<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > U.S. Military</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/us_military/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What you should know about developing Syria situation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conventional wisdom is over-hyping recent events, and gets U.S. strategy wrong. Here's what's really happening]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thursday’s announcement by the White House that it would begin supplying Syria’s rebels with small arms and ammunition represents a modest shift in tactics and by itself doesn’t represent a major strategic shift in U.S. policy on Syria, contrary to the conventional wisdom.</p><p>The initial commentaries sparked by this public statement demonstrated a major shortcoming in our discussion on Syria for months – a heavy fixation on tactics or means to achieve objectives, without much reference to the overall strategy with all of its components. At times it seems as if a “no strategy” zone has been imposed on the U.S. policy debate on Syria.</p><p>The Obama administration’s overall cautious strategy on Syria – and yes, it does have a strategy – remains largely intact and unchanged in the broad contours. The key question isn’t whether the administration has a strategy. Instead, the most important questions are whether the administration’s Syria strategy is effective in advancing U.S. security interests and values -- and whether the full range of means the United States is willing to invest in will produce the outcomes it hopes to achieve.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSA has a propaganda center to make it seem fun!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/meet_the_nsas_propaganda_center/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/meet_the_nsas_propaganda_center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Museums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merchandise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13323704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a lot you'll never know about the ultrasecret spy agency, but you can buy a coffee mug]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You, as an average American without security clearance, cannot know the National Security Agency's budget (it's <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/07/news/economy/nsa-surveillance-cost/index.html">classified</a>), or how many people it employs (also classified -- some guessitmate by counting parking spaces), let alone really understand why it needs <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/print-edition/2011/02/04/contractors-take-note-nsa-needs-help.html?page=all">its own power plant</a> and enough data storage for <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/">500 quintillion</a> pages of text. You can, however, visit the agency's gift shop and buy a coffee mug.</p><p>I did Tuesday afternoon on a visit to the only part of the clandestine agency that most people will ever be able to access, the <a href="http://www.nsa.gov/about/cryptologic_heritage/museum/">National Cryptologic Museum</a>. The museum is perhaps the largest bone an agency so secret that it's sometimes wryly referred to as "No Such Agency" throws towards public outreach, and it's not very big one. Sequestered in a squat concrete outbuilding behind the gas station in a corner of the NSA's Ft. Mead, Maryland campus, the museum feels a bit like a regional historical society that happened to stumble across a cache of some of (what was a the time) the world's most cutting-edge military communications and cryptology gear.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/meet_the_nsas_propaganda_center/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/meet_the_nsas_propaganda_center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Answer to military&#8217;s sexual assault problem may be overseas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/answer_to_militarys_sexual_assault_problem_may_be_overseas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/answer_to_militarys_sexual_assault_problem_may_be_overseas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We followed our allies before lifting "don't ask, don't tell." Now, America's allies may lead us to reform again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to Washington's questions about how the military can better respond to sexual assault may lie in Ottawa and Jerusalem and the other capitals of key U.S. allies, which have already done what some lawmakers here want to do -- remove the sexual assault reporting system from the chain of command.</p><p>Right now, it's up to a suspect's commander whether or not to press charges for sexual assault or any other crime. Military prosecutors advise commanders, but don't have the final say. And if a court-martial finds the suspect guilty, the commander has the power to overturn that decision, as Air Force Lt. Gen. Craig Franklin <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/12/sexual-assault-military-general-craig-franklin">did last year</a> after a lieutenant colonel under his command at a U.S. base in Italy was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to a year in prison.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/answer_to_militarys_sexual_assault_problem_may_be_overseas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/answer_to_militarys_sexual_assault_problem_may_be_overseas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 ways Congress is trying to curb rape in the military</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/5_ways_congress_is_trying_to_curb_rape_in_the_military_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/5_ways_congress_is_trying_to_curb_rape_in_the_military_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Helms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Closely scrutinizing officers appointed to prevent sexual assault is just one of the measures under consideration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a> When the Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on the U.S. military’s sexual assault crisis, lawmakers grilled Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine officials on the alarmingly high number of rapes and other sexual abuses in their ranks.