<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > United Nations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/united_nations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>El Salvador court delays ruling on abortion case while woman&#8217;s life hangs in the balance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/el_salvador_court_delays_ruling_on_abortion_case_while_womans_life_hangs_in_the_balance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/el_salvador_court_delays_ruling_on_abortion_case_while_womans_life_hangs_in_the_balance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el salvador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beatriz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's a tragedy. She is desperate as she nears her 25th week of pregnancy," said lawyer Angelica Rivas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After more than a month of delays, El Salvador's Supreme Court has announced that it will decide whether or not a critically ill woman may receive a lifesaving abortion within the next two weeks. The 22-year-old woman, identified only as Beatriz, pleaded with the justices to spare her life last week, telling the court: "This baby inside me cannot survive. I am ill. I want to live."</p><p>"It's a tragedy. She is desperate as she nears her 25th week of pregnancy," Beatriz's lawyer Angelica Rivas <a href="http://www.trust.org/item/20130522170416-ur0a2/?source%20=%20hpbreaking" target="_blank">told</a> the Thomson Reuters Foundation on Wednesday. "She trusts her doctors who say she needs to have an abortion."</p><p>Beatriz's doctors are not the only ones who have advocated for the lifesaving procedure. As Salon has previously <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/el_salvador_woman_pleads_with_court_to_grant_life_saving_abortion/" target="_blank">reported</a>, the young woman, who has been hospitalized for weeks due to life-threatening complications related to her lupus, hypertension and kidney function and whose anencephalic fetus has been pronounced nonviable by her doctors, has the <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-b2SbTi4ZuX0/UW8gSaN8PNI/AAAAAAAAHFc/fqqE__GtgBs/s1600/525308_514642638571101_90393927_n.jpg" target="_blank">support</a> of El Salvador's Ministry of Health and President Mauricio Funes. In a statement last week, Funes said that Beatriz, who is already a mother to a young son, should be able to decide her own fate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/el_salvador_court_delays_ruling_on_abortion_case_while_womans_life_hangs_in_the_balance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/el_salvador_court_delays_ruling_on_abortion_case_while_womans_life_hangs_in_the_balance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota GOPer: Climate change is a &#8220;United Nations fraud&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Gruenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He added that those who believe in man-made global warming "believe that exhaling causes global warming"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen, R-Minn., doesn't want the rest of the state legislature to worry about the prospect of man-made climate change, because "it's just a complete United Nations fraud and lie, OK?"</p><p>Gruenhagen was speaking on the House floor, and cited "facts from CPAC" showing that "in the last 16 years, there's been no global warming." He continued: "So members, I'd recommend that you keep breathing, OK? Because, you know, man-made global warming believes that exhaling causes global warming. I mean, the more you study it the more utter nonsense you see it is."</p><p>Watch, via <a href="https://twitter.com/theuptake/status/335014218237616130">The Uptake</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gDkGfO0BopE" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><em>Correction: </em>An earlier version of this post incorrectly attributed the video to the Minnesota City Pages.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 bizarre conspiracy theories that the GOP takes seriously</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/seven_bizarre_conspiracy_theories_that_the_gop_takes_seriously_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/seven_bizarre_conspiracy_theories_that_the_gop_takes_seriously_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agenda 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fear peddlers want elected representatives to initiate investigations and draft bills to address fake threats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>Once upon a time, the most outlandish fantasies of fringe political fabulists were confined to a narrow spectrum on the AM radio dial. They concocted delusional narratives that ranged from murderous first ladies to galactic alliances with Martians. It was an entertaining world of fiction and a guilty pleasure for some, even as the true believers were convinced of the frightening fate that was unfolding.</p><p>Today, however, the boundaries between rational political discourse and raving madness have been erased. The extremist peddlers of nightmare scenarios who were once thought to be charmingly eccentric at 1am are now advising elected representatives of the people to initiate investigations and draft bills addressing these non-existent threats. Here are just a few of the urban legends that are circulating in the halls of state and federal legislative bodies courtesy of the whack job broadcasting set.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/seven_bizarre_conspiracy_theories_that_the_gop_takes_seriously_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/seven_bizarre_conspiracy_theories_that_the_gop_takes_seriously_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the Syria threat cooled?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/has_the_syria_threat_cooled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/has_the_syria_threat_cooled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunnis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hezbollah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conference with Assad and the opposition may buy Obama some time. But here's what it really means]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching Syria is like looking through a kaleidoscope. The picture seems to change dramatically in response to the slightest jolt, but the components remain the same. The past week has seen lots of jolts, but no real change in the elements that make up the sad picture.