<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > U.S. House of Representatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/us_house_of_representatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:01:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>House approves $9.7 billion in Sandy aid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/house_approves_9_7_billion_in_sandy_aid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/house_approves_9_7_billion_in_sandy_aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurrican Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandy aid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The overwhelmingly supported vote came days after Speaker Boehner was decried for delaying decision on aid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- More than two months after Superstorm Sandy struck, the House on Friday overwhelmingly approved $9.7 billion to pay flood insurance claims for the many home and business owners flooded out by the storm.</p><p>The 354-67 vote came days after Northeast Republicans erupted over House Speaker John Boehner's decision to delay a vote earlier in the week; all of the no votes were cast by Republicans. The Senate was expected to pass the bill later in the day.</p><p>"It's the right step," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., a member of the House Appropriations Committee.</p><p>The bill gives more borrowing authority to the National Flood Insurance Program to pay about 115,000 pending Sandy-related claims as well as about 5,000 claims unrelated to Sandy.</p><p>Northeast lawmakers say the money is urgently needed for victims of one of the worst storms ever to strike the region. The Federal Emergency Management Agency had warned that the National Flood Insurance Program would run out of money next week if Congress didn't provide additional borrowing authority to pay out claims. Congress created the FEMA-run program in 1968 because few private insurers cover flood damage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/house_approves_9_7_billion_in_sandy_aid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/house_approves_9_7_billion_in_sandy_aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, East Coast Republicans, but this is your party too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor helps the GOP keep power -- then doesn't like the results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spare me, Chris Christie. The New Jersey governor <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/chris_christie_gops_toxic_politics_to_blame_for_delayed_sandy_aid/">delighted political reporters</a> with his theatrical excoriation of the Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives after Speaker John Boehner refused to allow a bill funding aid for people affected by Hurricane Sandy to come to the floor for a vote this week.</p><p>This would be the same Christie who, in September 2012, headlined <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81052.html">a fundraiser for Iowa congressman Steve King</a>, who is not just one of the craziest members of the GOP crazy wing, but who also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/31/steve-king-hurricane-sandy_n_2047553.html">announced a month later that he probably wouldn't vote for relief money for Sandy victims</a> for the same reason he refused to vote for federal aid for victims of Hurricane Katrina: Because he was pretty sure people spent the relief money on "Gucci bags and massage parlors." This is a man Christie wanted to win reelection, in order to help Republicans maintain control of the House of Representatives, so that they could continue ignoring the priorities and desperate needs of liberal, urban coastal states like New Jersey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative scholar floats Jon Huntsman as Speaker replacement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/conservative_scholar_floats_jon_huntsman_as_speaker_replacement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/conservative_scholar_floats_jon_huntsman_as_speaker_replacement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Huntsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Ornstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norm Ornstein offers the unlikely suggestion that Huntsman should replace John Boehner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm Ornstein, a scholar for the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute, suggests that there is a possibility that John Boehner could be ousted as Speaker of the House, and, if he is, that Republicans should look beyond the House for a replacement. Namely, Jon Huntsman.</p><p>Writing in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/if-boehner-goes-look-outside-washington-for-a-new-speaker/2012/12/25/10bffa0e-4dfa-11e2-950a-7863a013264b_story.html?hpid=z2">Washington Post</a>, Ornstein theorizes that "If 17 Republicans vote for someone other than Boehner, and he falls short of an absolute majority of all the votes cast, the House will be thrown into turmoil — no elected speaker, and the prospect of additional ballots and a whole lot of intrigue before the new speaker is chosen and sworn in."</p><p>Citing Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution, he argues that the Constitution does not say specifically that the speaker must be a member of the House.</p><p>Fromt the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/if-boehner-goes-look-outside-washington-for-a-new-speaker/2012/12/25/10bffa0e-4dfa-11e2-950a-7863a013264b_story_1.html">Post</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/conservative_scholar_floats_jon_huntsman_as_speaker_replacement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/conservative_scholar_floats_jon_huntsman_as_speaker_replacement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner&#8217;s Christmas gift to you is a guarantee that the Republican House will destroy the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The failure of "Plan B" puts us on the path to default]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, we learned that Speaker of the House John Boehner <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/20/politics/fiscal-cliff/index.html">has no control over his majority.