</p><p>Political momentum to address the problem has been building since the Pentagon <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/us/politics/pentagon-study-sees-sharp-rise-in-sexual-assaults.html?pagewanted=all">released statistics</a> last month showing that sexual assault increased by 35 percent between 2010 and 2012. The outcry grew louder when a string of scandals came to light, including alleged sexual assaults by Army and Air Force officials who were in charge of preventing sexual abuse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/5_ways_congress_is_trying_to_curb_rape_in_the_military_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/5_ways_congress_is_trying_to_curb_rape_in_the_military_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>General deals major blow to military&#8217;s superiority myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/general_deals_major_blow_to_militarys_superiority_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/general_deals_major_blow_to_militarys_superiority_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorial Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gen. Stanley McChrystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Militarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriotism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America honors soldiers -- but often bashes other public servants. Now, a general questions that double standard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As scrutiny is finally applied to how the military <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/joint_chiefs%E2%80%99_responses_during_sexual_assault_hearing_stunningly_bad_says_senator/">handles sexual assault</a>, it's worth considering our culture of military worship more broadly. One of the great taboos in 21st century America is to in any way equate military service with any other kind of service. Anything martial is expected to be held up as innately better and more important than everything else.</p><p>This, of course, is the true definition of the theology of militarism - a worship of all things martial. It is America's civic religion and explains much. For example, it explains why we have a Memorial Day that remembers those in the military who lost their lives but still <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/memorial_day_should_include_police_firefighters_and_teachers/">excludes</a> those other civilian public servants who also lost their lives while on the job. It also explains why we have a political culture of Military Exceptionalism - that is, a culture that deems it perfectly acceptable to slander civilian public employees but almost never acceptable to criticize the public employees who comprise the armed forces.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/general_deals_major_blow_to_militarys_superiority_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/general_deals_major_blow_to_militarys_superiority_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military: Sexual assault is &#8220;like a cancer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/military_sexual_assault_is_like_a_cancer_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/military_sexual_assault_is_like_a_cancer_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed Services Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the admission, officials have rejected congressional efforts to revamp the military justice system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Military leaders said Tuesday that sexual assault in the ranks is "like a cancer" that could destroy the force, but they rejected far-reaching congressional efforts to strip commanders of some authority in meting out justice.</p><p>Seated side-by-side at a long witness table, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the head of each branch of the military testified on what is widely viewed as an epidemic of sexual assault plaguing the services.</p><p>Outraged by recent high-profile cases and overwhelming statistics, lawmakers have moved aggressively on legislation to address the scourge of sexual assault. They summoned the military brass to answer their questions at a jam-packed hearing.</p><p>Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said the problem of sexual assault "is of such a scope and magnitude that it has become a stain on our military."</p><p>Congress has acted in prior years to ensure the aggressive investigation and prosecution of sexual assaults, Levin said, but more needs to be done. The committee is considering seven bills to deal with sexual assault.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/military_sexual_assault_is_like_a_cancer_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/military_sexual_assault_is_like_a_cancer_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fort Hood shooting suspect to represent himself at trial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/fort_hood_shooting_suspect_to_represent_himself_at_trial_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/fort_hood_shooting_suspect_to_represent_himself_at_trial_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nidal Hassan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Major Nidal Hassan's attorneys will remain on the case, but only if he asks for their help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A military judge will allow the US army psychiatrist charged in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage to represent himself at his upcoming murder trial.