<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > U.S. Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/us_senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Where is the racial diversity in the senate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/where_is_the_racial_diversity_in_the_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/where_is_the_racial_diversity_in_the_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up with steve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deval Patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cory Booker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Up with Steve" panelists examine why there are so few African-Americas in the senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the departure of Mass. senator William Cowan, who was appointed to replace John Kerry as Secretary of State, the number of African-Americans in the U.S. Senate will be "slashed to half," says "Up with Steve" host Steve Kornacki, to just one person, Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC). "In all of modern history, there have only been six African-Americans to have served in the U.S. senate, and half of them weren't even elected -- they were appointed to their seats. Two others served back during Reconstruction, almost 150 years ago," said Kornacki.</p><p>MSNBC contributor Perry Bacon, Jr. explained on the show that "It's still really hard as an African-American politician to win in a big state":</p><blockquote><p>"We only have on black governor, Deval Patrick (D-Mass.). This is not an accident. It's really hard. A lot of members of CBC districts are pretty liberal, don't have big fundraising bases, so they have a hard time winning races, but it's really galling. And it also really matters in terms of policy as well. Think about the Voting Rights Act this week -- was struck down -- who in the senate is going to take that out? You watch the female senators handing sexual assault in the military? The female senators are really driving that because there are 20 of them and they can speak to the issues."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/where_is_the_racial_diversity_in_the_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/where_is_the_racial_diversity_in_the_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now the House will destroy immigration reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/now_the_house_will_destroy_immigration_reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/now_the_house_will_destroy_immigration_reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party.John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senators were very pleased with themselves yesterday for passing a major immigration bill that the House GOP hates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of the nation rejoiced yesterday when the United States Senate passed the comprehensive immigration bill a bipartisan group of senators have spent months crafting and selling, by the impressive margin of 68 to 32. For once, when writing about the Senate, the bigger number represents the senators who voted with the winning side. Even Marco Rubio, a "Gang of Eight" member who lately has been sounding shaky in his support of the final product, voted yea. (Rand Paul voted nay, because he <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00168">decided he couldn't support a "path to citizenship"</a> despite <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/03/rand-paul-backs-path-to-citizenship-just-dont-call-it-that.php">basically endorsing</a> the idea <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/rand_paul_endorses_immigrant_path_to_citizenship_2/">a few months ago.</a>)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/now_the_house_will_destroy_immigration_reform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/now_the_house_will_destroy_immigration_reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House of Representatives: Still terrible at everything</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House GOP's use of cheap tricks and a backup plan called "blaming Democrats" fails to avert farm bill humiliation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow or other, the U.S. government, for the first time in years, is close-ish to being functional. Don't read too heavily into that word "functional." The government is not and will not probably be moving on your pet issue any time soon, sorry. But the Senate is actually <em>moving,</em> on bipartisan pieces of legislation that are in the public spotlight: a farm bill, a comprehensive immigration bill. GOP senators who typically pretend to negotiate compromises and then run for the hills once they near a motion to proceed, like Lindsey Graham and Bob Corker, are suddenly seeing out those compromises. One of the two houses of Congress, in our lifetime, may well be nearing the minimum threshold for competence.</p><p>Now then, what's the problem? Oh right, it's the House of Representatives, which is terrible at everything, and offers no indication of being any other way until at least 2023. Let's give some credit: They're adept at passing go-nowhere bills to repeal Obamacare or ban abortion or tattoo the words "Under God" to every baby's forehead. Great work there from the House Republican Party. On issues that might appeal to an even slightly broader cross-section of the country, though, they've got nothing. You know this. You've seen the same routine in nearly every important vote since 2009. Remember that time the government considered arbitrarily defaulting on the public debt and destroying the global economy forever? That was a head-scratcher for the House; took some real "working out" before they concluded it would best be averted, <em>for now.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lunatic base ensures GOP will never reform immigration!