</a> We've seen Boehner have trouble with his caucus before, of course -- a significant portion of these people are crazy -- but the failure of "Plan B" was different. In the past Boehner has had trouble whipping votes to support things that were destined to become law. Boehner couldn't get his caucus to support TARP because TARP was awful and was also definitely going to happen. Boehner <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/boehner-other-gop-leaders-ramp-up-pressure-on-republicans-to-pass-debt-plan/2011/07/28/gIQARD5veI_story.html">couldn't get the votes for the 2011 debt deal</a> because conservatives thought they'd eventually force an even better deal. But this was a totally symbolic gesture that never had any shot at passing the Senate or getting signed by the president. Boehner's "Plan B" was a stupid pointless empty gesture, and that is why its failure is actually slightly scary, in addition to <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/336287">being hilarious.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican House built on dark money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It couldn't buy them the White House, but Republicans have super PAC cash to thank for their House majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> In the November election, a million more Americans <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/us/politics/redistricting-helped-republicans-hold-onto-congress.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">voted</a> for Democrats seeking election to the U.S. House of Representatives than Republicans. But that popular vote advantage did not result in control of the chamber. Instead, despite getting fewer votes, Republicans have maintained a commanding control of the House. Such a disparity has happened only three times in the last century.</p><p>(<a href="http://projects.propublica.org/graphics/seats-vs-votes">Here’s a chart comparing 2010 and 2012</a>.)</p><p>Analysts and others have identified redistricting as a key to the disparity. Republicans had a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/us/politics/redistricting-helped-republicans-hold-onto-congress.html?ref=reapportionment&amp;pagewanted=all">years-long strategy of winning state houses</a> in order to control each state's once-a-decade redistricting process. (Confused about redistricting? Check out our <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/video-the-redistricting-song">song</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How abusers get away with targeting Indian women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charon Asetoyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native American women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House has delayed the Violence Against Women Act over a provision that would protect Native American women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"We have serial rapists on the reservation -- that are non-Indian -- because they know they can get away with it," said Charon Asetoyer, executive director of the Native American Women's Health Education Resource Center in Lake Andes, S.D. "Many of these cases just get dropped. Nothing happens. And they know they're free to hurt again."</p><p>Asetoyer was talking about the loophole that prevents tribal authorities, who have jurisdiction over crimes committed on Indian territory by Indians, from having any authority over non-Indian male abusers. That's despite the fact that non-Indian men account for an<a href="http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-47-Add1_en.pdf"> estimated 80 percent</a> of rapes of Indian women, and that the astronomical rate of abuse of Indian women is well documented by the federal government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative activists to GOP lawmakers: You are being tested</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morton Blackwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedState]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of right-wing movers and shakers sent a letter urging Republicans to stand up to the "liberal apparatus"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">A group of big right-wing activists wrote an open letter to House and Senate Republicans, telling them they are "entering into a period of testing," wherein their conservative principles will be challenged and "the whole leftist apparatus is gearing up to panic you and to force you to cave in. Don’t do it."</p><p style="text-align: left;" align="center">The letter, posted by conservative columnist Morton Blackwell on <a href="http://www.redstate.com/morton_c_blackwell/2012/11/30/an-open-letter-to-u-s-house-and-senate-republicans/">RedState.com</a>, urges lawmakers to be strong against the liberals' "current power grabs."</p><p>"If Republicans cave in now, when it really counts, next time you will be weaker, because your conservative base will be outraged," the letter says. "Many who worked hard to elect you in the past will never lift a finger for you again."</p><p>The letter concludes:</p><blockquote><p>So it’s in the interest of the country and in your personal interest for you to use the power you unquestionably have now to stand firm and not surrender your conservative principles, no matter how loud the clamor of people whose central interest is to advance the left’s agenda.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/conservative_activists_to_gop_lawmakers_you_are_being_tested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Numbers not on GOP&#8217;s side</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_gops_bad_fiscal_cliff_hand_by_the_numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_gops_bad_fiscal_cliff_hand_by_the_numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans have been dealt a tough hand on the "fiscal cliff." Here's why they should throw in their cards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With no compromise in sight on fiscal cliff negotiations, the White House said in no uncertain terms yesterday that <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/05/geithner-white-house-absolutely-ready-to-go-over-fiscal-cliff/">they are prepared and willing</a> to go over the metaphorical cliff if Republicans refuse to allow the Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans to expire. Politically, that's a more appealing option for Democrats than Republicans, who have been boxed in. On one side, they have an emboldened president's insistence that tax rates must go up, but on the other side they have their vows to the base, via Grover Norquist's pledge, not to raise rates. Something's got to to give.