</p><p>Inside Syria, the regime’s forces have started an ethnic cleansing campaign in the west intended to clear Sunnis from areas its Alawite supporters want to secure for themselves. The regime has also successfully pushed south toward the Jordanian border. In much of the rest of the country, there is lots of fighting but only marginal changes in the confrontation lines, which run through many urban areas, or between the urban centers and the countryside. Almost 7 million Syrians are now thought to need humanitarian assistance. The number could rise dramatically during the rest of the year.</p><p>Secretary Kerry’s visit to Moscow this week revived, once again, hopes for a negotiated settlement. He and the Russians agreed to try to convene a conference, even before the end of the month, that would include both the Syrian opposition and the Assad regime. The prospect of this conference will relieve President Obama of any need for a quick decision on unilateral action in Syria, since it would hardly be appropriate to preempt the conference. That is likely what both the Russians and the Americans wanted: more time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/has_the_syria_threat_cooled/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/has_the_syria_threat_cooled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan&#8217;s highest court rules U.S. drone strikes illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/pakistans_highest_court_rules_u_s_drone_strikes_illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/pakistans_highest_court_rules_u_s_drone_strikes_illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peshawar high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judges said that since innocent civilians have been killed, the strikes should be considered war crimes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The highest court in Pakistan ruled Thursday that U.S. drone strikes are illegal. The Peshawar High Court advised the Pakistani government to to move a resolution against the attacks in the United Nations, the U.K.'s Independent newspaper <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/pakistani-court-declares-us-drone-strikes-in-the-countrys-tribal-belt-illegal-8609843.html">reported.</a></p><p>The ruling bolsters <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/u_n_official_u_s_drone_strikes_violate_pakistan_sovereignty/">recent claims </a>made by U.N. human rights expert Ben Emmerson Q.C., following a visit to Pakistan, that authorities in the country gave no consent, tacit or otherwise, for the CIA strikes to be carried out in its tribal regions. However, reporting by Mark Mazzetti <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/the_secret_kill_deal_that_began_cias_pakistan_drone_war/">suggests that a secret deal</a>, forged between the CIA and the Pakistani military, gave the go-ahead for U.S. drone strikes in return for the initial targeting of an enemy of the Pakistani state (not an al-Qaida operative).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/pakistans_highest_court_rules_u_s_drone_strikes_illegal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/pakistans_highest_court_rules_u_s_drone_strikes_illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How drones deceive us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The advantage of technologized warfare is also its most worrying: The perception of decreased risk to the aggressor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the brave new world of technologized warfare, every week seems to bring a new sci-fi-movie-worthy revelation about America's ongoing drone operations. This past week was no exception. From the <a href="http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013/may/02/us-drone-strikes-guantanamo">lawyer</a> who first outlined White House policy on drone attacks, we learned that the government is likely using such attacks instead of capturing alleged terrorists, all to avoid the thorny legal issues that come with prisoner detainment. From the <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-point-of-no-return-should-robots-be-able-to-decide-to-kill-you-on-their-own-20130430">United Nations</a>, we learned that the world may be closer to seeing its first self-directed Terminator-style killing machines -- technically called "Lethal Autonomous Robots" -- than many may have previously thought.</p><p>These kind of stories will continue for one big, if unstated, reason: robotic warfare seems to hold the promise of making many things easier, cheaper and less risky, at least for the countries that operate the drones. But the operative word is "seems," for drones involve a problematic illusion that distorts our perception of the risks we face.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_drones_deceive_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN: Gitmo force-feeding is inhumane</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/un_gitmo_force_feeding_is_inhumane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/un_gitmo_force_feeding_is_inhumane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guantanamo hunger strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[force-feeding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senior UN officials say that the force-feeding of hunger strikers breaches international medical standards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guantanamo Bay prison camp has for some time been<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/navy_sends_extra_medics_to_deal_with_gitmo_hunger_strikers/singleton/"> an abrogation</a> of international legal standards. Now, say senior UN officials, the camp is acting against international medical standards too with the force feeding of hunger strikers. Of the over 100 detainees officially on hunger strike (although attorneys claim the number is even higher) 21 are receiving feeding through nasal tubes.