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/lunatic_base_ensures_gop_will_never_reform_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/lunatic_base_ensures_gop_will_never_reform_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good news: The immigration bill may actually pass the Senate. The bad news: The GOP House is way crazier]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks at the Congressional Budget Office ran the "Gang of Eight's" immigration proposal through its adding machines and look at that: It's estimated to reduce the budget by one of those numbers that sounds big but is essentially trivial over 10 years ($197 billion). The other important finding, in CBO's words, is that “the net annual flow of unauthorized residents would decrease by about 25 percent relative to what would occur under current law.”</p><p>For the current coalition of mostly-Democratic-but-some-Republican backers as a whole, this is mixed news: The cost estimate checks out -- better than expected, even -- but the relatively small decrease in future illegal immigration raises some concerns about their claims that this will resolve the border issue conclusively, forever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/lunatic_base_ensures_gop_will_never_reform_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/lunatic_base_ensures_gop_will_never_reform_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Confidence in Congress at an all-time low</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/poll_confidence_in_congress_at_an_all_time_low/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/poll_confidence_in_congress_at_an_all_time_low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gallup finds that only 10 percent say they have faith in Congress, the lowest for any institution since 1973]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new Gallup poll finds that not only is confidence in Congress at an all-time low at a paltry 10 percent, but that number marks the worst rating for any institution since 1973.</p><p>This time around, the poll ranked 16 various institutions, and found that confidence in the military is highest, at 76 percent. The presidency was ranked fifth at 36 percent, and the Supreme Court came in seventh with 34 percent.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/163052/americans-confidence-congress-falls-lowest-record.aspx">Gallup</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Small business and the police also continue to rank highly, with 65% and 57% of Americans, respectively, expressing "a great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in these institutions. Joining Congress at the bottom of the list are Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and organized labor. Congress' low position is further underscored when one looks at the percentage of Americans who have little or no confidence in each institution. The slight majority of Americans, 52%, have this level of confidence in Congress, compared with 31% for HMOs.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/poll_confidence_in_congress_at_an_all_time_low/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/poll_confidence_in_congress_at_an_all_time_low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marco Rubio decides whether he wants to kill immigration reform or not</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the conservative Florida senator still want to be instrumental in passing reform?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate has just begun the weeks-long process of debating and voting on the immigration reform bill crafted by the "Gang of Eight." <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/06/10/its_zero_hour_for_senate_immigration_bill.html">Harry Reid would like the bill passed on July 4,</a> for the rather obvious symbolism. Supporters are still confident that the bill will pass the Senate.</p><p>The best thing the bill has going for it is that <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57588418/immigration-house-senate-looking-for-common-ground/">Mitch McConnell is going to actually allow it to come to the floor.</a> (Minority Leader McConnell has veto power over most Senate business, because many  senators have convinced themselves that the founders wanted him to.) The "Gang" has four Republican members, meaning only a few more are needed in order to reach 60 votes and beat a potential filibuster. Kelly Ayotte is one Republican who's publicly announced her support for the bill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul delusional about compromise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I am the conduit” for deal on immigration reform, he tells Fox News, while standing on the far-right fringe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again I ask: Is Sen. Rand Paul maybe not so bright? Last week he denounced new National Security Adviser Susan Rice for being "the person who is guilty of misleading us over the Benghazi tragedy." Since a trove of official emails documenting the creation of the Benghazi talking points proved that Rice had nothing to do with them, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/susan_rice_1_rand_paul_0/">I suggested Paul was either lying, or too dumb</a> to understand what the email revealed.