<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > U.S. Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/us_economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Predictions for tomorrow&#8217;s jobs report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/dont_get_your_hopes_up_for_tomorrows_jobs_report_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/dont_get_your_hopes_up_for_tomorrows_jobs_report_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fixed Income]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given last month’s numbers, we can’t rule out the possibility we've actually lost jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m expecting 130K on total payrolls and 135K on private, so I’m below consensus, which <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/economic-calendar/">Bloomberg</a> puts at 153K for the total.  I expect the unemployment rate to maybe tick up a tenth.</p><p>And that’s all the time we should spend forecasting these volatile monthly numbers.  More interesting, I think, is the question of why everyone gets so wrapped up in the monthly numbers when the actual signal-to-noise ratio they yield is not that high.  The 90% confidence interval around the payroll number, for example, is about 100,000, meaning there’s a 90% chance that the actual change in payrolls in a given month is that much higher or lower than the reported change.  So, given last month’s initial print of 88,000, we can’t rule out the possibility we actually lost jobs.</p><p>Well, one reason for all the attention, courtesy of GS analysts, is that the jobs report doesn’t just move markets.  It moves markets far more than any other economic indicator.  The figure below plots how equity futures and the yield on the 10-year T-bill respond to upside surprises in the various indicators we all pour over.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/dont_get_your_hopes_up_for_tomorrows_jobs_report_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/dont_get_your_hopes_up_for_tomorrows_jobs_report_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 insidious ways you&#8217;re getting ripped off</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And how to fight back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a><strong>I</strong>n the wake of the financial crisis, there was a moment<strong></strong>of hope that predatory businesses would no longer be able to pick at our bones like vultures. Instead, we've seen Dodd-Frank weakened and stalled, and the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau stymied at every turn. In the latest round, Republicans are thwarting the confirmation of Richard Cordray to lead the Bureau. Meanwhile, we continue to get fleeced. Here are a few egregious scams to watch out for, along with ways to protect yourself.</p><p><strong>1. Auto-renewal scams</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When nothing trickles down</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/when_nothing_trickles_down_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/when_nothing_trickles_down_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trickle-down economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fed's policy of keeping interest rates near zero can only benefit the richest 10 percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fed’s policy of keeping interest rates near zero is another form of trickle-down economics.</p><p>For evidence, look no further than Apple’s <a href="http://www.wired.com/business/2013/05/why-fabulously-wealthy-apple-is-borrowing-money/">decision</a> to borrow a whopping $17 billion and turn it over to its investors in the form of dividends and stock buy-backs.</p><p>Apple is already sitting on $145 billion. But with interest rates so low, it’s cheaper to borrow. This also lets Apple avoid U.S. taxes on its cash horde socked away overseas where taxes are lower.</p><p>Other big companies are doing much the same on a smaller scale.</p><p>Who gains from all this? The richest 10 percent of Americans who own 90 percent of all shares of stock.</p><p>But little or nothing is trickling down. The average American can’t borrow at nearly the low rates Apple or any other big company can. Most Americans no longer have a credit rating that allows them to borrow much of anything.</p><p>It would be one thing if Apple and other giant companies were borrowing in order to expand operations and create new jobs. But that’s not what’s going on. Apple, remember, is still sitting on $145 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/when_nothing_trickles_down_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/when_nothing_trickles_down_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s staggering education gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/americas_staggering_education_gap_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/americas_staggering_education_gap_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindergarten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Reardon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Students of wealthy families are increasingly better prepared for kindergarten than their lower class schoolmates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want my advice, you should pour a tall cup-a-Joe and settle in to read <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/27/no-rich-child-left-behind/?ref=opinion">this essay</a> by Sean Reardon in this AMs NYT on education and wealth.  He covers a lot of ground, but the theme that resonated most with me is one I’ve stressed often in these parts regarding the growing evidence of linkages between increased income inequality and diminished opportunities.  A prominent channel through which this occurs is, of course, education.</p><p>It’s not just that rich kids do better in school than poor kids.  That’s an old problem.</p><blockquote><p>What is news is that in the United States over the last few decades these differences in educational success between high- and lower-income students have grown substantially.</p></blockquote><p>Moreover, these growing differences show up in college access and completion.