</p><p>The judge also ruled Monday that Major Nidal Hasan's attorneys will remain on the case, but only if he asks for their help.</p><p>The judge, Colonel Tara Osborn, said last week that a report indicates Hasan is mentally competent to represent himself.</p><p>A doctor testified Monday that Hasan's paralysis won't have a significant impact during proceedings. He's paralyzed from the waist down after being shot by police the day of the attack on the <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on Texas" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/texas">Texas</a> army post.</p><p>Jury selection is set to start Wednesday.</p><p>Hasan faces the death penalty or life in prison without parole if convicted in the attack that killed 13.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/fort_hood_shooting_suspect_to_represent_himself_at_trial_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/fort_hood_shooting_suspect_to_represent_himself_at_trial_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese hackers accessed U.S. weapons designs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/chinese_hackers_accessed_u_s_weapons_designs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/chinese_hackers_accessed_u_s_weapons_designs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit 61398]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberattacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13310706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than two dozen major U.S. weapons systems have been reportedly compromised]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolstering concerns that the Chinese military are hacking U.S. systems to steal corporate and government secrets, a report Monday suggested that Chinese hackers have accessed U.S. weapons designs. A report prepared for the Defense Department claimed that hackers accessed blueprints for combat aircraft and ships, as well as vital missile defenses. Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed claims that<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/chinese_army_unit_tied_to_hacks_on_u_s/"> a military united based on the outskirts of Shanghai</a> is responsible for a spate of cyberattacks on the U.S. in recent months, including against news publications like the AP and the New York Times. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/27/chinese-hackers-weapons-designs_n_3344222.html">Reuters reported </a>on the latest weapons system hacks:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/chinese_hackers_accessed_u_s_weapons_designs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/chinese_hackers_accessed_u_s_weapons_designs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorial Day should also honor fallen police, firefighters and teachers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/memorial_day_should_include_police_firefighters_and_teachers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/memorial_day_should_include_police_firefighters_and_teachers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorial Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holidays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First responders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbecue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13309833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many ways to serve your country. Holiday should also include first responders, and others who died for us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the grandson of a veteran, and so among other things, Memorial Day brings up early childhood memories of my dad's dad telling me about his public service in the military. While he gave me kid-friendly versions of his recollections, I was just old enough to vaguely understand his allusions to the injuries, casualties, lost friends and the trauma he likely experienced while serving overseas in World War II. Those allusions to the downsides of war - downsides that are too often glossed over in our sanitized recollections of World War II - gradually informed the way I came to see Memorial Day as a sacred moment to honor those who lost their lives in service to America.</p><p>In recent years, though, I have found our national celebration of Memorial Day lacking because while I am indeed the grandson of a soldier, I am also the son, son-in-law, nephew and friend of many other kinds of public servants. Through their civilian work, I have come to understand public service as something much more than only military service. Trouble is, while there may be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_Officers_Memorial_Day">a</a> <a href="http://weekend.firehero.org">few</a> lower profile days meant to honor their service, these public servants are not included as part of the high-profile Memorial Day - even though they should be.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/memorial_day_should_include_police_firefighters_and_teachers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/memorial_day_should_include_police_firefighters_and_teachers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A progressive defense of drones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a liberal I was against drones reflexively. But the moral debate is more complicated than I'd realized]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Thursday’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/for_obama_a_new_plan_to_fight_terror/">speech</a> before the National Defense University, President Obama reflected on the concerns about “morality and accountability” raised by drone strikes. Emphasizing the importance of “clear guidelines” and intelligence gathering to properly “constrain” the use of drones, the president also maintained a firm stance on their necessity: Even though drone strikes sometimes result in civilian casualties, in many circumstances they remain the most effective option for realizing specific military objectives.