</p><p>Now, on Fox News Sunday, he pompously declared “I am the conduit” for “compromise” on immigration reform, suggesting his ties to the far right in the House as well as mainstream Republicans in the Senate make him the man to broker a deal. Except Paul opposes any kind of specific pathway to citizenship for folks who are here illegally, which is a far-right staple that will make a deal impossible (<a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/rand-paul-i-am-conduit-save-immigration-refo">h/t Crooks and Liars</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie effectively appoints himself to the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/chris_christies_personal_senator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/chris_christies_personal_senator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Chiesa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor didn't choose to fill his state's open Senate seat -- but now he'll still control its votes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In appointing state Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa to fill the seat vacated by deceased Sen. Frank Lautenberg, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has come as close to appointing himself -- without actually doing so -- as possible. <span style="font-size: 13px;">Chiesa is a longtime loyalist and friend of the governor -- with little public profile or known ideological agenda --  following Christie from private practice, to the U.S. attorney's office, to the governor's mansion, making one wonder if his Senate office will effectively function as an extension of the governor's office in Washington.</span></p><p>The two first met in the late 1980s at the law firm of Dughi, Hewit &amp; Palatucci (Bill Palatucci being a big GOP fundraiser and Christie booster), where Christie had started a few years earlier. When Christie was nominated to be U.S. attorney for New Jersey in 2001, a newspaper cartoon showed him sitting across a table from President Bush, who was holding a copy of the future-governor's résumé that showed no experience as a criminal prosecutor. Chiesa framed the drawing and gave it to his friend, saying, "You and I both know how wrong this is. We'll laugh about this cartoon."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/chris_christies_personal_senator/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/chris_christies_personal_senator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear everyone: Chris Christie is conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: How many times do we have to explain this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Christie in <a href="http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/06/major_democratic_donors_flock.html">swimming in Democratic money</a> as he runs for reelection. His Democratic opponent, Barbara Buono, is ignored by the national press and the sort of people that would usually be writing checks for the Democratic challenger to a Republican governor in a large, liberal state.</p><p>Hugging Barack Obama was maybe the best political decision New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has ever made, and he's made some very canny ones. I'm not saying his embrace of the president following Hurricane Sandy was entirely cynical, but it was very boisterous, and it continued through last week, when Obama visited the Jersey Shore <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/obama_and_christie_are_still_friends_to_everyones_dismay/">and once again made nice with Christie before the national TV news cameras.</a></p><p>Here's what's odd about this Republican governor who currently seems much more popular with Democrats than national Republicans: He's quite conservative. Especially for the Northeast. That was, in fact, his original appeal, back when conservatives were thrilled about him: He's the most conservative possible successful statewide officeholder for a blue state like New Jersey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats fear blowing another Massachusetts Senate race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/democrats_fear_blowing_another_massachusetts_senate_race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/democrats_fear_blowing_another_massachusetts_senate_race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They still have PTSD from losing to Scott Brown. Now some worry the race to succeed John Kerry could bring déjà vu]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"To screw up a U.S. Senate special election isn’t a theory for us ... We’ve done it." That's what the Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman said to the state's largest newspaper with just a few weeks before the June 25 Senate special election to fill John Kerry's seat. In other words: Despite being one of the bluest states in the union, Democrats in Massachusetts are worried about Rep. Ed Markey's chances against Republican Gabriel Gomez later this month.</p><p>The aforementioned quote, from state Democratic Chairman John Walsh in <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/01/democrats-gear-aid-markey-senate-race/8AzRxrjMEc39e6Qp9RT0QL/story.html">Sunday's Boston Globe</a>, "shows you exactly what’s driving everybody in this race," Boston-based Democratic strategist Mary Anne Marsh told Salon. "They want to make sure that there’s not one thing that doesn’t get done -- an ad made, a door knocked, a resource afforded, an endorsement, an appearance, what have you -- to drum up enthusiasm for June 25. They're taking nothing for granted."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/democrats_fear_blowing_another_massachusetts_senate_race/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/democrats_fear_blowing_another_massachusetts_senate_race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz&#8217;s personality problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas senator is annoying, and doesn’t play well with others. Will that doom his White House ambitions?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Cruz has sharp elbows. He’s already managed to annoy several senators, including Republicans, and sparked what appears to be a full-on feud with Sen. John McCain. He also wants to be president of the United States.</p><p>Do those things go together? The political scientist John Sides <a href="http://themonkeycage.org/2013/05/22/why-ted-cruz-needs-to-trust-republicans/">thinks it’s going to be a problem</a>:</p><blockquote><p>[T]o be the Republican nominee, he’ll need the support of his Republican colleagues. The 2012 election once again showed—and despite some skepticism—that it is very hard to win the nomination unless you’re preferred by a substantial chunk, if not the vast majority of, your party’s leaders (as was Romney). Which is to say, it pays to be nice to your colleagues. It’s no guarantee, of course: junior Senator Hillary Clinton kept her head down and played nice, and lost the nomination. John McCain often irritated his fellow Republicans, but still mustered enough support within the party to win the nomination.