</p><blockquote><p>…the proportion of students from upper-income families who earn a bachelor’s degree has increased by 18 percentage points over a 20-year period, while the completion rate of poor students has grown by only 4 points.</p> <p>…15 percent of high-income students from the high school class of 2004 enrolled in a highly selective college or university, while fewer than 5 percent of middle-income and 2 percent of low-income students did.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/americas_staggering_education_gap_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/americas_staggering_education_gap_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t be fooled by today&#8217;s economic growth report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The economy may have expanded at a rate of 2.5 percent over the first quarter, but that's unlikely to last]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As expected, the economy grew more quickly at the beginning of this year than at the end of 2012, according to this morning’s GDP release.  Real GDP was up at a yearly rate of 2.5% over the first quarter, compared to a mere 0.4% in the prior three months.</p><p>But only slightly beneath the surface, the report showed continuing weaknesses in the US economy and, consistent with the unexpectedly weak March jobs report, hints at another softening of demand in recent months.  Expectations were for growth above 3% but disposable income, a critical driver of growth in our 70% consumption economy, fell sharply, down 5% in real terms, partly due the loss of the payroll tax break.</p><p>The two main factors propelling the economy forward last quarter were firms restocking their shelves (inventory build-up adds to GDP growth) and strong spending by the stalwart American consumer, drawing not on their income but on their savings.  Since the inventory component is both highly volatile and less indicative of current demand, it’s useful to look at final demand, essentially GDP without the inventory build-up.  This measure grew 1.5% in real terms in the first quarter, down from 1.9% in the last quarter.  Again, this less volatile measure tracks demand more closely than the headline number.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dont_be_fooled_by_economic_growth_report_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. economy expands 2.5 percent through first quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But government spending has fallen, and the combination of tax increases and budget cuts could slow future growth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. economic growth accelerated to an annual rate of 2.5 percent from January through March, buoyed by the strongest consumer spending in more than two years. Government spending fell, though, and tax increases and federal budget cuts could slow growth later this year.</p><p>The Commerce Department said Friday that the economy rebounded from an anemic 0.4 percent annual growth rate in the October-December quarter. Consumer spending surged at an annual rate of 3.2 percent — its biggest jump since the end of 2010.</p><p>Growth was also helped by businesses, which responded to the greater demand by rebuilding their stockpiles. And home construction rose further.</p><p>Government spending sank at a 4.1 percent annual rate, led by another deep cut in defense spending. The decline kept last quarter's increase in economic growth below expectations of a 3 percent rate or more.</p><p>Many economists say they think growth as measured by the gross domestic product is slowing in the April-June quarter to an annual rate of just 2 percent. Most foresee growth remaining around that subpar level for the rest of the year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Day&#8217;s dirty secret: There&#8217;s no penalty for filing late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few taxpayers realize that you only have to pay a fee if you already owe back taxes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's a little secret for all you procrastinators on Tax Day: The Internal Revenue Service doesn't like to talk about it, but as long as you don't owe any additional taxes, there is no penalty for filing a few days late.</p><p>The late filing penalty is usually 5 percent of the unpaid taxes for each month — or part of a month — a return is late. That can add up quickly if you owe additional taxes. But what if the unpaid taxes are zero? Five percent of zero is ... zero!</p><p>However, if you wait more than three years to file, you forfeit your refund. So maybe it's better to file by Monday, after all. Besides, if you're getting a refund, why wait?</p><p>The IRS got a late start on tax season this year, thanks to a last-minute tax law passed by Congress on Jan. 1. But the deadline for filing returns didn't change, so if you owe money, it's time to settle up with the government.</p><p>In all, the IRS expects to process 149 million returns from individuals this year, including returns from people who file for 6-month extensions. About a quarter of returns are usually filed in the last three weeks before Tax Day. This year the IRS received more than 10 million electronically filed returns from Friday through Sunday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/psst_tax_deadline_not_much_of_a_deadline_for_most_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 reasons state lotteries ruin the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Lotteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virgnia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lottery tickets serve as a hidden tax on the poor and siphon up to $50 billion a year away from local businesses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> State lotteries amount to a hidden tax on the poor. They eat up about 9 percent of take-home incomes from households making less than $13,000 a year. They siphon $50 billion a year away from local businesses—besides stores where they’re sold. And they are encouraged by state-sponsored ads suggesting everyone can win, win, win!