</p><p>In <a href="http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=13278&amp;LangID=E">a statement</a> signed by El Hadji Malick Sow, chair of the UN working group on arbitrary detention; Juan E Méndez, UN special rapporteur on torture; Ben Emmerson, UN special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights, and Anand Grover, UN special rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health and supported by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the force-feeding is roundly decried:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/un_gitmo_force_feeding_is_inhumane/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/un_gitmo_force_feeding_is_inhumane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Partier charged for threatening lawmaker over Agenda 21</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/tea_partier_charged_for_threatening_lawmaker_over_agenda_21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/tea_partier_charged_for_threatening_lawmaker_over_agenda_21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agenda 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The co-founder of an Oklahoma tea party group was charged with two felonies, including blackmail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Oklahoma Tea Partier was charged with two felony counts for allegedly sending a threatening email to a state lawmaker, pushing him to support legislation that would block Agenda 21 from being implemented in the state.</p><p>Al Gerhart, the co-founder of the Sooner Tea Party, was on Tuesday charged with blackmail and violating the Oklahoma Computer Crimes Act, both felonies. Gerhart admitted last week to sending the email to state senator Cliff Branan, though he denies he did anything wrong. The charges came after Branan turned the email over to state officials.</p><p>From the <a href="http://newsok.com/sooner-tea-party-co-founder-charged-with-blackmailing-oklahoma-state-senator/article/3781569/?page=1">Oklahoman</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Misspelling one word, Gerhart wrote: “Branan, Get that bill heard or I will make sure you regret not doing it. I will make you the laughing stock of the Senate if I don't hear that this bill will be heard and passed. We will dig into your past, yoru family, your associates and once we start on you there will be no end to it. This is a promise.”</p> <p>Gerhart admitted at a news conference at the Capitol last week that he sent the email.</p> <p>“Political pain and embarrassment will be necessary if the citizens expect to regain control of this Senate down here from the state chamber of commerce and special interests,” he said. “The time for ‘nice' behavior is over with.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/tea_partier_charged_for_threatening_lawmaker_over_agenda_21/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/tea_partier_charged_for_threatening_lawmaker_over_agenda_21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma Tea Partyer threatens legislator over Agenda 21</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tea_party_leader_threatens_oklahoma_goper_over_agenda_21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tea_party_leader_threatens_oklahoma_goper_over_agenda_21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agenda 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Tea Partyer told an Oklahoma legislator that he'd "regret" not pushing legislation to stop it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Oklahoma state senator says that he was concerned about an email he received from a local Tea Party leader pushing him to support legislation to block Agenda 21, so much so that he turned the email over to the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigations.</p><p>Republican state Sen. Cliff Branan asked the OSBI to investigate an email he received from Al Gerhart, the co-founder of the Sooner Tea Party, that strongly urged Branan to back legislation that would prevent the U.N.'s Agenda 21 from being implemented in the state.</p><p>Agenda 21 is a non-binding U.N. agreement aimed at promoting sustainable development, though right-wing conspiracy theorists believe it is "a really nice way of saying ‘centralized control over all of human life on planet Earth,’” as Glenn Beck has put it.</p><p>A number of states have considered and advanced legislation to block Agenda 21, and an Oklahoma state senator <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/oklahoma_goper_introduces_bill_targeting_agenda_21/">introduced</a> a bill in December to do the same. The bill is now heading to the Senate Energy and Environment Committee, which Branan chairs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tea_party_leader_threatens_oklahoma_goper_over_agenda_21/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/tea_party_leader_threatens_oklahoma_goper_over_agenda_21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. development chief slams War on Drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helen Clark, a former health minister, says criminalizing drugs has created more problems than it has solved]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" /></a></p><p><strong>Helen Clark</strong>, the head of the United Nations Development Program, has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/15/us-un-drugs-idUSBRE92E01W20130315" target="_blank">publicly slammed</a> global strategies to combat drugs, claiming there is increasing evidence that "the war on drugs" has failed. The former prime minister of New Zealand urged Latin American leaders to develop new policies to tackle drugs, which she says should be addressed as a public health problem rather than criminalized. "I've been a health minister in my past and there's no doubt that the health position would be to treat the issue of drugs as primarily a health and social issue rather than a criminalized issue," she told <em>Reuters</em>. "Once you criminalize, you put very big stakes around. Of course, our world has proceeded on the basis that criminalization is the approach. To deal with drugs as a one-dimensional, law-and-order issue is to miss the point." Although she did not directly comment on US involvement in the drug war, her words have been widely interpreted as a criticism of US drug policy, which she later denied. "She was speaking about the negative effects the drug trade has had on development in some Latin American countries in the context of the Human Development Report," said UNDP spokeswoman <strong>Christina LoNigro</strong> in a statement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/un_development_chief_slams_war_on_drugs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United Nations&#8217; pot hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/united_nations_pot_hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/united_nations_pot_hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science says marijuana is safer than alcohol. So why is the U.N. trying to stop legalization laws?