</p></blockquote><p>But political scientist Dave Hopkins <a href="https://twitter.com/DaveAHopkins/status/337382079866220544">isn’t so sure</a>: “Don't think this is the problem for Cruz that John does. McCain bugged Sen colleagues/leaders too; still won '08 nom.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>240</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I secretly recorded Mitch McConnell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/why_i_secretly_recorded_mitch_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/why_i_secretly_recorded_mitch_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Yarmuth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Zinn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EXCLUSIVE: My effort to expose the Senate minority leader's ugly campaign upended my life. Here's what happened]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, I secretly made an audio recording of Sen. Mitch McConnell, the most powerful Republican on the planet, at his campaign headquarters in Kentucky. The released portion of the recording clocks in at less than 12 minutes, but those few minutes changed my life.</p><p>I leaked the recording to Mother Jones, which published it with a transcript and analysis in April, and over the days that followed, blogs and cable news shows lit up with the revelations from that one meeting. At the time, McConnell was prepping for a race against the actress Ashley Judd -- it was “the Whac-a-Mole stage of the campaign,” McConnell said smugly -- and the recording captures his team in some Grade-A jackassery, including plans to use Judd’s history of depression against her.</p><p>But also up for debate was the the ethics of the audio recording itself. Here's the latest: An assistant U.S. attorney, Bryan Calhoun, telephoned my attorney yesterday, asking to meet with him next Friday as charges against me are being presented to a grand jury.</p><p>In a technology age marked by vigilante heroes like Julian Assange and Anonymous, the line between journalism and espionage has grown thin. McConnell was quick to frame himself as the victim of a crime, which was to be expected. It was the guilty repositioning of a politician who has been caught being craven.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/why_i_secretly_recorded_mitch_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/why_i_secretly_recorded_mitch_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>390</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Vitter&#8217;s hypocritical, punitive, horrible new amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/david_vitters_hypocritical_punitive_horrible_new_amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/david_vitters_hypocritical_punitive_horrible_new_amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Stamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator's new measure denies food stamps for life to certain classes of ex-convicts (solicitation not included)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a sleepy moment on the Senate floor Wednesday, Senate Democrats accepted an amendment to the long-delayed farm bill that, if passed in its current form, would represent another step in turning previously incarcerated Americans into a permanent underclass. Certain classes of ex-convicts would be denied food stamp benefits <em>for life</em>, under the <a href="http://www.vitter.senate.gov/newsroom/press/vitter-passes-amendment-to-farm-bill-to-eliminate-food-stamps-for-murderers-sex-offenders">amendment offered by Sen. David Vitter</a> (cannily, the crime of soliciting prostitutes is exempted from this ban). While the amendment may sound like common sense, it’s actually a harshly punitive, counterproductive policy that will only increase crime and trap people in the criminal justice system.</p><p>The amendment was clearly created as a wedge issue, a perennial Republican effort to get Democratic senators to vote for something that can get used against them later in attack ads. Tom Coburn is a master of this; during the healthcare bill he offered an amendment banning sex offenders from receiving health insurance benefits for Viagra.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/david_vitters_hypocritical_punitive_horrible_new_amendment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/david_vitters_hypocritical_punitive_horrible_new_amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weak, incompetent Democrats blow another one</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/weak_incompetent_democrats_are_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/weak_incompetent_democrats_are_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats had every advantage on the immigration issue -- and still caved on their goals, preemptively]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend John Fugelsang <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnFugelsang/status/142340773935980545">likes to say</a> that the Democratic Party is like an S&amp;M submissive who forgot his safety word. After the lame performance of Democrats in the immigration reform markup, I would say Fugelsang is being generous. Republicans are incredibly skilled at holding no actual power but nonetheless making wildly effective threats. Democrats on the other hand display the unique and vexing ability to have every political advantage and <em>still</em> cave on their own goals, more often than not preemptively.</p><p>I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I would not be surprised if the modern Democratic Party’s strategy is secretly being bankrolled by Eli Lilly as a ploy to sell Prozac to liberals.