</p><p>State lotteries, which once were illegal, now exist in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotteries_in_the_United_States">most states</a>. What many people don’t know about lotteries is that they prey on those who can least afford it; most people never win anything big; and 11 states raise more money from lotteries than from corporate taxes. Beyond the moral, mental health or religious debates over gambling, lotteries are another example of how society preys on the poor and the working-class.</p><p>Let’s look at why state lotteries do far more harm than good—especially at the bottom of the economic ladder.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLK&#8217;s &#8220;Two Americas&#8221; truer than ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLK Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Two Americas"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The inequality King highlighted continues to grow worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may think you know about Martin Luther King, Jr., but there is much about the man and his message we have conveniently forgotten. He was a prophet, like Amos, Isaiah and Jeremiah of old, calling kings and plutocrats to account — speaking truth to power.</p><p>King was only 39 when he was murdered in Memphis 45 years ago, on April 4th, 1968. The 1963 March on Washington and the 1965 March from Selma to Montgomery were behind him. So was the successful passage of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act. In the last year of his life, as he moved toward Memphis and his death, he announced what he called the Poor People’s Campaign, a “multi-racial army” that would come to Washington, build an encampment and demand from Congress an “Economic Bill of Rights” for all Americans — black, white, or brown. He had long known that the fight for racial equality could not be separated from the need for economic equity — fairness for all, including working people and the poor.</p><p>Martin Luther King, Jr., had more than a dream — he envisioned what America could be, if only it lived up to its promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for each and every citizen. That’s what we have conveniently forgotten as the years have passed and his reality has slowly been shrouded in the marble monuments of sainthood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/mlks_two_americas_truer_than_ever_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing Obama&#8217;s &#8220;fix it first&#8221; infrastructure plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the U.S. wants to create more jobs and compete with emerging markets, it can't focus on existing roads alone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bostonreview.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/title-e1356145289357.jpeg" alt="Boston Review" align="left" /></a>Seventy thousand bridges in America are structurally deficient. Fixing this and other critical problems with our national infrastructure is a policy no-brainer.</p><p>In this year’s State of the Union address, President Obama unveiled his “fix it first” plan, a $50 billion program for repairing the nation’s roads, highways, bridges and transit systems. Although this is a step in the right direction, the plan should also meet the concerns of the newly emerging transportation-justice movement, about which we have heard nothing from the president so far.</p><p>The Obama administration last directed major funds toward infrastructure as a part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The government spent more than $31 billion, with a focus on “shovel-ready” projects.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank stole your house? Have 10 pitchforks&#8217; worth of compensation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bank_stole_your_house_have_10_pitchforks_worth_of_compensation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bank_stole_your_house_have_10_pitchforks_worth_of_compensation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alexis Goldstein is listing items victims of wrongful foreclosure can afford with piddling OCC settlement sums]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First as tragedy, then as farce. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced Tuesday details of how much money the banks will pay homeowners who were found to be wrongfully foreclosed on, or who suffered financial harm at the hands of the banks. Just as a sampling, individuals who had loan modifications approved by banks but were still foreclosed upon will receive a paltry $300. Six hundred seventy-nine people were faced with foreclosure even though they were never once in default; they will be compensated $5,000.</p><p>Former Wall Street V.P. and current Occupy Wall Street activist and member of Strike Debt Alexis Goldstein took it upon herself Tuesday to put the payouts in a little context. She created a site detailing <a href="http://forhavingmyhousestolen.tumblr.com/">"What You Can Buy for Having Your House Stolen,"</a> on which she lists a varied taxonomy of items the compensation can afford wrongfully foreclosed individuals -- all the items that are <em>not your house back. </em>Goldstein told Salon via email, "I'm hoping to (1) draw attention to the OCC, one of the lesser-known banking regulators who are completely captured by the banks. (2) point out how egregiously low these settlement numbers are."</p><p>We thought we'd pick out some of Goldstein's choice examples to drive the message home in the following slideshow. (All slideshow text from Goldstein's forhavingmyhousestolen.tumblr.com)</p><p>[slide_show id=13266186]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bank_stole_your_house_have_10_pitchforks_worth_of_compensation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bank_stole_your_house_have_10_pitchforks_worth_of_compensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>`Target the underemployed, not just the unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To reinvigorate the labor market, we have to help underutilized and part-time workers as well as those without jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we wanted to target the persistent slack in the labor market, though I can’t see any signs that we do, we shouldn’t just target the unemployment rate; we should also go after the <em>under</em>employment rate.  