasing number of American corporations are discovering it makes economic sense to bring the factories back home. Apple's news was the exclamation point at the end of the Atlantic's sentence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LA, Long Beach Ports strike ends</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILWU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles and Long Beach Ports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The strike, which crippled America's largest shipping hub, aimed to end outsourcing of union jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clerical workers at the twin ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach will return to work Wednesday after an eight day strike which crippled America's largest shipping port. Federal mediators from Washington were called in earlier this week to aid negotiations between striking International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 63 members and terminal operators. The deal, details of which are not yet public, awaits ratification by the union.</p><p>As the Los Angeles Times <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-1205-ports-talks-20121205,0,7425017.story">reported</a>:</p><blockquote><p>It ends a grueling battle between both sides that threatened to damage the fragile U.S. economy. Since the strike began, 20 ships diverted to rival ports in Oakland, Ensenada and Panama, while other freighters docked offshore waiting for a resolution... The strike began Nov. 27 as the clerical workers' union voiced frustration about shipping line employers outsourcing jobs, an accusation the Harbor Employers Assn. has denied.</p> <p>Though the union is small, it was backed by the 10,000 regional members of the ILWU, which honored the picket line and refused to work. By the end, the strike shut down 10 of the 14 cargo container terminals at the nation's busiest seaport complex.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast-food striker fired &#8212; but not for long</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Wendy's worker is fired -- then reinstated -- and the surprise strike by NYC workers sparks little backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friday, 200-some New York City fast food workers returned to work after pulling off an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/" target="_blank">unprecedented strike</a> against one of the country’s largest and lowest-paying industries. They didn’t return alone – the strikers were escorted back into their stores by squads of supporters designed to discourage managers from retaliating. And organizers say the fast food companies so far haven’t tried to punish strikers, with one dramatic exception: A Wendy’s store that told a woman she was fired, then backed down after the store was occupied and picketed by activists, community leaders, and a member of the City Council.</p><p>According to Councilmember Jumanne Williams, 10 out of 11 strikers were allowed to resume work when they arrived at Brooklyn’s 425 Fulton Street Wendy’s, but management told the eleventh that she was being fired for absenteeism. Williams said that workers provided management with written notice that they were striking Thursday, but a manager claimed not to have received it. “We tried to speak with the general manager that was there, and he wasn’t forthcoming in talking to me,” said Williams. “So I decided to ask all of the customers that were there if they would leave in support of the worker that was fired. That did happen – they left. We began to protest in the store.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>200 take part in largest strike in fast food history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/200_take_part_in_largest_strike_in_fast_food_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/200_take_part_in_largest_strike_in_fast_food_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York workers from a dozen Wendy's, McDonald's and Burger King stores walk out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Josh Eidelson <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/">reported</a> on Salon early Thursday, "New York City fast food workers walked off the job, launching a rare strike against a nearly union-free industry."</p><p>Reports from organizers rallying in Times Square in support of the strike suggest that as many as 200 workers walked out Thursday to demand fair wages. The Huffington Post<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/29/fast-food-strikes-nyc_n_2213548.html"> noted </a>that employees, the majority from McDonald's around the city, continued to walk off the job throughout the day, making official strike numbers difficult to confirm. "At a McDonald’s on Madison Avenue at 6:30 am, 16 workers picketed. According to Raymond Lopez, one of the 16, that was almost half of the store’s total workforce of 40 people," HuffPo noted.</p><p>Radio Dispatch host John Knefel and writer Jesse Myerson, both reporting from the Times Square rally, posted the comments and chants of some one-day strikers on Twitter:</p><p>[embedtweet id="274270316430237698"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[embedtweet id="274269219447791618"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[embedtweet id="274266014504603650"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/200_take_part_in_largest_strike_in_fast_food_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/200_take_part_in_largest_strike_in_fast_food_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart&#8217;s not the only one responsible for the Bangladesh fires</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Science Monitor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparel factories have grown impossibly hostile to organized labor -- and major retailers are turning a blind eye]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> A day after Walmart workers and their allies staged <a href="http://www.alternet.org/labor/walmart-walkouts-are-just-start">protests and rallies</a> outside the company’s stores across the U.S., a fire erupted in a factory across the globe in Bangladesh, killing 112 workers who were trapped inside, where they sewed jeans and other apparel for the retail giant’s Faded Glory brand. Another 200 were injured in the fire. On Monday, the streets of Dhaka, the capital city, were <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/27/world/asia/garment-workers-stage-protest-in-bangladesh-after-deadly-fire.html">filled with thousands</a> of garment workers, who demanded justice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twinkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart examines the death of the American Twinkie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"What could have destroyed this beloved American diabetes dispensary?" asks Jon Stewart, regarding the shuttering of Twinkie maker Hostess. Was it the unions? American moms? CEOs? Newt Gingrich? Jon Stewart takes a hard look at the death of the Twinkie and how America's future generations will "get by" without it.</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 410px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:421545" frameborder="0" width="400" height="228"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-november-27-2012/the-employees-strike-back---twinkie-s-end">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t shop at Wal-Mart on Friday!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/dont_shop_at_wal_mart_on_friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/dont_shop_at_wal_mart_on_friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unionization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Auto Workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you care a lick about America's work force, help push its largest employer to improve its employees' wages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A half century ago America’s largest private-sector employer was General Motors, whose full-time workers earned an average hourly wage of around $50, in today’s dollars, including health and pension benefits.