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion of alcohol consumers piously demanding that others stop using pot probably makes you think of the beer-swilling World War II generation berating weed-smoking hippies during the 1960s. Now, thanks to the United Nations, that caricature gets an update, and the hypocrisy is at once amusing and depressing.</p><p>You may have read the headline-grabbing news that in advance of its conference on drug policy this week, the U.N. issued a report urging the United States government to block Colorado and Washington state from moving forward with voter-approved laws that allow adult citizens to use marijuana as a less harmful alternative to alcohol. What you may not have heard is that on the very same day the U.N. released that report, U.S. ambassador Joseph Torsella slammed his U.N. colleagues for drinking too much on the job. Apparently, binging at the U.N. is so commonplace and excessive that it is hindering the organization from conducting its most basic work.</p><p>As hypocrisy humor goes, this is pretty funny. An international body immersed in one drug (alcohol) yet telling governments to outlaw an objectively less harmful drug (marijuana) is biting comedy. It hilariously exemplifies the double standards and contradictions that still define many global leaders' views of drugs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/united_nations_pot_hypocrisy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/united_nations_pot_hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. could fuel North Korea&#8217;s propaganda machine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/un_sanctions_may_play_into_north_korean_propaganda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/un_sanctions_may_play_into_north_korean_propaganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Jong Un]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pyongyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/un_sanctions_may_play_into_north_korean_propaganda/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials may use the latest sanctions to whip up anti-U.S. sentiment and obscure their government's failures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Seven years of U.N. sanctions against North Korea have done nothing to derail Pyongyang's drive for a nuclear weapon capable of hitting the United States. They may have even bolstered the Kim family by giving their propaganda maestros ammunition to whip up anti-U.S. sentiment and direct attention away from government failures.</p><p>In the wake of fresh U.N. sanctions leveled at North Korea on Thursday for its latest nuclear test, the question is: Will this time be different?</p><p>Since 2006, North Korea has launched long-range rockets, tested a variety of missiles and conducted three underground nuclear explosions, the most recent on Feb. 12. Through it all, Pyongyang was undeterred by a raft of sanctions — both multilateral penalties from the United Nations and national sanctions from Washington, Tokyo and others — meant to punish the government and sidetrack its nuclear ambitions.</p><p>A problem with the approach, analysts said, is that outsiders routinely underestimate North Korea's knack for survival. The sanctions are intended to make life more difficult for a country that has crushing poverty, once suffered through a devastating famine and lost its Soviet backers long ago, but Pyongyang often manages to find some advantage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/un_sanctions_may_play_into_north_korean_propaganda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/un_sanctions_may_play_into_north_korean_propaganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN approves sanctions after North Korean nuke threat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/un_approves_sanctions_after_north_korean_nuke_threat_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/un_approves_sanctions_after_north_korean_nuke_threat_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pyongyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision came hours after Pyongyang ramped up its rhetoric to dizzying new heights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEOUL, South Korea — The United Nations Security Council <a href="https://twitter.com/brianwalkercnn/status/309686219338575874" target="_blank">voted unanimously to approve</a> new, tighter sanctions against North Korea on Thursday.</p><p>The vote on whether to increase sanctions against Pyongyang was prompted by the hermit kingdom's nuclear test last month. The UN decision came hours after North Korea had ramped up its rhetoric yet again, threatening a "preemptive" nuclear strike against the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/07/north-korea-threatens-nuclear-strike-us" target="_blank">The Associated Press quoted</a> a spokesman for North Korea's foreign ministry as saying that Pyonyang would "exercise the right to a pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the headquarters of the aggressors." According to the AP, the spokesman also alleged that Washington is gearing up to start a nuclear war against North Korea.</p><p>The country's foreign ministry <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130307/n-korea-threatens-pre-emptive-nuclear-strike-us" target="_blank">warned earlier this week</a> that a second Korean war is "unavoidable" now that both the United States and South Korea are refusing Pyongyang's demands to cancel large-scale joint military exercises.