Since it captures the important dimension of not just do you have a job, but are you getting the hours of work you want, it’s a more comprehensive measure of the extent to which workers are underutilized – i.e., slack – in the labor market.</p><p>The difference is pretty well known by now: the underemployment rate includes various groups of underutilized workers or job seekers who are left out of the official rate.  The largest difference is the inclusion of part-time workers who would rather have full-time jobs.  Most recently, there were about 8 million such folks, elevating this measure of underutilization to around 14 percent compared to about 8 percent for unemployment (2013Q1).  Other components of this rate include discouraged workers who’ve recently looked for work but given up, and some other smaller groups that are neither working nor looking for work but remain marginally attached to the job market.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. economy adds 88,000 jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Labor Department says the unemployment rate dipped to 7.6 percent from 7.7 percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- U.S. employers added just 88,000 jobs in March, the fewest in nine months and a sharp retreat after a period of strong hiring. The slowdown is a reminder that the job market's path back to health will be uneven.</p><p>The Labor Department says the unemployment rate dipped to 7.6 percent from 7.7 percent. While that is the lowest in four years, the rate fell only because more people stopped looking for work.</p><p>The weakness may signal that companies were worried last month about steep government spending cuts that began on March 1.</p><p>March's job gains were half the pace of the previous six months, when the economy added an average of 196,000 jobs a month. The drop raises fears that the economy could slow after a stronger winter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/u_s_economy_adds_88000_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is capitalism hazardous to mankind?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_capitalism_hazardous_to_mankind_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_capitalism_hazardous_to_mankind_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Walrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pursuit of economic growth has made us addicted to risk -- and left us vulnerable to catastrophic disasters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thewalrus.ca/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/WalrusNameplate-e1362787342439.jpg" alt="The Walrus" /></a> CAN OUR SOCIETY take pre-emptive action to forestall devastating climate change? Can it act now to avoid wars over oil and natural gas? Can it take steps today to avoid economic crises stemming from spiking oil prices? The answer, unfortunately, is no, no, and no. Our institutions, public and private, are not designed for prudent action. They are designed to facilitate risk taking and to address negative consequences, if they arise, later on. Only in the face of disaster, when there is a clear and present danger, are we capable of mobilizing an appropriate response.</p><p>The problem is not ignorance; it is not that we are unaware of the risks we take. Nor do we lack the instruments to deal with them. The problem, deeply embedded in the architecture of our decision making, is that in the pursuit of economic growth we privatize reward and socialize downside risk. To describe this tendency, economists borrow a term, “moral hazard,” from the insurance industry. A moral hazard exists whenever decision makers in risky situations reap the rewards from their decisions without bearing all of the costs. The ability to pass downside costs on to others encourages imprudent decision making.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_capitalism_hazardous_to_mankind_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_capitalism_hazardous_to_mankind_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysts: Cyprus bailout will cripple euro zone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/analysts_cyprus_bailout_will_cripple_euro_zone_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/analysts_cyprus_bailout_will_cripple_euro_zone_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even in the best-case scenarios, they warn, the country remains at risk of default]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="www.outsports.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/logo_300x501-e1364224707606.png" alt="International Business Times" /></a> Wall Street analysts weren't impressed by the deal struck to bail out Cyprus, emphasizing that even in best-case scenarios the country remains at risk of default.</p><p>"The system's profile as an offshore financial center is unlikely to survive this crisis," Moody's senior credit officer Sarah Carlson said. "The potentially irreparable damage to the country's current drivers of economic growth leaves its ability to sustain its current debt highly in doubt."</p><p>The crisis had negative implications for the credit ratings of the region's countries. Moody's Investors' Service says Cyprus will still be at risk of default for a "prolonged period" and possibly a euro zone exit. "Even if negotiations are successful and Cyprus remains within the euro area," the service said in a Monday statement, "policy makers' recent decisions raise the risk of deposit outflows, capital flight, increased bank and sovereign-funding costs and broader financial market dislocation."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/analysts_cyprus_bailout_will_cripple_euro_zone_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/analysts_cyprus_bailout_will_cripple_euro_zone_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weak supply and labor hurts U.S. builder confidence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/weak_supply_and_labor_hurts_u_s_builder_confidence_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/weak_supply_and_labor_hurts_u_s_builder_confidence_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Increased demand for new homes is exceeding supplies of ready-to-build land, building materials and workers ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confidence among U.S. homebuilders fell this month because of concerns that increased demand for new homes is exceeding supplies of ready-to-build land, building materials and workers.