</p><p>Today, America’s largest employer is Walmart, whose average employee earns $8.81 an hour. A third of Walmart’s employees work less than 28 hours per week and don’t qualify for benefits.</p><p>There are many reasons for the difference – including globalization and technological changes that have shrunk employment in American manufacturing while enlarging it in sectors involving personal services, such as retail.</p><p>But one reason, closely related to this seismic shift, is the decline of labor unions in the United States. In the 1950s, over a third of private-sector workers belonged to a union. Today fewer than 7 percent do. As a result, the typical American worker no longer has the bargaining clout to get a sizeable share of corporate profits.</p><p>At the peak of its power and influence in the 1950s, the United Auto Workers could claim a significant portion of GM’s earnings for its members.</p><p>Walmart’s employees, by contrast, have no union to represent them. So they’ve had no means of getting much of the corporation’s earnings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/dont_shop_at_wal_mart_on_friday/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/dont_shop_at_wal_mart_on_friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart&#8217;s Black Friday showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUR walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Labor Relations Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything you need to know about the historic strikes and the attempts to shut them down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employees at 1,000 Walmart stores across the country are planning to strike on Black Friday. The holiday period industrial action comes in the wake of a string of strikes by Walmart workers in several states and involving employees throughout the retailer's supply chain. As<a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/171222/alleging-new-wave-retaliation-walmart-warehouse-workers-will-strike-day-early#"> Josh Eidelson noted </a>at the Nation, "seafood workers [went on strike] in June, [followed] by warehouse workers in September, and by 160 retail workers in twelve states last month."</p><p>"Black Friday," wrote Eidelson, "workers have pledged -- barring concessions from the company -- will bring their biggest disruptions yet." Walmart employees across the country have a host of grievances including unsafe and unsanitary working conditions, sexual harassment, excessive hours, <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/14/walmart-unable-to-substantiate-forced-labor-claims-at-seafood-supplier.html">forced labor</a> and low pay. <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/19/leaked-document-reveals-walmarts-meager-compensation-structure/">Ned Resnikoff at MSNBC flagged</a> a leaked internal document (first obtained by HuffPo) that revealed that base pay  at Walmart's Sam's Place stores can be as low as $8 an hour (or $16,000 per year), with wage increases in increments as low as 20 or 40 cents per hour. To put this in context, <a href="http://gawker.com/5962195/where-to-find-your-wal+mart-black-friday-protests">Gawker</a> recently highlighted <a href="http://www.demos.org/publication/retails-hidden-potential-how-raising-wages-would-benefit-workers-industry-and-overall-ec">a Demos study</a> that says that raising the salary of all full-time workers at large retailers to $25,000 per year would lift more than 700,000 people out of poverty, at a cost of only a 1 percent price increase for customers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/walmarts_black_friday_showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions flexed muscles in state campaigns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor pushed to elect Democratic governors and defeat anti-union ballot initiatives ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — From California to Maine, unions used their political muscle in the recent elections to help install Democratic governors, build labor-friendly majorities in state legislatures and defeat ballot initiatives against them.</p><p>The combination of union money and member mobilization helped Democrats take control of state legislatures in Maine and Minnesota.</p><p>In Michigan, voters repealed a law that allowed cities in financial distress to suspend collective bargaining contracts. But unions lost there on an effort to make collective bargaining rights a part of the state constitution.</p><p>In New Hampshire, unions helped Maggie Hassan win the governor's race. Unions spent millions backing Hassan with television ads and an extensive get-out-the-vote operation because she opposes a right-to-work bill to ban labor-management contracts that require affected workers to be union members or pay union fees.</p><p>In perhaps their most important victory, unions defeated a California ballot measure that would have prohibited them from collecting money for political purposes through payroll deductions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The nonsense of UnionMade clothing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/the_nonsense_of_unionmade_clothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/the_nonsense_of_unionmade_clothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UnionMade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Lemon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flogging clothing not made by unions under a misleading title relies on Liz Lemon-like customers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In San Francisco, there's an expensive men's clothing store called UnionMade, which, <a href="http://gawker.com/5961169/unionmade-retailer-of-expensive-fashions-that-are-not-union-made">Gawker reported</a> Friday, sells apparel that is not union made. When one labor rights-concerned customer inquired about the union behind the garments, the store responded with a nonsense aphorism, explaining that most UnionMade items were actually not made by unionized workers:</p><p>"The name UNIONMADE is an overarching concept and narrative for the store, signifying that we strive to carry well made and aesthetically timeless goods."</p><p>It's the latest example of faux-workerism -- akin to Levi's "<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;cad=rja&amp;ved=0CFYQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.levistrauss.com%2Fnews%2Fpress-releases%2Flevis-proclaims-we-are-all-workers-launch-latest-go-forth-marketing-campaign&amp;ei=hYumUPPqHvGX0gHEr4HoDw&amp;usg=AFQjCNEiVCtabpAU1vSyhMWP5ZVvUi9PAg">We are all workers</a>" campaign -- (UnionMade's logo even copies the AFL-CIO's) while unions remain under threat and retrenched in the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/the_nonsense_of_unionmade_clothing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/the_nonsense_of_unionmade_clothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;ve never been more hopeful&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liveblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic Novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[108 year old first voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Rolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo-calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liveblog: The president eloquently accepts a second term of office -- and vows to build on the progress we've made]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you seeing and hearing in your state and at the polling place? Send information and photos to readermail@salon.com.</p><p>[liveblog id=38]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>