</p><p>In the latest example of this disconcerting trend, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) proposed an amendment to the Senate immigration markup that would arguably harm American workers. In fact, it wasn’t just Democrats and labor unions that opposed this amendment; Republican Sen. Charles Grassley also opposed the amendment. But Democrats nonetheless backed the change in order to woo Hatch’s committee vote. Meanwhile, not only was Hatch’s committee vote not needed to approve the bill but Hatch has explicitly said he may still <em>not</em> vote for the legislation unless <em>other</em> changes are made. In other words, Hatch got to water down the legislation and Democrats got, er, well… nothing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/weak_incompetent_democrats_are_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/weak_incompetent_democrats_are_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How policy nihilists in the Senate doomed LGBT immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-sex couples lose in Senate immigration reform fight, as Democrats pander to cynical Lindsey Graham]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The immigration bill crafted by the Senate "Gang of Eight" passed the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday evening, with a 13-5 vote. Every senator involved in the markup session leading up to the vote was very proud of him- or herself for how great the markup session was going. Especially after the senators bravely shot down a proposal to recognize the marriages of LGBT immigrants.</p><p>It was a very self-congratulatory affair, as each senator congratulated every other senator for their great legislative skill, their deeply held principles and their impressive civility. The markup deliberations were "courageous," Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said, in reference to a bunch of people, mostly old dudes, carefully deciding exactly how awful they had to make an immigration bill before it could pass a Congress full of bigots, cynical fake-bigots and wingnuts. Even Ted Cruz was sort of civil as he hectored the committee for not passing his amendments, <a href="http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2013/05/cruzs-attempt-to-strip-citizenship-provision-from-immigration-reform-fails-in-a-big-way/?cmpid=hpfsln">most of which</a> were designed to ruin the bill. Everyone who opposes the bill, and those proposed amendments designed to sink it, had to say that they deeply <em>wanted</em> immigration reform to happen, it's just that they defined reform as "no citizenship plus a bigger fence." (Also everyone referred to the bill's authors as the "group of eight" and not a "gang.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a fight with Rick Santorum made an IRS commissioner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the little-told story of how Doug Shulman, who led the IRS when targeting occurred, unexpectedly got the job]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While President Obama fired IRS commissioner Steven Miller this week for failing to stop the enhanced scrutiny the IRS gave 501c4 applications with conservative missions, most of the activity happened under a man who was never supposed to get the job: Miller’s predecessor, Doug Shulman. Indeed, the little-known story of how Shulman was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007 stems from an unfortunate incident that derailed his party’s first choice for the spot.</p><p>One thing to keep in mind is that the president and his staff have literally thousands of posts to fill. A White House that doesn’t want to get bogged down will defer many of these lower-level appointments to politicians in his party who have some special interest or expertise in a position. The IRS commissioner is usually seen as a low-level position, since the commissioner merely enforces the law and has no ability to actually make law.</p><p>When it came time to replace the retiring IRS commissioner in 2007, Senator Charles Grassley, ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, offered up one of his senior staffers on the committee by the name of Dean Zerbe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Cabinet boycott reaffirms Senate is archaic embarrassment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/gop_boycott_of_epa_head_reaffirms_senate_is_archaic_embarrassment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/gop_boycott_of_epa_head_reaffirms_senate_is_archaic_embarrassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Vitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans try the "you did it first" defense after attempting to sabotage yet another Obama appointee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans on the Senate Environment and Public Works committee yesterday unexpectedly boycotted a vote to confirm Gina McCarthy, President Barack Obama's pick to head the Environmental Protection Agency, denying the committee a quorum and preventing McCarthy from moving to a full confirmation vote. The move, announced Thursday morning, was unexpected. It made <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=07E99867-8B2F-4593-8F7B-6206494E67B3">Democrats mad.</a> It shouldn't have been unexpected.</p><p>The issue is that Republicans won't sign on to McCarthy -- or any EPA administrator -- until she agrees to force the EPA to submit everything they do to a very "business-friendly" (time- and money-intensive) analysis. <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=07E99867-8B2F-4593-8F7B-6206494E67B3">Here's how Politico explains it:</a></p><blockquote><p>Republican leaders were unmoved, though, saying the Obama administration deserves blame for the impasse by refusing to fully answer questions that GOP nominees have posed about McCarthy and EPA. They include questions about the “underlying data used to justify EPA’s job-killing regulations,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said in a statement to POLITICO.