</p><p>As a liberal, I’m against drones essentially by reflex. At least, I used to be. Recently, I’ve begun to reconsider that view; and I’m no longer sure where I come down on the morality of drone strikes. Disturbing as I find state-sponsored violence, when drones do the killing instead of soldiers, it seems apparent that we have an easier time recognizing the violence as horrific. War, in its traditional form, distorts our moral reasoning. Drones do not. And as much it grates against my broader political commitments to say so, this is plainly a <em>benefit</em> of drone warfare, other shortcomings notwithstanding.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands treated for sexual abuse-related injuries in military</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2012 alone, as many as 4,000 veterans sought disability benefits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 85,000 veterans were treated last year for injuries or illness stemming from sexual abuse in the military, and 4,000 sought disability benefits, underscoring the staggering long-term impact of a crisis that has roiled the Pentagon and been condemned by President Barack Obama as "''shameful and disgraceful."</p><p>A Department of Veterans Affairs accounting released in response to inquiries from The Associated Press shows a heavy financial and emotional cost involving vets from Iraq, Afghanistan and even back to Vietnam, and lasting long after a victim leaves the service.</p><p>Sexual assault or repeated sexual harassment can trigger a variety of health problems, primarily post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. While women are more likely to be victims, men made up nearly 40 percent of the patients the VA treated last year for conditions connected to what it calls "military sexual trauma."</p><p>It took years for Ruth Moore of Milbridge, Maine, to begin getting treatment from a VA counseling center in 2003 — 16 years after she was raped twice while she was stationed in Europe with the Navy. She continues to get counseling at least monthly for PTSD linked to the attacks and is also considered fully disabled.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama pledges to end &#8220;scourge&#8221; of sexual assault in the military</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/obama_pledges_to_end_scourge_of_sexual_assault_in_the_military_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/obama_pledges_to_end_scourge_of_sexual_assault_in_the_military_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Dempsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Odierno]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senior military officers are speaking about the problem with increasing bluntness and expressions of regret]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is pledging to eliminate the "scourge" of sexual assault in the military while cautioning that it will take a long and sustained effort by all military members.</p><p>"There is no silver bullet to solving this problem," Obama said Thursday after meeting with Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and the top brass from all the military services.</p><p>"We will not stop until we've seen this scourge, from what is the greatest military in the world, eliminated," he told reporters.</p><p>Senior military officers are speaking about the problem with increasing bluntness and expressions of regret. Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on Wednesday called it a "crisis" in the ranks, and on Thursday the Army chief of staff, Gen. Ray Odierno, publicly acknowledged his service's efforts are "failing."</p><p>"They care about this and they are angry about it," Obama said.</p><p>"Not only is it a crime, not only is it shameful and disgraceful, but it also is going to make and has made the military less effective than it can be," the president said.</p><p>Those summoned to the White House by Obama included not just Hagel, Dempsey and the chiefs of each military service but also the civilian heads of each service and senior enlisted advisers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/obama_pledges_to_end_scourge_of_sexual_assault_in_the_military_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/obama_pledges_to_end_scourge_of_sexual_assault_in_the_military_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon officials: Drone War on Terror is endless</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aumf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Congressional hearing, Defense officials defend AUMF and the boundless war-waging powers it grants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a Congressional hearing Thursday on drone strikes carried out by the military, senior defense official Michael Sheehan admitted that the War on Terror is one without end or boundary. The assistant defense secretary told the Senate Armed Services Committee that U.S. military operations against al-Qaida and associated forces "is going to go on for quite a while... beyond the second term of the president. . . . I think it’s at least 10 to 20 years.”</p><p>Sheehan's remarks served as a defense of the military's current drone strike policy. While the majority of U.S. drone strikes are carried out by the CIA and authorized by the president directly, the Pentagon oversees strikes in Pakistan and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/cia_may_lose_drone_program/">will take increasing control of U.S. drone programs</a>. Sheehan also defended the current structure of the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Act (AUMF), passed after 9/11, which, in its present iteration, grants the president wide-ranging powers to wage drone wars. “At this point we’re comfortable with the AUMF as it is currently structured,” said Sheehan. He admitted that there was no expiration date or geographic boundary to the War on Terror.