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/un_approves_sanctions_after_north_korean_nuke_threat_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/un_approves_sanctions_after_north_korean_nuke_threat_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea vows to nuke U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/north_korea_vows_to_nuke_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/north_korea_vows_to_nuke_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pyongyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Furious over sanctions, Pyongyang promises to launch a pre-emptive strike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEOUL, South Korea (AP) -- North Korea is vowing a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the United States. The harsh rhetoric Thursday comes hours ahead of a vote by U.N. diplomats on whether to level new sanctions against Pyongyang for its recent nuclear test.</p><p>An unidentified spokesman for Pyongyang's Foreign Ministry said the North will exercise its right for "pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the headquarters of the aggressors" because Washington is pushing to start a nuclear war against the North.</p><p>Such inflammatory rhetoric is common from North Korea. But it has been coming regularly in recent days. North Korea is angry over the possible sanctions and over upcoming U.S.-South Korean military drills.</p><p><img class="fiveminVideoPlayer" style="width: 570px; height: 411px; display: block;" src="https://spthumbnails.5min.com/10353093/517654626_1_570_411.jpg" alt="North Korea Makes Threat of Nuclear Tests" data-product="playerSeed" data-params="playList=517654626|||height=411|||width=570|||sid=1236|||origin=fts|||relatedMode=2|||relatedBottomHeight=60|||companionPos=|||hasCompanion=false|||autoStart=false|||colorPallet=%23FF0000|||videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919|||shuffle=0|||isAP=1" /></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/north_korea_vows_to_nuke_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/north_korea_vows_to_nuke_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The global war on terror&#8217;s forgotten victims: Women and children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost in the discussion of the war's civilian targets is the suffering their families are forced to endure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once, as a reporter, I covered wars, conflicts, civil wars, and even a genocide in places like Vietnam, Angola, Eritrea, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, keeping away from official briefings and listening to the people who were living the war. In the years since the Bush administration launched its Global War on Terror, I’ve done the same thing without ever leaving home.</p><p>In the last decade, I didn’t travel to distant refugee camps in Pakistan or destroyed villages in Afghanistan, nor did I spend time in besieged cities like Iraq’s Fallujah or Libya’s Misrata. I stayed in Great Britain. There, my government, in close conjunction with Washington, was pursuing its own version of what, whether anyone cared to say it or not, was essentially a war against Islam. Somehow, by a series of chance events, I found myself inside it, spending time with families transformed into enemies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/the_global_war_on_terrors_forgotten_victims_children_and_spouses_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can dachshunds teach us about international diplomacy?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/can_dachsunds_teach_us_about_international_diplomacy_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/can_dachsunds_teach_us_about_international_diplomacy_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperallergic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dachsunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bennett Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 World Stage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bennett Miller's "Dachshund UN" reimagines the Geneva forum populated with precocious pooches ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can possibly get over the adorable thing that is happening in this photo, let’s think about why exactly a bunch of cute dachshunds acting as 36 dog delegates in a replica United Nations assembly on Human Rights might be successful as a sort of experimental theatre. Australian artist Bennett Miller’s “<a href="http://www.harbourfrontcentre.com/worldstage/dachshundun/">Dachshund UN</a>“ opened yesterday in Toronto as part of the Harbourfront Centre’s <a href="http://www.harbourfrontcentre.com/worldstage/">2013 World Stage</a> performances, with a replica of the forum in Geneva as a stage for the organic chaos of the canine crowd. There is barking and biting and sometimes lunging attempts at small fights (don’t worry, the dogs are leashed and the owners hidden away nearby to keep things from getting too feral).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/can_dachsunds_teach_us_about_international_diplomacy_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/can_dachsunds_teach_us_about_international_diplomacy_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul sues supporters for control of RonPaul.com</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/10/ron_paul_sues_supporters_for_control_of_ronpaul_com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/10/ron_paul_sues_supporters_for_control_of_ronpaul_com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13196785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul asked the U.N. for help claiming control of his domain name]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul supporters are angry and confused about a <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/ron-paul-files-international-copyright-complaint-against-his">complaint</a> Paul filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization, an agency of the U.N., in attempt to regain control of RonPaul.com and RonPaul.org.</p><p>In a <a href="http://www.ronpaul.com/2013-02-08/ron-paul-vs-ronpaul-com/">blog post</a> on Friday, the site's owners wrote that after hearing Paul say on a radio show that he wished he owned the domain name, they offered to sell him RonPaul.com and their 170,000 supporter mailing list for $250,000, with RonPaul.org included as a "free gift."