</p><p>Without a doubt, Republicans have been dealt the weaker hand here, as a look at poll numbers from the past few weeks demonstrates. "[We're in] a terrible position because by default the Democrats get what they want," Oklahoma Republican Rep. James Langford <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/12/05/166546006/taxes-are-a-stumbling-block-to-fiscal-cliff-talks">told</a> NPR. And if there were ever a time in John Boehner's tenure as House speaker to concede big, now is it. Rank-and-file members seem to have recognized the bind they're in and are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/us/politics/boehner-gains-strong-backing-of-house-gop.html?hp">ready to back Boehner</a>, even if he cuts a deal they're not thrilled with. Here's the story, in numbers:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_gops_bad_fiscal_cliff_hand_by_the_numbers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_gops_bad_fiscal_cliff_hand_by_the_numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP leaders remove four from plum House committees</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/gop_leaders_remove_4_from_plum_house_committees_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/gop_leaders_remove_4_from_plum_house_committees_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Huelskamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Boehner sacked four conservative Republicans for bucking party leaders on key votes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — House Speaker John Boehner's decision to take plum committee assignments away from four conservative Republican lawmakers after they bucked party leaders on key votes isn't going over well with conservative advocacy groups that viewed them as role models.</p><p>Reps. Tim Huelskamp of Kansas and Justin Amash of Michigan will lose their seats on the House Budget Committee chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan next year. And Reps. Walter Jones of North Carolina and David Schweikert of Arizona are losing their seats on the House Financial Services Committee.</p><p>The move is underscoring a divide in the Republican Party between tea party-supported conservatives and the House GOP leadership.</p><p>"This is a clear attempt on the part of Republican leadership to punish those in Washington who vote the way they promised their constituents they would — on principle — instead of mindlessly rubber-stamping trillion dollar deficits and the bankrupting of America," said Matt Kibbe, president of the tea party group FreedomWorks. "This is establishment thinking, circling the wagons around yes-men and punishing anyone that dares to take a stand for good public policy."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/gop_leaders_remove_4_from_plum_house_committees_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/gop_leaders_remove_4_from_plum_house_committees_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the new Peter King</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Peter King is stepping down as chair of the Homeland Security Committee -- will his replacement be any better?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for people who are uneasy with New York Republican Rep. Peter King’s leadership of the House Homeland Security Committee: He’s stepping down thanks to term limits. But there's some potential bad news: His replacement may not be a whole lot better.</p><p>Texas Republican Rep. Mike McCaul edged out Michigan Rep. Candice Miller -- who was the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/84293.html">GOP’s best hope</a> of getting a female major committee head -- and Mike Rodgers in a close private <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2012/11/michael-mccaul-of-texas-tapped-to-replace-nys-peter-king-as-house-homeland-sec">vote</a> this week. King’s tenure as chairman drew controversy for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/congresss_worst_islamophobe/">series of hearings</a> he held on the radicalization of Muslims in America. Critics didn’t discount the threat of homegrown terror but said King should have expanded the hearings to include all kinds of violent radicalism, including right-wing extremism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.securefreedomradio.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/02222011_Seg3_McCaul_11min13.mp3" length="2695628" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP addresses its &#8220;only white male committee chairs&#8221; problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_gop_addresses_its_only_white_male_committee_chairs_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_gop_addresses_its_only_white_male_committee_chairs_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Administration Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candice Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans currently have one female committee chair -- and she's stepping down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans responded to criticism that they were only appointing white, male committee chairs by bringing a woman into the mix: Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., who will head the House Administrations Committee.</p><p>Earlier this week, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/84293.html">various</a> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/house-committee-chairs-all-white-men_n_2201136.html">news</a> <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-29/u-s-house-republicans-back-all-male-committee-chairmen.html">outlets</a> pointed out that Republicans had tapped 19 white men to head up the committees in the next session. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., is currently the only female Republican committee chair, and she'll be stepping down from her post.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/wp/2012/11/30/house-republicans-will-have-one-woman-committee-chair/">Washington Post</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_gop_addresses_its_only_white_male_committee_chairs_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_gop_addresses_its_only_white_male_committee_chairs_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House to vote on increasing advanced-degree visas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_to_vote_on_increasing_advanced_degree_visas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_to_vote_on_increasing_advanced_degree_visas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dream Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_to_vote_on_increasing_advanced_degree_visas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill would offer permanent residency to foreign students earning certain advanced degrees]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A House vote to offer permanent residency to foreign students earning certain advanced degrees is setting the stage for a bigger battle next year on how to redesign the nation's flawed immigration system.</p><p>House Republicans, with the help of a minority of Democrats, are expected to prevail in passing the bill, which would provide up to 55,000 green cards a year to foreign students graduating from U.S. colleges and universities with masters and doctoral degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.