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/pentagon_official_drone_policy_should_remain_for_at_least_20_years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military&#8217;s rape problem hits tipping point for reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/can_the_militarys_rape_problem_finally_be_addressed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/can_the_militarys_rape_problem_finally_be_addressed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["The Invisible War"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire McCaskill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine getting raped and having no one to report it to but your boss. It's a fight -- but change may be on the way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s an idea that the military has long opposed: Taking the response to sexual assault charges out of its chain of command and handing it to an independent judicial authority instead. In other words, no longer forcing people to report sexual violence to their often-indifferent or uninformed boss -- and maybe the perpetrator's too.</p><p>Last week, that opposition went right to the top, when Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said, “It is my strong belief — and I think others on Capitol Hill and within our institution — the ultimate authority has to remain within the command structure.” He was saying that, of course, while unveiling an annual report showing the number of sexual assaults within the Army had actually gone up in the past year. But on Monday the Pentagon press secretary backed away somewhat, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/299291-hagel-open-to-all-options-on-sexual-assault">saying</a> the secretary was “open to all options.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/can_the_militarys_rape_problem_finally_be_addressed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/can_the_militarys_rape_problem_finally_be_addressed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army sexual assault watchdog accused of &#8220;abusive sexual contact&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/army_sexual_assault_prevention_officer_accused_of_abusive_sexual_contact_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/army_sexual_assault_prevention_officer_accused_of_abusive_sexual_contact_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sergeant first class has been fingered for pandering, assault and maltreatment of subordinates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — A soldier assigned to coordinate a sexual assault prevention program in Texas is under investigation for "abusive sexual contact" and other alleged misconduct and has been suspended from his duties, the Army announced Tuesday.</p><p>Just last week an Air Force officer who headed a sexual assault prevention office was himself arrested on charges of groping a woman in a parking lot.</p><p>The Army said a sergeant first class, whose name was not released, is accused of pandering, abusive sexual contact, assault and maltreatment of subordinates. He is being investigated by the Army Criminal Investigation Command. No charges have been filed.</p><p>He had been assigned as an equal opportunity adviser and coordinator of a sexual harassment-assault prevention program at the Army's 3rd Corps headquarters at Fort Hood, Texas, when the allegation arose, the Army said.</p><p>"To protect the integrity of the investigative process and the rights of all persons involved, no more information will be released at this time," an Army statement said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/army_sexual_assault_prevention_officer_accused_of_abusive_sexual_contact_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/army_sexual_assault_prevention_officer_accused_of_abusive_sexual_contact_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was ending the draft a mistake?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Militarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without conscription war has become an abstraction, enabling a new "era of persistent conflict"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few probably recall the name Dwight Elliott Stone. But even if his name has faded from the national memory, the man remains historically significant. That's because on June 30, 1973, the 24-year-old plumber's apprentice became the last American forced into the armed services before the military draft expired.</p><p>Though next month's 40-year anniversary of the end of conscription will likely be as forgotten as Stone, it shouldn't be. In operations across the globe, the all-volunteer military has been employed by policymakers to birth what Gen. George Casey recently called the "era of persistent conflict." Four decades later, we therefore have an obligation to ask: How much of the public's complicity in that epochal shift is a result of the end of the draft?</p><p>There is, of course, no definitive answer to such a complex question. However, a look back at some lost history shows that today's public acquiescence to militarism was exactly what the government wanted when it ended the draft.</p><p>That loaded term -- "militarism" -- was, in fact, a prominent part of the 1970 report by President Nixon's Commission on an All-Volunteer Force. In its findings, the panel worried about "a cycle of anti-militarism" in a nation then questioning America's increasingly martial posture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>148</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After &#8220;withdrawal&#8221; U.S. will keep 9 Afghan bases</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troop withdrawal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamid Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The continuing presence -- agreed to by President Karzai -- is larger than expected ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of military withdrawal -- especially from Afghanistan -- has long been a flimsy one. Let alone the presence of contractors that are not counted among official troop numbers, withdrawal from Afghanistan has never meant that the country would be totally without a U.S. military presence. On Thursday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced that the U.S. hoped to maintain nine military bases across Afghanistan --  a large deployment that stands at odds with claims of a more robust security handover from U.S. to Afghan forces.