</p><p>"Instead of responding to our offer, making a counter offer, or even accepting our FREE gift of RonPaul.org, Ron Paul went to the United Nations and is trying to use its legal process related to domain name disputes to actively deport us from our domain names without compensation," the blog post said.</p><p>The post continued with a message of disappointment:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/10/ron_paul_sues_supporters_for_control_of_ronpaul_com/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/10/ron_paul_sues_supporters_for_control_of_ronpaul_com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN: Execution of 17-year-old domestic worker broke international law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/un_execution_of_17_year_old_domestic_worker_broke_international_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/un_execution_of_17_year_old_domestic_worker_broke_international_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human rights experts say Saudi Arabia broke international law by beheading a teenager accused of murder ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GENEVA (AP) — U.N. human rights experts say Saudi Arabia broke international law by beheading a Sri Lankan domestic worker accused of killing a Saudi baby in her care in 2005.</p><p>The U.N.'s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Christof Heyns, said Friday that it "is clear that it is unlawful to execute someone who was under 18 years old when they allegedly committed a crime."</p><p>On Wednesday, the Saudi Interior Ministry said Rizana Nafeek was given a death sentence and executed, despite appeals by the Sri Lanka government for a reprieve. The domestic worker had denied strangling the 4-month-old boy, who died when she was 17 years old.</p><p>Groups such as Human Rights Watch strongly condemned the execution. Heyns also said that "beheading is a particularly cruel form of execution."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/un_execution_of_17_year_old_domestic_worker_broke_international_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/un_execution_of_17_year_old_domestic_worker_broke_international_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN says far more deaths in Syria than earlier estimates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/un_says_far_more_deaths_in_syria_than_earlier_estimates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/un_says_far_more_deaths_in_syria_than_earlier_estimates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Around 60,000 people have been killed in the civil war, far more than what human rights organizations had thought]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.N. Wednesday upped its estimate of the number deaths in Syria's civil war to 60,000 --  significantly higher than previous estimates. The U.N. tally includes over 3,000 children last year.</p><p>Human rights activists in Syria had put the death toll at around 45,000 according to<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/01/02/syria-conflict/1803857/"> the AP</a>. In 2012 alone, according to the<a href="http://www.syrianhr.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1936:statement-on-the-death-toll-of-2012-&amp;catid=3:reports&amp;Itemid=11"> Syrian Network for Human Rights, </a>36,332 civilians were killed. The network specifically decried the Assad regimes record for killing civilians women and children:</p><blockquote><p>The proportion of women and children to the total number of victims is 5.2 which is a conclusive  evidence that the Syrian government is deliberately targeting civilians as the internationally recognized ratio in the case of regular warfare is 2%. The Syrian government has killed more than double that percentage and in some months the percentage was more than three times that benchmark.</p></blockquote><p>Last week the U.N.-Arab League envoy warned that 2013 could see over 100,000 more deaths in Syria if the civil war does not come to an end.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/un_says_far_more_deaths_in_syria_than_earlier_estimates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/un_says_far_more_deaths_in_syria_than_earlier_estimates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International envoy warns 100,000 could die in Syria next year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/international_envoy_warns_100000_could_die_in_syria_next_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/international_envoy_warns_100000_could_die_in_syria_next_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab league]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN-Arab League envoy said Syria risks "Somalization" if civil war goes on]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEIRUT (AP) — The international envoy to Syria warned Sunday that as many as 100,000 could die in the next year if a way cannot be found quickly to end the country's civil war.</p><p>Lakhdar Brahimi, the U.N.-Arab League envoy for the Syrian crisis, told reporters in Cairo that if the crisis continues Syria will not be divided into states "like what happened in Yugoslavia" but will face "Somalization, which means warlords, and the Syrian people will be persecuted by those who control their fate."</p><p>Syrian rebels are fighting a 21-month-old revolt against President Bashar Assad's regime. Activists say more than 40,000 people have been killed in the crisis, which began with pro-democracy protests but has morphed into a civil war.</p><p>Since starting his job in September, Brahimi has sought to advance an international plan, reached in Geneva six months ago, that calls for an open-ended cease-fire between rebels and government troops and the formation of a transitional government to run the country until elections can be held.</p><p>Over the past week Brahimi went to Damascus where he met Assad then flew to Moscow, one of Syria's closest international allies, where he discussed ways of ending the country's crisis.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/international_envoy_warns_100000_could_die_in_syria_next_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/international_envoy_warns_100000_could_die_in_syria_next_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