</p><p>But the bill is unlikely to go anywhere this year in the Senate, and the White House opposes it. Democrats say it offsets the increase in visas for highly educated foreigners by ending a program allotting visas for Africa and other areas with low immigration rates.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517552418'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_to_vote_on_increasing_advanced_degree_visas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/house_to_vote_on_increasing_advanced_degree_visas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last House race brings 2012 election to an end</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/last_house_race_brings_2012_election_to_an_end_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/last_house_race_brings_2012_election_to_an_end_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McIntyre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Carolina Rep. Mike McIntyre, a Democrat, barely survives a challenge for his House seat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The last undecided House race has been called for the incumbent Democrat, bringing an unofficial close to the 2012 campaign more than three weeks after Election Day.</p><p>North Carolina Rep. Mike McIntyre will return to Congress in 2013 after barely surviving a challenge from David Rouzer. The Republican conceded to McIntyre on Wednesday night after a recount showed the Democrat maintaining a small lead.</p><p>With McIntyre's race decided, only two House seats in next year's Congress remain up for grabs. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., an Illinois Democrat, won re-election but resigned last week, citing ongoing health issues and acknowledging he's the subject of a federal investigation. Special primary elections to nominate candidates to replace him will be held in February.</p><p>And in Louisiana, which held its primary election for Congress on Nov. 6, there will be a run-off between two Republicans next month for the other seat.</p><p>House Republicans will stay in the majority, although their ranks will drop from 240 this Congress to 234 next year. Two hundred Democratic members will make up the minority in the House, up from 190 Democrats this year. There are currently five vacancies in the House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/last_house_race_brings_2012_election_to_an_end_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/last_house_race_brings_2012_election_to_an_end_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Congress: Fewer moderates make deals harder</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/new_congress_fewer_moderates_make_deals_harder_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/new_congress_fewer_moderates_make_deals_harder_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/new_congress_fewer_moderates_make_deals_harder_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of centrist lawmakers have retired or lost their reelection races]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — When the next Congress cranks up in January, there will be more women, many new faces and 11 fewer tea party-backed House Republicans from the class of 2010 who sought a second term.</p><p>Overriding those changes, though, is a thinning of pragmatic, centrist veterans in both parties. Among those leaving are some of the Senate's most pragmatic lawmakers, nearly half the House's centrist Blue Dog Democrats and several moderate House Republicans.</p><p>That could leave the parties more polarized even as President Barack Obama and congressional leaders talk up the cooperation needed to tackle complex, vexing problems such as curbing deficits, revamping tax laws and culling savings from Medicare and other costly, popular programs.</p><p>"This movement away from the center, at a time when issues have to be resolved from the middle, makes it much more difficult to find solutions to major problems," said William Hoagland, senior vice president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a private group advocating compromise.</p><p>In the Senate, moderate Scott Brown, R-Mass., lost to Democrat Elizabeth Warren, who will be one of the most liberal members. Another GOP moderate, Richard Lugar of Indiana, fell in the primary election. Two others, Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas and Olympia Snowe of Maine, are retiring.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/new_congress_fewer_moderates_make_deals_harder_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/new_congress_fewer_moderates_make_deals_harder_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allen West finally gives up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/allen_west_finally_gives_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/allen_west_finally_gives_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party lawmaker concedes to Democrat Patrick Murphy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Tea Party icon has fallen, but he did not go down easy.</p><p>Rep. Allen West, the Florida Republican best known for his impressive innovations in congressional crazy, has finally conceded to his Democratic challenger, Patrick Murphy, two weeks after Election Day. When early results showed him narrowly behind Murphy, West demanded a recount, alleging a conspiracy to steal the election from him. He had no legal right to a recount under state law -- Murphy's lead was outside the percent margin stipulated by Florida election law -- but a recount went ahead anyway. Unfortunately for West, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/allen_wests_recount_backfires/">the recount only put the Tea Partyer further behind</a> Murphy.</p><p>And so, finally this: "While many questions remain unanswered, today I am announcing that I will take no further action to contest the outcome of this election," West <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/84068.html#ixzz2ClWJzvNe  ">said in a statement to Politico</a>. “I pray he will serve his constituents with honor and integrity, and put the interests of our nation before his own," West added of Murphy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/allen_west_finally_gives_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/allen_west_finally_gives_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals need Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/why_its_good_that_pelosi_is_staying_put/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/why_its_good_that_pelosi_is_staying_put/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13073166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the fiscal cliff looming, they should be thankful that Pelosi stayed on as Democratic leader]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi announced she’s staying on in her current role as minority leader after months of speculation that she would step down if Democrats didn’t win a majority in last week’s election.  