</p><p>In the short term, those constraints could slow sales. But builders' outlook for sales over the next six months has reached its strongest point in more than six years.</p><p>The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo builder sentiment index released Monday fell to 44 from 46 in February. It was the second decline since January, which was preceded by eight straight monthly gains. A measure of current sales conditions declined from February's reading.</p><p>Readings below 50 suggest negative sentiment about the housing market. The last time the index was at 50 or higher was in April 2006.</p><p>The index began trending higher in October 2011, when it was 17. That increase coincided with the start of a housing recovery.</p><p>An improving job market, persistently low mortgage rates and rising home values have helped fuel U.S. homes over the past year. New-home sales jumped 16 percent in January to the highest level since July 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/weak_supply_and_labor_hurts_u_s_builder_confidence_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/weak_supply_and_labor_hurts_u_s_builder_confidence_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does anyone still take Paul Ryan seriously?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His failed V.P. bid may have made him a national figure, but his budget plan is hopelessly out of touch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zipping across the land with a nice internet connection, so a good time to reflect a bit (looking down on clouds from above broadens the perspective a bit, I find).</p><p>So, I’m doing a radio interview last night, and moderately impressed with myself for being able to speak coherently about four different budgets: Ryan’s, Senate’s, POTUS (not out yet, but we can guess at the mix), and the <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/amidst-the-madness-lets-not-overlook-the-cdcs-budget/">CPC</a>.  Then I got asked a question which threw me a bit: why are Paul Ryan and his budget taken so seriously?</p><p>It wasn’t a snarky question.  It’s just that I’d been discussing the absolute non-reality of his proposal—how the numbers don’t begin to add up, the unrealistic budget cuts, the plethora of magic asterisks in the absence of actual proposals (the most egregious of which is: I’ll cuts taxes by $6-7 trillion over the next decade and offset the revenue losses with…um…sorry, gotta run).  And the interviewer was like, “OK…but if you’re right, why is his budget front page news such that he’s driving the debate?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Reich: Raising the minimum wage is only fair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/robert_reich_raising_the_minimum_wage_is_only_fair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/robert_reich_raising_the_minimum_wage_is_only_fair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bumping the hourly rate up to $9.00 would put more money into the hands of families who desperately need it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ct8CGJy9eF8?wmode=transparent&amp;autohide=1&amp;egm=0&amp;hd=1&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;rel=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;showsearch=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/robert_reich_raising_the_minimum_wage_is_only_fair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/robert_reich_raising_the_minimum_wage_is_only_fair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP confuses government and family budgets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan's newest plan focuses solely on the deficit and distracts from real economic goals, like jobs and wages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Our biggest problems over the next ten years are not deficits,” the President told House Republicans Wednesday, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/us/politics/obama-to-meet-with-house-gop-over-budget.html">according to those who attended</a> the meeting.</p><p>The President needs to deliver the same message to the public, loudly and clearly. The biggest problems we face are unemployment, stagnant wages, slow growth, and widening inequality — not deficits. The major goal must be to get jobs and wages back, not balance the budget.</p><p>Paul Ryan’s budget plan — essentially, the House Republican plan — is designed to lure the White House and Democrats, and the American public, into a debate over how to balance the federal budget in ten years, not over whether it’s worth doing.</p><p>“This is an invitation,” Ryan explained when he unveiled the plan Tuesday. “Show us how to balance the budget. If you don’t like the way we’re proposing to balance our budget, how do you propose to balance the budget?”</p><p>Until now the President has seemed all too willing to engage in that debate. His ongoing talk of a “grand bargain” to reduce the budget deficit has played directly into Republican hands.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/government_budgets_are_not_like_family_budgets_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Reich explains why you won&#8217;t get rich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former labor secretary says Washington's fiscal priorities are dangerously out of whack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former labor secretary <a href="http://www.upworthy.com/trying-to-get-richer-heres-why-you-can-pretty-much-give-up-now">Robert Reich</a> says, "The idea that most Americans have been living beyond their means is pure fantasy perpetrated by a small minority at the top whose means have gone through the stratosphere."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uB_Yuo6XNAA" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/robert_reich_explains_why_you_wont_get_rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>