</p><p>"We can agree to give them the bases – them staying on after 2014 is for the good of Afghanistan," Karzai said in a speech at Kabul University. "The condition is that they bring peace and security and take action quickly … on the basic strengthening of Afghanistan, helping the economy of Afghanistan."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with the military?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/whats_wrong_with_the_military_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/whats_wrong_with_the_military_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sexual assaults and nuclear weapons cast a long shadow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years of repeated reports of sexual assaults — and years of promises to prevent them, and then years of studies and commissions to find the best way of doing so — a Defense Department <a href="http://www.stripes.com/news/pentagon-s-annual-report-shows-sexual-assault-numbers-up-sharply-1.219952">study</a> released Tuesday estimates that some 26,000 people in the military were sexually assaulted in the last fiscal year, up from about 19,000 the year before.</p><p>Moreover, it turns out the Air Force lieutenant colonel in charge of preventing sexual assault has been arrested for  … sexual assault. According to the <a href="http://www.stripes.com/news/air-force-sex-assault-prevention-chief-charged-in-sex-assault-1.219860">police report</a>, a drunken Lt. Col. Jeff Krusinski allegedly approached a woman in a parking lot in Arlington, Va. Sunday night, and grabbed her breasts and buttocks.</p><p>Why has it been so difficult for the Air Force or the Defense Department to remedy this problem?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/whats_wrong_with_the_military_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/whats_wrong_with_the_military_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria: What&#8217;s really happening</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saddam Hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons of mass destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's what you need to know about the constantly evolving situation there, and the best of our no-good options]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1968, caught in the throes of the Vietnam War, a frustrated Lyndon Johnson quipped to Bill Moyers that he felt like a hitchhiker on a highway in a Texas hailstorm. “I can’t run, I can’t hide and I can’t make it stop.”</p><p>Syria isn’t Barack Obama’s Vietnam by a long shot. And I seriously doubt that Obama feels the same way Johnson did. But Johnson’s conundrum is in many ways Obama’s, too. In Syria, there are no good options, American credibility is at stake, and the pressures to act are considerable in the face of great uncertainties.</p><p>Doing nothing is unacceptable in the face of almost 80,000 dead and millions of Syrians displaced internally and abroad. Limited involvement – even on the military side -- will likely be ineffective, and getting stuck with the check through undertaking a massive military intervention is out of the question.</p><p>So what’s a guy to do? Sure, there are risks of acting; but there are consequences of not acting, too.</p><p>Indeed, in this regard, Syria is a moral tragedy and humanitarian disaster. It’s hemorrhaging refugees and radicalized jihadists. It’s a threat to regional stability and to Turkey, Jordan and Israel. It’s a potential proliferator of chemical weapons, a way to weaken Iran if only the Americans would recognize the opportunities; and it’s a threat to America’s credibility if Obama doesn’t act boldly in the face of self-declared “red lines.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain&#8217;s double standard on deference to the military</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/mccains_double_standard_on_deference_to_the_military/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/mccains_double_standard_on_deference_to_the_military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator demands the president listen to the military's advice -- but only when the Pentagon agrees with him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in late 2011, as Washington debated how quickly to end the Iraq War, John McCain slammed the White House for pulling out troops faster than some military leaders advised, saying he was "<a href="http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=40c66dfa-a5a0-fe0a-3ff7-ac3184038d50">deeply troubled</a>" by Obama's withdrawal plan. "We urge the administration to work urgently with Iraqi authorities to reach an agreement that reflects the best military advice of U.S. commanders on the ground,” he and two other hawkish senators said.</p><p>That's been McCain's line for years on big strategic questions about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan: defer to the military's advice and don't swerve. The military happened to agree with him then on the need to keep troops in those countries, but when it comes to Syria, where the Pentagon is at odds with McCain's gung-ho interventionism, McCain is suddenly uninterested in heeding the military's advice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/mccains_double_standard_on_deference_to_the_military/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/mccains_double_standard_on_deference_to_the_military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