Indeed, her decision to run for the leadership spot in 2010 after Democrats lost the House was a highly unusual one, and predicated on the possibility of reclaiming the gavel in 2012. That obviously didn’t happen, and Pelosi may never be speaker again, but it’s probably a very good thing for progressives that she decided to stay on at a time when Democrats may face deep divisions over what do about the so-called fiscal cliff. (Technically, Pelosi has to win an election for the spot, but she's expected to win overwhelmingly.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/why_its_good_that_pelosi_is_staying_put/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/why_its_good_that_pelosi_is_staying_put/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi to stay on as House Dems&#8217; leader</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/pelosi_to_stay_on_as_house_dems_leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/pelosi_to_stay_on_as_house_dems_leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement came after widespread speculation that she'd leave the post]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — A congressional official said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi told her party caucus Wednesday that she will remain as minority leader in the new session of Congress.</p><p>This official said the 72-year-old Pelosi made the decision to remain at the helm of the party’s House leadership even though Democrats failed to win the necessary 25 additional seats to become the majority party again.</p><p>The official, who is close to Pelosi, revealed her decision on condition of anonymity because she hadn’t yet publicly announced it.</p><div id="AdMiddle"><iframe id="i_middle" name="i_middle" src="http://www.bostonherald.com/includes/processAds.bg?position=Middle&amp;companion=Top,Right,Middle,Bottom&amp;page=bh.heraldinteractive.com%2Fnews%2Fus_politics%2Farticle" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="300" height="250"></iframe></div><p>Pelosi’s quarter-century of service in Congress representing a San Francisco area district in the House includes becoming the first woman in history to serve as speaker. The tea party-fueled political wave of 2010 forced the gavel from her hand to Rep. John Boehner, an Ohio Republican.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/pelosi_to_stay_on_as_house_dems_leader/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/pelosi_to_stay_on_as_house_dems_leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darwin outperforms on ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/darwin_outperforms_on_ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/darwin_outperforms_on_ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Broun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Georgia voters protested an anti-science incumbent by writing-in the father of evolution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul C. Broun, R-Ga., will keep his House seat for another term, but thousands in his district registered their dissent at the polls. The five-term incumbent, who holds an M.D. degree but has called evolution and the Big Bang Theory "<a title="Talking Points Memo" href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/rep-paul-broun-r-ga-evolution-big-bang-lies-straight-from-the-pit-of-hell.php" target="_blank">lies straight from the pit of hell</a>," ran unopposed.</p><p>In protest, 4,000 voters in Athens-Clarke County wrote in the name of English naturalist Charles Darwin, making the pro-science opposition account for nearly one-fifth of all <a title="Anthens-Clarke County" href="http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/government/elections/2012-11-08/charles-darwin-gets-4000-write-votes-paul-broun-race" target="_blank">ballots registered</a> in the county. Broun, who also believes that the earth is 9,000 years old, currently serves on the House Science Committee (alongside Rep. Todd Akin).</p><p>With mounting opposition brewing in his district, many anticipate someone will step up to challenge Broun in 2014. But -- as witty as the Darwin protest vote was -- perhaps they can choose someone living next time?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/darwin_outperforms_on_ballot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/darwin_outperforms_on_ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-choice, pro-gun, you name it. Eight Democrats who want -- but don't deserve -- your vote tomorrow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This hasn't been a great year for progressive causes. Whether you're a woman, an immigrant, an environmentalist or a person who doesn't want to be killed by a gun (the list goes on), the 112th Congress was pretty much a disaster.</p><p>And while it's extremists like Richard Mourdock, Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who received progressives’ derision for saying (and voting for) completely off-the-wall stuff, plenty of Democrats got in on the rape-denying, gun-loving, science-hating action, too. While these Blue Dogs might not want to repeal health care reform (well, except when they <a href="http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/57769/larry-kissell">do</a>), their records should still give you pause. Here are eight conservative Democrats who are hurting their party <em>and</em> their country -- but still want your vote.</p><p>[slide_show id=13063497]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton Delivers Key Endorsements In California</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clinton_delivers_key_endorsements_in_california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clinton_delivers_key_endorsements_in_california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Clinton stumped for Democrats running for House seats in California]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former President Bill Clinton talked about student loans in a campaign stop at U.C. Irvine to endorse a number of Democrats running for the House of Representatives in Califonia, <a href="http://www.neontommy.com/news/2012/10/bill-clinton-gives-california-democratic-congressional-candidates-some-love">including</a> Scott Peters, Raul Ruiz, Julia Brownley, Mark Takano and Alan Lowenthal.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517515706'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clinton_delivers_key_endorsements_in_california/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clinton_delivers_key_endorsements_in_california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>