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/gop_boycott_of_epa_head_reaffirms_senate_is_archaic_embarrassment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/gop_boycott_of_epa_head_reaffirms_senate_is_archaic_embarrassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren Q&amp;A: Students &#8220;deserve the same break that big banks get&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/elizabeth_warren_students_deserve_the_same_break_that_big_banks_get/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/elizabeth_warren_students_deserve_the_same_break_that_big_banks_get/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Loan Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator tells Salon about plan to lower student loan rates -- to match same rate banks pay to borrow from Fed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The U.S. government invests in big banks by giving them a great deal on their interest rates,” freshman Sen. Elizabeth Warren said in an interview with Salon on Wednesday afternoon (the transcript of which is below). “We should make at least the same investment in our students.”</p><p>Warren was discussing the first bill she has introduced in the Senate, a plan released on Wednesday to address the crisis of outstanding student debt – which <a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/studentloandebt/index.html">topped $1 trillion</a> this year, with over 37 million Americans owing thousands of dollars in higher education costs that could take decades to pay back.</p><p>Student debt is now the <a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/mediaadvisory/2013/Lee022813.pdf">second-highest form of debt</a> in America – behind only mortgage debt – with the number of borrowers and the average balance increasing 70 percent since 2004. <a href="http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2013/04/young-student-loan-borrowers-retreat-from-housing-and-auto-markets.html">Research</a> from the New York Federal Reserve Board indicates that this has begun to have an impact on the broader economy, with young people burdened by student debt more reluctant to take out auto or home loans. And without congressional action, this will get worse: on July 1, interest rates on federally subsidized Stafford student loans <a href="http://www.dailyillini.com/news/national/article_7976f446-a893-11e2-b669-0019bb30f31a.html">will double</a>, from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent. This will effectively raise costs for 8 million student borrowers by $1,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/elizabeth_warren_students_deserve_the_same_break_that_big_banks_get/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/elizabeth_warren_students_deserve_the_same_break_that_big_banks_get/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toomey: Background checks aren&#8217;t happening &#8220;any time soon&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/toomey_background_checks_arent_happening_any_time_soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/toomey_background_checks_arent_happening_any_time_soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“It’s a pretty heavy lift to get five senators to change their mind," Toomey said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Pat Toomey says that he doesn't think the Senate will take up his gun background checks measure any time in the near future. “It’s a pretty heavy lift to get five senators to change their mind on a big issue like this,” Toomey told a group of Digital First Media editors at <a href="http://mainlinemedianews.com/articles/2013/05/01/main_line_times/news/doc5180f9ddb3dee859736381.txt?viewmode=fullstory">the Times Herald</a>. “It’s not likely to happen any time soon. I hope people will reconsider over time.”</p><p>The measure, which Toomey, R-Penn., introduced with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., was five votes short of the 60 needed to break a Republican filibuster of the bill.</p><p>Though a few Democrats also voted against the bill, Toomey blamed the measure's failure on the politicization of the Republican Party. “In the end it didn’t pass because we’re so politicized," he said. "There were some on my side who did not want to be seen helping the president do something he wanted to get done, just because the president wanted to do it."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/toomey_background_checks_arent_happening_any_time_soon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/toomey_background_checks_arent_happening_any_time_soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What you need to know about Gabriel Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new GOP nominee in the race to replace John Kerry looks strong, but has plenty of problems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a secret cabal of scientists designed the perfect politician for today's GOP from the DNA up, it might look something like Gabriel Gomez, who won a GOP primary last night to face off against Democrat Ed Markey in a special election to fill the Massachusetts Senate seat vacated by Secretary of State John Kerry.</p><p>The bilingual first-generation former Navy SEAL is a Harvard Business School graduate with a successful business career, some moderate political stances, and a penchant for running marathons. He crossed the finish line at the Boston Marathon <a href="http://www.abc17news.com/news/elections/boston-bombings-overshadow-mass-senate-election/-/18518118/19949220/-/10x7dib/-/index.html">just a few minutes before</a> the bombs went off last month. While stationed in South America in the early 1990s he met his furutre-wife, who was working in the Peace Corps at a school for students with special needs. “<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/04/21/from-middle-class-beginnings-gomez-forged-unconventional-path/XQk3alB9AeKc7tg3yUB1SM/story.html">I’m exactly what the American dream is all about</a>,” Gomez said in an April GOP debate against two other Republican challengers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>